December 2023 - ALAC - lists.icann.org

ccNSO updates
by Laura Margolis Dec. 28, 2023

Dec. 28, 2023

Dear All: The ccNSO meeting #201 was held on December 21st. at 21:00 UTC. You can find the AGENDA here <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ALAC+Liaison+to+the+ccNSO+Repor…>, but I would like to highlight some topics: *Update on ccPDP4-IDN* The fourth Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) Policy Development Process Working Group (ccPDP4-IDN) sought *community input* <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001hcExTmrHTB4PonYkxjo7sn9OmNxSscKeDNJsWqwhCr2…> on its initial policy proposals and is now analyzing the comments. The group hopes to complete its evaluation by January 2024. Once the ccNSO Council recommends adoption of the proposed policy, it will be put to a vote of the ccNSO membership. The fourth ccPDP defines the criteria, process, and procedures for the (de)selection of Internationalized Domain Name (IDN) ccTLDs associated with the country codes assigned to countries, territories, or other areas of geopolitical interest listed in the ISO 3166-1 standard. This ccPDP also responds to the ICANN Board's request to address issues related to variants of IDN ccTLD strings in coordination with the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) and the ICANN Board's question as to whether IDN tables should be reviewed upon submission. Once adopted by the ICANN Board and implemented by the ICANN organization, the proposed IDN ccTLD string selection policy will eventually replace the IDN ccTLD Fast Track process. *IGLC – Internet Governance Liason Committee* The IGLC prepared an FAQ <https://community.icann.org/display/ccnsowkspc/Repository> prior to ICANN78, in preparation for its session on WSIS+20. The WSIS+20 FAQ for ccTLDs is a comprehensive guide to understanding the significance of the 2025 review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS+20) for ccTLDs. During ICANN78, the IGLC held a working session where ccTLD community members and ICANN’s Government and Intergovernmental Organization Engagement (GE) team explored what the hot issues in Internet governance are on a regional basis. The IGLC compared the input with previous trends exercises. *WSIS+20: Frequently Asked Questions* Are you curious about the future of the internet and how it affects country code top-level domains? Look no further! Welcome to the WSIS+20 FAQ for ccTLDs, your comprehensive guide to understanding the significance of the 2025 review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS+20) for ccTLDs. In this FAQ developed by the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee, we delve into the key questions surrounding the evolving landscape of Internet Governance and the critical role that ccTLDs play in shaping the digital world, ensuring that you are well-equipped to participate in the global dialogue. - What is WSIS+20 and when will it take place? <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QXAkkp6xUZAtW1azElsbXpTlbvzWaw_2ro6Vkso…> - Why is WSIS+20 important to ccTLDs and what role do they play in the discussions? <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QXAkkp6xUZAtW1azElsbXpTlbvzWaw_2ro6Vkso…> - How can ccTLDs participate or engage in the WSIS+20 discussions, follow-up and implementation processes? <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QXAkkp6xUZAtW1azElsbXpTlbvzWaw_2ro6Vkso…> - Does WSIS+20 introduce any new opportunities or challenges for ccTLD managers? <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QXAkkp6xUZAtW1azElsbXpTlbvzWaw_2ro6Vkso…> - What is the Tunis Agenda for the Information Society? <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QXAkkp6xUZAtW1azElsbXpTlbvzWaw_2ro6Vkso…> - What is the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and will it affect the WSIS+20 consultations? <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QXAkkp6xUZAtW1azElsbXpTlbvzWaw_2ro6Vkso…> - How will WSIS+20 affect IGF? <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QXAkkp6xUZAtW1azElsbXpTlbvzWaw_2ro6Vkso…> - Will WSIS+20 affect the Multistakeholder Model of Internet Governance? <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QXAkkp6xUZAtW1azElsbXpTlbvzWaw_2ro6Vkso…> - Are there any resources or guidance available to ccTLDs to better understand WSIS+20 and its implications? <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QXAkkp6xUZAtW1azElsbXpTlbvzWaw_2ro6Vkso…> *Update on ccNSO working groups and committees* https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mGY0DAnqi2MXl7mJp4kGjVhZMdpsQmZtL2aGOfI… *December Newsletter* https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ALAC+Liaison+to+the+ccNSO+Repor… At the ccNSO Liason Wiki Space <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ALAC+Liaison+to+the+ccNSO+Repor…> you can find linked documents to the Agenda, Notes, Working Groups and last newsletters too. Please, let me know any questions or comments. Thank you and Happy Holidays to everyone. *Laura Margolis* ALAC Liason to ccNSO *Email:* margolisl(a)gmail.com *Office*: ++598 27066044 *Mobile / Whatsapp*: ++598 99690992 *skype:* lauri.margolis ccNSO Liason Workspace <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ALAC+Liaison+to+the+ccNSO+Repor…>

1 0

GNSO Council 21 Dec 2023 meeting agenda is out
by Justine Chew Dec. 26, 2023

Dec. 26, 2023

Dear all, Just a note to inform you that the agenda for the GNSO Council meeting of 21 Dec 2023 at 13:00 UTC is out as follows. For a curated version of the highlighted agenda item, please visit this link <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/GNSO+Liaison+Report%2C+post-Oct…> . *GNSO Council Meeting #12 of 2023 held on 21 Dec 2023 * *Full Agenda <https://community.icann.org/x/iIJME> | Documents <https://community.icann.org/x/g4JME> | Motions <https://community.icann.org/x/hYJME>* - *Item 1: Administrative Matters* - Item 2: Opening Remarks / Review of Projects List <https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/project> and Action Item List <https://community.icann.org/x/RgZlAg>. - Item 3: Consent Agenda - *Item 4: COUNCIL VOTE - EPDP on Internationalized Domain Names Phase 1 Final Report* - *Item 5: COUNCIL VOTE - GNSO Guidance Process (“GGP”) for Applicant Support Guidance Recommendation Final Report* - *Item 6: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - SubPro Small Team Update on Non-Adopted Recommendations * - *Item 7: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - EPDP on Temporary Specification Phase 1 Urgent Requests* - *Item 8: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Request for Reconsideration from Intellectual Property Constituency * - *Item 9: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Update on Key Outcomes and Action Items Coming out of GNSO Council Strategic Planning Session* - *Item 10: ANY OTHER BUSINESS* - 10.1 ccNSO & GAC Liaison updates - *10.2 Update on Diacritic Study Request* As usual, Council meetings are open to observers in listen-only mode. If you would like to observe the meeting, please check this link <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/GNSO+Liaison+Report%2C+post-Oct…> for details. Thanks for reading / considering. Justine Chew ALAC Liaison to the GNSO GNSO Liaison Report Workspace <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/GNSO+Liaison+Report%2C+post-Oct…> ------

1 2

The SSAC has published SAC123 and SAC122
by Matthias M. Hudobnik Dec. 21, 2023

Dec. 21, 2023

Hi colleagues, the SSAC has published SAC123 and SAC122. ### SSAC Report on the Evolution of Internet Name Resolution (SAC123): · Internet name resolution is evolving beyond just the global DNS to include alternative naming systems that are experimenting with different approaches for reasons like speed, privacy, censorship resistance, and governance. · Many alternative systems adopt DNS name syntax to leverage existing software. · Two concerning trends are increased ambiguity where the same name can resolve differently in different systems, and less visibility of names to end users even as names remain vital for security and trust. · Maintaining integrity and coordination in the shared domain namespace is important. · The report explores different perspectives on these trends from end users and developers. · It identifies proposals to facilitate namespace coordination and recommends ICANN continue tracking these issues and provide regular updates to the community. I highly recommend having a look at chapter: 7.1 End Users (some key aspects as follows): · Domain names used to play an important role for end users in discovering web resources, but search engines have now replaced them as the primary method of discovery. · End users today rarely directly interact with domain names due to the dominance of search engines and mobile devices. Features like browser "omnibars" also allow more free-form input. · Other identifiers like QR codes and social media handles now also compete for users' attention rather than domain names. · Domain names are becoming less visible in users' environments, yet they still provide an underlying ubiquitous resolution context relied upon by other technologies. · Surveys found search engines are by far the predominant method for accessing websites, with domain name usage declining. QR code usage is increasing but still limited except in Asia. · Decreased domain name visibility makes it easier for fraudsters to deceive users with lookalike names. Users are also generally unaware that some TLDs signal a different resolution context. In summary, domain names are no longer the primary method end users employ to find and access Internet resources, decreasing their visibility and understandability while introducing security issues. Link to the report: https://itp.cdn.icann.org/en/files/security-and-stability-advisory-committe… ### SSAC Report on Urgent Requests in gTLD Registration Data Policy (SAC122) · Focus is on handling of Urgent Requests in proposed gTLD registration data policy · Urgent Requests refer to imminent threats to life, injury, infrastructure or child exploitation · Proposed policy requires response to Urgent Requests in 24 hours generally · SSAC contends proposed policy for Urgent Requests is not fit for purpose · Definition and required response times are incompatible · Questions if need and rationale for separate Urgent Request process is fully justified · Existing ICANN policy and industry practices offer useful precedents · Proposed extensions allow responses up to 7 days, not reflecting urgency · Lack of concrete data on frequency and handling of such requests currently · Risks reputation of ICANN multistakeholder model effectiveness - Provides 3 recommendations § Add structure to ensure Urgent Requests handled expediently § Tighten response time requirements to be fit for purpose § Gather data on Urgent Requests for future policy making Link to the report: https://itp.cdn.icann.org/en/files/security-and-stability-advisory-committe… Have a nice evening! Best, M. ______________________________ Ing. Mag. Matthias M. Hudobnik FIP • CIPP/E • CIPT • DPO • CIS LA matthias(a)hudobnik.at http://www.hudobnik.at @mhudobnik

2 1