- At-Large - lists.icann.org

Weekly posting summary for alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten March 7, 2008

March 7, 2008

Total of 87 messages in the last 7 days. Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 39.08% | 34 | 44.11% | 118758 | jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com 10.34% | 9 | 6.04% | 16249 | franck.martin at gmail.com 5.75% | 5 | 7.42% | 19972 | nick.ashton-hart at icann.org 3.45% | 3 | 8.46% | 22773 | carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com 4.60% | 4 | 6.63% | 17842 | jefsey at jefsey.com 4.60% | 4 | 5.06% | 13630 | jam at jacquelinemorris.com 3.45% | 3 | 5.39% | 14507 | dthompson at gov.nu.ca 4.60% | 4 | 3.63% | 9775 | dannyyounger at yahoo.com 4.60% | 4 | 1.91% | 5148 | johnl at iecc.com 2.30% | 2 | 1.34% | 3607 | khaled.koubaa at gmail.com 2.30% | 2 | 1.13% | 3031 | evan at telly.org 1.15% | 1 | 2.21% | 5946 | vanda at uol.com.br 1.15% | 1 | 1.58% | 4247 | parminder at itforchange.net 1.15% | 1 | 1.05% | 2828 | staff at alac.icann.org 1.15% | 1 | 0.67% | 1807 | roberto at icann.org 1.15% | 1 | 0.62% | 1657 | jsalgueiro at cantv.net 1.15% | 1 | 0.45% | 1199 | michele at blacknight.ie 1.15% | 1 | 0.40% | 1076 | patrick at vande-walle.eu 1.15% | 1 | 0.39% | 1040 | staff at atlarge.icann.org 1.15% | 1 | 0.37% | 986 | derek at aa419.org 1.15% | 1 | 0.36% | 969 | roessler at does-not-exist.org 1.15% | 1 | 0.35% | 955 | veni at veni.com 1.15% | 1 | 0.30% | 797 | bfausett at internet.law.pro 1.15% | 1 | 0.15% | 406 | jerry_scott47 at yahoo.com --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 87 |100.00% | 269205 | Total

1 0

Missing ALAC links
by Jeffrey A. Williams March 7, 2008

March 7, 2008

Nick or whomever is responsible, Link to http://www.icannalac.org/ from https://st.icann.org/naralo/index.cgi shows http://www.icannalac.org/ does not exist. Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

1 0

Update: Domain Tasting Resolution
by Danny Younger March 7, 2008

March 7, 2008

The GNSO Council will be discussing the following motion tomorrow: Whereas, the GNSO Council has discussed the Issues Report on Domain Tasting and the Final Outcomes Report of the ad hoc group on Domain Tasting; Whereas, the GNSO Council resolved on 31 October 2007 to launch a PDP on Domain Tasting; Whereas, the GNSO Council authorized on 17 January 2008 the formation of a small design team to develop a plan for the deliberations on the Domain Tasting PDP (the Design Team), the principal volunteers to which had been members of the Ad Hoc Group on Domain Tasting and were well-informed of both the Final Outcomes Report of the Ad Hoc Group on Domain Tasting and the GNSO Initial Report on Domain Tasting (collectively with the Issues Report, the Reports on Domain Tasting); Whereas, the GNSO Council has received the Draft Final Report on Domain Tasting; Whereas, PIR, the .org registry operator, has amended its Registry Agreement to charge an Excess Deletion Fee; and both NeuStar, the .biz registry operator, and Afilias, the .info registry operator, are seeking amendments to their respective Registry Agreements to modify the existing AGP; The GNSO Council recommends to the ICANN Board of Directors that: 1. The applicability of the Add Grace Period shall be restricted for any gTLD which has implemented an AGP (Applicable gTLD Operator). Specifically, for each Applicable gTLD Operator: a. During any given month, an Applicable gTLD Operator may not offer any refund for any domain names deleted during the AGP that exceed (i) 10% of its net new registrations in that month (defined as total new registrations less domains deleted during AGP), or (ii) fifty (50) domain names, whichever is greater. b. A Registrar may seek an exemption from the application of such restriction in a specific month, upon the documented showing of extraordinary circumstances. For any Registrar requesting such an exemption, the Registrar must confirm in writing to the Registry Operator how, at the time the names were deleted, these extraordinary circumstances were not known, reasonably could not have been known, and were outside of the Registrars control. Acceptance of any exemption will be at the sole reasonable discretion of the Registry Operator, however "extraordinary circumstances" which reoccur regularly will not be deemed extraordinary. c. In addition to all other reporting requirements to ICANN, each Applicable gTLD Operator shall identify each Registrar that has sought an exemption, along with a brief descriptive identification of the type of extraordinary circumstance and the action (if any) that was taken by the Applicable gTLD Operator. 2. The above restriction on use of the Add Grace Period shall be considered an ICANN adopted specification or polic[y] prohibiting or restricting warehousing of or speculation in domain names by registrars in accordance with Section 3.7.9 of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement. As such, a Registrar that engages in domain tasting, defined as using the AGP to register domain names in order to test their profitability, shall be deemed in material breach of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement. 3. Implementation and execution of these recommendations shall be monitored by the GNSO. Specifically; a. ICANN Staff shall analyze and report to the GNSO at six month intervals for two years after implementation, until such time as the GNSO resolves otherwise, with the goal of determining; i. How effectively and to what extent the policies have been implemented and followed by Registries and Registrars, and ii. Whether or not modifications to these policies should be considered by the GNSO as a result of the experiences gained during the implementation and monitoring stages, b. The purpose of these monitoring and reporting requirements are to allow the GNSO to determine when, if ever, these recommendations and any ensuing policy require additional clarification or attention based on the results of the reports prepared by ICANN Staff. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

2 1

ALAC subscription info FAQ's/education
by Jeffrey A. Williams March 7, 2008

March 7, 2008

Jacqueline and whomever this does or should concern, The public subscription information to which I subscribed is at: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org It states that said subscription is a private list and that is is for "The worldwide community of ICANN At-Large discussion forum" http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo shows clearly that ALAC is for the "At-Large Worldwide Community". Does this broaden your education as well as provide some specificity to same as well? OR is the information/documentation on the above mentioned links not accurate? I freely yet again admit as well as wonder if the ALAC list is a private list and yet is for: "The worldwide community of ICANN At-Large discussion forum" such *may* be a poor discription of what the ALAC list is for or said listed documentation is intentionally inaccurate, or even your discription as well as Darlene's earlier crude and frustrated earlier retort of similar here:http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org/… are not in agreement with said documentation and thereby both of you are not accurate in your assumptions/statements as such. As such, and in any event public or private lists for the purposes of public user subscription and participation in an @large user representation in accordance with the MOU in this case would seem at a minimum to be conflicting and/or confused in fact. Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

1 0

From DNForum.com, please read - Phishing legislation concerns
by Jeffrey A. Williams March 6, 2008

March 6, 2008

All my friends, FYI: > Dear DNF members, > > We feel it is our duty to bring this to light and make people aware of > what's happening. As you may have heard, Senator Olympia Snow (R-ME) has > very recently introduced a bill that could threaten the future of the > domain name industry and internet commerce. Snowe's bill has been > introduced as the "Anti-Phishing" bill, but contains provisions that are > largely unrelated to these objectives. These provisions radically and > unnecessarily expand the rights of trademark owners to essentially provide > them with monopoly rights on registered trademarks. This would be to the > detriment of millions of individuals and businesses engaged in lawful and > legitimate Internet commerce. > > > If the bill passed through congress, it may allow large businesses to take > domain names with little to no effort. Trademark owners already prevail in > 85% of all UDRP complaints and nearly 100% of all ACPA cases. Yet some > apparently now wish to establish a new regime for contesting allegedly > infringing? domains that is tilted even more in their favor by denying > basic due process and substantive protections to domain name registrants > and that provides the possibility that they can use their power and > influence to sway public officials to expend taxpayer dollars in defense > of private Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs). > > > The proposal unfairly targets domain name registrants for a widespread > Internet practice if it's aim is to halt the advertising monetization of > brand names and typographical variations thereof when consumers engage in > direct Internet navigation or in web searches it utterly fails in that > endeavor, as this activity is also engaged in systematically by search > engines, web browsers and ISPs. > > > We need to do as much as possible to make sure the bill is revised to > serve it's purpose of preventing phishing scams and not to bury domain > name owners. Please sign the petition at http://www.SnoweBill.com to help > in the fight and to review all portions of the bill. > > Thank you for your time and attention in this matter. > There are several big discussions taking place right now at > http://www.DNForum.com - please visit the site and perform a search for > "Snowe" to view the threads. > > Regards, > DNForum.com Staff > Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

1 0

Re: [At-Large] Motion for ALAC board
by Jeffrey A. Williams March 6, 2008

March 6, 2008

JFC and all my friends, It is illogical an incompatible with transparency, openness, and accountability to have closed and open list for the same discussions as well as a violation of the MOU accordingly. Ergo, your suggestion seemingly is designed to thwart what the ALAC is suppose to be all about as well as seeks to squelch diverse or opposing views and opinions from being recognized and/or heard. JFC Morfin wrote: > At 12:50 06/03/2008, Jacqueline A. Morris wrote: > > From the ALS listing on alac.icann.org, INEGroup is not an accredited ALS. > >There were regional ALS-only lists created previously, but most were > >discontinued last year by request, as the number of mailing lists > >was huge and, some felt, unmanageable. > >The problem with client-side monitoring as Evan suggests is > >bandwidth for people in locations with low and expensive bandwidth. > >I can set up all sorts of rules on my computer, but then I still > >have to download the mail before it gets to implement those rules. > >Same problem if I want to implement rules on my server (if my server > >is locally hosted, and if I even have access to so do) > >The ALAC rules exist and the Chair has indicated that it will be > >considered, so I look forward to the ALAC decision, and hopefully a > >more streamlined and productive list with fewer distractions. > >My $0.02 > >Jacqueline > > Dear Jacqueline, > The true problem is as you say the low/costly bandwidth users. > Roberto Gaetano experimented a solution at the DNSO/GA years ago with > a filtered version of the list which matched that requirement. > However, at the same time we must stay democratic and we cannot > filter out anyone. This is why I plead for two different membership > lists, filtering debates through two non restricted lists: > - one list internal to the ALAC where shared responsibility for > monitoring and accepting posters will depend on ALS Chairs. > - one list external to the ALAC welcoming every interested @large. > It is likely that interesting topics brought up on the second list > will also be discussed on the internal list in order to get an ALAC > common position. One way to stay in tune and transparent would be > that Members of the second list can receive the mails of the first > list. They would answer them on the second list. If some of their > point is of interest for the internal list, internal list members > will comment, making their colleagues informed. I feel this double > list system might respect the rights and expectations of everyone and > could be simple to set-up and manage. > > jfc > > Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

1 0

Draft Summary Minutes for 14 February 2008 ALAC Session Published
by At-Large Staff March 6, 2008

March 6, 2008

Dear Members: Please be advised that the summary minutes of the final At-Large Advisory Committee meeting in New Delhi have just been published at https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?meeting_summary_14_february_2008. Note that due to the technical issues in the room, there are breaks in the minutes. If those present could add in any of the missing segments I¹d be most grateful; my apologies for this but you¹ll remember how challenging the technical issues were at this session. -- Regards, ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org

1 0

Domains Blocked By US Treasury 'Blacklist'
by Jeffrey A. Williams March 5, 2008

March 5, 2008

All my friends, Enom in the news. Will eNom move offshore? Should it? Did the US Treasury act properly? Maybe ICANN can hold one of it's meetings in Havana? Adam Liptak of the New York Times reports today about the plight of a Spanish tour operator http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/us/04bar.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=liptak&st=nyt… whose domain names have been embargoed by his domain name registrar (eNom). They pulled his domains after they discovered the tour operator's name on a US Treasury blacklist. It turns out he packages tours to Cuba largely for European tourists who can legally travel there, unlike Americans. The article cites 'a press release issued in December 2004, almost three years before eNom acted. It said Mr. Marshall's company had helped Americans evade restrictions on travel to Cuba and was 'a generator of resources that the Cuban regime uses to oppress its people.' It added that American companies must not only stop doing business with the company but also freeze its assets, meaning that eNom did exactly what it was legally required to do.' The only part of the operator's business in the United States is his domain name registration; all other aspects of his business lie outside the United States. Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

1 0

Naming Names: Identity Theft Study Identifies Banks
by Jeffrey A. Williams March 5, 2008

March 5, 2008

All my friends, As has already been briefly discussed back in May '07 time frame on the RAA WG, seems BofA is a less than reliable institution along with AT&T with your personal and private information. See: http://www.bankinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=724 (February 29, 2008) The Center for Law and Technology at the University of California at Berkeley reviewed thousands of FTC complaints and identified the 25 financial institutions whose customers have experienced the most identity theft. Non financial institutions with FTC identity theft complaints were also identified. Bank of America was top on the financial institution list while AT&T was top on the non-financial list. Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

1 0

Will this apply to Registries doing fronrunning:Prison Time for Data Thieves
by Jeffrey A. Williams March 5, 2008

March 5, 2008

All my friends, Will similar charges and resulting resolutions apply to Registries and Registrars engaging in Frontrunning/Domain Name Tasting, registration records, and Whois data? One would hope so, so as to send a message to mismanaged data privacy and security practices which we have seen already a la RegistryFly, ect.. FWIW, it seems likely that in the future, that some SR. Registry and/or Registrar Exec's. will be so punished. For their sake, I hope they have a plentiful supply of soap on a rope, toothbrushes, and cigeretts to trade their future bunk mates in order to avoide a unplesent and undesired social encounter! Will Google be exposed in it's latest bid for managing Health records? One hopes not! Better yet, just say NO to Google storing and managing your health records. See: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/5583753.html (March 1, 2008) Two people have received prison sentences for their roles in a data theft scheme that victimized patients of the Kelsey-Seybold Clinic in Houston, Texas. Former insurance analyst Kretia Lutriel Griffin stole personal data belonging to approximately 200 of the clinic's patients. She sold them to Aubry Johnson, who used the information to open charge accounts at various stores. Johnson was sentenced to seven years in prison for access device fraud and aggravated identity theft. Griffin received a two-year sentence for conspiracy. The clinic has notified patients whose data were compromised. A clinic spokesperson said that no medical data were involved. Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

1 0