January 2017 - Bc-gnso - lists.icann.org

we have a 1-week extension of public comment period on IRP Supplemental Procedures
by Steve DelBianco Jan. 23, 2017

Jan. 23, 2017

As discussed on our last BC members call, we requested a 2 week extension on this public comment period. The IRP Implementation Oversight Team (IOR) working group granted us 1 week, since they have their own deadlines to analyze comments and prepare their final recommendations to the CCWG. This comment is now due by 1-Feb-2017. From: Karen Mulberry <karen.mulberry(a)icann.org<mailto:karen.mulberry@icann.org>> Date: Monday, January 23, 2017 at 5:01 PM To: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco(a)netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org>> Cc: BC Executive Committee <bc-excomm(a)icann.org<mailto:bc-excomm@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [Ext] Request for 2-week extension of public comment period on IRP Supplemental Procedures Steve, I wanted to confirm that the Co-Chair’s have approved a deadline extension for the IRP Public Comment period for one additional week. I hope that this will provide sufficient time for your submission. Thank you, Karen Mulberry Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives (MSSI) ICANN From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco(a)netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org>> Date: Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 7:15 PM To: Karen Mulberry <karen.mulberry(a)icann.org<mailto:karen.mulberry@icann.org>> Cc: BC Executive Committee <bc-excomm(a)icann.org<mailto:bc-excomm@icann.org>> Subject: [Ext] Request for 2-week extension of public comment period on IRP Supplemental Procedures Hi, Karen. As the staff contact for Updated Supplementary Procedures for the IRP[icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_public-2…>, we are contacting you to formally request a 2-week extension to the public comment period. The period is scheduled to end 25-Jan, and we are requesting an extension to 8-Feb, at the earliest. The justification to grant this extension is that we only just received a legal analysis and recommendations for the proposed procedures. Sidley Austin, attorneys to the CCWG, prepared a legal memo (attached) that was shared with the BC membership only last week (12-Jan). We’d like to incorporate some of Sidley’s analysis, and need additional time to have BC members review the changes. I do not see any great urgency to the adoption of IRP procedures, so I hope this request can be granted. Glad to field questions you may have about this request. Regards, Steve Vice chair for policy coordination ICANN Business Constituency

1 0

FILED: BC comment on Identifier Technology Health Indicators: Definition
by Steve DelBianco Jan. 23, 2017

Jan. 23, 2017

Today the BC filed the attached comment on Identifier Technology Health Indicators: Definition. (comment page at https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ithi-definition-2016-11-29-en ) Thanks to John Berard and Denise Michel for drafting, and to Andy Abrams and Alex Deacon for edits.

1 0

FILED: BC comment on Proposed ICANN Community Anti-Harassment Policy
by Steve DelBianco Jan. 12, 2017

Jan. 12, 2017

Today we filed the attached comment on the Proposed ICANN Community Anti-Harassment Policy. (comment page at https://www.icann.org/public-comments/anti-harassment-policy-2016-11-07-en ) Thanks to Phil Corwin, Denise Michel, and Marilyn Cade for drafting and edits.

1 0