December 2011 - At-Large - lists.icann.org

Updated Statistics [Dashboard]
by Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro Jan. 6, 2012

Jan. 6, 2012

Dear All, Thanks to Dev who kindly directed me to the Dashboards created last year, I pulled together some statistics and assembled them to see the extent of our Reach as a unit. Grateful if someone could help me with how many ALS's are in EURALO. The dashboards all across the Board *may *need updating. I will kindly seek the assistance of various RALO representatives to the ALAC to encourage the respective Secretariats to update the same or clarify the figures. The caveat with these statistics is that it is possible that there are new ALS's that are not counted in the dashboard. Aside from EURALO, it would be great if Staff could assist with gathering the following information within the RALO region: Countries with ccTLDs in ccNSO Countries with ccTLDs NOT in ccNSO Countries with ALSes and ccTLD in ccNSO Countries with no ALSes but ccTLD in ccNSO Countries with ALSes but ccTLD NOT in ccNSO Countries with no ALSes and ccTLD NOT in ccNSO It would be great if at some point we had some sort of consistent systematic template for the dashboards. I also noted a distinction in the number of countries that EURALO has on their dashboard and the one in * page 10 of the Final Report of the ccNSO Regions Working Group which shows the modification of UN Statistics to fit ICANN regions.* * * *Only one more "x" to fill, so help please.* > *Number of At Large Structures within RALOs by region* > > > > *Regions* > > *Countries and Territories**[1]* > > *Countries and Territories that have ALS* > > *No. Of Countries and Territories yet to be reached* > > *No of ALS within RALOs* > > *Latin American and Caribbean[1]<file:///C:/Users/User/Documents/ICANN/DRAFT%20PROPOSAL%20TO%20ADDRESS%20CAPACITY%20BUILDING%20WITHIN%20ICANN.doc#_ftn1> > * > > *33* > > * 15* > > * 18* > > * 38* > > *Asian Australasia and Pacific* > > *73* > > *16* > > * 57* > > * 23* > > *African[2]<file:///C:/Users/User/Documents/ICANN/DRAFT%20PROPOSAL%20TO%20ADDRESS%20CAPACITY%20BUILDING%20WITHIN%20ICANN.doc#_ftn2> > * > > *54* > > * 15* > > * 39* > > * 21* > > *European[3]<file:///C:/Users/User/Documents/ICANN/DRAFT%20PROPOSAL%20TO%20ADDRESS%20CAPACITY%20BUILDING%20WITHIN%20ICANN.doc#_ftn3> > * > > *75 (76)[4]<file:///C:/Users/User/Documents/ICANN/DRAFT%20PROPOSAL%20TO%20ADDRESS%20CAPACITY%20BUILDING%20WITHIN%20ICANN.doc#_ftn4> > * > > *14* > > * 62* > > * x* > > *Americas[5]<file:///C:/Users/User/Documents/ICANN/DRAFT%20PROPOSAL%20TO%20ADDRESS%20CAPACITY%20BUILDING%20WITHIN%20ICANN.doc#_ftn5> > * > > *51* > > * 3* > > * 48* > > * 22* > > * * > > > ------------------------------ > > [1] *The figures are the result of Modification of UN statistics regions > to obtain ICANN regions from page 10 of the Final Report of the ccNSO > Regions Working Group* > > > > ------------------------------ > > > <file:///C:/Users/User/Documents/ICANN/DRAFT%20PROPOSAL%20TO%20ADDRESS%20CAPACITY%20BUILDING%20WITHIN%20ICANN.doc#_ftnref1> > > > [2]<file:///C:/Users/User/Documents/ICANN/DRAFT%20PROPOSAL%20TO%20ADDRESS%20CAPACITY%20BUILDING%20WITHIN%20ICANN.doc#_ftnref2> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ao5dV8HXW3JzdHBJOWR6SDE5NWJzan… > > [3]<file:///C:/Users/User/Documents/ICANN/DRAFT%20PROPOSAL%20TO%20ADDRESS%20CAPACITY%20BUILDING%20WITHIN%20ICANN.doc#_ftnref3> > https://docs.google.com/open?id=0Ao5dV8HXW3JzdF9KTy1JZEp0YzNIRkhLNUdXVWlwSFE > > [4]<file:///C:/Users/User/Documents/ICANN/DRAFT%20PROPOSAL%20TO%20ADDRESS%20CAPACITY%20BUILDING%20WITHIN%20ICANN.doc#_ftnref4>The EURALO Dashboard in terms of number of countries differs from the > *page 10 of the Final Report of the ccNSO Regions Working Group* > > [5]<file:///C:/Users/User/Documents/ICANN/DRAFT%20PROPOSAL%20TO%20ADDRESS%20CAPACITY%20BUILDING%20WITHIN%20ICANN.doc#_ftnref5> > https://docs.google.com/open?id=0Ao5dV8HXW3JzdDI2YTI2S0ppMkNYaUFPWmFDVFIzOHc > > > > -- > Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala > > Tweeter: @SalanietaT > Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro > Cell: +679 998 2851 > > > > -- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala Tweeter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Cell: +679 998 2851

5 8

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten Dec. 30, 2011

Dec. 30, 2011

Total of 12 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Dec 30 00:53:02 EST 2011 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 50.00% | 6 | 50.28% | 51354 | salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com 8.33% | 1 | 10.33% | 10547 | rudi.vansnick at isoc.be 8.33% | 1 | 10.03% | 10241 | carlton.samuels at gmail.com 8.33% | 1 | 8.41% | 8588 | johnl at iecc.com 8.33% | 1 | 7.45% | 7609 | narten at us.ibm.com 8.33% | 1 | 7.08% | 7236 | admin at ttcsweb.org 8.33% | 1 | 6.42% | 6562 | noreply at badoo.com --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 12 |100.00% | 102137 | Total

1 0

Carlos te ha dejado un mensaje...
by Badoo Dec. 26, 2011

Dec. 26, 2011

Carlos te ha dejado un mensaje... Sólo tú podrás ver tanto el mensaje como su remitente y lo puedes borrar en cualquier momento. Puedes responder a través del chat de Badoo. Para leer tu mensaje, haz clic en el siguiente enlace: http://eu1.badoo.com/075244364/in/JL07uncu-Z8/?lang_id=7&m=21&mid=4ef890460… Más gente que también te está esperando: Chomba (Córdoba, Argentina) Flory (Córdoba, Argentina) Flor (Córdoba, Argentina) http://eu1.badoo.com/075244364/in/JL07uncu-Z8/?lang_id=7&m=21&mid=4ef890460… Si al pinchar en el enlace de este mensaje no funciona, copia y pégalo en la barra de tu navegador. Este email es parte del proceso de entrega del mensaje enviado por Carlos. Si has recibido este email por error, por favor ignóralo. En un breve periodo de tiempo, la petición será eliminada del sistema. ¡Divértete! El Equipo de Badoo Has recibido este email porque un usuario de Badoo te ha dejado un mensaje en Badoo. Este email ha sido generado de manera automática. Por favor, no respondas a este mensaje ya que no recibirás ninguna contestación. Si no quieres recibir más mensajes de Badoo, indícanoslo: http://eu1.badoo.com/impersonation.phtml?lang_id=7&mail_code=21&email=at-la…

1 0

Help fill in the blank [Statistics]
by Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro Dec. 24, 2011

Dec. 24, 2011

Dear All, I would be grateful if you could help me fill in the blanks just where it is marked "x". This is for something which I am working on at the moment. I am interested to know the statistics for At Large Structures per RALO. * * *Regions* *Countries and Territories[1]<file:///C:/Users/User/Documents/ICANN/DRAFT%20PROPOSAL%20TO%20ADDRESS%20CAPACITY%20BUILDING%20WITHIN%20ICANN.doc#_ftn1> * *Countries and Territories that have ALS* *No. Of Countries and Territories yet to be reached* *No of ALS within RALOs* *Latin American and Caribbean* *33* * x* * * * * *Asian Australasia and Pacific* *73* *16* * * * 23* *African* *54* * x* * * * * *European* *75* * x* * * * * *Americas* *51* * x* * * * * * * ------------------------------ [1]<file:///C:/Users/User/Documents/ICANN/DRAFT%20PROPOSAL%20TO%20ADDRESS%20CAPACITY%20BUILDING%20WITHIN%20ICANN.doc#_ftnref1> *The figures are the result of Modification of UN statistics regions to obtain ICANN regions from page 10 of the Final Report of the ccNSO Regions Working Group* -- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala Tweeter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Cell: +679 998 2851

2 2

Re: [At-Large] [ALAC-Announce] Fwd: [soac-discussion] ICANN Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey
by John R. Levine Dec. 23, 2011

Dec. 23, 2011

> We encourage everybody to take the survey. Nothing personal, but filling out this survey does not rate very high on my list of fun ways to spend half an hour during Christmas week. R's, John > > -------- Message original -------- > Sujet: [soac-discussion] ICANN Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey > Date : Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:03:12 -0800 > De : Kurt Pritz <kurt.pritz(a)icann.org> > Pour : soac-discussion(a)icann.org <soac-discussion(a)icann.org> > Copie à : David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org>, Jamie Hedlund > <jamie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, Akram Atallah <akram.atallah(a)icann.org> > > > > Dear ICANN Leader: > > > Thank you for communicating the availability of the ICANN Stakeholder > Satisfaction Survey to your community earlier this month. We are starting > to get good general response from community members but ask that you to > send out a reminder and encourage all members of your community to review > and complete the survey document. > > > Thus far, nearly 350 community members have viewed the survey, but only > about 10% of those viewers have followed through and completed the > document. Most constituencies / stakeholder groups have furnished at > least one response, but some have not our goal is to see broad > participation from all constituencies and stakeholder groups. I think that > this is a valuable opportunity to comment for all stakeholders. Even if > the form or content might not suit some of the initial readers, all should > participate. We seek to improve ICANN and, importantly, we also seek to > demonstrate the vibrancy of the bottom-up policy making community by > strong participation in this survey. > > > Please remind members of your community that the survey link at > http://ICANN-SS-2011.questionpro.com/ will remain open through 3 January > 2012. Personal encouragement you can offer to increase survey completion > would be most appreciated. > > > To reiterate just a bit, the survey is designed to create an initial > baseline of general ICANN stakeholder satisfaction that we can then use to > compare against future results. The more community feedback we get on this > initial survey, the more informative and statistically reliable the > feedback will be and the more responsive we can be to any particular areas > of community > concern. > > > Thanks very much for helping promote this effort. We hope that many > members of your community will participate. > > > > Please accept my best wishes for a joyful, relaxed holiday season. > > Best regards, > > > > Kurt Pritz > > > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC-Announce mailing list > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce > > At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > Regards, John Levine, johnl(a)iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly

1 0

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten Dec. 23, 2011

Dec. 23, 2011

Total of 38 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Dec 23 00:53:03 EST 2011 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 10.53% | 4 | 41.93% | 278677 | ajp at glocom.ac.jp 2.63% | 1 | 20.73% | 137780 | presidencia at internauta.org.ar 13.16% | 5 | 4.68% | 31106 | johnl at iecc.com 10.53% | 4 | 4.95% | 32932 | ocl at gih.com 10.53% | 4 | 4.80% | 31873 | carlton.samuels at gmail.com 7.89% | 3 | 3.43% | 22821 | evan at telly.org 5.26% | 2 | 2.80% | 18606 | jam at jacquelinemorris.com 5.26% | 2 | 2.31% | 15327 | avc at avc.vc 5.26% | 2 | 2.00% | 13297 | joly at punkcast.com 5.26% | 2 | 1.91% | 12699 | michele at blacknight.ie 5.26% | 2 | 1.89% | 12544 | alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca 2.63% | 1 | 1.63% | 10822 | langdonorr at gmail.com 2.63% | 1 | 1.58% | 10521 | bfausett at internet.law.pro 2.63% | 1 | 1.52% | 10117 | cdel at firsthand.net 2.63% | 1 | 1.11% | 7360 | narten at us.ibm.com 2.63% | 1 | 0.95% | 6317 | salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com 2.63% | 1 | 0.92% | 6093 | vanda at uol.com.br 2.63% | 1 | 0.86% | 5731 | staff at atlarge.icann.org --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 38 |100.00% | 664623 | Total

1 0

Further Progress by the ICANN CEO Search Committee
by ICANN At-Large Staff Dec. 22, 2011

Dec. 22, 2011

Dear All, The ICANN CEO Search Committee has now completed a job description for the position of CEO (reference <http://www.icann.org/en/committees/ceo-search/ceo-job-description-12dec11-e n.pdf> [PDF, 145 KB]) and a CEO candidate profile (reference <http://www.icann.org/en/committees/ceo-search/ceo-candidate-profile-01dec11 -en.pdf> [PDF, 576 KB]). It has contracted with a search firm, Odgers Berndtson of Brussels, to assist us in the search process. The full announcement is available at: http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-20dec11-en.htm The Search Committee strongly encourages qualified candidates to express their interest in the position, and encourages members of the community to encourage others who they believe are qualified to do so also. All suggestions, recommendations, and expressions of interest should be sent directly to: ceo-search(a)odgersberndtson.be Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie Peregrine ICANN At-Large Staff E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org

1 0

Facebook Privacy
by Michele Neylon :: Blacknight Dec. 21, 2011

Dec. 21, 2011

Irish Data Privacy audit report (it's long!) http://dataprotection.ie/viewdoc.asp?DocID=1182&m=f Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection ICANN Accredited Registrar http://www.blacknight.com/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://blacknight.mobi/ http://mneylon.tel Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 US: 213-233-1612 UK: 0844 484 9361 Locall: 1850 929 929 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845

2 1

Re: [At-Large] Notice of Motion: update to ALAC advice on gTLDs
by Cheryl Langdon-Orr Dec. 21, 2011

Dec. 21, 2011

Indeed Adam => the words "We agree with and support the expedient introduction of new gTLDs, especially those offering support for IDNs.... .... ... ." from our Mexico 2009 At-Large Summit Declaration and similar words have integral in ALAC Statements, Notes, Interventions, Reports Comments (to various Calls for Public Comments and in other Fora) over and over again since Interim ALAC days in 2003 => a point perhaps also worth noting by the ALAC Members as they debate this "issue" Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) On 19 December 2011 22:23, Adam Peake <ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp> wrote: > Evan, > > You seem to be of the opinion that the At Large's Mexico statement's > pretty important, the section of the Mexico Declaration addressing > new gTLD opens with the following: > > "We agree with and support the expedient introduction of new gTLDs, > especially those offering support for IDNs. In fact, we believe that > a number of components of the proposed policy present unnecessary > barriers to entry for the broadest possible variety of gTLD > applicants." > > Seems you are coming close to re-writing history. The At Large > statement supported the "broadest possible variety of gTLD > applicants". Your final "whereas" clause not justified. The Mexico > document also refers to "substantial pent-up demand for new gTLDs" > and "We do NOT believe in an interim third round with an arbitrarily > limited number of applications as a "trial run"" (emphasis in the > original). This also seems contrary to your penultimate whereas > clause. > > Many of the issues mentioned in the Mexico declaration have been > addressed, perhaps not to everyone's full satisfaction, but there's > been a lot of work done, very publicly with ALAC's participation (for > example ALAC commented on the GAC scorecard, how did that work out? > GAC got about 80/90%, ALAC?) However, importantly the issue of fees > has not been well addressed. Might also mention a less than perfect > outreach process in this regard (Mike Silber's comments in Dakar > helpful.) > > Perhaps the third whereas about law enforcement could be split off as > a separate statement, the At Large's views more fully explained and > re-submitted as a separate statement? > > Public interest. Please identify the specific public interest issues > that must be addressed. > > When is the ALAC's January call (can't see it on the calender), the > application process opens on January 12th, in 23 days. After all the > opportunities At Large has had to comment I think it would be a grave > mistake to call for suspension of the new gTLD process. > > Thanks, > > Adam > > > > >Hello, > > > >This message is to announce my intention to move this motion at the > >*JANUARY* ALAC meeting. > > > >This is being done in order to enable discussion to take place -- within > >ALAC, its gTLD working group, and the RALOs -- to determine the response > to > >this issue which has been IMO simmering throughout the At-Large community. > > > >We are told by many (and officially by ICANN) that the program is set and > >we should stop complaining, But to refuse to express the point of view of > >the public interest within ICANN -- even if it is contrary to the > >predominant wisdom -- if to fail at the very basics of At-Large's > >bylaw-mandated role. > > > >Please distribute this to the four RALO mailing lists where I do not have > >posting rights, and translate if possible. > > > >- Evan > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >WHEREAS end-users and governments have only been invited to participate in > >the new gTLD program long after its foundation principles were determined; > > > >WHEREAS most of the problems identified by the ALAC in its Mexico City > >Summit declaration related to the new-gTLD program have not been > >satisfactorily addressed and indeed some have worsened; > > > >WHEREAS numerous complaints from governments, intergovernmental > >organizations and other bodies have indicated that law enforcement and > >public-protection measures in the current design of the gTLD program are > >insufficient; > > > >WHEREAS the ICANN Board, without explanation, has refused the > >cross-community endorsement of the Joint Applicant Support Working Group > >recommendations to reduce costs of new gTLD in developing economies > >independent of any fixed fund; > > > >WHEREAS the absence of a staggered release schedule or a fixed timetable > >for future rounds severely inhibits ICANN's ability to correct mistakes in > >the proposed application round; > > > >and > > > >WHEREAS ICANN has still not convincingly demonstrated the end-user need or > >benefit of a simultaneous launch of hundreds of new TLDs; > > > >RESOLVED THAT the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) convey to the ICANN > >Board and community the dissatisfaction of At-Large with the new gTLD > >program in its current form, and explicitly advises that its > implementation > >would be harmful to the public interest. We request that implementation of > >the program be suspended until necessary public-interest modifications are > >implemented. > >_______________________________________________ > >At-Large mailing list > >At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org >

7 11

Draft ALAC Comment on the Issue Report on Thick Whois
by Alan Greenberg Dec. 21, 2011

Dec. 21, 2011

The draft ALAC comment on the Thick Whois Preliminary Issue Report has been posted at https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=30345624. Please make any comments on that Wiki page. Note that this comment must be submitted by 30 December, so the final version must be out and presumably voted on by then. Alan

1 0