April 2018 - ALAC - lists.icann.org

Update on GDPR and FAQs
by León Felipe Sánchez Ambía April 11, 2018

April 11, 2018

Dear all, A blog post with updates on data protection and privacy issues, in relation to GDPR, and some FAQs have been posted by Göran in a new blog post at ICANN’s blog. You can read the post here https://www.icann.org/news/blog/data-protection-privacy-issues-update-an-ic… <https://www.icann.org/news/blog/data-protection-privacy-issues-update-an-ic…> I hope this information is useful for many in this list. Best regards, León

2 1

Fwd: Fwd: [DC] IGF Call for Issues: Shaping the 2018 Agenda
by Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond April 11, 2018

April 11, 2018

Hi everyone, a kind reminder that this Friday is the deadline for the IGF's call for issues. If your RALO has submitted a CROP request for IGF 2018, it should make sure that the issue it wants to base its session on, is addressed at the IGF. Kindest regards, Olivier -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [DC] IGF Call for Issues: Shaping the 2018 Agenda Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:05:03 +0000 From: Eleonora Mazzucchi <eleonora.mazzucchi(a)un.org> To: dc(a)intgovforum.org <dc(a)intgovforum.org>, bp_cybersec_2016(a)intgovforum.org <bp_cybersec_2016(a)intgovforum.org>, bp_gender(a)intgovforum.org <bp_gender(a)intgovforum.org>, bpf-localcontent(a)intgovforum.org <bpf-localcontent(a)intgovforum.org>, outreach_com_2015(a)intgovforum.org <outreach_com_2015(a)intgovforum.org> Dear All, As the IGF starts to shape its programme for the 2018 cycle, we would like to invite *all stakeholders* to participate in a first-ever*call for issues*. We are looking for the community’s suggestions on what *broad Internet governance topics*, and the *issues within those topics,* should be discussed this year. You can let us know what you think by filling out the following form by *Friday April 13, noon UTC*: https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2018-call-for-issues# A *background note* on the call has also been published: http://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/index.php?q=filedepot_download/6037… Please distribute this widely throughout your networks! We look forward to your input. Best regards, the IGF Secretariat Team

1 0

Fwd: [Accred-Model] Is this a listserv?
by Holly Raiche April 10, 2018

April 10, 2018

Folks It looks as if this is the mechanism for consultation on an accreditation model. Clearly,not your normal PDP style consultation, but in the circumstances, I think this seems to be the ad hoc way forward. While we can raise this in other fora, I suspect this will be what we have to watch. I’ll keep watching and letting people know where this is headed. I think my biggest question - is this how ICANN will decide issues in the future/when issues are as urgent as this one? Holly Begin forwarded message: > From: Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org> > Subject: Re: [Accred-Model] Is this a listserv? > Date: 10 April 2018 7:19:50 am AEST > To: "accred-model(a)icann.org" <accred-model(a)icann.org> > > Hello everyone, > > This email is being sent to confirm that this listserv is a publicly-archived mailing list, through which interested community members may continue discussions about developing a workable accreditation and access model. A link to the mailing list archives as well as the recording and relevant transcripts from the Friday call have been included in the “Community Discussions” section of this page on the ICANN website: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/gdpr-legal-analysis-2017-11-17-en#dis…. As noted on that page, please continue to share news of and updates on all community work regarding data protection and privacy issues. > > If you do not wish to remain on this mailing list, or if there are other community members who are interested in signing up, please send an email to admin-accred-model(a)icann.org. > > Thanks and cheers > Mary > > From: Accred-Model <accred-model-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Lori Schulman <lschulman(a)inta.org> > Date: Monday, April 9, 2018 at 02:32 > To: "accred-model(a)icann.org" <accred-model(a)icann.org> > Subject: [Accred-Model] Is this a listserv? > > Hi, > > If this is a list serv, please add me. Thank you. > > Lori > > Lori Schulman > Senior Director, Internet Policy > International Trademark Association > 1250 Connecticut Avenue, Suite 200 > Washington DC, USA > +1-202-704-0408, skype: lsschulman > www.inta.org[inta.org] > > > Find us on: Twitter[twitter.com] LinkedIn[linkedin.com] Facebook[facebook.com] > > > > _______________________________________________ > Accred-Model mailing list > Accred-Model(a)icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accred-model

1 0

ALAC Comment on IPC/BC Accreditation & Access Model for Non-Public Data
by ICANN At-Large Staff April 9, 2018

April 9, 2018

Dear All, This is to let you know that a workspace on the IPC/BC Accreditation & Access Model for Non-Public Data<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=84213851> has now gone live. The wiki workspace for this public comment is https://community.icann.org/x/WwAFBQ. All pertinent resources can also be found there. Kind Regards, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Website: atlarge.icann.org<http://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge<http://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge<http://www.twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> [ignature_692844728]

1 0

ALAC Comment on IPC/BC Access Model
by Holly Raiche April 8, 2018

April 8, 2018

Folks As we said in the ALAC Statement on the GDPR – now being voted upon – one of the outstanding critical issues will be accreditation of those who are given access to personal information from the Whois database. The IPC/BC community within the GNSO has developed a ‘Draft Accreditation and Access Model for non-public Whois Data’ which they are putting forward for discussion. Indeed, they recently held a webinar on the model – at the usually impossible time for Australia. They have also set up a mailing list on the issue and the documents they used for the webinar are supposed to be available for those on the mailing list. (I haven’t seen them as yet) The first thing to note about that model is that is that it is very much the creature of the IPC/BC constituency. The NCSG were not consulted and are developing their response to the accreditation model. My understanding is that the Registries/Registrars also did not provide input into that model. We should also comment - either through a Google Doc or on the wiki, but - in a very short space of time - we should be developing at least some response to the IPC/BC proposal. No response to their model could otherwise be taken as tacit community consent to its proposals. My two major issues with the model are as below. Please feel free to comment as well. My basic issue with their Access Model is that it confuses data ‘use’ with the ‘purpose’ of collection. Under basic data protection law, personal information can only be collected for specified and legitimate purposes of the data collector (ICANN and registrars) and not further processed in ways inconsistent with the legitimate purpose(s). The ALAC has suggested that feedback from the European DPAs will assist in determining the purposes consistent with ICANN and the Registries purpose in collection of that data. The purpose suggested in the Interim Model is not as broad as suggested by this Access Model and, in my view, preferable. (See Annex A, Access Model). The Access Model proposed suggests that, once parties are accredited, they would gain access to all the Whois Information. In my view, any access to personal information should be in limited circumstances only - that blanket access not be given. In a law enforcement context, search warrants generally need some kind of judicial sanction, based on apprehension of possible criminality, before premises can be searched and/or persons apprehended. While an access request test probably would not be quite that stringent, I could not support access seekers being given blanket permission to access personal information generally; there should be a requirement for reasonable grounds to suspect unlawful or harmful action in specific circumstances (carefully defined) before access given. Holly

5 7

Fwd: [APAC Space] Community Discussion on Accreditation and Access Model for Non-Public WHOIS Data
by Holly Raiche April 6, 2018

April 6, 2018

Folks This includes a link to the proposed accreditation model. The timing isn’t crash hot for the APAC region, for those who are interested, please register. I”ll read up on this and my suggestion is that we open up a wiki to discuss this model, since we have not been consulted about it. This was the one outstanding issue we had for the Interim Model, and this is our chance to have a look. When I have had a chance to look at it, I”ll post comments and hope others will have a look as well Holly Begin forwarded message: > From: ajay(a)xgenplus.com > Subject: Re: [APAC Space] Community Discussion on Accreditation and Access Model for Non-Public WHOIS Data > Date: 6 April 2018 1:15:23 pm AEST > To: discuss(a)apacspace.asia > Reply-To: discuss(a)apacspace.asia > > > Since business and IP constituency is leading it, I would request to address the followings. > > 1. Will registered trade name owners rights be protected or diluted in this new proposed model. > > 2. Any possibility to register and link TradeMark registeration details with domain Whois. > > Looking forward to attend the call > > Thanks > > Ajay > > > > > On 06-Apr-2018 at 07:33:46 > Joyce Chen 'joyce.chen(a)icann.org' wrote: > Dear APAC Space members, > > You are invited to join a call tonight at 22:00 SGT / 14:00 UTC led by the Business and Intellectual Property (IP) Constituencies in ICANN to seek community’s input on the Accreditation and Access Model for Non-Public WHOIS Data, which is proposed to be implemented in parallel with the Proposed Interim Compliance Model for GDPR. The duration of the call will be two hours. > > To join this call, please email admin-accred-model(a)icann.org for call details. > > You may wish to refer to the call invitation here:http://www.ipconstituency.org/assets/Outreach/Invitation%20to%20Commun… > > Thank you. > > Warm Regards, > Joyce Chen > GSE Strategy & Development Senior Manager > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > Direct Line: +65 6816 1287 > Mobile: +65 8338 8653 > Email: joyce.chen(a)icann.org > Skype: joyce.chen.icann > www.icann.org > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "APAC Space Discussion" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to discuss+unsubscribe(a)apacspace.asia. > To post to this group, send email to discuss(a)apacspace.asia. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/a/apacspace.asia/group/discuss/. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/apacspace.asia/d/msgid/discuss/FC2F3EF7-CB7F-4A…. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/a/apacspace.asia/d/optout. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "APAC Space Discussion" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to discuss+unsubscribe(a)apacspace.asia. > To post to this group, send email to discuss(a)apacspace.asia. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/a/apacspace.asia/group/discuss/. > To view this discussion on the web visithttps://groups.google.com/a/apacspace.asia/d/msgid/discuss/899383338.8…. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/a/apacspace.asia/d/optout.

1 1

Public Comment on changes to Community TLDs
by Alan Greenberg April 4, 2018

April 4, 2018

Community TLDs have been of interest and importance to At-Large. ICANN has put out a proposal for how such TLDs could be changed once delegated and Justine Chew volunteered to look at it. In general, the draft procedure is fine, but Justine did identify a few places where change is warranted and has drafted a statement. The comment period formally closed yesterday, but we have a short extension. Please review the draft comment at https://community.icann.org/x/fBW8B, and if you have any thoughts, please add a comment to the Wiki prior to 23:59 UTC on Thursday, 05 April 2018. For the record, I support the comment and thank Justine for doing this. Alan

1 0

GDPR statement
by Alan Greenberg April 3, 2018

April 3, 2018

Bastiaan has drafted what I think is an excellent statement summarizing our discussion on GDPR at the last ALAC meeting, slightly amended by me. It is posted at https://community.icann.org/x/Ay68B as the version to be voted on. Please review immediately and let us know if there are any errors or omissions. It will be submitted tomorrow morning EU time. Alan

9 8

KSK Rollover Statement
by Alan Greenberg April 1, 2018

April 1, 2018

Based on discussions during this week's ALAC Meeting, I have posted a final version of the statement to be submitted. I beleive it covers all of the issues raised and makes a number of clear and understandable statements - https://community.icann.org/x/dw28B. The submission deadline is tomorrow so please take a look at it and let me know if there are any errors in it. Alan

10 9

Re: [ALAC] KSK Rollover Statement
by tijani.benjemaa＠topnet.tn April 1, 2018

April 1, 2018

The statement looks good for me. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- TIJANI BEN JEMAA Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI) Phone: +216 98 330 114 +216 52 385 114 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Le 31 mars 2018 à 23:48, Javier Rua <javrua(a)gmail.com> a écrit : > > Thanks Alan; I have read it and agree. > > Javier Rúa-Jovet > +1-787-396-6511 > twitter: @javrua > skype: javier.rua1 > https://www.linkedin.com/in/javrua > > > > On Mar 31, 2018, at 6:24 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> > wrote: > > >> Based on discussions during this week's ALAC Meeting, I have posted a >> final version of the statement to be submitted. I beleive it covers all >> of the issues raised and makes a number of clear and understandable >> statements - https://community.icann.org/x/dw28B. >> >> The submission deadline is tomorrow so please take a look at it and let >> me know if there are any errors in it. >> >> Alan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ALAC mailing list >> ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac >> >> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org >> ALAC Working >> Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

1 0