July 2020 - ALAC - lists.icann.org

News from Lacralo
by Sergio Salinas Porto Aug. 5, 2020

Aug. 5, 2020

Dear friends, I am sending this email to inform you that we have happily advanced in LACRALO in our internal laws, the New Rules of Procedure have been approved, this is another great step forward than taking the region. Now it remains to resolve the adaptability of our metric rules to the new laws already approved. I must congratulate here all those who got involved in the LACRALO Governance Working Group. as well as David Plumb who helped us to resolve the internal conflicts of LACRALO in a first stage (these are already part of the history) and in this new stage to be able to reach deep subregional agreements. Now is the time to delve further into the Working Group participation model, involving the community more strongly in ICANN policy issues from the perspective of LAC internet users. Today several groups are in action: Governance, Communication, IDN (who is the one that carries out the activities of Universal Acceptance), LACRALO WG Domains and their relationship with Users (who have taken up the issue of DNS Abuse). We hope shortly to have other working groups that can draw the attention of our colleagues in the region and put some ALSs (which have been dormant for a long time) into action! I send you happy for this news a big hug from Argentina! PS: Sorry for using the Google Translator translation *Sergio Salinas Porto**Presidente Internauta Argentina - LACRALO/ICANN <https://atlarge.icann.org/ralos/lacralo>**Asociación Argentina de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar/>/FeTIA <http://www.fetia.org.ar/>**FUILAC- Federación de Usuarios de Internet de LAC <https://fuilac.org>**facebook: salinasporto <http://www.facebook.com/salinasporto> **twitter: sergiosalinas <http://twitter.com/sergiosalinas>**Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819**"Ojalá podamos ser desobedientes, cada vez que recibimos órdenes que humillan nuestra * * conciencia o violan nuestro sentido común" Eduardo Galeano*

9 9

Fwd: Read the SubPro PDP Newsletter - July 2020 Edition
by Maureen Hilyard July 31, 2020

July 31, 2020

The latest edition is now available. New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP July 2020 Newsletter CURRENT STATUS The Working Group has finalized draft final recommendations <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> on most of the topics that will be included in the draft Final Report. In July, the Working Group focused on discussing and refining recommendations for several remaining topics: - 2 July <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…>: Review of feedback from Working Group members on the Work Track 5 Final Report <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> on the topic of geographic names at the top level. Discussion of Auctions/Private Resolution of Contention Sets <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> and Predictability Framework <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> . - 6 July <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…>: Review of feedback on revised sections <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> in “package” 6 (see the wiki <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> for additional information about the feedback received). - 9 July <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…>: Predictability Framework <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> . - 14 July <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…>: Auctions/Private Resolution of Contention Sets <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> . - 16 July <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…>: Auctions/Private Resolution of Contention Sets <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> . - 20 July <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…>: Auctions/Private Resolution of Contention Sets <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> . - 23 July <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…>: Auctions/Private Resolution of Contention Sets <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> and Predictability Framework <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> . - 27 July <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…>: Predictability Framework <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…>, Auctions/Private Resolution of Contention Sets <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…>, and Closed Generics <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> . - 30 July <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…>: Review of feedback on revised sections <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> in “package” 7 and final comments on revised sections <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> in “package” 6 (see the wiki <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> for additional information about the feedback received). Additional discussion on Auctions/Private Resolution of Contention Sets <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> . NEXT STEPS The Working Group will finalize draft final recommendations and open a public comment period on the draft Final Report. For the latest version of the Working Group’s work plan, please see the Working Group’s wiki <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…>. WHAT IS THIS ABOUT? In June 2014, the GNSO Council established a Discussion Group that was intended to evaluate the experiences of the 2012 round gTLD Program and to identify possible areas for future GNSO policy development. The Discussion Group’s deliverables <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> served as the basis for the GNSO Council request for a Preliminary Issue Report in June of 2015. Following the publication of the Final Issue Report <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…>, the GNSO Council adopted the charter <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> for the PDP Working Group, which began its work in February 2016. The Working Group initially concentrated on a set of overarching issues. It later conducted deliberations on additional topics in its charter using five separate Work Tracks: Work Track 1 - Overall Process/Support/Outreach, Work Track 2 - Legal/Regulatory, Work Track 3: String Contention/Objections & Disputes, Work Track 4: Internationalized Domain Names/Technical & Operations, Work Track 5: Geographic Names at the Top Level. WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT? The Discussion Group identified a number of subjects that may require further analysis and possible formulation of policy language. There are existing policy recommendations adopted by the GNSO Council and ICANN Board, which will remain in place unless the PDP WG determines that changes are needed. More Information - Workspace Wiki <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> - Charter <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> - Active Project Page <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> - GNSO Website <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> To join this effort, please email the GNSO Secretariat: gnso-secs(a)icann.org. All are welcome! Follow the GNSO on Twitter [image: Twitter] ‌ <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013q-nnMjFJRAFa6d-fX9N9A7NBPudka1I0wBjryCXTvxJ…> ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Unsubscribe maureen.hilyard(a)gmail.com <https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=un&m=00115LrDzKl3LoTB9FWCDiE2A%3D&…> Update Profile <https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=oo&m=00115LrDzKl3LoTB9FWCDiE2A%3D&…> | About our service provider <http://www.constantcontact.com/legal/service-provider?cc=about-service-prov…> Sent by emily.barabas(a)icann.org powered by [image: Trusted Email from Constant Contact - Try it FREE today.] <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=nge&rmc=VF19_3GE> Try email marketing for free today! <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=nge&rmc=VF19_3GE>

1 0

Fwd: call for volunteers: ccPDP4 on the (de)selection of IDN ccTLD strings
by Maureen Hilyard July 31, 2020

July 31, 2020

Hi everyone Please see the request below from the ccNSO. They are seeking volunteers from within At-Large to represent the ALAC on a working group to look at an alternative to the current IDN Fast Track Process. More information is provided below, but it would be helpful if you have some background in this regard or are prepared to do the required reading to get up to speed so that you are better able to participate effectively in this activity on behalf of the ALAC. If anyone is interested, please let me know before 28 July so that the ALAC can endorse and send the names of our representatives to the ccNSO before their closing date of 7 August. Regards Maureen ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Joke Braeken <joke.braeken(a)icann.org> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020, 12:33 am Subject: call for volunteers: ccPDP4 on the (de)selection of IDN ccTLD strings To: Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard(a)gmail.com> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org>, ccNSO Secretariat < ccnsosecretariat(a)icann.org> Dear Maureen, All, The ccNSO seeks volunteers for the Working Group which is tasked to develop policy recommendations for the (de)selection of IDN ccTLD strings, as part of the fourth ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP4). In time, the results of this ccPDP will replace the IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process, which currently guides the selection process of IDN ccTLD strings. This Working Group is open to participants from other ICANN stakeholder groups and the ccNSO welcomes ALAC representatives to join this important policy development effort. The call for volunteers will close Friday, 7 August 2020 (23:59 UTC), however participants can join after this date as well. The Group is expected to kick off its work at the start of September. Members, participants, and experts commit to participate actively and regularly in the work of the WG and are expected to have at least a basic understanding of the reference material (see attachment and included below). Those that apply also commit to the charter <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/138969190/Draft%20Charter%…> of the WG, including but not limited to the internal decision making and standards of behavior. Should there be interested parties that intend to join as a participants - once your respective SO/AC has completed its internal appoint procedure - please inform the ccNSO Secretariat (ccnsosecretariat(a)icann.org) about the names and email addresses, to add them to the mailing list. *Read more* - Detailed background information about ccPDP4 is included below. - Recently, the ccNSO Secretariat held a webinar to inform the community about the topics to be addressed and the working methods of the ccPDP4 WG. Consult the recording and slide deck here <https://community.icann.org/x/H4VIC>. - On 16 July, the ccNSO Secretariat shared a call for volunteers with the ccNSO membership and broader ccTLD community, targeted at ccTLD managers as potential members of the Working Group. Please find the call for volunteers here <https://ccnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-16jul20-en.htm>. You may find the information regarding who can join, the workload and working method and the background and reference materials useful. - In attachment you will be able to find information regarding the call for volunteers, that can be shared with your respective SO/AC. Kindly ensure to adjust the “how to apply” section. *About ccPDP4* In September 2013, the ccNSO submitted the IDN country code policy development process (ccPDP2) Board Report to the ICANN Board of Directors. The recommended policy ccPDP2 contains two parts: 1. High-level proposals for the criteria and requirements for the IDN ccTLD string selection and activities, roles, and responsibilities of the actors involved in the string selection and string evaluation processes and procedures. 2. Proposals to enable the inclusion of IDN ccTLDs in the ccNSO. By mutual understanding between the ccNSO and the ICANN Board, the Fast Track Process evolved, to test and gain more experience with the policy aspects pertaining to the introduction of IDN ccTLDs. The latest step in the evolution of the Fast Track Process was the introduction of the Risk Mitigation Panel and related process in case of confusing similarity of a requested IDNccTLD string in 2018. In March 2019 the ccNSO Council tasked a team (Preliminary Review Team or PRT) to review ccPDP2 in light of the impact of the following related processes on the recommended policies: - The evolved Fast Track Process, - The request of the ICANN Board of Directors with respect to IDN Variants and - Other relevant developments such as retirement of the (IDN) ccTLDs Based on its high-level analysis, the PRT identified various issues with the recommended policy for the selection of IDN ccTLD strings and advised Council to launch a ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP4) to address these issues, including the de-selection of IDN ccTLD strings. In January 2020, the ccNSO Council requested an Issue Report. In May 2020, after the Issue Report was submitted to Council, including the opinion of ICANN’s General Counsel, the ccNSO Council initiated the ccNSO Policy Development Process 4 to develop policy for the (de-)selection of IDN ccTLD strings. In addition, it was proposed to conduct ccPDP4 by way of a chartered working group, according to the proposed timeline. The Issue report will be published for comments shortly. The public comments, if any, will be used to inform the discussions of the WG. *Reference Materials & Links* - Issue report <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/132088151/Item%205%20a-%20…> - ccPDP4 section on ccNSO website: https://ccnso.icann.org/en/workinggroups/idn-cctld-strings.htm [ccnso.icann.org] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/ccnso.icann.org/en/workinggroups/idn-cct…> - ccPDP4 Workspace: https://community.icann.org/x/ZoBIC Thank you. Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ http://ccnso.icann.org

4 3

Re: [ALAC] ACTION/ALAC by Friday, 31 July 17 UTC: ALAC Statement on Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN âs Multistakeholder Model Next Steps
by Alan Greenberg July 31, 2020

July 31, 2020

The EPDP did use facilitators. They were David Plumb and Gina Bartlett from CBI. Alan At 2020-07-30 03:19 PM, Javier Rua wrote: >Thx Maureen. I know that thereâs good >experience in mediation. But I would go deeper: >What if at the start of a WG or WT we kind of >knew would be contentious ICANN professionally >kicked it off with a 1 or 2 day in person >stakeholders workshop, parsing out issues, >sides, sensitivities and looking for potential >solutions since day one? Lots of time and money and distress would be saved! > >Thx again Maureen & Marita earlier for these replies today! > >On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 2:52 PM Maureen Hilyard ><<mailto:maureen.hilyard@gmail.com>maureen.hilyard(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Hi Javier > >I dont think your idea is off-the-wall at all. >ICANN has already introduced a mediator to work >with conflict resolution in all sorts of >situations. And she is excellent to work with. > >I think that for something like the EPDP and MSM >which has got a multitude of high level decision >makers who believe that their views should take >priority over the views of other groups, then it >probably does need a different set of experts of >the ilk you have mentioned who are skilled at >facilitating discussions at this level. Nothing >wrong with adding that as a recommendation into the mix. > >M > > > >On Thu, 30 Jul 2020, 5:38 am Javier Rua, ><<mailto:javrua@gmail.com>javrua(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >Hello to all. IMHO, an aspect that seems absent >from this discussion is the possibility of >professional facilitation in thorny issues, to the extent compatible with MSM. > >This idea might go a bit against the grain in >terms of community self-governance which cannot >be underestimated, but there are profesional >entities out there that are experts in getting >diverse and even enemy groups to sit down and >negotiate (from peace / reconciliation >agreements among guerrillas and states, to more >run of the mill, less bellicose >disagreements). Iâve seen these entities in >action (I remember one called REOS Partners ><https://reospartners.com/>https://reospartners.com/) >and I believe these professional approaches >could help a contentious working group be more >purposeful, efficient and effective-Maybe pack >months of work into a few days. > >If this notion is seen completely out of the >ICANN MSM self-governance comfort zone, perhaps >one of these professional organizations could >help train ICANN community volunteer/leaders and >perhaps also ICANN staff, on these communication >and consensus building techniques. ICANN org >would get great âbang for the buckâ in >investments such as these, which would both >enhance participation and speed-up processes in WGs & PDPs. > >Javier RÃºa-Jovet > >+1-787-396-6511 >twitter: @javrua >skype: javier.rua1 ><https://www.linkedin.com/in/javrua>https://www.linkedin.com/in/javrua > > >>On Jul 30, 2020, at 11:04 AM, Evin Erdogdu >><<mailto:evin.erdogdu@icann.org>evin.erdogdu(a)icann.org> wrote: >> >>ï»¿ >> >>Dear ALAC Members, >> >> >>Please see the ALAC Statement on Enhancing the >>Effectiveness of ICANNâs Multistakeholder >>Model Next Steps and provide comments, if >>any, by this Friday, 31 July at 17:00 UTC: >> >> >><https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l8hAOyuL4XiTS-yzGbpgOk7pl4hSpH4yeMNxxiZ…>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l8hAOyuL4XiTS-yzGbpgOk7pl4hSpH4yeMNxxiZ… >> >> >>Thank you, >> >> >>Evin Ashley ErdoÄdu >> >>Policy Development Senior Coordinator >> >>Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >> >> >> >_______________________________________________ >ALAC mailing list >ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > >At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org >ALAC Working Wiki: >https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… >_______________________________________________ >By submitting your personal data, you consent to >the processing of your personal data for >purposes of subscribing to this mailing list >accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy >(https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the >website Terms of Service >(https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) You can >visit the Mailman link above to change your >membership status or configuration, including >unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or >disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

3 2

Re: [ALAC] ACTION/ALAC by Friday, 31 July 17 UTC: ALAC Statement on Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model – Next Steps
by Javier Rua July 30, 2020

July 30, 2020

Hello to all. IMHO, an aspect that seems absent from this discussion is the possibility of professional facilitation in thorny issues, to the extent compatible with MSM. This idea might go a bit against the grain in terms of community self-governance which cannot be underestimated, but there are profesional entities out there that are experts in getting diverse and even enemy groups to sit down and negotiate (from peace / reconciliation agreements among guerrillas and states, to more run of the mill, less bellicose disagreements). I’ve seen these entities in action (I remember one called REOS Partners https://reospartners.com/) and I believe these professional approaches could help a contentious working group be more purposeful, efficient and effective-Maybe pack months of work into a few days. If this notion is seen completely out of the ICANN MSM self-governance comfort zone, perhaps one of these professional organizations could help train ICANN community volunteer/leaders and perhaps also ICANN staff, on these communication and consensus building techniques. ICANN org would get great ‘bang for the buck’ in investments such as these, which would both enhance participation and speed-up processes in WGs & PDPs. Javier Rúa-Jovet +1-787-396-6511 twitter: @javrua skype: javier.rua1 https://www.linkedin.com/in/javrua > On Jul 30, 2020, at 11:04 AM, Evin Erdogdu <evin.erdogdu(a)icann.org> wrote: > > > Dear ALAC Members, > > > > Please see the ALAC Statement on Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model – Next Steps and provide comments, if any, by this Friday, 31 July at 17:00 UTC: > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l8hAOyuL4XiTS-yzGbpgOk7pl4hSpH4yeMNxxiZ… > > > > Thank you, > > > > Evin Ashley Erdoğdu > > Policy Development Senior Coordinator > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > > >

5 7

Re: [ALAC] EPDP Statements from others
by Alan Greenberg July 30, 2020

July 30, 2020

I didn't check the other groups but the ALAC was not correct. Hopefully next go around. Alan At 2020-07-30 06:53 AM, Justine Chew wrote: >I have just seen an updated Chairs Consensus Designation Table as at >30 July. Would that be an accurate summation, in your opinion? > >Thanks, >Justine >------ > > >On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 12:09, Alan Greenberg ><<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> wrote: >Of the 9 groups on the EPDP, 7 have now either issued statements or >given their level of consensus on the report. Not yet seen are the >NCSG or the ISPCP. But the initial consensus level issue by the >acting Chair who happens to be an NCSG member may indicate their >level of support. Note that the Chair's assessment came out BEFORE >any of the other groups spoke up - it was his best estimate. > >They make VERY interesting reading, and I strongly suggest that, at >least for current ALAC members, you read them all. > >I am still expecting a GAC and SSAC statement, but it make take a bit >of time. No idea whether NCSG or ISPCP will submit one. > >As expected, those with significant business interests (and paid >participation!) have made the strongest and most detailed statements. > >I note that the level of consensus on some recommendation will be >interesting. There are 7 groups on the EPDP and it looks like 4 or 5 >may not support certain recommendations. It is not clear how the >rating of the groups will impact consensus. My understanding is that >all groups should be given equal weight, so 4 or 5 out of 9 would be >DIVERGENCE (see the definitions of Consensus at the end of the >Chair's document). > >On the other hand, the NCSG has repeatedly argued that for the groups >within the GNSO, they must be weighted based on their votes in the >GNSO Council (not quite but basically NCSG = Ry = Rr = (IPC+BC+ISPC)) >and they have never said how the ACs would be factored into that. > >In the past, the GNSO Council has tended to approve recommendations >with Full Consensus or Consensus. I don't think they have accepted >recommendation with "Strong Support but Significant Opposition" and >certainly not "Divergence". Perhaps Cheryl can confirm. > >As other things come in, I will forward them. > >What we must decide is whether any of this makes us want to either >revise our statement or add an addendum. My initial inclination is to >go the addendum route. > >Alan_______________________________________________ >ALAC mailing list ><mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > >At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org >ALAC Working Wiki: ><https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL…>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… >_______________________________________________ >By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of >your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list >accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy >(<https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) >and the website Terms of Service >(<https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) >You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership >status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting >digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a >vacation), and so on.

1 0

Fwd: [ICANN Community Leaders] 30 July 2020
by Maureen Hilyard July 30, 2020

July 30, 2020

Thursday, 30 July 2020 ICANN Community Leadership Digest The ICANN org Policy Development Support function publishes this twice-weekly digest to help ICANN community leaders track requests and follow updates. Table of Contents Information Sharing - NEW: Country Code Top-Level Domain Participation in ICANN’s Domain Abuse Activity Reporting System - NEW: ALAC Capacity Building Webinar - ENDS TOMORROW: Universal Acceptance Steering Group FY21 Action Plan Available for Community Feedback - DEADLINE EXTENDED: Standing Panel for the ICANN Independent Review Process - Call for Expressions of Interest - REMINDER: Nomination Opens for Dr. Tarek Kamel Award for Capacity Building Public Comment - CLOSES TOMORROW: Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN's Multistakeholder Model - CLOSES SUNDAY: Third Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT3) Final Report - Label Generation Rules for the Root Zone Version 4 (RZ-LGR-4) Information Sharing NEW: Country Code Top-Level Domain Participation in ICANN’s Domain Abuse Activity Reporting System From: Dr. Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob, Lead Security, Stability, and Resiliency (SSR) Specialist, Office of the Chief Technology Officer (OCTO) Since late 2019, country code top-level domains (ccTLDs) have been able to voluntarily participate in the Domain Abuse Activity Reporting (DAAR) system designed by ICANN's Office of the Chief Technology Officer (OCTO). The DAAR system is used to study and report on domain name registration and security threat behavior across top-level domain (TLD) registries. Today, we are happy to announce the first eight ccTLDs who joined the project, .au, .ee, .ew, .nu, .se, .sv, .tw, .tz, are able to receive the DAAR data on a daily basis. Learn more <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001YriFqYIA7JgHzjFWHNyyaR8-4ftXIhwvkhU8C2zx-rzm…> . NEW: ALAC Capacity Building Webinar From: David Olive, Senior Vice President, Policy Development Support The At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) would like to invite you to join the fourth webinar of the At-Large Capacity Building Program for 2020 <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001YriFqYIA7JgHzjFWHNyyaR8-4ftXIhwvkhU8C2zx-rzm…> on the topic of New gTLD Rounds and Subsequent Procedures. The webinar will be held on Monday, 3 August at 13:00 UTC for 90 minutes. The draft agenda and call details can be found here <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001YriFqYIA7JgHzjFWHNyyaR8-4ftXIhwvkhU8C2zx-rzm…>. ENDS TOMORROW: Universal Acceptance Steering Group FY21 Action Plan Available for Community Feedback From: Sarmad Hussein, Internationalized Domain Names and Universal Acceptance Program Universal Acceptance (UA) is when all domain names and all email addresses work in all software applications. The Universal Acceptance Steering Group (UASG) was formed in 2015 to encourage the relevant stakeholders to make their applications UA ready. The UASG FY21 Action Plan <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001YriFqYIA7JgHzjFWHNyyaR8-4ftXIhwvkhU8C2zx-rzm…> is available for community feedback until Friday, 31 July 2020. DEADLINE EXTENDED: Standing Panel for the ICANN Independent Review Process - Call for Expressions of Interest Announcement <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001YriFqYIA7JgHzjFWHNyyaR8-4ftXIhwvkhU8C2zx-rzm…> On 31 March 2020 <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001YriFqYIA7JgHzjFWHNyyaR8-4ftXIhwvkhU8C2zx-rzm…>, ICANN opened a call for Expressions of Interest for panelists to serve on the omnibus Standing Panel for the ICANN Independent Review Process (IRP). Candidates for the IRP omnibus Standing Panel should review the Expressions of Interest document <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001YriFqYIA7JgHzjFWHNyyaR8-4ftXIhwvkhU8C2zx-rzm…>before submission. The document includes the following information: - Panel Position Description - Required or Highly Preferred Skills - Required or Highly Preferred Experience - Time Commitment - Compensation and Selection Expressions of Interest should be submitted to irp-standingpanel-eoi2020(a)icann.org <IRP-Standingpanel-EOI2020(a)icann.org> by 23:59 UTC on Friday, 31 August 2020. REMINDER: Nomination Opens for Dr. Tarek Kamel Award for Capacity Building Announcement <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001YriFqYIA7JgHzjFWHNyyaR8-4ftXIhwvkhU8C2zx-rzm…> ICANN recently opened a one-month nomination period for the Dr. Tarek Kamel Award for Capacity Building. ICANN first introduced <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001YriFqYIA7JgHzjFWHNyyaR8-4ftXIhwvkhU8C2zx-rzm…> the Dr. Tarek Kamel Award for Capacity Building in January to recognize ICANN community members for significant efforts in developing capacity in areas related to ICANN's Mission. The award was established in honor of the late Dr. Tarek Kamel, an Internet pioneer known for his contributions to global Internet governance. At the time of his passing, Kamel was ICANN's Senior Advisor to the President and Senior Vice President for Government and Intergovernmental Organization Engagement. Submit your nominations here <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001YriFqYIA7JgHzjFWHNyyaR8-4ftXIhwvkhU8C2zx-rzm…> by Friday, 21 August 2020. Public Comment CLOSES TOMORROW: Third Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT3) Final Report <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001YriFqYIA7JgHzjFWHNyyaR8-4ftXIhwvkhU8C2zx-rzm…> Close Date: Friday, 31 July 2020 CLOSES SUNDAY: Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN's Multistakeholder Model <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001YriFqYIA7JgHzjFWHNyyaR8-4ftXIhwvkhU8C2zx-rzm…> Close Date: Sunday, 2 August 2020 Label Generation Rules for the Root Zone Version 4 (RZ-LGR-4) <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001YriFqYIA7JgHzjFWHNyyaR8-4ftXIhwvkhU8C2zx-rzm…> Close Date: Tuesday, 11 August 2020 Volume 2, Issue 59 | Archive <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001YriFqYIA7JgHzjFWHNyyaR8-4ftXIhwvkhU8C2zx-rzm…> | Next Issue: Monday, 3 August 2020 ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Unsubscribe so-ac-sg-cleaders(a)icann.org <https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=un&m=00115LrDzKl3LoTB9FWCDiE2A%3D&…> Update Profile <https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=oo&m=00115LrDzKl3LoTB9FWCDiE2A%3D&…> | About our service provider <http://www.constantcontact.com/legal/service-provider?cc=about-service-prov…> Sent by david.olive(a)icann.org powered by [image: Trusted Email from Constant Contact - Try it FREE today.] <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=nge&rmc=VF19_3GE> Try email marketing for free today! <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=nge&rmc=VF19_3GE> _______________________________________________ SO-AC-SG-CLeaders mailing list SO-AC-SG-CLeaders(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

1 0

EPDP Statements from others
by Alan Greenberg July 30, 2020

July 30, 2020

Of the 9 groups on the EPDP, 7 have now either issued statements or given their level of consensus on the report. Not yet seen are the NCSG or the ISPCP. But the initial consensus level issue by the acting Chair who happens to be an NCSG member may indicate their level of support. Note that the Chair's assessment came out BEFORE any of the other groups spoke up - it was his best estimate. They make VERY interesting reading, and I strongly suggest that, at least for current ALAC members, you read them all. I am still expecting a GAC and SSAC statement, but it make take a bit of time. No idea whether NCSG or ISPCP will submit one. As expected, those with significant business interests (and paid participation!) have made the strongest and most detailed statements. I note that the level of consensus on some recommendation will be interesting. There are 7 groups on the EPDP and it looks like 4 or 5 may not support certain recommendations. It is not clear how the rating of the groups will impact consensus. My understanding is that all groups should be given equal weight, so 4 or 5 out of 9 would be DIVERGENCE (see the definitions of Consensus at the end of the Chair's document). On the other hand, the NCSG has repeatedly argued that for the groups within the GNSO, they must be weighted based on their votes in the GNSO Council (not quite but basically NCSG = Ry = Rr = (IPC+BC+ISPC)) and they have never said how the ACs would be factored into that. In the past, the GNSO Council has tended to approve recommendations with Full Consensus or Consensus. I don't think they have accepted recommendation with "Strong Support but Significant Opposition" and certainly not "Divergence". Perhaps Cheryl can confirm. As other things come in, I will forward them. What we must decide is whether any of this makes us want to either revise our statement or add an addendum. My initial inclination is to go the addendum route. Alan

2 1

Fwd: ccNSO Newsletter | July 2020
by Maureen Hilyard July 29, 2020

July 29, 2020

Find out the latest about the ccNSO. ccNSO Newsletter | July 2020 Apply now: speaking slots pre-ICANN69 Virtual ccTLD News Sessions We seek presenters! The ccNSO Meetings Programme Committee (MPC) will organise for the second time a set of Virtual ccTLD News Sessions. The MPC seeks presentation proposals from the ccTLD community, focusing preferably on one of the following 2 topics: 1. Policy updates by ccTLD registries during the COVID-19 pandemic 2. Legislative initiatives that impact ccTLD registries (e.g. the Digital Services Act package <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001JOiC74DEDM4mz947UVrAcQMSKGOQ4Ao1Qz4Byib4ZDDL…> by the European Commission, or other similar initiatives around the globe) Alternatively, the MPC might consider presentation proposals, covering for instance best practices, case studies, recent developments, ccTLD activities and ccTLD management related topics, both from an operational, marketing or legal point of view. There will be 2 options to participate, prior to ICANN69: - Virtual ccTLD News Session #1 | Tuesday, 29 September 2020 (11 UTC) - Virtual ccTLD News Session #2 | Thursday, 1 October 2020 (19 UTC) Find the instructions on how to apply here <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001JOiC74DEDM4mz947UVrAcQMSKGOQ4Ao1Qz4Byib4ZDDL…>. The deadline is Friday, 4 September 2020 (23:59 UTC) Help developing the ccNSO's IDN policy Apply now Interested in participating in this policy development process? Consult the instructions on how to apply and read background materials included here <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001JOiC74DEDM4mz947UVrAcQMSKGOQ4Ao1Qz4Byib4ZDDL…> . The call for volunteers will close Friday, 7 August 2020 (23:59 UTC). ccPDP4:(de)selection of IDN ccTLD strings The ccNSO seeks volunteers for the Working Group which is tasked to develop policy recommendations for the (de)selection of IDN ccTLD strings, as part of the fourth ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP4). In time, the results of this ccPDP will replace the IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process, which currently guides the selection process of IDN ccTLD strings. During its meeting on 21 May, the ccNSO Council adopted the Issue Report <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001JOiC74DEDM4mz947UVrAcQMSKGOQ4Ao1Qz4Byib4ZDDL…> on Internationalized Domain Name (IDN) country code top-level domain strings. With the adoption of this report, the fourth policy development process (ccPDP) for the ccNSO is initiated. Read more <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001JOiC74DEDM4mz947UVrAcQMSKGOQ4Ao1Qz4Byib4ZDDL…> or consult the recordings of a recent webinar here <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001JOiC74DEDM4mz947UVrAcQMSKGOQ4Ao1Qz4Byib4ZDDL…> . Candidates ICANN Board Seat 12 Nigel Roberts Katrina Sataki On Tuesday, 30 June 2020, 23.59 UTC, the recent call for nominations for the position of ICANN Board seat 12 was closed <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001JOiC74DEDM4mz947UVrAcQMSKGOQ4Ao1Qz4Byib4ZDDL…>. In accordance with the applicable rules, the following candidates – in alphabetical order – were nominated, seconded and have accepted their nomination: - Nigel Roberts <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001JOiC74DEDM4mz947UVrAcQMSKGOQ4Ao1Qz4Byib4ZDDL…> - Katrina Sataki <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001JOiC74DEDM4mz947UVrAcQMSKGOQ4Ao1Qz4Byib4ZDDL…> Both candidates accepted their nomination, and due diligence verifications will be starting shortly. An election will be held – starting in November 2020, after completion of the due diligence verifications – according to the timeline previously agreed upon by the ccNSO Council. The ccNSO Council and ccNSO members have agreed that the ccNSO members shall propose and elect candidates for the two ICANN Board seats allocated to the ccNSO, and that the winner of said election – i.e. the candidate that receives the majority of the votes cast – shall in turn be nominated to the ICANN Board seat by a majority vote of the ccNSO Council. A Q&A session will be held at the October 2020 Virtual ccNSO Members Meeting at ICANN69. This Q&A session will provide the ccNSO members and broader ccTLD community an opportunity to interact with the candidates. In preparation of this session, the candidates were invited to share their written candidate statements <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001JOiC74DEDM4mz947UVrAcQMSKGOQ4Ao1Qz4Byib4ZDDL…>. Read more <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001JOiC74DEDM4mz947UVrAcQMSKGOQ4Ao1Qz4Byib4ZDDL…> . ccNSO Council highlights The ccNSO Council conducted its monthly meeting on Wednesday, 24 June 2020. The agenda and relevant background material are available here <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001JOiC74DEDM4mz947UVrAcQMSKGOQ4Ao1Qz4Byib4ZDDL…>, and the resolutions approved by the ccNSO Council are available here <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001JOiC74DEDM4mz947UVrAcQMSKGOQ4Ao1Qz4Byib4ZDDL…>. Highlights of this ccNSO Council meeting include: - Adoption of the amended SOPC charter. The SOPC reviewed its charter and suggested some revisions, including changes to the membership rules. - Adoption of RWP-Proposed Assessment & Initial Implementation Plan for the ccNSO Review. The ccNSO Review Working Party (RWP) concluded its initial assessment of the recommendations made by the independent reviewer. - The ccNSO Council Nomination and Election Process for 2021. The ccNSO Council adopted a timeline and election process, including the appointment of an election process manager. Nominations will start in September 2020, followed by elections (if needed) in November 2020. - Adoption of the Final Report of the Cross-Community Working Group on New gTLD Auction Proceeds. The ccNSO Council is expected to adopt the Final Report of the CCWG-AP at its August 2020 meeting. - Review of the first ccNSO Council Virtual Workshop. The ccNSO Council looked back at the format of its first virtual workshop, review the results, and prepare next steps. The Council will not meet in July. The next ccNSO Council meeting is scheduled for Thursday, 20 August 2020 (12:00 UTC.) [image: Facebook] ‌ <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001JOiC74DEDM4mz947UVrAcQMSKGOQ4Ao1Qz4Byib4ZDDL…> [image: Twitter] ‌ <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001JOiC74DEDM4mz947UVrAcQMSKGOQ4Ao1Qz4Byib4ZDDL…> ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Unsubscribe maureen.hilyard(a)gmail.com <https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=un&m=00115LrDzKl3LoTB9FWCDiE2A%3D&…> Update Profile <https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=oo&m=00115LrDzKl3LoTB9FWCDiE2A%3D&…> | About our service provider <http://www.constantcontact.com/legal/service-provider?cc=about-service-prov…> Sent by ccnsosecretariat(a)icann.org powered by [image: Trusted Email from Constant Contact - Try it FREE today.] <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=nge&rmc=VF19_3GE> Try email marketing for free today! <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=nge&rmc=VF19_3GE>

1 0

Fwd: [ICANN Community Leaders] 27 July 2020
by Maureen Hilyard July 27, 2020

July 27, 2020

Monday, 27 July 2020 ICANN Community Leadership Digest The ICANN org Policy Development Support function publishes this twice-weekly digest to help ICANN community leaders track requests and follow updates. Table of Contents Information Sharing - REMINDER: Universal Acceptance Steering Group FY21 Action Plan Available for Community Feedback - DEADLINE EXTENDED: Standing Panel for the ICANN Independent Review Process - Call for Expressions of Interest - REMINDER: Nomination Opens for Dr. Tarek Kamel Award for Capacity Building Public Comment - CLOSES FRIDAY: Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN's Multistakeholder Model - Third Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT3) Final Report - Label Generation Rules for the Root Zone Version 4 (RZ-LGR-4) Information Sharing REMINDER: Universal Acceptance Steering Group FY21 Action Plan Available for Community Feedback From: Sarmad Hussein, Internationalized Domain Names and Universal Acceptance Program Universal Acceptance (UA) is when all domain names and all email addresses work in all software applications. The Universal Acceptance Steering Group (UASG) was formed in 2015 to encourage the relevant stakeholders to make their applications UA ready. The UASG FY21 Action Plan <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001llx4sHGU84deFY3kL4rCxpCAKRNpVrKlC25UGRqJfkRE…> is available for community feedback until Friday, 31 July 2020. DEADLINE EXTENDED: Standing Panel for the ICANN Independent Review Process - Call for Expressions of Interest Announcement <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001llx4sHGU84deFY3kL4rCxpCAKRNpVrKlC25UGRqJfkRE…> On 31 March 2020 <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001llx4sHGU84deFY3kL4rCxpCAKRNpVrKlC25UGRqJfkRE…>, ICANN opened a call for Expressions of Interest for panelists to serve on the omnibus Standing Panel for the ICANN Independent Review Process (IRP). Candidates for the IRP omnibus Standing Panel should review the Expressions of Interest document <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001llx4sHGU84deFY3kL4rCxpCAKRNpVrKlC25UGRqJfkRE…>before submission. The document includes the following information: - Panel Position Description - Required or Highly Preferred Skills - Required or Highly Preferred Experience - Time Commitment - Compensation and Selection Expressions of Interest should be submitted to irp-standingpanel-eoi2020(a)icann.org <IRP-Standingpanel-EOI2020(a)icann.org> by 23:59 UTC on Friday, 31 August 2020. REMINDER: Nomination Opens for Dr. Tarek Kamel Award for Capacity Building Announcement <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001llx4sHGU84deFY3kL4rCxpCAKRNpVrKlC25UGRqJfkRE…> ICANN recently opened a one-month nomination period for the Dr. Tarek Kamel Award for Capacity Building. ICANN first introduced <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001llx4sHGU84deFY3kL4rCxpCAKRNpVrKlC25UGRqJfkRE…> the Dr. Tarek Kamel Award for Capacity Building in January to recognize ICANN community members for significant efforts in developing capacity in areas related to ICANN's Mission. The award was established in honor of the late Dr. Tarek Kamel, an Internet pioneer known for his contributions to global Internet governance. At the time of his passing, Kamel was ICANN's Senior Advisor to the President and Senior Vice President for Government and Intergovernmental Organization Engagement. Submit your nominations here <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001llx4sHGU84deFY3kL4rCxpCAKRNpVrKlC25UGRqJfkRE…> by Friday, 21 August 2020. Public Comment CLOSES FRIDAY: Third Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT3) Final Report <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001llx4sHGU84deFY3kL4rCxpCAKRNpVrKlC25UGRqJfkRE…> Close Date: Friday, 31 July 2020 Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN's Multistakeholder Model <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001llx4sHGU84deFY3kL4rCxpCAKRNpVrKlC25UGRqJfkRE…> Close Date: Sunday, 2 August 2020 Label Generation Rules for the Root Zone Version 4 (RZ-LGR-4) <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001llx4sHGU84deFY3kL4rCxpCAKRNpVrKlC25UGRqJfkRE…> Close Date: Tuesday, 11 August 2020 Volume 2, Issue 58 | Archive <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001llx4sHGU84deFY3kL4rCxpCAKRNpVrKlC25UGRqJfkRE…> | Next Issue: Thursday, 30 July 2020 ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Unsubscribe so-ac-sg-cleaders(a)icann.org <https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=un&m=00115LrDzKl3LoTB9FWCDiE2A%3D&…> Update Profile <https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=oo&m=00115LrDzKl3LoTB9FWCDiE2A%3D&…> | About our service provider <http://www.constantcontact.com/legal/service-provider?cc=about-service-prov…> Sent by david.olive(a)icann.org powered by [image: Trusted Email from Constant Contact - Try it FREE today.] <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=nge&rmc=VF19_3GE> Try email marketing for free today! <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=nge&rmc=VF19_3GE> _______________________________________________ SO-AC-SG-CLeaders mailing list SO-AC-SG-CLeaders(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

1 0