- ALAC-Announce - lists.icann.org

VOTE RESULTS: ALAC Ratification of the R3 Paper
by ICANN At-Large Staff Oct. 1, 2012

Oct. 1, 2012

Dear All, With 15 out of 15 ALAC Members having voted on the "R3 Paper<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/34603268/R3+Paper+-+FINAL.…>" we can confirm that the result is quorate. ***** Question: Do you support the ratification of the "R3 Paper<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/34603268/R3+Paper+-+FINAL.…>" for communication to the relevant parties? ALAC Ratification of the R3 Paper As at Poll close: Thursday 27 September 2012 23:59 UTC Number of voters: 15 · Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 100.00 Ranked by votes Rank Options Votes % Voters 1 Yes 15 100.00 Carlton Samuels, Eduardo Diaz, Natalia Enciso, Jean-Jacques Subrenat, Sandra Hoferichter, Evan Leibovitch, Edmon Chung, Sergio Salinas Porto, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Tijani Ben Jemaa, Yaovi Atohoun, Ganesh Kumar, Rinalia Abdul Rahim, Titi Akinsanmi, Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro 2 No 0 0.00 2 Abstain 0 0.00 ***** We can confirm that the following members did not participate in this vote: n/a For those that have abstained, would you like to provide an explanation of why you abstained? n/a You may review the results independently under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=266544JpNEjLCs6mtiCNLRW7 All closed ALAC votes may be reviewed under: https://www.bigpulse.com/m7097/ Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie Peregrine ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<https://owa.icann.org/owa/redir.aspx?C=244359801b584fbdab51dbe33f605d32&URL…>

1 0

VOTE RESULTS: (168) Computer Society of India
by ICANN At-Large Staff Oct. 1, 2012

Oct. 1, 2012

Dear All, With 14 out of 15 ALAC Members having voted in the recent vote on the ALS application from (168) Computer Society of India, we can confirm that both result is quorate. ******** ALS Applications: (168) Computer Society of India As at Poll close: Friday 28 September 2012 23:59 UTC Number of voters: 14 · Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 93.33 Ranked by votes Rank Options Votes % Voters 1 Yes 14 100.00 Carlton Samuels, Eduardo Diaz, Natalia Enciso, Jean-Jacques Subrenat, Sandra Hoferichter, Evan Leibovitch, Edmon Chung, Sergio Salinas Porto, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Tijani Ben Jemaa, Yaovi Atohoun, Ganesh Kumar, Rinalia Abdul Rahim, Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro 2 No 0 0.00 2 Abstain 0 0.00 ******** You may verify the results independently under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=2664qhthwkG7tmAfnDu4Gm5e We can confirm that the following ALAC members did not participate in the balloting: Titi Akinsanmi You can find all the results of closed ALAC votes under: https://www.bigpulse.com/m7097 -- Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie Peregrine ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Website: www.atlarge.icann.org

1 0

CALL FOR COMMENTS: Global Partnerships
by ICANN At-Large Staff Sept. 26, 2012

Sept. 26, 2012

Dear All, The <https://community.icann.org/x/1a7bAQ> <https://community.icann.org/x/hxAQAg> <https://community.icann.org/x/fBAQAg> <https://community.icann.org/x/XhAQAg> At-Large Global Partnership Questions for Toronto Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/XhAQAg> has been created. Please note that this workspace will be used to gather the At-Large's questions for the Global Partnerships Department during the Toronto Meeting. These questions will be asked to the Regional VPs during the Outreach SC meeting. The deadline for comments is 19-September-2012 at 23:59 UTC. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie Peregrine ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 1

CALL FOR COMMENTS: Public Forum Topic
by ICANN At-Large Staff Sept. 26, 2012

Sept. 26, 2012

Dear All, The <https://community.icann.org/x/1a7bAQ> <https://community.icann.org/x/hxAQAg> <https://community.icann.org/x/fBAQAg> <https://community.icann.org/x/hxAQAg> At-Large Public Forum Topics Toronto Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/dhAQAg> has been created. Please note that this workspace will be used to gather the At-Large's topics for the Public Forum during the Toronto Meeting. The deadline for comments is 19-September-2012 at 23:59 UTC. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie Peregrine ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 1

CALL FOR COMMENTS: Communications Department
by ICANN At-Large Staff Sept. 26, 2012

Sept. 26, 2012

Dear All, The <https://community.icann.org/x/1a7bAQ> <https://community.icann.org/x/hxAQAg> <https://community.icann.org/x/fBAQAg> <https://community.icann.org/x/hxAQAg> At-Large Communications Questions for Toronto Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/XBAQAg> has been created. Please note that this workspace will be used to gather the At-Large's questions for the Communication Department during the Toronto Meeting. The deadline for comments is 19-September-2012 at 23:59 UTC. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie Peregrine ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 1

CALL FOR COMMENTS: ICANN Board
by ICANN At-Large Staff Sept. 26, 2012

Sept. 26, 2012

Dear All, The <https://community.icann.org/x/1a7bAQ> <https://community.icann.org/x/hxAQAg> At-Large ICANN Board Questions for Toronto Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/fBAQAg> has been created. Please note that this workspace will be used to gather the At-Large's questions for the ICANN Board during the Toronto Meeting. The deadline for comments is 19-September-2012 at 23:59 UTC. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie Peregrine ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 1

CALL FOR COMMENTS: Compliance Department
by ICANN At-Large Staff Sept. 26, 2012

Sept. 26, 2012

Dear All, The <https://community.icann.org/x/1a7bAQ> <https://community.icann.org/x/hxAQAg> <https://community.icann.org/x/fBAQAg> At-Large Compliance Questions for Toronto Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/hxAQAg> has been created. Please note that this workspace will be used to gather the At-Large's questions for the Compliance Department during the Toronto Meeting. The deadline for comments is 19-September-2012 at 23:59 UTC. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie Peregrine ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 1

Proposed alternative TMCH implementation model
by At-Large Staff Sept. 26, 2012

Sept. 26, 2012

Dear All, Sent on behalf of Jeff Neuman. Thank you. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie Peregrine ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org On 26/09/2012 14:11, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman(a)neustar.us> wrote: >All, > >I wanted to forward this to the Council. Unfortunately the documents >posted by ICANN on the clearinghouse did NOT include any of the materials >and information discussed with the tech group for the past several >months. It is an omission the group has asked ICANN to correct. In the >meantime, these documents are now out for public comment. We have asked >ICANN to open an official ICANN public comment on it as well. > >We, the registries that have worked on this, believe that these alternate >models better reflect the principals in the Applicant Guidebook, while at >the same time presents a solution that is more easily implement able by >the registries to keep the costs down for trademark owners sand >applicants. This was truly developed in a bottom up approach and >represents comments received by the tech group. > >Please forward on to your respective constituencies, advisory committees >and stakeholder groups. > >I am happy to discuss in Toronto and to answer any questions, > >Thanks, > > > >Sent with Good (www.good.com) > > > -----Original Message----- >From: Chris Wright [mailto:chris@ausregistry.com.au] >Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 04:26 AM Eastern Standard Time >To: Chris Wright >Subject: [REGYCON] Proposed alternative TMCH implementation model > >All > > > >As you may be aware, ARI Registry Services in conjunction with Neustar, >Verisign and Demand Media have spent the past three months producing an >alternative solution for the operation of ICANN�s Trademark Clearinghouse >(TMCH) for the new Top-Level Domain (TLD) program. > > > >Today we are publishing the results of this work in the form of three >white papers which outline concerns with ICANN�s current TMCH proposal >and provide an alternative model that addresses those concerns whilst >meeting all the requirements outlined in the Applicant Guidebook and >those further stipulated by ICANN. > > > >Please see the attached documents (or view my blog about the subject >here: >http://www.ariservices.com/blog/community-support-required-for-alternative >-trademark-clearinghouse-solution/) > > > >We are now seeking public feedback, comment and support for this >alternative proposal to demonstrate to ICANN that there is a consensus >for change. I encourage everyone involved or interested in the new TLD >program to review the alternative approach and voice your opinion on the >matter to ICANN. Please help spread the word, I will communicate the >official ICANN link as soon as the documents are posted. > > > >The TMCH is a crucial element of the new TLD program that affects us all >and we cannot afford to get this wrong. > > > >Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions > > > >Thanks > > > > > >Chris Wright > >Chief Technology Officer > > > >ARI REGISTRY SERVICES > >Level 8, 10 Queens Road. Melbourne. Victoria. Australia. 3004. > >P� +61 3 9866 3710� F� +61 3 9866 1970� M� +61 401 873 798 > >E� chris.wright(a)ariservices.com <mailto:chris.wright@ariservices.com> > >ariservices.com <http://ariservices.com/> > > > >ARI Registry Services is an evolution of AusRegistry International. > >Follow us on Twitter <http://twitter.com/#!/ausregistryint> > > > >The information contained in this communication is intended for the named >recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally >privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended >recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action in >reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error, please >delete all copies from your system and notify us immediately. > > > >-- > > >

1 0

Full schedule for the ICANN meetings in Toronto published
by At-Large Staff Sept. 24, 2012

Sept. 24, 2012

Dear All, Please find the full schedule for the ICANN meetings in Toronto published on page: http://toronto45.icann.org/full-schedule Thank you. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie Peregrine ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org

1 0

VOTE RESULTS: ALAC Statement on the SSAC Report on Dotless Domains
by ICANN At-Large Staff Sept. 22, 2012

Sept. 22, 2012

Dear All, With 14 out of 15 ALAC Members having voted on the "ALAC Statement on the SSAC Report on Dotless Domains<https://community.icann.org/x/voUoAg>" we can confirm that the result is quorate. ***** Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement on the SSAC Report on Dotless Domains<https://community.icann.org/x/voUoAg>" for communication to the relevant parties? ALAC Statement on the SSAC Report on Dotless Domains As at Poll close: Friday 21 September 2012 23:59 UTC Number of voters: 14 · Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 93.33 Ranked by votes Rank Options Votes % Voters 1 Yes 13 92.86 Carlton Samuels, Eduardo Diaz, Natalia Enciso, Jean-Jacques Subrenat, Sandra Hoferichter, Evan Leibovitch, Edmon Chung, Sergio Salinas Porto, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Tijani Ben Jemaa, Ganesh Kumar, Rinalia Abdul Rahim, Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro 2 Abstain 1 7.14 Yaovi Atohoun 3 No 0 0.00 ***** We can confirm that the following members did not participate in this vote: Titi Akinsanmi For those that have abstained, would you like to provide an explanation of why you abstained? Yaovi Atohoun You may review the results independently under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=2645T7wbbm7PUmTA5eudS5AS All closed ALAC votes may be reviewed under: https://www.bigpulse.com/m7097/ Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie Peregrine ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<https://owa.icann.org/owa/redir.aspx?C=244359801b584fbdab51dbe33f605d32&URL…>

1 0