- At-Large - lists.icann.org

Fwd: [Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services] FINAL Public report for EWG Beijing Sessions
by Carlton Samuels April 20, 2013

April 20, 2013

Herewith, the report of the EWG's Beijing activities. -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================

2 1

RFC on "The Internet of Things".
by Carlton Samuels April 19, 2013

April 19, 2013

The United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is seeking public comments on the privacy and security concerns implied by the so-called “Internet of Things”. Some of the questions they’re seeking comments for include: · What are the significant developments in services and products that make use of this connectivity (including prevalence and predictions)? · What are the various technologies that enable this connectivity (e.g., RFID, barcodes, wired and wireless connections)? · What types of companies make up the smart ecosystem? · What are the current and future uses of smart technology? · How can consumers benefit from the technology? · What are the unique privacy and security concerns associated with smart technology and its data? For example, how can companies implement security patching for smart devices? What steps can be taken to prevent smart devices from becoming targets of or vectors for malware or adware? · How should privacy risks be weighed against potential societal benefits · Can and should de-identified data from smart devices be used for these purposes, and if so, under what circumstances? The comment period close on June 1, 2013. You can engage electronically via iot(a)ftc.gov or in written form. If you decide on analog connections, send - mailed or delivered – to 600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W., Room H-113 (Annex B), Washington, DC 20580. They anticipate delays using snail mail so they ask you use a courier service. J -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================

1 0

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten April 19, 2013

April 19, 2013

Total of messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Apr 19 07:07:07 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------

1 0

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten April 19, 2013

April 19, 2013

Total of 2 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Apr 19 07:03:56 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 50.00% | 1 | 83.99% | 36114 | carlton.samuels at gmail.com 50.00% | 1 | 16.01% | 6886 | narten at us.ibm.com --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 2 |100.00% | 43000 | Total

1 0

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten April 18, 2013

April 18, 2013

Total of messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Apr 19 00:53:03 EDT 2013

1 0

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten April 11, 2013

April 11, 2013

Total of 5 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Apr 12 00:53:04 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 40.00% | 2 | 41.49% | 19307 | salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com 20.00% | 1 | 23.29% | 10838 | yaovito at yahoo.fr 20.00% | 1 | 20.38% | 9486 | carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com 20.00% | 1 | 14.84% | 6906 | narten at us.ibm.com --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 5 |100.00% | 46537 | Total

1 0

Re: [At-Large] Fwd: NEW TIME - Beijing - INFORMAL Meeting -Thursday 11 April from 8-9am
by carlos dionisio aguirre April 9, 2013

April 9, 2013

What is the link to remote participation? Carlos Dionisio Aguirre. Enviado desde mi dispositivo inalámbrico BlackBerry® -----Original Message----- From: Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro(a)gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 08:54:28 To: <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>; <apralo-beijing(a)icann.org> Subject: [At-Large] Fwd: NEW TIME - Beijing - INFORMAL Meeting -Thursday 11 April from 8-9am Dear All, If you are interested in the Capacity Building discussions, the meeting is tomorrow at 8am tomorrow morning. See details below. This will be a working and strategies meeting and it will be great if ALSes can send their reps to make your views heard. Let's make use of the opportunity of being physically present. Thank you. Kind Regards, Sala T Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: > From: Gisella Gruber <Gisella.Gruber(a)icann.org> > Date: April 9, 2013, 3:05:24 PM GMT+08:00 > To: Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro(a)gmail.com>, ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > Cc: At-Large Capacity Building WG <capacity-building-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>, Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes(a)icann.org>, Susie Johnson <susie.johnson(a)icann.org> > Subject: NEW TIME - Beijing - INFORMAL Meeting -Thursday 11 April from 8-9am > >> Dear All, >> >> Please of note that the new time for the At-Large Capacity Building Group INFORMAL Meeting is on Thursday 11 April 2013 from 08:00 - 09:00am. >> >> Meeting room MOON (Hotel Meeting Rooms 2nd Floor) >> >> Adobe Connect: >> http://icann.adobeconnect.com/alcb-wg/ >> >> Thank you. >> Regards, >> >> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen >> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >> E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >> >> One World, One Internet > > > > From: "Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro" <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro(a)gmail.com> > Date: Tuesday, 9 April 2013 05:03 > To: At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > Cc: At-Large Capacity Building WG <capacity-building-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>, Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes(a)icann.org>, Susie Johnson <susie.johnson(a)icann.org> > Subject: Re: [Capacity-Building-WG] REVISED TIME - Beijing - INFORMAL Meeting - Tuesday 9 April from 1-2pm > > Given that it is 12 noon and venue has yet to be confirmed, can we move it to tomorrow with a known room please. > > Sent from my iPad > > On Apr 8, 2013, at 10:52 PM, At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> wrote: > >> Dear All, >> >> Please note that the new time for the At-Large Capacity Building Group INFORMAL Meeting is on Tuesday 9 April 2013 from 1-2pm (13:00 - 14:00). This is the only other option. >> >> Meeting room TBC. >> >> Adobe Connect: >> http://icann.adobeconnect.com/alcb-wg/ >> >> Thank you. >> Regards, >> >> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen >> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >> E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >> >> One World, One Internet >> >> From: At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> >> Date: Monday, 8 April 2013 06:27 >> To: At-Large Capacity Building WG <capacity-building-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >> Subject: [Capacity-Building-WG] Beijing - INFORMAL Meeting - Wednesday 10 April 2013 at 11am >> >> Dear All, >> >> Further to today's meeting, please note that the Capacity Building Working Group will be holding an informal meeting on Wednesday 10 April from 11am to 12 pm. >> >> Meeting room - to be confirmed shortly >> >> Adobe Connect: >> http://icann.adobeconnect.com/alcb-wg/ >> >> Thank you. >> Regards, >> >> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen >> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >> E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >> >> One World, One Internet >> _______________________________________________ >> capacity-building-wg mailing list >> capacity-building-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/capacity-building-wg _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

1 0

Fwd: NEW TIME - Beijing - INFORMAL Meeting -Thursday 11 April from 8-9am
by Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro April 9, 2013

April 9, 2013

Dear All, If you are interested in the Capacity Building discussions, the meeting is tomorrow at 8am tomorrow morning. See details below. This will be a working and strategies meeting and it will be great if ALSes can send their reps to make your views heard. Let's make use of the opportunity of being physically present. Thank you. Kind Regards, Sala T Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: > From: Gisella Gruber <Gisella.Gruber(a)icann.org> > Date: April 9, 2013, 3:05:24 PM GMT+08:00 > To: Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro(a)gmail.com>, ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > Cc: At-Large Capacity Building WG <capacity-building-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>, Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes(a)icann.org>, Susie Johnson <susie.johnson(a)icann.org> > Subject: NEW TIME - Beijing - INFORMAL Meeting -Thursday 11 April from 8-9am > >> Dear All, >> >> Please of note that the new time for the At-Large Capacity Building Group INFORMAL Meeting is on Thursday 11 April 2013 from 08:00 - 09:00am. >> >> Meeting room MOON (Hotel Meeting Rooms 2nd Floor) >> >> Adobe Connect: >> http://icann.adobeconnect.com/alcb-wg/ >> >> Thank you. >> Regards, >> >> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen >> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >> E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >> >> One World, One Internet > > > > From: "Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro" <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro(a)gmail.com> > Date: Tuesday, 9 April 2013 05:03 > To: At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > Cc: At-Large Capacity Building WG <capacity-building-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>, Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes(a)icann.org>, Susie Johnson <susie.johnson(a)icann.org> > Subject: Re: [Capacity-Building-WG] REVISED TIME - Beijing - INFORMAL Meeting - Tuesday 9 April from 1-2pm > > Given that it is 12 noon and venue has yet to be confirmed, can we move it to tomorrow with a known room please. > > Sent from my iPad > > On Apr 8, 2013, at 10:52 PM, At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> wrote: > >> Dear All, >> >> Please note that the new time for the At-Large Capacity Building Group INFORMAL Meeting is on Tuesday 9 April 2013 from 1-2pm (13:00 - 14:00). This is the only other option. >> >> Meeting room TBC. >> >> Adobe Connect: >> http://icann.adobeconnect.com/alcb-wg/ >> >> Thank you. >> Regards, >> >> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen >> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >> E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >> >> One World, One Internet >> >> From: At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> >> Date: Monday, 8 April 2013 06:27 >> To: At-Large Capacity Building WG <capacity-building-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >> Subject: [Capacity-Building-WG] Beijing - INFORMAL Meeting - Wednesday 10 April 2013 at 11am >> >> Dear All, >> >> Further to today's meeting, please note that the Capacity Building Working Group will be holding an informal meeting on Wednesday 10 April from 11am to 12 pm. >> >> Meeting room - to be confirmed shortly >> >> Adobe Connect: >> http://icann.adobeconnect.com/alcb-wg/ >> >> Thank you. >> Regards, >> >> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen >> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >> E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >> >> One World, One Internet >> _______________________________________________ >> capacity-building-wg mailing list >> capacity-building-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/capacity-building-wg

2 2

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten April 4, 2013

April 4, 2013

Total of 4 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Apr 5 00:53:08 EDT 2013 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 50.00% | 2 | 51.28% | 15991 | ocl at gih.com 25.00% | 1 | 25.14% | 7840 | alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca 25.00% | 1 | 23.58% | 7352 | narten at us.ibm.com --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 4 |100.00% | 31183 | Total

1 0

Fwd: Draft ALAC Statement of PIC DRP
by Alan Greenberg March 30, 2013

March 30, 2013

>To: ALAC Working List <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> >Subject: Draft ALAC Statement of PIC DRP > >Holly had volunteered to look at the Public Interest Commitment >(PIC) Dispute Resolution Procedure (DRP) and see if an ALAC >statement was required. > >Due to time constraints, she could not do this, and Olivier asked my >to follow up on it. > >I did so, and found that the DRP was, in my mind, not satisfactory. >The DRP can be found at >http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/draft-picdrp-15mar13-en.pdf. > >The statement can be found at https://community.icann.org/x/pJlwAg >and is also reproduced below. It is short, but somewhat harsher than >those I would normally draft. > >Alan > >======================== >ALAC Statement on Public Interest Commitments Dispute Resolution Procedure > >The ALAC is disappointed in the proposed mechanism for enforcement >of the new gTLD Public Interest Commitments. > >Although described a dispute resolution procedure, the process was >introduce whereby a Public Interest Commitment (PIC) could be >"enforced by ICANN" >(http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/base-agreement-05feb13-en.htm) > >When announced, many in the community presumed that "enforced" >included an ICANN Compliance connection, and that "by ICANN" in fact >meant, "by ICANN". > >As it stands, the process: > >- Requires possibly significant fees, the magnitude of which are currently; > >- Requires that the complainant can show measurable harm due to the violation; > >- May be filed by ICANN, but there is no obligation to do so. > >Since no exception is noted, presumably ICANN could only file an >objection if ICANN itself could demonstrate that it was measurable >harmed. This sounds like a return to the days when the only >sanctions ICANN applied under the RAA were those where ICANN was not >being paid. > >Using this same standard of language, one could say that >"trade-marks are enforced by ICANN" because it has provided the UDRP. > >There was much hope in the community that the PIC would go at least >part way to recovering from the mistake of not requiring all new >gTLD applicants to stand by their application promises once the new >TLD is delegated. This hope has not been satisfied.

1 0