- ALAC - lists.icann.org

Re: [ALAC] [lac-discuss-en] At-Large: Part of the private sector? Part of Civil Society?
by Carlton Samuels Sept. 3, 2015

Sept. 3, 2015

Alberto: Oh yes. I readily acknowledge it might take some effort in thinking to connect Argentine definitions of a 'user' in law which, in evidence, you so enthusiastically embraced to the discriminatory - and ,IMHO - shabby intent of the attack on Lance Hinds' work and welfare. In our corner of the world and purely on exercising the rule of reason, this would be clear evidence of intellectual dishonesty. It was a teachable moment. I shall take the time to catalog the evidence of similar transgressions on reason and judgment in due course. Watch this this space. -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 10:48 PM, <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> wrote: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Re: At-Large: Part of the private sector? Part of Civil Society? > From: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org > > Dear Carlton, regret your mistake, this is the box of apples and pears > have brought. > Apologies to the rest of the list. > Best regards > > > Alberto Soto > > > -----Original Message----- > From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: > lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of > carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com > Posted on: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 4:19 pm > To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > CC: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; ALAC < > alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] At-Large: Part of the private sector? Part > of Civil Society? > > > > > [[Translated text (en -> en) -]] > > > Subject: Re: At-Large: Part of the private sector? Part of Civil Society? > From: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com > > > Alberto: > Here it is, presumably, citing Argentina law: > > > > > '* In Argentina, the Law on Consumer Protection, says in Article 1. This > law aims to protect consumers or users. consumer considers the natural or > legal person who acquires or uses, for free or for consideration, goods or > services as an end in themselves or their family or social group. * > > > > > * Here and throughout the world, the end user has two defenders. One for > when you have problems with products or services; and to defend their > interests within ICANN. '* > > > > > It would have been helpful if this bit of scholarship was exerted > belonging to the charges against Lance Hinds in the last elections [in] > LACRALO action. > > > > > I guess you see the ALS Iberoamericana as a defender of consumer and user > rights ICANN, yes? > > > > > So now, under Argentine law, consumers and users are defined and co- > recognized as both "natural and legal persons". Think about the > amount of pain > I could have saved ourselves a little demonstration of leadership? You > I could have saved all of us to hear from the dullard world > which often disguise opinion as reported in LACRALO. > > > > > That view of the dullard originated in Argentina makes me doubly sure > what happened in this election was a conspiracy failed and appearance > ignorance. > > > > > Ritz-Carlton Samuels > > > > > > > > > > > > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Cell: 876-818-1799 > * Strategy, Planning, Government, evaluation and delivery * > ============================= > > > > > On Mon, August 31, 2015 at 8:12 pm, Alberto Soto < > asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Alan, I did a semantic analysis, using the dictionary of the Royal > > Spanish Academy. > > > > Public Sector: all public organizations and agencies, organizations and > > companies subject to them. > > > > Private Sector: That is not public or state property, but belongs to > > individuals. > > > > Society: natural grouping of people agreed that unit are different from > > each of the individuals, in order to meet, through mutual cooperation, > all > > or any of the purposes of life. > > > > Civil society, private sector, citizens and society relationships and > > private activities. > > > > In the Latin world, we have two large sectors: the public sector > > (government) and the (non-governmental) Private Sector. In the latter > > enters the civil society and non-governmental sectors all we know. > > > > This is quite consistent with the definition of the World Bank. Although > I > > agree that it should include the end user. > > > > In Argentina, the Law on Consumer Protection says in his article 1. This > > law aims to protect consumers or users. consumer is considered to the > > natural or legal person who acquires or uses, free of charge or for > > consideration, goods or services as an end in themselves or for their > > family or social group. > > > > Here and all over the world, the end user has two defenders. One for when > > you have problems with goods or services; and we to defend their > interests > > within ICANN. > > > > But in my opinion, again, the end user must appear as such when the > > components of civil society are described. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > Alberto > > > > > > > > *De:* alac-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: > > alac-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] *En nombre de *Alan Greenberg > > *Enviado el:* lunes, 31 de agosto de 2015 12:59 p. m. > > *Para:* ALAC <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > *Asunto:* [ALAC] At-Large: Part of the Private Sector? Part of Civil > > Society? > > > > > > > > These two questions seem to be coming up regularly. The current draft > > proposal of the CCWG-Accountability refers to ICANN being leg by the > > "Private Sector (as opposed to the Public Sector - Governments), and > > includes us in the Civil society part of the private sector. > > > > Looking at definitions can be useful. There are many of both terms. > > > > The most common definition of the Private Sector says it is everything > > that is not funded or controlled by government. Many definitions even > > explicitly list individuals as part of it. That certainly includes us. > > > > Some definitions talk about three groups, the public sector, the private > > sector (referring to for-profit organizations) and the "Voluntary > Sector". > > The latter certainly includes the formal parts of At-Large, but really > > leaves individuals, who are no longer part of ANY of the sectors. > > > > From my perspective, that means that if we are part of the "Private > > Sector", we better be explicitly listed as such. > > > > I would appreciate hearing how these terms are defined in other languages > > and cultures. > > > > > > The Wikipedia defines Civil Society as "aggregate of non-governmental > > organizations and institutions that manifest interests and will of > > citizens." Civil society includes the family and the private sphere, > > referred to as the "third sector" of society, distinct from government > and > > business. > > > > The World Bank has a more detailed definition: the term civil society to > > refer to the wide array of *non-governmental and not-for-profit > > organizations that have a presence in public life, expressing the > interests > > and values of their members or others, based on ethical, cultural, > > political, scientific, religious or philanthropic considerations. Civil > > Society Organizations (CSOs) therefore refer to a wide of array of > > organizations: community groups, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), > > labor unions, indigenous groups, charitable organizations, faith-based > > organizations, professional associations, and foundationsâ€ .* > > > > In both definitions, Civil Society is listed as essentially being defines > > as groups of one form or another. By those definitions, At-large and our > > components parts are certainly civil society, but the individuals whose > > interests we defend are not part of civil society per se. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Alan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> > > > > El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrÃ³nico en > > busca de virus. > > www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ALAC mailing list > > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > > > > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > > ALAC Working Wiki: > > > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > > > > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (es) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/aa92c1f066.html > --]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > >

1 0

Re: [ALAC] [lac-discuss-es] At-Large: Parte del sector privado? Parte de la Sociedad Civil?
by Alberto Soto Sept. 3, 2015

Sept. 3, 2015

Estimado Carlton, lamento tu equivocación, este es el cajón de manzanas, y has traído peras. Disculpas al resto de la lista. Saludos cordiales Alberto Soto -----Mensaje original----- De: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Enviado el: miércoles, 2 de septiembre de 2015 4:19 p. m. Para: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; ALAC <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] At-Large: Parte del sector privado? Parte de la Sociedad Civil? [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: At-Large: Parte del sector privado? Parte de la Sociedad Civil? De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Alberto: Aquí está, presumiblemente, citando la ley argentina: '* En Argentina, la Ley de Protección al Consumidor, dice en su artículo 1. Este ley tiene por objeto proteger a los consumidores o usuarios. consumidor se considera a la persona física o jurídica que adquiere o utiliza, de forma gratuita o por consideración, bienes o servicios como un fin en sí mismos o para su familia o grupo social. * * Aquí y en todo el mundo, el usuario final tiene dos defensores. Uno para cuando tiene problemas con productos o servicios; y para defender sus intereses dentro de ICANN. '* Hubiera sido tan útil si este bit de beca fue ejercida perteneciente a la acusación en contra de Lance Hinds en las últimas elecciones [en] acción en LACRALO. Supongo que usted ve el ALS Iberoamericana como defensor de los consumidores y usuarios los derechos de la ICANN, sí? Así que ahora, en el derecho argentino, los consumidores y los usuarios son co-definidos y son reconocidos como los dos "personas naturales y jurídicas". Piense en la cantidad de dolor que podría haber salvado a nosotros mismos con una pequeña demostración de liderazgo? Usted podría haber salvado a todos nosotros de escuchar la opinión de la dullard del mundo que suelen enmascararse opinión en cuanto informado en LACRALO. Ese punto de vista de la dullard originó en Argentina me hace doblemente seguro de que lo que ocurrió en esa elección fallida fue una conspiración y con apariencia de ignorancia. Ritz-Carlton Samuels ============================== Carlton Un Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planeación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos de entrega * ============================= El Lun, 31 de agosto 2015 a las 8:12 de la tarde, Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> escribió: > Dear Alan, I did a semantic analysis, using the dictionary of the Royal > Spanish Academy. > > Public Sector: all public organizations and agencies, organizations and > companies subject to them. > > Private Sector: That is not public or state property, but belongs to > individuals. > > Society: natural grouping of people agreed that unit are different from > each of the individuals, in order to meet, through mutual cooperation, all > or any of the purposes of life. > > Civil society, private sector, citizens and society relationships and > private activities. > > In the Latin world, we have two large sectors: the public sector > (government) and the (non-governmental) Private Sector. In the latter > enters the civil society and non-governmental sectors all we know. > > This is quite consistent with the definition of the World Bank. Although I > agree that it should include the end user. > > In Argentina, the Law on Consumer Protection says in his article 1. This > law aims to protect consumers or users. consumer is considered to the > natural or legal person who acquires or uses, free of charge or for > consideration, goods or services as an end in themselves or for their > family or social group. > > Here and all over the world, the end user has two defenders. One for when > you have problems with goods or services; and we to defend their interests > within ICANN. > > But in my opinion, again, the end user must appear as such when the > components of civil society are described. > > > > Regards > > > > Alberto > > > > *De:* alac-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: > alac-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] *En nombre de *Alan Greenberg > *Enviado el:* lunes, 31 de agosto de 2015 12:59 p. m. > *Para:* ALAC <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > *Asunto:* [ALAC] At-Large: Part of the Private Sector? Part of Civil > Society? > > > > These two questions seem to be coming up regularly. The current draft > proposal of the CCWG-Accountability refers to ICANN being leg by the > "Private Sector (as opposed to the Public Sector - Governments), and > includes us in the Civil society part of the private sector. > > Looking at definitions can be useful. There are many of both terms. > > The most common definition of the Private Sector says it is everything > that is not funded or controlled by government. Many definitions even > explicitly list individuals as part of it. That certainly includes us. > > Some definitions talk about three groups, the public sector, the private > sector (referring to for-profit organizations) and the "Voluntary Sector". > The latter certainly includes the formal parts of At-Large, but really > leaves individuals, who are no longer part of ANY of the sectors. > > From my perspective, that means that if we are part of the "Private > Sector", we better be explicitly listed as such. > > I would appreciate hearing how these terms are defined in other languages > and cultures. > > > The Wikipedia defines Civil Society as "aggregate of non-governmental > organizations and institutions that manifest interests and will of > citizens." Civil society includes the family and the private sphere, > referred to as the "third sector" of society, distinct from government and > business. > > The World Bank has a more detailed definition: the term civil society to > refer to the wide array of *non-governmental and not-for-profit > organizations that have a presence in public life, expressing the interests > and values of their members or others, based on ethical, cultural, > political, scientific, religious or philanthropic considerations. Civil > Society Organizations (CSOs) therefore refer to a wide of array of > organizations: community groups, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), > labor unions, indigenous groups, charitable organizations, faith-based > organizations, professional associations, and foundationsâ€.* > > In both definitions, Civil Society is listed as essentially being defines > as groups of one form or another. By those definitions, At-large and our > components parts are certainly civil society, but the individuals whose > interests we defend are not part of civil society per se. > > > Thoughts? > > Alan > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> > > El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrÃ³nico en > busca de virus. > www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> > > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > ALAC Working Wiki: > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9d931aeee2.html --]] --- El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

1 0

Fwd: [council] FW: ICANN News Alert -- Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
by Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Sept. 2, 2015

Sept. 2, 2015

Dear ALAC, as you'll see below, the public comment period for the Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures, marking the start of the process looking at the first round of new gTLD applications to prepare for a next round, has been released. There was discussion in the GNSO Council on the length of the comment period. After discussion in our last monthly conference call, I relayed the ALAC's wishes to have a long comment period closing *after* the Dublin meeting so as to allow for discussion in Dublin. This was not followed, although the next GNSO call might extend this. I shall reiterate the ALAC's wish for a longer public comment period. Kind regards, Olivier -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [council] FW: ICANN News Alert -- Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 06:06:55 +0000 From: Steve Chan <steve.chan(a)icann.org> To: council(a)gnso.icann.org <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Dear Councilors, This message is to inform you that the Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures has been published for public comment. The current close date is 10 October 2015, although the length of the public comment period will be a topic for discussion during the upcoming GNSO Council meeting. Best, Steve *Steven Chan* Sr. Policy Manager *ICANN *12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan(a)icann.org <mailto:steve.chan@icann.org> direct: +1.310.301.3886 mobile: +1.310.339.4410 tel: +1.310.301.5800 fax: +1.310.823.8649 From: ICANN News Alert <communications(a)icann.org <mailto:communications@icann.org>> Reply-To: ICANN News Alert <communications(a)icann.org <mailto:communications@icann.org>> Date: Monday, August 31, 2015 at 5:51 PM To: Steve Chan <steve.chan(a)icann.org <mailto:steve.chan@icann.org>> Subject: ICANN News Alert -- Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures ICANN News Alert ICANN <http://www.icann.org/> News Alert https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-08-31-en ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures 31 August 2015 *Forum Announcement:* Public Comment Period opens on *Date:* 31 August 2015 *Categories/Tags:* Policy Processes *Purpose (Brief):* This public comment proceeding is being opened to obtain community input on the Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures. *Public Comment Box Link:* https://www.icann.org/public-comments/new-gtld-subsequent-prelim-2015-08-31… This message was sent to steve.chan(a)icann.org <mailto:steve.chan@icann.org> from: ICANN News Alert | communications(a)icann.org <mailto:communications@icann.org> | ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Email Marketing by iContact - Try It Free! <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186> Manage Your Subscription <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=13773709&l=6333&s=6C1A&m=97…>

2 1

Re: [ALAC] At-Large: Part of the Private Sector? Part of Civil Society?
by Carlton Samuels Sept. 2, 2015

Sept. 2, 2015

Alberto: Here you are, presumably citing Argentine law: '*In Argentina, the Law on Consumer Protection says in his article 1. This law aims to protect consumers or users. consumer is considered to the natural or legal person who acquires or uses, free of charge or for consideration, goods or services as an end in themselves or for their family or social group.* *Here and all over the world, the end user has two defenders. One for when you have problems with goods or services; and we to defend their interests within ICANN.'* It would have been so useful if this bit of scholarship was brought to bear pertaining the accusation against Lance Hinds in the latest election [in] action in LACRALO. I take it you see the Ibero-American ALS as a defender of consumer and user rights in ICANN, yes? So now, in Argentine law, consumers and users are co-defined and are recognized as both "natural and legal persons". Think how much grief we could have saved ourselves with a little demonstration of leadership? You could have saved all of us listening to the dullard's view of the world that often masquerade as informed opinion in LACRALO. That the dullard's view originated in Argentina makes me doubly sure that what transpired in that botched election was a conspiracy under colour of ignorance. -Carlton Samuels ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> wrote: > Dear Alan, I did a semantic analysis, using the dictionary of the Royal > Spanish Academy. > > Public Sector: all public organizations and agencies, organizations and > companies subject to them. > > Private Sector: That is not public or state property, but belongs to > individuals. > > Society: natural grouping of people agreed that unit are different from > each of the individuals, in order to meet, through mutual cooperation, all > or any of the purposes of life. > > Civil society, private sector, citizens and society relationships and > private activities. > > In the Latin world, we have two large sectors: the public sector > (government) and the (non-governmental) Private Sector. In the latter > enters the civil society and non-governmental sectors all we know. > > This is quite consistent with the definition of the World Bank. Although I > agree that it should include the end user. > > In Argentina, the Law on Consumer Protection says in his article 1. This > law aims to protect consumers or users. consumer is considered to the > natural or legal person who acquires or uses, free of charge or for > consideration, goods or services as an end in themselves or for their > family or social group. > > Here and all over the world, the end user has two defenders. One for when > you have problems with goods or services; and we to defend their interests > within ICANN. > > But in my opinion, again, the end user must appear as such when the > components of civil society are described. > > > > Regards > > > > Alberto > > > > *De:* alac-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: > alac-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] *En nombre de *Alan Greenberg > *Enviado el:* lunes, 31 de agosto de 2015 12:59 p. m. > *Para:* ALAC <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > *Asunto:* [ALAC] At-Large: Part of the Private Sector? Part of Civil > Society? > > > > These two questions seem to be coming up regularly. The current draft > proposal of the CCWG-Accountability refers to ICANN being leg by the > "Private Sector (as opposed to the Public Sector - Governments), and > includes us in the Civil society part of the private sector. > > Looking at definitions can be useful. There are many of both terms. > > The most common definition of the Private Sector says it is everything > that is not funded or controlled by government. Many definitions even > explicitly list individuals as part of it. That certainly includes us. > > Some definitions talk about three groups, the public sector, the private > sector (referring to for-profit organizations) and the "Voluntary Sector". > The latter certainly includes the formal parts of At-Large, but really > leaves individuals, who are no longer part of ANY of the sectors. > > From my perspective, that means that if we are part of the "Private > Sector", we better be explicitly listed as such. > > I would appreciate hearing how these terms are defined in other languages > and cultures. > > > The Wikipedia defines Civil Society as "aggregate of non-governmental > organizations and institutions that manifest interests and will of > citizens." Civil society includes the family and the private sphere, > referred to as the "third sector" of society, distinct from government and > business. > > The World Bank has a more detailed definition: the term civil society to > refer to the wide array of *non-governmental and not-for-profit > organizations that have a presence in public life, expressing the interests > and values of their members or others, based on ethical, cultural, > political, scientific, religious or philanthropic considerations. Civil > Society Organizations (CSOs) therefore refer to a wide of array of > organizations: community groups, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), > labor unions, indigenous groups, charitable organizations, faith-based > organizations, professional associations, and foundations”.* > > In both definitions, Civil Society is listed as essentially being defines > as groups of one form or another. By those definitions, At-large and our > components parts are certainly civil society, but the individuals whose > interests we defend are not part of civil society per se. > > > Thoughts? > > Alan > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> > > El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en > busca de virus. > www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> > > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > ALAC Working Wiki: > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… >

1 0

Fwd: Public Comment: Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
by Carlton Samuels Sept. 1, 2015

Sept. 1, 2015

For those of you who care about what should happen in the event another round of gTLDs is forked by ICANN, this Preliminary Issues Report on Subsequent Procedures would be very important. It also a signal it is time for you to get engaged in this process. I have read the Executive Summary and gone straight to the details of matters that were of particular interest to me and in my estimation, the folks whose interests I advocate; developing country economies and social systems where the Internet is about social and economic development and could be our final game changer. I hope my friend and our colleague Evan Leibovitch is taking note here too. For although he has decreased his activities due to changes in his circumstances, his voice and consistent advocacy for positions that impact us still rings in my head on several of the matters raised in the Report. The domain name market remains largely the province of the dominant economies. Developing economies are still largely excluded by one or other barriers, some of them finely tuned for preference and aided and abetted, consciously and unconsciously, by ICANN policies. The Report groups the matters in five (5) broad categories which is quite useful in digesting. But speaking directly to those of us from developing economies and informed by my experience as Co-Chair of the Applicant Support Working Group in the last round, I urge you read closely the details of matters raised in: 4.2.3 - Competition, Consumer Trust and Choice 4.2.4 - Community Engagement 4.2.5 - Applicant Guide Book (AGB) 4.2.6 - Clarity of Application Process 4.2.7 - Application Accessed in Rounds 4.2.10 - Application Fees 4.2.11 - Communications 4.2.14 - Support for Applicants from Developing Countries 4.2.15 - Different TLD Types 4.2.17 - Variable Fees 4.3.5 - Registrar Discrimination 4.3.9 - Global Public Interest 4.4.5 - Community Applications You will find the report (in English) here: http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/subsequent-procedures-prelim-issu… Please ensure if you have comments you record them in the areas provided by the At-Large or GNSO. -Carlton Samuels ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= Dear All, This is to let you know that the Public Comment on the Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures has now gone live: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/new-gtld-subsequent-prelim-2015-08-31… The dates of the Public Comment will be 31 August 2015 — 10 October 2015 23:59 UTC. During this period, anyone can submit comment via comments-new-gtld-subsequent-prelim-31aug15(a)icann.org. As an advisory committee of ICANN, the ALAC submits Statements on Public Comment and advises on policy matters related to the interest of Internet users worldwide. Not just limited to the 15 ALAC members, members from the wider At-Large community are welcome to draft a Statement on behalf of the ALAC. If you are interested in drafting an ALAC Statement on this Public Comment, kindly contact staff(a)atlarge.icann.org. At-Large Staff will follow up and help you understand the procedure. Additionally, the wiki workspace for developing a potential ALAC Statement is here: https://community.icann.org/x/zIdYAw. All pertinent resources for this public comment can also be found there. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> _______________________________________________

2 1

CCWG Proposal on Enhancing ICANN Accountability - important calls this week
by Rinalia Abdul Rahim Aug. 31, 2015

Aug. 31, 2015

Dear ALAC and At-Large Community Members, [Apologies for cross-posting - subject matter is important and time sensitive] The Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) on Accountability has published its 2nd draft report, which contains its updated proposal for enhancing ICANN’s accountability as part of the IANA Stewardship Transition process. I would like to urge you to spare some time and attention to analyze the proposal and to provide the views of the At-Large community through the public comments process, which will end on Sep12th. Your views are important because the work on accountability has implications for ICANN's governance. *To be more informed on the proposal and on the response of the ICANN Board to the proposal, I recommend that you attend the following calls this week:* (1) CCWG meeting with advisors today (31 August) at 13:00 UTC. (2) CCWG briefing to the ICANN Board today (31 August) at 22:00 UTC. (3) CCWG-Board Dialogue on 2 September at 22:00 UTC (note that this is expected to be a 3 hour discussion). These calls are open and the information on how to participate via Adobe Connect is included below. *Relevant links and information* ALAC draft statement on CCWG proposal - ( https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Cross+Community+… ) ICANN call for Public Comments on the CCWG proposal – ( https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-accountability-2015-08-03-en) CCWG Accountability Wiki Page – ( https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/CCWG+on+Enhancing+ICANN+A… ) Adobe Connect links for the calls: *31 August - CCWG Meeting with Advisors* | 13:00 UTC | https://icann.adobeconnect.com/accountability/ <https://icann.adobeconnect.com/accountability/> *31 August* - *CCWG Briefing to the Board | *22:00 UTC | https://icann.adobeconnect.com/accountability/ <https://icann.adobeconnect.com/accountability/> *2 September - CCWG/Board Dialogue Call* | 22:00 - 01:00 AM/UTC | Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/dialogue/ Best regards, Rinalia Abdul Rahim

1 0

ALAC Comment on the Armenian Root Zone Label Generation Rules
by Alan Greenberg Aug. 29, 2015

Aug. 29, 2015

Following the discussion at our last ALAC meeting, I have consulted with Siranush and others (her power had failed so she could not participate in our discussion during the meeting). Siranush strongly feels that the ALAC should not submit a statement. So of the three Armenian ALSes:\ - one cannot or will not support the statement, because they are the primary author of the LGR document and also has expressed the position that comments should come from those directly involved and not the ALAC. - one also agrees that the ALAC should not submit such a statement, but it should be left to the Armenian community. - one, Narine's ALS, is the comment author. With two of the three Armenian ALSes believing that we should not take this action, I am afraid we are left with no option but to not submit this comment. I have notified Narine of this decision. The decision to not have the ALAC submit this comment is not a precedent, and since the number of ALSes with an interest in the Arabic LGRs is likely to be larger, and less well defined, I welcome thoughts on how to decide if we should submit a statement on that public comment. Alan

1 0

Board update on review of CCWG proposal
by Rinalia Abdul Rahim Aug. 28, 2015

Aug. 28, 2015

FYI. The latest update from the Board on its interactions related to the IANA stewardship transition process this week (specific to review of the CCWG proposal on enhancing ICANN accountability) and a heads up on what will happen next week: https://www.icann.org/news/blog/the-latest-update-on-the-board-s-review-of-… Rinalia

1 0

Jones Day Impact Analysis of CCWG-Accountability Second Draft Proposals
by Rinalia Abdul Rahim Aug. 28, 2015

Aug. 28, 2015

FYI. The board published the Jones Day impact analysis of the CCWG proposal. The analysis identifies gaps for the attention of the CCWG. The link is at: http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ccwg-accountability-03aug15/pdf5bBqNG… Rinalia

3 2

Board blog on CCWG Accountability
by Rinalia Abdul Rahim Aug. 27, 2015

Aug. 27, 2015

The Board issued this blog within the last 24 hours. > > https://www.icann.org/news/blog/updating-our-community-on-our-review-of-the… > Best regards, Rinalia

1 0