- ALAC - lists.icann.org

Re: [ALAC] Fwd: ALAC and accessibility for people with disability
by Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro Oct. 18, 2012

Oct. 18, 2012

+1 On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Gunela Astbrink <g.astbrink(a)gsa.com.au>wrote: > Yes, I understand that. And I hope that many other countries support > Hungary's proposal. > > Resolution 70 is useful background information on the activities of the > ITU-T in terms of accessibility. > > > On 19/10/12 8:50 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote: > >> >> Thanks Gunela, the Hungary proposal that I had mentioned was their >> proposal in terms of the review of the ITRs in WCIT 12. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Gunela Astbrink <g.astbrink(a)gsa.com.au >> <mailto:g.astbrink@gsa.com.au>**> wrote: >> >> Useful update from Sala. >> >> The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has >> been signed by 154 countries with 125 ratifications and as you say, >> Sala, the US has not ratified yet. >> >> With regard to WCIT, you might be interested in the ITU-T Resolution >> 70 on telecommunications/ICT accessibility for people with >> disabilities >> http://www.itu.int/pub/T-RES-_**_T.70-2008<http://www.itu.int/pub/T-RES-__T.70-2008> >> >> <http://www.itu.int/pub/T-RES-**T.70-2008<http://www.itu.int/pub/T-RES-T.70-2008> >> > >> >> This states that consideration of accessibility should be taken in >> standards development. I'd like to see this integrated approach in >> ICANN processes too. It's more than web accessibility. >> >> Gunela >> >> >> On 19/10/12 4:48 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote: >> >> Streaming into the Caribbean WCIT Consultations and learning alot: >> >> Also interesting to note the following: >> >> * There is a United Nations Convention on Rights of Persons >> with >> >> Disabilities on this area, see: >> http://www.un.org/__**disabilities/default.asp?id=__**150<http://www.un.org/__disabilities/default.asp?id=__150> >> >> <http://www.un.org/**disabilities/default.asp?id=**150<http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=150>> >> (Whilst the US >> signed, it did not ratify the same. Although other >> countries have) >> * There is a submission by Hungary in the review of the ITRs >> to add a >> >> component to enable access for disabled persons and they are >> proposing 8(b) which countries should get behind as it is >> central to >> the issue of Access; >> * Whilst there have been other resolutions from the >> plenipotentiaries, >> >> where it was resolved that a Fund be created, only Cyprus >> has been >> giving money into the that Fund >> >> >> Much awareness still has to be done apparently for access. >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Gunela Astbrink >> <g.astbrink(a)gsa.com.au <mailto:g.astbrink@gsa.com.au> >> <mailto:g.astbrink@gsa.com.au <mailto:g.astbrink@gsa.com.au>** >> >__> >> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Sala, >> >> Thank you so much for your kind words. It's good to hear >> that the >> session I organised at PacINET on accessibility made an >> impact. >> >> Faaolo Utumapu from Samoa demonstrated how her screen reading >> software with speech synthesis works and how she can navigate >> through accessible websites. She also demonstrated how >> barriers are >> placed in front of her when websites are not accessible. For >> example, if she were to use the myICANN website, she would >> not be >> able to know to follow certain image links if they do not >> have an >> alt tag with a description. Nor would she be able to read >> the large >> image map about Internet governance as it is a jpg with no >> descriptive text. >> >> Sandra, these are two examples of accessibility errors on the >> myICANN website. The website in itself is user-friendly and >> I hope >> that there are only a few accessibility issues to fix. >> >> The W3C WCAG 2.0 guidelines may have been overlooked by the >> web >> developers but I hope that this is now being dealt with, >> Carlton. >> >> It would be great to get feedback from staff about this >> issue. >> >> As both Olivier and Sala have intimated, accessibility for >> people >> with disability will help to make ICANN truly inclusive. It >> actually >> goes beyond web accessibility of ICANN sites and should be >> incorporated into wider policy and processes even relating >> to new gTLDs. >> >> Regards, >> Gunela >> >> >> On 17/10/12 8:27 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote: >> >> Dear Olivier, >> >> Gunela is an extraordinary advocate and has >> consistently raised W3C >> issues in various foras both nationally, regionally and >> globally. I will >> never forget when at a PACINET Annual Conference which >> is an annual >> meeting organised by the ALS that I subscribe to in >> American >> Samoa last >> year when I saw this blind Samoan girl conduct a demo >> with her >> machine >> and articulate confidently and articulately her desire >> for >> accessibility. Our ALS have a number of advocates who >> despite the >> numerous physical challenges continue to make an impact >> in >> discussions >> and in running initiatives in their countries in Tonga, >> Samoa >> and Fiji. >> >> For the ordinary end user there are elements of >> accessibility >> that the >> global community should consider. I would also like to >> take this >> time to >> thank Gunela for reminding us of this important cause. >> >> Warm Regards, >> Sala >> >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Carlton Samuels >> <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.**com <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com>> >> <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.**__com >> <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.**com <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com>>> >> <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail. >> <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.**>____com >> >> >> <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.**__com >> <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.**com <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com>>>>> >> wrote: >> >> The simple response is to ask staff to verify if >> the W3C web >> accessibility >> guidelines were adopted for the website. And if >> not, why not? >> >> Failing, I would ask if any assistive technologies >> were >> contemplated at >> all? And if not, what are the plans for remediation. >> >> - Carlton >> >> ============================== >> Carlton A Samuels >> Mobile: 876-818-1799 >> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & >> Turnaround* >> ============================= >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Olivier MJ >> Crepin-Leblond >> <ocl(a)gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com> >> <mailto:ocl@gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com>> <mailto:ocl@gih.com >> <mailto:ocl@gih.com> >> >> <mailto:ocl@gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com>>>>wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> > For your information, please be so kind to find >> an email >> sent by >> one of >> > our members in Australia regarding >> accessibility, including >> > accessibility of the new myICANN.org Web site. >> > I believe there is a deeper implication to make >> ICANN as >> well as its >> > bottom-up policy processes and its communication >> strategy more >> > accessible to everyone. Comments welcome! >> > Kind regards, >> > >> > Olivier >> > >> > -------- Original Message -------- >> > Subject: ALAC and accessibility for >> people with >> disability >> > Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:12:59 +1100 >> > From: Gunela Astbrink <g.astbrink(a)*.au> >> > To: ocl(a)gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com> >> <mailto:ocl@gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com>> <mailto:ocl@gih.com >> <mailto:ocl@gih.com> >> <mailto:ocl@gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com>>> >> > CC: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr(a)*.com>, >> Save Vocea >> <save.vocea@ >> > *.org> >> > >> > >> > >> > Dear Olivier, >> > >> > Unfortunately, I won't be at the Toronto ICANN >> meeting. >> > >> > I remember we have had discussions about >> accessibility >> for people >> with >> > disability in the past. >> > >> > The new myICANN website has prompted me to >> contact you. >> > >> > The ICANN websites have accessibility errors >> including >> the brand new >> > myICANN. That looks like a great site and is >> intended >> for the general >> > public. Thus, people with disability who >> comprise one >> billion >> people in >> > the world should have adequate access. >> > >> > I was invited to participate in the >> consultation for a >> new At-Large >> > website and hope that it will incorporate >> accessibility >> based on >> the Web >> > Content Accessibility Guidelines version 2.0 >> (WCAG 2.0) >> right >> from the >> > start. http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/__** >> __wcag.php <http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/____wcag.php> >> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/_**_wcag.php<http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/__wcag.php> >> > >> >> >> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/_**_wcag.php<http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/__wcag.php> >> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/**wcag.php<http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag.php> >> >> >> > >> > I am very concerned that accessibility should be >> considered in new >> > policy or process. >> > >> > ISOC are about to launch a policy paper on >> Internet >> accessibility for >> > people with disability (drafted by me). >> > >> > I'd like to see ICANN also taking this issue on >> in a >> systematic >> way. For >> > example, mechanisms could be considered on how to >> encourage new >> gTLDs to >> > consider accessibility. >> > >> > Happy to discuss further. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Gunela >> > >> > -- >> > Gunela Astbrink >> > GSA Information Consultants >> > PO Box 600 >> > Ballina NSW 2478 >> > Australia >> > Mobile: +61 417 715738 >> <tel:%2B61%20417%20715738> <tel:%2B61%20417%20715738> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala >> P.O. Box 17862 >> Suva >> Fiji >> >> Twitter: @SalanietaT >> Skype:Salanieta.**Tamanikaiwaimaro >> Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851 >> >> >> >> > -- > Gunela Astbrink > GSA Information Consultants > PO Box 600 > Ballina NSW 2478 > Australia > Mobile: +61 417 715738 > Email: g.astbrink(a)gsa.com.au > -- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala P.O. Box 17862 Suva Fiji Twitter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851

1 0

Re: [ALAC] Fwd: ALAC and accessibility for people with disability
by Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro Oct. 18, 2012

Oct. 18, 2012

Thanks Gunela, the Hungary proposal that I had mentioned was their proposal in terms of the review of the ITRs in WCIT 12. Best Regards, On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Gunela Astbrink <g.astbrink(a)gsa.com.au>wrote: > Useful update from Sala. > > The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has been > signed by 154 countries with 125 ratifications and as you say, Sala, the US > has not ratified yet. > > With regard to WCIT, you might be interested in the ITU-T Resolution 70 on > telecommunications/ICT accessibility for people with disabilities > http://www.itu.int/pub/T-RES-**T.70-2008<http://www.itu.int/pub/T-RES-T.70-2008> > > This states that consideration of accessibility should be taken in > standards development. I'd like to see this integrated approach in ICANN > processes too. It's more than web accessibility. > > Gunela > > > On 19/10/12 4:48 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote: > >> Streaming into the Caribbean WCIT Consultations and learning alot: >> >> Also interesting to note the following: >> >> * There is a United Nations Convention on Rights of Persons with >> >> Disabilities on this area, see: >> http://www.un.org/**disabilities/default.asp?id=**150<http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=150>(Whilst the US >> signed, it did not ratify the same. Although other countries have) >> * There is a submission by Hungary in the review of the ITRs to add a >> >> component to enable access for disabled persons and they are >> proposing 8(b) which countries should get behind as it is central to >> the issue of Access; >> * Whilst there have been other resolutions from the plenipotentiaries, >> >> where it was resolved that a Fund be created, only Cyprus has been >> giving money into the that Fund >> >> >> Much awareness still has to be done apparently for access. >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Gunela Astbrink <g.astbrink(a)gsa.com.au >> <mailto:g.astbrink@gsa.com.au>**> wrote: >> >> Hi Sala, >> >> Thank you so much for your kind words. It's good to hear that the >> session I organised at PacINET on accessibility made an impact. >> >> Faaolo Utumapu from Samoa demonstrated how her screen reading >> software with speech synthesis works and how she can navigate >> through accessible websites. She also demonstrated how barriers are >> placed in front of her when websites are not accessible. For >> example, if she were to use the myICANN website, she would not be >> able to know to follow certain image links if they do not have an >> alt tag with a description. Nor would she be able to read the large >> image map about Internet governance as it is a jpg with no >> descriptive text. >> >> Sandra, these are two examples of accessibility errors on the >> myICANN website. The website in itself is user-friendly and I hope >> that there are only a few accessibility issues to fix. >> >> The W3C WCAG 2.0 guidelines may have been overlooked by the web >> developers but I hope that this is now being dealt with, Carlton. >> >> It would be great to get feedback from staff about this issue. >> >> As both Olivier and Sala have intimated, accessibility for people >> with disability will help to make ICANN truly inclusive. It actually >> goes beyond web accessibility of ICANN sites and should be >> incorporated into wider policy and processes even relating to new >> gTLDs. >> >> Regards, >> Gunela >> >> >> On 17/10/12 8:27 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote: >> >> Dear Olivier, >> >> Gunela is an extraordinary advocate and has consistently raised >> W3C >> issues in various foras both nationally, regionally and >> globally. I will >> never forget when at a PACINET Annual Conference which is an >> annual >> meeting organised by the ALS that I subscribe to in American >> Samoa last >> year when I saw this blind Samoan girl conduct a demo with her >> machine >> and articulate confidently and articulately her desire for >> accessibility. Our ALS have a number of advocates who despite the >> numerous physical challenges continue to make an impact in >> discussions >> and in running initiatives in their countries in Tonga, Samoa >> and Fiji. >> >> For the ordinary end user there are elements of accessibility >> that the >> global community should consider. I would also like to take this >> time to >> thank Gunela for reminding us of this important cause. >> >> Warm Regards, >> Sala >> >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Carlton Samuels >> <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.**com<carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> >> > >> <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.**__com >> >> <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.**com <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com>>>> >> wrote: >> >> The simple response is to ask staff to verify if the W3C web >> accessibility >> guidelines were adopted for the website. And if not, why >> not? >> >> Failing, I would ask if any assistive technologies were >> contemplated at >> all? And if not, what are the plans for remediation. >> >> - Carlton >> >> ============================== >> Carlton A Samuels >> Mobile: 876-818-1799 >> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* >> ============================= >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >> <ocl(a)gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com> <mailto:ocl@gih.com >> >> <mailto:ocl@gih.com>>>wrote: >> >> >> > >> > For your information, please be so kind to find an email >> sent by >> one of >> > our members in Australia regarding accessibility, >> including >> > accessibility of the new myICANN.org Web site. >> > I believe there is a deeper implication to make ICANN as >> well as its >> > bottom-up policy processes and its communication >> strategy more >> > accessible to everyone. Comments welcome! >> > Kind regards, >> > >> > Olivier >> > >> > -------- Original Message -------- >> > Subject: ALAC and accessibility for people with >> disability >> > Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:12:59 +1100 >> > From: Gunela Astbrink <g.astbrink(a)*.au> >> > To: ocl(a)gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com> <mailto:ocl@gih.com >> <mailto:ocl@gih.com>> >> > CC: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr(a)*.com>, Save Vocea >> <save.vocea@ >> > *.org> >> > >> > >> > >> > Dear Olivier, >> > >> > Unfortunately, I won't be at the Toronto ICANN meeting. >> > >> > I remember we have had discussions about accessibility >> for people >> with >> > disability in the past. >> > >> > The new myICANN website has prompted me to contact you. >> > >> > The ICANN websites have accessibility errors including >> the brand new >> > myICANN. That looks like a great site and is intended >> for the general >> > public. Thus, people with disability who comprise one >> billion >> people in >> > the world should have adequate access. >> > >> > I was invited to participate in the consultation for a >> new At-Large >> > website and hope that it will incorporate accessibility >> based on >> the Web >> > Content Accessibility Guidelines version 2.0 (WCAG 2.0) >> right >> from the >> > start. http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/__**wcag.php<http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/__wcag.php> >> >> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/**wcag.php<http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag.php> >> > >> > >> > I am very concerned that accessibility should be >> considered in new >> > policy or process. >> > >> > ISOC are about to launch a policy paper on Internet >> accessibility for >> > people with disability (drafted by me). >> > >> > I'd like to see ICANN also taking this issue on in a >> systematic >> way. For >> > example, mechanisms could be considered on how to >> encourage new >> gTLDs to >> > consider accessibility. >> > >> > Happy to discuss further. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Gunela >> > >> > -- >> > Gunela Astbrink >> > GSA Information Consultants >> > PO Box 600 >> > Ballina NSW 2478 >> > Australia >> > Mobile: +61 417 715738 <tel:%2B61%20417%20715738> >> >> -- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala P.O. Box 17862 Suva Fiji Twitter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851

1 0

Re: [ALAC] Fwd: ALAC and accessibility for people with disability
by Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro Oct. 18, 2012

Oct. 18, 2012

Streaming into the Caribbean WCIT Consultations and learning alot: Also interesting to note the following: - There is a United Nations Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities on this area, see: http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=150 (Whilst the US signed, it did not ratify the same. Although other countries have) - There is a submission by Hungary in the review of the ITRs to add a component to enable access for disabled persons and they are proposing 8(b) which countries should get behind as it is central to the issue of Access; - Whilst there have been other resolutions from the plenipotentiaries, where it was resolved that a Fund be created, only Cyprus has been giving money into the that Fund Much awareness still has to be done apparently for access. On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Gunela Astbrink <g.astbrink(a)gsa.com.au>wrote: > Hi Sala, > > Thank you so much for your kind words. It's good to hear that the session > I organised at PacINET on accessibility made an impact. > > Faaolo Utumapu from Samoa demonstrated how her screen reading software > with speech synthesis works and how she can navigate through accessible > websites. She also demonstrated how barriers are placed in front of her > when websites are not accessible. For example, if she were to use the > myICANN website, she would not be able to know to follow certain image > links if they do not have an alt tag with a description. Nor would she be > able to read the large image map about Internet governance as it is a jpg > with no descriptive text. > > Sandra, these are two examples of accessibility errors on the myICANN > website. The website in itself is user-friendly and I hope that there are > only a few accessibility issues to fix. > > The W3C WCAG 2.0 guidelines may have been overlooked by the web developers > but I hope that this is now being dealt with, Carlton. > > It would be great to get feedback from staff about this issue. > > As both Olivier and Sala have intimated, accessibility for people with > disability will help to make ICANN truly inclusive. It actually goes beyond > web accessibility of ICANN sites and should be incorporated into wider > policy and processes even relating to new gTLDs. > > Regards, > Gunela > > > On 17/10/12 8:27 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote: > >> Dear Olivier, >> >> Gunela is an extraordinary advocate and has consistently raised W3C >> issues in various foras both nationally, regionally and globally. I will >> never forget when at a PACINET Annual Conference which is an annual >> meeting organised by the ALS that I subscribe to in American Samoa last >> year when I saw this blind Samoan girl conduct a demo with her machine >> and articulate confidently and articulately her desire for >> accessibility. Our ALS have a number of advocates who despite the >> numerous physical challenges continue to make an impact in discussions >> and in running initiatives in their countries in Tonga, Samoa and Fiji. >> >> For the ordinary end user there are elements of accessibility that the >> global community should consider. I would also like to take this time to >> thank Gunela for reminding us of this important cause. >> >> Warm Regards, >> Sala >> >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Carlton Samuels >> <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.**com<carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com>>> >> wrote: >> >> The simple response is to ask staff to verify if the W3C web >> accessibility >> guidelines were adopted for the website. And if not, why not? >> >> Failing, I would ask if any assistive technologies were contemplated >> at >> all? And if not, what are the plans for remediation. >> >> - Carlton >> >> ============================== >> Carlton A Samuels >> Mobile: 876-818-1799 >> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* >> ============================= >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >> <ocl(a)gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com>>wrote: >> >> >> > >> > For your information, please be so kind to find an email sent by >> one of >> > our members in Australia regarding accessibility, including >> > accessibility of the new myICANN.org Web site. >> > I believe there is a deeper implication to make ICANN as well as >> its >> > bottom-up policy processes and its communication strategy more >> > accessible to everyone. Comments welcome! >> > Kind regards, >> > >> > Olivier >> > >> > -------- Original Message -------- >> > Subject: ALAC and accessibility for people with disability >> > Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:12:59 +1100 >> > From: Gunela Astbrink <g.astbrink(a)*.au> >> > To: ocl(a)gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com> >> > CC: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr(a)*.com>, Save Vocea >> <save.vocea@ >> > *.org> >> > >> > >> > >> > Dear Olivier, >> > >> > Unfortunately, I won't be at the Toronto ICANN meeting. >> > >> > I remember we have had discussions about accessibility for people >> with >> > disability in the past. >> > >> > The new myICANN website has prompted me to contact you. >> > >> > The ICANN websites have accessibility errors including the brand >> new >> > myICANN. That looks like a great site and is intended for the >> general >> > public. Thus, people with disability who comprise one billion >> people in >> > the world should have adequate access. >> > >> > I was invited to participate in the consultation for a new At-Large >> > website and hope that it will incorporate accessibility based on >> the Web >> > Content Accessibility Guidelines version 2.0 (WCAG 2.0) right >> from the >> > start. http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/**wcag.php<http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag.php> >> > >> > I am very concerned that accessibility should be considered in new >> > policy or process. >> > >> > ISOC are about to launch a policy paper on Internet accessibility >> for >> > people with disability (drafted by me). >> > >> > I'd like to see ICANN also taking this issue on in a systematic >> way. For >> > example, mechanisms could be considered on how to encourage new >> gTLDs to >> > consider accessibility. >> > >> > Happy to discuss further. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Gunela >> > >> > -- >> > Gunela Astbrink >> > GSA Information Consultants >> > PO Box 600 >> > Ballina NSW 2478 >> > Australia >> > Mobile: +61 417 715738 <tel:%2B61%20417%20715738> >> > Email: g.astbrink(a)gsa.com.au <mailto:g.astbrink@gsa.com.au> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ______________________________**_________________ >> > ALAC mailing list >> > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.** >> icann.org <ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>> >> >> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.**org/mailman/listinfo/alac<https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac> >> > >> > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org >> > ALAC Working Wiki: >> > >> https://community.icann.org/**display/atlarge/At-Large+** >> Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL…> >> > >> ______________________________**_________________ >> ALAC mailing list >> ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.**icann.org<ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >> > >> >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.**org/mailman/listinfo/alac<https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac> >> >> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org >> ALAC Working Wiki: >> https://community.icann.org/**display/atlarge/At-Large+** >> Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL…> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala >> P.O. Box 17862 >> Suva >> Fiji >> >> Twitter: @SalanietaT >> Skype:Salanieta.**Tamanikaiwaimaro >> Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851 >> >> >> >> > -- > Gunela Astbrink > GSA Information Consultants > PO Box 600 > Ballina NSW 2478 > Australia > Mobile: +61 417 715738 > Email: g.astbrink(a)gsa.com.au > -- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala P.O. Box 17862 Suva Fiji Twitter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851

1 0

Toronto Schedule / Wednesday 17 October 2012
by At-Large Staff Oct. 17, 2012

Oct. 17, 2012

Dear All, Please find hereafter the At-Large schedule for tomorrow, Wednesday 17 October 2012 with all remote participation details listed on the ICANN Schedule: Wiki Agenda page: http://tinyurl.com/8lujxkj ICANN Schedule: http://toronto45.icann.org/full-schedule * 07:00 08:00 NARALO Capacity Building Session 3 Regatta Room http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34371 * 07:00 - 10:00: Academy Working Group Session Queen's Quay 2 http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34367 * 08:00 - 09:00: Joint NARALO/Fellows Meeting 3 Frontenac http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34173 * 09:00 - 11:00: NARALO General Assembly Regatta http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34393 * 11:00 - 12:30: ALAC & NCSG Meeting (NOT on public schedule) Dockside 5 * 12:30 - 14:30: At-Large Regional Leadership Meeting Regatta http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34379 * 15:30 - 16:30: At-Large New gTLD Review Group Meeting Regatta http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34341 * 16:30 18:00: At-Large IDN Working Group Regatta http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34329 * 19:00 - 23:00: GALA Evening by invitation only http://toronto45.icann.org/gala General Meetings: http://toronto45.icann.org/full-schedule Please refer to full Schedule: Other Meetings: * 09:00 - 10:30: The Multistakeholder model from the NGO's perspective (Panelists including Jean-Jacques, Rinalia and Evan) Dockside 5 http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34391 * 09:00 - 10:30: Latin America and the Caribbean Stakeholders Engagement and Outreach Metro East http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34389 * 11:00 - 12:30: ICANN Finance Update Session Regatta http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34405 * 15:00 - 16:30: Multi-Stakeholder Discussion: Legacy Internet Protocol (IP) Numbers in the Current Policy Environment Harbour AB http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34377 * 15:00 - 18:30: GNSO Council Meeting Metro Centre http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34377 Thank you. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie Peregrine ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org

1 1

Fwd: ALAC and accessibility for people with disability
by Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Oct. 17, 2012

Oct. 17, 2012

For your information, please be so kind to find an email sent by one of our members in Australia regarding accessibility, including accessibility of the new myICANN.org Web site. I believe there is a deeper implication to make ICANN as well as its bottom-up policy processes and its communication strategy more accessible to everyone. Comments welcome! Kind regards, Olivier -------- Original Message -------- Subject: ALAC and accessibility for people with disability Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:12:59 +1100 From: Gunela Astbrink <g.astbrink(a)*.au> To: ocl(a)gih.com CC: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr(a)*.com>, Save Vocea <save.vocea(a)*.org> Dear Olivier, Unfortunately, I won't be at the Toronto ICANN meeting. I remember we have had discussions about accessibility for people with disability in the past. The new myICANN website has prompted me to contact you. The ICANN websites have accessibility errors including the brand new myICANN. That looks like a great site and is intended for the general public. Thus, people with disability who comprise one billion people in the world should have adequate access. I was invited to participate in the consultation for a new At-Large website and hope that it will incorporate accessibility based on the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines version 2.0 (WCAG 2.0) right from the start. http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag.php I am very concerned that accessibility should be considered in new policy or process. ISOC are about to launch a policy paper on Internet accessibility for people with disability (drafted by me). I'd like to see ICANN also taking this issue on in a systematic way. For example, mechanisms could be considered on how to encourage new gTLDs to consider accessibility. Happy to discuss further. Regards, Gunela -- Gunela Astbrink GSA Information Consultants PO Box 600 Ballina NSW 2478 Australia Mobile: +61 417 715738 Email: g.astbrink(a)gsa.com.au

4 3

Additional Meeting Toronto / Wednesday 17 October - ALAC & NCSG meeting
by At-Large Staff Oct. 17, 2012

Oct. 17, 2012

Dear All, An informal ALAC & NCSG Meeting has been confirmed on Wednesday 17 October 2012 from 11:00am to 12:30pm in Dockside 5. Anyone interested in the URS discussion is welcome to join. http://toronto45.icann.org/files/meetings/toronto2012/45-Toronto-VenueMap-3O ct12.png Please note that this meeting is NOT on the public schedule and no remote participation nor audio visual is available. Please note the Agenda: 1/Consolidated meetings strategy 2/URS Thank you. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie Peregrine ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org

1 1

Fwd: Re: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] a modest amendment to our charter point on "privacy and data protection"
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 16, 2012

Oct. 16, 2012

FYI, my reply to the Thick Whois DT. Alan >To: "Gnso-thickwhois-dt(a)icann.org DT" <Gnso-thickwhois-dt(a)icann.org> >From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> >Subject: Re: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] a modest amendment to our charter >point on "privacy and data protection" > >I have surveyed the ALAC on the new wording that Avri has supplied. >The consensus (but not unanimous) view is that the current wording >in the Proposed charter should stand. > >The issue raised in Avri's message that I have copied below formed >part (but not all) of the rationale. Although I personally do not >believe that there is any substantive issue related to mentioned >rights and thick/thin Whois, *IF* this is indeed an issue, then is >has far wider impact that the narrow scope of this PDP allows, and >should be the subject of a separate PDP. > >Alan > >At 15/10/2012 08:54 PM, Avri Doria wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>In sense though ww will also be talking about how thick whois is to >>be done by all registries. >>Both in the new gTLDs and the incumbents, even those already doing thick. >>So this affects every Registry, every Registrar and every Registrant. >> >>And there are, in my view, jurisdictional implications in Thick >>Whois that are different from Thin Whois. Most of these center >>around the fact that once the Registry also has the Whois info as >>opposed to just the Registrar, people in Canada, e.g., no longer >>have the data privacy, consumer etc rights they have in Canada, >>because someone can base demands etc on the laws of the Registry's >>country of business as well. >> >>avri

1 0

ELECTION SUMMARY: ALAC Liaisons to serve from October 2012 to ICANN AGM 2013
by Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Oct. 15, 2012

Oct. 15, 2012

Dear All, According to Rule 4 of the ALAC Internal Rules of Procedure https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/27854147/AL-2007-1-1-Rev11… Liaisons to ICANN's Advisory Committees, Supporting Organizations and Constituencies can be established by approval of the Committee; in that case, they will follow the rules established for the appointment and functioning of the GNSO Liaison. The stage of nominations having been undertaken, it is now time to discuss those nominations. The following is a list of the current positions: · GNSO liaison -- Currently held by Alan Greenberg <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Alan+Greenberg+SOI> · ccNSO -- Currently held by Cheryl Langdon-Orr · SSAC -- Currently held by Julie Hammer <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Julie+Hammer+SOI> · IDN Policy -- Currently held by Edmon Chung <https://community.icann.org/display/APRALO/Edmon+Chung+-+Bio+and+Statement+…> · NCSG -- Currently held by Evan Leibovitch <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Evan+Leibovitch+SOI> The DotMobi Liaison position is remaining vacant pending clarification from DotMobi. All nominations are published on the relevant WIKI page: https://community.icann.org/x/sxYQAg The following nominations have been received: GNSO Liaison Alan Greenberg Nominated/seconded by: * Eduardo Diaz (Nom) * Carlton Samuels * Sala Tamanikaiwaimaro * Rinalia Abdul Rahim * Tijani Ben Jemaa * Yaovi Atohoun ccNSO Liaison: Cheryl Langdon-Orr Nominated/seconded by: * Sala Tamanikaiwaimaro (Nom) * Rinalia Abdul Rahim (Nom) * Eduardo Diaz (Nom) * Carlton Samuels * Tijani Ben Jemaa * Yaovi Atohoun SSAC Liaison: Julie Hammer Nominated/seconded by: * Tijani Ben Jemaa (Nom) * Sandra Hoferichter * Vanda Scartezini * Yaovi Atohoun * Sala Tamanikaiwaimaro IDN Policy Liaison: Edmon Chung Nominated/seconded by: * Rinalia Abdul Rahim (Nom) * Tijani Ben Jemaa * Sandra Hoferichter * Yaovi Atohoun NCSG Liaison: Evan Leibovitch Nominated/seconded by: * Tijani Ben Jemaa (Nom) * Sandra Hoferichter (Nom) * Yaovi Atohoun *2012-2103 ALAC Liaison Selection Schedule: * * 4 October 2012 - Call for Expressions of Interest (to be sent to lists.) * 10 October 2012 - Deadline for Liaison Nominations (to be sent to lists.) * 15 October 2012 - Chair to post to the public ALAC list an "election summary" message (sent to lists). * 15-18 October 2012 - Nominations are discussed. * 19 October 2012 - Deadline for Nominees to Accept their Nomination (sent to lists and or as notified and recorded on the relevant Election Pages of the At-Large Wiki.) * 22-26 October 2012 - Selection of ALAC Liaisons -- if elections are required, they will be held 22-26 October 2012. Where only one nomination is received for any Liaison position, the nominee will be confirmed in that role on 19 October 2012 * 26 October 2012 - Selection/Election Results announced and any unconfirmed Liaisons begin in their roles. *Relevant Rules from the ALAC Rules of Procedure: * RULE 4 - ELECTION OF LIAISONS 4.1 Liaisons to ICANN's Advisory Committees, Supporting Organizations and Constituencies can be established by approval of the Committee; in that case, they will follow the rules established for the appointment and functioning of the GNSO Liaison 4.2 **Refers to *The Board Liaison*, and is therefore not relevant here, and will be redacted from the revised ALAC ROPs* 4.3 The election can take place by electronic mail, online balloting, written balloting, or any other means deemed convenient and accurate 4.4 All liaisons serve for a term of one year starting from the closure of an Annual General Meeting and ending at the closure of the following Annual General Meeting. 4.5 Liaisons shall be freely chosen by the ALAC, according to the following criteria: 4.6 They shall normally be persons who are current or former members of the ALAC, or are anyway familiar with the activities and functioning of ICANN and of the ALAC; 4.7 They shall accept to serve on behalf of the At-Large Community by acting for the good of the entire Committee, working to bridge differences and build consensus, but also recognizing difference and enabling different opinions to be shared; 4.8 They shall accept, while acting in their capacity as an ALAC representative, to put the collective views of the ALAC, always, in front of their own. RULE 5 - QUALIFICATION CRITERIA FOR LIAISONS 5.1 There is no requirement for a Liaison to be a member of the At-Large Advisory Committee;* 5.2 A conflict of interest statement must be filed; 5.3 A person may not serve two different liaison positions at the same time; 5.4 All liaisons can be removed before the end of their term by a vote of recall according to rule 11; 5.5 All liaisons have a duty of performing their roles with diligence and loyalty to the Committee, and are bound to meet the minimum participation requirements set forth in Rule 21. In case of failure to do so, the Chair shall call a vote of recall. The mission and responsibilities of each Liaison of the ALAC are: 5.6 To participate diligently in the meetings and activities of the body he/she is liaison to; 5.7 To communicate and advocate the positions of the ALAC to such body; 5.8 To report to the ALAC the current and upcoming activities of the body he/she is liaison to, as far as this is possible under the timing and confidentiality constraints of such *body;* 5.9 When this is possible under such constraints, ask to the ALAC for advance instructions on matters that are going to be discussed by such body. RULE 6 - PRIVILEGES OF LIAISONS 6.1 All liaisons have the same rights of access to information, mailing lists and documents *as the ordinary ALAC members.* *PLEASE NOTE:* With the exception of the ALAC ByLaw-mandated liaisons to the GNSO and the ccNSO, there is no assured travel finding for ALAC Liaisons to attend ICANN Meetings unless they are serving ALAC members. Therefore, assurances that they can still perform their role will be required. *The 2012-2013 ALAC Liaison Election - Schedule and Nominees Workspace:* This workspace is available at https://community.icann.org/x/lZEoAg. It includes the following additional important information: · Qualification criteria for liaisons; · Privileges of liaisons; · Election procedures, including specific procedures for the ALAC liaison to the SSAC; · A table listing who has been nominated for the various liaison positions. Kind regards, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond ALAC Chair

4 3

Report on RAA update meeting
by h.raiche＠internode.on.net Oct. 15, 2012

Oct. 15, 2012

Hi everyone This is a report (PDF, Word - take your pick) on today's session on the RAA update. It will feed into our response to yesterday's meeting with Compliance. Matt - could ypu put this up as a report while I attend this meeting Thanks Holly

1 0

Fwd: ICANN News Alert -- ICANN Consolidated Meetings Strategy Proposal
by Rinalia Abdul Rahim Oct. 15, 2012

Oct. 15, 2012

This issue will hit some aspiring developing countries hard and affect diversity. I think the ALAC needs to respond to this. It is difficult to argue against the facilities requirement with an increasingly growing ICANN meeting size, but the least that they should do is continuously and progressively identify newly emerging sites in developing countries that meet the criteria so that the pool of potential sites grows in support of diversity. I look forward to hear the opinion of others, especially on the regional rotation proposal contained in the document (ie., for the period between 2014-2016 first meeting of the year in 2 cities in Asia Pacific, second meeting in 2 cities in Europe and third meeting rotated among other regions). Best regards, Rinalia Abdul Rahim sent via galaxy tab ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "ICANN News Alert" <communications(a)icann.org> Date: 3 Oct 2012 08:22 Subject: ICANN News Alert -- ICANN Consolidated Meetings Strategy Proposal To: <rinalia.abdulrahim(a)gmail.com> ICANN News Alert http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-02oct12-en.htm ____________________________________ ICANN Consolidated Meetings Strategy Proposal 2 October 2012 Comment Period Opens on 2 October 2012 Categories/Tags: * Policy Processes * Transparency/Accountability * Reviews/Improvements * Participation * Events/Conferences * Operations/Finances Purpose (Brief): The ICANN meeting operations department is submitting for public comment a proposal on a Consolidated Meetings Strategy for ICANN Public Meetings. The purpose of this document is to advise the ICANN community of the issues surrounding the current process for selecting ICANN Public Meeting locations, and to propose an alternate method of doing so. Public Comment Box Link: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/meetings-proposal-2012-02oct12-… ____________________________________ This message was sent to rinalia.abdulrahim(a)gmail.com from: ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Manage Your Subscription: http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=20657474&l=6333&s=R4TD&m=89…

9 14