September 2012 - At-Large - lists.icann.org

Redelegation of the domain representing Mali to the Agence des Technologies de l'Information et de la Communications
by Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro Feb. 4, 2014

Feb. 4, 2014

Dear All, Thanks to Dev who pointed out this morning that the Board will be considering the Redelegation of the domain representing Mali to the Agence des Technologies de l'Information et de la Communications, see: http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/agenda-03oct12-en.htm I wonder whether ISOC Mali or At Large in general holds a view on the above. Kind Regards, -- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala P.O. Box 17862 Suva Fiji Twitter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851

10 11

Re: [At-Large] [IDN-WG] [APAC-Discuss] Draft Recommendations Overall Policy for the Selection of IDN ccTLD Strings PC
by Cheryl Langdon-Orr Oct. 18, 2012

Oct. 18, 2012

works for me ... but clearly O sort of biased :-):-):-) On Sep 24, 2012 12:59 PM, "Edmon Chung" <edmon(a)isoc.hk> wrote: > After reviewing the document I think we can proceed with a simple response > commending the work and reiterating the importance of IDN IDN TLDs. > > Most of the document reiterates the recommendations from the IDNC (for the > fast track) with some additional adjustments based on the learning over the > few years of its implementation (which have actually been addressed and > updated to the latest IDN Fast Track document). > > Edmon > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: idn-wg-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: > idn-wg-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Salanieta T. > Tamanikaiwaimaro > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 12:03 PM > To: Carlton Samuels > Cc: apralo; idn-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide > Subject: Re: [IDN-WG] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] Draft Recommendations > Overall Policy for the Selection of IDN ccTLD Strings PC > > Thanks Carlton. > > If there are views from At Large on this, please let us know as > discussions are underway within the ALAC IDN Working Group via its mailing > list. > > Kind Regards, > Sala > > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Carlton Samuels < > carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Hi Sala: > > This is a question best answered by out IDN liaison. I shall be so > > advised. > > > > Best, > > - Carlton > > > > ============================== > > Carlton A Samuels > > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > > ============================= > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro < > > salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > Thank you Matt for bringing it to our attention. > > > > > > Does the ALAC need to make a statement on the Draft Recommendations > > Overall > > > Policy for the Selection of IDN ccTLD Strings PC< > > > https://community.icann.org/x/xYUoAg> is now open. > > > > > > What are people's views on the Draft Recommendations? > > > > > > Kind Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Matt Ashtiani > > > <matt.ashtiani(a)icann.org > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Edmon, > > > > > > > > I am following up on the email below. Can you please advise if you > > think > > > a > > > > Statement on this PC is necessary. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matt Ashtiani > > > > > > > > At-Large Coordination Officer > > > > > > > > ICANN > > > > > > > > 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 > > > > > > > > Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 USA > > > > > > > > From: Matt Ashtiani <matt.ashtiani(a)icann.org<mailto: > > > > matt.ashtiani(a)icann.org>> > > > > Date: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:46 PM > > > > To: Edmon Chung <edmon(a)isoc.hk<mailto:edmon@isoc.hk>> > > > > Cc: Rinalia Abdul Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim(a)gmail.com<mailto: > > > > rinalia.abdulrahim(a)gmail.com>>, "idn-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > <mailto: > > > > idn-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>" <idn-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > <mailto: > > > > idn-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond < > > ocl(a)gih.com > > > > <mailto:ocl@gih.com>>, ICANN At-Large Staff > > > > <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>> > > > > Subject: Draft Recommendations Overall Policy for the Selection of > > > > IDN ccTLD Strings PC > > > > > > > > Dear Edmon, > > > > > > > > Please note that the Draft Recommendations Overall Policy for the > > > > Selection of IDN ccTLD Strings > > > > PC<https://community.icann.org/x/xYUoAg > > > > > > > is now open. Please advise if you think a Statement on this PC is > > > necessary. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matt Ashtiani > > > > > > > > At-Large Coordination Officer > > > > > > > > ICANN > > > > > > > > 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 > > > > > > > > Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 USA > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > IDN-WG mailing list > > > > IDN-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg > > > > > > > > IDN WG Wiki: > > > https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala > > > P.O. Box 17862 > > > Suva > > > Fiji > > > > > > Twitter: @SalanietaT > > > Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro > > > Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > At-Large mailing list > > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > > > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > APAC-Discuss mailing list > > APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org > > > > > > -- > Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala > P.O. Box 17862 > Suva > Fiji > > Twitter: @SalanietaT > Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro > Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851 > _______________________________________________ > IDN-WG mailing list > IDN-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg > > IDN WG Wiki: https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy > > > _______________________________________________ > IDN-WG mailing list > IDN-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg > > IDN WG Wiki: https://st.icann.org/idn-policy/index.cgi?at_large_idn_policy >

4 4

ICANN 2012 Nominating Committee Announces Selections
by Dev Anand Teelucksingh Oct. 15, 2012

Oct. 15, 2012

Congratulations to all, but special congratulations to Alan Greenberg and to Jean-Jacques Subrenat on their nominations to the ALAC! Read announcement at : http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-30aug12-en.htm Kind Regards, Dev Anand Teelucksingh

6 6

gTLD Review Group decisions regarding the comments by IT for Change, India
by Dev Anand Teelucksingh Oct. 13, 2012

Oct. 13, 2012

Dear All, The gTLD Review Group (gTLD RG ; https://community.icann.org/x/u7-bAQ) received a comment from IT for Change, India on September 11 2012. IT for Change, India's comment was not directed at a specific application or applicant but was posted to the At-Large new gTLD Applications Dashboard at https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/multiple-strings-by-IT-for-ch… for comment. The comment by IT for Change, India is that allowing generic words as private TLDs (i.e with single registrant, with no requirement to make second level domain names available to the open market) is against the public interest. Because such a concept is outside the scope of any particular applicant or application, the gTLD RG will not be submitting a comment for the ALAC for possible submission to ICANN's new gTLD comment forum before the close of the Application Comment Period on September 26 2012. However, given the concept raised regarding generic words becoming private TLDs has policy implications that impacts individual Internet end users, the gTLD RG recommends that the issues raised be referred to the At-Large new gTLD Working Group (new gTLD WG ; https://community.icann.org/x/8Yoi) for discussion and possible policy recommendations. We note that the issues referred to the new gTLD WG from past comments received by the gTLD RG (https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.book+_OG) have been added to the new gTLD WG's agenda. Kind Regards, Dev Anand Teelucksingh Chair, gTLD Review Group

9 21

ELECTION CALL for ALAC Officers to serve from 22 October 2012 to ICANN AGM 2013
by Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Oct. 8, 2012

Oct. 8, 2012

Dear All, According to Rule 2.1 of the ALAC Internal Rules of Procedure <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/27854147/AL-2007-1-1-Rev11…> the ALAC will elect a Chair, at least two (2) Vice-Chairs and a Rapporteur. Rule. 2.2 states that all officers are normally elected at an Annual General Meeting of ICANN. Rule 9.1 states that the election call will be sent by the current ALAC Chair. In keeping with these rules, this message serves as the election call for the ALAC Officers to serve as members of the ALAC Executive Committee from 22 October 2012 to the ICANN Annual General Meeting 2013. The election schedule is as follows: *_Election Schedule_* *_ _* * 17 September 2012 Election Call /(sent to lists.)/ * 1 October 2012 Deadline for Officer Nominations /(to be sent to lists.)/ * 3 October 2012 Chair to post to the public ALAC list an "election summary" message /(sent to lists.)/ * 4-11 October 2012 Nominations are discussed * 8 October 2012 Deadline for Nominees to Accept their Nomination /(sent to lists and or as notified and recorded on the relevant Election Pages of the At-Large Wiki.)/ * 14 October 2012 Start of AGM * 18 October 2012 Closure of AGM * 18 October 2012 Start of Election of ALAC Officers by 2013 ALAC immediately after the closure of the AGM (Should a ballot be required) * 22 October 2012 Election Results announced * 22 October 2012 New ALAC Officers take their seats Please note that according to two motions of the ALAC, which were adopted during the 25 November 2008 ALAC Meeting, the ALAC Officers consisting of a Chair, two Vice-Chairs, and a Rapporteur shall represent different ICANN Geographic Regions. A 2012-2013 ALAC Officer Election wiki page <https://community.icann.org/x/pocoAg> has been created that includes the following: * The election schedule as above; * An election schedule with the Rules of Procedure explanations; * ALAC officer criteria; and * Nominations for ALAC officers. Warm regards, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond ALAC Chair

14 26

A Giant Step Backward or the Way Forward
by Derek Smythe Oct. 8, 2012

Oct. 8, 2012

"A Giant Step Backward or the Way Forward An Analysis of some Proposals before WCIT" http://lirneasia.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Samarajiva-WCIT-Final_9.12.… > Executive Summary > In December, the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) will convene the 2012 > World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT-12) in Dubai, United Arab > Emirates, for the purpose of revising the International Telecommunication Regulations > (ITRs) that govern the way nations handle telecommunications network traffic as it crosses > their borders. Among the most troubling proposals submitted to the ITU’s Council Working > Group to prepare for WCIT-12 are the contribution from European Telecommunications > Network Operators Association (ETNO) and the Africa Region contribution submitted by > Egypt. > ETNO wants the ITU to designate Internet content providers as “call originators” and > subject them to a “sending party network pays” rule that would allow telecommunications > operators to charge them rates they believe are commensurate with the bandwidth their > content consumes. > Such a change would have enormous implications for the expansion of the digital economy > in the developing world. ...

2 2

Re: [At-Large] ICANN News Alert -- Update on Registrar Accreditation Agreement Amendments
by "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" Sept. 28, 2012

Sept. 28, 2012

On 26 Sep 2012, at 06:17, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> wrote: > At 26/09/2012 12:47 AM, John R. Levine wrote: >>> It is almost impossible these days to sign onto a mailing list or get >>> a free id on some web site without clicking on a link in an e-mail. >>> Yet apparently, you can register a domain name without such a nicety. >> >> Quite right. Mail verification is a solved problem. >> >>> Phone verification is a lot more costly, >> >> I'm not sure I believe that. I use a variety of services that verify >> transactions by calling my phone number and speaking a code number I have >> to type into their web site. Given how low value some of the transactions >> are, they can't be spending much on their IVR system. > > Good point. Still more costly than nothing, especially for a smaller > registrar with a low volume, and also for those who handle > out-of-country registrations. But by more expensive, I suspect we are > still talking pennies in most cases. No - it's quite a lot more. Stuart Lawley gave some numbers which I think were in the region of $7 / domain. You can probably do it for a lower price if you are only dealing with your home market, but the internet is global .. While this might not be an issue if you are in North America and only want to deal with big North American registrars, it becomes a problem when you move outside that .. As you all know there are several regions of the world that are not particularly well served in terms of registrars etc., If ICANN / LEA push the phone verification too far then they'll be widening the digital divide .. > > >>> Hopefully going forward, we will not make these kind of mistakes >>> again. >> >> My, you're an optimist. > > Not really. Just trying to put a good twist on a very sad story. And > I kinda like the concept of moving forward and making NEW stupid mistakes... > > Alan > > >> R's, >> John >> _______________________________________________ >> At-Large mailing list >> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >> >> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions ♞ Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection ICANN Accredited Registrar http://www.blacknight.co http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://blacknight.cat http://mneylon.tel Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 US: 213-233-1612 Locall: 1850 929 929 Facebook: http://fb.me/blacknight Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845

4 3

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten Sept. 28, 2012

Sept. 28, 2012

Total of 78 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Sep 28 00:53:04 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 16.67% | 13 | 63.50% | 1618056 | salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com 24.36% | 19 | 20.89% | 532277 | carlton.samuels at gmail.com 7.69% | 6 | 1.72% | 43741 | evan at telly.org 6.41% | 5 | 1.79% | 45566 | parminder at itforchange.net 6.41% | 5 | 1.78% | 45261 | michele at blacknight.ie 5.13% | 4 | 1.42% | 36121 | alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca 5.13% | 4 | 1.11% | 28225 | johnl at iecc.com 3.85% | 3 | 1.23% | 31259 | avri at acm.org 2.56% | 2 | 0.80% | 20491 | vanda at uol.com.br 2.56% | 2 | 0.76% | 19382 | hawadiakite at gmail.com 2.56% | 2 | 0.76% | 19355 | langdonorr at gmail.com 2.56% | 2 | 0.66% | 16942 | eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com 1.28% | 1 | 0.56% | 14229 | icann-list at sorehands.com 1.28% | 1 | 0.35% | 8991 | narten at us.ibm.com 1.28% | 1 | 0.34% | 8706 | hongxueipr at gmail.com 1.28% | 1 | 0.34% | 8629 | dralialmeshal at gmail.com 1.28% | 1 | 0.33% | 8414 | ocl at gih.com 1.28% | 1 | 0.31% | 7958 | ajp at glocom.ac.jp 1.28% | 1 | 0.30% | 7580 | rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com 1.28% | 1 | 0.29% | 7439 | derek at aa419.org 1.28% | 1 | 0.28% | 7172 | admin at ttcsweb.org 1.28% | 1 | 0.25% | 6403 | franck.martin at gmail.com 1.28% | 1 | 0.23% | 5864 | joly at punkcast.com --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 78 |100.00% | 2548061 | Total

1 0

Re: [At-Large] [WHOIS-WG] Article 29 Party To ICANN
by "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" Sept. 27, 2012

Sept. 27, 2012

On 28 Sep 2012, at 00:04, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for posting this Michele. Mildly interesting development. mildly? Seriously?? I > > For one, These Article 29 fellas are behind the curve on the changes in ICANN leadership I fail to see how any change in ICANN leadership is relevant to their letter > . For I'm sure Fadi Chehade's ascension to CEO was announced almost 2 weeks before their note, dated 26th September here. Anyhoo, makes for a perfect takeoff point. > > So now, the Article 29 fellas object to annual - yes, annual - verification of email and phone numbers of registrants. But not before they groused that the original purpose of the WHOIS was recorded as to facilitate contact on 'technical' issues! And any other use is, ipso facto, at least unsporting, if not illegal. Yes - they're right You may not like it, but that's what whois was originally designed to do > > We are back in time. > > Here's another telling observation. They feel the 'root cause' for inaccurate WHOIS data is 'the unlimited public accessibility of private contact details in the WHOIS database'! Yes and I'd agree. As a registrar we get a lot of our clients complaining about their details being made available in public whois > > Well.... um.....let me tell you a story. Back in the day when you go to Disneyland - the one in California - they had a target shooting game out front. When you missed, an old cowboy image would up and chortle 'lock up the wimmin' and chil'ren, Ol' Cockeye's got a gun'. This position does nothing but give comfort and succor to the common crooks now plaguing us. > > Mind you, I could get mildly stimulated by the reasoning they used to deplore the requirement for data retention for 2 years after a contract has expired. Yes, that is excessive and unwarranted. And that is the only positive thing I can say with good grace. > > It is always intriguing to me that those who argue for unfettered privacy rights for registrants always conflate and make indivisible the interests of registrants with those of ordinary users. And quite apart from the fact that the Article 29 folks seem to submerge the interests of all 2+billion worldwide Internet users to those of registrants who are EU citizens - or, maybe, the 20% or so of Internet users who are EU citizens - I'm wondering whether they were party to the Safe Harbour protocols? Maybe Madame forgot their invitation to the last hi-level conference in DC? I think you're confusing things Have a read over what ICANN / LEA is asking Have a look at PCI / DSS Have a proper read over the Article 29 letter > > Then again, I might change my mind when I see what they make of the CleanIT project. Clean IT's proposals are insane > > - Carlton > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround > ============================= > > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:54 PM, "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele(a)blacknight.ie> wrote: > http://www.internetnews.me/2012/09/27/article-29-working-party-deem-raa-ask… > > > -- > Mr Michele Neylon > Blacknight Solutions > Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection > http://www.blacknight.com/ > http://www.dotwhat.co/ > http://blog.blacknight.com/ > http://mneylon.tel/ > Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 > Locall: 1850 929 929 > Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 > Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon > ------------------------------- > Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty > Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845 > > > _______________________________________________ > WHOIS-WG mailing list > WHOIS-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/whois-wg > > WHOIS WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Whois+Policy > -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection http://www.blacknight.com/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://mneylon.tel/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Locall: 1850 929 929 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763 Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845

1 0

Re: [At-Large] [WHOIS-WG] Article 29 Party To ICANN
by Carlton Samuels Sept. 27, 2012

Sept. 27, 2012

Thanks for posting this Michele. Mildly interesting development. For one, These Article 29 fellas are behind the curve on the changes in ICANN leadership. For I'm sure Fadi Chehade's ascension to CEO was announced almost 2 weeks before their note, dated 26th September here. Anyhoo, makes for a perfect takeoff point. So now, the Article 29 fellas object to annual - yes, annual - verification of email and phone numbers of registrants. But not before they groused that the original purpose of the WHOIS was recorded as to facilitate contact on 'technical' issues! And any other use is, ipso facto, at least unsporting, if not illegal. We are back in time. Here's another telling observation. They feel the 'root cause' for inaccurate WHOIS data is 'the unlimited public accessibility of private contact details in the WHOIS database'! Well.... um.....let me tell you a story. Back in the day when you go to Disneyland - the one in California - they had a target shooting game out front. When you missed, an old cowboy image would up and chortle '*lock up the wimmin' and chil'ren, Ol' Cockeye's got a gun*'. This position does nothing but give comfort and succor to the common crooks now plaguing us. Mind you, I could get mildly stimulated by the reasoning they used to deplore the requirement for data retention for 2 years after a contract has expired. Yes, that is excessive and unwarranted. And that is the only positive thing I can say with good grace. It is always intriguing to me that those who argue for unfettered privacy rights for registrants always conflate and make indivisible the interests of registrants with those of ordinary users. And quite apart from the fact that the Article 29 folks seem to submerge the interests of all 2+billion worldwide Internet users to those of registrants who are EU citizens - or, maybe, the 20% or so of Internet users who are EU citizens - I'm wondering whether they were party to the Safe Harbour protocols? Maybe Madame forgot their invitation to the last hi-level conference in DC? Then again, I might change my mind when I see what they make of the CleanIT project. - Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:54 PM, "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" < michele(a)blacknight.ie> wrote: > > http://www.internetnews.me/2012/09/27/article-29-working-party-deem-raa-ask… > > > -- > Mr Michele Neylon > Blacknight Solutions > Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection > http://www.blacknight.com/ > http://www.dotwhat.co/ > http://blog.blacknight.com/ > http://mneylon.tel/ > Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 > Locall: 1850 929 929 > Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 > Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon > ------------------------------- > Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty > Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845 > > > _______________________________________________ > WHOIS-WG mailing list > WHOIS-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/whois-wg > > WHOIS WG Wiki: > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Whois+Policy >

1 0