October 2015 - Accountability-Cross-Community

Fw: Welcome to Introduction To Contractual Compliance
by Ron Baione Oct. 25, 2015

Oct. 25, 2015

1 0

Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Welcome to Introduction To Contractual Compliance
by Ron Baione Oct. 25, 2015

Oct. 25, 2015

1. oh.. so you are aware of the jeff.dunn(a)icann.org issue, maybe if there was confusion about your email address you could have mentioned that as a known possibility of confusion to clear up any confusion. 2. What were the last four versions of ios ? Ron

1 0

Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Welcome to Introduction To Contractual Compliance
by Ron Baione Oct. 25, 2015

Oct. 25, 2015

1. oh.. so you are aware of the jeff.dunn(a)icann.org issue, maybe if there was confusion about your email address you could have mentioned that as a known possibility of confusion to clear up any confusion. 2. What were the last four versions of ios ? Ron

1 0

Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Welcome to Introduction To Contractual Compliance
by Ron Baione Oct. 25, 2015

Oct. 25, 2015

1. Are you aware that the system replies with the email "jeff.dunn(a)icann.org" (a non-existent email) and (then it says "donotreply(a)blackboard.com") after registering for a course. 2. Is ICANN learn compatible with the first ipad, have you tested the first ipad with icann learn courses. Ron

1 0

Fw: Welcome to Introduction To Contractual Compliance
by Ron Baione Oct. 25, 2015

Oct. 25, 2015

Each time I signed up for a course on the old system, i got a response from jeff.dunn(a)icann.org (see email below), are you not aware of that email address? Is the new system compatible with Ipad 5.2? I try to open a course in the new system, and it turns blue and nothing opens up. What are the compatibility requirements? Best RBD

1 0

Fw: Welcome to Introduction To Contractual Compliance
by Ron Baione Oct. 25, 2015

Oct. 25, 2015

Each time I signed up for a course on the old system, i got a response from jeff.dunn(a)icann.org (see email below), are you not aware of that email address? Is the new system compatible with Ipad 5.2? I try to open a course in the new system, and it turns blue and nothing opens up. What are the compatibility requirements? Best RBD

1 0

Icann Learn
by Ron Baione Oct. 25, 2015

Oct. 25, 2015

Resending to correct spelling error and to delete unwanting recipients of previous email: Anyone talk to jeff dunn yet about why icann learn courses don't open? His icann email doesnt exist. Ron

1 0

Re: [CCWG-ACCT] FW: Email Lists / SOI s
by Phil Buckingham Oct. 25, 2015

Oct. 25, 2015

Dear Co- chairs, I fully support Roelof s request, with the addition that all SOIs should be reviewed and attendance monitored. Can I make a further suggestion, as we move full steam ahead to Marrakesh. Would it possible to create separate accountability-cross-community(a)icann.org /// emails to the list based on separate threads/ topics. Would the ICANN Female Quartet ( Alice,Hilary, Grace and Brenda) be able to coordinate. As Roelof says we all have day jobs ( that pays for ICANN volunteering). I personally simply do not have the time to read emails to which I have no expertise, no professional knowledge. Regards, Phil Phil Buckingham CEO, Dot Advice Limited From: accountability-cross-community-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Roelof Meijer Sent: 25 October 2015 16:51 To: Mathieu Weill; Thomas Rickert; León Felipe Sánchez Ambía Cc: accountability-cross-community(a)icann.org Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] FW: Fw: [At-Large] (no subject) Dear co-chairs, I herewith formally request you to consider revoking mr. Ron Baione's (example email below) access to and entry on the CCWG email list(s). As arguments supporting this request I submit that: * The nearly 80 emails mr. Baione sent to this list only this month, lack both subject (as of late) and content in almost all cases. Theypre cost other subscribers to the list precious time and bring us (and the community) nothing; * Mr. Baiones Statement of Interest states very little in general and and is quite unclear about his interests in particular. @ my fellow CCWG members and participants: please feel free to support or object to this request. Best regards, Roelof A. Meijer CEO SIDN | Meander 501 | 6825 MD | P.O. Box 5022 | 6802 EA | ARNHEM | THE NETHERLANDS T +31 (0)26 352 55 00 | M +31 (0)6 11 395 775 | F +31 (0)26 352 55 05 roelof.meijer(a)sidn.nl | <http://www.sidn.nl/> www.sidn.nl From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Ron Baione via Accountability-Cross-Community <accountability-cross-community(a)icann.org> Reply-To: Ron Baione <ron.baione(a)yahoo.com> Date: zaterdag 24 oktober 2015 17:09 To: "Salaets, Ken" <ksalaets(a)itic.org>, Keith Drazek <kdrazek(a)verisign.com> Cc: "accountability-cross-community(a)icann.org" <accountability-cross-community(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Fw: [At-Large] (no subject) Is anyone aware of when the next Winston Churchill trivia session will be? Is that a weekly thing? Monthly? Just trying to blend in to the hard work process that is strictly adhered to, it seems. Ron _____ From: Salaets, Ken <ksalaets(a)itic.org>; To: Drazek, Keith <kdrazek(a)verisign.com>; Cc: accountability-cross-community(a)icann.org <accountability-cross-community(a)icann.org>; Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Fw: [At-Large] (no subject) Sent: Sat, Oct 24, 2015 4:02:11 PM +1. On Oct 24, 2015, at 5:25 PM, Drazek, Keith <kdrazek(a)verisign.com <javascript:return> > wrote: I suggest we ALL try to limit personal back-and-forth email on this global list. We have enough real work to do without distractions. Regards, Keith On Oct 24, 2015, at 4:21 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc(a)gmail.com <javascript:return> > wrote: Not quite sure what you are trying to say, but I would be glad to ask the list to comment on the relative value of your contributions to my emails, meeting contributions, Working Party contributions and drafting contributions over the last 10+ months. As you say, it's all relative. On Saturday, October 24, 2015, Ron Baione <ron.baione(a)yahoo.com <javascript:return> > wrote: The email sought was not found in the archives. The point I was making is that there was no email alerting the community to a known IT problem, nor will there be. The quality of anyone's contributions is relative to the person reading them, as this is an open and inclusive process, and lastly, the quality of your contributions have helped lead ICANN to the success it is today. Best, Ron This is a publicly archived email list. You have the same access to the prior emails as every other participant. I suggest you start reading from the beginning of the list and work your way forward until you have caught up with the group. You should find the email you seek in the process. This will likely have the effect of improving the quality of your contributions as well. On Friday, October 23, 2015, Ron Baione <ron.baione(a)yahoo.com> wrote: The bounceback/spam IT Issue the email lists have been having was a known issue to the office of the ICANN IT director since Yahoo changed its spam filter to DMARC. The information in this email chain (below) was not provided to me when I signed up as a participant to ccwg-accountability. The patch to fix the issue was available in August (read conversation below). If anyone can provide me an email from August 2015 or before, from the IT director or IT Staff, which instructs the members, participants and observers of this or any mailing list that a patch or fix to the mailing list bounceback/spam issue would be tested and implemented, kindly forward that email to me. Ron _____ From: David Closson <david.closson(a)icann.org>; To: Ron Baione <ron.baione(a)yahoo.com>; Cc: Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee(a)gmail.com>; Subject: Re: [At-Large] (no subject) Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 7:01:08 PM Yes, we first started experiencing the problem back when http://yahoo.com changed their DMARC policy to a strict reject. We didnt have many http://yahoo.com senders on our lists surprisingly so the problem wasnt a huge deal. We were waiting on a vendor back port patch (CentOS via Redhat) to help with header munging for senders with strict reject DMARC policies. The back port patch was ready back in August but we didnt have time to fully test. We have completed testing as of this morning and plan schedule the change for this weekend. The change will be almost transparent with exception to senders from domains with strict reject DMARC policies. In this case, the from: will be replaced with the list address and we will insert a reply-to: header with the senders address. Our testing indicates this is working flawlessly with the vendor patch. -- David Closson Director of IT Operations, ICANN 12025 Waterfront Dr. Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 Office: +1-310-578-8670 Cell: +1-213-270-3866 -- From: Ron Baione <ron.baione(a)yahoo.com> Date: Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 7:15 PM To: "david.closson" <david.closson(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [At-Large] (no subject) Thanks David, any way you can provide when the DMARC email issue was initially brought to your attention? For example, has the referenced upgrade been in the works for a few months or is this something that occurred just within the last few weeks/days? Ron _____ From: David Closson <david.closson(a)icann.org>; To: Ron Baione <ron.baione(a)yahoo.com>; Subject: Re: [At-Large] (no subject) Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 12:38:48 AM Greetings Ron, We are testing the version upgrade now in our test environment but need about a week before the actual production upgrade. - David Closson Director of IT Operations, ICANN 12025 Waterfront Dr. Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 Office: +1-310-578-8670 Cell: +1-213-270-3866 -- From: Ron Baione <ron.baione(a)yahoo.com> Date: Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 12:51 PM To: "david.closson" <david.closson(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [At-Large] (no subject) David, If possible, provide the date or time-frame that the ICANN system upgrade for DMARC related emails was planned for or ordered by your office. Ron _____ From: David Closson <david.closson(a)icann.org>; To: John R. Levine <johnl(a)iecc.com>; Cc: at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>; Subject: Re: [At-Large] (no subject) Sent: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 6:26:30 PM Thanks John. We can discuss off-list if you would like. Yes, I was attempting to avoid an email discussion regarding DMARC but we already have a upgrade planned to our mailman system since some DMARC support is a necessity moving forward. -- David Closson Director of IT Operations, ICANN 12025 Waterfront Dr. Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 Office: +1-310-578-8670 Cell: +1-213-270-3866 -- -----Original Message----- From: "John R. Levine" <johnl(a)iecc.com> Date: Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 10:54 AM To: "david.closson" <david.closson(a)icann.org> Cc: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com>, "at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [At-Large] (no subject) >> We are working to provide a solution to this problem as quickly as possible. >> We will update Valentina Pavel (ICANN IT support case holder) who can in turn advise the Atlarge stakeholders. > >It's actually called DMARC, and I can report there is some work in >progress to fix it at the group that caused the DMARC problems in the >first place. > >R's, >John _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community(a)icann.org <javascript:return> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community(a)icann.org <javascript:return> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

5 7

Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Failure Notice
by Ron Baione Oct. 25, 2015

Oct. 25, 2015

"If you are having trouble using the lists, please contact mailman(a)icann.org." https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo mailman(a)icann.org is not a known email address.

1 0

Meeting location
by Grace Abuhamad Oct. 25, 2015

Oct. 25, 2015

Dear all, For those who are attending in person, the CCWG meeting will take place in Liffey Hall on the 1st floor on the convention center. I sent information about the shuttles to/from the hotel in a prior email <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2015-October/0 06773.html> . For those attending remotely, please join us via the virtual meeting room at: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/dub54-liffeyhall2/ As a reminder, all ICANN meetings (including the chat rooms and mailing lists) follow ICANN¹s Expected Standards of Behavior. For reference these are located here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-standards-2012-05-15-en. In the words of the ICANN Ombudsman from a note he sent to this list on 22 June: "May I implore participants to continue to note the ICANN policy on polite discourse. It is important to have a strong and vigorous debate but we don't need to make personal attacks on each other. A polite note of disagreement should be sufficient, and has been frequently used. But if we start to attack individuals on list, this will distract us from the real tasks.² Looking forward to seeing you in 8 hours, Grace

6 8