- At-Large - lists.icann.org

facebook vote
by Joly MacFie Sept. 1, 2010

Sept. 1, 2010

> Which of the following should be the URL of the At-Large Facebook fan page? > Please vote for URLs in order of preference with 1 (the first click made) > being your first choice, 2 your second and 3 your third. > > With possible answers: > > 1. http://www.facebook.com/ICANN.AtLarge > 2. http://www.facebook.com/icann.atlarge > 3. http://www.facebook.com/ICANN.ATLARGE > > **** > Althouigh only ALAC members get to vote on this, I think the rank-and-file could do well to make their preferences known. Personally, by a thin margin, I will take #2 - all lower case - over #1. I don't like #3 at all, Vorying ends today Aug 30 at 2359 UTC j -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com Secretary - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org ---------------------------------------------------------------

15 17

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten Aug. 27, 2010

Aug. 27, 2010

Total of 5 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Aug 27 00:53:02 EDT 2010 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 40.00% | 2 | 39.26% | 13156 | jmamodio at gmail.com 20.00% | 1 | 22.23% | 7449 | annette.muehlberg at web.de 20.00% | 1 | 21.74% | 7285 | icann-list at sorehands.com 20.00% | 1 | 16.77% | 5618 | narten at us.ibm.com --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 5 |100.00% | 33508 | Total

1 0

Questions regarding nomination and board positions
by Manuel Schneider Aug. 26, 2010

Aug. 26, 2010

Dear all, dear staff, thanks for the ICANN usb stick with documents. It was very interesting to look through them. I'd like to take this opportunity as a newbie to ask some questions to which I didn't find answers yet in the ongoing discussions on the mailinglist as well as in the documents I got. To introduce our ALS and myself, I am contact person for the newly recognized ALS Wikimedia CH, one of the national chapters of the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organisation behind the Wikimedia projects such as Wikipedia, Wikinews, Wikibooks, Wiktionary etc. Myself is a studied IT engineer with an interest in free and open source software and corresponding social movements. As I am running a serverhosting business since eleven years I had to deal with ICANN's topics before, while I was never involved in ICANN before we decided to become an ALS with Wikimedia CH. Within Wikimedia I am working with Wikimedia Deutschland (as I am german) and am a founding member of Wikimedia CH (as I live on the boarder to Switzerland). Beside technical interest (hosting Wikimedia platforms for chapters in Switzerland, Austria and Israel) my main interest is the multicultural aspect of Wikimedia and running global projects be it organising conferences, spreading Wikimedia content in the global south or developing the Wikimedia organisation. As a newbie to ICANN I am still interested and curious in the mechanics, roles and goals of the different ALSes and holder of the various ICANN positions. So I am trying to follow the ongoing discussions, which is not very easy. These questions refer to both upcoming elections in the EURALO and ICANN board. * what are criteria to be nominated or elected into one of these board positions? Can someone point me to a document where they are described? * what kind of persons are supposed to be nominated / elected into these board positions? Are you looking for experienced ICANN / ALAC members or persons rooted in the community, defending interests of the users, like a counterweight to the commercial background of other board members? * how is a board mandate handled? Is this a political mandate which requires the feedback to and from the community or is it a personal position where board members represent themselves and are only accountable to their own conviction? * how are the selected candidates validated? How are nomination - self-nominations and such by other members - handled? Is there any difference, is there any consideration of RALO recommendations? What I wonder is how I as a newbie can choose a trustworthy candidate who represents my ALS and our community to which we feel accountable to. Maybe the answers to the questions above will shed more light on this process. Thanks a lot, Manuel -- Regards Manuel Schneider Wikimedia CH - Verein zur Förderung Freien Wissens Wikimedia CH - Association for the advancement of free knowledge www.wikimedia.ch

7 7

White House invites ICANN, registrars and registries to meeting to discuss the illegal sale of counterfeit prescription medications online
by Dev Anand Teelucksingh Aug. 26, 2010

Aug. 26, 2010

Via Krebs on Security blog : The Obama administration is inviting leaders of the top Internet domain name registrars and registries to attend a three-hour meeting at the White House next month about voluntary ways to crack down on Web sites that are selling counterfeit prescription medications. The invitation, sent via e-mail on Aug 13 by White House Senior Adviser for Intellectual Property Enforcement Andrew J. Klein, urges select recipients to attend a meeting on Sept. 29 with senior White House and cabinet officials, including Victoria Espinel, the Obama administration’s intellectual property enforcement coordinator. “The purpose of this meeting is to discuss illegal activity taking place over the internet generally, and more specifically, voluntary protocols to address the illegal sale of counterfeit non-controlled prescription medications on-line,” the invitation states. Read rest of article : http://krebsonsecurity.com/2010/08/white-house-calls-meeting-on-rogue-onlin… Wonder what other illegal activity taking place on the internet the US administration wants to discuss? Dev Anand Teelucksingh

1 0

Re: [At-Large] ICANN Board Nomination
by Evan Leibovitch Aug. 22, 2010

Aug. 22, 2010

There are a few issue mentioned here that are worth addressing: - As we can only pick one person to speak for At-Large on the Board, we don't have the luxury of affecting its gender, racial or regional diversity. The NomCom is already charged with this. It is critical that we pick the best possible advocate of user interests possible. Especially in this inaugural role, there is little opportunity for any secondary objective. - Not having an "insider" is a worthy idea, but the fact of the matter is that existing insiders have a provable public record of interest and skill in ICANN affairs and a track record of end-user advocacy. Those are, whether we like it or not, very strong qualities in a candidate. While it is a nice --- one could even say romantic --- notion to have a complete outsider come in and serve the role well, a known history of awareness and passion cannot and should not count against someone. - Evan (sent from my Android phone) On 21 Aug 2010 08:40, "Patrick Vande Walle" <patrick(a)vande-walle.eu> wrote: On 20 Aug 2010, at 23:55, Annette Muehlberg wrote: > Dear all, > > This is a very special moment:... Nothing against Avri personnally, but I thought the whole idea was to avoid choosing ICANN insiders and bring new blood to the Board. I would say we should avoid choosing anyone who has been on an AC or SO for the last 3 years (and this includes current and recent ALAC members and RALO leaders). Patrick Vande Walle _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.ic... At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

6 7

ComputerWorld : ICANN asks Demand Media for answers after report
by Dev Anand Teelucksingh Aug. 22, 2010

Aug. 22, 2010

ICANN asks Demand Media for answers after report By Robert McMillan, August 20, 2010, Computerworld The group responsible for managing the Internet's domain name system is asking Demand Media's eNom division for answers following complaints from Internet security groups. ENom, the world's second-largest domain name registrar, came under fire last week in a report from HostExploit (http://hostexploit.com/) a volunteer-run anti-malware research group. According to HostExploit, eNom is host to an unusually large number of malicious websites and is a preferred domain name registrar for pharmaceutical spammers. ICANN now says that it is looking into the matter, according to Kurt Pritz, senior vice president of services with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. Typically, ICANN advises people with information on illegal activity to take their complaints to law enforcement. "However, given the serious nature of some of the allegations made in the HostExploit report, we will ask eNom for their response and will follow up as appropriate," Pritz said in a statement, e-mailed to IDG News Service. HostExploit says that some eNom resellers are violating ICANN rules by allowing customers to provide false Whois database information, not following ICANN deletion policy and generally not complying with their obligations as resellers. Read full article : http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9181278/ICANN_asks_Demand_Media_for_…

1 0

Re: [At-Large] [EURO-Discuss] ICANN Board Nomination
by Adam Peake Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Patrick, I'm generally sympathetic to what you're saying, and also with Khaled Koubaa's email to the At Large list (expect everyone's read) about the importance of regional balance. If we were able to select more than one Director and were able to select from a large pool of candidates (I'm guessing the number may not be so large, it will be nice to be wrong) then I think these kind of factors would play a more significant role. But with only one pick for the next three and a half years, from what might be a smallish pool of candidates, I would emphasize the candidate's skills to perform the tasks of a director and serve the interests of users over all other factors. Adam >On 20 Aug 2010, at 23:55, Annette Muehlberg wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> This is a very special moment: For many years >>we have been working on setting up structures >>to get Internet users involved in ICANN¹s >>policy and decision making processes. After >>implementing RALOs in each region of the world >>we finally managed to (re)build a structure to >>have an Internet user representative on the >>ICANN Board with voting rights. This is a very >>important and responsible position. >> >> Herewith, I nominate Avri Doria to represent >>Internet users on the ICANN Board. >> > > She is extremely qualified to serve the >interests of users on the ICANN Board. Here, I >include just some of Avri's qualifications. She > >Nothing against Avri personnally, but I thought >the whole idea was to avoid choosing ICANN >insiders and bring new blood to the Board. >I would say we should avoid choosing anyone who >has been on an AC or SO for the last 3 years >(and this includes current and recent ALAC >members and RALO leaders). > >Patrick Vande Walle > > > > >_______________________________________________ >EURO-Discuss mailing list >EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > >Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org

1 0

Bad practices continue by supposed registrars from Asia ...
by Jorge Amodio Aug. 20, 2010

Aug. 20, 2010

Once again I'm starting to see this kind of emails: >Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:26:32 +0800 >From: "Margaret" <Margaret(a)bestnet.hk> >To: SOMEBODY >Subject: About " SOMENAME " intellectual property rights (To CEO & Principal) >X-Priority: 1 (Highest) >X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 22 [cn] >Disposition-Notification-To: "Margaret" <Margaret(a)bestnet.hk> > >Dear CEO & Principal > >We are a domain name registration and dispute organization in Asia, which mainly deal with the global companies' domain name registration and internet Intellectual property right protection in Asia. Currently, we have a pretty important issue needing to confirm with your company. >On August 19,2010, we received an application formally. One company named "KCTMD company" wanted to applied for the Network Brand " SOMENAME " and some domain names through our body. >Now we are handling with the registration of these domain names and find that these domain names and Network Brand is identical with your company's. So we have to confirm with you at two points: >1. If your company consign KCTMD company to register these domain names and Network Brand, we will send application form to them and help them finish the registration at once. >2. If your company have nothing to do with KCTMD company, they maybe have other purposes to register these domain names and Network Brand. >I want to confirm that are you the corporate representative of this company? If you do, I will feedback some problems to you; if you do not, please send my words to your company's corporate representative or lawyer. We need your answer of force adeffect. In order to deal with this issue better, please contact us by telephone or email as soon as possible. > >Best Regards, > >Margaret >Auditing Department > >Tel: 00852-81359178 >Fax: 00852-81359278 >Email: Margaret(a)bestnet.hk >Website: http://www.bestnet.hk This company does not show in the accredited registrars list. Previous times similar mails were sent from providers from China, after following up, they offer you to register your existing name in various TLDs and ccTLDs. They don't seem to be mining WHOIS data, just scanning websites and writing to contact email addresses exposed on the website, and obviously "KCTMD company" or whatever name they use is a fake. What is the proper course of action in this case ? Yes I know, I already ignored and deleted the message, but what about people being framed by this type of abusive behavior. Registries and Registrars should not do any biz with this kind of people. BTW if the person sending the email is actually called Margaret, I'm Mother Teresa of Calcuta. Regards Jorge

2 2

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten Aug. 20, 2010

Aug. 20, 2010

Total of 9 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Aug 20 00:53:02 EDT 2010 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 33.33% | 3 | 29.08% | 15630 | johnl at iecc.com 22.22% | 2 | 24.91% | 13391 | patrick at vande-walle.eu 11.11% | 1 | 12.60% | 6773 | avc at namesatwork.com 11.11% | 1 | 11.59% | 6232 | jmamodio at gmail.com 11.11% | 1 | 11.32% | 6082 | narten at us.ibm.com 11.11% | 1 | 10.49% | 5640 | roberto at icann.org --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 9 |100.00% | 53748 | Total

1 0

Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery
by Alan Greenberg Aug. 17, 2010

Aug. 17, 2010

The Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery PDP has posted their Initial Report. You will recall that the PDP was initiated by an ALAC Request for Issues Report. The Public Comment Period is open at http://icann.org/en/public-comment/#pednr-initial-report. It is scheduled to close on August 1, but hopefully it will be extended. An ALAC comment on this report has been drafted. It can be found at https://st.icann.org/gnso-liaison/index.cgi?at_large_gnso_liaison#pednr. It is also reproduced below for your convenience. The comment will be discussed and possibly endorsed at the 27 July ALAC meeting. The comment follows the expected outcomes outlined in the initial Request for Issues Report and also is in line with the views of the majority of At-Large participants in the Working Group. For PEDNR, the Public Comment process features an easy-to-complete survey. Since this policy development process was initiated by At-Large, it is REALLY important that as many At-Large people as possible complete the survey. PLEASE: - Review the comments below to see the At-Large position; - If you have the time, review the Initial Report; - Complete the short survey (it can be done without reading the full report). The survey is at <http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22AUYRGHCV4>http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22AUYRGHCV4. Alan -------------------------------------- The At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) requested the Issues Report which resulted in the Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery PDP, and it strongly supports the activities of the Working Group. It is essential that the post-expiration "safety net" that existed several years ago be restored. Moreover, the domain industry is sufficiently robust and mature that it can and must provide a level of predictability and security to gTLD domain name holders. In line with the desired outcomes stated in the original Issue Report request, the ALAC supports: 1. Consensus policy requiring that all registrars must allow renewal of domain names for a reasonable amount of time after expiration. 2. Consensus policy explicitly stating the minimum requirements for pre-expiration notices. 3. Consensus policy requiring clarity of how messages will be sent. 4. Consensus policy requiring that WHOIS contents to make it clear that a domain name has expired and has not yet been renewed by the registrant. 5. Consensus policy requiring that notice(s) be sent after expiration. 6. Consensus policy requiring that web sites (port 80) no longer can resolve to the original web site after expiration. 7. Consensus policy requiring that other uses of the domain name (e-mail, FTP, etc.) no longer function after expiration. 8. Consensus policy requiring clarity in the expiration terms and fees offered by registrars. 9. Consensus policy requiring that the Redemption Grace Period be offered by all registries (including future gTLDs) and by all registrars. It is understood that there may be unusual cases where the business models of some registrars may require exceptions to some of these policies. However, the need for such exceptions should not deny the vast majority of registrants a predictable and safe gTLD eco-system. Over and above these minimum requirements, the ALAC supports a move within the registrar community to establish the meaningful and transparent concept of "best practices".

13 27