January 2011 - ALAC - lists.icann.org

Re: [ALAC] Urgent: proposed email to GAC/ Board Chairs
by Alan Greenberg Jan. 13, 2011

Jan. 13, 2011

I have had neither any involvement or knowledge of this change, but I do note that it comes in parallel with the change from requiring a local host who made a very substantial contribution to the meeting, to ICANN being largely responsible for (at least some) meetings - a change for which there has been a great deal of demand within ICANN. If the budget (from ICANN fuinds) for such meetings is to not go up, increased sponsorship revenue is pretty much required (or a VERY reduced budget and/or charges for attendance). Alan At 12/01/2011 07:36 PM, Fouad Bajwa wrote: >...and just in case anyone may has noticed it or not, if you go to the >sponsorship page of the ICANN meeting page at >http://meetings.icann.org/sponsorship , ICANN has increased the >sponsorship costs by factors of 2.5 to 10, so much about >"multi-stakeholder" and bottom-up stuff. Top sponsorship per ICANN >meeting is half a million dollars and the minimum sponsorship to have >a stand was increased to USD 25K from USD 10K. This excludes alot of >stakaeholders and people that may want to also set-up stall and raise >awareness about their groups.

1 0

ACTION: Call for RALO Volunteers for Joint DNS Security and Stability Analysis Working Group open through 20 January
by Heidi Ullrich Jan. 13, 2011

Jan. 13, 2011

Dear All, On behalf of Olivier Crépin-Leblond, ALAC Chair, a call for volunteers from the RALOs to the Joint DNS Security and Stability Analysis Working Group (DSSA WG) is being made through 20 January 2011. The objective of the DSSA WG is to: - Examine the level, frequency and severity of threats to the DNS - Review the current efforts and activities intended to mitigate these threats; and - Identify possible gaps in the current security response to DNS issues. The ALAC endorsed the Charter of DSSA WG during the ICANN Meeting in Cartagena in December 2010 (the Charter is available on the Joint DSSA WG At-Large Workspace<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Joint+DSSA+WG+-+At-Large+Worksp…> available at: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Joint+DSSA+WG+-+At-Large+Worksp…) As the GNSO and ccNSO have adopted the Charter and the NRO is in the process of adopting it, the ALAC is now calling for a volunteers from the RALOs to join the DSSA WG. If you would like to become an At-Large representative of the DSSA WG, please note that the following membership criteria apply: 1) You should have knowledge or expertise of the objectives of the DSSA WG. 2) You should be prepared to actively participate in the activities of the WG on an on-going and long-term basis. 3) You should be prepared, if required, to sign a Formal Affirmation of Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure paper (see Annex B of the Charter) and/or a Non-Disclosure Agreement. The WG may decide to establish a sub-working group to access confidential or proprietary information. If you are interested in participating in such a sub-working group, you will most likely be required to sign one or both of the aforementioned agreements in order to ensure access to and protection of confidential information. If you are interested in joining this Working Group, please send a Statement of Interest by Thursday, 20 January at 23:59 UTC to At-Large staff (staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>) containing the following information: - Current vocation, employer and position - Type of work performed - Identify any financial ownership or senior management/leadership interest in organizations that are interested parties in DSSA related topics - Identify any type of commercial or non-commercial interest in DSSA related topics. Are you representing other parties? Describe any arrangements/agreements between you and any other group, constituency or person(s) regarding your nomination/selection as a work group member. - DSSA Working Group members are expected to demonstrate knowledge or expertise aspects of the objectives of the DSSA WG. Please identify any knowledge, expertise, or experience that you have that would be relevant to the work of the DSSA Working Group. - Describe any tangible or intangible benefit that you receive from participation in such processes, for example, if you are an academic or non-governmental organization and use your position to advance your ability to participate, this should be part of the Statement of Interest, just as should employment by an organization that has an interest in DSSA Working Group outcomes. The Statements of Interest will be posted on the DSSA Working Group website. Olivier Crépin-Leblond, ALAC Chair, will serve as a co-chair of the DSSA Working Group. The ALAC would ideally like to have a minimum of one representative from each region serve on the DSSA Working Group. The ALAC will review the Statements of Interest and formally select At-Large representatives to the DSSA Working Group during their meeting of 25 January 2011. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Seth Greene, Gisella Gruber-White, Marilyn Vernon, ICANN At-Large Staff

1 0

Fwd: Re: AGAT description
by Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Jan. 7, 2011

Jan. 7, 2011

Dear ALAC members, At the Executive Committee (ExCom) conference call yesterday, Evan Leibovitch proposed the creation of a sub-group operating under the New gTLD Working Group already in place: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+New+gTLDs This new sub-group would be called AGAT-WT - The Applicant Guidebook Alternate Text Working Team. Evan's description of the group is as follows: The Applicant Guidebook Alternate Text (AGAT) Working Team is intended to be comprised of a small number of end-user-focused members of the ICANN community. This Team will create specific wording change proposals to the new gTLD Applicant Guidebook (AG) designed to address specific (and substantial) issues raised by the At-Large Community, the Government Advisory Committee (GAC) and others. Its intent is to * Respond to Board and GAC concerns within specific areas of the AG -- notably on applicant support in lesser developed economies and objections based on strings perceived to be offensive. * Define an *implementation* of existing policy that differs from the current ICANN (staff) interpretations. * Deliver wording (and commentary as applicable) that is straightforward and does not require "refining" by staff (except for legal purposes). * Maintain the consensus decisions made by the Recommendation 6 Cross-Community Working Group (CWG) while offering specific wording changes to issues on which the group was deadlocked. * Be open and transparent (though some initial preparatory work may be closed). The group will NOT: * Re-open non-controversial components of the AG that are already considered resolved (*). * Contravene existing GNSO policy (this is about process and wording detail, not high-level policy. * Implement any wording going against any consensus achieved by the CWG. The timing is such that this group is asked to have at least a rough form of its proposed wording changes available in advance of the GAC/Board meeting likely to take place in Geneva, at the end of February 2011. Endorsement by as many ICANN communities as possible is desirable, but lack thereof must not impair its transmission to the Board in time for consideration. It is our hope that this contribution may serve as a catalyst for an accommodation between the ICANN communities on such contentions issues. --------------------- (*) -- while not on the Board or GAC commentaries, the user-focused community has strong views on a single regressive change regarding the trademark-related take-down notices. This Working Team may propose suggestions here too even though they may be beyond the bounds of the Board or GAC communications. The ALAC Executive Committee is looking forward to receive comments and suggestions from the ALAC on this proposed sub-group. Due to short deadlines, we cannot wait to discuss this at the monthly ALAC call at the end of this month. Would you be in favour of the creation of this sub-group? Any objections? Would you be interested in joining it? I look forward to receiving your feedback. Best wishes, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond ALAC Chair

1 0

45 days remaining supply of IPV4?
by Evan Leibovitch Jan. 4, 2011

Jan. 4, 2011

Here's one online tool predicting an IANA exhaustion date of Feb 20, 2011 http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/ -- - Evan

4 3

Re: [ALAC] ccNSO news for ALAC
by Cheryl Langdon-Orr Jan. 3, 2011

Jan. 3, 2011

Thanks Ron, copied now to ALAC Working and the At-Large lists... Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) On 4 January 2011 01:58, Ron Sherwood <ron(a)vitechnicalservices.com> wrote: > <http://www.nominet.org.uk/news/latest?contentId=8089#MainContent>Lesley > Cowley awarded OBE in Queen's New Year's Honours List > December 31 2010 > We are delighted to announce that Lesley Cowley was awarded an OBE for > services to the Internet and e-commerce in the Queen's New Year's Honours > List. > > Baroness Rennie Fritchie DBE, Chair of Nominet, said: "Lesley has worked > with vision and commitment to ensure that the UK has one of the largest and > most successful Internet infrastructures in the world. But she has also gone > well beyond the call of duty to ensure that the UK is actively influencing > international policy to make sure the Internet is a safe and trusted place. > All involved with Nominet congratulate her on this deserved award." > > Lesley commented: "2010 was a major year for us in many ways and this is a > wonderful start to 2011. I was surprised and delighted to receive this great > honour. This award is recognition of the hard work and commitment of all of > the Nominet staff, and everyone involved with Nominet, to make using the > Internet a trusted and positive experience for all." > >

1 0

Fwd: ATRT Final report and recommendations as sent to the ICANN Board.
by Cheryl Langdon-Orr Jan. 1, 2011

Jan. 1, 2011

In advance of more formal publication of the attached document please find, FYI, the Final Report and Recommendations of the Accountability and Transparency Review Team sent a short while ago to the ICANN Board... Staff can be post this to our usual announce and relevant lists please and insert it in the ATRT Wiki page we set up at the beginning of this process. It has been my honor and privilege to serve as your ALAC representative on this inaugural ATRT post AoC; I also trust you will be well satisfied with the outcomes we were able to establish, and see this as an important foundation for the work of the next ATRT and in the improvement of ICANN's A&T... Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Brian Cute <brianacute(a)gmail.com> Date: 1 January 2011 04:32 Subject: Re: Latest draft To: olivier.muron(a)orange-ftgroup.com Cc: manal(a)tra.gov.eg, ceo(a)auda.org.au, jbladel(a)godaddy.com, langdonorr(a)gmail.com, zhangxinsheng(a)miit.gov.cn, eiriarte(a)alfa-redi.org, lstrickling(a)ntia.doc.gov, wadelman(a)godaddy.com, peter.dengatethrush(a)icann.org, caffsouza(a)gmail.com, falexander(a)ntia.doc.gov, guofeng(a)catr.cn, fabio(a)colasanti.it, chrisdisspain888(a)msn.com, alice.jansen(a)icann.org, olof.nordling(a)icann.org, louienet(a)gmail.com RT, The Final Recommendations have just been sent to the Board and are attached here. Alice, could you please see that this is posted promptly to the ICANN website (as an Announcement) and to the AoC site as well. Thanks to all for the great work in the last week! It's not perfect, but it is in good shape thanks to your efforts. It has been and honor and a pleasure to work with all of you. Have a very Happy New Year! Best regards, Brian On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:06 AM, <olivier.muron(a)orange-ftgroup.com> wrote: > I find the final draft very fine! > > A small edit page 67: the face-to-face meeting was held on October 11-13, > 2010 and not 2007 > > Happy New Year to all of you. > > Olivier > (just back in Paris after a US vacation prolongated by the snow) > ------------------------------ > *De :* Louie Lee [mailto:louienet@gmail.com] > *Envoyé :* vendredi 31 décembre 2010 10:02 > *À :* Brian Cute > *Cc :* Manal Ismail; Chris Disspain; JamesM. Bladel; Cheryl Langdon-Orr; > ZHANG Xinsheng; Erick Iriarte Iriarte Ahon; MURON Olivier RD-DIR-ISS; > Lawrence E. Strickling; Warren Adelman; Peter Dengate Thrush; Carlos Affonso > Pereira de Souza; Fiona Alexander; guo; Fabio Colasanti; > chrisdisspain888(a)msn.com; Alice Jansen; Olof Nordling > *Objet :* Re: Latest draft > > No glaring error! Just need some line justification adjustments here > and there. > > If you want to correct a word for me.... > The "member" in "Independent Expert team member" in my Appendix text should > be plural: members. > > Thank you! > > Louie > -- > > > On Dec 30, 2010, at 10:12 PM, Brian Cute <brianacute(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > FINAL DRAFT ATTACHED - 2 more edits to go. > > I have two tasks for the morning: > > 1. Revise the page numbers in the footnotes referencing the Berkman Center > report since the pagination has changed. > > 2. Resolve the issue of the missing footnote text for 3 footnotes. > > Beyond that I believe I have captured most of the suggested edits. IF YOU > SEE A GLARING ERROR, PLEASE CALL IT TO MY ATTENTION. > > Once I have addressed #1 and 2 above, I will send the final PDF version to > Alice and Olof for posting. > > Regards, > Brian > > 2010/12/30 Brian Cute < <brianacute(a)gmail.com>brianacute(a)gmail.com> > >> RT, >> >> Attached is the latest version. I have been maintaining my own version of >> the "master" document and have now integrated the comments from Larry and a >> couple of substantive edits from Louie (Appendix A) and Cheryl >> (Recommendation 19). I am still adding some of the grammar and formatting >> edits from Louie and Cheryl. I also added an edit to Appendix A re: >> Management of Public Comments. >> >> Please provide feedback on the following: >> >> 1. Currently, the "priority recommendations are listed as # 7, 9, 10, 11, >> 15, 16, 17 and 23. PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU AGREE WITH THIS LIST. >> >> 2. Let me know if I have missed substantive edits you provided in the >> last few days. >> >> Please note the following: >> >> 1. I have asked Denise Michel and Alice for assistance in getting links to >> the documents for the 2 missing footnotes (James is assisting on one as >> well.) >> >> 2. I will do a final edit of all the footnotes and a spell check. >> >> If there are any other items, please send me edits now. I intend to send >> this to the Board no later than tomorrow morning U.S. EST. >> >> Thanks all for your focus on getting this document finished. >> >> Regards, >> Brian >> P.S. As requested, Chris is copied above on his <http://msn.com/>msn.comemail. >> 2010/12/30 Manal Ismail < <manal(a)tra.gov.eg>manal(a)tra.gov.eg> >> >> Brian .. >>> >>> I thought it's worth bringing to your attention that the version Louie >>> commented on (the latest) is different from the version Larry commented on >>> .. >>> >>> --Manal >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> من: Louie Lee [mailto: <louienet(a)gmail.com>louienet(a)gmail.com] >>> تاريخ الإرسال: الخميس 30/12/2010 05:41 ص >>> إلى: Manal Ismail; Brian Cute >>> نسخة: Chris Disspain; James M. Bladel; Cheryl Langdon-Orr; ZHANG >>> Xinsheng; Erick Iriarte Iriarte Ahon; Olivier Muron; Lawrence E. Strickling; >>> Warren Adelman; Peter Dengate Thrush; Carlos Affonso Pereira de Souza; Fiona >>> Alexander; guo; Fabio Colasanti >>> الموضوع: Re: Latest draft >>> >>> >>> Err.... and here's the attachment. :) >>> >>> >> > <ATRTFinalRecommendations.doc> > >

5 4

Re: [ALAC] [ALAC-ExCom] ICANN 2011-2014 strategic plan feedback
by Cheryl Langdon-Orr Jan. 1, 2011

Jan. 1, 2011

Of course we do... and drawing on the transcripts and Q&A from the calls and meetings we have had on the matter the appropriate WT-C input (perhaps some of you know the Co-Chaors of that group ;-) and ExCom could craft draft text (in my view at least) for ALAC consideration before the deadline... we may as well have an ExCom meeting on or about the deadline date for final drafting any way and again we need to note that the formal ALAC PC comments CAN go into the PC 'under current vote' so in on time, then a follow up confirmation of the ratification message is the sent... Not ideal but a practical solution at this time of year IMO... Remember a Wiki space is already set up => https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ICANN+Strategic+Planning+Develo… and you should also ask each RALO Chair to contribute comments as APRALO and EURALO have already and these RALO's also need to be asked if they wish to expand or say more (note the AfRALO fuller one already done needs to be added here as well) then (as I did in previous years) we can also include each RALO and any ALS comments as well => (call for those on the RALO lists:?) in our master documentation as appendixes... OCL I've been so bold as to copy this reply to the ALAC Working list to hopefully kick start this process, but you and i assume Carlton as Rapporteur, will need to follow up... Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) On 2 January 2011 00:27, Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa(a)fmai.org> wrote: > Dear Olivier, > > I do think we need to have an ALAC comment on this important document. Last > year, ALAC did, and Sébastien held the pen. AFRALO also participated in the > ALAC comment, and sent also it's own one. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Tijani BEN JEMAA > Directeur exécutif > Fédération Méditerranéenne des Associations d'Internet > Phone : + 216 70 825 231 > Mobile : + 216 98 330 114 > Fax : + 216 70 825 231 > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : alac-excom-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > [mailto:alac-excom-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] De la part de Olivier > MJ > Crepin-Leblond > Envoyé : samedi 1 janvier 2011 12:09 > À : ALAC EXCOM > Objet : [ALAC-ExCom] ICANN 2011-2014 strategic plan feedback > > Dear colleagues, > > AFRALO is preparing a comment on the 2011-2014 ICANN Strategic Plan. > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/afri-discuss/2010q4/001398.html > > Are we, as ALAC, also planning to prepare a comment? To meet the January > 10 deadline, time is of the essence. > > Kind regards, > > Olivier > > -- > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD > http://www.gih.com/ocl.html > > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC-ExCom mailing list > ALAC-ExCom(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-excom > > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC-ExCom mailing list > ALAC-ExCom(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-excom >

1 0

Re: [ALAC] [At-Large] Fwd: ATRT Final report and recommendations as sent to the ICANN Board.
by Cheryl Langdon-Orr Jan. 1, 2011

Jan. 1, 2011

Public and the ICANN Community had a chance to comment on the recommendations that went into the report (resulting as noted in the body text on some modifications / clarifications and edits to these recommendations) already (that PC was pre Cartagena meeting ending the Friday before the meeting started) this report is under the terms of the AoC for the Board to read, react and respond to... Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) On 1 January 2011 14:14, Antony Van Couvering <avc(a)namesatwork.com> wrote: > Thank you Cheryl. Will the public have an opportunity to comment on this > report? > > Best regards, > > Antony > > > > On Dec 31, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote: > > > In advance of more formal publication of the attached document please > find, > > FYI, the Final Report and Recommendations of the Accountability > > and Transparency Review Team sent a short while ago to the ICANN Board... > > > > Staff can be post this to our usual announce and relevant lists please > and > > insert it in the ATRT Wiki page we set up at the beginning of this > process. > > > > It has been my honor and privilege to serve as your ALAC representative > on > > this inaugural ATRT post AoC; I also trust you will be well satisfied > with > > the outcomes we were able to establish, and see this as an important > > foundation for the work of the next ATRT and in the improvement of > ICANN's > > A&T... > > > > > > Cheryl Langdon-Orr > > (CLO) > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Brian Cute <brianacute(a)gmail.com> > > Date: 1 January 2011 04:32 > > Subject: Re: Latest draft > > To: olivier.muron(a)orange-ftgroup.com > > Cc: manal(a)tra.gov.eg, ceo(a)auda.org.au, jbladel(a)godaddy.com, > > langdonorr(a)gmail.com, zhangxinsheng(a)miit.gov.cn, eiriarte(a)alfa-redi.org, > > lstrickling(a)ntia.doc.gov, wadelman(a)godaddy.com, > > peter.dengatethrush(a)icann.org, caffsouza(a)gmail.com, > falexander(a)ntia.doc.gov, > > guofeng(a)catr.cn, fabio(a)colasanti.it, chrisdisspain888(a)msn.com, > > alice.jansen(a)icann.org, olof.nordling(a)icann.org, louienet(a)gmail.com > > > > > > RT, > > > > The Final Recommendations have just been sent to the Board and are > attached > > here. Alice, could you please see that this is posted promptly to the > ICANN > > website (as an Announcement) and to the AoC site as well. > > > > Thanks to all for the great work in the last week! It's not perfect, but > it > > is in good shape thanks to your efforts. It has been and honor and a > > pleasure to work with all of you. Have a very Happy New Year! > > > > Best regards, > > Brian > > > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:06 AM, <olivier.muron(a)orange-ftgroup.com> > wrote: > > > >> I find the final draft very fine! > >> > >> A small edit page 67: the face-to-face meeting was held on October > 11-13, > >> 2010 and not 2007 > >> > >> Happy New Year to all of you. > >> > >> Olivier > >> (just back in Paris after a US vacation prolongated by the snow) > >> ------------------------------ > >> *De :* Louie Lee [mailto:louienet@gmail.com] > >> *Envoyé :* vendredi 31 décembre 2010 10:02 > >> *À :* Brian Cute > >> *Cc :* Manal Ismail; Chris Disspain; JamesM. Bladel; Cheryl Langdon-Orr; > >> ZHANG Xinsheng; Erick Iriarte Iriarte Ahon; MURON Olivier RD-DIR-ISS; > >> Lawrence E. Strickling; Warren Adelman; Peter Dengate Thrush; Carlos > Affonso > >> Pereira de Souza; Fiona Alexander; guo; Fabio Colasanti; > >> chrisdisspain888(a)msn.com; Alice Jansen; Olof Nordling > >> *Objet :* Re: Latest draft > >> > >> No glaring error! Just need some line justification adjustments here > >> and there. > >> > >> If you want to correct a word for me.... > >> The "member" in "Independent Expert team member" in my Appendix text > should > >> be plural: members. > >> > >> Thank you! > >> > >> Louie > >> -- > >> > >> > >> On Dec 30, 2010, at 10:12 PM, Brian Cute <brianacute(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> FINAL DRAFT ATTACHED - 2 more edits to go. > >> > >> I have two tasks for the morning: > >> > >> 1. Revise the page numbers in the footnotes referencing the Berkman > Center > >> report since the pagination has changed. > >> > >> 2. Resolve the issue of the missing footnote text for 3 footnotes. > >> > >> Beyond that I believe I have captured most of the suggested edits. IF > YOU > >> SEE A GLARING ERROR, PLEASE CALL IT TO MY ATTENTION. > >> > >> Once I have addressed #1 and 2 above, I will send the final PDF version > to > >> Alice and Olof for posting. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Brian > >> > >> 2010/12/30 Brian Cute < <brianacute(a)gmail.com>brianacute(a)gmail.com> > >> > >>> RT, > >>> > >>> Attached is the latest version. I have been maintaining my own version > of > >>> the "master" document and have now integrated the comments from Larry > and a > >>> couple of substantive edits from Louie (Appendix A) and Cheryl > >>> (Recommendation 19). I am still adding some of the grammar and > formatting > >>> edits from Louie and Cheryl. I also added an edit to Appendix A re: > >>> Management of Public Comments. > >>> > >>> Please provide feedback on the following: > >>> > >>> 1. Currently, the "priority recommendations are listed as # 7, 9, 10, > 11, > >>> 15, 16, 17 and 23. PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU AGREE WITH THIS LIST. > >>> > >>> 2. Let me know if I have missed substantive edits you provided in the > >>> last few days. > >>> > >>> Please note the following: > >>> > >>> 1. I have asked Denise Michel and Alice for assistance in getting links > to > >>> the documents for the 2 missing footnotes (James is assisting on one as > >>> well.) > >>> > >>> 2. I will do a final edit of all the footnotes and a spell check. > >>> > >>> If there are any other items, please send me edits now. I intend to > send > >>> this to the Board no later than tomorrow morning U.S. EST. > >>> > >>> Thanks all for your focus on getting this document finished. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Brian > >>> P.S. As requested, Chris is copied above on his <http://msn.com/ > >msn.comemail. > >>> 2010/12/30 Manal Ismail < <manal(a)tra.gov.eg>manal(a)tra.gov.eg> > >>> > >>> Brian .. > >>>> > >>>> I thought it's worth bringing to your attention that the version Louie > >>>> commented on (the latest) is different from the version Larry > commented on > >>>> .. > >>>> > >>>> --Manal > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ________________________________ > >>>> > >>>> من: Louie Lee [mailto: <louienet(a)gmail.com>louienet(a)gmail.com] > >>>> تاريخ الإرسال: الخميس 30/12/2010 05:41 ص > >>>> إلى: Manal Ismail; Brian Cute > >>>> نسخة: Chris Disspain; James M. Bladel; Cheryl Langdon-Orr; ZHANG > >>>> Xinsheng; Erick Iriarte Iriarte Ahon; Olivier Muron; Lawrence E. > Strickling; > >>>> Warren Adelman; Peter Dengate Thrush; Carlos Affonso Pereira de Souza; > Fiona > >>>> Alexander; guo; Fabio Colasanti > >>>> الموضوع: Re: Latest draft > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Err.... and here's the attachment. :) > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> <ATRTFinalRecommendations.doc> > >> > >> > > > <ATRTFinalRecommendations123110.pdf>_______________________________________________ > > At-Large mailing list > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > > > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

1 0