- Bc-gnso - lists.icann.org

FILED: BC comment on .XXX renewal agreement
by Steve DelBianco 29 Apr '24

29 Apr '24

Today we filed the attached comment on the Proposed Renewal of the Registry Agreement for .XXX (link<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/proposed-renewal-of-the-…> to comments page). Thanks to Margie Milam for drafting. -- Steve On 4/25/24, 10:13 PM, "Steve DelBianco" <sdelbianco(a)netchoice.org> wrote: BC members – Thanks to Margie for drafting the attached BC comment on the Proposed Renewal of the Registry Agreement for .XXX (link<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/proposed-renewal-of-the-…> to comments page). The proposed renewal uses the base gTLD Registry Agreement (Base RA), and drops the .XXX sponsorship designation. This would align with the similar .ADULT, .PORN, and .SEX Registry Agreements for generic, non-sponsored, non-community, TLDs. But the BC seeks to have XXX maintain their original promises, as we said in our renewal comments on .MUSEUM <https://www.icannbc.org/assets/docs/positions-statements/2017/2017_10octobe…> , .PRO<https://www.icannbc.org/assets/docs/positions-statements/bc-comment-on-.pro…>, and .TRAVEL<https://www.icannbc.org/assets/docs/positions-statements/bc-comment-on-regi…> Margie’s draft also challenges the contract amendment negotiation process used here, which avoids the elevated scrutiny of an RSEP. Comments close 29-Apr, so please reply all with your edits/suggestions by COB on 28-Apr. Thanks again to Margie for taking the lead on this.

1 0

Eco hosting a webinar
by Steve DelBianco 22 Apr '24

22 Apr '24

Thomas Rickert announced today that eco and ICANN Org are hosting a 1-hour webinar: RDRS – How to access WHOIS data today<https://www.eco.de/event/rdrs-how-to-access-whois-data-today/> 30 April 2024 15:30pm CEST / 13:30pm UTC / 9:30am EDT Setup: The webinar is aimed at all users and requestors of WHOIS data who are not yet familiar with the RDRS. There will be time for questions and answers. The webinar will address: - How to access the RDRS - How the RDRS works - What the RDRS can and cannot do - Request best practices - The learnings from the use so far - Improvements that are on the way Agenda: * RDRS - How to access WHOIS data today Odeline MacDonald Associate General Counsel, European Data Protection, CIPP/E, CIPM, ICANN Adam Peake Global Stakeholder Engagement, ICANN Moderator: Thomas Rickert Director Names & Numbers, eco – Association of the Internet Industry * What does RDRS look like from a registrar's perspective? Sarah Wyld Policy & Privacy Manager, Tucows * How to best use RDRS as a requestor Prudence Malinki Head of Industry Relations, Markmonitor

1 0

POSTED: BC comment on Registry Service Provider (RSP) handbook
by Steve DelBianco 22 Apr '24

22 Apr '24

Just posted our comments on the Review of the Draft Registry Service Provider (RSP) Handbook - New gTLD Program<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/review-of-the-draft-regi…> ICANN required us to comment on separate questions in the input form shown here<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/review-of-the-draft-regi…>. But I will post the attached PDF to our Positions page for easier reference. Thanks again to drafters Segunfunmi Olajide, John Berard, Alan Woods, and Vivek Goyal. On 4/22/24, 9:22 AM, "Bc-private" <bc-private-bounces(a)icann.org> wrote: Just added this new comment, thanks to Vivek Goyal: Comment on RSP Evaluation Fee The BC requests ICANN to release the actual sum of RSP Evaluation fees as early as possible. The fees will be a key consideration factor for new RSPs, especially from underrepresented regions, to participate in the program and expand the pool of qualified RSPs. This is important because the current spread of existing RSPs is negligible in the global south. BC also requests ICANN to accept payments via Credit Cards, in addition to wire transfer. In many countries, international wire transfers are a lengthy and cumbersome process. Accepting credit card payments would make it easier for new RSPs to apply. I will submit our comment<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xcEo3vtxOmNNM1e4kNbC3Rv1WYWIprIX6k9Qac4…> in the next few hours. Thanks again to the drafters. On 4/22/24, 6:26 AM, "Alan Woods" <alan.woods(a)cleandns.email> wrote: Thanks to Segunfunmi for the absolute lion’s share here! Alan From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco(a)netchoice.org> Date: Sunday, 21 April 2024 at 15:44 To: BC Private <bc-private(a)icann.org> Cc: Olajide segunfunmi <olajidesegunfunmi(a)gmail.com>, John Berard <john(a)crediblecontext.com>, Alan Woods <alan.woods(a)cleandns.email> Subject: LAST CALL: draft BC comment on Registry Service Provider (RSP) handbook BC members – attached and here<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xcEo3vtxOmNNM1e4kNbC3Rv1WYWIprIX6k9Qac4…> is the draft BC comment on ICANN’s Draft Registry Service Provider (RSP) Handbook - New gTLD Program. (link<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/review-of-the-draft-regi…> to comment page). Segunfunmi Olajide prepared an initial draft that we shared with members last Wednesday. Since then, we incorporated edits from John Berard and Alan Woods. Comments close 22-Apr, so please reply with your edit suggestions by 12 UTC on 22-Apr. Thanks again to drafters.

1 0

FILED: BC comment on string similarity concerns in new gTLDs
by Steve DelBianco 10 Apr '24

10 Apr '24

BC members, Today we filed the attached BC comment on “String Similarity Review Guidelines 19 March 2024.<https://itp.cdn.icann.org/en/files/internationalized-domain-names-idn/strin…>” Thanks to drafting by Hafiz Farooq. --Steve DelBianco

1 0

POSTED: BC comment on Applicant Support Program (ASP) Handbook
by Steve DelBianco 02 Apr '24

02 Apr '24

The attached comment was posted today. Thanks again to David and Vivek for drafting. On 3/27/24, 10:17 AM, "Steve DelBianco" <sdelbianco(a)netchoice.org> wrote: BC members – Thanks to David Snead and Vivek Goyal, we have a draft comment on ICANN’s Applicant Support Program (ASP) Handbook – New gTLD Program. (link<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/review-of-the-draft-appl…> to comments page). Please see their draft Google Sheet<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JuYok6bIZYEuuxvw1DqvGld7YWNendU0aHC…>, with this note from David: Since the comments are basically limited to “does this meet the spec” and we’ve already commented on that, I think this is a lightweight way to do it. I do plan on adding at least one overall observation: the guidebook is very densely written, so it will be very difficult for applicants who need support to even understand it. Back in Sep-2023 we commented<https://cbu.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/positions-statements/2023/2023_09S…> on the GNSO Guidance process for applicant support, thanks to Vivek Goyal and David Snead (noting that Lawrence Olawale-Roberts represented us on the working group). Comments close 2-Apr, so please reply all with your edit suggestions by 1-Apr. Thanks again to David, Vivek, and Lawrence for drafting and reviewing.

1 0

FILED: BC comment on EPDP on Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs)
by Steve DelBianco 12 Mar '24

12 Mar '24

Today we filed the attached BC comment on Phase 1 report for EPDP on Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) Thanks to Ching Chiao for drafting.

1 0

POSTED: BC comment on Name Collision Study 2
by Steve DelBianco 28 Feb '24

28 Feb '24

The BC just posted the attached comment on the Draft NCAP Study 2 Report and Responses to Questions Regarding Name Collisions. (link<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/ncap-study-2-draft-repor…> to comment page) Thanks to Vivek Goyal for drafting.

1 0

Re: [bc-gnso] [Ext] BC response to board questions about RVCs and PICs
by Ariel Liang 28 Feb '24

28 Feb '24

Hello Steve, Thank you very much for the nicely formatted PDF version. Also confirm that we have received the BC response via Google Form. Thank you for the timely submission! Have a nice weekend! Ariel From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco(a)netchoice.org> Date: Friday, February 23, 2024 at 2:47 PM To: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org> Cc: BC List <bc-gnso(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] BC response to board questions about RVCs and PICs Ariel – we submitted our response via your requested Google Form today. In addition, we are providing a nicely formatted PDF that will be much easier for the board and staff to read, especially for our response to question 7. (see attached) Sincerely, Steve DelBianco Vice chair for policy coordination ICANN Business Constituency +1.703.615.6206

1 2

BC response to board questions about RVCs and PICs
by Steve DelBianco 23 Feb '24

23 Feb '24

Ariel – we submitted our response via your requested Google Form today. In addition, we are providing a nicely formatted PDF that will be much easier for the board and staff to read, especially for our response to question 7. (see attached) Sincerely, Steve DelBianco Vice chair for policy coordination ICANN Business Constituency +1.703.615.6206

1 0

Report: UK-related domain name registries
by Steve DelBianco 22 Feb '24

22 Feb '24

Last fall, we responded to a public consultation on powers in Relation to UK-related Domain Name Registries. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) has published the government policy response to this consultation on the gov.uk<http://gov.uk/> website <https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/powers-in-relation-to-uk-relate…> here<https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/powers-in-relation-to-uk-relate…>.<https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/powers-in-relation-to-uk-relate…> On Fri, 1 Sept 2023 at 12:47, UK Domain Names Consultation Mailbox <ukdomainnames.consultation(a)dcms.gov.uk<mailto:ukdomainnames.consultation@dcms.gov.uk>> wrote: Hello, Thank you for responding to the 'Powers in Relation to UK Related Domain Name Registries' consultation. This is to confirm your response has been received and it will be reviewed. Best wishes, International Regulation and Trade team, DSIT On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 18:23, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco(a)netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org>> wrote: International Regulation and Trade team UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Subject: Proposed requirements for UK-related domain name registries when tackling domain name abuse Please find attached a comment from the Business Constituency<https://www.icannbc.org/> (BC) of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). Our constituency represents global businesses ranging from startups in economically disadvantaged regions to the Fortune 50. The BC is concerned about the growth of domain name system (DNS) abuse, and has devoted resources both inside and outside the ICANN model to combat this persistent problem. While we have been encouraged by industry efforts to dissuade such corrosive behavior, such steps do not fully address the misuse and abuse problem that has continued to expand. On behalf of the businesses we represent, we welcome this consultation and encourage your office to continue this important discussion. Thank you for the opportunity to submit comment on the draft proposal. Sincerely, Steve DelBianco Vice Chair for Policy Coordination ICANN Business Constituency 1-703-615-6206

1 0