May 2014 - Bc-gnso - lists.icann.org

FILED: Initial comment of Business Constituency (BC) on enhancing ICANN Accountability
by Steve DelBianco May 27, 2014

May 27, 2014

As we planned, today the BC filed an initial comment on Enhancing ICANN Accountability. (see overview<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/enhancing-accountability-2014-05-06-en> and this page<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/enhancing-accountability-2014-05-06-en> regarding this comment period. comments filed are here<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-enhancing-accountability-06may14/> ) Our initial comments address just the process and parameters proposed for this Working Group. Thanks to Susan Kawaguchi, Phil Corwin, and Aparna Sridhar for contributing to the draft I circulated on 21-May. The BC also intends to file substantive answers to ICANN's questions before the comment period closes on 21-Jun-2014. For that draft, I expect help from all the BC members who volunteered for this WG, including: * Marilyn Cade * Phil Corwin * Susan Kawaguchi * Claudia Selli * Mark Sloan * Aparna Sridhar * Chuck Warren From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco(a)netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org>> Date: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 at 12:14 PM To: "comments-enhancing-accountability-06may14(a)icann.org<mailto:comments-enhancing-accountability-06may14@icann.org>" <comments-enhancing-accountability-06may14(a)icann.org<mailto:comments-enhancing-accountability-06may14@icann.org>> Subject: Initial comment of Business Constituency (BC) on enhancing ICANN Accountability The ICANN Business Constituency (BC) submits the attached initial comment on Enhancing ICANN Accountability. These initial comments address just the process and parameters proposed for this Working Group. The BC also intends to file substantive answers to ICANN's questions before the comment period closes on 21-Jun-2014. - Steve DelBianco Vice chair for policy coordination ICANN Business Constituency

1 0

Fwd: [gnso-review-dt] Summary minutes and action items
by Stephane Van Gelder May 25, 2014

May 25, 2014

Colleagues, FYI Stéphane Van Gelder Chairman and Managing Director/Fondateur Milathan LTD "Internet Intelligence - Strategic Advice" T (FR): +33 (0)6 20 40 55 89 T (UK): +44 (0)7583 457053 Skype: SVANGELDER www.Milathan.com <http://www.stephanevangelder.com/> ---------------- Discover The Milathan Post on http://post.milathan.com ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Matt Ashtiani <matt.ashtiani(a)icann.org> Date: 23 May 2014 20:22 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Summary minutes and action items To: "gnso-review-dt(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-dt(a)icann.org> Dear All, Please note that the summary minutes and action items<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/48337497/Summary%20Minutes…>from yesterday's Working Party call are now posted on the wiki. The 360 Assessment Introduction<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/48337497/360%20Introductio…>has also been posted to the wiki. Regards, Matt Ashtiani Strategic Initiatives Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 USA

1 0

GNSO Review Working Party meeting - call 2
by Stephane Van Gelder May 22, 2014

May 22, 2014

Colleagues, Just to let you know that on today's GNSO Review Working Party meeting, the group mainly discussed the 360 assessment survey of the GNSO that will be done as part of the review. Topics of discussions included reviewing the draft questions, anonymous questionnaire or not?, format of the questionnaire... Please also note that there is now a wiki space dedicated to this work. You will find all the group's public documents, such as call transcripts and recordings, there. https://community.icann.org/display/GR2/GNSO+Review+2014+Working+Party+Meet… Best, Stéphane Van Gelder Chairman and Managing Director/Fondateur Milathan LTD "Internet Intelligence - Strategic Advice" T (FR): +33 (0)6 20 40 55 89 T (UK): +44 (0)7583 457053 Skype: SVANGELDER www.Milathan.com <http://www.stephanevangelder.com/> ---------------- Discover The Milathan Post on http://post.milathan.com

1 0

FILED: BC comment on Policy Advisory Boards
by Steve DelBianco May 16, 2014

May 16, 2014

Finding no objections from members by today's designated deadline, we deem the attached draft as approved. Thanks to Ron Andruff for moving quickly to draft these comments. -Steve From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco(a)netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org>> Date: Wednesday, May 7, 2014 at 7:26 PM To: BC Private <bc-private(a)icann.org<mailto:bc-private@icann.org>> Cc: Ron Andruff <ra(a)dotsportllc.com<mailto:ra@dotsportllc.com>> Subject: FOR REVIEW BY 16-MAY: BC comment on Policy Advisory Boards ICANN has a public comment period on a Proposal for the Use of Mandatory Policy Advisory Boards for Regulated Industry Sector and Consumer-Trust-Sensitive New gTLD Strings. (link<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/pab-new-gtld-strings-21mar14-en…>) At last week's BC call, Ron Andruff volunteered to draft a brief BC comment. Ron's natural for this one, since he was among the originators of this idea (link<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/pab-new-gtld-strings-21mar14-en…>). Ron's draft comment is attached. Please review and comment by 16-May. (I informed ICANN staff that we would file on 17-May, even though the comment period closes today). As for prior BC positions: See Feb-2012 BC letter to ICANN Board, where we originated the idea of having ICANN enface commitments made by new gTLD applicants. (link<http://www.bizconst.org/Positions-Statements/BC%20request%20for%20implement…>) In our Jun-2013 comment on GAC Safeguards (link), we said this about industry self-regulation regarding TLDs for regulated markets: With respect to Safeguard (4) above, the BC believes that working consultation with relevant regulatory and industry bodies, especially for the purpose of jointly developing harm mitigation strategies, will promote self- regulatory best practices that will improve consumer disclosure and protection. Also See Mar-2013 BC comment on PIC specs (link<http://www.bizconst.org/Positions-Statements/BC%20Comment%20on%20new%20gTLD…>)

1 0

FILED: BC comment on ICANN's proposed process for IANA transition
by Steve DelBianco May 9, 2014

May 9, 2014

Today we filed the attached comment on ICANN's proposed principles and process for IANA transition. During the review period, several members said they supported the comment. One member (Laura Covington) suggested we cite the NETmundial success in our appeal to open the process more. To that end, I added this to item 3: Each constituency should be allowed to name individuals to the Steering/Convening Committee, with the goal of having the same broad representation of interests that made NETmundial successful. Thanks again to Phil, Marilyn, Aparna, and Andrew for contributing to the draft. From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco(a)netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org>> Date: Monday, May 5, 2014 at 11:44 AM To: BC Private <bc-private(a)icann.org<mailto:bc-private@icann.org>> Subject: FOR REVIEW BY 8-MAY: Draft BC comment on ICANN's proposed process for IANA transition ICANN is accepting comments on their proposed principles and process for IANA transition planning. When you look at the public comment page (link<http://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/iana/transition/draft-proposal-08a…>), it's clear we are to comment only on the process and scope ICANN has proposed - not on the substantive elements or outcomes of the transition. Please be sure to read ICANN's scoping document, too (link<http://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/iana/iana-transition-scoping-08apr…>). Thanks to BC members who helped with this draft, starting with Phil Corwin, Marilyn Cade, Aparna Sridhar, and Andrew Mack. This comment is due 8-May. Our draft is just over 1 page in length, so the BC Executive Committee has approved a 3-day expedited review period. Please reply-all with your comments or in-line edits to the attached doc. If lively debate is continuing on 8-May, we will extend the BC review period and inform ICANN that we will be a few days late.

4 3

REPORTED: BC comment on ICANN's proposed process for IANA transition
by Steve DelBianco May 9, 2014

May 9, 2014

Kevin Murphy of DomainIncite quoted several excerpts from the BC comments on IANA transition. We're in good company with our suggestions. See Six ways ICANN is ballsing up the IANA transition<http://domainincite.com/16613-six-ways-icann-is-ballsing-up-the-iana-transi…> http://domainincite.com/16613-six-ways-icann-is-ballsing-up-the-iana-transi… From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco(a)netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org>> Date: Thursday, May 8, 2014 at 4:27 PM To: 'bc - GNSO list' <bc-gnso(a)icann.org<mailto:bc-gnso@icann.org>> Subject: FILED: BC comment on ICANN's proposed process for IANA transition Today we filed the attached comment on ICANN's proposed principles and process for IANA transition. During the review period, several members said they supported the comment. One member (Laura Covington) suggested we cite the NETmundial success in our appeal to open the process more. To that end, I added this to item 3: Each constituency should be allowed to name individuals to the Steering/Convening Committee, with the goal of having the same broad representation of interests that made NETmundial successful. Thanks again to Phil, Marilyn, Aparna, and Andrew for contributing to the draft. From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco(a)netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org>> Date: Monday, May 5, 2014 at 11:44 AM To: BC Private <bc-private(a)icann.org<mailto:bc-private@icann.org>> Subject: FOR REVIEW BY 8-MAY: Draft BC comment on ICANN's proposed process for IANA transition ICANN is accepting comments on their proposed principles and process for IANA transition planning. When you look at the public comment page (link<http://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/iana/transition/draft-proposal-08a…>), it's clear we are to comment only on the process and scope ICANN has proposed - not on the substantive elements or outcomes of the transition. Please be sure to read ICANN's scoping document, too (link<http://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/iana/iana-transition-scoping-08apr…>). Thanks to BC members who helped with this draft, starting with Phil Corwin, Marilyn Cade, Aparna Sridhar, and Andrew Mack. This comment is due 8-May. Our draft is just over 1 page in length, so the BC Executive Committee has approved a 3-day expedited review period. Please reply-all with your comments or in-line edits to the attached doc. If lively debate is continuing on 8-May, we will extend the BC review period and inform ICANN that we will be a few days late.

1 0