- ALAC - lists.icann.org

Vote: Appointment of ALAC Liaison to .mobi
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 30, 2016

Oct. 30, 2016

As previously reported on the ALAC-Internal list, the ALAC Appointee Selection Committee (AASC) could not reach a consensus position on who to recommend for the .mobi liaison from the ALAC for the 2016-17 year. Accordingly, I am requesting a vote of the ALAC to make the decision. There were two duly nominated and accepted candidates for the position currently held by Murray McKercher. The candidates were (in alphabetical order of last name) were Wafa Dahmani and Murray McKercher. There was some disagreement within the AASC on the interpretation of some of the statements provided by the candidates. Accordingly, I asked both candidates to provide short, concise statements to supplement their original statements. Attached to the message are the original documents provided by the candidates as well as the new summary document. With this message, I am initiating a secret ballot vote of the ALAC to select the ALAC Liaison to .mobi for the 2016-17 year starting at the end of the ICANN 57 meeting in Hyderabad. The vote will start as soon as practical (given Staff travel to Hyderabad) and run for at least seven full days ending at 23:59 UTC of the last day. Alan

2 1

Approval of Charter for the CCWG on Use of gTLD Auction Proceeds
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 30, 2016

Oct. 30, 2016

The Draft Charter circulated earlier this month received no substantive comments which required changes to the draft document and nor did the associated Webinar. Accordingly, the Charter has been forwarded to the AC/SOs for approval. I have drafted the following Motion (liberally borrowing from a comparable GNSO motion). This will be on the agenda for discussion and approval during the Hyderabad meeting. Note that the period for comments on the charter is over, so it is really too late to make changes to the charter itself. Comments on the motion are appreciated. Note that for the CCWG-Stewardship, the ALAC chose not to have a co-chair, and for the CCWG-Accountability, we chose to have one of our five Members be a Co-Chair. In my mind, that latter decision gave the CCWG an excellent Co-Chair, but deprived the ALAC of one of its five voices in substantive discussion. Accordingly, I am suggesting that this time we identify a Co-Chair as part of our approval process. It would need to be someone with strong ICANN experience, strong chairing skills, preferably someone with subject-matter knowledge, and someone who is willing to NOT participate in the substantive discussion to be held in the CCWG. And of urse willing to put substantive time into the process. Alan ======================================= DRAFT ALAC Motion - Adoption of the Charter for a Cross-Community Working Group on new gTLD Auction Proceeds Whereas, 1. Following a number of sessions on the topic of new gTLD Auction proceeds during the ICANN53 in Buenos Aires (see https://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-soac-high-interest and https://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-cwg-new-gtld-auction) a discussion paper <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/auctions/proceeds/discussion-paper-…> was published in September 2015 to solicit further community input on this topic as well as the proposal to proceed with a CCWG on this topic. 2. As the feedback received on the discussion paper confirmed the support for moving forward with a CCWG, the GNSO Chair, reached out to all the ICANN Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees to ask for volunteers to participate in a drafting team to develop a charter for a CCWG on this topic. All ICANN SO/ACs, apart from the ccNSO, responded to this request and put forward volunteers to participate in the drafting team. 3. The GNSO Council appointed Jonathan Robinson to chair the Drafting Team ('DT'), which commenced its deliberations on Tuesday 23 February 2016. Alan Greenberg one of the ALAC volunteers agreed to act as Vice-Chair. 4. The DT published a draft charter for community discussion in advance of ICANN 56 which was discussed during the cross-community session<http://sched.co/7NE0> held at ICANN56. Following ICANN56, the DT reviewed all the input received<https://community.icann.org/x/fgmbAw> and updated the proposed charter accordingly. On 13 September 2016, this proposed charter<https://community.icann.org/x/mRuOAw> was shared with all ICANN SO/ACs with the request to review it and identify any pertinent issues that would prevent adoption of the charter, if any. 5. Subsequently, a webinar was held on 13 October 2016 to allow for some additional time and information to undertake this review (see https://community.icann.org/x/gh_4Aw) 6. As no pertinent issues were raised, the DT submitted the proposed CCWG charter (see <https://community.icann.org/x/mRuOAw)>) for consideration to all ICANN SO/ACs on 17 October 2016 Resolved, 1. The ALAC approves the Charter<https://community.icann.org/x/mRuOAw>. 2. The ALAC appoints [Name] as the ALAC Appointed Co-Chair to 3. Each RALO will appoint one member for the CCWG by taking into account the charter requirement that best efforts should be made to ensure that members: a) Have sufficient and appropriate motivation (and ideally expertise) to participate in the substance of the work of the CCWG. Appropriate experience could, for example, include experience with allocation and final disbursement of funds; b) Commit to actively participate in the activities of the CCWG on an on-going and long-term basis; c) Solicit and communicate (where appropriate) the views and concerns of individuals in the RALO that appoints them; d) Commit to abide to the charter when participating in the CCWG; e) Understand the needs of the Internet communities that ICANN serves (standards, domains and numbers); f) Understand the broader ecosystem (the Internet Community) in which ICANN operates and the needs of those working on other aspects of the Internet industry, including those not yet connected. Furthermore, in addition to a Statement of Interest, all members and participants will be required to provide a declaration on intention to apply for (or in any way support the application for) new gTLD Auction Proceeds, either as an individual or through the entity you are representing or employed by otr are otherwise funded by or affiliated with or support/endorse. It will be mandatory to report any changes in relation to these intentions throughout the CCWG life-cycle. 4. The ALAC will collaborate with the other SOs and ACs to issue a call for participants and observers to join the CCWG, each in accordance with its own rules.

1 0

Re: [ALAC] 2016-[2018]2017 ALAC Leadership Team
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 30, 2016

Oct. 30, 2016

Our sharp reader, Seun, has noted the error in the subject line. It should be 2016-17 to match the text - and our Rules! This was not a subtle ploy to change all terms to two years. Just the effect of too many hours in the air without sleep. Alan At 29/10/2016 12:15 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote: >Nominations for the 2016-17 ALT closed on 21 >October 2016. Four nominations had been received, one per region: > >AFRALO: Tijani Ben Jemaa >APRALO: Holly Raiche >EURALO: Veronica Cretu >LACRALO: León Sanchez > >All four have accepted the nomination. Our RoP >call for the ALT to be determined by a consensus >of the ALAC, and barring that by secret ballot. >Given that only one person was nominated for >each of the regions involved, I have to conclude >that there was no support for any other >candidate and I judge there is a consensus that >Tijani, Holly, Veronica and León serve as the ALT for the forthcoming year. > >I congratulate all four. I could not be more pleased with the team. > >All four candidates were also nominated to be >Vice-Chair. Veronica declined the nomination and >all three others accepted. In my mind, all three >are excellent Vice-Chair candidates who I would happy to have on my team. > >Holly has indicated that although she is willing >to serve, her preference is to focus on the >At-Large Review as she would not have the time >to do justice to both simultaneously. I will >honor that and hereby name León Sanchez and >Tijani Ben Jemaa as ALAC Vice-Chairs for the coming year. > >Alan > >_______________________________________________ >ALAC mailing list >ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > >At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org >ALAC Working Wiki: >https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL…

2 1

Re: [ALAC] 2016-2018 ALAC Leadership Team
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 30, 2016

Oct. 30, 2016

Thanks Harold. We do have gender balance in the ALT overall (or as much balance as you can have with 5 people) and that was one of my main targets. Although balance in the V-Cs would be good for optics, it does not really impact the decision process. V-Cs commit to a higher level of work, but all ALT members are treated equally in terms of discussion and decisions (when there are decisions, which is not that often). In this particular case, both Veronica and Holly had time constraints which prevented them from taking on the extra load, and I am just grateful that they accepted to ALT position at all. Veronica in particular has just taken on a new role at home, one that was not expected when she decided to take on the ALAC Member position, and I was worried it might impact her decision to accept the ALT role. And both Tijani and León have a great history of tireless work on behalf of At-Large and ICANN! Alan At 29/10/2016 11:29 PM, Harold Arcos wrote: >Great news, Chair and Colleagues! > >All names does honor to their nominations. Only >I miss gender balance. I consider very important >the women opinion in function of leadership. > >Congratulations to the big examples that are our Vice-Chairs. > >Warm hug > >H > >On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Alan Greenberg ><<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> wrote: >Nominations for the 2016-17 ALT closed on 21 >October 2016. Four nominations had been received, one per region: > >AFRALO: Tijani Ben Jemaa >APRALO: Holly Raiche >EURALO: Veronica Cretu >LACRALO: LeÃ³n Sanchez > >All four have accepted the nomination. Our RoP >call for the ALT to be determined by a consensus >of the ALAC, and barring that by secret ballot. >Given that only one person was nominated for >each of the regions involved, I have to conclude >that there was no support for any other >candidate and I judge there is a consensus that >Tijani, Holly, Veronica and LeÃ³n serve as the ALT for the forthcoming year. > >I congratulate all four. I could not be more pleased with the team. > >All four candidates were also nominated to be >Vice-Chair. Veronica declined the nomination and >all three others accepted. In my mind, all three >are excellent Vice-Chair candidates who I would happy to have on my team. > >Holly has indicated that although she is willing >to serve, her preference is to focus on the >At-Large Review as she would not have the time >to do justice to both simultaneously. I will >honor that and hereby name LeÃ³n Sanchez and >Tijani Ben Jemaa as ALAC Vice-Chairs for the coming year. > >Alan > >_______________________________________________ >ALAC mailing list ><mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > >At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org >ALAC Working Wiki: ><https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL…>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… >

1 0

Fwd: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: URGENT: Cross Community working group on Internet Governance
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 29, 2016

Oct. 29, 2016

For your consideration and possible action. Alan -- Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos. -------- Original Message -------- From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com> Sent: October 29, 2016 8:26:23 AM GMT+01:00 To: "ccwg-internet-governance(a)icann.org" <ccwg-internet-governance(a)icann.org> Subject: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: URGENT: Cross Community working group on Internet Governance FYI -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: URGENT: Cross Community working group on Internet Governance Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 11:24:00 +0400 From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com> To: James M. Bladel <jbladel(a)godaddy.com>, Katrina Sataki <katrina(a)nic.lv>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca>, Patrik Fältström <patrik(a)frobbit.se> CC: GNSO Secretariats <gnso-secs(a)icann.org>, 'At Large Staff' <Staff(a)atlarge.icann.org>, ccnsosecretariat(a)icann.org, gacsec(a)gac.icann.org <gacsec(a)gac.icann.org>, 'Thomas Schneider' <thomas.schneider(a)bakom.admin.ch>, louie(a)louie.net <louie(a)louie.net>, ASO Secretariat <secretariat(a)aso.icann.org>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com> Dear Chairs of ICANN Supporting Organisations and Advisory Committees, please be so kind to find attached, a Statement of the members of the Cross Community Working Group on Internet Governance (CCWG-IG) relating to proposals currently being discussed at the World Telecommunications Standardization Assembly, WTSA16, 26 October - 3 November 2016. The CCWG-IG has monitored proposals presented by Member States and whilst several proposals were flagged as having a potential to impact ICANN, the proposal by the African Telecommunications Union (ATU) on behalf of several countries, to the World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (WTSA) regarding the use of geographic terms for top level domains, raised concerns. The CCWG-IG prepared the attached Statement in a bottom-up multistakeholder manner to remind WTSA participants that the use of geographic names in generic Top Level Domains (gTLDs) is covered by ICANN policy development processes, informed by GAC Advice. This Statement is forwarded to you for distribution to your membership, with the understanding that it could be useful to your members participating in the WTSA16 conference. The ICANN Communities participating in the working group reached Consensus on the attached text, according to the rules set in the CCWG-IG's Charter. Kindest regards, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond Rafik Dammak Young-Eum Lee Co-Chairs of the Cross Community Working Group on Internet Governance ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ ccwg-internet-governance mailing list ccwg-internet-governance(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance

2 1

Re: [ALAC] Fw: Preparations for ALAC/GAC meeting in Hyderabad
by Vanda Scartezini Oct. 28, 2016

Oct. 28, 2016

Not sure if it was all considered, but one point of interest is related to “under served regions”. Best to all. Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. [cid:image001.png@01D23065.EE9EA450] From: <alac-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Yrjö Länsipuro <yrjo_lansipuro(a)hotmail.com> Date: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 12:01 PM To: Sebastien Bacholet <sebastien(a)bachollet.com>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca>, 'ALAC List' <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>, ICANN Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Subject: [ALAC] Fw: Preparations for ALAC/GAC meeting in Hyderabad Hi Sébastien, all, Here's a copy of my e-mail to the CAG Secretariat. If someone can think of additional relevant statements, I would be glad to relay them to the GAC. Best, Yrjö ________________________________ From: Yrjö Länsipuro <yrjo_lansipuro(a)hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 11:10 PM To: Tom Dale Subject: Preparations for ALAC/GAC meeting in Hyderabad ________________________________ Hi Tom, As promised, here are a few pointers to recent ALAC statements on some of the topics agreed for the GAC/ALAC session in Hyderabad: 1. New gTLDs a) General process/timing: https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/9715 https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/9725 b) PICs https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/9783 https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/6561 https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/6591 <https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/6591> <https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/6591> ( 2. Diversity ) 3. CCT Review Recent statements about the general consumer trust, consumer choice, competition topic related to the new gTLDs https://community.icann.org/x/MASbAw https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/9867 https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/9745 1. Implementation of new Bylaws https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/9797 <https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/9797> In Hyderabad, I'll bring up to date information on ALAC thinking on these topics from its sessions that precede our joint meeting. Any comments on the draft description on the work of the ALAC/GAC Liaison? Best, Yrjö _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL…

4 3

ICANN57: A Real-Life Audio-Video Disaster Recovery Story - ICANN Blog by Ash Ragan
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 28, 2016

Oct. 28, 2016

ICANN57: A Real-Life Audio-Video Disaster Recovery Story Very few people realize what it actually takes to make an ICANN meeting run smoothly from the Network Operations Center backroom, where the InfoTech team orchestrates its magic with high energy. Youâve probably experienced the excellent remote capabilities to encourage diverse participation, good wifi on site, and generally, things run smoothly so you can focus on the real issues and discussions at hand. And this is a good thing. After Helsinki, we were starting to get prepared again...when we got the <https://www.icann.org/news/blog/fire-on-cargo-ship-affects-it-equipment-bou…>news that there was a fire aboard the ship which contained our equipment being transshipped from Helsinki to Hyderabad. (Spoiler alert: Iâm pleased to confirm all equipment is now in Hyderabad, and the team is setting up for what will again likely be an excellent meeting.) Let me share this remarkable disaster recovery story. When we began preparing for ICANN57 months ago, it was all fairly routine. We packed and shipped all of our technical equipment in a 40-foot and 20-foot sea container which included: 80+ crates containing over five miles of network cables, over 400 microphones, 650 international power strips, 75 MacBooks. We were preparing to get 800 mbps of bandwidth, at least two Internet service providers with redundant paths, and more. Within a week of the fire, we were told that the 40-foot container was in good shape, but the 20-foot container had possible damage from the fire and would be held for further inspection in Germany. We were instantly struck by the unique dimensions of this extraordinary incident. A fire on-board a seafaring container cargo ship, while the ship is docked in Germany, en-route to India. We also discovered how complicated the whole situation was given the ship belongs to an international company, the contents belong to a US corporation, the forwarding-agent is based in the US with inspection-rights governed by (200+ year old) maritime laws and with Insurance brokers and adjusters involved from both sides of the Atlantic. The multi-national dimensions of this incident were quite remarkable. We immediately made back up arrangements. Having catalogued exactly what was in each crate, we enacted two plans: a) a short-term plan to purchase replacement equipment so ICANN57 experiences no disruption; and b) a longer-term plan to work with insurance brokers (under maritime law) to recover the âstuckâ 20-foot container. This took a lot of work in a short amount of time, given the sophistication of our gear, which in total cost ICANN about $700,000 USD of unplanned expenses (the equipment itself plus shipping and other costs). But the real story is that of the ICANN InfoTech team. The manner in which this fire incident was handled is just another example of the professionalism and dedication that the ICANN org team members take to ensure we support the community. I am so proud of our team for working days, nights and weekends to work with every supplier, replace all equipment as well as pack it (our office was a bit of a mess!) and make arrangements to have it air-lifted to India. This was all to ensure that equipment would arrive in Hyderabad in time so that there will be no disruption to our service we provide at ICANN57. Take a look at this <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3h-qRxFLZF4>time-lapse video from ICANN49 to see just how much goes into setting up an ICANN Meeting. I wish everyone safe travels if youâre heading to India and hope to see many of you soon either iin person or online. Ash

3 2

Action Requested - Questions to raise with Steve Crocker during ICANN 57
by Heidi Ullrich Oct. 27, 2016

Oct. 27, 2016

Dear All, The Members of the ALAC and RALO Leaders will be meeting with Steve Crocker, Chairman of the ICANN Board, on 7 November during the Wrap Up 2 Session. Alan has requested that suggestions for topics to raise with Steve be sent either to this list or directly to him. Could you please send any suggestions by Tuesday, 1 November? Kind regards, Heidi Heidi Ullrich Senior Director for At-Large Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: + 1 (310) 578 - 8647 Fax: +1 (310) 823 - 8649 Mobile: +1 (310) 437 - 3956 E-mail: Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> [unknown.png]

1 0

Fw: Preparations for ALAC/GAC meeting in Hyderabad
by Yrjö Länsipuro Oct. 26, 2016

Oct. 26, 2016

Hi Sébastien, all, Here's a copy of my e-mail to the CAG Secretariat. If someone can think of additional relevant statements, I would be glad to relay them to the GAC. Best, Yrjö ________________________________ From: Yrjö Länsipuro <yrjo_lansipuro(a)hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 11:10 PM To: Tom Dale Subject: Preparations for ALAC/GAC meeting in Hyderabad ________________________________ Hi Tom, As promised, here are a few pointers to recent ALAC statements on some of the topics agreed for the GAC/ALAC session in Hyderabad: 1. New gTLDs a) General process/timing: https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/9715 https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/9725 b) PICs https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/9783 https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/6561 https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/6591 <https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/6591> <https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/6591> ( 2. Diversity ) 3. CCT Review Recent statements about the general consumer trust, consumer choice, competition topic related to the new gTLDs https://community.icann.org/x/MASbAw https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/9867 https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/9745 1. Implementation of new Bylaws https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/9797 <https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/9797> In Hyderabad, I'll bring up to date information on ALAC thinking on these topics from its sessions that precede our joint meeting. Any comments on the draft description on the work of the ALAC/GAC Liaison? Best, Yrjö

1 0

Fwd: [ccnso-council] CWG-UCTN: Progress Report and Draft Interim Report on use of country and territory names as TLDs now available.
by Maureen Hilyard Oct. 26, 2016

Oct. 26, 2016

FYI ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Joke Braeken <joke.braeken(a)icann.org> Date: Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:26 AM Dear All, *CWG-UCTN: Progress Report and Draft Interim Report on use of country and territory names as TLDs now available.* In preparation of the Hyderabad meeting, the Cross-Community Working Group on the Use of Country and Territory Names as TLDs (CWG-UCTN: https://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/ccwg-unct.htm ) has prepared two reports: a Progress report <https://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/ccwg-ctn-progress-25oct16-en.pdf> and its draft Interim report <https://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/ccwg-ctn-draft-interim-report-25oct16…>. Based on the discussions to date, community input and the discussions in Helsinki (ICANN55), the Working Group concluded that for various reasons a harmonised framework for the use of country, territory and other geographic names is not feasible. The CWG will discuss further steps at its f-2-f meeting in Hyderabad <http://sched.co/8czS>. The aforementioned announcement has just been posted on the ccNSO website: https://ccnso.icann.org/announcements/announcement-26oct16-en.htm Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ http://ccnso.icann.org

1 0