- APAC-Discuss - lists.icann.org

Re: [APAC-Discuss] [ALAC] [At-Large] [New gTLD RG] gTLD Review Group decisions regarding the comments on objection grounds on the ".book" application by Amazon EU s.a.r.l
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 8, 2012

Oct. 8, 2012

Not sure what "2TLDs" are, but regardless, that definition is incomplete in that it stops history at 2002 and is soon to be out of date in that the term sponsored and unsponsored is not being used for the TLDs to be approved under the current round. Community TLDs have some historical relationship to sponsored TLDs in that they are supported by some group. However, once delegated, that group is not necessarily in control of the TLD as is theoretically the case for Sponsored TLDs. However, the operator of the TLD does have a responsibility to maintain the community-based policies it specified in its application. Alan At 07/10/2012 11:43 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote: >Snip.... > > >Sala: From the ICANN Glossary, see: ><http://www.icann.org/general/glossary.htm>http://www.icann.org/general/glossary.htm > > >"gTLD > >Most TLDs with three or more characters are referred to as "generic" >TLDs, or "gTLDs". They can be subdivided into two types, "sponsored" >TLDs (sTLDs) and "unsponsored TLDs (uTLDs), as described in more detail below. > >In the 1980s, seven gTLDs (.com, .edu, .gov, .int, .mil, .net, and >.org) were created. Domain names may be registered in three of these >(.com, .net, and .org) without restriction; the other four have >limited purposes. >In 2001 & 2002 four new unsponsored TLDs (.biz, .info, .name, and >.pro) were introduced. The other three new TLDs (.aero, .coop, and >.museum) were sponsored. > >Generally speaking, an unsponsored TLD operates under policies >established by the global Internet community directly through the >ICANN process, while a sponsored TLD is a specialized TLD that has a >sponsor representing the narrower community that is most affected by >the TLD. The sponsor thus carries out delegated policy-formulation >responsibilities over many matters concerning the TLD." > >I would assume that the policy formulation would include 2TLDs.

1 0

Re: [APAC-Discuss] [ALAC] [At-Large] [New gTLD RG] gTLD Review Group decisions regarding the comments on objection grounds on the ".book" application by Amazon EU s.a.r.l
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 8, 2012

Oct. 8, 2012

At 07/10/2012 07:28 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote: >Dear Alan, > >My comments are in-line. > >On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Alan Greenberg ><<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> wrote: >Sala, two comments. > >1. You use the term "sponsoring organizations" >(sometimes capitalized). The concept of a >"Sponsored" TLD has a very specific meaning in >ICANN, referring to some of the TLDs that were >delegated in the last decade. I do not believe >that the term is used in relation to the new gTLD program. > > >Sala: "1.16 A Registered Name is "sponsored" by >the registrar that placed the record associated >with that registration into the registry. >Sponsorship of a registration may be changed at >the express direction of the Registered Name >Holder or, in the event a registrar loses >accreditation, in accordance with then-current >ICANN specifications and policies." from the RAA >Template via: ><http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/raa-17may01-en.htm#1>http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/raa-17may01-en.htm#1 > Yes, the word is used in reference to a Registar who passes 2nd/3rd level registration to a Registry. But your context ("granting Sponsoring organisations exclusive rights over gTLDs") was to a Registry and a TLD. >2. In your last bullet, you make reference to TLD >which are not open to general registration of 2nd >level domains. The Internet is full of such TLDs, >including many ccTLDs with strong restrictions on >who can register 2nd (or even 3rd) level names, >and a slew of gTLDs with very restrictive >registration policies. > > >ICANN has generally accepted and advocates that >regulation of the ccTLD is not within its ambits >as this is administered under the various >countries where each ccTLD is subject to their >respective country's laws as far as regulation >is concerned. Countries differ in their >approaches. To some extent, there are jurists >who argue that the same can be said for the gTLD >market. On the other hand the material >distinction is on which occassions and which >instances ICANN has a say. It would appear that >ICANN does not have a say in ccTLD registration >policies compared to the gTLD policies where >ICANN does have a say. My comments in my last >email was restricted to what is within ICANN's >power to influence, that is their domain/jurisdiction. Exactly. And ICANN has regularly allowed gTLDs with restrictive registration policies. >I am not sure that the >situation is so dissimilar in that although these >TLDs do allow SOME registrations, they forbid >many others. If you are specifically worried >about such use of TLDs that are also generic words, that should be explicit. > >Alan > >I would be interested in seeing studies on the >impact of closed market registries and perceived impact. > >At 07/10/2012 06:26 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote: > >The fact that Google is generally considered to be an intermediary service > >provider, they need to demonstrate that in not allowing second level .blog > >names to end users is not contrary to global public interest. Policy > >influences that largely impact on how Google operates. > > > >My main concern would be whether we have access to a Study on the Impact of > >Closed Generic Term Registries and the Impact on global public interest, > >ICANN's core mission etc. If such a study was done, grateful if the > >community could point out to me a link so I can read. > > > > - Closing off generic name spaces for exclusive use in the wake of > > extremely poor global campaigns and awareness where ICANN or the gTLD > > programme is involved; > > - Challenges for end users and consumers noting that there are consumer > > groups that have already started lobbying > US Senate on the perceived harm; > > - Controversies surrounding changing the rules during the game vrs GAC > > Intervention; > > - Regulatory trends within the US will have an impact on ICANN's policy > > decisions as far as anti trust, > competition is concerned, we have recently > > seen this when the The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States > > District Judge on 4 August 2012 *Manwin Licensing International > > S.A.R.L., et al. v. ICM Registry, LLC, et al.*had ruled that > > anti-trust claims could be filed over controversial .xxx [see: > > > <http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/tal/icann.pdf>http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/tal/icann.pdf > ]. Not for profit organisations > > may be subject to the *Sherman Act*. > > - On one hand, we are saying we advocate an open and free internet but > > the mere granting Sponsoring organisations exclusive rights over gTLDs > > without ensuring that these organisations > open up registrations of second > > level domain to others becomes reminiscent > of Incumbent Telecom operators > > pre-liberalisation of markets and whilst it will generate substantial > > revenue for both these sponsoring organisations and ICANN, it will > > [eventually] force someone either within > the US [Senate or DoC] where this > > could mean that since ICANN is incapable of self-regulatory aspects to > > protect global public interest that it may > > be regulated. This same argument > > can be used by those Governments who already feel that ICANN should be > > internationalized if not regulated; > > > > > >On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Seth M Reiss > <<mailto:seth.reiss@lex-ip.com>seth.reiss(a)lex-ip.com> wrote: > > > > > Sala How so?**** > > > > > > ** ** > > > > > > *From:* <mailto:newgtldrg-bounces@icann.org>newgtldrg-bounces(a)icann.org > > [mailto:newgtldrg-bounces@icann.org] *On > > > Behalf Of *Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro > > > *Sent:* Friday, October 05, 2012 2:02 PM > > > *To:* Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > > *Cc:* ALAC Working List; New gTLD Review Group; Susan Chalmers; apralo; > > > At-Large Worldwide > > > *Subject:* Re: [New gTLD RG] [ALAC] gTLD Review Group decisions regarding > > > the comments on objection grounds on the ".book" application by Amazon EU > > > s.a.r.l**** > > > > > > ** ** > > > > > > Dear Dev and All,**** > > > > > > ** ** > > > > > > The Association of American Publishers and Google entered into a > > > settlement, see: > <http://www.publishers.org/press/85/>http://www.publishers.org/press/85/ > I thought that this > > > would be of interest to the .book debate**** > > > > > > ** ** > > > > > > Kind Regards,**** > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Olivier MJ > Crepin-Leblond <<mailto:ocl@gih.com>ocl(a)gih.com> > > > wrote:**** > > > > > > Dear Dev, > > > > > > thank you very much for your email explaining the course of action which > > > you recommend. > > > I am CC'ing the present email to the ALAC for its information. > > > I also trust that Avri Doria, Chair of the At-Large New gTLD Working > > > Group, will be picking up the ball from here. I look forward to her WG > > > making recommendations as to the course of action they suggest. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > > > ALAC Chair > > > > > > On 08/08/2012 19:51, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > The gTLD Review Group (gTLD RG ; > <https://community.icann.org/x/u7-bAQ>https://community.icann.org/x/u7-bAQ) > > > > received a comment on community objection grounds by InternetNZ, an > > > > ALS in APRALO, on the application by Amazon EU S.A.R.L for the applied > > > > for gTLD string "book" on July 26 2012. > > > > > > > > InternetNZ's comment was posted to the At-Large new gTLD Applications > > > > Dashboard Workspace at > > > > > <https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.book+_OG>https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.book+_OG > > > > > > > > Several comments from At-Large, including members of the gTLD RG were > > > > received and posted on the wiki page at > > > > > <https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.book+_OG>https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.book+_OG > > > > including a condensed version of InternetNZ's comment by gTLD RG > > > > members Eduardo Diaz and Yrjo Lansipuro. > > > > > > > > The comments by InternetNZ and others raises concerns regarding the > > > > availability of 2nd level domains under generic TLDs. Whether domains > > > > under such proposed generic TLDs should be available or "open" to the > > > > wider public or "closed" to the applicants applying for the proposed > > > > gTLD. > > > > > > > > Because such concepts are outside the scope of the application for > > > > ".book" by Amazon EU s.a.r.l, the gTLD RG on its conference call on > > > > Monday August 6 2012 > (<https://community.icann.org/x/iAUeAg>https://community.icann.org/x/iAUeAg) > decided > > > > not to submit a comment on this application to the ALAC for possible > > > > submission to ICANN's new gTLD comment forum before the close of the > > > > Application Comment Period. > > > > > > > > However, given the concepts raised regarding the availability of 2nd > > > > level domains under gTLDs has policy implications that impacts > > > > individual Internet end users, the gTLD RG recommends that the issues > > > > raised be referred to the At-Large new gTLD Working Group > > > > > (<https://community.icann.org/x/8Yoi>https://community.icann.org/x/8Yoi) > for discussion and possible > > > > policy recommendations. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > > > > > Dev Anand Teelucksingh > > > > Chair, gTLD Review Group > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD > > > <http://www.gih.com/ocl.html>http://www.gih.com/ocl.html > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ALAC mailing list > > > <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > > > > > > At-Large Online: > <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org > > > ALAC Working Wiki: > > > > > > <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL…>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > > > **** > > > > > > > > > > > > **** > > > > > > ** ** > > > > > > -- **** > > > > > > Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala**** > > > > > > P.O. Box 17862**** > > > > > > Suva**** > > > > > > Fiji**** > > > > > > ** ** > > > > > > Twitter: @SalanietaT**** > > > > > > Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro**** > > > > > > Fiji Cell: <tel:%2B679%20998%202851>+679 998 2851**** > > > > > > ** ** > > > > > > **** > > > > > > ** ** > > > > > > ** ** > > > > > > > > > > >-- > >Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala > >P.O. Box 17862 > >Suva > >Fiji > > > >Twitter: @SalanietaT > >Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro > >Fiji Cell: <tel:%2B679%20998%202851>+679 998 2851 > >_______________________________________________ > >At-Large mailing list > ><mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org>At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > >At-Large Official Site: <http://atlarge.icann.org>http://atlarge.icann.org > > >_______________________________________________ >ALAC mailing list ><mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > >At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org >ALAC Working Wiki: ><https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL…>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > > > > >-- >Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala >P.O. Box 17862 >Suva >Fiji > >Twitter: @SalanietaT >Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro >Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851 > > >

2 1

Re: [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] [New gTLD RG] [ALAC] gTLD Review Group decisions regarding the comments on objection grounds on the ".book" application by Amazon EU s.a.r.l
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 7, 2012

Oct. 7, 2012

Sala, two comments. 1. You use the term "sponsoring organizations" (sometimes capitalized). The concept of a "Sponsored" TLD has a very specific meaning in ICANN, referring to some of the TLDs that were delegated in the last decade. I do not believe that the term is used in relation to the new gTLD program. 2. In your last bullet, you make reference to TLD which are not open to general registration of 2nd level domains. The Internet is full of such TLDs, including many ccTLDs with strong restrictions on who can register 2nd (or even 3rd) level names, and a slew of gTLDs with very restrictive registration policies. I am not sure that the situation is so dissimilar in that although these TLDs do allow SOME registrations, they forbid many others. If you are specifically worried about such use of TLDs that are also generic words, that should be explicit. Alan At 07/10/2012 06:26 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote: >The fact that Google is generally considered to be an intermediary service >provider, they need to demonstrate that in not allowing second level .blog >names to end users is not contrary to global public interest. Policy >influences that largely impact on how Google operates. > >My main concern would be whether we have access to a Study on the Impact of >Closed Generic Term Registries and the Impact on global public interest, >ICANN's core mission etc. If such a study was done, grateful if the >community could point out to me a link so I can read. > > - Closing off generic name spaces for exclusive use in the wake of > extremely poor global campaigns and awareness where ICANN or the gTLD > programme is involved; > - Challenges for end users and consumers noting that there are consumer > groups that have already started lobbying US Senate on the perceived harm; > - Controversies surrounding changing the rules during the game vrs GAC > Intervention; > - Regulatory trends within the US will have an impact on ICANN's policy > decisions as far as anti trust, competition is concerned, we have recently > seen this when the The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States > District Judge on 4 August 2012 *Manwin Licensing International > S.A.R.L., et al. v. ICM Registry, LLC, et al.*had ruled that > anti-trust claims could be filed over controversial .xxx [see: > http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/tal/icann.pdf ]. Not for profit organisations > may be subject to the *Sherman Act*. > - On one hand, we are saying we advocate an open and free internet but > the mere granting Sponsoring organisations exclusive rights over gTLDs > without ensuring that these organisations open up registrations of second > level domain to others becomes reminiscent of Incumbent Telecom operators > pre-liberalisation of markets and whilst it will generate substantial > revenue for both these sponsoring organisations and ICANN, it will > [eventually] force someone either within the US [Senate or DoC] where this > could mean that since ICANN is incapable of self-regulatory aspects to > protect global public interest that it may > be regulated. This same argument > can be used by those Governments who already feel that ICANN should be > internationalized if not regulated; > > >On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Seth M Reiss <seth.reiss(a)lex-ip.com> wrote: > > > Sala How so?**** > > > > ** ** > > > > *From:* newgtldrg-bounces(a)icann.org > [mailto:newgtldrg-bounces@icann.org] *On > > Behalf Of *Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro > > *Sent:* Friday, October 05, 2012 2:02 PM > > *To:* Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > *Cc:* ALAC Working List; New gTLD Review Group; Susan Chalmers; apralo; > > At-Large Worldwide > > *Subject:* Re: [New gTLD RG] [ALAC] gTLD Review Group decisions regarding > > the comments on objection grounds on the ".book" application by Amazon EU > > s.a.r.l**** > > > > ** ** > > > > Dear Dev and All,**** > > > > ** ** > > > > The Association of American Publishers and Google entered into a > > settlement, see: http://www.publishers.org/press/85/ I thought that this > > would be of interest to the .book debate**** > > > > ** ** > > > > Kind Regards,**** > > > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com> > > wrote:**** > > > > Dear Dev, > > > > thank you very much for your email explaining the course of action which > > you recommend. > > I am CC'ing the present email to the ALAC for its information. > > I also trust that Avri Doria, Chair of the At-Large New gTLD Working > > Group, will be picking up the ball from here. I look forward to her WG > > making recommendations as to the course of action they suggest. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > > ALAC Chair > > > > On 08/08/2012 19:51, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > > > The gTLD Review Group (gTLD RG ; https://community.icann.org/x/u7-bAQ) > > > received a comment on community objection grounds by InternetNZ, an > > > ALS in APRALO, on the application by Amazon EU S.A.R.L for the applied > > > for gTLD string "book" on July 26 2012. > > > > > > InternetNZ's comment was posted to the At-Large new gTLD Applications > > > Dashboard Workspace at > > > https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.book+_OG > > > > > > Several comments from At-Large, including members of the gTLD RG were > > > received and posted on the wiki page at > > > https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.book+_OG > > > including a condensed version of InternetNZ's comment by gTLD RG > > > members Eduardo Diaz and Yrjo Lansipuro. > > > > > > The comments by InternetNZ and others raises concerns regarding the > > > availability of 2nd level domains under generic TLDs. Whether domains > > > under such proposed generic TLDs should be available or "open" to the > > > wider public or "closed" to the applicants applying for the proposed > > > gTLD. > > > > > > Because such concepts are outside the scope of the application for > > > ".book" by Amazon EU s.a.r.l, the gTLD RG on its conference call on > > > Monday August 6 2012 (https://community.icann.org/x/iAUeAg) decided > > > not to submit a comment on this application to the ALAC for possible > > > submission to ICANN's new gTLD comment forum before the close of the > > > Application Comment Period. > > > > > > However, given the concepts raised regarding the availability of 2nd > > > level domains under gTLDs has policy implications that impacts > > > individual Internet end users, the gTLD RG recommends that the issues > > > raised be referred to the At-Large new gTLD Working Group > > > (https://community.icann.org/x/8Yoi) for discussion and possible > > > policy recommendations. > > > > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > > > Dev Anand Teelucksingh > > > Chair, gTLD Review Group > > > > > > > -- > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD > > http://www.gih.com/ocl.html > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ALAC mailing list > > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > > > > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > > ALAC Working Wiki: > > > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > > **** > > > > > > > > **** > > > > ** ** > > > > -- **** > > > > Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala**** > > > > P.O. Box 17862**** > > > > Suva**** > > > > Fiji**** > > > > ** ** > > > > Twitter: @SalanietaT**** > > > > Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro**** > > > > Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851**** > > > > ** ** > > > > **** > > > > ** ** > > > > ** ** > > > > > >-- >Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala >P.O. Box 17862 >Suva >Fiji > >Twitter: @SalanietaT >Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro >Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851 >_______________________________________________ >At-Large mailing list >At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

2 1

Re: [APAC-Discuss] [New gTLD RG] [ALAC] gTLD Review Group decisions regarding the comments on objection grounds on the ".book" application by Amazon EU s.a.r.l
by Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro Oct. 7, 2012

Oct. 7, 2012

The fact that Google is generally considered to be an intermediary service provider, they need to demonstrate that in not allowing second level .blog names to end users is not contrary to global public interest. Policy influences that largely impact on how Google operates. My main concern would be whether we have access to a Study on the Impact of Closed Generic Term Registries and the Impact on global public interest, ICANN's core mission etc. If such a study was done, grateful if the community could point out to me a link so I can read. - Closing off generic name spaces for exclusive use in the wake of extremely poor global campaigns and awareness where ICANN or the gTLD programme is involved; - Challenges for end users and consumers noting that there are consumer groups that have already started lobbying US Senate on the perceived harm; - Controversies surrounding changing the rules during the game vrs GAC Intervention; - Regulatory trends within the US will have an impact on ICANN's policy decisions as far as anti trust, competition is concerned, we have recently seen this when the The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge on 4 August 2012 *Manwin Licensing International S.A.R.L., et al. v. ICM Registry, LLC, et al.*had ruled that “anti-trust” claims could be filed over controversial .xxx [see: http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/tal/icann.pdf ]. Not for profit organisations may be subject to the *Sherman Act*. - On one hand, we are saying we advocate an open and free internet but the mere granting Sponsoring organisations exclusive rights over gTLDs without ensuring that these organisations open up registrations of second level domain to others becomes reminiscent of Incumbent Telecom operators pre-liberalisation of markets and whilst it will generate substantial revenue for both these sponsoring organisations and ICANN, it will [eventually] force someone either within the US [Senate or DoC] where this could mean that since ICANN is incapable of self-regulatory aspects to protect global public interest that it may be regulated. This same argument can be used by those Governments who already feel that ICANN should be internationalized if not regulated; On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Seth M Reiss <seth.reiss(a)lex-ip.com> wrote: > Sala – How so?**** > > ** ** > > *From:* newgtldrg-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:newgtldrg-bounces@icann.org] *On > Behalf Of *Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro > *Sent:* Friday, October 05, 2012 2:02 PM > *To:* Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > *Cc:* ALAC Working List; New gTLD Review Group; Susan Chalmers; apralo; > At-Large Worldwide > *Subject:* Re: [New gTLD RG] [ALAC] gTLD Review Group decisions regarding > the comments on objection grounds on the ".book" application by Amazon EU > s.a.r.l**** > > ** ** > > Dear Dev and All,**** > > ** ** > > The Association of American Publishers and Google entered into a > settlement, see: http://www.publishers.org/press/85/ I thought that this > would be of interest to the .book debate**** > > ** ** > > Kind Regards,**** > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com> > wrote:**** > > Dear Dev, > > thank you very much for your email explaining the course of action which > you recommend. > I am CC'ing the present email to the ALAC for its information. > I also trust that Avri Doria, Chair of the At-Large New gTLD Working > Group, will be picking up the ball from here. I look forward to her WG > making recommendations as to the course of action they suggest. > > Best regards, > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > ALAC Chair > > On 08/08/2012 19:51, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > The gTLD Review Group (gTLD RG ; https://community.icann.org/x/u7-bAQ) > > received a comment on community objection grounds by InternetNZ, an > > ALS in APRALO, on the application by Amazon EU S.A.R.L for the applied > > for gTLD string "book" on July 26 2012. > > > > InternetNZ's comment was posted to the At-Large new gTLD Applications > > Dashboard Workspace at > > https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.book+_OG > > > > Several comments from At-Large, including members of the gTLD RG were > > received and posted on the wiki page at > > https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.book+_OG > > including a condensed version of InternetNZ's comment by gTLD RG > > members Eduardo Diaz and Yrjo Lansipuro. > > > > The comments by InternetNZ and others raises concerns regarding the > > availability of 2nd level domains under generic TLDs. Whether domains > > under such proposed generic TLDs should be available or "open" to the > > wider public or "closed" to the applicants applying for the proposed > > gTLD. > > > > Because such concepts are outside the scope of the application for > > ".book" by Amazon EU s.a.r.l, the gTLD RG on its conference call on > > Monday August 6 2012 (https://community.icann.org/x/iAUeAg) decided > > not to submit a comment on this application to the ALAC for possible > > submission to ICANN's new gTLD comment forum before the close of the > > Application Comment Period. > > > > However, given the concepts raised regarding the availability of 2nd > > level domains under gTLDs has policy implications that impacts > > individual Internet end users, the gTLD RG recommends that the issues > > raised be referred to the At-Large new gTLD Working Group > > (https://community.icann.org/x/8Yoi) for discussion and possible > > policy recommendations. > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > Dev Anand Teelucksingh > > Chair, gTLD Review Group > > > > -- > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD > http://www.gih.com/ocl.html > > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > ALAC Working Wiki: > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > **** > > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- **** > > Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala**** > > P.O. Box 17862**** > > Suva**** > > Fiji**** > > ** ** > > Twitter: @SalanietaT**** > > Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro**** > > Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851**** > > ** ** > > **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > -- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala P.O. Box 17862 Suva Fiji Twitter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851

1 0

PGIS/P3DM activities in Tobago #PGIS/P3DM #ICT #Climate Change
by Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro Oct. 6, 2012

Oct. 6, 2012

FYI ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Giacomo Rambaldi <rambaldi(a)cta.int> Date: Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:47 AM Subject: [civic] [ict4cc-caribbean] PGIS/P3DM activities in Tobago To: "Caribbean ICT stakeholders Virtual Community (CIVIC)" < civic(a)dgroups.org> There are quite interesting PGIS/P3DM activities going on in Tobago.**** Here are some blogposts:**** - Participatory 3D Modelling in Tobago - key venues<http://participatorygis.blogspot.nl/2012/10/participatory-3d-modelling-in-t…> **** - Caribbean nationals eager to develop P3DM in their countries: "P3DM a unique, totally new experience"<http://participatorygis.blogspot.nl/2012/10/caribbean-nationals-eager-to-de…> **** - Participatory 3D Modelling exercise kicks off with much gusto in Tobago<http://participatorygis.blogspot.nl/2012/10/participatory-3d-modelling-exer…> **** - ICTs for Climate Change Adaptation: Introduction of innovative technologies in the Caribbean<http://participatorygis.blogspot.nl/2012/09/icts-for-climate-change-adaptat…> **** - Tobagonians will build a participatory 3D model of Tobago to plan for impacts of climate change and extreme climatic events<http://participatorygis.blogspot.nl/2012/09/obagonians-to-build-model-of-to…> **** - Participatory 3D Modelling (P3DM): five years after receiving the World Summit Award <http://participatorygis.blogspot.nl/2012/09/participatory-3d-modelling-p3dm…> **** I will be there on 10-12 October. Anybody on this list is going to drop by?* *** ** ** Best regards**** ** ** Giacomo Rambaldi **** ** ** -- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala P.O. Box 17862 Suva Fiji Twitter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851

1 0

Welcome to ICANN At-Large!
by ICANN At-Large Staff Oct. 3, 2012

Oct. 3, 2012

Dear Satish: ICANN's At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) is pleased to inform you that (168) Computer Society of India has been certified as an At-Large Structure (ALS). The ALAC greatly appreciates your group’s interest in involving individual users in ICANN and looks forward to working with you and your colleagues. The purpose of ALS certification is to recognize that your organization meets the necessary criteria to involve individual Internet users at the local or issue level in ICANN activities, and that your organization will support its individual members' informed participation in ICANN efforts that affect end-users. The ALAC is eager to promote a productive working relationship between your organization, other ALS, and the ALAC (and ICANN in general), and your input on how we can make this a success would be greatly appreciated. We would like to offer some initial tools to help your organization keep its members informed (about significant news from ICANN and information on ICANN policy-development efforts) and engaged in activities of interest: - Point of Contact for your Organisation: Please send an email to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org identifying the names and email addresses of one or two individuals who will be the point of contact for information and correspondence regarding ICANN At-Large. If this changes, please let us know. - At Large Mailing Lists. There are many At Large email lists, for each region; you can signup for them and manage your subscriptions at: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo . The points of contact you identify will automatically be added to your region’s list just for accredited ALSes to discuss regional issues and to the mailing list for Staff announcements (only Staff can post messages to that list); you are invited to join others as you wish. - ALS information. Information about your organization will be shared with the At-Large community to enable individuals interested in your group's activities to contact you, and to encourage cooperation with other groups interested in ICANN activities in your geographic region. Please complete and email the form at the bottom of this note to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org. - ALAC website. The ALAC website (www.atlarge.icann.org) is a good source for ICANN news and information of interest to individual Internet users. We encourage you to provide your members with a link. The ALAC relies on volunteers to translate information into multiple languages. Translations of documents on the website are welcome and should be sent to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org. - At-Large Regional Websites. Regional wiki webpages also have been created to distribute information (including in local languages) on activities, events and issues of particular interest to people in each region. These are maintained by the community. They are: African Region: www.afralo.org Asia/Australia/Pacific Region: www.apralo.org European Region: www.euralo.org Latin America/Caribbean Region: www.lacralo.org North American Region: www.naralo.org We have included an ALS Starter Kit that includes key information on ALAC and At-Large communication tools. We have also included the Beginners Guide to Participating in At-Large which explains the organization of the At-Large community and how to participate in its activities. We look forward to working with you and your organization's members to advance individual Internet users' interests within ICANN. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please contact us at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org. Sincerely, The At-Large Advisory Committee www.atlarge.icann.org staff(a)atlarge.icann.org --------------------------- Name: Location (city/country/region; whatever is relevant to your membership): Mission: Member benefits: Contacts (name/s and email address/es -- title/s optional): Website: Other (additional informational you would like included):

4 4

Fwd: [ALAC] Fwd: Final Issue Report on the Protection of the Names of International Organizations in New GTLDs
by Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro Oct. 1, 2012

Oct. 1, 2012

FYI ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> Date: Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:41 AM Subject: [ALAC] Fwd: Final Issue Report on the Protection of the Names of International Organizations in New GTLDs To: ALAC Working List <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >From the GNSO Council list. Alan Dear All, > > We are pleased to submit to the GNSO Council for its review and > consideration, the Final Issue Report on the Protection of the Names of > International Organizations in New gTLDs. This Final Issue Report follows > the closing of the public comment forum on the Preliminary Issue Report. > > We look forward to supporting the GNSO Council's activities at the Toronto > Meeting with respect to this important issue. > > All the Best, > > Margie Milam > > _________ > > Margie Milam > Senior Policy Counselor > ICANN > _________ > _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… -- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala P.O. Box 17862 Suva Fiji Twitter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851

1 0

Redelegation of the domain representing Mali to the Agence des Technologies de l'Information et de la Communications
by Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro Sept. 29, 2012

Sept. 29, 2012

Dear All, Thanks to Dev who pointed out this morning that the Board will be considering the Redelegation of the domain representing Mali to the Agence des Technologies de l'Information et de la Communications, see: http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/agenda-03oct12-en.htm I wonder whether ISOC Mali or At Large in general holds a view on the above. Kind Regards, -- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala P.O. Box 17862 Suva Fiji Twitter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851

1 0

CTU WCIT Preparatory Invite and Registration
by Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro Sept. 26, 2012

Sept. 26, 2012

Dear All, I would like to invite you all to the Caribbean Telecommunications Union WCIT preparatory meeting that will be held in Trinidad and Tobago. I am attaching your Invitations. There are some who will attend on-site, and others remotely. Remote participation is extremely welcome. The objective is to give people the opportunity to discuss diverse perspectives relating to WCIT. For more information, visit: http://www.ctu.int/ Thank you and kind regards, Sala ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bevil Wooding <Bevil.Wooding(a)congresswbn.org> Date: Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:35 PM Subject: CTU WCIT Preparatory Invite and Registration To: "Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro (salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro(a)gmail.com)" < salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro(a)gmail.com> Find attached as discussed.**** ** ** ** ** BMW**** -----------------------------------**** Bevil M. Wooding**** *Chief Knowledge Officer* Congress WBN**** ** ** [M] +868 682-0627 ● [W]+868 663 5673 ● [F] +868 662 1750**** ** ** Ethical initiatives for Nations Development**** http://www.congresswbn.org**** ** ** ** ** -- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala P.O. Box 17862 Suva Fiji Twitter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851

1 0

Submissions to the GNSO IOC RC Drafting Team
by Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro Sept. 26, 2012

Sept. 26, 2012

Dear APRALO, PICISOC and colleagues This is to advise that I did not receive feedback from the Region in time to input into the submissions and as am sending this submissions in my personal capacity and not for APRALO nor ALAC. I am submitting this for your records. Thank you. Kind Regards -- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala P.O. Box 17862 Suva Fiji Twitter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851

1 0