- At-Large - lists.icann.org

New CIRA Whois Policy - fear mongering?
by Bill Silverstein May 8, 2008

May 8, 2008

> There's simply no basis for your fear mongering. There is no fear mongering. I am litigating against e360Insight and included Moniker as Defendant for providing anonymous whois service to spammers. Moniker has not identified or terminated the spammers, either e360 or on the original registrant of domain names that they claim do not belong to e360) Of course, I provided Moniker with copies of the spam (under oath) which Moniker admits that some of that spam are using BagainDepot's (sister company/co-defendant) anonymously registered domain names. I am not law enforcement. Just one of the people who tired of spammers using his servers as a using his inbox as a garbage can. Even is law enforcement was provided this information, there still need to be additional steps taken which will slow down the identification process. Do you think the FTC will start investigating a spammer that only sent 100 spams? Anonymous domain name registrations also prevent one from identifying how many are tied to a single spammer.

4 5

Prelim minutes from recent Board meeting
by Wendy Seltzer May 8, 2008

May 8, 2008

This will serve as my April-May liaison report. Preliminary minutes from the Board's April 20 meeting are now online. <http://www.icann.org/minutes/prelim-report-30apr08.htm> I was unable to make this meeting because it was 2 am locally, and a power outage cut my alarm clock. From the minutes and from follow-on conversations, however, I note several items of interest to At Large: The At-Large Summit, ALAC review, and GNSO improvements. While the summit is budgeted separately from the Cairo meeting, in the 2008-09 budget, some Board members raised concerns about the expected cost. The Summit team and At-Large should be prepared with compelling explanations of the proposed summit's value to ICANN. With regard to the GNSO Improvements plan, I'd like to know what ALAC and At-Large want conveyed to the Board. At the moment ALAC is signed on to a joint statement about which I've heard much concern on both process and substance. >From the minutes: > The Chair was interested in the GNSO review and improvements and inquired as to whether Susan Crawford was working with the GNSO on implementation of the recommendations. Roberto Gaetano advised that Susan was not chairing but participating, and that she is acting as liaison to the GNSO in order to facilitate the possible implementation. Gaetano continued that the comment period had just ended and that one proposal to have different structure for GNSO Council, or alternatively to go with new proposal of the three stakeholder groups to lump registries and registrars in one group. The proposal came from Philip Sheppard and it is signed by the cross constituencies, NCUC and ALAC. Roberto Gaetano indicated that he would leave it to ALAC Liaison Wendy Seltzer to comment to the Board, but that in his understanding there is a significant discussion about whether ALAC endorses the proposal. Gaetano indicated that there would be additional discussion with the goal of making a decisi on at the Paris ICANN meeting. The ALAC review was discussed, and it was noted that this is an "ALAC" review and not a review of all of "At Large's" place in the ICANN structure. The Board also authorized steps toward DNSSEC. Please let me know if you have questions or comments. --Wendy -- Wendy Seltzer -- wendy(a)seltzer.org Visiting Professor, Northeastern University School of Law Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html http://www.chillingeffects.org/ https://www.torproject.org/

6 6

Re: [At-Large] Monthly ALAC Teleconference 13 May 1330 UTC
by Jeffrey A. Williams May 8, 2008

May 8, 2008

Dominik and all, I didn't find Domain Name Tasting at the URL Matthias provided either. I can only guess that either ICANN is not interested for whatever reasons to actually solve the Domain Name Tasting problem and are happy with their half-baked solution, or are so embarased by Domain Name Tasting that it was purposfully not put on the agenda and seemingly wish to sweep the problem under the rug, so to speek... -----Original Message----- >From: Dominik Filipp <dominik.filipp(a)dsoft.sk> >Sent: May 7, 2008 1:56 AM >To: cheryl(a)hovtek.com.au, Matthias Langenegger <matthias.langenegger(a)icann.org>, alac-internal(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org, alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >Subject: Re: [At-Large] Monthly ALAC Teleconference 13 May 1330 UTC > >I cannot find Domain Tasting there. > >Where is it? > >Dominik > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Cheryl Langdon-Orr [mailto:cheryl@hovtek.com.au] >Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 10:41 AM >To: Dominik Filipp; 'Matthias Langenegger'; >alac-internal(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >Subject: RE: [At-Large] Monthly ALAC Teleconference 13 May 1330 UTC > >The Agenda is / will be found here >https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?13_may_2008 as Matthias mentioned >in his email Discussion items will be uploaded shortly... > >CLO > >-----Original Message----- >From: alac-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >[mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Dominik >Filipp >Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 5:49 PM >To: Matthias Langenegger; alac-internal(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >Subject: Re: [At-Large] Monthly ALAC Teleconference 13 May 1330 UTC > >Is there a list of issues to be discussed during the teleconference >available? > >Dominik > > >-----Original Message----- >From: alac-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >[mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Matthias >Langenegger >Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 4:06 AM >To: alac-internal(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >Subject: [At-Large] Monthly ALAC Teleconference 13 May 1330 UTC > >Dear all, > >This is to remind you about the upcoming monthly ALAC teleconference >taking place on Tuesday, 13 May at 1330 UTC. Please find additional >information such as participation instructions on the link below. > >https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?13_may_2008 > >A draft meeting agenda will be uploaded shortly. There will be Spanish >and French interpretation for this call. If you would like to be on the >French or the Spanish channel or if you would like to be on the English >channel and need to be dialed out to, please make sure your name is on >the dial-out list on the meeting page. > >Best Regards, >-- >Matthias Langenegger >At-Large Coordination Officer >Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > >Email: matthias.langenegger(a)icann.org >Main Tel: +41 (79) 644 65 35 >Fax: +41 (22) 594 85 44 >Skype ID: matthiaslangenegger >_______________________________________________ >ALAC mailing list >ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann >.org > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > >_______________________________________________ >ALAC mailing list >ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann >.org > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > > > >_______________________________________________ >ALAC mailing list >ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

1 0

Re: [At-Large] Prelim minutes from recent Board meeting
by Jeffrey A. Williams May 8, 2008

May 8, 2008

Wendy and all, Thank you for you interesting and seemingly well reasoned and frank remarks. My only comments are that the ALAC is still too disinclusive, seemingly intent of exclusion of users be they non-registrant users or registrant-users. Second, process within the ALAC is far too complex and as such also represents a barrier to praticipation and interest. This is certainly not a healthy thing. Third, ALS'es role in the ALAC and ICANN doesn't seem to be well thought out and seeks to segment, ergo devide users into catagories by country or origin which is not in the best interest of ICANN and can be by design, a catalist for introducing controversy where otherwise such would not always or even likely exist. As Lincoln said, a divided house cannot stand... -----Original Message----- >From: Wendy Seltzer <wendy(a)seltzer.com> >Sent: May 7, 2008 2:34 PM >To: At-Large <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >Subject: [At-Large] Prelim minutes from recent Board meeting > >This will serve as my April-May liaison report. > >Preliminary minutes from the Board's April 20 meeting are now online. ><http://www.icann.org/minutes/prelim-report-30apr08.htm> > >I was unable to make this meeting because it was 2 am locally, and a >power outage cut my alarm clock. From the minutes and from follow-on >conversations, however, I note several items of interest to At Large: > >The At-Large Summit, ALAC review, and GNSO improvements. > >While the summit is budgeted separately from the Cairo meeting, in the >2008-09 budget, some Board members raised concerns about the expected >cost. The Summit team and At-Large should be prepared with compelling >explanations of the proposed summit's value to ICANN. > >With regard to the GNSO Improvements plan, I'd like to know what ALAC >and At-Large want conveyed to the Board. At the moment ALAC is signed >on to a joint statement about which I've heard much concern on both >process and substance. > >>From the minutes: >> The Chair was interested in the GNSO review and improvements and inquired as to whether Susan Crawford was working with the GNSO on implementation of the recommendations. Roberto Gaetano advised that Susan was not chairing but participating, and that she is acting as liaison to the GNSO in order to facilitate the possible implementation. Gaetano continued that the comment period had just ended and that one proposal to have different structure for GNSO Council, or alternatively to go with new proposal of the three stakeholder groups to lump registries and registrars in one group. The proposal came from Philip Sheppard and it is signed by the cross constituencies, NCUC and ALAC. Roberto Gaetano indicated that he would leave it to ALAC Liaison Wendy Seltzer to comment to the Board, but that in his understanding there is a significant discussion about whether ALAC endorses the proposal. Gaetano indicated that there would be additional discussion with the goal of making a decisi >on at the Paris ICANN meeting. > >The ALAC review was discussed, and it was noted that this is an "ALAC" >review and not a review of all of "At Large's" place in the ICANN >structure. > >The Board also authorized steps toward DNSSEC. > >Please let me know if you have questions or comments. > >--Wendy > >-- >Wendy Seltzer -- wendy(a)seltzer.org >Visiting Professor, Northeastern University School of Law >Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society >http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html >http://www.chillingeffects.org/ >https://www.torproject.org/ > >_______________________________________________ >ALAC mailing list >ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

1 0

[Fwd: [ccnso-members] Call for Assistance for Cyclone Nargis Victims in Myanmar]
by Jacqueline A. Morris May 7, 2008

May 7, 2008

Hi all From the ccNSO list. Jacqueline -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [ccnso-members] Call for Assistance for Cyclone Nargis Victims in Myanmar Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 21:44:09 +1200 From: Don Hollander <don(a)aptld.org> Reply-To: Don Hollander <don(a)aptld.org> Organization: APTLD To: <member(a)aptld.org>, <ccnso-members(a)icann.org> CC: Wit Hmone T. Latt <withmone(a)ait.ac.th> Members: This from Wit Hmone of AIT/THNIC: Wit Hmone T. Latt <withmone(a)ait.ac.th <mailto:withmone@ait.ac.th>> I believe you may have heard about the powerful Tropical Cyclone Nargis slammed Myanmar (Burma) on Friday night, 2 May as it roared ashore from the Bay of Bengal. At least 22,500 people died in the Burma cyclone and some 41,000 are also missing three days after Cyclone Nargis hit the country, causing a huge tidal surge to sweep inland. The toll is rising rapidly as officials make contact with the worst-hit Irrawaddy delta areas, and the U.N. estimates up to a million left homeless by the catastrophic cyclone that has battered the country. Three days after the cyclone, large parts of the population remain without drinking water, food and shelter. Urgent humanitarian assistance is in need now. If there are some organizations or individuals interested to donate money and/or supplies for victims of disastrous cyclone, please do let me know. I am now liaising with the reliable NGO in Myanmar for helping these victims effectively and efficiently in every way we can. Please help forward this message to anyone you known who might be interested in donating supplies/money. Thank you, Wit Don Hollander APTLD General Manager don(a)aptld.org <mailto:don@aptld.org> www.aptld.org <http://www.aptld.org> +64 21 24 24 215

1 0

ALAC Statement
by Danny Younger May 7, 2008

May 7, 2008

Cheryl, I have taken note of the ALAC submission entitled "At-Large Advisory Committee Statement. To the ICANN Board on the Board Governance Committees Recommendations for Improvements to the Generic Names Supporting Organisation" posted on Sunday 4 May 2008 at http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvements-report-2008/msg00031.html Would you be good enough to inform us when the ALAC formally convened and ratified this document through a voting process? Please let us know the voting tally and which committee members voted in favor and which were opposed. Thank you, Danny ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

2 1

Re: [At-Large] [NA-Discuss] ALAC Statement
by Jeffrey A. Williams May 7, 2008

May 7, 2008

Danny and all, Thank you for making this request Danny. I also would like an answer. But I am not holding my breath in waiting to recieve one. I believe but do not know that the statement was arrived at on the "Internal list" which is of course restricted and no archives are avaliable that I am aware of. Of course if I am correct, than tranaparency and openess not to mention ligitimacy and accuracy as to determining a consensus on this statement is VERY questionable if not completely erronious. To my knowledge and from what I have been reading this Statement does not have consensus of the members, nor is it likely to gain same. -----Original Message----- >From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger(a)yahoo.com> >Sent: May 6, 2008 5:26 PM >To: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <cheryl(a)hovtek.com.au> >Cc: At-Large Worldwide <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>, na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >Subject: [NA-Discuss] ALAC Statement > >Cheryl, > >I have taken note of the ALAC submission entitled >"At-Large Advisory Committee Statement. To the ICANN >Board on the Board Governance Committees >Recommendations for Improvements to the Generic Names >Supporting Organisation" posted on Sunday 4 May 2008 >at >http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvements-report-2008/msg00031.html > >Would you be good enough to inform us when the ALAC >formally convened and ratified this document through a >voting process? Please let us know the voting tally >and which committee members voted in favor and which >were opposed. > >Thank you, >Danny > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ >Be a better friend, newshound, and >know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ > >------ >NA-Discuss mailing list >NA-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ic… > >Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org >------ Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

1 0

Re: [At-Large] New CIRA Whois Policy - fear mongering?
by Jeffrey A. Williams May 6, 2008

May 6, 2008

Ross and all, I was wondering if you understood well there Ross. However it seems that perhaps some corporate entities are excluded or have "Special" privilages. For instance it doesn't seem that Google.ca or wikipedia.ca are required to comply. See: http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=google.ca&token=27105b513… http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/whois.ch?ip=wikipedia.ca&server=&email=on&tok… So again, any reasonable person has to wonder if CIRA's policy is serious or just another fraud hoist upon the Canadian and the rest of the worlds public just so that there is a "Warm and Fuzzy" policy statement, eh? So than, I can only suppose that LEA's are supposed to say to themselves "well it's CIRA's policy, so therfore it must be so, even if there are a few exceptions", right? I say BS! -----Original Message----- >From: Ross Rader <ross(a)tucows.com> >Sent: May 5, 2008 5:13 AM >To: Evan Leibovitch <evan(a)telly.org> >Cc: Bill Silverstein <icann-list(a)sorehands.com>, alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >Subject: Re: [At-Large] New CIRA Whois Policy - fear mongering? > >Ross Rader wrote: >> Evan Leibovitch wrote: >> >>> Just to be clear... are corporate registrants not able to opt out? >> >> No. > >Oops. I meant "Yes". Corporate registrants are not able to opt out. > >I missed the double negative :-) > >/ross > >_______________________________________________ >ALAC mailing list >ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

1 0

Re: [At-Large] [NA-Discuss] GNSO Improvements Statement Edits
by Jeffrey A. Williams May 6, 2008

May 6, 2008

Louis and all, I also agree that the format was difficult to read in a side by side method. Better would be new over old. Evan, I have already sent in our members response to the GNSO improvements we believe are necessary, none of which by the way were listed in Nicks revision. -----Original Message----- >From: Louis Houle <louis.houle(a)oricom.ca> >Sent: May 5, 2008 1:43 PM >To: Evan Leibovitch <evan(a)telly.org> >Cc: Nick Ashton-Hart <Nick.Ashton-Hart(a)icann.org>, At-Large Worldwide <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>, NA Discuss <na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] [At-Large] GNSO Improvements Statement Edits > >So am I. Quite better. > >It would be nice to receive it in a «more» readable format. :-) > >Louis Houle >ISOC Québec > >Evan Leibovitch a écrit : >> Brendler, Beau wrote: >> >>> I'm closer to supporting this than anything else I've seen yet. >>> >>> Danny, Evan, what do you think (the document is a little difficult to read as it's very wide, I'm referring to Nick's revisions on the right). >>> >>> >> It is a massive step in the right direction, specifically in suggesting >> that ALAC may still play a role in GNSO while drafters are aware of its >> flowchart-rewriting consequences. >> >> I hope that there are lessons learned going forward -- certainly >> mistakes were made to get us to this point -- but on the immediate issue >> of "what do we send regarding the GNSO improvements" I like Nick's >> draft. Please -- especially amongst those who took issue with the >> original "final" versions -- if anyone has suggestions to make please >> offer them now. >> >> - Evan >> >> >> ------ >> NA-Discuss mailing list >> NA-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ic… >> >> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org >> ------ >> >> > > >------ >NA-Discuss mailing list >NA-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ic… > >Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org >------ Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

1 0

Transparency & the ICANN Contractual Compliance Newsletter
by Danny Younger May 5, 2008

May 5, 2008

Dear Ms. Burnette, I am appreciative of the fact that ICANN has generated this newsletter, but I have a number of concerns related to transparency. We are told that during 2007 a total of 164 breach of contract notices were sent to registrars. While this effort is to be commended, users would assuredly want to know which registrars are in breach of contract (and for what reason) at any given point in time so that they can make informed choices regarding which registration providers to use. Hiding this valuable information from consumers is not what I would deem to be a public service, rather, I view it as a profound disservice. While it does serve to protect the interest of registrars, it most certainly doesn't serve to properly protect the public. May I ask why ICANN has chosen to conceal this information? Is this behavior owing to a deliberate policy decision that has been made by ICANN Staff? Does Staff intend to continue concealing registrar contract breaches at the expense of the registrant community, or can we expect this situation to change in the immediate future? Hopefully you can help us to better understand the situation and the Staff perspective on transparency. best regards, Danny Younger ____________________________________________________________________________________ You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com

3 5