- Gnso-improvem-impl-sc - lists.icann.org

FW: Request to the SCI - Vote switching
by Aikman-Scalese, Anne Feb. 27, 2015

Feb. 27, 2015

Dear SCI members, Below is a written request to SCI from a member of the Business Constituency Charter Review Team. I am wondering whether this request must come officially from the BC in order to be considered by SCI. Separately, in the Singapore meeting, after delivery of the SCI report, Avri volunteered to draft a template for GNSO requests to SCI and to prepare drafts for Council of the two “immediate issue” requests mentioned in the SCI report, that is (1) friendly amendments to motions and (2) whether or not resubmitted motions are eligible for waiver of the ten day advance notice for motions. I understand that Avri will be reviewing draft language for these requests with the Council. It may make sense for us to see a draft and provide some comments, but that is up to Avri. So the questions for staff are: 1. Do I need to tell Martin Sutton (see note below) that the request must be submitted by the BC itself? 2. Where do the “friendly amendment” and “applicability of 10 day waiver to resubmitted motions” action items from the GNSO Council meeting in Singapore stand at this time? Thank you, Anne [cid:image001.gif@01D051C9.7FCF9010] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman(a)LRRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman@LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/> From: martinsutton(a)hsbc.com [mailto:martinsutton@hsbc.com] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 12:30 PM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne Subject: Request to the SCI - Vote switching Dear Anne, I am a member of the Business Constituency and currently working with the BC Charter Review team. During our recent discussions, we identified a potential issue that may affect GNSO Stakeholder Groups (SGs) and Constituencies (Cs) which may warrant the attention of the SCI, which I understand you currently chair. With the introduction of New gTLDs, an increasing number of organisations now meet the criteria of membership within multiple groups, even across the contracting and non-contracting parties divide. The point in question is in relation to the ability for a member of multiple SGs and Cs to regularly switch their voting rights between these groups in a tactical manner, so as to apply votes for elections/decisions where they may have concerns with lack of representation within a specific group, at a specific time. Whilst they may only vote in one of the SGs or Cs, there is no restriction as to when and how frequently they may switch their voting power between these groups. This could be too flexible and potentially allow the system to be exploited. I am pleased to say that there is no evidence that this is occurring but as new members continue to increase, it seems sensible to consider preventative measures be put in place to protect the GNSO for the future. As an example, a multi-member organisation could be obliged to commit holding it's voting rights within one group for a minimum term of 12 months before switching to another group. Of course, this would need to be uniform across all of the SGs and Cs, hence, we think it is appropriate to raise this issue with the SCI for consideration. I would be happy to discuss further and interested to know if you feel this would be appropriate and worthwhile for the SCI to assess. Kind regards, Martin Martin C SUTTON Manager, Group Fraud Risk & Intelligence Global Security & Fraud Risk Level 8,1 Canada Square,Canary Wharf,London,E14 5AB,United Kingdom __________________________________________________________________ Phone +44 (0)207 991 8074 Mobile +44 (0)777 4556680 Email martinsutton(a)hsbc.com<mailto:martinsutton@hsbc.com> Website www.hsbc.com<http://www.hsbc.com/> __________________________________________________________________ Protect our environment - please only print this if you have to! ________________________________ ----------------------------------------- SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT! This E-mail is confidential. It may also be legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose or use any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please delete it and all copies from your system and notify the sender immediately by return E-mail. Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely secure, error or virus-free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

4 10

GNSO Review - Westlake Slides from Singapore Session
by Aikman-Scalese, Anne Feb. 11, 2015

Feb. 11, 2015

Dear SCI Members, Attached for your information please see the slides just presented by Westlake at ICANN 52 in the GNSO Review working party session in Singapore. Best regards, Anne [cid:image001.gif@01D04576.9C39B730] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman(a)LRRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman@LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/> ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

1 0

FW: SCI Report to the GNSO Singapore February 2015 PowerPoint.PPTX
by Aikman-Scalese, Anne Feb. 9, 2015

Feb. 9, 2015

Dear SCI members, Staff made some formatting changes to the SCI slides. I added a picture on the front page since I will not be in the room in Singapore. Attached is the final version - no change from the previous version sent to you except format and picture. Hope you have a wonderful ICANN 52! Anne [cid:image001.gif@01D04169.6AF3D2C0] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman(a)LRRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman@LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/> 8 U.S.C. §2510-2521. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

1 1

SCI Chair's Report to Council
by Aikman-Scalese, Anne Feb. 6, 2015

Feb. 6, 2015

Dear SCI members, please provide your informal responses to the two questions below by 20:00 UTC on Thursday February 4. Lori and I are finalizing the Chair's report to Council. Staff has prepared some draft slides for this purpose and we will be making minor edits. For purposes of completing these edits, it would be helpful for each member to weigh in on the two questions below. (Please note this is an informal inquiry - not a formal Consensus Call since these topics do not involve a formal SCI recommendation to Council.) 1. In connection with the question of establishing a procedure for friendly amendments in the Council Operating Procedures, should SCI undertake this work? 2. In connection with the question of considering the application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmission of motions in the Operating Procedures, should SCI undertake this work? With respect to Question 1, I have not heard any disagreement or objection in the January 20 call or on the list, but Mary Wong is very concerned that only three people have provided comment and feels it is quite important for SCI to have the results of a "straw poll" on the topic of friendly amendments. With respect to Topic 2, I understand that both Greg and Amr believe this topic should be addressed, but Avri does not. Again, there is concern that comment from three SCI members is incomplete. Regarding other topics discussed in the January call and on the list since that time, I believe it is clear that those topics come under the "periodic review" element in our Charter and require at a minimum (1) Review and discussion of the Westlake Report and (2) formulation of a proposed plan under the SCI's "periodic review" responsibilities as to which we will need formal consensus for the purpose of making a recommendation to Council. I would like to suggest that SCI work toward adopting such a "periodic review" recommendation under its Charter in time for the Buenos Aires meeting but realize that others may have different thoughts. This can be explored further in future calls. Thank you, Anne [cid:image001.gif@01D03F6D.6B431D10] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman(a)LRRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman@LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/> From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:07 AM To: 'Julie Hedlund'; 'Avri Doria'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc(a)icann.org Cc: Glen de Saint Géry Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan Robinson Thanks Julie. I will work with Lori on this as we hear further thoughts on the list. Anne [cid:image001.gif@01D03F6D.6B431D10] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman(a)LRRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman@LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/> From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 9:17 AM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Avri Doria'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Cc: Glen de Saint Géry Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan Robinson Anne, I can assist by preparing a couple of slides. I can look back at your message, but ideally the slides should just have very brief bullet points. If you and Lori have some brief points that you would like to send me separately in an email I can incorporate these into slides in the template we are using for Singapore presentations. Best regards, Julie From: <Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <AAikman(a)lrrlaw.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrlaw.com>> Date: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:01 AM To: 'Avri Doria' <avri(a)acm.org<mailto:avri@acm.org>>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org>" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org>> Cc: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen(a)icann.org<mailto:Glen@icann.org>> Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan Robinson Hi Avri, Lori and I will schedule the SCI Chair's Report for the first ten minutes of the time with Council. (Lori, I will come to you off list regarding this.) Thanks to staff for pointing out that the SCI Chair must report at each ICANN public meeting. Many thanks Avri for your thorough and sincere explanation of your thinking on the best SCI working method. This deserves further discussion as to our working process in the next SCI call. I honestly don't think there were any inconsistent positions taken and again the mp3 may assist on that point. Have you had time to listen to it or to read the transcript? Regarding the remainder of your observations, I will come back later today with some further thoughts for discussion on the points you have made. Have a great day in all respects and thank you for your active contributions to the list. Anne ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

8 10

CWG-IANA Update: Discussion Document for ICANN52 Singapore
by Aikman-Scalese, Anne Feb. 5, 2015

Feb. 5, 2015

Dear SCI Members, We may all want to be aware of the work of the CWG-IANA on Stewardship of Naming Related functions. The attached document outlines 4 proposals currently under discussion. These include a proposal with a Trust outside of ICANN holding IANA operation rights, a proposal with ICANN holding IANA operation rights in trust, and a proposal where ICANN's bylaws have been sufficiently amended to provide necessary accountability measures to the community. The timeline for this CWG work has also been revised and is attached. Safe travels to Singapore for those who are traveling! Anne [cid:image001.gif@01D0414E.462BBB30] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman(a)LRRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman@LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/> ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

1 0

Travel Delay
by Amr Elsadr Feb. 5, 2015

Feb. 5, 2015

Hi, My flight leaving from Tromsø was postponed several times today, then cancelled altogether. I’ve been in touch with BCD Travel, and I should have a new ticket issued soon, but I was told that I wouldn’t be able to make it to Singapore until Saturday evening. I guess I’ll miss the Saturday sessions. I’m not too happy about it, but there doesn’t seem to be much that can be done at this time. Just thought I should let you all know. Hope all of your flights are safe and comfy. Thanks. Amr

2 2

Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan Robinson
by Angie Graves Jan. 29, 2015

Jan. 29, 2015

Dear Anne, I agree with your revised letter to Jonathan. Thank you for your time on this. Angie On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Lori Schulman <lori.schulman(a)ascd.org> wrote: > Dear Anne, > > > > Thank you for the concise run down of events and positions. I agree with > your proposal on how to proceed with the report and the request for > direction. > > > > Lori > > > > > > > > *Lori S. Schulman* · General Counsel > 1703 North Beauregard Street > > Alexandria, VA 22311-1714 > > P 703-575-5678 · Lori.Schulman(a)ascd.org > [image: cid:image001.png@01CC81E2.512C46F0] > > > > > > *From:* owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc(a)icann.org [mailto: > owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc(a)icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Aikman-Scalese, Anne > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 27, 2015 3:00 PM > *To:* 'Julie Hedlund'; 'Avri Doria'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc(a)icann.org > *Cc:* Thomas Rickert; Wolf-Ulrich Knoben; Glen de Saint Géry > *Subject:* RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair > Jonathan Robinson > > > > To all SCI members and to Staff, > > To be clear, I am certainly not against Avri delivering a report on SCI > work in Singapore and will certainly try to participate remotely. I think > this report should note the following: > > 1. In its call of January 20 and on the list thereafter, SCI > considered the subjects of (1) friendly amendments, (2) effect of 10 day > waiver rule on resubmission of motions, (3) review of WG Consensus > Guidelines, and (4) overall review of procedures and guidelines under the > “periodic review” responsibility delineated in the Charter. > > 2. We believed after our call on January 20 that consensus was > obtained and did not schedule another call at that time. It was thought we > could simply “tweak” the draft letter to Council that was presented prior > to the January 20 call. There was no disagreement expressed on the call > about the basic points to be covered in the letter. > > 3. It later became apparent that Avri, who was unable to attend the > January 20 call, disagreed with mentioning at least two of the suggested > topics – 10 day waiver rule and review of WG Consensus Guidelines. Amr > also disagreed with the statement that SCI had not directly considered this > issue. > > 4. The Chair modified the letter to remove the two sources of > objection listed in 3. and asked for further input. Staff suggested > further modifications which were sent to the list. The Chair disagreed > with staff’s modifications and the liaison mostly agreed with them but no > other SCI members weighed in. > > 5. Only three SCI members responded positively to the invitation to > another call for January 27 to resolve the issues. Thus, the call was > cancelled and no consensus was reached on the letter to Council. > > As Chair, I would boil the outstanding substantive disagreement regarding > the letter as expressed on the list down to two points: > > > > 1. Although there was no specific disagreement expressly voiced by > any SCI member during the January 20 call with respect to bringing up the > topic of friendly amendments, staff recommended that a straw poll be > conducted to determine if this was really what SCI wanted to say given that > Council had put this issue on hold. In my view, Avri should simply ask > Council whether they still feel this issue needs to be on hold or whether > SCI can help address it (not increasing the workload of Council, but > actually helping to reduce that workload.) > > > > 2. Everyone on SCI agrees that with respect to “periodic review”, > the results of the GNSO Review are quite relevant. Staff apparently takes > the position that SCI should do nothing until GNSO directs its “periodic > review” work plan after seeing the final results of GNSO Review. The > Council Liaison appears to agree with this approach. The SCI Chair > believes that after the meeting in Singapore, SCI should (a)review the > results of the Westlake Report and schedule calls to begin work on a > clearly delineated proposed plan (with timelines) under the periodic review > responsibility contained in the Charter and should not sit idle while GNSO > reviews the final recommendations. > > > > 3. Thus, my proposal for the request for direction from Council to > be made in the course of the delivery of Avri’s report is as follows: > > (a) under the “immediate review” responsibility in the Charter, should > SCI study the “friendly amendments” issue that was put “on hold” by Council > in its January 15 meeting or wait for further deliberations by Council on > this issue? > > (b) Should SCI members read the Westlake Report when it comes out and > begin work on a proposed periodic review plan to be submitted to Council > for approval or do nothing regarding a proposed plan for periodic review > until further direction from Council? > > The SCI Chair observes that staff is quite appropriately concerned about > the Council (and corresponding staff) workload, but respectfully suggests > that the work to be done is on the part of SCI, not Council, and that SCI > should not sit idle during the IANA transition since its work forms a > positive aspect of ICANN accountability. > > > > Thanks to all for their thoughts by reply to all. Obviously if GNSO > Council directs SCI to sit idle and do nothing pending the final > recommendations from GNSO Review, that means we have nothing to do until > further direction is received from Council. We will count on Avri to tell > us after the meeting in Singapore whether we have anything to do or not. > > Anne > > > > *Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel* > > *Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | * > > *One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611* > > *(T) 520.629.4428 <520.629.4428> | (F) 520.879.4725 <520.879.4725>* > > *AAikman(a)LRRLaw.com <AAikman(a)LRRLaw.com>** | www.LRRLaw.com > <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>* > > > > > > > > *From:* Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org > <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>] > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:46 AM > *To:* Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Avri Doria'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc(a)icann.org > *Cc:* Thomas Rickert; Wolf-Ulrich Knoben; Glen de Saint Géry > *Subject:* Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair > Jonathan Robinson > > > > Anne, > > > > Staff notes the following from the SCI Charter: > > > > *"Reporting* > > At a minimum at every public ICANN meeting, the SCI Chair shall provide > the GNSO Council with an update concerning: > > - The issues dealt with and related status > - Recommendations expected to be submitted to the GNSO Council > - An activity timeline" > > Thus, a report is a requirement in the Charter. > > > > Best regards, > > Julie > > > > Julie Hedlund, Policy Director > > Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. > > > ------------------------------ > > > This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the > individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this > message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or > agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended > recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you > have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by > replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any > attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and > confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the > Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. > > This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of > > the person(s) to whom it has been sent, and may contain information that is > > confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient or > > have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy, > distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please notify the > sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message and any > > attachments. ASCD makes no guarantee that this e-mail is error or virus free. > >

7 16

SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan Robinson
by Aikman-Scalese, Anne Jan. 28, 2015

Jan. 28, 2015

Dear all, Please see attached the revised letter to GNSO Council based on Tuesday's SCI conference call. If you have any comments, please supply them to the list prior to 1300 UTC Monday, January 26. Avri, again, as Council liaison for SCI, we are requesting 15 minutes on the schedule for Working Sessions in Singapore for you to present this letter to Council. (I am unable to attend and SCI will not be meeting separately there.) Thank you, Anne [cid:image001.gif@01D0363B.F7BC5670] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman(a)LRRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman@LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/> From: Thomas Rickert [mailto:rickert@anwaelte.de] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 2:32 AM To: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben Cc: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; Lori Schulman; Julie Hedlund; gnso-improvem-impl-sc(a)icann.org; Glen de Saint Géry Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] NCPH Intersessional 2015 Recordings & Transcripts Same here. Sorry! Best Thomas Am 21.01.2015 um 09:44 schrieb WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>>: Sorry all that I missed the call! I came back late after the Frankfurt meeting. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne<mailto:AAikman@lrrlaw.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 10:16 PM To: 'Lori Schulman'<mailto:lori.schulman@ascd.org> ; Julie Hedlund<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org> ; gnso-improvem-impl-sc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Cc: 'Glen de Saint Géry'<mailto:Glen@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: NCPH Intersessional 2015 Recordings & Transcripts Many thanks Lori. We will revise the draft letter to GNSO Council in accordance with comments received during today's meeting. Separately, and specifically directed at Avri as Council liaison, staff advised today that certain SCI matters were put "on hold" last week by Council. (Thanks Mary for this info.) Staff also advised that it is part of the function of Council liaison to provide SCI with information as to action taken by Council affecting its work. Amr mentioned that GNSO Council meeting minutes are not available until the next GNSO Council meeting and as such, may not be timely. Thanks everyone who participated in today's call. We will be circulating the redraft of the letter soon. We want to be sure our letter and request for time on the Council's work schedule for Singapore reaches Council in a timely fashion and preferably well before February 1. Anne <image002.gif> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman(a)LRRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman@LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/> From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc(a)icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org] On Behalf Of Lori Schulman Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:11 PM To: Julie Hedlund; gnso-improvem-impl-sc(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] NCPH Intersessional 2015 Recordings & Transcripts Dear All, Below is the link for last week's intersessional. I didn't find the joint letter re GNSO review posted separately. https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=51416553 Lori Lori S. Schulman · General Counsel 1703 North Beauregard Street Alexandria, VA 22311-1714 P 703-575-5678 · Lori.Schulman(a)ascd.org<mailto:Lori.Schulman@ascd.org> <image003.jpg> This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the person(s) to whom it has been sent, and may contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy, distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message and any attachments. ASCD makes no guarantee that this e-mail is error or virus free. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

9 29

RSVPs for Tomorrow's Call so Far
by Julie Hedlund Jan. 27, 2015

Jan. 27, 2015

Anne, Per the Secretariat here are the RSVPs so far: Confirmed: Registrar Stakeholder Group: Jennifer Standiford, Primary Intellectual Property Constituency: Anne-Aikman Scalese, Primary/Chair Non-Commercial Users Constituency: Amr Elsadr, Primary Apologies: Business Constituency: Ron Andruff, Primary Intellectual Property Constituency: Greg Shatan, Alternate Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group: Avri Doria, Primary Nominating Committee Appointee: Thomas Rickert, Secondary NPOC Constituency, Lori Schulman, Primary/Vice Chair I have included below the full list of members for reference. We have, thus far, heard from 8 of 16 members. We currently have confirmed attendance from 3 of 16, or less than half and only 3 groups. The GNSO Working Group Guidelines do not define a quorum, yet it would seem that we would need more than 3 SCI members. I suggest we wait until early tomorrow morning to see if there are further responses, and perhaps this email will reminder members who have not responded. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Director, SSAC Support Stakeholder Group / Constituency Primary Member Alternate Member Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG)Jennifer Standiford - Jennifer Standiford SOI <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Jennifer+Standiford+SOI> TBD Registry Stakeholder Group (RySG)Ray Fassett - Ray Fassett SOI <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Ray+Fassett+SOI> TBD Business Constituency (BC)Ron Andruff (Chair 2014) - Ron Andruff SOI <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Ron+Andruff+SOI> Angie Graves - Angie Graves SOI <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Angie+Graves+SOI> ISPs and connectivity providers Constituency (ISPCP)Wolf-Ulrich Knoben - Wolf-Ulrich Knoben SOI <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Wolf-Ulrich+Knoben+SOI> Osvaldo Novoa - Osvaldo Novoa SOI <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Osvaldo+Novoa+SOI> Intellectual Property ConstituencyAnne E. Aikman-Scalese (Chair 2015) - Anne Aikman-Scalese SOI <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Anne+Aikman-Scalese+SOI> Gregory Shatan - Gregory S. Shatan SOI <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Gregory+S.+Shatan+SOI> Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG)Avri Doria - Avri Doria SOI <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Avri+Doria+SOI> Stefania Milan - Stefania Milan SOI <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Stefania+Milan+SOI> Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC)Amr Elsadr- Amr Elsadr SOI <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Amr+Elsadr+SOI> David Cake - David Cake SOI <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/David+Cake+SOI> Nominating Committee AppointeeJennifer Wolfe - Jennifer Wolfe SOI <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Jennifer+Wolfe+SOI> Thomas Rickert - Thomas Rickert SOI <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Thomas+Rickert+SOI> Not-for-Profit Organizations Constituency - NPOC ConstituencyLori Schulman (Vice-Chair 2015) - Lori S. Schulman SOI <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Lori+S.+Schulman+SOI> Cintra Sooknanan (Vice-Chair 2014) - Cintra Sooknanan SOI <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Cintra+Sooknanan+SOI>

1 1

NCPH Intersessional 2015 Recordings & Transcripts
by Lori Schulman Jan. 21, 2015

Jan. 21, 2015

Dear All, Below is the link for last week's intersessional. I didn't find the joint letter re GNSO review posted separately. https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=51416553 Lori Lori S. Schulman * General Counsel 1703 North Beauregard Street Alexandria, VA 22311-1714 P 703-575-5678 * Lori.Schulman(a)ascd.org<mailto:Lori.Schulman@ascd.org> [cid:image001.png@01CC81E2.512C46F0] This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the person(s) to whom it has been sent, and may contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy, distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message and any attachments. ASCD makes no guarantee that this e-mail is error or virus free.

4 4