- ALAC - lists.icann.org

Re: [ALAC] Fwd: [ccnso-council] Reminder: Dial in details Council Call 15 Nov 12:00 UTC
by Alan Greenberg Nov. 14, 2011

Nov. 14, 2011

Cheryl, I can open the Motion, but not the JIG Response file. Alan At 14/11/2011 03:54 PM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote: >ALAC, IDN Liaison / WG and Regional Leaders *Especially APRALO*, > >Please find below an email to the attention of the ccNSO Council >(who meet later today) referencing the attached Motion for >JIG-WG (joint ccNSO & GNSO) response and associated letter to ICANN >Board regarding single character IDN TLD's... > >I *strongly recommend* (not only as your ccNSO Liasion but as >someone who has supported and worked in 'matters of IDN's for many >years now as an essential issue for Asia Pacific and beyond) that >the ALAC (via its ExCom and of course with the endorsement of the >IDN Liaison and his associated topic WG) formally endorse this >letter to the ICANN Board. And that we specifically with relation to >points a., b., and c., from the letter adopt this as formal ALAC advice... > >I further recommend that APRALO also undertakes similar action to >endorses / supports this letter as Regional / RALO endorsed advice... > >Finally if the ALAC / ALAC ExCom so desire I would be happy to >report to the ccNSO Council at their meeting later today that such >endorsement action / discussion is currently underway... > >I look forward to your *URGENT and timely* advice on this matter,... >I also assume that the GNSO Liaison might also have opinion / action >plan to offer on this issue. > > >Kindest regards, > > >Cheryl Langdon-Orr >(CLO) > > > >---------- Forwarded message ---------- >From: Jian Zhang <<mailto:jian@aptld.org>jian(a)aptld.org> >Date: 15 November 2011 02:36 >Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] Reminder: Dial in details Council Call >15 Nov 12:00 UTC >To: Lesley Cowley <<mailto:lesley@nominet.org.uk>lesley(a)nominet.org.uk> >Cc: <mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>ccnso-council(a)icann.org, Bart >Boswinkel <<mailto:bart.boswinkel@icann.org>bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org> > > >Dear Lesley: > >JIG drafted a response letter to ICANN board in response to board >August resolution on single char IDN. JIG would like to circulate >this to both ccNSO and GNSO councils for the considerations. > >Sorry for the last minute submission. > >Best regards > >Jian Zhang > > > > > >From: ><mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org>owner-ccnso-council(a)icann.org >[mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Kristina Nordstrom >Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 4:30 PM >To: <mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>ccnso-council(a)icann.org >Subject: [ccnso-council] Reminder: Dial in details Council Call 15 >Nov 12:00 UTC > > > >Dear all, > >The next ccNSO Council Call will take place tomorrow Tuesday 15 >November at 12:00 UTC. Please find the dial in details below. > >Dial in numbers: <http://www.adigo.com/icann/>http://www.adigo.com/icann/ >Conference ID: 5258 > >Other time zones: ><http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html > >Kind regards, >Kristina > >Content-Type: >application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document; > name="JIG Response to ICANN Board Resolution on Single > Character IDN TLDs --" > final.docx" >Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="JIG Response to ICANN Board" > Resolution on Single Character IDN TLDs -- final.docx" >X-Attachment-Id: 23d46f6b2b235418_0.1 > >Content-Type: >application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document; > name="Motion for JIG Response to Aug 2011 Board Resolution.docx" >Content-Disposition: attachment; > filename="Motion for JIG Response to Aug 2011 Board Resolution.docx" >X-Attachment-Id: 23d46f6b2b235418_0.2

2 1

Fwd: [ccnso-council] Reminder: Dial in details Council Call 15 Nov 12:00 UTC
by Cheryl Langdon-Orr Nov. 14, 2011

Nov. 14, 2011

ALAC, IDN Liaison / WG and Regional Leaders *Especially APRALO*, Please find below an email to the attention of the ccNSO Council (who meet later today) referencing the attached Motion for JIG-WG (joint ccNSO & GNSO) response and associated letter to ICANN Board regarding single character IDN TLD's... I *strongly recommend* (not only as your ccNSO Liasion but as someone who has supported and worked in 'matters of IDN's for many years now as an essential issue for Asia Pacific and beyond) that the ALAC (via its ExCom and of course with the endorsement of the IDN Liaison and his associated topic WG) formally endorse this letter to the ICANN Board. And that we specifically with relation to points a., b., and c., from the letter adopt this as formal ALAC advice... I further recommend that APRALO also undertakes similar action to endorses / supports this letter as Regional / RALO endorsed advice... Finally if the ALAC / ALAC ExCom so desire I would be happy to report to the ccNSO Council at their meeting later today that such endorsement action / discussion is currently underway... I look forward to your *URGENT and timely* advice on this matter,... I also assume that the GNSO Liaison might also have opinion / action plan to offer on this issue. Kindest regards, Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jian Zhang <jian(a)aptld.org> Date: 15 November 2011 02:36 Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] Reminder: Dial in details Council Call 15 Nov 12:00 UTC To: Lesley Cowley <lesley(a)nominet.org.uk> Cc: ccnso-council(a)icann.org, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org> Dear Lesley:**** JIG drafted a response letter to ICANN board in response to board August resolution on single char IDN. JIG would like to circulate this to both ccNSO and GNSO councils for the considerations.**** Sorry for the last minute submission.**** Best regards**** Jian Zhang**** ** ** ** ** *From:* owner-ccnso-council(a)icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Kristina Nordstrom *Sent:* Monday, November 14, 2011 4:30 PM *To:* ccnso-council(a)icann.org *Subject:* [ccnso-council] Reminder: Dial in details Council Call 15 Nov 12:00 UTC**** ** ** Dear all, The next ccNSO Council Call will take place tomorrow Tuesday* 15 November *at *12:00 UTC*. Please find the dial in details below. Dial in numbers: http://www.adigo.com/icann/ Conference ID: 5258 Other time zones: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html Kind regards, Kristina****

1 0

Re: [ALAC] Comments Requested: Draft 2012-2015 Strategic Plan
by Evan Leibovitch Nov. 5, 2011

Nov. 5, 2011

In response to the call for comments on the ICANN Strategic Plan, I wish to advance the following position as ALAC advice: > *Periodically, ICANN indulges itself in a re-evaluation of its Strategic > Plan. There are presentations from senior staff, workshops, and a > significant chunk of At-Large policy-making time on the Tuesday allocated > to this endeavour.* > > *We submit that that this exercise is a massive waste of time and energy, > not just on the part of At-Large but of all of ICANN. In fact, at this > critical time (US Government contracts up for renewal, changes at both CEO > and Board Chair, and increasing pressure from governments to scrap the > whole multi-stakeholder experiment), such an energy consuming exercise in > "navel-gazing" simply calls public attention to the extent of which ICANN > is out of touch with the community it is supposed to serve. We submit that > the abandonment of this charade of creating laminated "motherhood > statements" and diversion of energies to matters more pressing is urgently > called upon.* > > *ICANN's role is well defined and its scope should be fairly focused. It > strategic plan should needs fine tuning at best -- and certainly not an > overhaul of the kind being requested on a frequent and ongoing basis. That > any broad changes are contemplated indicates either mission creep or > capture -- or both. ICANN has never lived up to its aspirational > "strategic" plans of the past, allowing staff rather than the community to > really determine the priorities regardless of what the words say. > Compounding the farce is the charging of this same staff with evaluating > its own success. As a result, the community spends more time in endless > reviews of the plan than in actually holding ICANN accountable for its > execution.* > > *We request that ICANN focus its resources -- and those of its volunteers > -- on genuinely implementing the strategies it has already defined before > repeatedly coming back to the community to engage in further rounds of > self-absorbed distraction.* > I have added this statement to the comment section of the appropriate At-Large wiki page<https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Workspace+for+th…>. I wish to submit it for approval as a position of the At-Large Advisory Committee. Failing that, I would like to solicit support from community members in the submission of a minority position. I am certainly open to modification of the message to make it more broadly acceptable but I hope that the main point intended by the statement is reasonably unambiguous. Note: I am doing this as an individual ALAC member, not as representing any existing position of my region or the ALAC Executive Committee to which I belong. A version of this statement has already been made to the NARALO mailing list, and during an ALAC teleconference briefing on the strategic plan. Thank you for your consideration. - Evan On 4 November 2011 18:38, ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org>wrote: > Dear All, > > > > The message below was originally sent on 21 October 2011. However, since > many At-Large representatives were travelling to Dakar for the 42nd ICANN > Meeting at that time, the Chair of ALAC has asked staff to re-send it to > ensure that as many At-Large members are made aware of the call for > comments > on the Draft 2012-2015 Strategic Plan as possible. > > > > ICANN is currently seeking community input on the Draft 2012-2015 Strategic > Plan <http://goo.gl/pX4EM> until 17 December 2011. > > > > An At-Large Workspace for the ICANN Strategic Plan 2012-2015 has been > created to serve as a central point for information on the four strategic > focus areas as identified by ICANN as well as the key issues that members > of > the At-Large community should address in their comments. Each RALO is > requested to submit their comments on the 2012-2015 Strategic Plan on their > specific Regional Strategic Planning Workspaces located on the main > Workspace. > > > > Regards, > > Heidi Ullrich, Seth Greene, Gisella Gruber-White, Matt Ashtiani, Nathalie > Peregrine, Marilyn Vernon > > ICANN At-Large Staff > > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC-Announce mailing list > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce > > At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org >

1 0

GAC Communiqué (Resend to public list)
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 28, 2011

Oct. 28, 2011

http://gac.icann.org GAC Communiqué - Dakar I. Introduction The Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) met in Dakar, Senegal during the week of October 22-27, 2011. Forty-nine Governments participated in the meeting: 46 present and 3 by remote participation and six Observers. The GAC expresses warm thanks to the local hosts, The Ministry of Communication, Telecommunications and Information Technology (MICOMTELTIC) and the Regulatory Authority for Telecommunications and Post (ARTP) for their hospitality in organizing the meeting and ICANN for supporting the GAC during the meeting. II. New gTLDs The GAC further discussed and decided on the formulation of GAC advice for inclusion in Module 3 of the Applicant Guidebook [Annex I]. During the discussion ICANN Staff underlined their understanding that advice regarding the definition of Geographic Names should be adopted by the GAC. The GAC congratulates the JAS working group on the final report and recommendations, which are consistent with GAC advice. The GAC looks forward to the Board providing clear timelines for implementation of the recommendations to enable needy applicants to join in full and meaningfully in the first round. The GAC raised concern about the unpredictability of the actual number of applications that governments would have to digest to proceed after the end of the application period. The GAC made clear, that if the number of applications published by ICANN significantly exceeds 500, GAC members might not be able to process a very large number of applications in the very short early warning procedure and in the limited time for issuing GAC advice on all these strings. Further, the GAC asked ICANN for clarification about its intention to process these applications in batches of 500, in the case that there are more than 500 applications. The GAC urges ICANN to clarify the procedures and implications for applicants being processed in different batches, as this might have implications for competition and applicants' business models. Following presentations by the ICANN staff and the Security and Stability Advisory Committee, the GAC took note of the SSAC consideration of the combined impact of new gTLDs and other changes such as the introduction of IPv6, DNSSEC and IDNs to the root. The GAC welcomes the confirmation of the commitment by the ICANN Board to provide a full report with a complete analysis, including all underlying data, of the root system scalability well before the opening of the new gTLDs application round. The GAC further welcomes the confirmation of the commitment by the Board to evaluate the impact on the system after the 1st round, with the understanding that the launch of a second round is contingent on the outcome of this evaluation, in particular the absence of negative effects on the root system. The GAC believes that in order for this evaluation to be effective, an appropriate and trustable monitoring system needs to be in place. In its discussions with the Board regarding the Communication Plan for new gTLDs, the GAC emphasised the importance of promoting the gTLDs application round in all countries, including developing countries. The GAC suggested that levels of awareness be continually assessed and reviewed, and priorities and target areas under the Plan be adjusted accordingly in the run up to the launch of the round. The GAC welcomed the assurances received from the Board and staff that the evaluation of applications will ensure a level playing field for applicants and that any conflicts of interest will be identified and avoided accordingly. III. Law Enforcement (LEA) Recommendations In recent years, the Internet has grown to have over two billion users and be a significant contributor to the global economy. Cyber-crime is a growing threat to the security and stability of the Internet, with broad and direct public policy impacts. Recent estimates suggest that the direct financial impact of cyber crime is extremely significant. Law enforcement agencies have identified a series of specific problems which are limiting their ability to address this growing problem. As part of this, law enforcement agencies have identified specific areas of concern in the ICANN context, relating to contractual weaknesses and a lack of necessary due diligence. To address these urgent problems, in 2009 law enforcement agencies made 12 concrete recommendations to reduce the risk of criminal abuse of the domain name system. These recommendations were informally socialized with the registrar community, the GAC, and with ICANN compliance staff over the course of several months, before the GAC advised the Board in its Brussels communiqué that it formally endorsed the recommendations. Direct exchanges between law enforcement agencies and registrars continued in September 2010 in Washington D.C., in February 2011 in Brussels, and during the March and June 2011 ICANN meetings. As a complement to the June exchanges in Singapore, the GAC urged the Board to support actions necessary to implement those recommendations as a matter of urgency. To date, none of the recommendations have been implemented, and the risks remain. The GAC therefore advises the ICANN Board to take the necessary steps to ensure that ICANN's multistakeholder process effectively addresses these GAC-endorsed proposals as a matter of extreme urgency. IV. Accountability and Transparency Review Team Recommendations (ATRT) The GAC welcomes the update provided by ICANN staff on the ATRT Recommendations progress and the suggestions presented with regards to the implementation of recommendations 9 through 14 on the GAC role, effectiveness and interaction with the Board. The GAC looks forward to an expedited implementation of the Joint Working Group and ATRT recommendations and is keen to continue working with the Board on the Recommendations related to the GAC. V. Conflict of interest The GAC expresses extreme concern about the inadequacy of the existing rules of ethics and conflict of interest in the light of recent events and therefore welcomes the approval of the motion by the Board Governance Committee on 15 September 2011 concerning "ethics and conflicts of interest". The GAC looks forward to the publication of a timeline with clear and effective actions as a conclusion of the Dakar meeting or shortly thereafter. In order to ensure the legitimacy and sustainability of the multi-stakeholder model as enshrined in ICANN, the GAC underlines the extreme urgency of putting in place effective and enforceable rules on conflicts of interest. The GAC will keep this important issue under review and may come forward with further advice before the Costa Rica GAC meetings. VI. Meeting with the Generic Names Supporting Organisation (GNSO) The GAC and the GNSO exchanged views on a number of issues, beginning with an overview by ICANN staff of the GNSO policy development process. Consistent with the recommendations of the Accountability and Transparency Review Team and the related GAC-Board Joint Working Group, the GAC stressed its interest in ensuring that GAC views are provided and taken into account at early stages in the policy development process. The meeting also discussed the implementation of the Law Enforcement Agency (LEA) recommendations to mitigate Domain Name System abuse, which were endorsed by the GAC in June 2010. The GAC expressed its disappointment that registrars were only able to report on their consideration of three of the twelve LEA Recommendations. Further, the reported progress fell substantially short of what GAC members believed had been achieved during its meetings with registrars in Singapore in June 2011. The GAC also expressed concern that there was no clarity on how the other nine recommendations were being progressed, despite the registrars' agreement at the Singapore meeting to provide regular status reports. The GAC informed the GNSO Council of its intention to request the ICANN Board to take prompt and concrete action to implement the GAC/LEA recommendations. The meeting also addressed the GAC's proposal to the GNSO on the protection mechanism for the International Olympic Committee and Red Cross/Red Crescent names at the top and second levels. The GAC requested feedback from the GNSO on the proposal as a first step in collaborating on advice for the ICANN Board in this regard, consistent with the ICANN Board Resolution in Singapore. The GAC looks forward to further engagement with the GNSO to work more effectively within the ICANN processes and reinforce the sustainability of the multi-stakeholder model. VII. Meeting with the At-Large Advisory Group (ALAC) The GAC met with the ALAC to discuss Conflict of Interest issues within the ICANN Board and staff. The GAC agrees that this is a critical matter that needs to be addressed as a high priority within the community. The GAC and ALAC also discussed the Joint Applicant Support (JAS) Working Group as well as the ALAC and GAC Joint Statement. The GAC expects a decision to be taken for implementation in time for the opening of the first new gTLD round. In light of the common interest of advancing improvements in the ICANN model, the GAC and ALAC also discussed the ongoing work of the Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT). The GAC shared the areas identified as a priority in the framework of the ATRT and the Joint Working Group recommendations, looking forward to an expedited implementation. VIII. GAC Operating Principles The GAC amended Principle 47 of its Operating Principles clarifying its understanding of consensus. The definition now introduced derives from United Nations practice and understands consensus as adopting decisions by general agreement in the absence of formal objections. The GAC noted that according to UN practice individual members may make reservations, declarations, statements of interpretation and/or statements of position regarding a consensus decision, provided such texts do not represent an objection to the consensus [Annex II]. IX. Joint session with the Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) The GAC met with the ccNSO to discuss the progress and ongoing work of the Framework of Interpretation cross-community Working Group (FoI) on delegation and redelegation, and the mechanisms for the GAC to provide feedback and contribute to this work within a timeline that the ccNSO has provided. In addition, the ccNSO shared an update of its current work areas and its organisational structure. The GAC is eager to further engage with the ccNSO to provide timely inputs on the different stages of the FoI work. X. Meeting with the Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) The GAC thanks the SSAC for providing an update on its work including blocking and reputation systems, WHOIS matters and single label domain names. Further, the GAC thanks the SSAC Chair for discussions on Root Zone Scaling and Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI). The GAC looks forward to receiving further updates on DNS blocking matters and other relevant security and stability related matters. XI. Meeting with the Nominating Committee (NomCom) The GAC met with the Nominating Committee and discussed the skill-sets needed of an ICANN Director, as outlined in the Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT) recommendations to improve the selection process. The NomCom invited individual GAC members to provide further inputs. XII. Election of Vice-chairs The GAC has reelected the current vice-chairs, Choon-Sai Lim (Singapore), Maria Häll (Sweden) and Alice Munyua (Kenya) to continue their mandate for another year. *** The GAC warmly thanks all those among the ICANN community who have contributed to the dialogue with the GAC in Dakar. The GAC will meet during the period of the 43rd ICANN meeting in San José, Costa Rica.

1 0

ALAC IDN WG meeting in Dakar
by Edmon Chung Oct. 25, 2011

Oct. 25, 2011

Hi Everyone, As mentioned during our Sunday session when we talked about WGs, was wondering if it would be possible to try to convene an ad hoc meeting here in Dakar to get the IDN WG restarted. This is a terribly late notice, but for those who can make it, lets try to meet right after the current session: Tuesday Oct 25, Time: 17:30 (or right after the current session if this overruns :-P) Room: B12 (where we had the afralo showcase) With a very brief proposed agenda: 1. A reworked description/scope for the group 2. Issues of interest 3. Call for participation 4. Regular meetings & Next steps Hoping to have everyone interested in IDN (or not) join :-) Edmon

1 0

FW: IDN Liaison
by ICANN At-Large Staff Oct. 25, 2011

Oct. 25, 2011

> >************************************************************************ >Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:16:08 +0200 >From: Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz(a)belenus.iks-jena.de> >To: at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >Cc: Matt Ashtiani <matt.ashtiani(a)icann.org>, > Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com>, > ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org>, > alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org, alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >Subject: Re: FW: IDN Liaison >Message-ID: <20111025101608.GA8381(a)belenus.iks-jena.de> >References: <CACB7532.2C7A6%matt.ashtiani(a)icann.org> ><CACB7594.2C7AA%matt.ashtiani(a)icann.org> >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Disposition: inline >In-Reply-To: <CACB7594.2C7AA%matt.ashtiani(a)icann.org> >X-message-flag: Please send plain text messages only. Thank you. >User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) >Status: RO >Content-Length: 365 >Lines: 10 > >On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 01:07:48PM -0700, Matt Ashtiani wrote: >> Do you intend to accept the nomination of SSAC Liaison? > >Yes. Sorry, I was busy during the last few days. > >> If so, it is critical that you accept the nomination by >> tonight by sending an email to the At-Large Worldwide mailing list, >> CCing the ALAC Announce and ALAC Working mailing lists. > >Done. > >************************************************************************

1 0

FW: 2011-2012 ALAC Officer Election - Schedule and Nominees
by ICANN At-Large Staff Oct. 25, 2011

Oct. 25, 2011

-----Original Message----- From: Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa(a)fmai.org> Reply-To: "tijani.benjemaa(a)fmai.org" <tijani.benjemaa(a)fmai.org> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:29:35 -0700 To: Matt Ashtiani <matt.ashtiani(a)icann.org> Subject: Fwd: RE: 2011-2012 ALAC Officer Election - Schedule and Nominees >On mar 25/10/11 15:22 , Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa(a)fmai.org> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> I would like to thank all of you who nominated or supported me for the >> position of Rapporteur. >> I would like to thank Dave Kissoondoyal for nominating me for the >> position of Vice Chair; I do appreciate your trust Dave, thank you. >> >> I do accept to serve as rapporteur, and hope to do it as satisfactory as >> possible. >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> Tijani BEN JEMAA >> Executive Director >> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations >> Phone : + 216 70 825 231 >> Mobile : + 216 98 330 114 >> Fax : + 216 70 825 231 >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >>

1 0

Fwd: IDN Liaison
by Edmon Chung Oct. 25, 2011

Oct. 25, 2011

alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Edmon Chung <edmon(a)isoc.hk> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 04:46:59 +0800 Subject: Re: IDN Liaison To: Matt Ashtiani <matt.ashtiani(a)icann.org> Cc: Edmon Chung <edmon(a)registry.asia>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com>, ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org>, Pavan Budhrani <pavan(a)registry.asia>, Yannis Li <yannis(a)registry.asia> hi everyone, am happy to accept the nomination and to continue to serve as the idn liaison for alac. edmon

3 2

Liaison Nominations for 2011
by Cheryl Langdon-Orr Oct. 25, 2011

Oct. 25, 2011

Please be advised that as an ALAC Member I wish to nominate an eminently qualified experienced and willing to serve should she be selected by the SSAC, for the role of ALAC Liaison, the auDA Boards (and auDA is an org member of ISOC-AU re ALS status) Independant Director and lead in our country code ccTLD SSAC, for consideration... Julie has attended several ICANN Meetings and most recently in Singapore attended and began contribution to the Cross Community DSSA-WG's activities as an invited guest / expert, so should the mantle of SSAC Liaison fall to her the Liaison role in the DSSA-WG will not require transition or much of a learning curve... Below is the part of the 2011 auDA Annual Report to give you a little more background on Julie... Air Vice-Marshal Julie Hammer AM, CSC – Independent Director Air Vice-Marshal Julie Hammer, an electronics engineer, served in the Royal Australian Air Force for over 28 years in the fields of aircraft maintenance, technical intelligence, electronic warfare, and ICT systems. She acted as the CIO for Defence for the year prior to her retirement. She holds a Bachelor of Science with Honours in Physics, a Masters degree in Aero Systems Engineering, a Graduate Diploma in Strategic Studies and a Doctor of Engineering Honoris Causa. She was National President of Engineers Australia throughout 2008 and has been a Director of auDA since April 2007. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO)

1 0

NCSG liaison
by Beau Brendler Oct. 24, 2011

Oct. 24, 2011

Hello colleagues. For a variety of reasons it's no longer feasible for me to continue as liaison to the NCSG (though I am happy to give a report in Dakar to finish my time in the post). I therefore nominate Evan Leibovitch for the role. Evan has made substantial strides in working across the various groups and factions of ICANN, and as the NCSG grows and evolves the ALAC will need someone like Evan who has good working relationships with all the key individuals. Thanks, Beau

5 5