- At-Large - lists.icann.org

FW: FW: FW: Call for nominations for ALAC OfficerPositions(2nd round)
by Guru＠ITfC Nov. 8, 2007

Nov. 8, 2007

I would like to nominate self for new GTLDs group (my bio is available on <http://www.itforchange.net/content/view/27/39/> http://www.itforchange.net/content/view/27/39/) Guru _____________ Gurumurthy K IT for Change, Bangalore Bridging Development Realities and Technological Possibilities <http://www.itforchange.net/> www.ITforChange.net _____ From: alac-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Cheryl Langdon-Orr Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 11:55 AM To: 'At-Large Worldwide' Subject: [At-Large] FW: FW: Call for nominations for ALAC OfficerPositions(2nd round) From: Cheryl Langdon-Orr [mailto:cheryl@hovtek.com.au] Sent: Thursday, 8 November 2007 5:14 PM To: 'Erick Iriarte Ahon' Cc: 'At-Large Worldwide' Subject: RE: [At-Large] FW: Call for nominations for ALAC Officer Positions(2nd round) Yes Erik it may indeed have been lost... I will fwd this message to the public At-Large list do your offer of service to this WG is dully noted J and thank you!!! CLO From: Erick Iriarte Ahon [mailto:faia@amauta.rcp.net.pe] Sent: Thursday, 8 November 2007 11:57 AM To: cheryl(a)hovtek.com.au Subject: Re: [At-Large] FW: Call for nominations for ALAC Officer Positions(2nd round) Hi I sent three or four times an email because i would like to serve in the new gtlds group.. but i think.. the email. lost in the cyberspace. Please could you confirm that? Erick At 05:59 p.m. 07/11/2007, you wrote: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0073_01C821EE.166E9CA0" Content-Language: en-au Yesterday I received a nomination for the role of WHOIS liaison from José Ovidio Salgueiro, my response email was returned un-delivered and he has again emailed me today to check if I received his message again the response has been returned apparently not received by him Just in case what ever mail delivery issues we are having between us also effects his ability to post to this list; Please Note the following text from the original message to me This should both act as nomination and acceptance CLO From: José Ovidio Salgueiro A. [ mailto:jsalgueiro@cantv.net <mailto:jsalgueiro@cantv.net> ] Sent: Wednesday, 7 November 2007 2:28 AM To: cheryl(a)hovtek.com.au Subject: RE: [At-Large] Call for nominations for ALAC Officer Positions(2nd round) Cheryl: I´d like to nominate myself for the WHOIS liason José Ovidio Salgueiro A. jsalgueiro(a)cantv.net _____ De: alac-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [ <mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Jacqueline A. Morris Enviado el: Viernes, 02 de Noviembre de 2007 05:41 p.m. Para: 'At-Large Worldwide' Asunto: [At-Large] Call for nominations for ALAC Officer Positions (2nd round) Dear At Large After the first round, the following positions remain unfilled, with no nominations. I now call for nominations for the following Officer and Liaison positions for the ALAC for the 2007-2008 term. Liasons do not need to be ALAC members, but Officers do. Only ALAC members can nominate. Nominations are due to this list in 14 days - 12:00 UTC on Friday Nov 16 Nominations for Officer Positions 2007/8 ALAC Committee Officers Rapporteur No nominations Liaisons WHOIS No nominations Working Groups IDNs No nominations WHOIS No nominations Registrant/Registrar Relations No nominations IPv4 IPv6 Transition No nominations New GTLDs No nominations

1 0

FW: FW: Call for nominations for ALAC Officer Positions(2nd round)
by Cheryl Langdon-Orr Nov. 8, 2007

Nov. 8, 2007

From: Cheryl Langdon-Orr [mailto:cheryl@hovtek.com.au] Sent: Thursday, 8 November 2007 5:14 PM To: 'Erick Iriarte Ahon' Cc: 'At-Large Worldwide' Subject: RE: [At-Large] FW: Call for nominations for ALAC Officer Positions(2nd round) Yes Erik it may indeed have been lost... I will fwd this message to the public At-Large list do your offer of service to this WG is dully noted J and thank you!!! CLO From: Erick Iriarte Ahon [mailto:faia@amauta.rcp.net.pe] Sent: Thursday, 8 November 2007 11:57 AM To: cheryl(a)hovtek.com.au Subject: Re: [At-Large] FW: Call for nominations for ALAC Officer Positions(2nd round) Hi I sent three or four times an email because i would like to serve in the new gtlds group.. but i think.. the email. lost in the cyberspace. Please could you confirm that? Erick At 05:59 p.m. 07/11/2007, you wrote: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0073_01C821EE.166E9CA0" Content-Language: en-au Yesterday I received a nomination for the role of WHOIS liaison from José Ovidio Salgueiro, my response email was returned un-delivered and he has again emailed me today to check if I received his message again the response has been returned apparently not received by him Just in case what ever mail delivery issues we are having between us also effects his ability to post to this list; Please Note the following text from the original message to me This should both act as nomination and acceptance CLO From: José Ovidio Salgueiro A. [ <mailto:jsalgueiro@cantv.net> mailto:jsalgueiro@cantv.net] Sent: Wednesday, 7 November 2007 2:28 AM To: cheryl(a)hovtek.com.au Subject: RE: [At-Large] Call for nominations for ALAC Officer Positions(2nd round) Cheryl: I´d like to nominate myself for the WHOIS liason José Ovidio Salgueiro A. jsalgueiro(a)cantv.net _____ De: alac-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [ <mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Jacqueline A. Morris Enviado el: Viernes, 02 de Noviembre de 2007 05:41 p.m. Para: 'At-Large Worldwide' Asunto: [At-Large] Call for nominations for ALAC Officer Positions (2nd round) Dear At Large After the first round, the following positions remain unfilled, with no nominations. I now call for nominations for the following Officer and Liaison positions for the ALAC for the 2007-2008 term. Liasons do not need to be ALAC members, but Officers do. Only ALAC members can nominate. Nominations are due to this list in 14 days - 12:00 UTC on Friday Nov 16 Nominations for Officer Positions 2007/8 ALAC Committee Officers Rapporteur No nominations Liaisons WHOIS No nominations Working Groups IDNs No nominations WHOIS No nominations Registrant/Registrar Relations No nominations IPv4 IPv6 Transition No nominations New GTLDs No nominations No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.18/1104 - Release Date: 11/1/2007 18:47 _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org <http://www.alac.icann.org/> ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org <http://www.icannalac.org/>

1 0

ENC: [Caucusigf-br] Reunión latinoamericana y caribeña para el IGF
by Vanda Scartezini UOL Nov. 8, 2007

Nov. 8, 2007

To all that will attend RIO IGF here a pre meeting for Latin America & Caribean Region Portuguese/Spanish& English will be welcome as far as I know. I will be there. Safe trip to all. Vanda Scartezini At Large ICANN Tel - +55113266.6253 Mob- +55118181.1464 vanda(a)uol.com.br vanda.scartezini(a)icann.org _____ De: caucusigf-br-bounces(a)listas.rits.org.br [mailto:caucusigf-br-bounces@listas.rits.org.br] Em nome de Graciela Selaimen Enviada em: terça-feira, 6 de novembro de 2007 11:49 Para: Caucus do Brasil no IGF Assunto: [Caucusigf-br] Reunión latinoamericana y caribeña para el IGF Estimad@s, Sigue la confirmación del local y fecha de la reunión de la sociedad civil latinoamericana y caribeña pre-IGF, con la programación atual. Aún tenemos espacio para facilitador/a en el tema 'Apertura'. Sugerencias son bienvenidas. Abrazos, Graciela ************ Reunión latinoamericana y caribeña 11/11/07, 09:00 - 14:00, hotel Windsor Plaza. Salão Imperial. Tema: "Intercambio de informaciones/ideas sobre el IGF e sus temas principales" Motivo: Nuestra región no ha tenido oportunidad de reunirse para intercambio de ideas sobre el Foro de Gobernanza de Internet, IGF (para que sirve, que podría o debería hacer, cual su futuro y sus implicaciones para nuestra región). Los cinco temas principales de IGF tratan de asuntos que tienen implicaciones importantes para las políticas públicas de la región relacionadas a impulsar las TICs para el desarrollo humano en general, y para la gobernanza de Internet a niveles regional y nacional en particular. Temas como interconexión y optimización de tráfego regional (bien así los términos de intercambio de esa interconexión), comparación de políticas públicas sobre derechos e Internet, integración o coordinación de iniciativas relativas a la seguridad y utilización adecuada de la red, políticas regulatorias de telecomunicaciones e Internet, todos esos son temas del IGF y son temas importantes para a la región. Objetivo: compartir informaciones sobre las temáticas específicas en discusión en cada uno de los principales tópicos; debatir las temáticas y pensar una participación más fuerte de la región en los procesos del IGF y afines. Formato: amplo debate, com 1-2 panelistas motivadores para cada uno de los cinco tópicos, buscando relacionarlos con la situación de la región. Cerca de 45-50 minutos para cada tópico. Programa ======== 09:00-09:15 -- Sesión rápida de apertura, presentaciones Graciela Selaimen (Rits, Brasil) Valeria Betancourt (APC, Ecuador) 09:15-10:00 -- Tema: Acceso Gustavo Gindre (Rits/Intervozes, Brasil) Julian Casabuenas (Colnodo, Colombia) - (aguardamos confirmación) 10:00 - 10:45 -- Tema: Diversidad Daniel Pimienta (Funredes, Rep.Dominicana) Ronaldo Lemos (CTS/FGV, Brasil) 10:45-11:00 -- break 11:00-11:45 -- Tema: Asuntos emergentes Sebastián Bellagamba (Internet Society, Argentina) Erick Iriarte Ahon (Alfa-Redi, Peru) 11:45-12:30 -- Tema: Apertura Sally Burch (ALAI, Ecuador) ???? (sugerencias??? ) 12:30-13:15 -- Tema: Seguridad Thiago Tavares (Safernet, Brasil) Katitza Rodrigues (EPIC, Peru) 13:15-14:00 -- Tema: Recursos críticos de Internet Raul Echeberría (LACNIC, Uruguay) Carlos Afonso (Rits, Brasil)

1 0

FW: Call for nominations for ALAC Officer Positions(2nd round)
by Cheryl Langdon-Orr Nov. 7, 2007

Nov. 7, 2007

Yesterday I received a nomination for the role of WHOIS liaison from José Ovidio Salgueiro, my response email was returned un-delivered and he has again emailed me today to check if I received his message again the response has been returned apparently not received by him Just in case what ever mail delivery issues we are having between us also effects his ability to post to this list; Please Note the following text from the original message to me This should both act as nomination and acceptance CLO From: José Ovidio Salgueiro A. [mailto:jsalgueiro@cantv.net] Sent: Wednesday, 7 November 2007 2:28 AM To: cheryl(a)hovtek.com.au Subject: RE: [At-Large] Call for nominations for ALAC Officer Positions(2nd round) Cheryl: I´d like to nominate myself for the WHOIS liason José Ovidio Salgueiro A. jsalgueiro(a)cantv.net _____ De: alac-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Jacqueline A. Morris Enviado el: Viernes, 02 de Noviembre de 2007 05:41 p.m. Para: 'At-Large Worldwide' Asunto: [At-Large] Call for nominations for ALAC Officer Positions (2nd round) Dear At Large After the first round, the following positions remain unfilled, with no nominations. I now call for nominations for the following Officer and Liaison positions for the ALAC for the 2007-2008 term. Liasons do not need to be ALAC members, but Officers do. Only ALAC members can nominate. Nominations are due to this list in 14 days - 12:00 UTC on Friday Nov 16 Nominations for Officer Positions 2007/8 ALAC Committee Officers Rapporteur No nominations Liaisons WHOIS No nominations Working Groups IDNs No nominations WHOIS No nominations Registrant/Registrar Relations No nominations IPv4 IPv6 Transition No nominations New GTLDs No nominations No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.18/1104 - Release Date: 11/1/2007 18:47

1 0

Public Comment period opens: Bylaw Change Requested by the ALAC Related to ALS Application Handling
by Nick Ashton-Hart Nov. 7, 2007

Nov. 7, 2007

Public Comments Requested on Bylaw Change Proposed by the At-Large Advisory Committee 7 November 2007 The Board of Directors resolved on 2nd November 2007 to request public comments on a change to the Bylaws of ICANN requested by the At-Large Advisory Committee, related to the administration of applications from organizations that wish to join the At-Large community of Internet end- users participating in ICANN. The change would amend the wording of Article IX, S2(4)(i) so that it would read as follows: Membership in the At-Large Community The criteria and standards for the certification of At-Large Structures within each Geographic Region shall be established by the Board based on recommendations from the ALAC and shall be stated in the Memorandum of Understanding between ICANN and the RALO for each Geographic Region. The criteria and standards for the certification of At-Large Structures shall be established in such a way that participation by individual Internet users who are citizens or residents of countries within the Geographic Region (as defined in Section 5 of Article VI) of the RALO will predominate in the operation of each At-Large Structure within the RALO, while not necessarily excluding additional participation, compatible with the interests of the individual Internet users within the region, by others. Each RALO's Memorandum of Understanding shall also include provisions designed to allow, to the greatest extent possible, every individual Internet user who is a citizen of a country within the RALO's Geographic Region to participate in at least one of the RALO's At- Large Structures. To the extent compatible with these objectives, the criteria and standards should also afford to each RALO the type of structure that best fits the customs and character of its Geographic Region. Once the criteria and standards have been established as provided in this Clause i, the ALAC, with the advice and participation of the RALO where the applicant is based, shall be responsible for certifying organizations as meeting the criteria and standards for At-Large Structure accreditation. Decisions to certify or decertify an At-Large Structure shall be made as decided by the ALAC in its Rules of Procedure, save always that any changes made to the Rules of Procedure in respect of ALS applications shall be subject to review by the RALOs and by the ICANN Board. Decisions as to whether to accredit, not to accredit, or disaccredit an At-Large Structure shall be subject to review according to procedures established by the Board. On an ongoing basis, the ALAC may also give advice as to whether a prospective At-Large Structure meets the applicable criteria and standards. This amendment is part of a series of other changes that do not impact the Bylaws of ICANN, which were resolved upon by the ALAC in their meeting on 10th August 2007. The complete package of changes can be found here. ICANN have determined that a 30-day public comment period on the proposed Bylaw change is appropriate. Those wishing to comment are suggested to make their comments not later than 2 nd December 2007 at 12:00 EST. Comments are therefore encouraged; they may be sent by email to alac-bylaw-comments(a)icann.org , and reviewed at http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-bylaw-comments. -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68 email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

An alternative perspective on IPv6
by Danny Younger Nov. 7, 2007

Nov. 7, 2007

The following comment was spotted on the CPSR Governance list; the author is Ian Peter: "Well, let me be radical about this and suggest that IPv6 has already failed and will never be rolled out. What's more, it won't really matter (except to a few embarrassed people and organizations). IPv6 belongs to the year 1995. Thats the year that a piece of software called Windows 1995 was rolled out. It didn't even include a browser because Microsoft hadn't released Internet Explorer yet. The web probably had only about one million users. The world has changed since then and it's just possible that a more creative way of expanding the number pool might be available to us now that wasn't thought about then. It is also possible that we are dealing with an adoption problem of a scale not anticipated at the time (particularly given the long unanticipated lead time in rollout). If it's consumers who are supposed to lead the adoption of IPv6, I suggest it will never succeed. As everyone agrees, there is no business case. NO business case, no rollout, no IPv6. That's the laws of the universe. I will also say it doesnt matter - because the problem is not non-adoption of IPv6, as we have begun to believe - it's that numbers are supposed to run out and probably will unless something changes. If we think through a decent mitigation strategy there are a number of things that can be done to ensure that doesn't happen for another 20 years or more. That gives time for a more elegant approach to number pool expansion than IPv6 to emerge. To their credit, both Geoff Huston and Randy Bush have begun to think about these alternative mitigation strategies - although both seem to still cling at times to the hope that the laws of markets and the laws of human behaviour will suddenly change and IPv6 will suddenly be adopted but a lot later than first expected. (That's sometimes called denial). The last great hope seems to be that when the last number runs out someone (probably in an underdeveloped country) will scream and we will all change. Yeah, right on.... Sorry to rain on the parade, but really the answer to the number pool expansion problem requires us to be realistic rather than hopeful, and to be prepared to be flexible with approaches rather than clinging to an approach that hasn't worked. So let me say it again - the problem is not that people are not adopting IPv6. The problem is that we have not yet arrived at a strategy for dealing with number pool expansion that is acceptable to all major stakeholders and is scaleable to future needs. We need a major rethink - and I really don't think it will be a difficult problem to solve if we put our efforts into alternative approaches rather than "flogging a dead horse"." __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

WHOIS Comments Requested
by Danny Younger Nov. 7, 2007

Nov. 7, 2007

Please note that the following two documents have been posted on page: http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/ Staff Overview of recent WHOIS activities http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/icann-staff-overview-of-whois11oct07.pdf Staff Implementation notes WHOIS working group report http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/gnso-whoiswg-report-staff-implementation-notes… Public comments are open on the WHOIS process until 30 October 2007. http://www.icann.org/public_comment/ Please submit comments to: <whois-comments-2007(a)icann.org> Comments may be viewed at: http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-comments-2007/ Explanation: A Whois taskforce convened in June 2005 completed its work and sent a final report to the GNSO Council in March 2007. In that report, a majority of members endorsed a proposal called the "Operational Point of Contact" (OPOC) where a domain name registrant would be able to choose a third-party to appear in the public Whois information for this domain and the registrants contact details would no longer be displayed. Expanding on that work, the GNSO Council in March created a Whois working group to examine three issues and make recommendations on them: 1. To examine the roles, responsibilities and requirements of the OPOC, and what happens if they are not fulfilled; 2. To examine how legitimate interests will access unpublished registration data; and 3. To examine whether publication of registration contact information should be based on the type of registered name holder (legal vs. natural persons) or the registrant's use of a domain name. The working group's report [pdf] was published on 20 August 2007. On 6 September 2007, the GNSO Council approved a resolution for further public comment on the report with the intention to lead to a vote on the issue on 31 October 2007 during the Los Angeles ICANN meeting. The resolution called for ICANN staff to prepare a "draft final report" covering the Whois reports referenced above and called Staff Overview of Recent GNSO WHOIS Activity [pdf]. Public comments are invited on both of the GNSO Council's Whois reports and recommendations referenced above and summarized in the Staff Overview of Recent GNSO WHOIS Activity. Comments will be taken until 00:00 UTC (17:00 PDT) on 30 October 2007. Please take time to submit comments. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469

3 2

Re: [At-Large] Call for nominations for ALAC Officer Positions (2ndround)
by sebastien.bachollet＠free.fr Nov. 6, 2007

Nov. 6, 2007

I would like to nominate: Rapporteur Hawa Diakite IPv4 IPv6 Transition Patrick Vande Walle And I would like to reiterate my proposal to have a liaison with the GAC or any name ALAC-GAC go between! we can find With the nomination of Izumi Aizu All the best Sébastien Bachollet

3 2

Nomination - IPv4/v6
by Robert Guerra Nov. 6, 2007

Nov. 6, 2007

I would like to second the nomination of - Izumi Aizu - for the open position of IPv4/6 WG/liaison/etc.. regards, Robert --- Robert Guerra <rguerra(a)privaterra.ca> Managing Director, Privaterra Tel +1 416 893 0377

1 0

Latest version of IPv4V6 statement
by Izumi AIZU Nov. 6, 2007

Nov. 6, 2007

I am in the meeting with the Board and AtLarge community, and will take the floor soon to give some presentation on IPv4-v6. Here attached is the material. Nick, could you put it on the screen when we do. izumi

7 17