December 2017 - At-Large - lists.icann.org

Re: [At-Large] v5 of the ICANN Stakeholder Analysis Tool - country analysis as well as regional analysis
by Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Jan. 3, 2018

Jan. 3, 2018

In my opinion it would be great to have this information included. I remember a few years ago having a discussion about this possibility. Is a database that includes this information available anywhere? Kindest regards, Olivier Sent from my Samsung device -------- Original message -------- From: Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele(a)blacknight.com> Date: 22/12/2017 12:57 pm (GMT+01:00) To: Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee(a)gmail.com>, At-Large Worldwide <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [At-Large] v5 of the ICANN Stakeholder Analysis Tool - country analysis as well as regional analysis Interesting Why are you including ccNSO and GAC, but not including registrars, registries or any of the other CSG? -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ http://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 On 21/12/2017, 02:31, "At-Large on behalf of Dev Anand Teelucksingh" <at-large-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of devtee(a)gmail.com> wrote: Hello All, I have done a fifth version of the ICANN Stakeholder Analysis Tool which allows for the ability to search by country: - At-Large Representation - ccNSO membership - GAC Membership - The Number of Fellowships and also do an regional or worldwide analysis on At-Large, ccNSO and GAC stakeholders . Screenshots attached. The Stakeholder Tool can be accessed at https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ICANN+Stakeholder+Analysis+Tool If you investigate the Countries sheet, you can see the variations of country names that different ACs, SOs and the Fellowship Programme within ICANN use to represent the same country. There's also a Nextgen sheet that if someone is willing to volunteer to help enter the information. The Nextgen sheet is open for anyone to edit. Thoughts, comments appreciated. Dev Anand Teelucksingh At-Large member, Trinidad and Tobago Computer Society, http://ttcs.tt/ _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

13 16

v5 of the ICANN Stakeholder Analysis Tool - country analysis as well as regional analysis
by Dev Anand Teelucksingh Jan. 3, 2018

Jan. 3, 2018

Hello All, I have done a fifth version of the ICANN Stakeholder Analysis Tool which allows for the ability to search by country: - At-Large Representation - ccNSO membership - GAC Membership - The Number of Fellowships and also do an regional or worldwide analysis on At-Large, ccNSO and GAC stakeholders . Screenshots attached. The Stakeholder Tool can be accessed at https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ICANN+Stakeholder+Analysis+Tool If you investigate the Countries sheet, you can see the variations of country names that different ACs, SOs and the Fellowship Programme within ICANN use to represent the same country. There's also a Nextgen sheet that if someone is willing to volunteer to help enter the information. The Nextgen sheet is open for anyone to edit. Thoughts, comments appreciated. Dev Anand Teelucksingh At-Large member, Trinidad and Tobago Computer Society, http://ttcs.tt/

7 8

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by narten＠us.ibm.com Dec. 29, 2017

Dec. 29, 2017

Total of 15 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Dec 29 00:53:03 EST 2017 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 13.33% | 2 | 90.92% | 5208794 | seeburn.k at gmail.com 26.67% | 4 | 1.80% | 103050 | michele at blacknight.com 13.33% | 2 | 1.36% | 78161 | mcknight.glenn at gmail.com 6.67% | 1 | 2.74% | 156954 | devtee at gmail.com 6.67% | 1 | 0.95% | 54376 | tijani.benjemaa at fmai.org.tn 6.67% | 1 | 0.85% | 48807 | alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca 6.67% | 1 | 0.43% | 24749 | maureen.hilyard at gmail.com 6.67% | 1 | 0.41% | 23223 | carlton.samuels at gmail.com 6.67% | 1 | 0.34% | 19523 | ocl at gih.com 6.67% | 1 | 0.20% | 11280 | narten at us.ibm.com --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 15 |100.00% | 5728917 | Total

1 0

seasons greetings
by Kris Seeburn Dec. 28, 2017

Dec. 28, 2017

Kris Seeburn seeburn.k(a)gmail.com www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/ <http://www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/>

1 0

seasons greetings
by Kris Seeburn Dec. 23, 2017

Dec. 23, 2017

Kris Seeburn seeburn.k(a)gmail.com www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/ <http://www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/>

1 0

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by narten＠us.ibm.com Dec. 22, 2017

Dec. 22, 2017

Total of 3 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Dec 22 00:53:03 EST 2017 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 33.33% | 1 | 90.23% | 403453 | devtee at gmail.com 33.33% | 1 | 7.14% | 31949 | joly at punkcast.com 33.33% | 1 | 2.63% | 11751 | narten at us.ibm.com --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 3 |100.00% | 447153 | Total

1 0

Internet Governance Forum 2017 under way in Geneva – webcast / remote participation available
by Joly MacFie Dec. 18, 2017

Dec. 18, 2017

OK, it's here! 4 days x 13 tracks of full-on Internet Governance intercourse! If you seriously want to keep up, my suggestion is to open ALL the live caption streams in separate tabs of a single browser window. Not only can you flip, but you can always text-search them at the end of the day. Alternatively you can pick highlights and join via webex. Such as, today: The Dynamic Coalition on Core Internet Values <https://igf2017.sched.com/event/CSCu/dc-on-core-internet-values>, the Dynamic Coalition on Blockchain <http://sched.co/CSCj>, or the Collaborative Session on Fake News <http://sched.co/CSCz>. [image: igf]This week, from *Monday-Thursday December 18-21 2017*, the *12th annual Internet Governance Forum <https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2017-geneva-switzerlan…>* (IGF) will be held in Geneva, Switzerland, with the theme, *Shape Your Digital Future!*. Remote participation is available via *Webex <https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2017-online-participat…>* and *YouTube <https://www.youtube.com/user/igf/>*. Sessions will be *live captioned* <https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2017-live-captions>. Geneva is UTC+1 = 6 hours ahead of NYC. *What: Internet Governance Forum 2017 <https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2017-geneva-switzerlan…>* *Where: **Geneva, Switzerland* *When: Monday-Thursday December 18-21 2017* *Schedule: https://igf2017.sched.com/grid/ <https://igf2017.sched.com/grid/>* *Webex: https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2017-online-participat… <https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2017-online-participat…>* *Webcast: http://www.intgovforum.org/webcast <http://www.intgovforum.org/webcast>* *YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/igf/ <https://www.youtube.com/user/igf/>* *Captions: https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2017-live-captions <https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2017-live-captions>* *Twitter: #igf2017 http://bit.ly/igf2017tweets <http://bit.ly/igf2017tweets>* Comment <http://isoc-ny.org/p2/9722#respond> See all comments <http://isoc-ny.org/p2/9722#comments> *Permalink* http://isoc-ny.org/p2/9722 -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -------------------------------------------------------------- -

1 0

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by narten＠us.ibm.com Dec. 15, 2017

Dec. 15, 2017

Total of 19 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Dec 15 00:53:03 EST 2017 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 31.58% | 6 | 35.99% | 302671 | javrua at gmail.com 21.05% | 4 | 28.13% | 236540 | williamcunningham840 at gmail.com 10.53% | 2 | 11.92% | 100227 | coffin at isoc.org 10.53% | 2 | 7.60% | 63930 | salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com 5.26% | 1 | 5.00% | 42030 | isolatedn at gmail.com 5.26% | 1 | 4.68% | 39368 | alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca 5.26% | 1 | 3.87% | 32537 | joly at punkcast.com 5.26% | 1 | 1.48% | 12470 | narten at us.ibm.com 5.26% | 1 | 1.33% | 11174 | bzs at theworld.com --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 19 |100.00% | 840947 | Total

1 0

WEBCAST TODAY: Internet Society + Chatham House Panel: Do We Still Trust the Internet?
by Joly MacFie Dec. 14, 2017

Dec. 14, 2017

You probably are familiar with, or have heard of, the Chatham House Rule, which protects the anonymity of discussants. Fortunately that has not been invoked for this, thus we are able to webcast what promises to be very good session. Note the participation, not only of ISOC's Sally Wentworth, but also Marina Kaljurand of Estonia, where there recently has been a crisis of confidence <https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2017/09/security_flaw_i.html> in the crypto behind their national ID card. 1pm NYC time. Open Captions. [image: livestream] <https://livestream.com/internetsociety/securitization/> Today, *Thursday 14 December 2017* the *Internet Society <https://internetsociety.org/>* and *Chatham House <https://www.chathamhouse.org/event/do-we-still-trust-internet>* will host a panel discussion *Do We Still Trust the Internet? <https://www.internetsociety.org/events/chatham-house-panel-discussion-do-we…>*in London. Over the past few years, there has been a clear shift towards greater ‘securitization’ of the Internet, where security is less about personal data integrity and network resilience, and more about national security and political control. This is evident through the practice of Internet shutdowns, data localization policies, attacks on the multi-stakeholder model of Internet governance and encryption backdoors. At this event, held in partnership with the Internet Society, participants will discuss the trend towards ‘securitization’, its implications and how to strengthen trust in the Internet, Participants: ** *Marina Kaljurand*, Chair, Global Commission on the Stability of Cyberspace; Minister of Foreign Affairs, Estonia (2015-16); *Sally Wentworth*, Vice President of Global Policy Development, Internet Society; *Patricia Lewis*, Research Director, International Security Department, Chatham House. Moderator: *Emily Taylor*, Associate Fellow, International Security and Editor, Journal of Cyber Policy, Chatham House. The event will be webcast live via the *Internet Society Livestream Channel <https://livestream.com/internetsociety/securitization/>*, *YouTube <https://youtu.be/O5ZiAsQSzRw>*, and *Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/InternetSociety/>*. *What: Chatham House Panel: Do We Still Trust the Internet? <https://www.internetsociety.org/events/chatham-house-panel-discussion-do-we…>When: Thursday 14 December 2017 18:00 – 19:00 UTC | 13:00-14:00 ESTWebcast: Livestream <https://livestream.com/internetsociety/securitization/> | Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/InternetSociety/> | YouTube <https://youtu.be/O5ZiAsQSzRw>Captioning: https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=CFI-ISOC <https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=CFI-ISOC>Twitter: #securitization - http://bit.ly/2AoPlpC <http://bit.ly/2AoPlpC>* Comment <http://isoc-ny.org/p2/9709#respond> See all comments <http://isoc-ny.org/p2/9709#comments> *Permalink* http://isoc-ny.org/p2/9709 -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -------------------------------------------------------------- -

1 0

Re: [At-Large] FCC TO SCRAP NET NEUTRALITY
by Alan Greenberg Dec. 11, 2017

Dec. 11, 2017

Two points of clarification. 1. The mission of ICANN has always been narrow, but with the major revision of the Bylaws following the ICANN Accountability work over the last two years, the mission has become even more restricted and is explicitly enumerated, thus 1.1(b) explicitly saying that the previous paragraphs are complete. So not being counter the mission does not mean it is included. Similarly, expressions such as "broadly defined" are not how this is viewed by many. I happen to agree that ICANN's mission should be more flexible. But that was not the bottom-up decision of the community. 2. My reference to years of experience was not in relation to interpreting ICANN's mission, but in demonstrating that many in this group have a long history of doing things to aid the Internet without regard to financial or other benefits. Alan At 07/12/2017 11:22 PM, William Michael Cunningham wrote: >I see nothing in the bylaws which runs counter >to my position. In point of fact, in several >places there is support for my inquiry, which >is, by the way, simply this: how might the newly >revealed FCC AND policy impact DNS security, >stability and, most importantly, OPEN access, >broadly defined. The answer is certainly not that it will have no impact. > >Further, I see nothing in the bylaws that gives >added weight to years of experience in any >aspect of policy. If there is, please point it >out. As a "bottom up" initiative, there should be a specific policy on this. > >On Dec 7, 2017 10:42 PM, "Alan Greenberg" ><<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> wrote: >William, you are free to believe whatever you >wish. But that does not change what is written in ICANN's Bylaws. I quote: > >Section 1.1. MISSION > >(a) The mission of the Internet Corporation for >Assigned Names and Numbers ("ICANN") is to >ensure the stable and secure operation of the >Internet's unique identifier systems as >described in this Section 1.1(a) (the "Mission"). Specifically, ICANN: > > (i) Coordinates the allocation and > assignment of names in the root zone of the > Domain Name System ("DNS") and coordinates the > development and implementation of policies > concerning the registration of second-level > domain names in generic top-level domains > ("gTLDs"). In this role, ICANN's scope is to > coordinate the development and implementation of policies: > > For which uniform or coordinated > resolution is reasonably necessary to > facilitate the openness, interoperability, > resilience, security and/or stability of the > DNS including, with respect to gTLD registrars > and registries, policies in the areas described in Annex G-1 and Annex G-2; and > That are developed through a bottom-up > consensus-based multistakeholder process and > designed to ensure the stable and secure > operation of the Internet's unique names systems. > > The issues, policies, procedures, and > principles addressed in Annex G-1 and Annex G-2 > with respect to gTLD registrars and registries > shall be deemed to be within ICANN's Mission. > > (ii) Facilitates the coordination of the > operation and evolution of the DNS root name server system. > > (iii) Coordinates the allocation and > assignment at the top-most level of Internet > Protocol numbers and Autonomous System numbers. > In service of its Mission, ICANN (A) provides > registration services and open access for > global number registries as requested by the > Internet Engineering Task Force ("IETF") and > the Regional Internet Registries ("RIRs") and > (B) facilitates the development of global > number registry policies by the affected > community and other related tasks as agreed with the RIRs. > > (iv) Collaborates with other bodies as > appropriate to provide registries needed for > the functioning of the Internet as specified by > Internet protocol standards development > organizations. In service of its Mission, > ICANN's scope is to provide registration > services and open access for registries in the > public domain requested by Internet protocol development organizations. > >(b) ICANN shall not act outside its Mission. > >(c) ICANN shall not regulate (i.e., impose rules >and restrictions on) services that use the >Internet's unique identifiers or the content >that such services carry or provide, outside the >express scope of Section 1.1(a). For the >avoidance of doubt, ICANN does not hold any >governmentally authorized regulatory authority. >===== > >"Secure and stable operation" *IS* one of the >key phrases, but one cannot ignore that words >that come after it - "of the Internet's unique >identifier systems". We work within the overall >Internet Governance System that includes >national laws and regulations. But we have >responsibility for only a small and very specific part of that. > >Many of us passionately care about how well the >Internet functions and how accessible it is to >our own communities and those of our colleagues >around the world. Despite you insinuations that >we may be taking certain positions for personal >or corporate financial gain, many of us have >spent DECADES helping to further the goal of >good, widely available, reliable and secure >Internet access and have done this with no hope >or desire to personally gain from our efforts. > >Alan Greenberg > > > > >At 07/12/2017 06:39 PM, William Michael Cunningham wrote: > >>Even if I believed this incorporated the >>totality of the ICANN mission, which I do not, >>"stable and secure" is the operative phrase. >>Removing nn at the FCC is a destabilizing >>policy change, in much the same way that >>removing glass steagal was destabilizing to the financial marketplace. >> >>On Dec 7, 2017 6:32 PM, "Carlton Samuels" >><<mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com> carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>Just seeing this. ICANN's remit is >>coordinating the Internet's unique identifiers >>in furtherance of a stable and secure domain name system. >>While interesting and even mildly entertaining, >>the FCC's NN malarkey is decidedly outside the ICANN remit. >>-Carlton >>============================== >>Carlton A Samuels >>Mobile: <tel:(876)%20818-1799>876-818-1799 >>Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround >>============================= >>On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:07 PM, William Michael >>Cunningham >><<mailto:williamcunningham840@gmail.com> >>williamcunningham840(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>A reading of the FCC Net Neutrality order >>clearly reveals how impactful this order will >>be on ICANN's stated mission and goals. A focus >>on technical aspects of the operation of the >>Internet's identifiers is incorrect. Such a >>focus is simply too narrow, driven and >>suggested by a small group of mainly >>non-minority individuals who appear to support >>the financial interests of their group, and >>their group alone. This entirely monetary focus >>is contrary to ICANN's desire to facilitate >>discussion by all internet users in matters of >>national internet policy development. >>Here are some other factors: >>"Security and Stability" >>"Diversity - income, gender race." >>"Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer >>Choice" Clearly, the order will impact each of >>these areas separately and jointly. >>I suggest a formal process for obtaining >>opinions from the At-large group about >>perspective on the proposed FCC policy, not >>short circuiting discussion by listening to the >>opinions of a small group of insiders. >>In other words, why don't we ask people what >>they think, instead of telling them that the FCC policy is irrelevant? >>On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:08 PM, William >>Michael Cunningham >><<mailto:williamcunningham840@gmail.com> >>williamcunningham840(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>Clearly, you have not looked at this or the >>previous order and I have no interest in doing >>it for you. I'd also suggest you look at the >>video of the prior net neutrality hearing under >>the previous Chair. Since I was at that >>meeting, I can confirm that your concerns were noted quite indelibly. >>On Dec 4, 2017 10:01 PM, "John R. Levine" >><<mailto:johnl@iecc.com>johnl(a)iecc.com> wrote: >>Interesting. Suggest you look again. >> >>Thanks for confirming that we have both looked >>at each of the 125 paragraphs of the FCC's >>recent order, as well as Appendices A and B, >>and the statements of the various commissioners >>and we agree that there is nothing affecting >>the operation of the Internet's identfiers that would be relevant to ICANN. >>R's, >>John >-- >Minority and Women-owned Company Small Business >Financing Guide and Workbook: ><https://www.minorityfinance.com/mfinform1.html>https://www.minorityfinance.com/mfinform1.html > >Twitter: @CreativeInv >My new book: The JOBS Act: Crowdfunding for Small Businesses and Startups ><https://www.amazon.com/JOBS-Act-Crowdfunding-Businesses-Startups/dp/1484224…>https://www.amazon.com/JOBS-Act-Crowdfunding-Businesses-Startups/dp/1484224… > > ><tel:(202)%20455-0430>202-455-0430 >"Evil is not driven out, but crowded >out...through the expulsive power of something good. " MLK >This communication (including all pages in this >email and any attached document) are for the >sole use of the intended recipient and may >contain confidential information. Unauthorized >use, distribution, disclosure or any action >taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on this >document is prohibited, and may be unlawful. By >inadvertent disclosure of this document Creative >Investment Research, Inc. and William Michael >Cunningham do not waive confidentiality >privilege with respect hereto. This >writing/publication is a creative work fully >protected by all applicable copyright laws, as >well as by misappropriation, trade secret, >unfair competition and other applicable laws. No >copyright is claimed in the text of statutes, >regulations, and any excerpts from othersÃ¢ >reports or articles quotedted within this work. >CopyrightÃÂ©2017 by William Michael Cunningham >and Creative Investment Research, Inc. All >rights reserved including the right to >reproduuce in wholle or in part in any form. >_______________________________________________ >At-Large mailing list ><mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org>At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >At-Large Official Site: <http://atlarge.icann.org>http://atlarge.icann.org > > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Content-Disposition: inline >X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: > >1;YQXPR0101MB1589;27:arpRVjv76hltAnGe1cdByIdOqFgVtIbjG6NaQur3xe4pDd4Yqtty93qjBOptqrzH6MizEdn3+qGcgmNLPq97fMxp2H7b24vcxfLCxwDZeJt9tA+Z7Cwc1PujHvOW5mWQ >X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: > >/zjmkQ9wmB7vEEZ+yI/mLSxTvRRLPhaNFA+muFF/XPNsMXtDJJDtJ10qCRyh9IWW/Tn7qeYuHkzknp7BWhU4bD+AV6sb8Lxa8z4+OJkiibghAT5MTWATi24qFy1890GjgLnnZp3Rhx8yjHfAzVcFeA== > > >_______________________________________________ >At-Large mailing list ><mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org>At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >At-Large Official Site: <http://atlarge.icann.org/>http://atlarge.icann.org

4 8