November 2009 - Bc-gnso - lists.icann.org

Proposed draft for IRTP-B working group
by Mike O'Connor Nov. 13, 2009

Nov. 13, 2009

hi all, Chris Chaplow, Berry Cobb and i have come up with this draft Constituency Statement for the IRTP-B working group. could you please give this a review and get any comments to me by next Wednesday? i know, not much time. but we're late on this one. that will give me time to fold your comments into the draft and recirculate it for final comments (if needed) before we submit it to the working group the following Monday. thanks! mikey On Nov 11, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Berry Cobb wrote: > Guys, > > I'm happy with the draft thus far, with just a few short comments. > > 1. Question c)....It seems the 60 day hold policy after transfer is > adopted > by some registrars and not all. I would certainly support > consistency where > possible. However on the call the other day, if there is a legitimate > domain owner wanting to transfer his domain, there should be manual > effort > driven path to support that. Case in point, is if I win a domain > through > auction or acquire a domain with a very small registrar, I may wish to > immediately transfer the domain with an organization I trust. Just a > thought. > > 1. Question d)... I am happy with this statement, the RySG > statement to > this questions does not thrill me. There should be standards applied > specifically for all registrars. > > 2. Answer to e)...shouldn't that say CBUC instead of ..... > Answer: No additions to the suggestions proposed by the IPC and the > Registries comments. > > Thank you Mikey! > > Berry A. Cobb > Infinity Portals LLC > 866.921.8891 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@haven2.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 10:55 > To: Chris Chaplow; Berry Cobb > Subject: proposed draft > > hi guys, > > for now, we'll do this the old-fashioned way. :-) > > i've banged out a draft for you to review. have a look at it and > i'll take > another pass through it, based on your comments, tomorrow. > > thanks! > > mikey > > - - - - - - - - - phone 651-647-6109 fax 866-280-2356 web www.haven2.com handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)

1 0

DRAFT BC Comments re New gTLD DAG v.3
by Mike Rodenbaugh Nov. 13, 2009

Nov. 13, 2009

Hi all, With many thanks to Ron Andruff, David Fares and Zahid Jamil for their inputs thus far, here is a DRAFT of BC comments to be submitted by the comment deadline of Nov. 22 if possible. Please indicate any objections, questions, suggested edits or adds, etc. ASAP. Thanks, Mike Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW 548 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) <http://service.ringcentral.com/ringme/callback.asp?mbid=57178438,0,&referer =http://rodenbaugh.com/contact> 738-8087 http://rodenbaugh.com <http://rodenbaugh.com/>

2 1

Charter Ballot
by BC Secretariat Nov. 13, 2009

Nov. 13, 2009

Dear Members As it's the last working day of the week, I would like to remind you that voting for the new Charter closes at midnight on Sunday. Many thanks to those members who have already voted Gary

2 1

FW: [gnso-sti] Common Grounds Paper
by Zahid Jamil Nov. 12, 2009

Nov. 12, 2009

Dear All, Please see email forwarded below. Much discussion between ALAC, NCSG reps and myself has led to some attempts at reaching common ground and the document posted. As you will see the BC position for domain transfer for a fee and the URS substantive grounds seem to have been the greatest successes. Let's see how we move ahead. IP Claims post launch is still a challenge with all other constituencies. Sincerely, Zahid Jamil Barrister-at-law Jamil & Jamil Barristers-at-law 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan Cell: +923008238230 Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025 Fax: +92 21 5655026 <http://www.jamilandjamil.com/> www.jamilandjamil.com Notice / Disclaimer This message contains confidential information and its contents are being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited. From: owner-gnso-sti(a)icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-sti@icann.org] On Behalf Of Zahid Jamil Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 9:23 PM To: gnso-sti(a)icann.org Cc: 'Margie Milam' Subject: [gnso-sti] Common Grounds Paper Dear All, With great appreciation for many of those who took part in many hours of off-line discussions and work to try and reach some common ground in anticipation of the calls this week, this Table has been prepared which outlines the areas where various parties 'seem' to agree. I have not had a chance to discuss these with Ry, Rar or IPC. This document only represents much common ground being attempted to be reached between NCSG, ALAC and BC positions based on initial discussions. The document only represents initial thinking as to ideas for reaching common ground and does not attempt to crystallize positions and has been prepared just to start discussions. Since some of us who have been working on the document in various time zones over long hours, please allow room for a few errors and feel free to point out corrections - apologies in advance. Hope this helps to drive discussion over the coming weeks. Sincerely, Zahid Jamil Barrister-at-law Jamil & Jamil Barristers-at-law 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan Cell: +923008238230 Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025 Fax: +92 21 5655026 <http://www.jamilandjamil.com/> www.jamilandjamil.com Notice / Disclaimer This message contains confidential information and its contents are being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.

15 33

FW: [council] Expressions of Interest in new gTLDs: ICANN seeks input and advice
by Mike Rodenbaugh Nov. 12, 2009

Nov. 12, 2009

Fyi a public comment period is not open on this issue, with detailed questions from Staff listed below. Given the timeline and likely differences of opinion, I am doubtful we could get consensus BC comments done in time, but if anyone cares to lead such an effort, please advise. Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW 548 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 738-8087 http://rodenbaugh.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:04 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Expressions of Interest in new gTLDs: ICANN seeks input and advice Expressions of Interest in new gTLDs: ICANN seeks input and advice http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-11nov09-en.htm 11 November 2009 ICANN is soliciting information, advice and proposed models as it considers soliciting expressions of interest in new gTLDs. The public comment forum will be open until December 11, 2009 however, community members that wish to have their input considered by the Board during its December meeting, should submit comments no later than November 27, 2009. You can access this Expressions of Interest Public Comment Forum here: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-200912.htm#eoi-new-gtl ds A call for expressions of interest in new gTLDs could provide ICANN and potential applicants important information about the level of interest in the program, which could assist in the resolution of the remaining issues and the planning for the coming new gTLD round. Receiving expressions of interest (possibly with some financial deposit) will likely contribute to a better understanding of: 1) the economic demand for new gTLDs; 2) the number of gTLDs that are likely to be requested; and 3) inform the program's operational readiness plan. The EOI path presents also some challenges as outlined below. The ICANN Board has instructed the staff to study the potential impact of a call for formal expressions of interest (EOI), and provide a plan for Board consideration at ICANN's next Board meeting, 9 December 2009. The plan should include possible options and a risk analysis relating to the proposed action. This step was the result of public forum comment in ICANN's Seoul meeting. The discussion indicates significant community interest in the potential for an EOI and that formulation of the model would benefit from expertise that can be found in the community. Comments may: .propose EOI models, and .offer support or criticism for the concept overall. The most helpful comments will provide rationale along with opinions on the following issues: 1.How do we ensure that participation in the EOI accurately represents the level of interest? 2.Should only those who participate in the EOI be eligible to participate in the first round when the program officially launches? 3.Should a deposit be required for participation in the EOI? 4.If there is a fee, under what circumstances should there be refund? 5.What information should be collected from EOI participants? 5.1 What subset of applicant questions found in the Applicant Guidebook at http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/draft-evaluation-criteria-clean-04o ct09-en.pdf should be answered? 5.2 Including applied-for strings? 5.3 Should information be made public? 6.Must the responder commit to go live within a certain time of delegation? 7.What are the implications for potential changes to the Applicant Guidebook after the EOI participation period closes? 8.What are the potential risks associated with the EOI? Related Resources: For Program details, go to: http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtld-program.htm Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

BC Position on Staff Proposals for Rights Protection Mechanism for New gTLDs
by Zahid Jamil Nov. 11, 2009

Nov. 11, 2009

Dear All, Please find attached the BC Position on Staff Proposals for Rights Protection Mechanism for New gTLDs. Staff may also deem this to constitute part of the comments with respect to the RPMs up for public comment. Sincerely, Zahid Jamil Barrister-at-law Jamil & Jamil Barristers-at-law 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan Cell: +923008238230 Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025 Fax: +92 21 5655026 <http://www.jamilandjamil.com/> www.jamilandjamil.com Notice / Disclaimer This message contains confidential information and its contents are being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.

1 0

Fw: is it OK if i have a go at a constituency statement for the IRTP working group
by BC Secretariat Nov. 11, 2009

Nov. 11, 2009

Forwarded on behalf of Mike O'Connor hi gang, my Minnesota task force stuff is done. so i can dig into ICANN a little more. would it be all right if i draft a constituency statement for the IRTP-B working group? presuming it's OK, does anybody want to join me on the drafting team? mikey - - - - - - - - - phone 651-647-6109 fax 866-280-2356 web www.haven2.com handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)

2 1

FW: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] FW: Position statement of Intellectual Property Constituency
by Mike Rodenbaugh Nov. 10, 2009

Nov. 10, 2009

Mikey, thanks for volunteering to lead a draft of comments for the IRTP-B WG. Just this morning I told the WG Chair that we would not be submitting anything at this time, as we had no volunteers despite a couple requests. But I am sure Michele and the WG will appreciate our input even if a few weeks late. Below, with attachments, is email I sent you a couple weeks ago, with background and asking you to volunteer J Thanks, Mike Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW 548 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) <http://service.ringcentral.com/ringme/callback.asp?mbid=57178438,0,&referer =http://rodenbaugh.com/contact> 738-8087 http://rodenbaugh.com <http://rodenbaugh.com/> From: Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:mike@rodenbaugh.com] Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2009 11:46 PM To: 'Berry Cobb'; 'Mike O'Connor'; chris(a)andalucia.com Subject: FW: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] FW: Position statement of Intellectual Property Constituency Gents, just seeing this stmt from the IPC, and recalling the RyC statement also. Wondering whether you have reviewed and maybe we could just support a stmt from the BC along the lines "we agree with the IPC and the RyC comments" and/or include any differences that we have? Maybe a better way forward than to ignore the call for stmts, as we have done so far, and we can get something out to the BC List to chew on, in hopes of submitting to the WG in mid Nov? Thoughts? Thanks, Mike Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW 548 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) <http://service.ringcentral.com/ringme/callback.asp?mbid=57178438,0,&referer =http://rodenbaugh.com/contact> 738-8087 http://rodenbaugh.com <http://rodenbaugh.com/> From: owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09(a)icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 8:01 AM To: Gnso-irtp-b-jun09(a)icann.org Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] FW: Position statement of Intellectual Property Constituency ------ Forwarded Message From: Anil George <avgeorge(a)nba.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:28:39 -0700 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> Subject: Fw: Position statement of Intellectual Property Constituency Marika, Here's the IPC comment. Anil _____ From: "Metalitz, Steven" [met(a)msk.com] Sent: 10/12/2009 04:53 PM MST To: <Gnso-irtp-b-jun09(a)icann.org> Cc: Anil George; <cdigangi(a)inta.org>; <Cyril.Chua(a)twobirds.com>; "David Taylor" <drd(a)lovells.com>; <jscottevans(a)yahoo.com>; "Kristina Rosette" <krosette(a)cov.com>; "Mark Bohannon" <mbohannon(a)siia.net>; "Sam Mosenkis" <smosenkis(a)ascap.com>; "Steven J. Metalitz" <met(a)msk.com>; <udecker(a)microsoft.com> Subject: Position statement of Intellectual Property Constituency Attached please find the position statement of the Intellectual Property Constituency re the questions posed regarding IRTP-B. Steve Metalitz, IPC president <<IRTP-PartB-PDP_IPC position statement 101209 (2404846).DOC>> ------ End of Forwarded Message

1 0

by Zahid Jamil Nov. 9, 2009

Nov. 9, 2009

Dear All, Here is a draft of the BC position on RPMs for review. It includes the good drafting helped by Mile R. Sincerely, Zahid Jamil Barrister-at-law Jamil & Jamil Barristers-at-law 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan Cell: +923008238230 Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025 Fax: +92 21 5655026 <http://www.jamilandjamil.com/> www.jamilandjamil.com Notice / Disclaimer This message contains confidential information and its contents are being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.

2 2

Final CCT recommendations
by Chris Chaplow Nov. 9, 2009

Nov. 9, 2009

Dear BC, Please find attached the final report of the OSC- CCT (Operations Steering Committee Communications and Coordination Team). The report has now been sent by the CCT team chair Mason Cole to the OSC chair Chuck Gomes. The next step would be for the OSC to either forward the recommendations on for full Council review (with any minor edits) or to send the recommendations back to the CCT for more work. This provides another opportunity for members of the BC to input any comments if they wish. Philip, as a member of the OSC can collect these comments. Thanks for your interest. Chris Chaplow Managing Director Andalucía.com S.L. Avenida del Carmen 9 Ed. Puertosol, Puerto Deportivo 1ª Planta, Oficina 30 Estepona, 29680 Malaga, Spain Tel: + (34) 952 897 865 Fax: + (34) 952 897 874 E-mail: <mailto:chris@andalucia.com> chris(a)andalucia.com Web: <http://www.andalucia.com/> www.andalucia.com Information about Andalucia, Spain. Please think of the Environment before you print this email

1 0