October 2019 - ALAC - lists.icann.org

Fwd: [ICANN Community Leaders] 17 October Update
by Maureen Hilyard Oct. 17, 2019

Oct. 17, 2019

Thursday, 17 October 2019 ICANN Community Leadership Digest The ICANN org Policy Development Support team publishes this twice-weekly digest to help ICANN community leaders track requests and updates. Table of Contents ICANN66 Planning - ENDS TODAY: ICANN66 Prep Week - NEW: Evolving ICANN's Multistakeholder Model at ICANN66 - REMINDER: Prepare for ICANN66 - REMINDER: Finance Briefings at ICANN66 - REMINDER: Support the ICANN Engagement Booth at ICANN66 - SAVE THE DATE: ICANN66 Community Leadership Reception Information Sharing - ENDS TOMORROW: Invitation to Provide Feedback on the ICANN Board’s Proposed Public Interest Framework - REMINDER: ICANN Preparations for IGF 2019: Information for the Community and Requests for Input - REMINDER: 2020 Leadership Program Public Comment - Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review Team (CCT-RT) Accepted Recommendations – Plan for Implementation and Next Steps - Registration Directory Service (WHOIS2) Review Team Final Report - NEW: Proposed IANA SLAs for Publishing LGRs/IDN Tables - NEW: Draft PTI and IANA FY20 Operating Plan and Budgets ICANN66 Planning ENDS TODAY: ICANN66 Prep Week Executive: David Olive, Senior Vice President, Policy Development Support FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING ICANN66 Prep Week features a series of seven webinars to prepare the community ahead of the Annual General Meeting in November. See the schedule <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001zfHo8N453Iw-PjLqji3LgbUjR-5yiu4O4fOJx1Ky3HV5…> . NEW: Evolving ICANN's Multistakeholder Model at ICANN66 Executive: Theresa Swinehart, Senior Vice President, Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING At the Evolving ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model session during ICANN66, process facilitator Brian Cute will present a work plan outlining issues that the community believes may be hampering the more effective and efficient functioning of ICANN’s multistakeholder model of governance. Developed through Public Comment and community input, the work plan will identify who could be tasked to develop solutions, the resources needed, and the potential timelines for the work going forward. The final plan will become part of ICANN’s proposed five-year Operating Plan which will be published for Public Comment in December 2019. More information <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001zfHo8N453Iw-PjLqji3LgbUjR-5yiu4O4fOJx1Ky3HV5…>. Should your respective stakeholder group wish to schedule a meeting with Brian Cute in Montréal to discuss this process, please contact evolvingmsm(a)icann.org. REMINDER: Prepare for ICANN66 Executive: David Olive, Senior Vice President, Policy Development Support FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING Two reports are now available to help you prepare for ICANN66. - The Pre-ICANN66 Policy Report written by the Policy Development Support team provides a high-level overview of the planned work and activities of the Supporting Organizations, Advisory Committees, and Empowered Community at ICANN66. Read more. <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001zfHo8N453Iw-PjLqji3LgbUjR-5yiu4O4fOJx1Ky3HV5…> - The GNSO Policy Briefing is written by the GNSO support team specifically in preparation for ICANN Public Meetings to provide the community with concise background information on all relevant GNSO policy efforts. Read more. <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001zfHo8N453Iw-PjLqji3LgbUjR-5yiu4O4fOJx1Ky3HV5…> REMINDER: Finance Briefings at ICANN66 Executive: Xavier Calvez, Chief Financial Officer FOR: All Community Leaders ACTION ITEM The ICANN org Finance team would like to meet with the Supporting Organizations, Advisory Committees, Stakeholder Groups, Constituencies, and Regional At-Large Regional Organization groups at ICANN66 to present a short update on planning- and finance-related topics, including: - Five Year Operating Plan and Financial Plan - FY21 Operating Plan - FY19 Financials/FY20 Updates - Accountability and Transparency reporting – specific reports published by the ICANN org Finance team. Please let us know by Monday, 28 October 2019, if there are time slots that we can present. We appreciate your assistance. Becky Nash, becky.nash(a)icann.org Shani Quidwai, shani.quidwai(a)icann.org REMINDER: Support the ICANN Engagement Booth at ICANN66 Executive: Sally Costerton, Senior Vice President, Global Stakeholder Engagement FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING I know everyone is busy preparing for ICANN66, but I want to make you aware that you are welcome and encouraged to come and do outreach at the ICANN Engagement booth. The ICANN Engagement booth is in place so that Newcomers, ICANN org members, and ICANN community members to engage in discussions. It is supported by volunteers from the ICANN community, including members of Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees. It would be beneficial to have the presence of seasoned ICANN community members to share their knowledge. We would like to offer one-hour slots during ICANN66. Sign up here <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001zfHo8N453Iw-PjLqji3LgbUjR-5yiu4O4fOJx1Ky3HV5…> . Sincerely, Deborah Escalera SAVE THE DATE: ICANN66 Community Leadership Reception Executive: David Olive, Senior Vice President, Policy Development Support FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING The ICANN66 Community Leadership Reception with members of the ICANN Board and Executive Team will be held on Friday, 1 November 2019. More details including location and specific time will be shared later. Information Sharing ENDS TOMORROW: Invitation to Provide Feedback on the ICANN Board’s Proposed Public Interest Framework Executive: Sally Costerton, Senior Vice President, Global Stakeholder Engagement FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING >From 18 September – 18 October 2019, a community consultation is taking place on the global public interest framework proposed by the ICANN Board. In reviewing the proposal, the ICANN Board is asking the ICANN community to consider the following questions for input to the ICANN Board: 1. What are your thoughts on the proposed framework approach? Do you have any suggestions for how it could be improved? 2. What are your thoughts on the proposed approach for decisions in the ICANN ecosystem to be accompanied by a consideration of their impact on the global public interest (as well as an explanation regarding what is meant by the GPI in the specific case)? 3. How do you see this working for the Supporting Organization (SO), Advisory Committee (AC), constituency, group, review team, or cross-community working group (CCWG) to which you are contributing? The global public interest is central to many of ICANN’s primary governance documents, and the ICANN Board hopes to play a role in facilitating a bottom-up, community-driven process to develop a framework as a toolkit for the ICANN community to consider the global public interest. These considerations would not change the process by which decisions are made but could instead serve as tools for the community to reinforce the commitment to the public interest and to demonstrate how specific recommendations, advice, and public comments are in the global public interest. This includes the ICANN community guiding the ICANN Board about the public interest determination the latter must make in its decisions. To learn more about the framework, please read the discussion paper <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001zfHo8N453Iw-PjLqji3LgbUjR-5yiu4O4fOJx1Ky3HV5…>. Community feedback is welcome by Friday, 18 October 2019 via email at gpitoolkit(a)icann.org. After the community consultation, there will be a public session at ICANN66, followed by a Public Comment proceeding. For more information, visit: https://go.icann.org/2kMb7RB. REMINDER: ICANN Preparations for IGF 2019: Information for the Community and Requests for Input FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING The 14th Annual Meeting of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) will be hosted by the Government of Germany in Berlin from 25 to 29 November 2019. ICANN org will have a booth, hold sessions, and co-host a reception with other Internet technical organizations. A few things we would like to share with you: - ICANN booth – The booth will be a resource for the ICANN community. Please contact us (see below) if you or any of your members would like to volunteer at the booth, or use the booth as a place for small meet-ups, etc. Once we have a better idea, we will create a schedule reflecting this. - Technical community reception – Monday, 25 November 2019, 18:30-20:00 (IGF venue). Space will be limited, and the reception will be by invitation only. Please send us (see below) the names of any community members attending the IGF and they will receive an invitation. Deadline: Tuesday, 12 November 2019. - Community sessions – Please send us (see below) details of any session at the IGF your community group and members are planning, and we will share this information online and at the ICANN booth. ICANN sessions IGF Day 0 Pre-Events: Monday, 25 November 2019 - 15:05-14:35 | Workshop: The evolving ecosystem: ICANN's role in the security and stability of the Internet <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001zfHo8N453Iw-PjLqji3LgbUjR-5yiu4O4fOJx1Ky3HV5…> IGF Day 1: Tuesday, 26 November 2019 - 10:45-11:45 | ICANN Open Forum: ICANN - DNS, Threats and Opportunities <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001zfHo8N453Iw-PjLqji3LgbUjR-5yiu4O4fOJx1Ky3HV5…> IGF Day 3: Thursday 28 November 2019 - 11:05-12:35 | Workshop: Online Identity in the Multilingual Domain Name Space <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001zfHo8N453Iw-PjLqji3LgbUjR-5yiu4O4fOJx1Ky3HV5…> ICANN org contact for community members and requests: Adam Peake, adam.peake(a)icann.org. REMINDER: 2020 Leadership Program From: Sally Costerton, Senior Vice President, Global Stakeholder Engagement FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING >From Wednesday, 2 October to Friday, 15 November 2019, ICANN has issued a call for nominations for the 2020 Leadership Program, scheduled for 5–6 March in Cancún, Mexico, just prior to ICANN67. The Leadership Program helps current and incoming leaders better understand the complexities of ICANN, while also helping to develop the facilitation skills of participants. Understanding ICANN as an organization, the topics discussed within ICANN, and the interaction within other stakeholder groups can be challenging for incoming leaders, but sometimes also for experienced leaders. ICANN org and the community are making considerable efforts to help incoming leaders have a good start to their terms and to provide current leaders the opportunity to strengthen their leadership and facilitation skills. Opportunities for Leadership Program participants include the following: - Meet leaders from the other Supporting Organizations/Advisory Committees and get an insight of the functionality and issues in other groups - Discuss current ICANN topics in an in-depth manner - Deepen the understanding of key ICANN processes - Develop facilitation and leadership skills, focused personal effectiveness to run meetings and foster processes Interested individuals need to be endorsed by their Supporting Organization, Advisory Committee, or stakeholder group. Please register here <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001zfHo8N453Iw-PjLqji3LgbUjR-5yiu4O4fOJx1Ky3HV5…> by Friday, 15 November 2019, 23:59 UTC. The Leadership Program does not provide financial support for travel to Cancún but does cover accommodations and offer a stipend for the days a participant is involved in the program. Public Comment Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review Team (CCT-RT) Accepted Recommendations – Plan for Implementation and Next Steps <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001zfHo8N453Iw-PjLqji3LgbUjR-5yiu4O4fOJx1Ky3HV5…> Close Date: Monday, 21 October 2019 Registration Directory Service (WHOIS2) Review Team F <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001zfHo8N453Iw-PjLqji3LgbUjR-5yiu4O4fOJx1Ky3HV5…>inal Report <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001zfHo8N453Iw-PjLqji3LgbUjR-5yiu4O4fOJx1Ky3HV5…> Close Date: Monday, 25 November 2019 NEW: Proposed IANA SLAs for Publishing LGRs/IDN Tables <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001zfHo8N453Iw-PjLqji3LgbUjR-5yiu4O4fOJx1Ky3HV5…> Close Date: Monday, 25 November 2019 NEW: Draft PTI and IANA FY20 Operating Plan and Budgets <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001zfHo8N453Iw-PjLqji3LgbUjR-5yiu4O4fOJx1Ky3HV5…> Close Date: Wednesday, 27 November 2019 Volume 1, Issue 59 | Archive <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001zfHo8N453Iw-PjLqji3LgbUjR-5yiu4O4fOJx1Ky3HV5…> | Next Issue: Monday, 21 October 2019 ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Unsubscribe so-ac-sg-cleaders(a)icann.org <https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=un&m=00115LrDzKl3LoTB9FWCDiE2A%3D&…> Update Profile <https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=oo&m=00115LrDzKl3LoTB9FWCDiE2A%3D&…> | About Constant Contact <http://www.constantcontact.com/legal/about-constant-contact> Sent by david.olive(a)icann.org in collaboration with [image: Trusted Email from Constant Contact - Try it FREE today.] <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=nge&rmc=VF19_3GE> Try email marketing for free today! <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=nge&rmc=VF19_3GE> _______________________________________________ SO-AC-SG-CLeaders mailing list SO-AC-SG-CLeaders(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

1 0

Re: [ALAC] [community] ALAC > Action items: 2019-10-09 Consolidated Policy Working Group Call
by Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi Oct. 17, 2019

Oct. 17, 2019

Dear All, Please note that the statement will be closed for any comments/feedback/edits at 12:00 UTC Friday,18th October, so that staff has time to format and submit. Kindly provide your feedback before this. [ The public interest is more of a political concept that usually accompanies other main principles like transparency and accountability. As mentioned in the paper there were many attempts in the past to define the public interest in relation to ICANN's remit that did not succeed. This is understandable because generally speaking it is difficult to pin down exactly what public interest means. Usually we look at the public interest in relation to the common good and common interest. The public interest in relation to ICANN's work should be scope and purpose specific. Therefore, trying to identify the public interest in relation to specific purposes or instances and how these instances link to ICANN's work as defined by its mission and bylaws makes sense. Also, in determining the public interest one should not only look at the outcome, but also at the process and procedures that led to the outcome and the proposed framework, takes into consideration ICANN's multistakeholder community and the policy development process. So, conceptually speaking the tool developed seems logical, however the problem lies in how we practically apply it or make use of it. In an attempt to actually use the tool, one could argue that two stakeholder groups with opposite opinions on the same subject matter could equally use the tool and each prove that his decision or comment is in the public interest. This is because both opinions could be complying with the mission and bylaws. Using the tool to justify one position over the other could prove in some cases to be not useful. However, after reaching a certain decision, the tool could be used to make sure that the decision or comment is in the public interest. To conclude the proposed GPI tool could be useful in determining what is not in the public interest and in noting how an already taken decision or comment serves the public interest. However, it will be challenging to use the tool to favor one path over another. ] Thank you Hadia Eng. Hadia Elminiawi (M.Sc.) Director, DNS-Entrepreneurship Center [Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/268513_1801528887076…] National Telecommunication Regulatory Authority Tel: +202 3534 4392 Fax: +202 3537 4000 Email: hadia(a)tra.gov.eg<https://mail.dnsec.eg/owa/redir.aspx?C=8f4aa197b9f840be8139d76b29a0df99&URL…> From: Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 12:25 PM To: 'cpwg(a)icann.org' Cc: ALAC Subject: RE: [community] ALAC > Action items: 2019-10-09 Consolidated Policy Working Group Call Dear All, Please find herein the final draft for the comment on the public interest framework, I have also updated the wiki page. Please take note that we shall need to post it tomorrow. Thanks The public interest is more of a political concept that usually accompanies other main principles like transparency and accountability. As mentioned in the paper there were many attempts in the past to define the public interest in relation to ICANN's remit that did not succeed. This is understandable because generally speaking it is difficult to pin down exactly what public interest means. Usually we look at the public interest in relation to the common good and common interest. The public interest in relation to ICANN's work should be scope and purpose specific. Therefore, trying to identify the public interest in relation to specific purposes or instances and how these instances link to ICANN's work as defined by its mission and bylaws makes sense. Also, in determining the public interest one should not only look at the outcome, but also at the process and procedures that led to the outcome and the proposed framework, takes into consideration ICANN's multistakeholder community and the policy development process. So, Conceptually speaking the tool developed seems logical, however the problem lies in how we practically apply it or make use of it. In an attempt to actually use the tool, one could argue that two stakeholder groups with opposite opinions on the same subject matter could equally use the tool and each prove that his decision or comment is in the public interest. This is because both opinions could be complying with the mission and bylaws. Using the tool to justify one position over the other could prove in some cases to be not useful. However, after reaching a certain decision, the tool could be used to make sure that the decision or comment is in the public interest. To conclude the proposed GPI tool could be useful in determining what is not in the public interest and in noting how an already taken decision or comment serves the public interest. However, it will be challenging to use the tool to favor one path over another. Eng. Hadia Elminiawi (M.Sc.) Director, DNS-Entrepreneurship Center [Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/268513_1801528887076…] National Telecommunication Regulatory Authority Tel: +202 3534 4392 Fax: +202 3537 4000 Email: hadia(a)tra.gov.eg<https://mail.dnsec.eg/owa/redir.aspx?C=8f4aa197b9f840be8139d76b29a0df99&URL…> From: Evin Erdogdu (Confluence) [mailto:no-reply@icann.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 3:00 PM To: Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi Subject: [community] ALAC > Action items: 2019-10-09 Consolidated Policy Working Group Call There's 6 new edits on this page [page icon]<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Action+items%3A+2019-10-09+Cons…> Action items: 2019-10-09 Consolidated Policy Working Group Call<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Action+items%3A+2019-10-09+Cons…> [cid:image007.png@01D584EE.BB7927E0] Evin Erdogdu edited this page Here's what changed: [☑] @Hadia Elminiawi</display/~hadia.elminiawi>to send EPDP II update (regarding blocks, et al) to the CPWG mailing list. [☑] @Justine Chew</display/~justine.chew> to continue with SubPro Deliberations - Appeals - on next CPWG call, with the following suggestion to be discussed on mailing list in the interim: What At-Large members have said in SubPro, could be put forward to ALAC: 1. ALAC has no funding ability beyond that supplied by ICANN. It is not feasible for ALAC to raise funds to finance an appeal or to bear costs if appeal is unsuccessful. Thus, it would be discriminatory to constrain ALAC from exercising its right to appeal because of no funding. Quantum/limits? Must commensurate with number of applications. The same argument could apply to ALAC's ability to file Objection.  [☑] GeoNames Survey content and GeoNames video to be circulated next week (prior to next CPWG). @Jonathan Zuck</display/~jonathan.zuck> / @Evin Erdogdu</display/~evin.erdogdu> [☑] CPWG / At-Large to comment on ICANN66 Talking Points<https://drive.google.com/a/icann.org/file/d/1RaplmZAmAPnbVlm0L-3F3uDjcokeUL…>. @Evin Erdogdu</display/~evin.erdogdu>to circulate on CPWG mailing list. [☐] Hadia suggested adding Public Interest to the CPWG Ingest Process, under Remit. CC @Jonathan Zuck</display/~jonathan.zuck> to move ALAC above policy remit as per Holly's recommendation; to add prose in between slides. [☑] @Evin Erdogdu</display/~evin.erdogdu> to submit Next Steps to Improve the Effectiveness of ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=115642395> once finalized by penholder(s) / ALAC Chair. [☑] @Maureen Hilyard</display/~maureen.hilyard> to submit Amazon Public Interest Commitments (PICs) 2019<https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Workspace%3A+Ama…> comment from CPWG/At-Large by 14 Oct. CC: @Evin Erdogdu</display/~evin.erdogdu> [☑] @Hadia Elminiawi</display/~hadia.elminiawi> to draft Invitation to Provide Feedback on the ICANN Board’s Proposed Public Interest Framework<https://community.icann.org/x/aZQCBw> based off comments on wiki page [☑] @Evin Erdogdu</display/~evin.erdogdu> to circulate Invitation to Provide Feedback on the ICANN Board’s Proposed Public Interest Framework<https://community.icann.org/x/aZQCBw> workspace on the mailing list for comment. [☑] @Claudia Ruiz</display/~claudia.ruiz> / support team to set up next call for 16 Oct 13:00 UTC. Go to page history<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpreviousversions.action?pageId=117609…> View page<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Action+items%3A+2019-10-09+Cons…> Stop watching space<https://community.icann.org/users/removespacenotification.action?spaceKey=a…> • Manage notifications<https://community.icann.org/users/editmyemailsettings.action?src=mail&src.m…> This message was sent by Atlassian Confluence 6.15.8

1 0

Re: [ALAC] [community] ALAC > Action items: 2019-10-09 Consolidated Policy Working Group Call
by Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi Oct. 17, 2019

Oct. 17, 2019

Dear All, Please find herein the final draft for the comment on the public interest framework, I have also updated the wiki page. Please take note that we shall need to post it tomorrow. Thanks The public interest is more of a political concept that usually accompanies other main principles like transparency and accountability. As mentioned in the paper there were many attempts in the past to define the public interest in relation to ICANN's remit that did not succeed. This is understandable because generally speaking it is difficult to pin down exactly what public interest means. Usually we look at the public interest in relation to the common good and common interest. The public interest in relation to ICANN's work should be scope and purpose specific. Therefore, trying to identify the public interest in relation to specific purposes or instances and how these instances link to ICANN's work as defined by its mission and bylaws makes sense. Also, in determining the public interest one should not only look at the outcome, but also at the process and procedures that led to the outcome and the proposed framework, takes into consideration ICANN's multistakeholder community and the policy development process. So, Conceptually speaking the tool developed seems logical, however the problem lies in how we practically apply it or make use of it. In an attempt to actually use the tool, one could argue that two stakeholder groups with opposite opinions on the same subject matter could equally use the tool and each prove that his decision or comment is in the public interest. This is because both opinions could be complying with the mission and bylaws. Using the tool to justify one position over the other could prove in some cases to be not useful. However, after reaching a certain decision, the tool could be used to make sure that the decision or comment is in the public interest. To conclude the proposed GPI tool could be useful in determining what is not in the public interest and in noting how an already taken decision or comment serves the public interest. However, it will be challenging to use the tool to favor one path over another. Eng. Hadia Elminiawi (M.Sc.) Director, DNS-Entrepreneurship Center [Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/268513_1801528887076…] National Telecommunication Regulatory Authority Tel: +202 3534 4392 Fax: +202 3537 4000 Email: hadia(a)tra.gov.eg<https://mail.dnsec.eg/owa/redir.aspx?C=8f4aa197b9f840be8139d76b29a0df99&URL…> From: Evin Erdogdu (Confluence) [mailto:no-reply@icann.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 3:00 PM To: Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi Subject: [community] ALAC > Action items: 2019-10-09 Consolidated Policy Working Group Call There's 6 new edits on this page [page icon]<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Action+items%3A+2019-10-09+Cons…> Action items: 2019-10-09 Consolidated Policy Working Group Call<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Action+items%3A+2019-10-09+Cons…> [cid:image010.png@01D584E5.E3442990] Evin Erdogdu edited this page Here's what changed: [☑] @Hadia Elminiawi</display/~hadia.elminiawi>to send EPDP II update (regarding blocks, et al) to the CPWG mailing list. [☑] @Justine Chew</display/~justine.chew> to continue with SubPro Deliberations - Appeals - on next CPWG call, with the following suggestion to be discussed on mailing list in the interim: What At-Large members have said in SubPro, could be put forward to ALAC: 1. ALAC has no funding ability beyond that supplied by ICANN. It is not feasible for ALAC to raise funds to finance an appeal or to bear costs if appeal is unsuccessful. Thus, it would be discriminatory to constrain ALAC from exercising its right to appeal because of no funding. Quantum/limits? Must commensurate with number of applications. The same argument could apply to ALAC's ability to file Objection.  [☑] GeoNames Survey content and GeoNames video to be circulated next week (prior to next CPWG). @Jonathan Zuck</display/~jonathan.zuck> / @Evin Erdogdu</display/~evin.erdogdu> [☑] CPWG / At-Large to comment on ICANN66 Talking Points<https://drive.google.com/a/icann.org/file/d/1RaplmZAmAPnbVlm0L-3F3uDjcokeUL…>. @Evin Erdogdu</display/~evin.erdogdu>to circulate on CPWG mailing list. [☐] Hadia suggested adding Public Interest to the CPWG Ingest Process, under Remit. CC @Jonathan Zuck</display/~jonathan.zuck> to move ALAC above policy remit as per Holly's recommendation; to add prose in between slides. [☑] @Evin Erdogdu</display/~evin.erdogdu> to submit Next Steps to Improve the Effectiveness of ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=115642395> once finalized by penholder(s) / ALAC Chair. [☑] @Maureen Hilyard</display/~maureen.hilyard> to submit Amazon Public Interest Commitments (PICs) 2019<https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Workspace%3A+Ama…> comment from CPWG/At-Large by 14 Oct. CC: @Evin Erdogdu</display/~evin.erdogdu> [☑] @Hadia Elminiawi</display/~hadia.elminiawi> to draft Invitation to Provide Feedback on the ICANN Board’s Proposed Public Interest Framework<https://community.icann.org/x/aZQCBw> based off comments on wiki page [☑] @Evin Erdogdu</display/~evin.erdogdu> to circulate Invitation to Provide Feedback on the ICANN Board’s Proposed Public Interest Framework<https://community.icann.org/x/aZQCBw> workspace on the mailing list for comment. [☑] @Claudia Ruiz</display/~claudia.ruiz> / support team to set up next call for 16 Oct 13:00 UTC. Go to page history<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpreviousversions.action?pageId=117609…> View page<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Action+items%3A+2019-10-09+Cons…> Stop watching space<https://community.icann.org/users/removespacenotification.action?spaceKey=a…> • Manage notifications<https://community.icann.org/users/editmyemailsettings.action?src=mail&src.m…> This message was sent by Atlassian Confluence 6.15.8

1 0

ACTION/CPWG by 21 October - Subsequent Procedures: ALAC's right and ability to file Objections to applications/applicants in new round, and Appeals against any decision not in favour of ALAC
by Justine Chew Oct. 17, 2019

Oct. 17, 2019

*Please provide further input (if any) by 21 October 12:00 UTC.* Dear CPWG colleagues, At yesterday's CPWG call, it was decided that a final call for feedback be made to this list on the proposed response to SubPro PDP WG on the question of *"Should ALAC have standing and funding to file an appeal (in Subsequent Procedures)?"* Further to the email trail below, I presented a revised proposed response at the said CPWG call to address 2 additional points which were mentioned in my explanatory email below - i.e. (1) reference to the contemplated "loser pays" model and (2) standing to file. Ref: Slide deck for Agenda item 7, 1st bullet at https://community.icann.org/x/F4AzBw <https://www.google.com/url?q=https://community.icann.org/x/F4AzBw&sa=D&usd=…> So, the proposed response now reads (key amendments underlined), “The ALAC has no funding ability beyond that supplied by ICANN. It is not feasible for the ALAC to raise funds to finance an appeal (or objection) or to bear costs *under a “loser pays” model* if its appeal is unsuccessful. Any withholding of ICANN funding for the ALAC to file objections and/or appeals would be tantamount to denying ALAC the ability to fulfill its duty under the Bylaws as the primary organisational constituency for the voice and concerns of the individual Internet user. As to any contemplated limits to the number of appeals or quantum of ICANN funding to ALAC in light of ICANN budgetary constraints, the ALAC believes that its ICANN funding must commensurate with number of applications received. *The question of standing for the ALAC to file an objection and appeal is beyond the scope of the Subsequent Procedures PDP WG. It is a question for the ALAC to consider and the Dispute Resolution Service Provider and Appeals Arbiter to determine in respect of an objection and appeal, respectively*.” If you have any (further) input to the draft above, please provide the same by 21 October 12:00 UTC. After that, I will finalize the response (if necessary) and relay the same to SubPro PDP WG for their attention. (I have noted earlier comments of support from Marita Moll, Evan Leibovitch and Maureen Hilyard in a separate thread; and my apologies for cross-posting) Thank you, Justine Chew ----- On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 at 04:57, Jonathan Zuck <JZuck(a)innovatorsnetwork.org> wrote: > Agree > > Jonathan Zuck > Executive Director > Innovators Network Foundation > www.Innovatorsnetwork.org > ------------------------------ > *From:* GTLD-WG <gtld-wg-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of > Justine Chew <justine.chew(a)gmail.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 9, 2019 5:07:44 PM > *To:* CPWG <cpwg(a)icann.org> > *Subject:* [GTLD-WG] [CPWG] Subsequent Procedures: ALAC's right and > ability to file Objections to applications/applicants in new round, and > Appeals against any decision not in favour of ALAC > > Just to provide further context, > > When we speak of "Accountability Mechanism" in SubPro, we are referring to > appeals mechanism essentially, and the idea of recommending the > establishment of a new appeals mechanism/layer, which would apply strictly > to any upcoming New gTLD Program round. Not to be confused with the > existing Accountability Mechanism under the ICANN Bylaws, yet considering > whether mechanisms like Request for Reconsideration and Independent Review > Panels would be applicable to decisions arising under the Program and under > what circumstances those would or would not be applicable. > > I would prefer to keep the question of whether a new appeals mechanism is > desirable or not independent to the question of ALAC's right to file > Objections and Appeals. The Objections mechanism is still going to be > outsourced to third-party Dispute Resolution Service Providers (DRSP) for > the new round because of reliance on their expertise, while the right to > appeal will be likely involve such DRSP anyway. > > *Now, addressing strictly what applies to ALAC/At-Large in respect of > Objections*, > > 1. In the 2012 round, there effectively wasn't any *substantive* appeal > mechanism available to ALAC (or any objector or applicant, for that matter) > to appeal against an unfavourable decision by a third-party Objection > DRSP. Under the 2012 AGB, ALAC was able to file Limited Public Interest > Objections or Community Objections with funding provided by ICANN, and as > pointed out by Alan, Olivier and Cheryl at the CPWG call of 9 Oct, ALAC > filed 3 objections with respect to the .health string. > > 2. In the SubPro Initial Report of 3 July 2018, a question was posed to > the community. > > *"*Q. 2.8.1.e.10 *ICANN agreed to fund any objections filed by the ALAC > in the 2012 round. Should this continue to be the case moving forward? > Please explain. If this does continue, should any limits be placed on such > funding, and if so what limits? Should ICANN continue to fund the ALAC or > any party to file objections on behalf of others?"* > > > In response, vide its Statement of 3 October 2018 (see: > https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=88573813) ALAC > said, > > *"Yes, the ALAC believes strongly that ICANN should continue to fund all > objections filed by us in the future rounds. As ICANN’s primary > organisational constituency for the voice and concerns of the individual > Internet user, the ALAC bears a responsibility as an established > institution to pursue Limited Public Interest and/or Community objections > against applications for New gTLDs which it believes does not benefit > individual Internet end users as a whole.* > > *The existing limits or conditions placed on funding for ALAC objection > filing and Dispute Resolution Procedure (DRP) costs already form an arduous > “stress test” to not only establish the validity of a contemplated > Community objection, but also support for it within At-Large.* > > *However, for ALAC objections to have proper effect as intended in the > AGB, the ALAC proposes that guidance for DRSP panellists be substantial in > respect of adopting definitions of terms – such as “community” and “public > interest” – as well as questions on objector standing, in an effort to > limit the ‘damage’ resulting from panellists’ unfamiliarity with the ICANN > Community structure, divergent panellists’ views, even values, on the same, > and which conflict with the goals stated in ICANN’s Bylaws or GNSO > consensus policy."* > > > 3. In the SubPro PDP WG deliberations of all public comments received to > the said Initial Report, questions again arose as to whether ICANN *[sic]* should > continue to fund objections to be filed by ALAC in subsequent procedure, > and if yes, to what extent. This is because there were public comments > which basically questioned why ALAC should have "special rights" (standing > versus funding) to file objections. > > In my opinion, *the question of ALAC's standing should not be considered > in SubPro deliberations* -- that is a question for ALAC itself > (considered through ALAC's INTERNAL process for determining whether an > objection should be filed) and a question for the Objection DRSP (it has > been the ground of dismissal for ALAC's prior objections ie "ALAC having no > standing to object"). > > *On the question of funding, we now have a choice whether to reinforce the > ALAC statement (as presented above) or consider recanting ie giving up the > fight to keep the right to file objections in new rounds*. > > *And addressing strictly what applies to ALAC/At-Large in respect of > Appeals*, > > 4. In the SubPro PDP WG deliberations a consequent question was raised in > mooting the recommendation for a new appeals mechanism -- if ICANN were to > fund objections to be filed by ALAC in the new round, should ICANN also > fund the costs of appeals to be filed by ALAC against any decision rendered > that was unfavourable to ALAC (on a loser-pay model)? > > 5. This is where the discussion in the CPWG call of 9 Oct has progressed > to. I noted that there is support for the retention of right to file > objections which ought be accompanied by the right to file appeals. > Therefore, a draft position was presented and which I have now refined for > feedback / further refinement ... > > *The ALAC has no funding ability beyond that supplied by ICANN. It is not > feasible for ALAC to raise funds to finance an appeal (or objection) or to > bear costs if its appeal is unsuccessful. Any withholding of ICANN funding > for ALAC to file objections and/or appeals would be tantamount to denying > ALAC the ability to fulfill its duty under the Bylaws as the** primary > organisational constituency for the voice and concerns of the individual > Internet user. **As to quantum for or limits to such ICANN funding in > light of ICANN budgetary constraints, ALAC believes that it must > commensurate with number of applications received.* > > 6. An aside note -- the notion of appeals would also be available to > appeal against *evaluation* decisions, such as the ones made by panels > for the Applicant Support Program and CPE. > > Apologies for the long email and thank you for your attention. > > Justine > ----- > > > On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 00:11, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> > wrote: > >> I would like to raise the issue of the ALAC ability to object to >> applications as well as its ability to appeal such judgements. >> >> In the last round, the ALAC filed three objections with one of them later >> being withdrawn. All were to *.health*. >> >> *I believe that the ALAC needs to formally determine if it wants such >> objection rights in future gTLD rounds*. If we do want that right, I >> believe that we also need the right to appeal and in both cases, if we are >> not funded by ICANN, then the right is meaningless. >> >> I do not have copies of the objections we filed, but for the two cases >> where there were judgements (against us), they can be found at: >> >> >> https://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/drsp/17jan14/determination-1… >> ; >> >> https://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/drsp/17jan14/determination-1… >> . >> >> I believe that the ALAC decsiion should be based on the past history and >> on whether we truly believe that we will allocate appropriate resources to >> such a future action. >> >> In aid of that, I suggest the CPWG, and more importantly the ALAC, be >> quickly briefed by Olivier (who as ALAC Chair was the point person in the >> earlier objections) on the history and efforts associated with the three >> .health objections. >> >> I may be on today's call but if so, only for part of it. >> >> Alan >> >> At 06/10/2019 11:00 AM, Justine Chew wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> Reference is made to the *SubPro Updates workspace* >> <https://community.icann.org/x/6a_jBg>. >> >> The Subsequent Procedures PDP WG has started deliberating on public >> comments received on the topic of Accountability Mechanism on 1 Oct 2019. >> Deliberations will continue on its next call on 7 Oct at 15:00 UTC. >> >> Here is an *update on the topic of Accountability Mechanism as at 5 Oct >> 2019* >> <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/111390697/01.%20SubPro%20A…>. >> >> >> Please note that while "Accountability Mechanism" is better associated >> with mechanism per the Bylaws, namely Request for Reconsideration, >> Independent Review Process and ICANN Ombudsman, within the SubPro context, >> "Accountability Mechanism" is about appeals for the new gTLD Program -- >> looking at rights and forms of appeals to decisions made during evaluation, >> objections, either by ICANN Org/Board, external evaluators, external third >> party Dispute Resolution Service Providers (DRSPs), as well as in respect >> of post-delegation dispute resolution procedures. >> >> CCT Recommendation #35 is picked up under this topic, specifically >> sub-recommendation (3) "*Introducing a post dispute resolution panel >> review mechanism*". >> >> As I alluded to at the CPWG call of 26 Sep under the topic of Objections, >> there were public comments which suggested that ALAC's ability to file >> Objections in subsequent procedures be explicitly limited on account of >> budgetary constraint. >> >> Along the same lines, a question was raised during the last SubPro WG >> call as to whether AC's should be funded by ICANN to file appeals. This is >> something which may require addressing either through a position relayed to >> SubPro WG momentarily and/or in any statement in response to the call for >> public comments to SubPro WG's final report in due course. >> >> On that note, I wish you a pleasant week ahead. >> >> Justine Chew >> ----- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CPWG mailing list >> CPWG(a)icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg >> >> _______________________________________________ >> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your >> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance >> with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) >> and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) >> You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or >> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or >> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. >> _______________________________________________ >> GTLD-WG mailing list >> GTLD-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg >> >> Working Group direct URL: >> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs >> _______________________________________________ >> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your >> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance >> with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) >> and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) >> You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or >> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or >> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. >> >> >

1 0

Re: [ALAC] [registration-issues-wg] [CPWG] Subsequent Procedures: ALAC's right and ability to file Objections to applications/applicants in new round, and Appeals against any decision not in favour of ALAC
by Justine Chew Oct. 11, 2019

Oct. 11, 2019

Thank you very much, Carlton, for your comments. Might others in CPWG have input on this issue? In any case, the plan is to take this up again at next week's CPWG call to form a concrete response (if any) (Apologies for cross-posting) Thanks, Justine ----- On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 22:35, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Justine. Another yeoman's task accomplished with aplomb! > > In my view the right to file objections is established and the right to > file appeals in those cases simply affirms the course of natural justice > and thusly, should too be established. In similar vein, a right to file an > appeal on an evaluation decision pertaining community-type applications for > any ASP booted in the coming round would be in the At-Large's interest. > > That the caviling will coalesce around money is inevitable. I certainly > think that if these were to be privileged via the SubPro WG > recommendations, then the WG ought to follow the lines of the CCT RT > Recommendation #35 and referenced broadly on Byelaw-mandated > responsibilities rather than specifying AC's. > > -Carlton > > ============================== > *Carlton A Samuels* > > *Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & > Turnaround* > ============================= > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 6:38 AM Justine Chew <justine.chew(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Just to provide further context, >> >> When we speak of "Accountability Mechanism" in SubPro, we are referring >> to appeals mechanism essentially, and the idea of recommending the >> establishment of a new appeals mechanism/layer, which would apply strictly >> to any upcoming New gTLD Program round. Not to be confused with the >> existing Accountability Mechanism under the ICANN Bylaws, yet considering >> whether mechanisms like Request for Reconsideration and Independent Review >> Panels would be applicable to decisions arising under the Program and under >> what circumstances those would or would not be applicable. >> >> I would prefer to keep the question of whether a new appeals mechanism is >> desirable or not independent to the question of ALAC's right to file >> Objections and Appeals. The Objections mechanism is still going to be >> outsourced to third-party Dispute Resolution Service Providers (DRSP) for >> the new round because of reliance on their expertise, while the right to >> appeal will be likely involve such DRSP anyway. >> >> *Now, addressing strictly what applies to ALAC/At-Large in respect of >> Objections*, >> >> 1. In the 2012 round, there effectively wasn't any *substantive* appeal >> mechanism available to ALAC (or any objector or applicant, for that matter) >> to appeal against an unfavourable decision by a third-party Objection >> DRSP. Under the 2012 AGB, ALAC was able to file Limited Public Interest >> Objections or Community Objections with funding provided by ICANN, and as >> pointed out by Alan, Olivier and Cheryl at the CPWG call of 9 Oct, ALAC >> filed 3 objections with respect to the .health string. >> >> 2. In the SubPro Initial Report of 3 July 2018, a question was posed to >> the community. >> >> *"*Q. 2.8.1.e.10 *ICANN agreed to fund any objections filed by the ALAC >> in the 2012 round. Should this continue to be the case moving forward? >> Please explain. If this does continue, should any limits be placed on such >> funding, and if so what limits? Should ICANN continue to fund the ALAC or >> any party to file objections on behalf of others?"* >> >> >> In response, vide its Statement of 3 October 2018 (see: >> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=88573813) ALAC >> said, >> >> *"Yes, the ALAC believes strongly that ICANN should continue to fund all >> objections filed by us in the future rounds. As ICANN’s primary >> organisational constituency for the voice and concerns of the individual >> Internet user, the ALAC bears a responsibility as an established >> institution to pursue Limited Public Interest and/or Community objections >> against applications for New gTLDs which it believes does not benefit >> individual Internet end users as a whole.* >> >> *The existing limits or conditions placed on funding for ALAC objection >> filing and Dispute Resolution Procedure (DRP) costs already form an arduous >> “stress test” to not only establish the validity of a contemplated >> Community objection, but also support for it within At-Large.* >> >> *However, for ALAC objections to have proper effect as intended in the >> AGB, the ALAC proposes that guidance for DRSP panellists be substantial in >> respect of adopting definitions of terms – such as “community” and “public >> interest” – as well as questions on objector standing, in an effort to >> limit the ‘damage’ resulting from panellists’ unfamiliarity with the ICANN >> Community structure, divergent panellists’ views, even values, on the same, >> and which conflict with the goals stated in ICANN’s Bylaws or GNSO >> consensus policy."* >> >> >> 3. In the SubPro PDP WG deliberations of all public comments received to >> the said Initial Report, questions again arose as to whether ALAC should >> continue to fund objections to be filed by ALAC in subsequent procedure, >> and if yes, to what extent. This is because there were public comments >> which basically questioned why ALAC should have "special rights" (standing >> versus funding) to file objections. >> >> In my opinion, *the question of ALAC's standing should not be considered >> in SubPro deliberations* -- that is a question for ALAC itself >> (considered through ALAC's INTERNAL process for determining whether an >> objection should be filed) and a question for the Objection DRSP (it has >> been the ground of dismissal for ALAC's prior objections ie "ALAC having no >> standing to object"). >> >> *On the question of funding, we now have a choice whether to reinforce >> the ALAC statement (as presented above) or consider recanting ie giving up >> the fight to keep the right to file objections in new rounds*. >> >> *And addressing strictly what applies to ALAC/At-Large in respect of >> Appeals*, >> >> 4. In the SubPro PDP WG deliberations a consequent question was raised in >> mooting the recommendation for a new appeals mechanism -- if ICANN were to >> fund objections to be filed by ALAC in the new round, should ICANN also >> fund the costs of appeals to be filed by ALAC against any decision rendered >> that was unfavourable to ALAC (on a loser-pay model)? >> >> 5. This is where the discussion in the CPWG call of 9 Oct has progressed >> to. I noted that there is support for the retention of right to file >> objections which ought be accompanied by the right to file appeals. >> Therefore, a draft position was presented and which I have now refined for >> feedback / further refinement ... >> >> *The ALAC has no funding ability beyond that supplied by ICANN. It is not >> feasible for ALAC to raise funds to finance an appeal (or objection) or to >> bear costs if its appeal is unsuccessful. Any withholding of ICANN funding >> for ALAC to file objections and/or appeals would be tantamount to denying >> ALAC the ability to fulfill its duty under the Bylaws as the** primary >> organisational constituency for the voice and concerns of the individual >> Internet user. **As to quantum for or limits to such ICANN funding in >> light of ICANN budgetary constraints, ALAC believes that it must >> commensurate with number of applications received.* >> >> 6. An aside note -- the notion of appeals would also be available to >> appeal against *evaluation* decisions, such as the ones made by panels >> for the Applicant Support Program and CPE. >> >> Apologies for the long email and thank you for your attention. >> >> Justine >> ----- >> >> >> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 00:11, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> >> wrote: >> >>> I would like to raise the issue of the ALAC ability to object to >>> applications as well as its ability to appeal such judgements. >>> >>> In the last round, the ALAC filed three objections with one of them >>> later being withdrawn. All were to *.health*. >>> >>> *I believe that the ALAC needs to formally determine if it wants such >>> objection rights in future gTLD rounds*. If we do want that right, I >>> believe that we also need the right to appeal and in both cases, if we are >>> not funded by ICANN, then the right is meaningless. >>> >>> I do not have copies of the objections we filed, but for the two cases >>> where there were judgements (against us), they can be found at: >>> >>> >>> https://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/drsp/17jan14/determination-1… >>> ; >>> >>> https://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/drsp/17jan14/determination-1… >>> . >>> >>> I believe that the ALAC decsiion should be based on the past history and >>> on whether we truly believe that we will allocate appropriate resources to >>> such a future action. >>> >>> In aid of that, I suggest the CPWG, and more importantly the ALAC, be >>> quickly briefed by Olivier (who as ALAC Chair was the point person in the >>> earlier objections) on the history and efforts associated with the three >>> .health objections. >>> >>> I may be on today's call but if so, only for part of it. >>> >>> Alan >>> >>> At 06/10/2019 11:00 AM, Justine Chew wrote: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> Reference is made to the *SubPro Updates workspace* >>> <https://community.icann.org/x/6a_jBg>. >>> >>> The Subsequent Procedures PDP WG has started deliberating on public >>> comments received on the topic of Accountability Mechanism on 1 Oct 2019. >>> Deliberations will continue on its next call on 7 Oct at 15:00 UTC. >>> >>> Here is an *update on the topic of Accountability Mechanism as at 5 Oct >>> 2019* >>> <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/111390697/01.%20SubPro%20A…>. >>> >>> >>> Please note that while "Accountability Mechanism" is better associated >>> with mechanism per the Bylaws, namely Request for Reconsideration, >>> Independent Review Process and ICANN Ombudsman, within the SubPro context, >>> "Accountability Mechanism" is about appeals for the new gTLD Program -- >>> looking at rights and forms of appeals to decisions made during evaluation, >>> objections, either by ICANN Org/Board, external evaluators, external third >>> party Dispute Resolution Service Providers (DRSPs), as well as in respect >>> of post-delegation dispute resolution procedures. >>> >>> CCT Recommendation #35 is picked up under this topic, specifically >>> sub-recommendation (3) "*Introducing a post dispute resolution panel >>> review mechanism*". >>> >>> As I alluded to at the CPWG call of 26 Sep under the topic of >>> Objections, there were public comments which suggested that ALAC's ability >>> to file Objections in subsequent procedures be explicitly limited on >>> account of budgetary constraint. >>> >>> Along the same lines, a question was raised during the last SubPro WG >>> call as to whether AC's should be funded by ICANN to file appeals. This is >>> something which may require addressing either through a position relayed to >>> SubPro WG momentarily and/or in any statement in response to the call for >>> public comments to SubPro WG's final report in due course. >>> >>> On that note, I wish you a pleasant week ahead. >>> >>> Justine Chew >>> ----- >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CPWG mailing list >>> CPWG(a)icann.org >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your >>> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance >>> with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) >>> and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) >>> You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or >>> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or >>> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> GTLD-WG mailing list >>> GTLD-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg >>> >>> Working Group direct URL: >>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs >>> _______________________________________________ >>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your >>> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance >>> with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) >>> and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) >>> You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or >>> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or >>> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> CPWG mailing list >> CPWG(a)icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg >> >> _______________________________________________ >> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your >> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance >> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and >> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) You >> can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or >> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or >> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so >> on._______________________________________________ >> registration-issues-wg mailing list >> registration-issues-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg >> >> _______________________________________________ >> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your >> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance >> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and >> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) You >> can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or >> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or >> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. > >

3 3

Fwd: [ICANN Community Leaders] 10 October Update
by Maureen Hilyard Oct. 10, 2019

Oct. 10, 2019

Thursday, 10 October 2019 ICANN Community Leadership Digest The ICANN org Policy Development Support team publishes this twice-weekly digest to help ICANN community leaders track requests and updates. A Blog about Friendship Göran Marby, President and CEO We have a Swedish saying for when someone you love passes away: He is missed in me. As you now know, our dear friend Tarek has passed away and he is missed in me. There will be many eulogies written about this remarkable man who touched so many. I think many of us have wonderful memories that we can share about him, and I invite you to share them with us in this blog. I will make sure that his family receives your stories. When I think about Tarek, I think about a man with a great sense of humor. Whenever we talked, he often ended the conversation by calling me boss. He knew and I knew that when it came to his area of expertise, I was and will forever be his junior. When we were together in Barcelona for a meeting with the Minister of Communication of UAE, the subject matter was a little bit sensitive and it was important that I follow Tarek's instructions. At the end of the meeting, the minister looked at me and said, "You know that Tarek is much better known than ICANN in my region and I would not sit here if it was not for him." He paused, looked at Tarek and said something in Arabic. Afterward I learned that he complimented Tarek for teaching me so well. And he was right - Tarek had the unique ability to bring people together and forget our differences. I think the reason for that was his big heart, and it is the reason while he will always be missed in me. Please tell your stories about Tarek. <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001t_-YzCBKPXpbcisjZI6cglSzgaEGk7ghUKS-_z_owzg_…> Table of Contents ICANN66 Planning - REGISTRATION ENDS TOMORROW: ICANN66 Prep Week Schedule - DEADLINE TOMORROW: Participate in Newcomers Day at ICANN66 - DUE ON MONDAY: Preparations for ICANN66 Constituency Day - REMINDER: Finance Briefings at ICANN66 - REMINDER: Support the ICANN Engagement Booth at ICANN66 - SAVE THE DATE: ICANN66 Community Leadership Reception Information Sharing - REMINDER: Invitation to Provide Feedback on the ICANN Board’s Proposed Public Interest Framework - REMINDER: ICANN Preparations for IGF 2019: Information for the Community and Requests for Input - REMINDER: 2020 Leadership Program Public Comment - CLOSING ON MONDAY: Next Steps to Improve the Effectiveness of ICANN's Multistakeholder Model - Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review Team (CCT-RT) Accepted Recommendations – Plan for Implementation and Next Steps - NEW: Registration Directory Service (WHOIS2) Review Team Final Report - REMINDER: Public Comment Guidelines for ICANN org ICANN66 Planning REGISTRATION ENDS TOMORROW: ICANN66 Prep Week Executive: David Olive, Senior Vice President, Policy Development Support FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING On Monday, ICANN released the schedule for ICANN66 Prep Week, which features a series of seven webinars to prepare the community ahead of its Annual General Meeting in November. See the schedule and registration information <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001t_-YzCBKPXpbcisjZI6cglSzgaEGk7ghUKS-_z_owzg_…>. Register by Friday, 11 October 2019. DEADLINE TOMORROW: Participate in Newcomers Day at ICANN66 Executive: Sally Costerton, Senior Vice President, Global Stakeholder Engagement FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING The Public Responsibility Support team will be hosting Newcomers Day for ICANN66 on Sunday, 3 November 2019. Newcomers Day will feature two community sessions: Session 1: Supporting Organization Councils and Advisory Committees 10:00-12:20 (broken up into ten minute slots; e.g. 10:00-10:10, 10:10-10:20, etc.) Session 2: Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies 13:20-15:00 (broken up into ten minute slots; e.g. 13:20-13:30, 13:30-13:40, etc.) We would like to invite your community group to designate a representative to attend the relevant session. Your remarks should be focused toward the Newcomers and will be followed by a brief question and answer session. Together, this should not exceed 10 minutes. We will provide standard slides but you are welcome to send us any slides as well. We will share the deck once it is finalized. By Friday, 11 October 2019, please email deborah.escalera(a)icann.org with your designated representative(s). DUE ON MONDAY: Preparations for ICANN66 Constituency Day From: Cherine Chalaby, ICANN Board Chair FOR: All Community Leaders ACTION ITEM Dear Constituency and Stakeholder Group Chairs, Please reply no later than Monday, 14 October 2019 The Board and I are very much looking forward to engaging with you during our 21st AGM that will take place in Montréal between 2-7 November 2019. We wish to keep working on improving our interaction with you and, in particular, we want to address some of the requests and feedback we have received and introduce some more flexibility in the format of our valuable face-to-face meetings. Starting in Montréal, instead of sending up to three questions to the Board, we would like to offer you the alternative option of choosing a single topic and having an open discussion with the Board on that topic. We are also suggesting that the list of questions or topics received be shared with the entire Community using the Policy digest, in order to increase transparency and allow the groups to improve their own understanding of their peers’ point of views on different issues. As for time allocation, we propose to allocate half of our time together to answer your questions or discuss your single topic and the other half to address the Board’s topic. In preparation for our meetings, the Board chose the following topic to have an open discussion with you: “Community, Board and ICANN org readiness to implement the following three critical plans that will shape ICANN’s future: (1) Strategic Plan FY 21-25, (2) Operating & Financial Plan FY 21-25, and (3) Work Plan to improve the effectiveness of ICANN’s multistakeholder model.” The Strategic Plan <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001t_-YzCBKPXpbcisjZI6cglSzgaEGk7ghUKS-_z_owzg_…> has been adopted by the Board last June at ICANN65 in Marrakech. The two other plans will be completed and posted for public comment in December 2019. At ICANN64 in Kobe, the Board asked each constituency to provide three suggestions, one for the Board, one for ICANN org and one for the Community of things/aspects that should be done/improved in order to implement these plans successfully, starting 1 July 2020, as mandated by our Bylaws. In addition, the Board asked for one suggestion of something that could be done externally to improve trust and with our partners and alliances (eg. IETF) so that they collaborate effectively with ICANN on some of our strategic objectives (eg. DNS security). Based on the input received in Kobe, we are compiling a list of suggested actions for the community, Board and ICANN org which we would like to share and discuss with you in Montreal. We will send you that list in advance of our meeting in Montréal on or before Friday, 11 October 2019. We would be very grateful if you could send to Board Operations ( board-ops-team(a)icann.org) your single topic or the list of questions (max. 3), in order of priority, no later than Monday, 14 October 2019 or sooner. For information, we are not changing the current total time allotted per group nor the room set-up. We look forward to hearing your thoughts on our suggestions and on how to improve our interaction further. We thank you in advance for your time on this matter and we look forward to welcoming you in Canada! Best regards, Cherine Chalaby REMINDER: Finance Briefings at ICANN66 Executive: Xavier Calvez, Chief Financial Officer FOR: All Community Leaders ACTION ITEM The ICANN org Finance team would like to meet with the Supporting Organizations, Advisory Committees, Stakeholder Groups, Constituencies, and Regional At-Large Regional Organization groups at ICANN66 to present a short update on planning- and finance-related topics, including: - Five Year Operating Plan and Financial Plan - FY21 Operating Plan - FY19 Financials/FY20 Updates - Accountability and Transparency reporting – specific reports published by the ICANN org Finance team. Please let us know by Monday, 28 October 2019, if there are time slots that we can present. We appreciate your assistance. Becky Nash, becky.nash(a)icann.org Shani Quidwai, shani.quidwai(a)icann.org REMINDER: Support the ICANN Engagement Booth at ICANN66 Executive: Sally Costerton, Senior Vice President, Global Stakeholder Engagement FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING I know everyone is busy preparing for ICANN66, but I want to make you aware that you are welcome and encouraged to come and do outreach at the ICANN Engagement booth. The ICANN Engagement booth is in place so that Newcomers, ICANN org members, and ICANN community members to engage in discussions. It is supported by volunteers from the ICANN community, including members of Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees. It would be beneficial to have the presence of seasoned ICANN community members to share their knowledge. We would like to offer one-hour slots during ICANN66. Sign up here <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001t_-YzCBKPXpbcisjZI6cglSzgaEGk7ghUKS-_z_owzg_…> . Sincerely, Deborah Escalera SAVE THE DATE: ICANN66 Community Leadership Reception Executive: David Olive, Senior Vice President, Policy Development Support FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING The ICANN66 Community Leadership Reception with members of the ICANN Board and Executive Team will be held on Friday, 1 November 2019. More details including location and specific time will be shared later. Information Sharing REMINDER: Invitation to Provide Feedback on the ICANN Board’s Proposed Public Interest Framework Executive: Sally Costerton, Senior Vice President, Global Stakeholder Engagement FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING >From 18 September – 18 October 2019, a community consultation is taking place on the global public interest framework proposed by the ICANN Board. In reviewing the proposal, the ICANN Board is asking the ICANN community to consider the following questions for input to the ICANN Board: 1. What are your thoughts on the proposed framework approach? Do you have any suggestions for how it could be improved? 2. What are your thoughts on the proposed approach for decisions in the ICANN ecosystem to be accompanied by a consideration of their impact on the global public interest (as well as an explanation regarding what is meant by the GPI in the specific case)? 3. How do you see this working for the Supporting Organization (SO), Advisory Committee (AC), constituency, group, review team, or cross-community working group (CCWG) to which you are contributing? The global public interest is central to many of ICANN’s primary governance documents, and the ICANN Board hopes to play a role in facilitating a bottom-up, community-driven process to develop a framework as a toolkit for the ICANN community to consider the global public interest. These considerations would not change the process by which decisions are made but could instead serve as tools for the community to reinforce the commitment to the public interest and to demonstrate how specific recommendations, advice, and public comments are in the global public interest. This includes the ICANN community guiding the ICANN Board about the public interest determination the latter must make in its decisions. To learn more about the framework, please read the discussion paper <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001t_-YzCBKPXpbcisjZI6cglSzgaEGk7ghUKS-_z_owzg_…>. Community feedback is welcome by Friday, 18 October 2019 via email at gpitoolkit(a)icann.org. After the community consultation, there will be a public session at ICANN66, followed by a Public Comment proceeding. For more information, visit: https://go.icann.org/2kMb7RB. REMINDER: ICANN Preparations for IGF 2019: Information for the Community and Requests for Input FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING The 14th Annual Meeting of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) will be hosted by the Government of Germany in Berlin from 25 to 29 November 2019. ICANN org will have a booth, hold sessions, and co-host a reception with other Internet technical organizations. A few things we would like to share with you: - ICANN booth – The booth will be a resource for the ICANN community. Please contact us (see below) if you or any of your members would like to volunteer at the booth, or use the booth as a place for small meet-ups, etc. Once we have a better idea, we will create a schedule reflecting this. - Technical community reception – Monday, 25 November 2019, 18:30-20:00 (IGF venue). Space will be limited, and the reception will be by invitation only. Please send us (see below) the names of any community members attending the IGF and they will receive an invitation. Deadline: Tuesday, 12 November 2019. - Community sessions – Please send us (see below) details of any session at the IGF your community group and members are planning, and we will share this information online and at the ICANN booth. ICANN sessions IGF Day 0 Pre-Events: Monday, 25 November 2019 - 15:05-14:35 | Workshop: The evolving ecosystem: ICANN's role in the security and stability of the Internet <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001t_-YzCBKPXpbcisjZI6cglSzgaEGk7ghUKS-_z_owzg_…> IGF Day 1: Tuesday, 26 November 2019 - 10:45-11:45 | ICANN Open Forum: ICANN - DNS, Threats and Opportunities <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001t_-YzCBKPXpbcisjZI6cglSzgaEGk7ghUKS-_z_owzg_…> IGF Day 3: Thursday 28 November 2019 - 11:05-12:35 | Workshop: Online Identity in the Multilingual Domain Name Space <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001t_-YzCBKPXpbcisjZI6cglSzgaEGk7ghUKS-_z_owzg_…> ICANN org contact for community members and requests: Adam Peake, adam.peake(a)icann.org. REMINDER: 2020 Leadership Program From: Sally Costerton, Senior Vice President, Global Stakeholder Engagement FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING >From Wednesday, 2 October to Friday, 15 November 2019, ICANN has issued a call for nominations for the 2020 Leadership Program, scheduled for 5–6 March in Cancún, Mexico, just prior to ICANN67. The Leadership Program helps current and incoming leaders better understand the complexities of ICANN, while also helping to develop the facilitation skills of participants. Understanding ICANN as an organization, the topics discussed within ICANN, and the interaction within other stakeholder groups can be challenging for incoming leaders, but sometimes also for experienced leaders. ICANN org and the community are making considerable efforts to help incoming leaders have a good start to their terms and to provide current leaders the opportunity to strengthen their leadership and facilitation skills. Opportunities for Leadership Program participants include the following: - Meet leaders from the other Supporting Organizations/Advisory Committees and get an insight of the functionality and issues in other groups - Discuss current ICANN topics in an in-depth manner - Deepen the understanding of key ICANN processes - Develop facilitation and leadership skills, focused personal effectiveness to run meetings and foster processes Interested individuals need to be endorsed by their Supporting Organization, Advisory Committee, or stakeholder group. Please register here <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001t_-YzCBKPXpbcisjZI6cglSzgaEGk7ghUKS-_z_owzg_…> by Friday, 15 November 2019, 23:59 UTC. The Leadership Program does not provide financial support for travel to Cancún but does cover accommodations and offer a stipend for the days a participant is involved in the program. Public Comment CLOSING ON MONDAY: Next Steps to Improve the Effectiveness of ICANN's Multistakeholder Model <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001t_-YzCBKPXpbcisjZI6cglSzgaEGk7ghUKS-_z_owzg_…> Close Date: Monday, 14 October 2019 Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review Team (CCT-RT) Accepted Recommendations – Plan for Implementation and Next Steps <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001t_-YzCBKPXpbcisjZI6cglSzgaEGk7ghUKS-_z_owzg_…> Close Date: Monday, 21 October 2019 NEW: Registration Directory Service (WHOIS2) Review Team Final Report <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001t_-YzCBKPXpbcisjZI6cglSzgaEGk7ghUKS-_z_owzg_…> Close Date: Monday, 25 November 2019 REMINDER: Public Comment Guidelines for ICANN org Executive: David Olive, Senior Vice President, Policy Development Support FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING ICANN org recently adopted internal guidelines for Public Comment. The internal guidelines clarify the purpose of Public Comment and define when Public Comment is necessary. Read more. <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001t_-YzCBKPXpbcisjZI6cglSzgaEGk7ghUKS-_z_owzg_…> <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001t_-YzCBKPXpbcisjZI6cglSzgaEGk7ghUKS-_z_owzg_…> Volume 1, Issue 57 | Archive <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001t_-YzCBKPXpbcisjZI6cglSzgaEGk7ghUKS-_z_owzg_…> | Next Issue: Monday, 14 October 2019 ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Unsubscribe so-ac-sg-cleaders(a)icann.org <https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=un&m=00115LrDzKl3LoTB9FWCDiE2A%3D&…> Update Profile <https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=oo&m=00115LrDzKl3LoTB9FWCDiE2A%3D&…> | <a class="footer-about-

1 0

Fwd: [ICANN Community Leaders] 7 October Update
by Maureen Hilyard Oct. 7, 2019

Oct. 7, 2019

Monday, 7 October 2019 ICANN Community Leadership Digest The ICANN org Policy Development Support team publishes this twice-weekly digest to help ICANN community leaders track requests and updates. TABLE OF CONTENTS ICANN66 Planning - NEW: Finance Briefings at ICANN66 - REGISTER BY FRIDAY: ICANN66 Prep Week Schedule - DEADLINE THIS WEEK: Participate in Newcomers Day at ICANN66 - DEADLINE IN ONE WEEK: Preparations for ICANN66 Constituency Day - REMINDER: Support the ICANN Engagement Booth at ICANN66 - SAVE THE DATE: ICANN66 Community Leadership Reception Information Sharing - NEW: CSC Findings on PTI Performance for August 2019 - NEW: 2020 Leadership Program - REMINDER: Invitation to Provide Feedback on the ICANN Board’s Proposed Public Interest Framework - REMINDER: ICANN Preparations for IGF 2019: Information for the Community and Requests for Input Public Comment - NEW: Public Comment Guidelines for ICANN org - CLOSING IN ONE WEEK: Next Steps to Improve the Effectiveness of ICANN's Multistakeholder Model - Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review Team (CCT-RT) Accepted Recommendations – Plan for Implementation and Next Steps ICANN66 Planning NEW: Finance Briefings at ICANN66 Executive: Xavier Calvez, Chief Financial Officer FOR: All Community Leaders ACTION ITEM The ICANN org Finance team would like to meet with the Supporting Organizations, Advisory Committees, Stakeholder Groups, Constituencies, and Regional At-Large Regional Organization groups at ICANN66 to present a short update on planning- and finance-related topics, including: - Five Year Operating Plan and Financial Plan - FY21 Operating Plan - FY19 Financials/FY20 Updates - Accountability and Transparency reporting – specific reports published by the ICANN org Finance team. Please let us know by Monday, 28 October 2019, if there are time slots that we can present. We appreciate your assistance. Becky Nash, becky.nash(a)icann.org Shani Quidwai, shani.quidwai(a)icann.org REGISTER BY FRIDAY: ICANN66 Prep Week Executive: David Olive, Senior Vice President, Policy Development Support FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING On Monday, ICANN released the schedule for ICANN66 Prep Week, which features a series of seven webinars to prepare the community ahead of its Annual General Meeting in November. See the schedule and registration information <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001e2bzC2yluvJVWhOiME8XRd8pKQDtEr7wg4FLUcdO0LoJ…>. Register by Friday, 11 October 2019. DEADLINE THIS WEEK: Participate in Newcomers Day at ICANN66 Executive: Sally Costerton, Senior Vice President, Global Stakeholder Engagement FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING The Public Responsibility Support team will be hosting Newcomers Day for ICANN66 on Sunday, 3 November 2019. Newcomers Day will feature two community sessions: Session 1: Supporting Organization Councils and Advisory Committees 10:00-12:20 (broken up into ten minute slots; e.g. 10:00-10:10, 10:10-10:20, etc.) Session 2: Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies 13:20-15:00 (broken up into ten minute slots; e.g. 13:20-13:30, 13:30-13:40, etc.) We would like to invite your community group to designate a representative to attend the relevant session. Your remarks should be focused toward the Newcomers and will be followed by a brief question and answer session. Together, this should not exceed 10 minutes. We will provide standard slides but you are welcome to send us any slides as well. We will share the deck once it is finalized. By Friday, 11 October 2019, please email deborah.escalera(a)icann.org with your designated representative(s). DEADLINE IN ONE WEEK: Preparations for ICANN66 Constituency Day From: Cherine Chalaby, ICANN Board Chair FOR: All Community Leaders ACTION ITEM Dear Constituency and Stakeholder Group Chairs, Please reply no later than Monday, 14 October 2019 The Board and I are very much looking forward to engaging with you during our 21st AGM that will take place in Montréal between 2-7 November 2019. We wish to keep working on improving our interaction with you and, in particular, we want to address some of the requests and feedback we have received and introduce some more flexibility in the format of our valuable face-to-face meetings. Starting in Montréal, instead of sending up to three questions to the Board, we would like to offer you the alternative option of choosing a single topic and having an open discussion with the Board on that topic. We are also suggesting that the list of questions or topics received be shared with the entire Community using the Policy digest, in order to increase transparency and allow the groups to improve their own understanding of their peers’ point of views on different issues. As for time allocation, we propose to allocate half of our time together to answer your questions or discuss your single topic and the other half to address the Board’s topic. In preparation for our meetings, the Board chose the following topic to have an open discussion with you: “Community, Board and ICANN org readiness to implement the following three critical plans that will shape ICANN’s future: (1) Strategic Plan FY 21-25, (2) Operating & Financial Plan FY 21-25, and (3) Work Plan to improve the effectiveness of ICANN’s multistakeholder model.” The Strategic Plan <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001e2bzC2yluvJVWhOiME8XRd8pKQDtEr7wg4FLUcdO0LoJ…> has been adopted by the Board last June at ICANN65 in Marrakech. The two other plans will be completed and posted for public comment in December 2019. At ICANN64 in Kobe, the Board asked each constituency to provide three suggestions, one for the Board, one for ICANN org and one for the Community of things/aspects that should be done/improved in order to implement these plans successfully, starting 1 July 2020, as mandated by our Bylaws. In addition, the Board asked for one suggestion of something that could be done externally to improve trust and with our partners and alliances (eg. IETF) so that they collaborate effectively with ICANN on some of our strategic objectives (eg. DNS security). Based on the input received in Kobe, we are compiling a list of suggested actions for the community, Board and ICANN org which we would like to share and discuss with you in Montreal. We will send you that list in advance of our meeting in Montréal on or before Friday, 11 October 2019. We would be very grateful if you could send to Board Operations ( board-ops-team(a)icann.org) your single topic or the list of questions (max. 3), in order of priority, no later than Monday, 14 October 2019 or sooner. For information, we are not changing the current total time allotted per group nor the room set-up. We look forward to hearing your thoughts on our suggestions and on how to improve our interaction further. We thank you in advance for your time on this matter and we look forward to welcoming you in Canada! Best regards, Cherine Chalaby REMINDER: Support the ICANN Engagement Booth at ICANN66 Executive: Sally Costerton, Senior Vice President, Global Stakeholder Engagement FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING I know everyone is busy preparing for ICANN66, but I want to make you aware that you are welcome and encouraged to come and do outreach at the ICANN Engagement booth. The ICANN Engagement booth is in place so that Newcomers, ICANN org members, and ICANN community members to engage in discussions. It is supported by volunteers from the ICANN community, including members of Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees. It would be beneficial to have the presence of seasoned ICANN community members to share their knowledge. We would like to offer one-hour slots during ICANN66. Sign up here <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001e2bzC2yluvJVWhOiME8XRd8pKQDtEr7wg4FLUcdO0LoJ…> . Sincerely, Deborah Escalera SAVE THE DATE: ICANN66 Community Leadership Reception Executive: David Olive, Senior Vice President, Policy Development Support FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING The ICANN66 Community Leadership Reception with members of the ICANN Board and Executive Team will be held on Friday, 1 November 2019. More details including location and specific time will be shared later. Information Sharing NEW: CSC Findings on PTI Performance for August 2019 From: Lars-Johan Liman, CSC Interim Chair FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING As interim chair of the Customer Standing Committee, I am providing you with our monthly findings on the performance of Public Technical Identifiers (PTI) over August 2019. I am pleased to inform you that the CSC has concluded that PTI’s overall performance over August 2019 was “Satisfactory” - PTI met the service level agreement at 98.4% for the month of August 2019. The missed service level agreement was satisfactorily explained and not an indication of a performance issue. The related PTI report to the CSC, listing the individual service level metrics along with their actual and historical performance, can be found here <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001e2bzC2yluvJVWhOiME8XRd8pKQDtEr7wg4FLUcdO0LoJ…> . I am also very pleased to inform you that: 1. In accordance with the Service Level Agreement (SLA) change procedure, the CSC will request the Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) and Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Councils to approve to the introduction of this SLA. 2. The second SLA listed in the CSC Findings report, "ccTLD Creation/Transfer – Validation and Reviews: SLA Amendments," was approved by the CSC, and PTI will shortly open a Public Comment proceeding to seek your input and comments. Both SLA changes are explained in more detail in the CSC Findings Report for August 2019. At its latest meeting, the CSC also decided to amend its internal procedures to deal with the special circumstance that one or more of the seats on the CSC for a member appointed by the direct customers (ccNSO and Registries Stakeholder Group) is vacant. If such an extraordinary circumstance occurs, the CSC will continue its basic business of monitoring the PTI performance and limit its decision making to approval of the CSC Findings Report until there is no more vacancy. As our previous chair, Byron Holland, has stepped down from the CSC per 1 October 2019, I would like to thank him for his outstanding leadership during the creation of the CSC and through its first years. I would also like to thank Elaine Pruis for her valuable time on the CSC, as she too now steps down. In the current situation, with two vacant member seats, I have humbly accepted the trust from the CSC to act as interim chair for the group up and until the full membership of the CSC (members and liaisons) have been approved by the ccNSO and GNSO Councils and the new membership has appointed a new chair and vice chair. BACKGROUND Generally, the CSC regular meeting is scheduled on or around the 15th every month, and the CSC findings report on the PTI performance is sent out shortly after that meeting. If you would like to be informed of upcoming meetings or receive CSC reports directly, you may want to subscribe to our announce list <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001e2bzC2yluvJVWhOiME8XRd8pKQDtEr7wg4FLUcdO0LoJ…>. Any comments on our reporting to you is welcome. The CSC became effective 1 October 2016. Background information on the committee along with transcripts of our meetings and other useful information can be found here <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001e2bzC2yluvJVWhOiME8XRd8pKQDtEr7wg4FLUcdO0LoJ…> . NEW: 2020 Leadership Program From: Sally Costerton, Senior Vice President, Global Stakeholder Engagement FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING >From Wednesday, 2 October to Friday, 15 November 2019, ICANN has issued a call for nominations for the 2020 Leadership Program, scheduled for 5–6 March in Cancún, Mexico, just prior to ICANN67. The Leadership Program helps current and incoming leaders better understand the complexities of ICANN, while also helping to develop the facilitation skills of participants. Understanding ICANN as an organization, the topics discussed within ICANN, and the interaction within other stakeholder groups can be challenging for incoming leaders, but sometimes also for experienced leaders. ICANN org and the community are making considerable efforts to help incoming leaders have a good start to their terms and to provide current leaders the opportunity to strengthen their leadership and facilitation skills. Opportunities for Leadership Program participants include the following: - Meet leaders from the other Supporting Organizations/Advisory Committees and get an insight of the functionality and issues in other groups - Discuss current ICANN topics in an in-depth manner - Deepen the understanding of key ICANN processes - Develop facilitation and leadership skills, focused personal effectiveness to run meetings and foster processes Interested individuals need to be endorsed by their Supporting Organization, Advisory Committee, or stakeholder group. Please register here <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001e2bzC2yluvJVWhOiME8XRd8pKQDtEr7wg4FLUcdO0LoJ…> by Friday, 15 November 2019, 23:59 UTC. The Leadership Program does not provide financial support for travel to Cancún but does cover accommodations and offer a stipend for the days a participant is involved in the program. REMINDER: Invitation to Provide Feedback on the ICANN Board’s Proposed Public Interest Framework Executive: Sally Costerton, Senior Vice President, Global Stakeholder Engagement FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING >From 18 September – 18 October 2019, a community consultation is taking place on the global public interest framework proposed by the ICANN Board. In reviewing the proposal, the ICANN Board is asking the ICANN community to consider the following questions for input to the ICANN Board: 1. What are your thoughts on the proposed framework approach? Do you have any suggestions for how it could be improved? 2. What are your thoughts on the proposed approach for decisions in the ICANN ecosystem to be accompanied by a consideration of their impact on the global public interest (as well as an explanation regarding what is meant by the GPI in the specific case)? 3. How do you see this working for the Supporting Organization (SO), Advisory Committee (AC), constituency, group, review team, or cross-community working group (CCWG) to which you are contributing? The global public interest is central to many of ICANN’s primary governance documents, and the ICANN Board hopes to play a role in facilitating a bottom-up, community-driven process to develop a framework as a toolkit for the ICANN community to consider the global public interest. These considerations would not change the process by which decisions are made but could instead serve as tools for the community to reinforce the commitment to the public interest and to demonstrate how specific recommendations, advice, and public comments are in the global public interest. This includes the ICANN community guiding the ICANN Board about the public interest determination the latter must make in its decisions. To learn more about the framework, please read the discussion paper <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001e2bzC2yluvJVWhOiME8XRd8pKQDtEr7wg4FLUcdO0LoJ…>. Community feedback is welcome by Friday, 18 October 2019 via email at gpitoolkit(a)icann.org. After the community consultation, there will be a public session at ICANN66, followed by a Public Comment proceeding. For more information, visit: https://go.icann.org/2kMb7RB. REMINDER: ICANN Preparations for IGF 2019: Information for the Community and Requests for Input Executive: Tarek Kamel, Senior Vice President, Government and International Governmental Organization Engagement FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING The 14th Annual Meeting of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) will be hosted by the Government of Germany in Berlin from 25 to 29 November 2019. ICANN org will have a booth, hold sessions, and co-host a reception with other Internet technical organizations. A few things we would like to share with you: - ICANN booth – The booth will be a resource for the ICANN community. Please contact us (see below) if you or any of your members would like to volunteer at the booth, or use the booth as a place for small meet-ups, etc. Once we have a better idea, we will create a schedule reflecting this. - Technical community reception – Monday, 25 November 2019, 18:30-20:00 (IGF venue). Space will be limited, and the reception will be by invitation only. Please send us (see below) the names of any community members attending the IGF and they will receive an invitation. Deadline: Tuesday, 12 November 2019. - Community sessions – Please send us (see below) details of any session at the IGF your community group and members are planning, and we will share this information online and at the ICANN booth. ICANN sessions IGF Day 0 Pre-Events: Monday, 25 November 2019 - 15:05-14:35 | Workshop: The evolving ecosystem: ICANN's role in the security and stability of the Internet <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001e2bzC2yluvJVWhOiME8XRd8pKQDtEr7wg4FLUcdO0LoJ…> IGF Day 1: Tuesday, 26 November 2019 - 10:45-11:45 | ICANN Open Forum: ICANN - DNS, Threats and Opportunities <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001e2bzC2yluvJVWhOiME8XRd8pKQDtEr7wg4FLUcdO0LoJ…> IGF Day 3: Thursday 28 November 2019 - 11:05-12:35 | Workshop: Online Identity in the Multilingual Domain Name Space <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001e2bzC2yluvJVWhOiME8XRd8pKQDtEr7wg4FLUcdO0LoJ…> ICANN org contact for community members and requests: Adam Peake, adam.peake(a)icann.org. Public Comment NEW: Public Comment Guidelines for ICANN org Executive: David Olive, Senior Vice President, Policy Development Support FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING Public Comment is a mechanism that gives the ICANN community and other stakeholders an opportunity to provide input and feedback on ICANN’s work. It ensures ICANN and its community “operate to the maximum extent feasible in an open and transparent manner and consistent with procedures designed to ensure fairness” per the ICANN Bylaws. ICANN org recently adopted internal guidelines for Public Comment. The internal guidelines clarify the purpose of Public Comment and define when Public Comment is necessary. In particular, I would like to highlight three points from the internal guidelines: 1. Public Comment is the default mechanism when seeking feedback from the ICANN community or general public. 2. There could be circumstances where an alternative to Public Comment may be more appropriate. Alternative mechanisms include consultations or surveys for more targeted audiences. ICANN org executive team members will need to approve these alternatives to Public Comment. 3. Announcements, blog posts, social media campaigns, regional newsletters, and mailing lists will not be used as mechanisms for collecting feedback. ICANN org supports the work of the community by managing Public Comment as a consistent feedback mechanism. We hope the internal guidelines contribute to the accountability and transparency commitments of ICANN org. This is also a good opportunity to remind you about the Upcoming Public Comment Proceedings webpage <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001e2bzC2yluvJVWhOiME8XRd8pKQDtEr7wg4FLUcdO0LoJ…>. The Public Comment team updates this webpage on a monthly basis. Moreover, the Public Comment team publishes an annual report of Public Comment trends. I encourage you to read the findings from the last nine years <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001e2bzC2yluvJVWhOiME8XRd8pKQDtEr7wg4FLUcdO0LoJ…> . As ICANN evolves, the Public Comment process will adapt as well. The Public Comment team has been working with the Information Transparency Initiative team to develop an improved Public Comment feature based on input from the ICANN community. We look forward to testing it in early 2020 <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001e2bzC2yluvJVWhOiME8XRd8pKQDtEr7wg4FLUcdO0LoJ…> . As always, the Public Comment team is available to answer questions at public-comment(a)icann.org<span style="font-size: 12px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-ser

1 0

Fwd: [ICANN Community Leaders] 3 October Update
by Maureen Hilyard Oct. 3, 2019

Oct. 3, 2019

Thursday, 3 October 2019 ICANN Community Leadership Digest The ICANN org Policy Development Support team publishes this twice-weekly digest to help ICANN community leaders track requests and updates. TABLE OF CONTENTS ICANN66 Planning - REMINDER: Preparations for ICANN66 Constituency Day - REMINDER: ICANN66 Prep Week Schedule - REMINDER: Participate in Newcomers Day at ICANN66 - REMINDER: Support the ICANN Engagement Booth at ICANN66 - SAVE THE DATE: ICANN66 Community Leadership Reception Information Sharing - REMINDER: Invitation to Provide Feedback on the ICANN Board’s Proposed Public Interest Framework - REMINDER: ICANN Preparations for IGF 2019: Information for the Community and Requests for Input Public Comment - Next Steps to Improve the Effectiveness of ICANN's Multistakeholder Model - Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review Team (CCT-RT) Accepted Recommendations – Plan for Implementation and Next Steps ICANN66 Planning REMINDER: Preparations for ICANN66 Constituency Day From: Cherine Chalaby, ICANN Board Chair FOR: All Community Leaders ACTION ITEM Dear Constituency and Stakeholder Group Chairs, Please reply no later than Monday, 14 October 2019 The Board and I are very much looking forward to engaging with you during our 21st AGM that will take place in Montréal between 2-7 November 2019. We wish to keep working on improving our interaction with you and, in particular, we want to address some of the requests and feedback we have received and introduce some more flexibility in the format of our valuable face-to-face meetings. Starting in Montréal, instead of sending up to three questions to the Board, we would like to offer you the alternative option of choosing a single topic and having an open discussion with the Board on that topic. We are also suggesting that the list of questions or topics received be shared with the entire Community using the Policy digest, in order to increase transparency and allow the groups to improve their own understanding of their peers’ point of views on different issues. As for time allocation, we propose to allocate half of our time together to answer your questions or discuss your single topic and the other half to address the Board’s topic. In preparation for our meetings, the Board chose the following topic to have an open discussion with you: “Community, Board and ICANN org readiness to implement the following three critical plans that will shape ICANN’s future: (1) Strategic Plan FY 21-25, (2) Operating & Financial Plan FY 21-25, and (3) Work Plan to improve the effectiveness of ICANN’s multistakeholder model.” The Strategic Plan <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0016O7Wp4lNo5S6b7spqVhf4WBL8Bt30jO3d6ln9RYQGnRU…> has been adopted by the Board last June at ICANN65 in Marrakech. The two other plans will be completed and posted for public comment in December 2019. At ICANN64 in Kobe, the Board asked each constituency to provide three suggestions, one for the Board, one for ICANN org and one for the Community of things/aspects that should be done/improved in order to implement these plans successfully, starting 1 July 2020, as mandated by our Bylaws. In addition, the Board asked for one suggestion of something that could be done externally to improve trust and with our partners and alliances (eg. IETF) so that they collaborate effectively with ICANN on some of our strategic objectives (eg. DNS security). Based on the input received in Kobe, we are compiling a list of suggested actions for the community, Board and ICANN org which we would like to share and discuss with you in Montreal. We will send you that list in advance of our meeting in Montréal on or before Friday, 11 October 2019. We would be very grateful if you could send to Board Operations ( board-ops-team(a)icann.org) your single topic or the list of questions (max. 3), in order of priority, no later than Monday, 14 October 2019 or sooner. For information, we are not changing the current total time allotted per group nor the room set-up. We look forward to hearing your thoughts on our suggestions and on how to improve our interaction further. We thank you in advance for your time on this matter and we look forward to welcoming you in Canada! Best regards, Cherine Chalaby REMINDER: ICANN66 Prep Week Schedule Executive: David Olive, Senior Vice President, Policy Development Support FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING On Monday, ICANN released the schedule for ICANN66 Prep Week, which features a series of seven webinars to prepare the community ahead of its Annual General Meeting in November. See the schedule and registration information <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0016O7Wp4lNo5S6b7spqVhf4WBL8Bt30jO3d6ln9RYQGnRU…>. REMINDER: Participate in Newcomers Day at ICANN66 Executive: Sally Costerton, Senior Vice President, Global Stakeholder Engagement FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING The Public Responsibility Support team will be hosting Newcomers Day for ICANN66 on Sunday, 3 November 2019. Newcomers Day will feature two community sessions: Session 1: Supporting Organization Councils and Advisory Committees 10:00-12:20 (broken up into ten minute slots; e.g. 10:00-10:10, 10:10-10:20, etc.) Session 2: Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies 13:20-15:00 (broken up into ten minute slots; e.g. 13:20-13:30, 13:30-13:40, etc.) We would like to invite your community group to designate a representative to attend the relevant session. Your remarks should be focused toward the Newcomers and will be followed by a brief question and answer session. Together, this should not exceed 10 minutes. We will provide standard slides but you are welcome to send us any slides as well. We will share the deck once it is finalized. By Friday, 11 October 2019, please email deborah.escalera(a)icann.org with your designated representative(s). REMINDER: Support the ICANN Engagement Booth at ICANN66 Executive: Sally Costerton, Senior Vice President, Global Stakeholder Engagement FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING I know everyone is busy preparing for ICANN66, but I want to make you aware that you are welcome and encouraged to come and do outreach at the ICANN Engagement booth. The ICANN Engagement booth is in place so that Newcomers, ICANN org members, and ICANN community members to engage in discussions. It is supported by volunteers from the ICANN community, including members of Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees. It would be beneficial to have the presence of seasoned ICANN community members to share their knowledge. We would like to offer one-hour slots during ICANN66. Sign up here <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0016O7Wp4lNo5S6b7spqVhf4WBL8Bt30jO3d6ln9RYQGnRU…> . Sincerely, Deborah Escalera SAVE THE DATE: ICANN66 Community Leadership Reception Executive: David Olive, Senior Vice President, Policy Development Support FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING The ICANN66 Community Leadership Reception with members of the ICANN Board and Executive Team will be held on Friday, 1 November 2019. More details including location and specific time will be shared later. Information Sharing REMINDER: Invitation to Provide Feedback on the ICANN Board’s Proposed Public Interest Framework Executive: Sally Costerton, Senior Vice President, Global Stakeholder Engagement FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING >From 18 September – 18 October 2019, a community consultation is taking place on the global public interest framework proposed by the ICANN Board. In reviewing the proposal, the ICANN Board is asking the ICANN community to consider the following questions for input to the ICANN Board: 1. What are your thoughts on the proposed framework approach? Do you have any suggestions for how it could be improved? 2. What are your thoughts on the proposed approach for decisions in the ICANN ecosystem to be accompanied by a consideration of their impact on the global public interest (as well as an explanation regarding what is meant by the GPI in the specific case)? 3. How do you see this working for the Supporting Organization (SO), Advisory Committee (AC), constituency, group, review team, or cross-community working group (CCWG) to which you are contributing? The global public interest is central to many of ICANN’s primary governance documents, and the ICANN Board hopes to play a role in facilitating a bottom-up, community-driven process to develop a framework as a toolkit for the ICANN community to consider the global public interest. These considerations would not change the process by which decisions are made but could instead serve as tools for the community to reinforce the commitment to the public interest and to demonstrate how specific recommendations, advice, and public comments are in the global public interest. This includes the ICANN community guiding the ICANN Board about the public interest determination the latter must make in its decisions. To learn more about the framework, please read the discussion paper <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0016O7Wp4lNo5S6b7spqVhf4WBL8Bt30jO3d6ln9RYQGnRU…>. Community feedback is welcome by Friday, 18 October 2019 via email at gpitoolkit(a)icann.org. After the community consultation, there will be a public session at ICANN66, followed by a Public Comment proceeding. For more information, visit: https://go.icann.org/2kMb7RB. REMINDER: ICANN Preparations for IGF 2019: Information for the Community and Requests for Input Executive: Tarek Kamel, Senior Vice President, Government and International Governmental Organization Engagement FOR: All Community Leaders INFORMATION SHARING The 14th Annual Meeting of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) will be hosted by the Government of Germany in Berlin from 25 to 29 November 2019. ICANN org will have a booth, hold sessions, and co-host a reception with other Internet technical organizations. A few things we would like to share with you: - The 2019 IGF aims to be paperless – Informal pamphlets and materials will be linked by a QR code to a dedicated ICANN page on the IGF website. If you are interested in distributing any materials your community group would like to share with IGF participants, please send the materials to us (see below). Deadline: Friday, 4 October 2019. - ICANN booth – The booth will be a resource for the ICANN community. Please contact us (see below) if you or any of your members would like to volunteer at the booth, or use the booth as a place for small meet-ups, etc. Once we have a better idea, we will create a schedule reflecting this. - Technical community reception – Monday, 25 November 2019, 18:30-20:00 (IGF venue). Space will be limited, and the reception will be by invitation only. Please send us (see below) the names of any community members attending the IGF and they will receive an invitation. Deadline: Tuesday, 12 November 2019. - Community sessions – Please send us (see below) details of any session at the IGF your community group and members are planning, and we will share this information online and at the ICANN booth. ICANN sessions IGF Day 0 Pre-Events: Monday, 25 November 2019 - 15:05-14:35 | Workshop: The evolving ecosystem: ICANN's role in the security and stability of the Internet <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0016O7Wp4lNo5S6b7spqVhf4WBL8Bt30jO3d6ln9RYQGnRU…> IGF Day 1: Tuesday, 26 November 2019 - 10:45-11:45 | ICANN Open Forum: ICANN - DNS, Threats and Opportunities <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0016O7Wp4lNo5S6b7spqVhf4WBL8Bt30jO3d6ln9RYQGnRU…> IGF Day 3: Thursday 28 November 2019 - 11:05-12:35 | Workshop: Online Identity in the Multilingual Domain Name Space <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0016O7Wp4lNo5S6b7spqVhf4WBL8Bt30jO3d6ln9RYQGnRU…> ICANN org contact for community members and requests: Adam Peake, adam.peake(a)icann.org. Public Comment Next Steps to Improve the Effectiveness of ICANN's Multistakeholder Model <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0016O7Wp4lNo5S6b7spqVhf4WBL8Bt30jO3d6ln9RYQGnRU…> Close Date: Monday, 14 October 2019 Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review Team (CCT-RT) Accepted Recommendations – Plan for Implementation and Next Steps <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0016O7Wp4lNo5S6b7spqVhf4WBL8Bt30jO3d6ln9RYQGnRU…> Close Date: Monday, 21 October 2019 Volume 1, Issue 55 | Archive <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0016O7Wp4lNo5S6b7spqVhf4WBL8Bt30jO3d6ln9RYQGnRU…> | Next Issue: Monday, 7 October 2019 ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Unsubscribe so-ac-sg-cleaders(a)icann.org <https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=un&m=00115LrDzKl3LoTB9FWCDiE2A%3D&…> Update Profile <https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=oo&m=00115LrDzKl3LoTB9FWCDiE2A%3D&…> | About Constant Contact <http://www.constantcontact.com/legal/about-constant-contact> Sent by david.olive(a)icann.org in collaboration with [image: Trusted Email from Constant Contact - Try it FREE today.] <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=nge&rmc=VF19_3GE> Try email marketing for free today! <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=nge&rmc=VF19_3GE> _______________________________________________ SO-AC-SG-CLeaders mailing list SO-AC-SG-CLeaders(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

1 0