September 2018 - ALAC - lists.icann.org

Re: [ALAC] [At-Large] [Alac-sc-outreach] v7.5 of the ICANN Stakeholder Analysis Tool - new redesigned Regional Dashboard
by Satish Babu Sept. 26, 2018

Sept. 26, 2018

Thanks for the update, Dev! I was initially getting a warning about fonts, but now everything appears to be working fine. satish On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:17 PM, Remmy Nweke <remmyn(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for this great work Dev. > > Please I will like to find out why NCUC was part of the consideration > instead of Non Commercial Stakeholders Group. > > Or better what formed the choice of supporting organisations used. > Regards > > Weldone > Remmy Nweke > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, 4:02 a.m. Dev Anand Teelucksingh, <devtee(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Did an update to the ICANN Stakeholder Analysis Tool which allows for >> the ability to search by country: >> - At-Large Representation >> - ccNSO membership >> - GAC Membership >> - NCUC membership (persons and organisations) >> - Fellowships >> - Nextgen >> - Accredited Registrars >> >> and also do a regional or worldwide analysis on At-Large, ccNSO, GAC, NCUC >> and accredited registrars. >> >> The key change was a new look layout of the regional dashboard based >> on a suggestion from >> Olivier Crépin-Leblond (see attached screenshot) >> >> The Stakeholder Tool can be accessed at >> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ICANN+ >> Stakeholder+Analysis+Tool >> >> Regards >> >> Dev Anand Teelucksingh, >> At-Large member, Trinidad and Tobago Computer Society (http://ttcs.tt/) >> _______________________________________________ >> Alac-sc-outreach mailing list >> Alac-sc-outreach(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-sc-outreach >> > > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org >

1 0

Re: [ALAC] [Alac-sc-outreach] v7.5 of the ICANN Stakeholder Analysis Tool - new redesigned Regional Dashboard
by Dev Anand Teelucksingh Sept. 26, 2018

Sept. 26, 2018

Hi, Remmy, thanks for the question. The reason why NPOC hasn't been included in the tool is because based the list of NPOC members at https://www.npoc.org/about/members/ doesn't list any country/territory information. If NPOC does update this table to include another column for the county/territory where the organisation is from, then it would be straightforward to bring the NPOC information to the tool. Regards, Dev Anand On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:47 AM Remmy Nweke <remmyn(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for this great work Dev. > > Please I will like to find out why NCUC was part of the consideration instead of Non Commercial Stakeholders Group. > > Or better what formed the choice of supporting organisations used. > Regards > > Weldone > Remmy Nweke > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, 4:02 a.m. Dev Anand Teelucksingh, <devtee(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Did an update to the ICANN Stakeholder Analysis Tool which allows for >> the ability to search by country: >> - At-Large Representation >> - ccNSO membership >> - GAC Membership >> - NCUC membership (persons and organisations) >> - Fellowships >> - Nextgen >> - Accredited Registrars >> >> and also do a regional or worldwide analysis on At-Large, ccNSO, GAC, NCUC >> and accredited registrars. >> >> The key change was a new look layout of the regional dashboard based >> on a suggestion from >> Olivier Crépin-Leblond (see attached screenshot) >> >> The Stakeholder Tool can be accessed at >> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ICANN+Stakeholder+Analysis+Tool >> >> Regards >> >> Dev Anand Teelucksingh, >> At-Large member, Trinidad and Tobago Computer Society (http://ttcs.tt/) >> _______________________________________________ >> Alac-sc-outreach mailing list >> Alac-sc-outreach(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-sc-outreach

1 0

v7.5 of the ICANN Stakeholder Analysis Tool - new redesigned Regional Dashboard
by Dev Anand Teelucksingh Sept. 26, 2018

Sept. 26, 2018

Did an update to the ICANN Stakeholder Analysis Tool which allows for the ability to search by country: - At-Large Representation - ccNSO membership - GAC Membership - NCUC membership (persons and organisations) - Fellowships - Nextgen - Accredited Registrars and also do a regional or worldwide analysis on At-Large, ccNSO, GAC, NCUC and accredited registrars. The key change was a new look layout of the regional dashboard based on a suggestion from Olivier Crépin-Leblond (see attached screenshot) The Stakeholder Tool can be accessed at https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ICANN+Stakeholder+Analysis+Tool Regards Dev Anand Teelucksingh, At-Large member, Trinidad and Tobago Computer Society (http://ttcs.tt/)

4 3

Fwd: APTLD Statement on Country and Territory Designations as Top-Level Domains
by Andrei Kolesnikov Sept. 26, 2018

Sept. 26, 2018

FYI APTLD statement about 2 letter code for gTLD --andrei ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Leonid Todorov <l.todorov(a)aptld.org> Date: вт, 25 сент. 2018 г. в 9:36 Subject: APTLD Statement on Country and Territory Designations as Top-Level Domains To: <comments-gtld-subsequent-procedures-initial-03jul18(a)icann.org> Dear Sirs- please find herewith APTLD's comment on the matter. Thank you, Leonid Leonid Todorov GM l.todorov(a)aptld.org Skype: leonid.todorov Mob/WhatsApp: +7 963 623 4307 www.aptld.org APTLD on Twitter: https://twitter.com/aptldnews APTLD on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aptld/ -- Andrey Kolesnikov RIPN.NET

4 4

CCWG Accountability WS2
by Alan Greenberg Sept. 25, 2018

Sept. 25, 2018

As you might recall, we were scheduled to endorse the final report of the CCWG-Accountability WS2 in Panama, but we delayed that because the Board had expressed some reservations about several of the recommendations. These concerns were addressed by providing implementation guidelines. Accordingly, I will be proposing that the ALAC endorse the report. However, I note that in our comment to the last Public Comment on the consolidated report we said "The recommendations formulated in the various sections of this report all have merit in advancing ICANN's transparency and accountability. However, taken together, they may amount to a daunting burden on ICANN Org and its volunteer community. For this reason ALAC recommends that as the recommendations are implemented, ICANN takes an approach to minimize the impact and work associated with following these recommendations." I would suggest that we repeat this caveat in our ratification of the report. Subject to any comments received in the rest of this week (by Friday), I will open a BigPulse vote to ratify the CCWG-Accountability WS2 report next week. For your convenience, I am attaching the abbreviated report with the recommendations, the full report including all annexes and the implementation plan addressing the Board's concerns. Alan

9 8

KSK Rollover Board Decision
by Alan Greenberg Sept. 23, 2018

Sept. 23, 2018

https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2018-09-16-en#2.c

4 3

Planning for ATLAS-III
by Alan Greenberg Sept. 19, 2018

Sept. 19, 2018

In our pre-ICANN discussion with ICANN's President and CEO, Göran Marby, Maureen and I raised the issue of ATLAS III and the need to both begin our detailed planning and for a commitment from ICANN to allow the Meetings Team to make commitments for both meeting and hotel space. As some of you may have seen, he replied earlier this week. His letter is attached here and is posted to the ICANN Correspondence page (https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/correspondence) His reply was very supportive. I have now responded to his letter and a copy is attached. Our challenge is to now to organize and run a fantastic ATLAS that will meet the expectations we have set and for which we have received such a strong vote of confidence. Alan

17 18

IANA Naming Function Review ("IFR")
by Alan Greenberg Sept. 17, 2018

Sept. 17, 2018

The ALAC, along with other groups in ICANN, have been asked to appoint a representative to take part in the IANA Naming Function Review ("IFR") as per the attached letter. After due consideration, the ALAC has appointed Jean-Jacques Subrenat as its representative. Jean-Jacques is a former ALAC Member, former ICANN Board Member and was one of the two ALAC representatives on the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG), the group that oversaw the IANA Stewardship transition from the US Department of Commerce to ICANN. Alan

3 2

Fwd: Fellowship Selection Committee
by Alan Greenberg Sept. 15, 2018

Sept. 15, 2018

fyi >To: Alfredo Calderon <calderon.alfredo(a)gmail.com> >From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> >Subject: Fellowship Selection Committee >Cc: ALAC Internal List <alac-internal(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > >Alfredo, it is my pleasure to inform you that out of the eleven >candidates who applied to represent the ALAC on the new fellowship >Selection Committee, you have been selected to fulfill this roll for >the coming two years. > >On behalf of the ALAC, I offer my congratulations and best wishes. > >Warm regards, Alan

3 2

FINAL: SHORT Consensus Call: Fellowship Selection Criteria
by Alan Greenberg Sept. 13, 2018

Sept. 13, 2018

Here is the REVISED Criteria to be contributed by the ALAC for the new Fellowship Program. This version has been refined based on the comments submitted to the last version. With this message, I am initiating a SHORT Consensus Call of the ALAC to ratify the criteria document. This Consensus Call will end at 12:00 UTC on Friday, 14 September 2018. If there are any questions of comments, please direct them to either this list or to me directly. Although messages indicating support are welcome, they are not necessary. This Consensus Call will be deemed to have succeeded in the absence of significant opposition (greater than 20% as specified by ALAC RoP 12.3.3.1). Alan

5 9