December 2012 - Bc-gnso - lists.icann.org

FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on ICANN's proposed rules for TM Matching
by Steve DelBianco 30 May '13

30 May '13

As discussed during yesterday's BC meeting in Toronto, Elisa Cooper has proposed a comment regarding ICANN's proposed plan for matching rules for names entered in the Trademark Clearinghouse. ICANN's Public Comment page for the proposed matching rules is here<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/tmch-docs-24sep12-en.htm>. The Matching Rules document we are commenting on is here<http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/trademark-clearinghouse/matching-rules-2…>. Below is the BC comment proposed by Elisa Cooper: Subject: Trademark Clearinghouse Matching Rules for “@” and “&” Upon review of the possible methods for translating “@” and “&” as described in the “Explanatory Memorandum: Implementing the Matching Rules”, the Business Constituency requests that the languages for translations of “@” and “&” be chosen on a per-record basis by the trademark owner. The memorandum suggests that the language of translations should be based upon the official language(s) of the trademark registry. Restricting translations to the official language of the trademark registry is problematic, particularly for global brands or for trademarks registered in countries where there is no official language. Furthermore, requiring that translations of “@” and “&” match the official language of the trademark registry would likely result in additional costs to brand owners for additional submissions of the same mark to the Trademark Clearinghouse. Initial comments closed 16-Oct. At least one comment (link<http://forum.icann.org/lists/tmch-docs-sep12/msg00007.html>) refers to the language restriction, so the BC could file a reply comment by the Reply closing date of 7-Nov. That gives us enough time to allow our regular 14-day review and approval period. So, please reply all with your questions or suggestions regarding this draft, before 30-Oct-2012. Steve DelBianco Vice chair for policy coordination Business Constituency

22 59

Policy calendar for 2-Oct-2012 BC member call
by Steve DelBianco 13 Jan '13

13 Jan '13

Here is the latest BC policy calendar, for use during our 2-Oct-2012 member call. Channel 1. BC participation in ICANN Public Comment process: ICANN Public Comment page is <http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment> <http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment> here<https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment><http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment> <https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment> 1. DSSA Working Group Phase 1 report (reply comments close 21-Oct) 2. SSAC report on dot-less domains (reply comments close 5-Nov) 3. TM Clearinghouse rules for matching names / verifying proof of use (initial comments close 15-Oct) 4.. Draft policy recommendations for selection of IDN ccTLDs (initial comments close 18-Oct) 5. Protection of Olympics / Red Cross names — drafting team recommendations (initial comments close 19-Oct) 6. Community input and advice process (initial comments close 25-Oct) 7. Community input on draft 2013-2016 Strategic Plan (initial comments close 13-Nov) Note: BC members are encouraged to submit individual / company comments. The BC selects topics on which to submit official positions based on member interest. --- Channel 2. Support for discussion and votes of our representatives on GNSO Council John Berard and Zahid Jamil, BC Councilors Council work sessions in Toronto on 13-Oct (agenda<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/GNSO+Working+Sessio…>) and 14-Oct (agenda<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/GNSO+Working+Sessio…>). Council meeting on 17-Oct-2012, 15:00 Eastern. Agenda not yet published; two motions<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+17+October+…> are noticed: 1. BC motion to request an Issue Report on the current state of uniformity in the mechanisms to initiate, track, and analyze policy-violation reports 2. BC motion to Initiate PDP on Uniformity of Contracts to Address Registration Abuse GNSO Project Status available <http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/pending-projects-list.pdf> <http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/pending-projects-list.pdf> here<http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/pending-projects-list.pdf> <http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/pending-projects-list.pdf> --- Channel 3. Supporting discussion/voting on matters before the Commercial Stakeholders Group (CSG) Elisa Cooper, CSG Liaison, and Marilyn Cade (alternate) Upcoming elections for GNSO Council Chair and Vice-Chair --- Channel 4. BC statements and responses during public meetings (outreach events, public forum, etc.) Non-Commercial Users Group (NCUC) is hosting a day-long ICANN policy conference on 12-Oct at Fairmont Royal York Hotel (agenda<http://www.amiando.com/NCUC-ICANN45.html?page=838202>). Phil Corwin is on a panel. Thick Whois PDP drafting team (Susan Kawaguchi, Elisa Cooper) Final report from the WG on definitions and metrics for Consumer Trust, Consumer Choice, and Competition in the new gTLD program. (Link<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/cctc/cctc-final-advice-letter-17aug12-en.pdf>) Remaining implementation work for gTLD expansion plan, incl BC requests for specific improvements (here<http://forum.icann.org/lists/newgtlds-defensive-applications/msg00022.html>). These previously-approved recommendations were discussed at US Govt meeting on 5-Sep. Implementing Affirmation review recommendations for Whois (Susan Kawaguchi, Lynn Goodendorf, Bill Smith) Implementing Affirmation review recommendations for SSR (Security, Stability, & Resilience) (Jeff Brueggeman)

1 3

Board Minutes just pubkished. Meetings Buenos Aires, Singapore, London (England)
by Chris Chaplow 24 Dec '12

24 Dec '12

Dear Members, Wishing you all the best for 2013 (and 2014) >From board minutes just published http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-20dec12-en.htm#2. a0 Resolved (2012.12.20.09), the Board accepts the proposal of the staff, and approves that the ICANN 2013 Latin America/Caribbean Meeting shall be held in Buenos Aires, Argentina from 17-21 November 2013, with a budget not to exceed US$2.37M, and that the Buenos Aires meeting be designated as ICANN's 2013 Annual General Meeting Resolved (2012.12.20.20), the Board directs the President and CEO to make the necessary arrangements to conduct the 2014 ICANN Meetings in Singapore, London (England) and a city to be identified in North America. Chris Chaplow Managing Director Andalucia.com S.L. Avenida del Carmen 9 Ed. Puertosol, Puerto Deportivo 1ª Planta, Oficina 30 Estepona, 29680 Malaga, Spain Tel: + (34) 952 897 865 Fax: + (34) 952 897 874 E-mail: <mailto:chris@andalucia.com> chris(a)andalucia.com Web: <http://www.andalucia.com/> www.andalucia.com Information about Andalucia, Spain.

1 0

New gTLD Weekly Update (21 December 2012) | ICANN New gTLDs
by Marilyn Cade 24 Dec '12

24 Dec '12

http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/announcements-and-media/announcement-21dec12-en FyI Marilyn Cade, BC Chair

1 0

Two ICANN directors update their conflicts profile
by Marilyn Cade 20 Dec '12

20 Dec '12

ABOUT ADVERTISE DI JOBS (FREE) DI PRO RSS Feed Twitter Feed RECENT POSTS Surprise! Verisign to increase .net fees Two ICANN directors update their conflicts profile after .africa complaint Amazon, Uniregistry, Verisign… here’s who won the new gTLDs lottery Santa Claus shows up to ICANN new gTLD raffle Another deadline missed in registrar contract talks ICANN drops .jobs shut-down threat Chehade kicks off massive Whois review ICM seizes on Google’s porn algorithm change Seven new gTLD applications withdrawn, two after GAC Early Warnings Deloitte confirmed as first Trademark Clearinghouse provider Ombudsman probing secretive Trademark Clearinghouse meetings New gTLD lottery tickets now on sale Van Gelder leaves NBT, goes solo with consulting biz List your job openings for free on DI Jobs Go Daddy gets its fourth CEO in a year YouPorn owner arrested in tax evasion probe Ombudsman asks DCA to simmer down after .africa conflict of interest complaint Russian iTunes Store infiltrated by .xxx banners after snafu [NSFW] .africa gTLD applicant caught using fake identity TLDH hires ICANN’s former new gTLDs head Two ICANN directors update their conflicts profile after .africa complaint Kevin Murphy, December 19, 2012, 01:40:48 (UTC), Domain Registries ICANN directors Mike Silber and Chris Disspain have updated their official statements of interest — used to identify potential conflicts on the board — after a complaint from a .africa applicant. The new SOI statement more clearly specifies the relationship between South African ccTLD policymaker ZADNA — for which Silber acts as treasurer — and Uniforum, which has applied for the .africa gTLD. It also gives a bit more information about Disspain’s employer, .au policymaker AuDA, and ARI Registry Services, which is providing the back-end registry services for dozens of new gTLD applicants. Here’s Silber’s new SOI summary, with the relevant new text highlighted: Member of the Management Committee and Treasurer of the Internet Service Providers’ Association (ISPA) South Africa. He is also, a Director and Treasurer of the .za Domain Name Authority, the ccTLD administrator for .za. The .za Domain Name Authority has concluded an arms-length operating agreement with Uniforum t/a the .za Central Registry for Uniforum to operate the .za registry. Under the agreement, Uniforum will collect and pay transaction fees to .za Domain Name Authority. Uniforum is acting as the registry service provider for various new gTLD applicants. Here’s Disspain’s, again with my emphasis: Director and CEO of .au Domain Administration Limited, the .au ccTLD manager; .au has sponsorship agreement with ICANN under which .au pays ICANN a yearly amount based on the amount of names under management. Former Officer of ICANN, Paul Levins, is a Director of .au Domain Administration Limited. .au Domain Administration Limited licenses AusRegistry Pty Ltd to run the registry for the second level names in .au. Under the Registry License agreement, AusRegistry pays fees to auDA; companies affiliated with AusRegistry are affiliated with new gTLD applications. AusRegistry is technically ARI’s parent, but they share many of the same senior executives. The updated statement comes shortly after a complaint filed with ICANN’s Ombudsman by .africa applicant DotConnectAfrica about Silber and Disspain’s alleged conflicts of interest over the gTLD. While the indirect connection between Silber and DCA’s rival .africa applicant Uniforum is clear, it was not obvious to Ombudsman Chris LaHatte what Disspain’s conflict was supposed to be. LaHatte found no actions that constituted conflicts of interest from either director, but he appeared to nudge the board to providing fuller disclosure, which is what seems to have happened here. Related posts (automatically generated): Ombudsman asks DCA to simmer down after .africa conflict of interest complaint Unbelievably, .africa will be contested Sedari working on .africa gTLD bid Tagged: .au, .za, auda, conflicts of interest, ICANN, new gTLDs, zadna ADD YOUR COMMENT Name (required) Mail (will not be published) (required) Web site (optional) Submit Comment Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting. RECENT COMMENTS mrwin: To entrust a profit seeking entity to run such an important system is not good.... read more Acro: Since the world ends in 2 days, that's pointless. :D... read more Project dotVinum: Yep, so we can see .Vin listed :-)... read more fred krueger: i would like to see the reverse analysis -- of those uncontested non-IDN apps, which ones ended up, for example, with pr... read more Jean Guillon: .RESTAURANT ? Hey Dan: Restaurant = Food = Culture = France I've had phone calls about it already.... read more Go Figure: Of the 66 geos, 30 are over 1000. In other words, about half the geos won't see the light of day until the latter half ... read more Go Figure: Overall, looks like the geos drew the longer straws. Not unexpected.... read more Domain Dan: What's all the fighting about? It's like rearranging chair on the desk of the Titanic if you ask me. Clearly, all of t... read more Tom G: killer analysis though, I can see why the DI PRO subscription could pay off.... read more Tom G: Donuts scored well with uncontested TLDs in the first couple hundred, including some IDNS.... read more © 2010-2012 TLD Research Ltd

2 1

2013 Upcoming Public Comments List
by Marilyn Cade 18 Dec '12

18 Dec '12

Please note the proposed approach regarding planning 'forecasting' of public comment issues. I might take this opportunity to mention that the BC has asked for a modification in the public comment period to provide more time on initial, a time frame for summary, and also a mechanism that allows for entities to note that they cannot meet the sort time frame on initial, and need to use Reply for their full comments. I have asked to put this topic on the Intercessional discussion with NCPH participants at end of January, but we will need your guidance, as you are all users of public comment processes at ICANN. Marilyn Cade, BC Chair From: filiz.yilmaz(a)icann.org To: soac-infoalert(a)icann.org Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 03:31:24 -0800 CC: sally.costerton(a)icann.org Subject: [Soac-infoalert] 2013 Upcoming Public Comments List Dear Community Leaders,Following the process (attached) that is now in place since June 2011 (based on the implementation of ATRT recommendation 21), it is time to ask for your input for the 2013 Upcoming Public Comments list to be published at:http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/upcoming-en.htmWe are seeking your input about topics that your groups are planning on originating a public comment period on at any time in 2013 to populate the new list, if any.Publishing and maintenance of such a list helps raising early awareness about the upcoming issues among the ICANN community. Please send these topics to Sally Costerton <sally.costerton(a)icann.org> until 31 January 2013, using template attached. Following the process, after receiving your input, the list for 2013 will be published in February 2013 and there will be another call for updates on it after the meeting in Beijing.Kind regards,Filiz YilmazSr Dir Participation and EngagementICANN _______________________________________________ soac-infoalert mailing list soac-infoalert(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-infoalert

1 0

RE: [bc-gnso] Update to the BC on SCI activities
by john＠crediblecontext.com 17 Dec '12

17 Dec '12

1 0

Update to the BC on SCI activities
by Ron Andruff 17 Dec '12

17 Dec '12

Dear colleagues, Following Wolf-Ulrich Knoben's (ISP Constituency) two years as Chair of the Standing Committee for Improvements Implementation (SCI), yours truly has been elected to the post. I have a one year term with an option to extend for a second year, at which time I become term limited and cannot continue as Chair. Avri Doria (NCUC) remains as Vice Chair, a position she held under Wolf-Ulrich's tenure. By way of background, the SCI is the only standing committee of the GNSO and it is responsible for reviewing and assessing the effective functioning of recommendations provided by the Operational Steering Committee (OSC), Policy Process Steering Committee (PPSC) and Policy Development Process Work Team (PDP-WT) during the most recent (2010) GNSO review. Recommendations to implement operational changes, and recommendations for all process changes needed to meet the requirements contained in the "Board Governance Committee GNSO Review Working Group On GNSO Improvements", which are to be implemented with approval and under the guidance of the Council, once handed down by the SCI. In simple terms, the SCI is responsible for knocking off rough edges to make sure that new policy pegs fit in their round holes. As I will be taking over the Chair of the SCI on Thursday, December 20th, I wanted to provide the BC membership with a short summary of activities the SCI has addressed and what is on the calendar for your review. This list is in 'shorthand' so please contact me directly should you have any questions or input. Open Items: 1. Suspension of a PDP: Revised language for the footnote is being discussed. No consensus on a revision but 90% complete. (Expect to finalize on our upcoming call and will report back with the specifics on the issue and its resolution as soon as this has been resolved.) 2. Working Group Survey: The survey is intended to gather feedback on improving the effectiveness and outputs of PDP Working Groups. Currently under review by the SCI members and the deadline for SCI member testing is 19 December. Staff will compile results for 20 December SCI meeting. Recent Actions: 1. Chair and Vice Chair Election: Glen (election officer) sent the ballot to the SCI members and alternates. The poll was open for one week. -- COMPLETED: Ron Andruff, Chair; Avri Doria, Vice-Chair 2. Deferral of Motions: Wolf-Ulrich will provide the results of the discussion to the GNSO Council. There is no need for a motion. -- COMPLETED: Wolf-Ulrich sent the results to the Council on 13 Dec 2012. No further action unless requested by Council. 3. Raising an Issue: SCI members agreed that the SCI will only take on issues raised by the GNSO Council, which is currently the practice. We will maintain the status quo and review this matter again in one year. -- COMPLETED: Wolf-Ulrich sent the results to the Council on 13 Dec 2012. No further action unless requested by Council. 4. Suspension of a PDP: SCI members will review the proposed revised footnote language that discusses how the community and Board will be informed of a suspension. -- UNDER DISCUSSION: No consensus yet on revised language. 5. Working Group Survey: SCI members will review the Working Group Guidelines and take the Survey (sent via a separate email) by COB Wednesday, 19 December. Julie will compile the survey results and any comments and provide an update at the meeting on 20 December. -- IN PROCESS: SCI members are requested to take the survey and provide comments. Julie will compile results for discussion on 20 December As always, if any BC members have thoughts or concerns regarding the SCI, please advise me, or our alternate rep, Angie Graves. Thank you. Kind regards, RA Ronald N. Andruff RNA Partners, Inc.

1 0

State Dept WCIT Briefing/ITR Signatories
by Phil Corwin 17 Dec '12

17 Dec '12

Here is a link to US Ambassador Terry Kramer's December 13th Press Briefing at the conclusion of the Dubai WCIT meeting -- http://www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/rm/2012/202040.htm "Number four, internet governance. In several proposals, it was clear that some administrations were seeking to insert government control over internet governance, specifically internet naming and addressing functions. We continue to believe these issues can only be legitimately handled through multi-stakeholder organizations." And here is a link to the list of the ITR signatories, as well as a map showing signing and abstaining nations - Who Signed The ITU WCIT Treaty... And Who Didn't<http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121214/14133321389/who-signed-itu-wcit-t…> - interesting to note that the next two ICANN meetings will take place in nations, China and South Africa, which are now officially on record as favoring government control over Internet governance rather than ICANN's multi-stakeholder model. Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal Virtualaw LLC 1155 F Street, NW Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20004 202-559-8597/Direct 202-559-8750/Fax 202-255-6172/cell Twitter: @VlawDC "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

1 0

RAA Negotiations Update - December 2012
by Marilyn Cade 16 Dec '12

16 Dec '12

BC Members: FYI https://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-3-14dec12-en.htmRAA Negotiations Update – December 201214 December 2012Over many months of negotiations, ICANN and the Registrars have made significant progress in negotiating the 12 recommendations from law enforcement authorities on improvements to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement. At ICANN's October 2012 meeting in Toronto, the negotiation teams described the agreements in principle on 11 of the 12 key law enforcement-recommended improvements, including the establishment of an abuse point of contact at each registrar; enhanced requirements to maintain updated information with ICANN; and robust data retention requirements. The documents posted in advance of the Toronto meeting also reflect the progress made with respect to the amendment topics proposed by the GNSO and ALAC. On one of the more complex items within the negotiations – the institution of validation and verification requirements on Whois data submitted by registrants – much progress has been made towards outlining an initial Whois verification process. However, a fundamental area of difference still remains between ICANN and the registrars, and agreement in principle has not been reached on this remaining topic.ICANN and the registrars have jointly initiated work on the development of a strawman for a Proxy/Privacy Service Provider Accreditation Program. The working team hosted a session on this topic at ICANN's Public Meeting in Toronto to start soliciting community input into what such a program should encompass.While much progress has been made on the recommendations provided by law enforcement, the GNSO and the ALAC, additional items remain for ICANN and the registrars to discuss. Both ICANN and the registrars have additional proposed changes which have not yet been negotiated. As previously discussed, it has been ICANN's position that the negotiations on key topics within the law enforcement recommendations need to come to resolution prior to concluding negotiations on these additional areas.In Toronto, ICANN's new President and CEO, Fadi Chehadé, announced to the community that the changes to the RAA are one of his top priorities, and assured the community of his focus on this work. While in Toronto, an ambitious schedule was set out for the completion of the RAA negotiations, including the posting of a proposed RAA for public comment before the end of 2012. Since the Toronto meeting, the President and CEO has been working closely with ICANN staff to gain a deeper understanding of the RAA negotiation topics. The substantial amount of work spent on the Trademark Clearinghouse for the New gTLD Program as well as the organizational work to meet the operational excellence goals has pushed the RAA negotiations into December. While the registrars and ICANN explored potential dates for negotiation in December 2012, both sides have agreed that between holidays, difficult travel schedules and the ICANN Prioritization Draw for New gTLDs, a December meeting is not feasible. Therefore, negotiations will resume in January 2013, and the anticipated date for publication of a draft RAA for community comment will be announced in January as well. ICANN thanks the registrars for their continued engagement in this negotiation process. ---------------------------------

1 0