- ALAC - lists.icann.org

Nairobi meeting is reaffirmed
by Alan Greenberg Jan. 22, 2010

Jan. 22, 2010

The ICANN Board has met and decided that the meeting will go on. See http://blog.icann.org/2010/01/icann-remains-committed-to-nairobi-and-africa/. Further details will no doubt be released over the coming days. Alan

1 0

Re: [ALAC] ICANN Nairobi
by Cheryl Langdon-Orr Jan. 21, 2010

Jan. 21, 2010

Beat me to saying that Adam :-)... and I've also asked if this is really very low figure this far OUT from the close of registrations for ICANN Meetings (and when even sponsored travelers have only just or not yet had their arrangement confirmed) I also remain *unconvinced* that this 'point of concern' is a highly valid one OR a winning argument to me at least=> but YES please Do ALL Register and pass the encouraging word onto other to as well... CLO 2010/1/21 Adam Peake <ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp> > Hi, > > Could anyone planning to attend the ICANN meeting in Nairobi please > register. Seems the numbers are quite low, 335 as of now, and I don't see > so many ALAC folks <http://www.registration123.com/ICANN/Nairobi/> It's > not helping the organizers plan the event. > > Adam > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org > > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac > -- Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO)

5 5

Re: [ALAC] [At-Large] Strategic Planning 2010-2013 - draft ALAC comments
by Sébastien Bachollet Jan. 21, 2010

Jan. 21, 2010

Hello Siva, Thanks for your comments. We have had some discussion about the financing of all those events and I am not convince that we will be able to have that organize in one single 3 years plan. I am ideal world yes a GA in each region during a 2 years period (the time for ICANN to go in Each regions) and a Summit in the next 2 years cycle. But with all the other issue At-Large have to take care of, I think if we can have a GA in each region during the next plan and a Summit after that it will be not too bad. Also this 3 years will allow each region to reach more ALSes and to involve them in policy work. All the best Sébastien Bachollet sebastien(a)bachollet.com +33 6 07 66 89 33 > -----Message d'origine----- > De : at-large-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large- > bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] De la part de Sivasubramanian > Muthusamy > Envoyé : lundi 18 janvier 2010 15:12 > À : At-Large Worldwide > Cc : At-Large Worldwide > Objet : Re: [At-Large] Strategic Planning 2010-2013 - draft ALAC > comments > > Hello Sebastian, > > > One quick comment: > > > Timeline: > > > - 2010 2013 > - One RALO General Assembly in each region, > - To recruit new ALSes to cover 80% of the countries in > each > region. > - 2013 - 2016 > - A second ICANN At-Large Summit, > - New ALSes to join. > > The first at-Large summit was in 2009 March. The second summit has to > be no > later than 2012 March, better if it happens by 2011 March. There after > there will be an at-Large summit at least once in two years. In the > timeline > above, we could at least move the second ICANN at Large summit to 2010- > 13 > and indicate two summits during 2013-2015 > > > > Sivasubramanian Muthusamy > http://www.isocmadras.com > facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh > LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6 > Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz > > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Sébastien Bachollet < > sebastien(a)bachollet.com> wrote: > > > All, > > > > Please find, on the Wiki, a document that assembled comments from the > > various RALOs (and Vanda) with the objective to have one single > document to > > be commented and validated by ALAC. > > > > > > https://st.icann.org/alac- > docs/index.cgi?alac_statement_on_icann_draft_strat > > egic_plan_2010_2013_al_alac_st_0110_1 > > > > > > > > Your comments (on the Wiki) are welcome. > > > > > > > > Off course the comments establish by each RALO can be send to ICANN > also. > > > > > > > > All the best > > > > > > > > Sébastien Bachollet > > > > <mailto:sebastien@bachollet.com> sebastien(a)bachollet.com > > > > +33 6 07 66 89 33 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > At-Large mailing list > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge- > lists.icann.org > > > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > > > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge- > lists.icann.org > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

1 0

ICANN Nairobi
by Adam Peake Jan. 21, 2010

Jan. 21, 2010

Hi, Could anyone planning to attend the ICANN meeting in Nairobi please register. Seems the numbers are quite low, 335 as of now, and I don't see so many ALAC folks <http://www.registration123.com/ICANN/Nairobi/> It's not helping the organizers plan the event. Adam

1 0

ALAC comment on Affirmation of Commitments Review Process
by Heidi Ullrich Jan. 21, 2010

Jan. 21, 2010

Dear All, As you are aware, ICANN is about to embark on a review process as required by the Affirmation of Commitments. A Draft Proposal on how the reviews should be conducted has been issued and the public comment period closes on 31 January (see: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#affrev) A call for review team members has also been issued (see: http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-13jan10-en.htm) In order to have an ALAC statement submitted to meet the deadline, the ALAC officers have drafted a proposed statement which can be found on the ALAC wiki at: https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?alac_comment_on_aoc_processes . Please review this document and use the comment function to indicate your support as well as any additions/changes. It is very important that this be done by Monday, 25 January 23:59 UTC. A revised version will be issued prior to the ALAC meeting on Tuesday, 26 January for a brief discussion. A formal vote will begin the following the day. It is extremely important that the ALAC provide their comments on this important process within the time-period specified. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White, Marilyn Vernon, Kristina Nordström ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org website: www.atlarge.icann.org<http://www.atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

Last call for comments - Expression Of Interest proposal
by Patrick Vande Walle Jan. 18, 2010

Jan. 18, 2010

Dear colleagues, The current draft of the ALAC statement on the Expression of Interest proposal now includes the comments received so far, either through the wiki, mailing list or direct conversations. Please see: https://st.icann.org/gnso-liaison/index.cgi?draft_statement_on_expression_o… The deadline for submitting comments on the staff proposal is on the 27th January I will take additional comments until next Wednesday 20th January, so it can be voted on at the ALAC teleconference on the 26th. Thanks to all -- Patrick Vande Walle

4 3

Strategic Planning 2010-2013 - draft ALAC comments
by Sébastien Bachollet Jan. 18, 2010

Jan. 18, 2010

All, Please find, on the Wiki, a document that assembled comments from the various RALOs (and Vanda) with the objective to have one single document to be commented and validated by ALAC. https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?alac_statement_on_icann_draft_strat egic_plan_2010_2013_al_alac_st_0110_1 Your comments (on the Wiki) are welcome. Off course the comments establish by each RALO can be send to ICANN also. All the best Sébastien Bachollet <mailto:sebastien@bachollet.com> sebastien(a)bachollet.com +33 6 07 66 89 33

1 0

Information on the HSTLD advisory group
by Heidi Ullrich Jan. 16, 2010

Jan. 16, 2010

Dear All, An action item from the 22 December 2009 ALAC meeting was for staff to provide you with information on the HSTLD advisory group. Dave Piscitello, Senior Security Technologist at ICANN, has provided the following information on this advisory group: The HSTLD advisory group is reviewing the concept paper published in conjunction with DAGv3. The group will assist ICANN staff (primarily security team and services) in (1) reviewing the public comments, (2) studying the merits of the verification program, (3) assess the risks the HSTLD should address/mitigate, and ultimately, (4) revise the concept paper and provide finer details for the program elements. Andy Welch is the lead consultant from KPMG, which has been hired by the ICANN CISA to assist staff in new TLD security initiatives. KPMG participated in the composition of the original concept paper, which was developed based on the malicious conduct explanatory memorandum and requirements submitted to ICANN staff from financial, law enforcement, security, and anti-phishing communities. The concept paper noted above is available at: http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/high-security-zone-verification-04… A briefing paper related to this group is available at: http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/briefing-hstld-24nov09-en.pdf The HSTLD advisory group webpage is available at: http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/hstld-program-en.htm Please let us know if you would like any additional information on this advisory group. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White, Marilyn Vernon, Kristina Nordström ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org website: www.atlarge.icann.org<http://www.atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

Re: [ALAC] At-Large voices in Policy Podcast
by Cheryl Langdon-Orr Jan. 13, 2010

Jan. 13, 2010

Hi Scott thanks for the reply (and I hope there is not too much residual rust ;-) I've copied At-Large staff and our ALAC working list as I'd like to see (at least) two things happen:- 1. the Regions have a listen to and discuss this pilot episode in their upcoming monthly meetings (with a view to a more fulsome discussion at our OneDay meeting on the Sunday at Nairobi where we are looking at ways to better engage 'our public' and 'members'... 2. We all look at what use of volunteers we might be able to organize and other 'work around plans'... Certainly I know the AfRALO, APRALO & LACRALO leadership would be very keen to look at this opportunity to better engage and outreach to local community in the plethora of language we have in our regions and I fully expect EURALO to feel the same though of course there is a greater use of EN as a second language in many of their ALSes... So I expect ofter we 'do a bit of brainstorming' we'll be getting back to you real soon... :-) <copy of original message from Scott pasted here> Hi Cheryl, I thought I'd send you a sneak preview of how the policy podcast is progressing, especially since you kindly facilitated my recording some At-Large voices in Seoul. During January, we will try to produce one more episode of the podcast. We are targeting 1 Feb. for the "Grand Opening" of a new E-Learning page on the ICANN site, and we hope to launch it with three podcast episodes ready to go. Then, we'll add another every month. The E-Learning page will also aggregate webinars and audio briefings; a one-stop shop for learning about ICANN issues via new media. The episode with the new opening is too large to email, but you can download it from my 4shared account: http://www.4shared.com/file/176082994/e98c4fe5/Start_Ep01.html Hope you like it -- and thanks again for At-Large's contribution! -- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Scott PInzon, CISSP Director, Policy Communications ICANN <end copy & paste> 2010/1/13 Scott Pinzon <policycomms(a)gmail.com> > Hi Cheryl! I apologize for the long lag time in responding. The holidays > were all it took to lock my brain in a crust of rust. > > Last question first: The episode has been approved by Dave P and Denise, so > there is no harm in showing it to anyone you want. > > Re: translation. Yes, I very much would like to have ICANN Start in other > languages. We are in a budget crunch until June, so I have no funding for > translating and re-recording the podcast. If you (and the At-Large > community) can suggest workarounds that depend on volunteer labor but still > maintain quality you would be comfortable with, I'm all ears! > > > > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr(a)gmail.com>wrote: > >> Thanks SOOOO Much for this Scott :-) I find this extremely exciting and >> useful It's literally helping me see where we could (and of course) should >> go in our ICANN Outreach and better equipping our ALSes and their members to >> be better briefing on these normally rather complex matters as a Light ( as >> opposed to the oncoming train) at the end of the tunnel) and I'm sure our >> At-Large Community will also :-) And we do appreciate the multilingual new >> start and your thanks to our community members who aided you ;-) Now ON >> this thorny matter of multilingualism are you looking towards "syndication >> of these" gems for "reproduction into other "voices" as that is something I >> think our various local language communities ( via our RALO's and ALSes) >> as outreach tools then I'm sure we would be very interested in discussing >> all this so that our more global needs can be proactively met... So we can >> be "ICANN One World, One Internet, Everyone Connected (in Many Voices)" ;-) >> and of course if our voices are used it should come cheaper than other >> options and gain interest ownership and usage / promulgation of these >> excellent tools :-) >> >> Final matter when can we leak this out to our community :-) >> >> CLO >> >> >> >> >> 2009/12/22 Scott Pinzon <policycomms(a)gmail.com> >> >> Hi Cheryl, >>> >>> I thought I'd send you a sneak preview of how the policy podcast is >>> progressing, especially since you kindly facilitated my recording some >>> At-Large voices in Seoul. >>> >>> During January, we will try to produce one more episode of the podcast. >>> We are targeting 1 Feb. for the "Grand Opening" of a new E-Learning page on >>> the ICANN site, and we hope to launch it with three podcast episodes ready >>> to go. Then, we'll add another every month. The E-Learning page will also >>> aggregate webinars and audio briefings; a one-stop shop for learning about >>> ICANN issues via new media. >>> >>> The episode with the new opening is too large to email, but you can >>> download it from my 4shared account: >>> >>> http://www.4shared.com/file/176082994/e98c4fe5/Start_Ep01.html >>> >>> Hope you like it -- and thanks again for At-Large's contribution! >>> -- >>> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >>> Scott PInzon, CISSP >>> Director, Policy Communications >>> ICANN >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheryl Langdon-Orr >> (CLO) >> >> > > > -- > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > Scott PInzon, CISSP > Director, Policy Communications > ICANN > -- Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO)

1 0

Re: [ALAC] Final Draft of White Paper on At-Large Board Member Selection (ABS) and Appointment process for your pre release feedback
by Evan Leibovitch Jan. 11, 2010

Jan. 11, 2010

2010/1/10 Adam Peake <ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp> I'd like to white paper to make clear At Large believes it essential it has > a second Director position, and until such time as there is a second voting > Director the liaison should remain. > The scope of the White Paper was intended to be limited to the mechanics of choosing a Director, with the desired result being a process that would be presented to -- and endorsed by -- the Board. The White Paper identified weaknesses in having a single Director but did not engage in direct advocacy for a position that has -- at least for now -- been explicitly rejected by the Board. I agree that the push for second director/liaison still needs to be made, but I'm not sure that a process recommendation is the place to do it. The paper doesn't recommend the size of the slate/number of candidates on > the ballot, but I get the sense it might be quite late (12+) Or am I > missing something? > That was explicitly discussed. Under the original process that was developed at the NARALO brainstorm, this might well have been the result. Under the process recommended in the White Paper, the ABSC would be charged with finding qualified candidates and producing a list. No explicit limits have yet been defined, but the White Paper suggests that it should be between two and four for any given election. Once that initial list is released, "petition" candidates that were rejected by the ABSC can be put back on the ballot. While there has been no limit on the number of petition candidates, they will require endorsement by three RALOs so there should not be many added this way. The final recommendation may have explicit limits if we wish. > If RALO's can direct how their delegates vote then the processes the RALO > uses to decide on which candidate to vote for should be transparent, rules > made clear before hand. > Agreed. The proposal is that the Chair of each RALO will have a directed vote -- it is up to each region's RoP whether its ALAC representatives may be directed in the same manner. One option is to automate the process, so that the preference of the ALSs is submitted directly as a vote without the Chair's intervention. That will work, at least, for a single round. - Evan

2 2