July 2016 - ALAC - lists.icann.org

Re: [ALAC] [ALAC-Announce] Fwd: Statement on changes to the Fellowship Program
by Alan Greenberg Aug. 1, 2016

Aug. 1, 2016

At 29/07/2016 06:36 AM, Seun Ojedeji wrote: >Hello Alan, > >Oh so a statement of support was also going to be helpful, was >thinking it was if we had concerns. Thanks for the draft and My +1 >to the statement at it currently stand, if its not too late, you may >consider a few minor comments below: > >1. Can "They play an impactful role in their respective countries >to...." be updated to "They play an impactful role in their >respective countries and within ICANN to...." I think emphasizing >the impact of atlarge within ICANN is quite important. I have always >been of the opinion that atlarge defending the interest of end-users >within ICANN is of more importance than what they do outside of it. >Ofcourse not that, that is also not important. In my mind, what we do inside of ICANN is why we are here! The rest should be a facilitater to make the internal effrots more effective and better reflect what users need. >2. I suggest re-wording of the third paragraph to the following: >"The ALAC recognizes that these changes may make the process of >selecting candidates more difficult, but believes ICANN is making a >wise choice in doing this and would ensure to maintain fairness and >balance in the selection process, especially towards improving >representation of under-served/under developed countries/territories >within ICANN processes " I will make a change to this effect. >Regards > > >On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Alan Greenberg ><<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> wrote: > >To: ALAC <<mailto:alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org>alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >From: Alan Greenberg ><<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> >Subject: Statement on changes to the Fellowship Program > >As discussed during the ALAC call earlier this week, there is a >Public Comment just about to close on changes to the ICANN Fellowship Program. > >Some people in At-Large have been (rightfully) VERY vocal about >perceived problems in the Fellowship program, specifically: > >- people from some countries (such as Argentina) have recently >become ineligible to participate in the Fellowship Program because >the country has had its status upgraded in the World Bank list of >development status (based on income); >- some people, particularly from some island territories were not eligible. > >In both cases, the status of the overall economy might not have met >the criteria, but that did not alter the perception that the people >were not well represented in ICANN. > >The proposed changes to the Fellowship Program address these >problems and more. > >Unfortunately, no one chose to volunteer to draft a brief statement >of support for the changes. > >At the ALAC Leadership Team meeting yesterday, it was decided that >the Fellowship Program is sufficiently important to At-Large, the >people we represent, and to ICANN in general that we MUST submit >something. Accordingly, I drafted a set of notes which Ariel Liang >ably transformed into a statement to be submitted. > >The statement can be found at ><https://community.icann.org/x/LiOOAw>https://community.icann.org/x/LiOOAw. > >The deadline for submission is tomorrow, Friday, 29 July at 23:59 >UTC. I will conduct a Consensus Call for formally ratify the >statement next week, but if anyone has any concern with the >statement, please bring that concern to my attention immediately. > >Alan > > >_______________________________________________ >ALAC-Announce mailing list ><mailto:ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce > >At-Large Official Site: ><http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org > > > > >-- >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Seun Ojedeji, >Federal University Oye-Ekiti >web: <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng>http://www.fuoye.edu.ng >Mobile: +2348035233535 >alt email:<http://goog_1872880453> ><mailto:seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng>seun.ojedeji(a)fuoye.edu.ng > >Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action! >

4 4

Statement on changes to the Fellowship Program
by Alan Greenberg July 29, 2016

July 29, 2016

As discussed during the ALAC call earlier this week, there is a Public Comment just about to close on changes to the ICANN Fellowship Program. Some people in At-Large have been (rightfully) VERY vocal about perceived problems in the Fellowship program, specifically: - people from some countries (such as Argentina) have recently become ineligible to participate in the Fellowship Program because the country has had its status upgraded in the World Bank list of development status (based on income); - some people, particularly from some island territories were not eligible. In both cases, the status of the overall economy might not have met the criteria, but that did not alter the perception that the people were not well represented in ICANN. The proposed changes to the Fellowship Program address these problems and more. Unfortunately, no one chose to volunteer to draft a brief statement of support for the changes. At the ALAC Leadership Team meeting yesterday, it was decided that the Fellowship Program is sufficiently important to At-Large, the people we represent, and to ICANN in general that we MUST submit something. Accordingly, I drafted a set of notes which Ariel Liang ably transformed into a statement to be submitted. The statement can be found at https://community.icann.org/x/LiOOAw. The deadline for submission is tomorrow, Friday, 29 July at 23:59 UTC. I will conduct a Consensus Call for formally ratify the statement next week, but if anyone has any concern with the statement, please bring that concern to my attention immediately. Alan

2 1

Re: [ALAC] [ALAC-Announce] Fwd: Statement on changes to the Fellowship Program
by Seun Ojedeji July 29, 2016

July 29, 2016

Hello Alan, Oh so a statement of support was also going to be helpful, was thinking it was if we had concerns. Thanks for the draft and My +1 to the statement at it currently stand, if its not too late, you may consider a few minor comments below: 1. Can "They play an impactful role in their respective countries to...." be updated to "They play an impactful role in their respective countries and within ICANN to...." I think emphasizing the impact of atlarge within ICANN is quite important. I have always been of the opinion that atlarge defending the interest of end-users within ICANN is of more importance than what they do outside of it. Ofcourse not that, that is also not important. 2. I suggest re-wording of the third paragraph to the following: "The ALAC recognizes that these changes may make the process of selecting candidates more difficult, but believes ICANN is making a wise choice in doing this and would ensure to maintain fairness and balance in the selection process, especially towards improving representation of under-served/under developed countries/territories within ICANN processes " Regards On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> wrote: > > To: ALAC <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >> From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> >> Subject: Statement on changes to the Fellowship Program >> >> As discussed during the ALAC call earlier this week, there is a Public >> Comment just about to close on changes to the ICANN Fellowship Program. >> >> Some people in At-Large have been (rightfully) VERY vocal about perceived >> problems in the Fellowship program, specifically: >> >> - people from some countries (such as Argentina) have recently become >> ineligible to participate in the Fellowship Program because the country has >> had its status upgraded in the World Bank list of development status (based >> on income); >> - some people, particularly from some island territories were not >> eligible. >> >> In both cases, the status of the overall economy might not have met the >> criteria, but that did not alter the perception that the people were not >> well represented in ICANN. >> >> The proposed changes to the Fellowship Program address these problems and >> more. >> >> Unfortunately, no one chose to volunteer to draft a brief statement of >> support for the changes. >> >> At the ALAC Leadership Team meeting yesterday, it was decided that the >> Fellowship Program is sufficiently important to At-Large, the people we >> represent, and to ICANN in general that we MUST submit something. >> Accordingly, I drafted a set of notes which Ariel Liang ably transformed >> into a statement to be submitted. >> >> The statement can be found at https://community.icann.org/x/LiOOAw. >> >> The deadline for submission is tomorrow, Friday, 29 July at 23:59 UTC. I >> will conduct a Consensus Call for formally ratify the statement next week, >> but if anyone has any concern with the statement, please bring that concern >> to my attention immediately. >> >> Alan >> > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC-Announce mailing list > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce > > At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji(a)fuoye.edu.ng <seun.ojedeji(a)fuoye.edu.ng>* Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!

1 0

Re: [ALAC] [ALAC-Announce] Fwd: Statement on changes to the Fellowship Program
by Judith Hellerstein July 28, 2016

July 28, 2016

HI Alan, I am glad to see that ALAC will have an official comment on the Fellowship Program. In NARALO we have been very vocal on this and four of our ALSes plus one potential ALS have posted comments. This include, myself, Glenn, Eve Edelson (ISOC SF Bay) and Loris Taylor (NPM). Although I am not an ALAC member I support your statement Best, Judith _________________________________________________________________________ Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO Hellerstein & Associates 3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008 Phone: (202) 362-5139 Skype ID: judithhellerstein E-mail: Judith(a)jhellerstein.com Website: www.jhellerstein.com Linked In: www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/ Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide On 7/28/2016 6:06 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote: > >> To: ALAC <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >> From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> >> Subject: Statement on changes to the Fellowship Program >> >> As discussed during the ALAC call earlier this week, there is a Public >> Comment just about to close on changes to the ICANN Fellowship Program. >> >> Some people in At-Large have been (rightfully) VERY vocal about perceived >> problems in the Fellowship program, specifically: >> >> - people from some countries (such as Argentina) have recently become >> ineligible to participate in the Fellowship Program because the country has >> had its status upgraded in the World Bank list of development status (based >> on income); >> - some people, particularly from some island territories were not eligible. >> >> In both cases, the status of the overall economy might not have met the >> criteria, but that did not alter the perception that the people were not well >> represented in ICANN. >> >> The proposed changes to the Fellowship Program address these problems and more. >> >> Unfortunately, no one chose to volunteer to draft a brief statement of >> support for the changes. >> >> At the ALAC Leadership Team meeting yesterday, it was decided that the >> Fellowship Program is sufficiently important to At-Large, the people we >> represent, and to ICANN in general that we MUST submit something. >> Accordingly, I drafted a set of notes which Ariel Liang ably transformed into >> a statement to be submitted. >> >> The statement can be found at https://community.icann.org/x/LiOOAw. >> >> The deadline for submission is tomorrow, Friday, 29 July at 23:59 UTC. I will >> conduct a Consensus Call for formally ratify the statement next week, but if >> anyone has any concern with the statement, please bring that concern to my >> attention immediately. >> >> Alan > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC-Announce mailing list > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce > > At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org >

1 0

FYI - New Public Comment: gTLD Marketplace Health Index (Beta)
by Ariel Liang July 26, 2016

July 26, 2016

Dear All, As per today’s ALAC Teleconference, the ALAC would like to seek your input on the Public Comment on the gTLD Marketplace Health Index (Beta): Call for Comments. It would be great if someone from the At-Large New gTLDs Working Group and/or Registration Issues Working Group to volunteer to review this public comment and draft a Statement on behalf of the ALAC, if it is needed. I would also like to draw your attention to the ALAC Statement on a related public comment last year (gTLD Marketplace Health Index Proposal). If you’d like to volunteer, please be so kind to let me know. Thank you for your time! Best regards, Ariel Ariel Xinyue Liang Policy Analyst | Washington, DC Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype: ariel.liang.icann Mobile: +1 (310) 804-2761 Email: ariel.liang(a)icann.org Website: atlarge.icann.org Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org> on behalf of ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Date: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 at 7:52 PM To: "alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>, "at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: New Public Comment: gTLD Marketplace Health Index (Beta) Dear All, This is to let you know that the Public Comment on the ‘gTLD Marketplace Health Index (Beta)' has now gone live: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gtld-marketplace-health-beta-2016-07-…. Public comment will end on 06 September 2016 23:59 UTC. During this period, anyone can submit comment via comments-gtld-marketplace-health-beta-19jul16(a)icann.org. As an advisory committee of ICANN, the ALAC submits Statements on Public Comment and advises on policy matters related to the interest of Internet users worldwide. Not just limited to the 15 ALAC members, members from the wider At-Large community are welcome to draft a Statement on behalf of the ALAC. If you are interested in drafting an ALAC Statement on this Public Comment, kindly contact staff(a)atlarge.icann.org. At-Large Staff will follow up and help you understand the procedure. Additionally, the wiki workspace for developing a potential ALAC Statement is here: https://community.icann.org/x/cAubAw. All pertinent resources for this public comment can also be found there. Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine, Terri Agnew and Yeşim Nazlar ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Website: atlarge.icann.org Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge

1 0

Proposed Amendments to Base New gTLD Registry Agreement Workspace
by Alan Greenberg July 13, 2016

July 13, 2016

For those of you who do not "follow" all of our Wiki pages, please note the comment I made today on the Proposed Amendments to Base New gTLD Registry Agreement. When I and others first reviewed the amendments, we did not find much to comment on. In conversations during and after Helsinki (with both At-Large people and those from other parts of ICANN), it became more obvious (to me) that there are several issues that need to be raised - forcefully. The comment period officially ends this coming Wednesday, but I have asked for a week's extension. We should hear tomorrow whether this is granted. The registry agreement governs the core of one of ICANN's main areas of responsibility. Please look at the comments at https://community.icann.org/x/uBiOAw and circulate as appropriate. If there is no extension granted, we will have to act very quickly, so please let us know if you, in general or in detail, support the ALAC making such a comment. Alan (taking time out from a great and peaceful vacation in Finland, so you have some idea of the importance I put on this)

6 6

ALS Criteria and Expectations
by Alan Greenberg July 8, 2016

July 8, 2016

Please find attached, the document for discussion at the ALS Criteria and Expectations session at 10:45 on Monday. If you will be attending the Outreach & Engagement session, please ensure that someone from your region will be at the ALS meeting to present your views. Alan

6 6

FYI - REVISED Call for Candidates: RALO Representatives in the ALAC Appointee Selection Committee
by ICANN At-Large Staff July 6, 2016

July 6, 2016

Dear All, On behalf of Alan Greenberg, Chair of the ALAC, the call for candidates for the RALO representatives in the ALAC Appointee Selection Committee is now open. Each RALO must select one (1) representative to the ALAC Appointee Selection Committee. The RALO representatives must not be the ALAC Leadership Team members (Alan Greenberg, Tijani Ben Jemaa, Leon Sanchez, Holly Raiche, and Sandra hoferichter). The names of the representatives must be sent to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> no later than 23:59 UTC on 14 July 2016. Those appointed to the Selection Committee must be prepared to review the Expression of Interest for the ALAC Liaison to the Customer Standing Committee (CSC) position between 15 July and 18 July and attend a 2-hour teleconference on 18 July to discuss the ALAC Liaison candidates. “For background, this Selection committee, composed of the ALAC Leadership Team (ALT) and five ALAC members and Chaired by Alan will receive and review Expressions of Interest for various ALAC appointments until the ends of the Hyderabad meeting. In addition to the immediate selection of CSC candidates, it is expected that during this time, we will have one or more A0C-type Review Committees and ALAC Liaison(s) which will require candidate searches." Thank you. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine, Terri Agnew and Yeşim Nazlar ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

1 0

Re: [ALAC] ALS Criteria and Expectations
by Maureen Hilyard July 6, 2016

July 6, 2016

Thanks Evan..OK I get you. PICISOC has so many different interest groups.. but the ALS itself is grounded in At-Large. And yes, the expectation for reporting is from the organisation, not from ICANN. Hope the new job is going well. Great to see that we are still of interest to you :) Maureen On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Evan Leibovitch <evanleibovitch(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Maureen, > > Thanks for the reply. > > I don't see anything that you said that runs counter to anything I said. > > Of course it's possible for any individual to be participant in any number > of different groups, each of which may be involved in a different ICANN > Constituency. What I disagree with is the organisations themselves being > part of multiple entry points. If an ISOC chapter (for instance) is an ALS > it should not be part of any other Constituency... THAT is "double > dipping". > > And regarding: > > "Also, because we want our members to value ICANN activities, reporting > back to members is an expectation we make of our leaders" > > That's perfectly legitimate. But it refers to the obligation of an ALS's > leaders to its membership; they have NO obligation of similar > accountability to ICANN. > > Cheers, > > - Evan (via mobile) > On 6 Jul 2016, at 08:39, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard(a)gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi Evan >> >> I can appreciate what you are saying and agree with most of it, however, >> I think that you are looking at a one-size-fits-all model of an ALS. >> >> Take my small NGO in the (14,000 population) Cook Islands. I have to >> admit to two active participants in ICANN activities - me on the ALAC and >> Pua Hunter who represents the Cook Islands in the GAC. Local CIIAG members >> are also members of the regional ALS - PICISOC - and they participate at a >> local/ regional level. Some PICISOC members may never actually interact >> with At-Large because there are various levels of interest within this >> large organisation. >> >> But PICISOC does have other active members in At-Large, the ccNSO and >> NCUC, just to name some of the sections, and many PICISOC members may also >> belong to other ALSes within Oceania. We share our expertise :) >> >> Is that double dipping when our small communities in the Pacific have >> multiple memberships of ALSes which may not focus on a single sector of >> ICANN? What we are trying to do is to give Pacific end-users the widest >> possible reach for opportunities to have a voice across ICANN >> constituencies - not restricting them to At-Large. >> >> Also, because we want our members to value ICANN activities, reporting >> back to members is an expectation we make of our leaders. It depends on >> each ALS as to how they do this but sometimes, the use of relevant ICANN >> reports and newsletters can be very helpful. >> >> Maureen >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Evan Leibovitch <evan(a)telly.org> >> wrote: >> >>> I have always, and still do, object vigorously to most of what is listed >>> under "ALS objectives". I think they (most notably the obligation to >>> feature ICANN on ALS websites and to report on their activities to ICANN) >>> are uncalled-for demands of the time of volunteers already stretched. >>> >>> Let us remind ourselves ALWAYS that purpose of the ALS is to help and >>> give input to ICANN on policy (through RALOs and then ALAC). It is NOT the >>> job of ICANN to be aware of what the ALS is doing in any area that does not >>> directly affect ICANN (unless ICANN is interested in offering resources for >>> such activity). >>> >>> At-Large is also not a pyramid scheme. Having ALSs spread the word to >>> other like-minded organizations is a nice-to-have but should never be >>> mandatory. If there is a desire for ALSs to recruit others, great.... >>> engage and excite them enough that they would spread the word on their own. >>> Mandating this through rules simply demonstrates failure to sufficiently >>> energize existing ALSs. >>> >>> And there must ALWAYS be provision for the scenario that an ALS could be >>> dormant -- for months, maybe years -- until an issue of importance to them >>> is raised. Remember that At-Large is intended to represent the views and >>> interests of those in the community who may generally not interested in >>> general ICANN governance, but have an interest in its policy outputs. Much >>> as it likes to think otherwise, ICANN is involved with only a tiny corner >>> of the Internet governance world(*), so its activity will not be of primary >>> interest to many. It is reasonable that such limited-interest ALSs not be >>> resourced to travel to events unless their issues are being addressed. >>> However there is NO VALID REASON EVER for ALAC to bother or harass -- let >>> alone disenfranchise -- an ALS for not caring about ICANN issues that are >>> irrelevant to them. >>> >>> That someone would even ask the question "is being a Watcher sufficient" >>> indicates a grotesque misunderstanding of why At-Large exists! >>> >>> Frankly, most of this whole exercise is utter BS. The only issue of >>> value in the document Alan passed (besides housekeeping) was "double >>> dipping" -- that is, when an organization already in another constituency >>> wants to be in At-Large. Personally, I would disallow this, because >>> At-Large is designed to give a voice to those who otherwise would not have >>> a place to be heard in ICANN. If they already have that other place, the >>> At-Large ought not to be exploited as a channel of second resort or >>> redundant point of entry. >>> >>> Other than that, the creation and consideration of this document is the >>> kind of abuse of volunteer time and resources that leads to the very >>> non-participation it seeks to address. How about understanding the causes >>> of non-participation rather than fixing perceived symptoms by regulation? >>> Many it is just a reality that many ALSs will only wake up when something >>> that interests them comes up. *There is nothing wrong with that*. >>> >>> Those are my comments. I will not be in Helsinki, and because of other >>> engagements I will not be able to participate remotely in the 10:45 >>> meeting. >>> >>> - Evan >>> >>> (*) - Internet names and numbers are indeed only a tiny part of Internet >>> governance, but it's the only one that whose decisions can single-handedly >>> enrich an entire industry. It's where the money hangs out. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ALAC mailing list >>> ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac >>> >>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org >>> ALAC Working Wiki: >>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… >>> >> >>

1 0

FYI - Call for Candidates: RALO Representatives in the ALAC Appointee Selection Committee
by ICANN At-Large Staff July 6, 2016

July 6, 2016

FYI From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org> on behalf of Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org> Date: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 9:04 AM To: "secretariat(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <secretariat(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Call for Candidates: RALO Representatives in the ALAC Appointee Selection Committee Dear All, On behalf of Alan Greenberg, Chair of the ALAC, the call for candidates for the RALO representatives in the ALAC Appointee Selection Committee is now open. Each RALO must select one (1) representative to the ALAC Appointee Selection Committee. The RALO representatives must not be the ALAC Leadership Team members (Alan Greenberg, Tijani Ben Jemaa, Leon Sanchez, Holly Raiche, and Sandra Hoferichter). The names of the representatives must be sent to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org no later than 23:59 UTC on 14 July 2016. Those appointed to the Selection Committee must be prepared to review the Expression of Interest for the ALAC Liaison to the Customer Standing Committee (CSC) position between 15 July and 18 July and attend a 2-hour teleconference on 18 July to discuss the ALAC Liaison candidates. For background information of the ALAC Appointee Selection Committee, please refer to the powerpoint slides attached and the ALAC Actions in ICANN56 page: https://community.icann.org/x/pi_AAw. Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine, Terri Agnew and Yeşim Nazlar ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

1 0