March 2008 - At-Large - lists.icann.org

ALAC Draft Accountability Framework and Conflicts of Interest Policy
by Nick Ashton-Hart April 15, 2008

April 15, 2008

Dear Community members: The ALAC decided at their last meeting to request the staff to draft up a comprehensive Accountability Framework, which the ALAC Executive Committee was to review and amend at its meeting this month. The Chair proposed to the ExComm that at the same time a Conflicts of Interest Policy should be prepared as this was a natural accompaniment to the Accountability Framework. he ExComm has reviewed these two texts, and the ALAC is now to review the draft from 1 April until 11th April - comments from the wider At-Large community are of course welcomed. Any comments received are then to be incorporated and the resulting text will be on the agenda for adoption at the next ALAC Teleconference, in May. The URL for the text is as follows. In order to save bandwidth for those who do not have broadband, the text has not been attached to this message: https://st.icann.org/data/workspaces/alac/attachments/8_april_2008:20080331… French and Spanish translation will be available once they are ready. -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director for At-Large Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68 email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

14 24

Election for a Vice-Chair - Nominations Periods ends 2 April
by At-Large Staff April 6, 2008

April 6, 2008

Dear Community: This email is to remind you of the formal Election Call¹ issued by the Chair of the ALAC on 19th March, as required by Rule 10.12 of the Rules of Procedure of the ALAC due to a vacancy amongst the Officers of the ALAC. The 14-day nomination period, as provided by Rule 9.2, will end on 2nd April. All nominations must, per that Rule, be received on the ALAC public list at alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org not later than 14 days. I can confirm that to date, no nomincations have been made. Nominations may be made as provided in Rule 9. The Criteria for Officers of the ALAC may be found in Rule 3. Election of Officers is covered by Rules 2, 9, and 10 NOTE: The Election Procedures make clear reference to it being necessary for part of the process to be conducted at an ICANN International Meeting. These provisions are designed to fill regular appointments, and not interim appointments. The Chair intends to present relevant amendments to the Rules of Procedure at the next ALAC Telephonic meeting in April to allow for interim elections to be conducted without the necessity of waiting for the next ICANN International Meeting. The full Rules of Procedure may be found at: https://st.icann.org/data/workspaces/alac/attachments/rules_of_procedure:200 71023183147-0-6223/files/ALAC%20ROP's%20Adopted%20October%202007.doc The Rules above referenced are reproduced below. Rule 2 - Election of Officers 2.1 The ALAC shall elect a Chair, at least two (2) Vice-Chairs and a Rapporteur by the mechanism outlined in Rule 10. 2.2 All officers are normally elected at an Annual General Meeting of ICANN . 2.3 The election can take place by electronic mail, online balloting, written balloting, or any other means deemed convenient and accurate 2.4 All officers serve for a term of one year starting from the closure of an AGM and ending at the closure of the following AGM. 2.5 Officers shall be freely chosen by the ALAC, according to the following criteria: 2.6 They shall accept to serve on behalf of the AT LARGE COMMUNITY by acting for the good of the entire Committee, working to bridge differences and build consensus, but also recognizing difference and enabling different opinions to be shared; 2.7 They shall accept, while acting in their capacity as ALAC officer, to put the collective views of the Committee always in front of their own. Rule 3 - Qualification Criteria for Officers 3.1 All officers must be members of the ALAC. 3.2 A conflict of interest statement must be filed; 3.3 A person shall not serve, at the same time, in two different officer positions; 3.4 The Chair shall be ineligible to serve on ICANN's Nominating Committee in any year in which they serve on the ALAC; 3.5 All officers can be removed before the end of their term by a vote of recall according to rule 11. 3.6 All officers have a duty of performing their roles with diligence and loyalty to the Committee, and are bound to meet the minimum participation requirements set forth in rule 21. In case of failure to do so, the Chair shall call a vote of recall. 3.7 Only standing members of the At-Large Advisory Committee are eligible to serve as Chair. If at any point in time the Chair leaves the membership of the ALAC for any reason, he / she shall immediately cease the function of Chair as well. Rule -9 Procedures for the Presentation of Candidatures 9.1 No earlier than one calendar month and no later than three weeks before the beginning of an ICANN Meeting where an ALAC officer has to be elected, the current Chair of the ALAC will send to the public ALAC list an ³election call² message, listing the officers that are to be elected at that ICANN Meeting, asking for nominations, and stating the deadline according to the following paragraph 9.2. 9.2 The deadline for nominations for all open officer positions shall be 14 (fourteen) days after the date of the ³election call². Only delegates can nominate or self-nominate, by posting a message to the public ALAC list. Anyone who will or has a chance to meet eligibility requirements after the next ICANN Annual General Meeting can be nominated; it is not necessary for nominees to meet eligibility requirements at the moment of the nomination, but, if elected, they will have to meet them before taking their position. Nominations of individuals who certainly will not be able to meet the eligibility requirements after the closure of the next Annual General Meeting are invalid. 9.3 Nominations must be accepted by the nominee by sending a message of acceptance to the public ALAC list (or to the person who nominated them, who will then forward it to the public ALAC list, if they do not have posting privileges to the public ALAC list at the time) by the deadline of 7 (seven) days after the deadline for nominations. Nominations that are not accepted are invalid. 9.4 After the deadline for nomination acceptance and before the beginning of the ICANN Meeting, the Chair will post to the public ALAC list an ³election summary² message. This message will contain a summary of all valid nominations for any open position. In such message, the Chair will also notify the day and time in which the actual vote will happen; such day and time must be comprised between the beginning and the closure of the ICANN Meeting, except when the Meeting is also the Annual General Meeting. In this latter case, the day and time of the vote must be comprised in the first 48 (forty-eight) hours after the closure of the Annual General Meeting; thus, the electorate will include the delegates whose term starts at the closure of that Annual General Meeting, and will not include the former ALAC members whose term ends at the closure of that Annual General Meeting. 9.5 Nominations shall then be discussed on the public ALAC list and at the physical ALAC meetings during the ICANN Meeting. 9.6 At the day and time of the vote, delegates will be provided (by staff or delegated disinterested third party) with a mechanism for voting that meets the following requirements: o It allows for each delegate to cast their vote in a confidential manner, so that no other delegate or officer shall know it; o It allows for delegates who are not physically present to cast their vote remotely (also in advance of the day and time of the vote, if they are unavailable at that moment o Each delegate can cast up to one preference for each open position, picking among the list of validly nominated individuals published at rule 9.4. Votes for other individuals are considered equivalent to abstention. Rule 10. Procedures for the Candidate Elections 10.1 A quorum must exist for the election to be valid. 10.2 All Voting in Elections will be CONFIDENTIAL 10.3 The ALAC can designate an independent third party to conduct the mechanics of an electoral vote. 10.4 Instant-runoff voting <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting> (IRV) will be used as the voting system to determine the winner. (ref - Wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting> ) 10.5 Voters rank candidates in order of preference. 10.6 If no candidate receives an overall majority of first preferences the candidates with fewest votes are eliminated one by one, and their votes transferred according to their second and third preferences (and so on), until one candidate achieves a majority. 10.7 After votes have been collected, a disinterested person¹ will examine them and call the result. 10.8 The newly elected officers assume their position at the closure of the Annual General Meeting. 10.9 In case two or more candidates receive the same, highest number of preferences, a tiebreak vote is to be conducted. 10.9.1 The Chair will select a new date and time for a new vote on that position, at least 7 (seven) days later than the current vote; in such vote, only the candidates that received the same, highest number of preferences will be eligible to receive preferences. The Chair will then immediately send a new ³election summary² message according to rule 9.4, and the procedure will then restart from rule 9.5 10.10 In case no candidate could be elected for any other reason (lack of valid nominations, lack of five valid preferences...), the Chair will immediately post a new ³election call², thus reopening nominations. The procedure will then restart from rule 9.6 10.11 Incumbent officers shall continue to serve in their position in full standing until a valid result is obtained for the election and a new officer is elected. 10.12 If for any reason whatsoever (including lack of quorum, lack or loss of eligibility requirements, resignation, or recall) an officer position becomes vacant before the end of the term, the Chair will promptly start an election to fill it, by sending an ³election call² message and starting the procedure from rule 9.1 -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director for At-Large Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68 email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

5 4

Re: [At-Large] FW: WIPO: DNS Developments Feed Growing Cybersquatting Concerns
by Jeffrey A. Williams March 31, 2008

March 31, 2008

Danny and all, I can't say for a certantity what ICANN Bod and staff members do on a day to day basis, but it is clear that whatever they are doing is not addressing the issues that they are very well aware of in any effective manner, and haven't been for a number of years now, if ever. Such represents a failure of mission due to a lack of competant leadership IMO. I am not a fan of WIPO, and never have been nor will ever likely ever be, but Francis is correct in his evaluation none the less. Yet WIPO also is nearly as bad as they haven't addressed effectively a number of IP related issues facing their organization either and seemingly are refusing to do so. Pot, kettle black, IMO. However like most UN organisations, but not all, WIPO does alot of debate, discuss, and contemplation, but actually does very little, and manages to accomplish irritating many. However as the RIAA and MPAA are WIPO active members, this sort of behavior is not all that surprising... -----Original Message----- >From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger(a)yahoo.com> >Sent: Mar 31, 2008 8:38 AM >To: At-Large Worldwide <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >Subject: [At-Large] FW: WIPO: DNS Developments Feed Growing Cybersquatting Concerns > >If you take a look at last year's correspondence from >WIPO to ICANN, you'll note the same set of unresolved >complaints regarding registrars, namely: > >non-compliant registration provisions, the failure to >provide complete or correct registration information, >simple uncontactability, 'cyberflight'-related or >other modifications to registrant data after a >complaint is filed, and failure to properly implement >transfer decisions. > >Francis Gurry also wrote: "WIPO has informed ICANN of >many such instances and will shortly provide a fuller >overview of these practices, which call for >independent and active oversight." > >See >http://www.icann.org/correspondence/gurry-to-twomey-04jul07.pdf > >What has been ICANN's response to this situation? >Have we seen any efforts to clean up the problems? I >haven't; and obviously WIPO hasn't seen any progress >either. > >Perhaps we can take up these issues with Stacey >Burnette at the upcoming NARALO teleconference... I'm >sure there's a legitimate reason why ICANN continues >to do little-to-nothing to address valid complaints :( > > > > Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

1 0

Minutes and Action Items from 31 March 2008 Finance and Budget Subcommittee meeting
by At-Large Staff March 31, 2008

March 31, 2008

Dear Finance and Budget Subcommittee Members: The Minutes and Action Items related to the above-referenced meeting today may be found below. The URL from which these are available is: https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?31_march_2008. Note that updated documents as per the schedule will shortly be made available to committee members. Community review of both draft statements will begin on 6th April and conclude on 16th April. Non-Members are reminded that the meeting minutes and action items are not official¹ until adopted by the Subcommittee during its next teleconference, scheduled for 18th April 2008. -- Regards, ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org

1 0

FW: WIPO: DNS Developments Feed Growing Cybersquatting Concerns
by Danny Younger March 31, 2008

March 31, 2008

If you take a look at last year's correspondence from WIPO to ICANN, you'll note the same set of unresolved complaints regarding registrars, namely: non-compliant registration provisions, the failure to provide complete or correct registration information, simple uncontactability, 'cyberflight'-related or other modifications to registrant data after a complaint is filed, and failure to properly implement transfer decisions. Francis Gurry also wrote: "WIPO has informed ICANN of many such instances and will shortly provide a fuller overview of these practices, which call for independent and active oversight." See http://www.icann.org/correspondence/gurry-to-twomey-04jul07.pdf What has been ICANN's response to this situation? Have we seen any efforts to clean up the problems? I haven't; and obviously WIPO hasn't seen any progress either. Perhaps we can take up these issues with Stacey Burnette at the upcoming NARALO teleconference... I'm sure there's a legitimate reason why ICANN continues to do little-to-nothing to address valid complaints :( ____________________________________________________________________________________ You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com

1 0

Re: [At-Large] FW: WIPO: DNS Developments Feed Growing Cybersquatting Concerns
by Jeffrey A. Williams March 31, 2008

March 31, 2008

Beau and all, Thanks. I was just getting ready to forward this myself, as I just read it. Well done. Yet again, and now for a number of years this clearly points out that ICANN is either unwilling, or unable to take full reaponsibility of it's mission as well as it's obligations under the MOU. And this is just one of many examples... -----Original Message----- >From: "Brendler, Beau" <Brenbe(a)consumer.org> >Sent: Mar 31, 2008 7:23 AM >To: At-Large Worldwide <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >Subject: [At-Large] FW: WIPO: DNS Developments Feed Growing Cybersquatting Concerns > >FYI if you haven't seen it already > >________________________________ > >From: Anne-Catherine Lorrain [mailto:aclorrain@consint.org] >Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 9:17 AM >To: ip(a)tacd.org; infosoc(a)tacd.org >Subject: WIPO: DNS Developments Feed Growing Cybersquatting Concerns > > >WIPO has released its report on the domain name registration system >(DNS) for 2008. > >http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2008/article_0015.html > >Against the background of an unprecedented number of cybersquatting >cases in 2007, the evolving nature of the domain name registration >system (DNS) is causing growing concern for trademark owners around the >world. Last year, a record 2,156 complaints alleging cybersquatting - or >the abusive registration of trademarks on the Internet - were filed with >the World Intellectual Property Organization's (WIPO) Arbitration and >Mediation Center (Center), representing an 18% increase over 2006 and a >48% increase over 2005 in the number of generic and country code Top >Level Domain (gTLDs and ccTLDs) disputes. > >"These increases confirm that 'cybersquatting' remains a significant >issue for rights holders," said Mr. Francis Gurry, WIPO Deputy Director >General, who oversees WIPO's dispute resolution work, noting that a >number of developments in the DNS are also cause for concern from the >perspective of intellectual property holders, as well as Internet users >generally. Among these, use of privacy services to shield abusive >registrations and the evolving role of certain domain name registrars, >together with the ongoing trademark abuse reflected in WIPO's caseload, >raise concerns about the introduction of a number of new gTLDs announced >for late 2008. > > > >*** >Scanned > >_______________________________________________ >ALAC mailing list >ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

1 0

FW: WIPO: DNS Developments Feed Growing Cybersquatting Concerns
by Brendler, Beau March 31, 2008

March 31, 2008

FYI if you haven't seen it already ________________________________ From: Anne-Catherine Lorrain [mailto:aclorrain@consint.org] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 9:17 AM To: ip(a)tacd.org; infosoc(a)tacd.org Subject: WIPO: DNS Developments Feed Growing Cybersquatting Concerns WIPO has released its report on the domain name registration system (DNS) for 2008. http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2008/article_0015.html Against the background of an unprecedented number of cybersquatting cases in 2007, the evolving nature of the domain name registration system (DNS) is causing growing concern for trademark owners around the world. Last year, a record 2,156 complaints alleging cybersquatting - or the abusive registration of trademarks on the Internet - were filed with the World Intellectual Property Organization's (WIPO) Arbitration and Mediation Center (Center), representing an 18% increase over 2006 and a 48% increase over 2005 in the number of generic and country code Top Level Domain (gTLDs and ccTLDs) disputes. "These increases confirm that 'cybersquatting' remains a significant issue for rights holders," said Mr. Francis Gurry, WIPO Deputy Director General, who oversees WIPO's dispute resolution work, noting that a number of developments in the DNS are also cause for concern from the perspective of intellectual property holders, as well as Internet users generally. Among these, use of privacy services to shield abusive registrations and the evolving role of certain domain name registrars, together with the ongoing trademark abuse reflected in WIPO's caseload, raise concerns about the introduction of a number of new gTLDs announced for late 2008. *** Scanned

1 0

Re: [At-Large] Contacting ICANN
by Jeffrey A. Williams March 30, 2008

March 30, 2008

Danny and all, Maybe we should be copying these complaints directly to DOC/NTIA so as to raise awarness/concern as to the lack of addressing them by the ICANN staff so that than maybe ICANN will be under a more direct oversite by DOC/NTIA as in accordance with the MOU? It's clear that some oversite is necessary along with some adult supervision. I only would hope that DOC/NTIA is up to the task... A failure of good open and transparent communication, is a demonstration of failing or poor leadership. Danny Younger wrote: > Hello Kieren, > > When a member of the public writes that "I have > emailed the webmaster a few times about this > matter, but as with all emails to the webmaster on any > subject, I have never received a reply", then this > clearly points to a problem. > > Someone that serves in the capacity of Manager of > Public Participation might indeed wish to look into > why a member of ICANN Staff (the webmaster) appears to > be routinely ignoring messages from the public. > > and as to the non-answer that you provided to Dale, I > think you could have done much better... > > The WDPRS handles over 100,000 complaints monthly. If > there is a problem with system-generated follow-ups as > he has indicated, then this is a major concern. > > ...perhaps you'll get around to actually looking into > the problem at some point. > > regards, > Danny > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > _ Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

1 0

PacINET 2008 Call for Papers
by Franck Martin March 29, 2008

March 29, 2008

Please pass this e-mail to interested parties. PacINET is the largest regional INET, and the first ICT conference for the Pacific Islands. It is organised by the Pacific Islands Chapter of the Internet Society (PICISOC). http://www.picisoc.org/tiki-index.php?page=PacINET+2008#Call_for_Papers PacINET 2008 Call for Papers The theme for the conference is *ICT for Quality of Life* The PacINET conference is composed of several types of contributions including Paper Presentations, Demonstrations, Tutorials and Workshops, Panel Discussions and Invited Talks. Non-technical presentations may also be included where relevant, depending on merit. It is anticipated there will be various sub-themes centred around the general conference theme and presentations may be made on topics of interest to ICT in the Pacific including (but not limited to): Client-Server Computing Computer Applications Database Systems e-Government e-Health GIS and Remote Sensing Internet Security Open Source Systems Networking and Routing Protocols and Standards Risk Management Rural/Remote Telecommunications Presentation streams include (subject to change, visit our website for updates or contact us for more information, or if you are interested in an unlisted stream): - *e-Health Initiatives in the Pacific* - *Building Connected Communities* - *An Open Source World* - *e-Government and the Pacific* - *Internet: Safety, Security and Censorship* - *ICT in Education* - *The VoIP (R)Evolution* - *IPv6* - *Women in Technology* - *New Media* *Presenting a Paper* There are two (2) conference streams: *Technical* and *Non-technical*. To register your interest in presenting please email PacINET 2008 Call for Papers <cfp(a)picisoc.org> with the Registration of Interest form available here: - Call for Papers PacINET2008.pdf (78.25 Kb)<http://www.picisoc.org/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=59> - Call for Papers PacINET2008.rtf (32.14 Kb)<http://www.picisoc.org/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=60> *Important Dates* May 11th 2008 Deadline for Registrations of Interest June 16th 2008 Notification of Acceptance June 30th 2008 Schedule of Presentations finalised July 21std 2008 Schedule of Presentations published September 1st - 5th 2008 Conference -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Franck Martin franck.martin(a)gmail.com http://www.peachymango.org/ "Toute connaissance est une réponse à une question" G. Bachelard

1 0

Weekly posting summary for alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten March 28, 2008

March 28, 2008

Total of 48 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Mar 28 00:53:02 EDT 2008 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 25.00% | 12 | 20.03% | 114586 | jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com 2.08% | 1 | 30.91% | 176873 | staff at atlarge.icann.org 10.42% | 5 | 6.02% | 34442 | evan at telly.org 10.42% | 5 | 5.97% | 34152 | dannyyounger at yahoo.com 8.33% | 4 | 7.04% | 40294 | jefsey at jefsey.com 6.25% | 3 | 5.03% | 28794 | roberto at icann.org 6.25% | 3 | 4.69% | 26852 | alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca 6.25% | 3 | 4.08% | 23319 | ross at tucows.com 4.17% | 2 | 2.92% | 16700 | wendy at seltzer.com 4.17% | 2 | 2.63% | 15047 | kieren.mccarthy at icann.org 2.08% | 1 | 1.88% | 10734 | brenbe at consumer.org 2.08% | 1 | 1.50% | 8577 | carlton.samuels at uwimona.edu.jm 2.08% | 1 | 1.50% | 8564 | veronicac at diplomacy.edu 2.08% | 1 | 1.30% | 7413 | nick.ashton-hart at icann.org 2.08% | 1 | 1.27% | 7288 | khaled.koubaa at gmail.com 2.08% | 1 | 1.17% | 6695 | narten at us.ibm.com 2.08% | 1 | 1.11% | 6342 | johnl at iecc.com 2.08% | 1 | 0.96% | 5477 | bfausett at internet.law.pro --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 48 |100.00% | 572149 | Total

1 0