May 2007 - At-Large - lists.icann.org

Re: [At-Large] Geographic diversity in the NARALO
by Roberto Gaetano May 20, 2007

May 20, 2007

It will take me a while to meaningfully answer to this intense message. But in the meantime I would like to make sure that the text is available to read. I doubt that Eric has posting rights in the ALAC lists, so please see the text below. I do not have myself rights to the NA-RALO mailing list, but I believe it would be interesting reading over there. Maybe somebody will forward it. This thread has started as discussion on ALAC seats for the NA-RALO. I am not advocating any "voting rights" for the native american nations (how could I anyway?), but I would find appropriate if the NA-RALO could be inclusive enough to host the voice of a set of users that are different from others in the region. Maybe the formation of an ALS would be appropriate? This would be only up to Eric, should he think it would be worthed the time and effort. Maybe some feedback from the NA community could be useful. I have not forgotten the discussion we had about .naa. Some of the whereabouts are blurred (Was it at the IETF in Chicago, 1998? Or was it Minneapolis 1999, just before the Berlin ICANN meeting? Was the third man ;>) in the discussion Dave C.?), but the message is still loud and clear. I know we live in Internet times, but some changes, that are cultural rather than technological, take times of a different order of magnitude. But will eventually happen. Cheers, Roberto > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Brunner-Williams [mailto:brunner@abenaki.wabanaki.net] > Sent: 19 May 2007 21:48 > To: Roberto Gaetano > Cc: 'John L'; 'Nick Ashton-Hart'; > alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; brunner(a)nic-naa.net; > brunner(a)abenaki.wabanaki.net > Subject: Re: [At-Large] Geographic diversity in the NARALO > > Howdy Roberto, > > The Canadian lawyer, if s/he has any opinion on Candian > Aboriginal Law, knows that Dorothy van der Peet can't sell > $50 worth of fish to a non-Indian, since the controlling law > is that "Treaty Right" is limited to whatever Indians may > have sold to Indians when the Hudson's Bay Company or the > RCMP showed up to take notes. So Indians can't own banks, use > the spectrum, or sell fish for money. Its the Smokehouse set > of cases if you're interested. > > > The American lawyer, if s/he has any opinion on Federal > Indian Law, knows that > Congress can change any treaty, and that tribes have no > jurisdiction over the > non-Indians, and a sequence of wicked interesting cases slice > the angels who > dance on the head of the jurisdictional pin for corporations, > and even Indians > from a different tribe. But the bottom line is that Indians > can't own banks, > use the spectrum, or sell fish for money significantly more > than Indians can > who live under Ottowa's rules. > > > Other than that, the difference between a Canadian and an > American Lawyer, is > somewhat theoretical, and both are certain, because ICANN > tells them so, that > Tribal governments somehow have to fit under the .ca/.us > ccTLD namespaces. > > > But your real question is are Indians, East Asians, South > Asians, Hispanics, > and Africans, sufficiently represented, for ICANN's purposes, > by the current > practice of finding some pair of lawyer, network dilatants or > retained by big, > big telecoms and/or IPR investor clients? > > The answer is no. > > > Would the answer change if the scope was limited to just > California, to just > the Native California Tribes and the Indians relocated to > California, either > by the government or by the Great Depression, to just the > Japanese, Korean, > Chinese, Vietnamese, Lao, and Thai immigrants, to just the > Indians from Mexico > and Guatemala, to just the African-Americans of LA and Oakland? > > Nope. No change. > > Elections won't change that either. The demographics of early > adoption do not > favor any change in this -- my great grandfather was the > first Cherokee to be > awarded an MD by the U. of Arkansaws, the class size was a > lot larger than 1. > My mom was the first Indian to be employed by RAND in a > technical position, > and the first Indian of any nation to hold a staff programmer > position in all > of the Department of Defense. I've run into one other Indian > in the IETF, and > none in the largest math department in North America. And > there are unmet needs > that might have something to do with ICANN -- the "digital > divide", indigenous > IPR, namespace squatting, address allocation, ... > > We're vastly outnumbered, particularly in the early-adopter > and lawyer spaces. > > I hope this helps you Roberto. Americans think that Belgians > speak something > called "Belgian", and the nuance of Flams vs Wallon vs > Bruxelles/Brussel vs > Eastern (German) is not even noticed in its absence. > > By the way, I'm leaving Nevada tomorrow to go to Tahlequah, > in the Cherokee > Nation (NE Oklahoma) to work for the reform candidate for > Principal Chief. > I'm already running her online campaign. > > Eric

2 1

Re: [At-Large] The .travel registry is likely to go out of business
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 19, 2007

May 19, 2007

I have put a query in about this situation - I will let you know what I hear. On 19/05/07, Bret Fausett <bfausett(a)internet.law.pro> wrote: > Thanks for this, John. I think Neustar provides the backend registry > for the .TRAVEL TLD. If true, I suppose the question becomes 'what > will Neustar do when it stops being paid?' > > Seems to me that given this public statement in an SEC filing, > ICANN's counsel ought to send a letter to Tralliance asking for > assurances that the company intends to continue performing. > > > Based upon our current cash resources of approximately $480 > > thousand at > > May 4, 2007, management does not believe the Company can operate > > as a > > going concern beyond May 2007. > > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org > > At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org > ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

Re: [At-Large] Geographic diversity in the NARALO
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 19, 2007

May 19, 2007

On 19/05/07, John L <johnl(a)iecc.com> wrote: > > As to your point about relative population, this could have been said > > in other regions as well. China and India could have argued this point > > in Asia, others in LAC, others still in Europe. Nobody has done so. > > Right. All of the other regions have more countries than seats. NA is > different. > How would that be different? The other regions seek to guarantee that no one country can monopolise the ALAC seats. That is what the provisions they have adopted effectively does. It would have the same effect in North America. > > English-centric. I would ask you all to consider the message that > > would be sent if North America were to adopt less diversity guarantees > > than any other region. > > No other region has language that guarantees seats to specific countries. > That's about the most anti-diversity approach I can imagine. > That's one way to interpret it. The other is that requiring different countries to be represented guarantees that BOTH countries in the region have a seat at the table. > R's, > John > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

3 2

Fwd: FYI: Whois Funnel Request: Telnic application to change its Whois service obligations
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 19, 2007

May 19, 2007

Dear Colleagues: As requested I provide you with the below. Begin forwarded message: > From: "Maria Farrell" <maria.farrell(a)icann.org> > Date: 11 May 2007 16:17:54 BDT > To: <nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org> > Subject: FW: FYI: Whois Funnel Request: Telnic application to > change its Whois service obligations > > Dear members of the At Large Advisory Committee, > > Please see below a notice I sent to the GNSO Council regarding > Whois that may be of interest to members of this committee . > > All the best, Maria > > From: Maria Farrell [mailto:maria.farrell@icann.org] > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 5:06 PM > To: 'Council GNSO' > Subject: FYI: Whois Funnel Request: Telnic application to change > its Whois service obligations > > Dear Council members, > > Please be advised that ICANN has received an application for > evaluation of new registry services regarding Whois from Telnic, > the operator of the .tel registry which is expected to launch later > in 2007. > > On 27 April, 2007, ICANN Services staff received an application > from Telnic who requested an alteration to its contract in order to > comply with the UK Data Protection Act (1998), an implementation of > the EU Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC). Telnic has not > provided notification of an investigation, litigation, regulatory > proceeding or other compliance action that might affect its > compliance with its agreement with ICANN regarding the collection, > display or distribution of personally identifiable data via Whois. > It has carried out informal consultations with stakeholders and the > UK Information Commissioner. > > This evaluation process is completely separate from the Draft ICANN > Procedure for Handling Whois Conflicts with Privacy Law (http:// > gnso.icann.org/issues/whois-privacy/ > whois_national_laws_procedure.htm) The draft Procedure was > developed by the GNSO Council in November 2005 and adopted by the > ICANN Board in May 2006. The ICANN staff developed an > implementation draft of the procedure and invited public comments > (December 2006 – January 2007) on it. The procedure will be > finalised pending any input from the Government Advisory Committee. > > > The Telnic request is at step 2.4, ‘Preliminary Determination’, of > the Registry Services Request process. (Process diagram here: > http://www.icann.org/registries/rsep/workflow.html, process policy > here; http://www.icann.org/registries/rsep/rsep.html) The process > has not identified significant security or stability issues or > competition issues that might bar the implementation of the new > registry service. > > The next step is that the service request will be posted for public > comments and sent to the ICANN Board for a decision on implementation. > > Registry Services Evaluation Process: http://www.icann.org/ > registries/rsep/ > Telnic Cover letter: http://www.icann.org/correspondence/price-to- > pritz-25apr07.pdf > Telnic Registry Request Service: http://www.icann.org/registries/ > rsep/telnic-whois-proposal-27apr07.pdf > > Best regards, Maria Farrell > > >

5 9

Re: [At-Large] ConfirmSystem: registrar@icann.org [[22ea0ce04ee114bd]]
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 19, 2007

May 19, 2007

easily dealt with. On 19/05/07, Wendy Seltzer <wendy(a)seltzer.com> wrote: > Now the anti-spam systems are spamming our lists. Lovely. > > --Wendy > > confirmsystem(a)icann.org wrote: > > Hello > > > > You have sent a message to registrar(a)icann.org, an ICANN public comment forum. > > > > In order for your message to be accepted and published, we need for you to > > acknowledge your understanding of the fact that any messages sent to any > > ICANN comment forum will be published on the web. While the archiving > > process does obscure some email addresses, any personal identifying data will > > likely also become public. > > > > You can confirm your desire to publish your message two ways: > > > > 1) Reply to this message, without altering the subject line > > (The "Re: " added by many mail clients is OK, but please note > > that this method is *not* foolproof -- there is too much variety > > in how email clients handle messages to be sure we can parse every > > reply.) > > > > or > > > > 2) Visit the URL > > <http://confirm.icann.org/?s=22ea0ce04ee114bd&l=registrar@icann.org> > > > > If you want to be very sure that your message gets through, do both steps > > above -- it does no harm to confirm more than once. > > > > For your reference, the subject of the message you sent was: > > > > "Looking for a w4tch? Visit Prest1ge Repl1cas" > > > > and it arrived at approximately Sat May 19 02:06:48 2007. > > > > Thank you for your message. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > ConfirmSystem: registrar(a)icann.org [[22ea0ce04ee114bd]] > > 2 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ALAC mailing list > > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org > > ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org > > > > > > > -- > Wendy Seltzer -- wendy(a)seltzer.org > phone: +1.617.418.3456 / +44 (0)1865 287203 // cell: 07785 550361 > Visiting Fellow, Oxford Internet Institute > Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society > http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html > http://www.chillingeffects.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org > > At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org > ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

ConfirmSystem: registrar@icann.org [[22ea0ce04ee114bd]]
by confirmsystem＠icann.org May 19, 2007

May 19, 2007

Hello You have sent a message to registrar(a)icann.org, an ICANN public comment forum. In order for your message to be accepted and published, we need for you to acknowledge your understanding of the fact that any messages sent to any ICANN comment forum will be published on the web. While the archiving process does obscure some email addresses, any personal identifying data will likely also become public. You can confirm your desire to publish your message two ways: 1) Reply to this message, without altering the subject line (The "Re: " added by many mail clients is OK, but please note that this method is *not* foolproof -- there is too much variety in how email clients handle messages to be sure we can parse every reply.) or 2) Visit the URL <http://confirm.icann.org/?s=22ea0ce04ee114bd&l=registrar@icann.org> If you want to be very sure that your message gets through, do both steps above -- it does no harm to confirm more than once. For your reference, the subject of the message you sent was: "Looking for a w4tch? Visit Prest1ge Repl1cas" and it arrived at approximately Sat May 19 02:06:48 2007. Thank you for your message. --------------------------------------------------------------- ConfirmSystem: registrar(a)icann.org [[22ea0ce04ee114bd]] 2

2 1

ConfirmSystem: registry@icann.org [[ca138951aaf02afb]]
by confirmsystem＠icann.org May 19, 2007

May 19, 2007

Hello You have sent a message to registry(a)icann.org, an ICANN public comment forum. In order for your message to be accepted and published, we need for you to acknowledge your understanding of the fact that any messages sent to any ICANN comment forum will be published on the web. While the archiving process does obscure some email addresses, any personal identifying data will likely also become public. You can confirm your desire to publish your message two ways: 1) Reply to this message, without altering the subject line (The "Re: " added by many mail clients is OK, but please note that this method is *not* foolproof -- there is too much variety in how email clients handle messages to be sure we can parse every reply.) or 2) Visit the URL <http://confirm.icann.org/?s=ca138951aaf02afb&l=registry@icann.org> If you want to be very sure that your message gets through, do both steps above -- it does no harm to confirm more than once. For your reference, the subject of the message you sent was: "Looking for a w4tch? Visit Prest1ge Repl1cas" and it arrived at approximately Sat May 19 02:06:48 2007. Thank you for your message. --------------------------------------------------------------- ConfirmSystem: registry(a)icann.org [[ca138951aaf02afb]] 1

1 0

May ALS Applications Vote Results
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 18, 2007

May 18, 2007

Dear At-Large Community: On behalf of the At-Large Advisory Committee, I'm please to report the the results of the ALS Application vote for the month of May. Note that all ALS applications in this round were approved, with the exception of: Slovenian Consumers Association (ZPS) National Consumers League These applications were not rejected, however; they will need to be the subject of another vote. The reason is that as the Bylaws of ICANN provide, at least 9 votes must be cast for an application to be accredited or not accredited. Since the total votes cast is calculated as the sum of 'Yes' and 'No' votes), and in the case of these two applications the number of abstentions was so great that only 7 actual votes were cast for Slovenian Consumers Association, and only 3 for National Consumers League, an insufficient number of votes requires a revote to be held. Those who have abstained will of course identify the information that they require in order to reach a voting position and at that point the vote will be retaken. Each candidate organisation has been separately notified of the results of the voting and provided with information relevant to their situation as per usual today. Please extend a hearty welcome to the newest members of the At-Large world! Detailed Report: May 2007 ALS Application Vote Results Report date: Fri 18 May 2007 09:18 BST No Vote Received: Annette Muehlberg Should Alberta Community Network Association (ACNA) be accredited? As at: Mon 14 May 2007 13:00 BST Number of voters: 12 Number of Votes: 11 Answer Count % of Vote Voters Yes 11 100.00 Alice Wanjira-Munyua, Izumi Aizu, Siavash Shahshahani, Vittorio Bertola, Carlos Aguirre, Jacqueline Morris, Jose Ovidio Salgueiro, Alan Greenberg, Cheryl Langdon-orr, Hawa Diakite, Mohamed El Bashir No 0 0.00 Abstain 1 Wendy Seltzer Should Association for Community Networking (AFCN) be accredited? As at: Mon 14 May 2007 13:00 BST Number of voters: 12 Number of Votes: 11 Answer Count % of Vote Voters Yes 11 100.00 Alice Wanjira-Munyua, Izumi Aizu, Siavash Shahshahani, Vittorio Bertola, Carlos Aguirre, Jacqueline Morris, Jose Ovidio Salgueiro, Alan Greenberg, Cheryl Langdon-orr, Hawa Diakite, Mohamed El Bashir No 0 0.00 Abstain 1 Wendy Seltzer Should Slovenian Consumers Association (ZPS) be accredited? As at: Mon 14 May 2007 13:00 BST Number of voters: 12 Number of Votes: 7 Vote Count % of Vote Voters Yes 7 100.00 Alice Wanjira-Munyua, Izumi Aizu, Vittorio Bertola, Jacqueline Morris, Alan Greenberg, Cheryl Langdon-orr, Mohamed El Bashir No 0 0.00 Abstain 5 Siavash Shahshahani, Carlos Aguirre, Jose Ovidio Salgueiro, Wendy Seltzer, Hawa Diakite Should Telecommunities Canada be accredited? As at: Mon 14 May 2007 13:00 BST Number of voters: 12 Number of Votes: 9 Vote Count % of Vote Voters Yes 7 77.77 Alice Wanjira-Munyua, Izumi Aizu, Vittorio Bertola, Jacqueline Morris, Jose Ovidio Salgueiro, Hawa Diakite, Mohamed El Bashir No 2 22.23 Carlos Aguirre, Alan Greenberg Abstain 3 Siavash Shahshahani, Wendy Seltzer, Cheryl Langdon-orr Should Consumers Protection Centre (KEPKA) be accredited? As at: Mon 14 May 2007 13:00 BST Number of voters: 12 Number of Votes: 9 Vote Count % of Vote Voters Yes 9 100.00 Alice Wanjira-Munyua, Izumi Aizu, Siavash Shahshahani, Vittorio Bertola, Carlos Aguirre, Jacqueline Morris, Alan Greenberg, Cheryl Langdon-orr, Hawa Diakite No 0 0.00 Abstain 3 Jose Ovidio Salgueiro, Wendy Seltzer, Mohamed El Bashir Should EFN be accredited? As at: Mon 14 May 2007 13:00 BST Number of voters: 12 Number of Votes: 11 Answer Votes % Voters Yes 11 100.00 Alice Wanjira-Munyua, Izumi Aizu, Siavash Shahshahani, Vittorio Bertola, Carlos Aguirre, Jacqueline Morris, Jose Ovidio Salgueiro, Alan Greenberg, Cheryl Langdon-orr, Hawa Diakite, Mohamed El Bashir No 0 0.00 Abstain 1 Wendy Seltzer Should National Consumers' League be accredited? As at: Mon 14 May 2007 13:00 BST Number of voters: 12 Number of Votes: 3 Answer Votes % Voters Yes 3 100.00 Siavash Shahshahani, Vittorio Bertola, Jacqueline Morris No 0 0.00 Abstain 9 Alice Wanjira-Munyua, Izumi Aizu, Carlos Aguirre, Jose Ovidio Salgueiro, Alan Greenberg, Wendy Seltzer, Cheryl Langdon-orr, Hawa Diakite, Mohamed El Bashir Should Consumer Reports Webwatch be accredited? As at: Mon 14 May 2007 13:00 BST Number of voters: 12 Number of Votes: 9 Answer Votes % Voters Yes 9 100.00 Alice Wanjira-Munyua, Izumi Aizu, Siavash Shahshahani, Vittorio Bertola, Jacqueline Morris, Alan Greenberg, Cheryl Langdon-orr, Hawa Diakite, Mohamed El Bashir No 0 0.00 Abstain 3 Carlos Aguirre, Jose Ovidio Salgueiro, Wendy Seltzer Should Internauta Brasil be accredited? As at: Mon 14 May 2007 13:00 BST Number of voters: 12 Number of Votes: 11 Answer Votes % Voters Yes 11 100.00 Alice Wanjira-Munyua, Izumi Aizu, Siavash Shahshahani, Vittorio Bertola, Carlos Aguirre, Jacqueline Morris, Jose Ovidio Salgueiro, Alan Greenberg, Cheryl Langdon-orr, Hawa Diakite, Mohamed El Bashir No 0 0.00 Abstain 1 Wendy Seltzer Should ISOC Burundi be accredited? As at: Mon 14 May 2007 13:00 BST Number of voters: 12 Number of Votes: 11 Answer Votes % Voters Yes 11 100.00 Alice Wanjira-Munyua, Izumi Aizu, Siavash Shahshahani, Vittorio Bertola, Carlos Aguirre, Jacqueline Morris, Jose Ovidio Salgueiro, Alan Greenberg, Cheryl Langdon-orr, Hawa Diakite, Mohamed El Bashir No 0 0.00 Abstain 1 Wendy Seltzer _______________________________________________ ALAC-Internal mailing list ALAC-Internal(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge- lists.icann.org ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac ALAC Official: http://alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org

2 1

Re: [At-Large] Alac liaison on security & stability advisory committee .. ?
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 18, 2007

May 18, 2007

You, Mr. Guerra, have just become Volunteer Number 1 (is in the first to volunteer in this new scheme). Congratulations :) I am sure the ALAC will have a word and get back to you. On 16/05/07, Mr. Robert Guerra <lists(a)privaterra.info> wrote: > > Nick: > > Your note raises has me ask a question. Is there an At-large liaison on the > security and stability advisory committee? If not, let me put my name > forward as a possible candidate. Data security is an area i'm involved in > and would be a pleasure to help . > > > > > regards, > > Robert > --- > Robert Guerra <rguerra(a)privaterra.org> > Managing Director, Privaterra > Tel +1 416 893 0377 > > > > > On 16-May-07, at 2:03 PM, Nick Ashton-Hart wrote: > Dear Community: > > In order to broaden the opportunities for At-Large throughout the world to > get involved in the development of policy throughout ICANN, the existing > liaisons which ALAC has appointed to the various standing bodies of ICANN is > asking for volunteers! > > Mailing lists have been established to help the existing liaisons get some > help - these are big jobs for one person to handle as they sometimes involve > participating in several different committees or working groups. > > The new mailing lists can be found below. In addition, on the ALAC wiki is a > new section to keep you up-to-date on what is going on. > Visit https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?at_large_policy_working_groups > and you will find an evolving and growing set of pages telling you what > At-Large is involved in - and how you can get involved in too! > > GNSO > Moderator & Liaison– Alan Greenberg > Email - gnso-liaison(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > URL to public page: > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-liaison_atlarge-lists.… > ALAC Wiki > Page: https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?gnso_liaison > > ICANN Board Liaison > Moderator & Liaison– Vittorio Bertola > Email - board-liaison(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > URL to public page: > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/board-liaison_atlarge-lists… > ALAC Wiki > Page: https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?icann_board_liaison > > ccNSO > Moderator & Liaison – Siavash Shahshahani > Email - ccnso-liaison(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > URL to public page: > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-liaison_atlarge-lists… > ALAC Wiki > Page: https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?ccnso_liaison > > IDN Policy Development > Moderator & Liaison – Hong Xue > Email - idn-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > URL to public page: > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg_atlarge-lists.icann.… > ALAC Wiki > Page: https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?idn_policy_formation > > WHOIS Policy > Moderator & Liaison – Wendy Seltzer > Email - whois-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > URL to public page: > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/whois-wg_atlarge-lists.ican… > Wiki Page: https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?whois_policy > > > -- > Regards, > > Nick Ashton-Hart > Director, At-Large > ICANN > PO Box 32160 > London N4 2XY > United Kingdom > Main Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011] > USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 > Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 > mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 > email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org > Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: > nashtonhart > Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart > > > > _______________________________________________ > NA-Discuss mailing list > NA-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ic… > --- > Draft MoU with ICANN: > http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU > > Draft Operating Principles: > http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP > > Draft Code of Conduct: > http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org > > www.alac.icann.org > www.icannalac.org > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

3 2

imperishable or cardiology
by Wilfredo May 18, 2007

May 18, 2007

Guys, why should you waste your time going from one grugstore to another and spend much more money for the pills? Here in our store you will find everything you desire for the really lowest prices. Our products are of the highest quality and absolutely discrete. LIve the full life, enjoy every moment of it - do not let yourself feel discomfortable http://qvpita.letrojuga.net/?18489722

1 0