January 2015 - At-Large - lists.icann.org

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten Jan. 30, 2015

Jan. 30, 2015

Total of 4 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jan 30 00:53:02 EST 2015 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 50.00% | 2 | 52.16% | 20418 | joly at punkcast.com 25.00% | 1 | 27.53% | 10774 | salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com 25.00% | 1 | 20.31% | 7950 | narten at us.ibm.com --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 4 |100.00% | 39142 | Total

1 0

WEBCAST TUESDAY – State of the Net 2015
by Joly MacFie Jan. 26, 2015

Jan. 26, 2015

At the State of the Net Tuesday again we have a healthy NYC contingent representing. Nancy Scola is moderating a panel on Digital Protectionism <http://stateofthenet2015.sched.org/event/b1c979890977bead1ac4a9c03ff77455>, Rachel Sklar is moderating a panel on Diversity <http://stateofthenet2015.sched.org/event/c7fb2ea7f4ea9d18a5ff3734f0e777be> that includes NYTM's Jessica Lawrence. Nilay Patel is on the Open Internet panel <http://stateofthenet2015.sched.org/event/56b1c4199f03a723e29a4ef289a8b5df> - along with Harold Feld! Nilay has to be an expert on NN since he moderated the Legal Hackers South Street Seaport <https://isoc-ny.org/p2/6844> special last July! And then, also from NYC is me (joly) doing the streaming. Now, as far as the webcast goes. First the $99. SInce we are sponsoring the webcast we have negotiated a reduced rate of $25 for ISOC members. To get the rate all you have to do is email Paul Brigner (currently in Budapest so he will up early on Tuesday morning!) at brigner(a)isoc.org and he will mail you back an individualized discount code. If you are not an ISOC member please join, it's free! While all that is confirmed for the webcast at the moment are the morning plenaries, If you are seriously into Internet policy it has to be worth the 25. In the afternoon there are 3 tracks - see http://stateofthenet2015.sched.org/venues/ - and how and if and which will be streamed is something I'll sort out on the fly. I'd like to do both those rooms on the 8th floor. My feeling is that, if nobody objects and it's technically feasible I might bounce room 807 out to another, possibly free, channel. If so I will announce here. Stay tuned. joly posted: " On Tuesday January 27 2015 the Internet Education Foundation (IEF) will host the 2015 State of the Net Conference at the Newseum in Washington DC. Among the many listed speakers are US CTO Megan Smith, FTC Chair Edith Ramirez, Assistant AG Leslie Caldwe" [image: State of the Net] <http://stateofthenet.cleeng.com/> On *Tuesday January 27 2015* the *Internet Education Foundation <http://neted.org/> *(IEF) will host the *2015 State of the Net Conference* <http://www.stateofthenet.org/> at the *Newseum* in *Washington DC*. Among the many listed speakers are US CTO *Megan Smith*, FTC Chair *Edith Ramirez*, Assistant AG *Leslie Caldwell*, WH Director of Cybersecurity *Ari Schwartz,* Congressman *Bob Goodlatte*, the NTIA's *Larry Strickling*, ICANN's *Theresa Swinehart*, the NCUC's* Milton Mueller*, ISOC's *Sally Wentworth*, CDT's *Nuala O'Connor*, the FCC's *Gigi Sohn*, and her former PK colleague *Harold Feld*. As the 114th Congress kicks off, attendees include some 300 congressional staff and other policymakers. The *Internet Societ <http://internetsociety.org>y* is sponsoring and providing the *live webcast <http://stateofthenet.cleeng.com/>*, which is priced at *$99*. *What: 2015 State of the Net Conference <http://www.stateofthenet.org/> Where: Newseum, Washington DC When: Tuesday January 27 2015 pam-5pm EST | 14:00-22:00 UTC Agenda: http://www.stateofthenet.org/sotn15-agenda/ <http://www.stateofthenet.org/sotn15-agenda/> Speakers: http://stateofthenet2015.sched.org/directory/speakers <http://stateofthenet2015.sched.org/directory/speakers> Webcast: http://stateofthenet.cleeng.com/ <http://stateofthenet.cleeng.com/> ($99) Twitter: #sotn15 <https://twitter.com/search?f=realtime&q=%23sotn15&src=typd>* Comment <http://isoc-ny.org/p2/7410#respond> See all comments <http://isoc-ny.org/p2/7410#comments> *Permalink* http://isoc-ny.org/p2/7410 -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -------------------------------------------------------------- -

1 0

WEBCAST MONDAY: Governments and Internet Governance
by Joly MacFie Jan. 26, 2015

Jan. 26, 2015

Another highly topical discussion from the dynamic DC duo of ISOC DC and the IIEP. With the NMI staggering <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/01/24/hibernating_netmundial_continues_to…> into existence, and now a new kid on the block - the Internet Social Forum <http://justnetcoalition.org/ISF> rattling the cage, and the old stalwart the IGF going intersessional <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/176-igf-2015/preparatory-process/2142-open-c…> - multistakeholder opportunities for governments to engage the Internet community are expanding pell-mell! As the WSIS review <http://www.itu.int/wsis/review/2014.html> looms, there is an urgency to get ducks lined up.. NYC will be well represented at this one. Not only is Veni now based back in town as he tackles the UN, but moderator Nancy Scola is also an emigre from our fair city. Plus I (Joly) will be traveling down myself to run the webcast. joly posted: " Today, Monday 26 January 2015 the Greater Washington DC Chapter of the Internet Society (ISOC-DC) and the Institute of International Economic Policy (IIEP) present Governments and Internet Governance . Despite their long experience in global and domestic" [image: ISOC DC Human Rights in IG] <http://new.livestream.com/internetsociety/20150126InternetGovernance> Today,* Monday 26 January 2015* the *Greater Washington DC Chapter of the Internet Society <http://www.isoc-dc.org/>* (ISOC-DC) and the *Institute of International Economic Policy <http://www.gwu.edu/~iiep/> *(IIEP) present *Governments and Internet Governance <https://www.eventbrite.com/e/governments-and-internet-governance-tickets-15…> *. Despite their long experience in global and domestic governance, policymakers from many nations struggle to find their way in Internet governance. On one hand, only governments can join international organizations such as the UN or WTO. However, the same governments do not have a privileged role in Internet governance institutions such as the Internet Governance Forum (IGF); the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN); or the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), where governments are just one among many actors. Meanwhile, many other stakeholders are increasingly concerned about increased participation by governments in the technical infrastructure and governance bodies that underpin the Internet. This event will examine several different perspectives on participation by governments in Internet governance. Panel: *Amr Aljowaily*, Embassy of Egypt, NYC; Sally Wentworth, Vice President of Global Policy Development, Internet Society; *Veni Markowski*, Bulgaria, VP for UN Engagement, ICANN; *Dr. Marc Daumas*, Scientific Attache, Embassy of France; *Carolina de Cresce El Debs*, Embassy of Brazil; *David Satola*, The World Bank. Moderator: *Nancy Scola*, The Washington Post. The event will be webcast live on the *Internet Society Livestream <http://new.livestream.com/internetsociety/20150126InternetGovernance>* channel. *What: Governments and Internet Governance <https://www.eventbrite.com/e/governments-and-internet-governance-tickets-15…> Where: Institute for International Economic Policy, George Washington University, Washington DC When: Monday 26 January 2015 12:30pm-2pm EST | 17:30-19:00 UTC Webcast: http://new.livestream.com/internetsociety/20150126InternetGovernance <http://new.livestream.com/internetsociety/20150126InternetGovernance> Twitter: @isocdc + #governance <https://twitter.com/search?f=realtime&q=isocdc%20governance&src=typd>* Comment <http://isoc-ny.org/p2/7408#respond> See all comments <http://isoc-ny.org/p2/7408#comments> *Permalink* http://isoc-ny.org/p2/7408 -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -------------------------------------------------------------- -

1 0

Re: [At-Large] [APAC-Discuss] [PICISOC] Invitation to Internet Governance Session #PTC15
by Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro Jan. 23, 2015

Jan. 23, 2015

Dear All, Regrettably the event has passed but certainly other key events to look forward to is the upcoming APRICOT and APrIGF which will be held in Fukuoka, Japan and Macau, China respectively. Sadly there was no recording as you had to be on site but you can follow the #PTC15 or #IGF With every best wish, Sala On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Vish विशारद PYC <virat.surya(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Is it possible to participate via internet? > > On 1/21/15, Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro > <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > Firstly apologies for the cross posting. I would like to invite you to > the > > Pacific Telecommunication Council 15 Conference's Executive Roundtable on > > Internet Governance which is being held in Coral Room 2 at The Hilton, > > Hawaiian Village from 4pm till 5pm Honolulu time. > > > > You can follow the twitter hashtag #PTC15 #IGF > > > > Session Description is as follows: > > > > Executive Insight Roundtable 10: Internet Governance > > In 2005, the UN-sponsored World Summit on the Information Society defined > > Internet governance as "the development and application by governments, > the > > private sector and civil society, in their respective roles, of shared > > principles, norms, rules, decision-making procedures, and programs that > > shape the evolution and use of the Internet." The Internet is expanding > > exponentially. The Internet Governance Forum mandate from the United > nations > > ends in 2015. Though there is no sign that the future of the IGF is in > > danger, so far there is no word from the UN asking for input on the > renewal > > of IGF. In early 2014, the U.S. government announced plans to relinquish > its > > historic stewardship over the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), > > which is operated by ICANN, to the global multi-stakeholder Internet > > community when its contract with ICANN expires in September 2015.Many > > experts believe this change may set the stage for broader changes in > other > > areas of Internet governance, such as intellectual property rights and > > cybersecurity. > > > > Who is responsible for Internet governance among the different > stakeholder > > groups? What are issues that may disrupt the roles of existing > stakeholders? > > How should consensus on key principles or outcomes be reached for > solutions > > that benefit the global Internet rather than special interests? How > should > > market-specific challenges or issues that are particular to a local > > community be approached for the global Internet to continue its > innovative > > contributions? These are just some of the challenging questions around > > Internet Governance that will be discussed in this executive insight > > roundtable. > > > > Moderator: > > Steven Smith, Associate VP, IT Technology & Deputy CIO, University of > > Hawaii, USA > > Panelists: > > David Conrad, CTO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers > > (ICANN) > > John Curran, President and CEO, American Registry for Internet Numbers > > (ARIN) > > Paul Wilson, Director General, Asia Pacific Network Information Centre > > (APNIC) > > With every best wish, > > Sala > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > -- > नमस्ते Namaste > > धन्यवाद Thanks > -- > Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/VisharadManjeet > _______________________________________________ > APAC-Discuss mailing list > APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org

1 0

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten Jan. 23, 2015

Jan. 23, 2015

Total of 14 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jan 23 00:53:03 EST 2015 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 28.57% | 4 | 37.14% | 56728 | jjs at dyalog.net 21.43% | 3 | 22.75% | 34743 | jefsey at jefsey.com 14.29% | 2 | 10.51% | 16050 | salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com 7.14% | 1 | 11.72% | 17899 | mcknight.glenn at gmail.com 7.14% | 1 | 5.16% | 7874 | hilyard at oyster.net.ck 7.14% | 1 | 5.06% | 7731 | alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca 7.14% | 1 | 5.03% | 7687 | narten at us.ibm.com 7.14% | 1 | 2.63% | 4015 | at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 14 |100.00% | 152727 | Total

1 0

Invitation to Internet Governance Session #PTC15
by Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro Jan. 21, 2015

Jan. 21, 2015

Dear All, Firstly apologies for the cross posting. I would like to invite you to the Pacific Telecommunication Council 15 Conference's Executive Roundtable on Internet Governance which is being held in Coral Room 2 at The Hilton, Hawaiian Village from 4pm till 5pm Honolulu time. You can follow the twitter hashtag #PTC15 #IGF Session Description is as follows: Executive Insight Roundtable 10: Internet Governance In 2005, the UN-sponsored World Summit on the Information Society defined Internet governance as "the development and application by governments, the private sector and civil society, in their respective roles, of shared principles, norms, rules, decision-making procedures, and programs that shape the evolution and use of the Internet." The Internet is expanding exponentially. The Internet Governance Forum mandate from the United nations ends in 2015. Though there is no sign that the future of the IGF is in danger, so far there is no word from the UN asking for input on the renewal of IGF. In early 2014, the U.S. government announced plans to relinquish its historic stewardship over the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), which is operated by ICANN, to the global multi-stakeholder Internet community when its contract with ICANN expires in September 2015.Many experts believe this change may set the stage for broader changes in other areas of Internet governance, such as intellectual property rights and cybersecurity. Who is responsible for Internet governance among the different stakeholder groups? What are issues that may disrupt the roles of existing stakeholders? How should consensus on key principles or outcomes be reached for solutions that benefit the global Internet rather than special interests?  How should market-specific challenges or issues that are particular to a local community be approached for the global Internet to continue its innovative contributions? These are just some of the challenging questions around Internet Governance that will be discussed in this executive insight roundtable. Moderator: Steven Smith, Associate VP, IT Technology & Deputy CIO, University of Hawaii, USA Panelists: David Conrad, CTO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) John Curran, President and CEO, American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) Paul Wilson, Director General, Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC) With every best wish, Sala Sent from my iPad

1 0

Re: [At-Large] Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Alan Greenberg Jan. 20, 2015

Jan. 20, 2015

Jean-Jacques, I do not have the time for a detailed reply, but the stats have been generated for many years with the agreement of the ALAC, and no one has ever complained before. If an ALAC member would like to raise the question, we will consider if it should be maintained. Alan At 19/01/2015 06:21 AM, Subrenat, Jean-Jacques wrote: >Thanks Jefsey for your technical observations. > >I read all the messages on this thread (and chuckled on the >sarcastic ones) but none answered my initial questions: > >- Was there a decision to task any particular individual/firm with >carrying out this statistical/nominative >tracking? Was this decision taken in ALAC or elsewhere (date, reference)? > >- Was this submitted to regular review and approval, or is there a >separate decision to grant this as a permanent authorization (date, reference)? > >- If this is being used as a metrics tool, what is its qualitative >relevance? Has it been effectively used to "measure" the value of >this or that member, say in ALAC? How were the criteria determined, >and by whom (date, reference)? > >Remaining silent on these questions would not, in my mind, serve the >"polycratic rights" of the "cyberagora system". You are no doubt >familiar with the novel by Dave Eggers, "The Circle" (Penguin Books, 2013). > >Jean-Jacques.

2 1

Re: [At-Large] Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Subrenat, Jean-Jacques Jan. 19, 2015

Jan. 19, 2015

Hello Jefsey, my questions are those of a former member of the ICANN Board, a former member of the ALAC, and someone who considers that Internet processes should place far more emphasis on the Internet user (rights, default settings for privacy, etc). Metrics? I was simply quoting some colleagues who suggested that these statistics were useful in evaluating the presence and/or contribution of members. So far, nobody has offered a documented example of these statistics having any qualitative value. Jean-Jacques. ----- Mail original ----- De: "JFC Morfin" <jefsey(a)jefsey.com> À: "Jean-Jacques Subrenat" <jjs(a)dyalog.net>, "Jefsey" <jefsey(a)jefsey.com> Cc: "At-Large Worldwide" <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Envoyé: Lundi 19 Janvier 2015 15:30:07 Objet: Re: [At-Large] Weekly posting summary for at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org At 12:21 19/01/2015, Subrenat, Jean-Jacques wrote: >Thanks Jefsey for your technical observations. >I read all the messages on this thread (and >chuckled on the sarcastic ones) but none answered my initial questions: Dear Jean-Jacques, JE SUIS JEFSEY your questions are highly politcally incorrect and only reflect the ICANN totalitary spirit! They reflect the idea that an ALAC member can be sensored on this list. And that to send a mail on the list one must first obtain an approval >- Was there a decision to task any particular >individual/firm with carrying out this statistical/nominative >tracking? Was this decision taken in ALAC or elsewhere (date, reference)? obtained through a democratic process or .... "elsewhere". >- Was this submitted to regular review and >approval, or is there a separate decision to >grant this as a permanent authorization (date, reference)? after being reviewed and approved - except in the case of a pre-1789 special priviledge. >- If this is being used as a metrics tool, what >is its qualitative relevance? Has it been >effectively used to "measure" the value of this >or that member, say in ALAC? How were the >criteria determined, and by whom (date, reference)? I am afraid you do not evaluate the Narten Express correctly . This is not a metric ***tool***: you do not have a received a script to do it by yourself with your own secret parameters. This a ***service*** provided by Thomas permitting you to have your own metric tool without an effort. Thomas has chosen - his liberty - to tell us his weekly opinion on the list through this service. He could have chosen to send us a long mail with his comments. >Remaining silent on these questions would not, >in my mind, serve the "polycratic rights" of the "cyberagora system". The catenet's cyberagora system by the internet technology is low grade for a simple reason : it lacks myriads of self operated services like Thomas' one. Some to bring others information, others to remove oneself from that services' lists. However, the problem is not with Thomas, it is with the ICANN centralization culture, which depends on, but also calls for the IETF centralization in spite of the Subsitiarity Principle and RFC 6852 on innovation by competition. > You are no doubt familiar with the novel by > Dave Eggers, "The Circle" (Penguin Books, 2013).' I never was able to determine if this was about a Google or an ICANN clone. I will support you worry about Thomas the day you campaign against whois! Take care! jfc >Jean-Jacques. > > > > > >----- Mail original ----- >De: "Jefsey" <jefsey(a)jefsey.com> >Ã€: "Jean-Jacques Subrenat" <jjs(a)dyalog.net> >Cc: "At-Large Worldwide" <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >EnvoyÃ©: Lundi 19 Janvier 2015 11:19:48 >Objet: Re: [At-Large] Weekly posting summary >for at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >Jean-Jacques, > >I am afraid this list of points denotes an interventionist attitude >which is out of context with our multitude's polycratic rights. It is >interesting to note that it surprisingly comes as an opposition - >between two former ICANN Board Members - from a French ambassador to >a glasnost service by an American industry member. > >However, it calls for an extended understanding of the internet >cyberagora system I plead for that should be discussed either on the >IETF or on the Libre's technical WG lists. Addressing the request >refers to the uses of classes of senders and groups of receivers (or >closed user groups, or more generally VGNs [virtual glocal networks]) >within a distribution list. Something I advocate for a long as an >SMTP/DNS/CATENET/etc/ generalization of what is already >non-interoperationnally disseminated in the technology. In this case >it could probably be patched in using the keyword field? > >jfc > >At 23:16 02/01/2015, Subrenat, Jean-Jacques wrote: > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64Dear Colleagues, > > > >my request is to be unsubscribed ONLY from the "Weekly posting > >summary" established by T. Narten, not from other elements on the > >At-Large lists (this is in answer to Seun's remark). My request is > >based on the following considerations: > > > >1) This "summary" was considered by some in the ALAC as a metric of > >effective presence and work of its members (Carlton's remark). I > >have long questioned the validity of this approach, and still do. > >This measurement not have its equivalent, say on the ICANN Board, > >where the "360Â° Review" of Directors is carried out with other tools. > > > >2) This form of statistical data has no qualitative value, as it may > >record a peak of correspondence from one ALAC or At-Large member > >giving family news and being congratulated by everyone else, or any > >other topic, for that matter. > > > >3) Nominative tracking also raises the question of how such > >information may or may not be used for purposes it was or was not > >designed for, e.g. surveillance. > > > >4) A minor point, but non-US citizens may have noticed that the > >"summary" is provided by, and emanates from, an address in a US > >corporation. In itself this is not a cause for concern, but some > >questions need to be answered: was there a decision to ask/grant any > >particular individual/firm to carry out this statistical/nominative > >tracking (date, reference), was this submitted to regular review and > >approval, is there a separate decision to grant this as a permanent > >authorization? > > > >5) It is not desirable, nor fair, that members of the At-Large > >and/or ALAC lists cannot ask to be unsubscribed from one item (in > >this case the "Weekly posting summary") without being deleted from > >these lists for other items and debates. > > > >6) It goes without saying, but I wish to make clear here, that my > >lack of enthusiasm for this "Weekly posting summary" is in no way a > >judgment on the value of its author, whom I worked with as a member > >of the ICANN Board, and whose experience and opinion I value. > > > >Jean-Jacques. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Mail original ----- > >De: "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> > >Ã€: "Thomas Narten" <narten(a)us.ibm.com> > >Cc: "Jean-Jacques Subrenat" <jjs(a)dyalog.net>, "At-Large Worldwide" > ><at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > >EnvoyÃ©: Vendredi 2 Janvier 2015 22:13:40 > >Objet: Re: [At-Large] Weekly posting summary for > >at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > > > > >Dear Colleagues: > > > > > >I beg to disagree these postings are not desirable and I will tell you why. > > > > > >The ALAC has developed performance/engagement/utility metrics that, > >for better or worse, include elements that are displayed by this report. > > > > > >Consider then this report an artful early warning device. I should > >think such a one is both good and necessary for ALAC members; > >shooting the messenger, or, 'disappearing' the message would hardly > >be curative. > > > > > >I'm of a mind that only when the ALAC metrics are disavowed, then > >and only then one could reasonably insist this notification is unnecessary. > > > > > >-Carlton > > > > > >-Carlton > > > > > > > > > >============================== > >Carlton A Samuels > >Mobile: 876-818-1799 > >Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround > >============================= > > > >On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Thomas Narten < narten(a)us.ibm.com > wrote: > > > > > > > this is to request that I be unsubscribed from this "At-Large weekly > > > posting summary", which I find not useful. > > > >Sorry, individual folk can't opt out of this message, as it's sent to > >the list. Everyone on the list gets it, as they do all postings. > > > >If it's the collective sense of this list that these postings are no > >longer needed or desired, I will stop generating them. > > > >Thomas > > > > > > > > > Jean-Jacques. > >‚ €( >( > >KKKKHXZ[ÃœšYÃš[€al ----- > > > > De: "Thomas Narten" < narten(a)us.ibm.com > > > > Ã€: at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >[ï¿½â€ºÃžpÃªNˆ™[™™Y@ 2 Ja@ 2 Janvier 2015 06:53:04 > >Ã˜š™]ˆÃ�]S\™Ã™WHÃ™YZÃ›HÃZÃ›HÃœÃ�ing summary > for at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >‚FÃ°tal of 5 messages in the last 7 days. > > > > > > > script run at: Fri Jan 2 00:53:04 EST 2015 > > > > > > Messages | Bytes | Who > > > --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ > > > 20.00% | 1 | 25.50% | 11120 | sylvia at internautabrasil.org > >ŒŒ HHNKï¿½ŒIH > > >MLYZ[ˆ]ttcsweb.org > > > 20.00% | 1 | 18.97% | 8273 | narten at us.ibm.com > > > 20.00% | 1 | 17.98% | 7839 | louis.houle at oricom.ca > > > 20.00% | 1 | 17.93% | 7819 | b.schombe at gmail.com > > > --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ > >LŒ H > >HLŒ H > >Ã�ŒHÃ�[ï¿½ˆ€> __________________________________________________ > > > At-Large mailing list > > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >‚BÃ”Ã†&vRÃ¶ffÂ6ÂÃ‚6—FSÂ¢âÂ¢â€¡GGÂ¢Ã²Ã¶FÃ†&vRÃ¦Â6Ã¦Ã¢Ã¦Ã·&r > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >At-Large mailing list > >At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > > > >_______________________________________________ > >At-Large mailing list > >At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

2 2

[ccnso-council] Invitation to ccNSO Newcomer Webinar
by Maureen Hilyard Jan. 19, 2015

Jan. 19, 2015

From: owner-ccnso-council(a)icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Kristina Nordstrom Sent: Monday, 19 January 2015 3:56 a.m. Subject: [ccnso-council] Invitation to ccNSO Newcomer Webinar Dear all, You are all invited to participate in a ccNSO Newcomer Webinar prior to the Singapore meeting, to be held on the 27 of January on two occasions: 08:00 UTC and 20:00 UTC. If you wish to participate, just join the session most convenient for your timezone. The webinar is meant to introduce newcomers to the ccNSO and ICANN world, but is open to anyone interested in the function of the ccNSO and its role within ICANN. We will also touch on ccNSO activities at ICANN meetings. Please feel free to forward this information to anyone who might find it useful. You do not need to rsvp, just show up! Adigo numbers: http://adigo.com/icann/ Conference ID: 5258 Adobe Room: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/ccnso2015 <https://icann.adobeconnect.com/ccnso2015/> If you need a dial out for either of the sessions please let me know as soon as possible. Two-way audio will be available in the Adobe room. Kind regards, Kristina

1 0

Re: [At-Large] Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by JFC Morfin Jan. 19, 2015

Jan. 19, 2015

At 12:21 19/01/2015, Subrenat, Jean-Jacques wrote: >Thanks Jefsey for your technical observations. >I read all the messages on this thread (and >chuckled on the sarcastic ones) but none answered my initial questions: Dear Jean-Jacques, JE SUIS JEFSEY your questions are highly politcally incorrect and only reflect the ICANN totalitary spirit! They reflect the idea that an ALAC member can be sensored on this list. And that to send a mail on the list one must first obtain an approval >- Was there a decision to task any particular >individual/firm with carrying out this statistical/nominative >tracking? Was this decision taken in ALAC or elsewhere (date, reference)? obtained through a democratic process or .... "elsewhere". >- Was this submitted to regular review and >approval, or is there a separate decision to >grant this as a permanent authorization (date, reference)? after being reviewed and approved - except in the case of a pre-1789 special priviledge. >- If this is being used as a metrics tool, what >is its qualitative relevance? Has it been >effectively used to "measure" the value of this >or that member, say in ALAC? How were the >criteria determined, and by whom (date, reference)? I am afraid you do not evaluate the Narten Express correctly . This is not a metric ***tool***: you do not have a received a script to do it by yourself with your own secret parameters. This a ***service*** provided by Thomas permitting you to have your own metric tool without an effort. Thomas has chosen - his liberty - to tell us his weekly opinion on the list through this service. He could have chosen to send us a long mail with his comments. >Remaining silent on these questions would not, >in my mind, serve the "polycratic rights" of the "cyberagora system". The catenet's cyberagora system by the internet technology is low grade for a simple reason : it lacks myriads of self operated services like Thomas' one. Some to bring others information, others to remove oneself from that services' lists. However, the problem is not with Thomas, it is with the ICANN centralization culture, which depends on, but also calls for the IETF centralization in spite of the Subsitiarity Principle and RFC 6852 on innovation by competition. > You are no doubt familiar with the novel by > Dave Eggers, "The Circle" (Penguin Books, 2013).' I never was able to determine if this was about a Google or an ICANN clone. I will support you worry about Thomas the day you campaign against whois! Take care! jfc >Jean-Jacques. > > > > > >----- Mail original ----- >De: "Jefsey" <jefsey(a)jefsey.com> >Ã: "Jean-Jacques Subrenat" <jjs(a)dyalog.net> >Cc: "At-Large Worldwide" <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >EnvoyÃ©: Lundi 19 Janvier 2015 11:19:48 >Objet: Re: [At-Large] Weekly posting summary >for at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >Jean-Jacques, > >I am afraid this list of points denotes an interventionist attitude >which is out of context with our multitude's polycratic rights. It is >interesting to note that it surprisingly comes as an opposition - >between two former ICANN Board Members - from a French ambassador to >a glasnost service by an American industry member. > >However, it calls for an extended understanding of the internet >cyberagora system I plead for that should be discussed either on the >IETF or on the Libre's technical WG lists. Addressing the request >refers to the uses of classes of senders and groups of receivers (or >closed user groups, or more generally VGNs [virtual glocal networks]) >within a distribution list. Something I advocate for a long as an >SMTP/DNS/CATENET/etc/ generalization of what is already >non-interoperationnally disseminated in the technology. In this case >it could probably be patched in using the keyword field? > >jfc > >At 23:16 02/01/2015, Subrenat, Jean-Jacques wrote: > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64Dear Colleagues, > > > >my request is to be unsubscribed ONLY from the "Weekly posting > >summary" established by T. Narten, not from other elements on the > >At-Large lists (this is in answer to Seun's remark). My request is > >based on the following considerations: > > > >1) This "summary" was considered by some in the ALAC as a metric of > >effective presence and work of its members (Carlton's remark). I > >have long questioned the validity of this approach, and still do. > >This measurement not have its equivalent, say on the ICANN Board, > >where the "360Â° Review" of Directors is carried out with other tools. > > > >2) This form of statistical data has no qualitative value, as it may > >record a peak of correspondence from one ALAC or At-Large member > >giving family news and being congratulated by everyone else, or any > >other topic, for that matter. > > > >3) Nominative tracking also raises the question of how such > >information may or may not be used for purposes it was or was not > >designed for, e.g. surveillance. > > > >4) A minor point, but non-US citizens may have noticed that the > >"summary" is provided by, and emanates from, an address in a US > >corporation. In itself this is not a cause for concern, but some > >questions need to be answered: was there a decision to ask/grant any > >particular individual/firm to carry out this statistical/nominative > >tracking (date, reference), was this submitted to regular review and > >approval, is there a separate decision to grant this as a permanent > >authorization? > > > >5) It is not desirable, nor fair, that members of the At-Large > >and/or ALAC lists cannot ask to be unsubscribed from one item (in > >this case the "Weekly posting summary") without being deleted from > >these lists for other items and debates. > > > >6) It goes without saying, but I wish to make clear here, that my > >lack of enthusiasm for this "Weekly posting summary" is in no way a > >judgment on the value of its author, whom I worked with as a member > >of the ICANN Board, and whose experience and opinion I value. > > > >Jean-Jacques. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Mail original ----- > >De: "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> > >Ã: "Thomas Narten" <narten(a)us.ibm.com> > >Cc: "Jean-Jacques Subrenat" <jjs(a)dyalog.net>, "At-Large Worldwide" > ><at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > >EnvoyÃ©: Vendredi 2 Janvier 2015 22:13:40 > >Objet: Re: [At-Large] Weekly posting summary for > >at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > > > > >Dear Colleagues: > > > > > >I beg to disagree these postings are not desirable and I will tell you why. > > > > > >The ALAC has developed performance/engagement/utility metrics that, > >for better or worse, include elements that are displayed by this report. > > > > > >Consider then this report an artful early warning device. I should > >think such a one is both good and necessary for ALAC members; > >shooting the messenger, or, 'disappearing' the message would hardly > >be curative. > > > > > >I'm of a mind that only when the ALAC metrics are disavowed, then > >and only then one could reasonably insist this notification is unnecessary. > > > > > >-Carlton > > > > > >-Carlton > > > > > > > > > >============================== > >Carlton A Samuels > >Mobile: 876-818-1799 > >Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround > >============================= > > > >On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Thomas Narten < narten(a)us.ibm.com > wrote: > > > > > > > this is to request that I be unsubscribed from this "At-Large weekly > > > posting summary", which I find not useful. > > > >Sorry, individual folk can't opt out of this message, as it's sent to > >the list. Everyone on the list gets it, as they do all postings. > > > >If it's the collective sense of this list that these postings are no > >longer needed or desired, I will stop generating them. > > > >Thomas > > > > > > > > > Jean-Jacques. > > ( >( > >KKKKHXZ[ÃYÃ[al ----- > > > > De: "Thomas Narten" < narten(a)us.ibm.com > > > > Ã: at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >[ï¿½âºÃpÃªN[Y@ 2 Ja@ 2 Janvier 2015 06:53:04 > >Ã]Ã]S\ÃWHÃYZÃHÃZÃHÃÃing summary > for at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >FÃ°tal of 5 messages in the last 7 days. > > > > > > > script run at: Fri Jan 2 00:53:04 EST 2015 > > > > > > Messages | Bytes | Who > > > --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ > > > 20.00% | 1 | 25.50% | 11120 | sylvia at internautabrasil.org > > HHNKï¿½IH > > >MLYZ[]ttcsweb.org > > > 20.00% | 1 | 18.97% | 8273 | narten at us.ibm.com > > > 20.00% | 1 | 17.98% | 7839 | louis.houle at oricom.ca > > > 20.00% | 1 | 17.93% | 7819 | b.schombe at gmail.com > > > --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ > >L H > >HL H > >ÃHÃ[ï¿½> __________________________________________________ > > > At-Large mailing list > > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >BÃÃ&vRÃ¶ffÂ6ÂÃ6FSÂ¢âÂ¢â¡GGÂ¢Ã²Ã¶FÃ&vRÃ¦Â6Ã¦Ã¢Ã¦Ã·&r > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >At-Large mailing list > >At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > > > >_______________________________________________ > >At-Large mailing list > >At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

1 0

Re: [At-Large] Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Subrenat, Jean-Jacques Jan. 19, 2015

Jan. 19, 2015

Thanks Jefsey for your technical observations. I read all the messages on this thread (and chuckled on the sarcastic ones) but none answered my initial questions: - Was there a decision to task any particular individual/firm with carrying out this statistical/nominative tracking? Was this decision taken in ALAC or elsewhere (date, reference)? - Was this submitted to regular review and approval, or is there a separate decision to grant this as a permanent authorization (date, reference)? - If this is being used as a metrics tool, what is its qualitative relevance? Has it been effectively used to "measure" the value of this or that member, say in ALAC? How were the criteria determined, and by whom (date, reference)? Remaining silent on these questions would not, in my mind, serve the "polycratic rights" of the "cyberagora system". You are no doubt familiar with the novel by Dave Eggers, "The Circle" (Penguin Books, 2013). Jean-Jacques. ----- Mail original ----- De: "Jefsey" <jefsey(a)jefsey.com> À: "Jean-Jacques Subrenat" <jjs(a)dyalog.net> Cc: "At-Large Worldwide" <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Envoyé: Lundi 19 Janvier 2015 11:19:48 Objet: Re: [At-Large] Weekly posting summary for at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Jean-Jacques, I am afraid this list of points denotes an interventionist attitude which is out of context with our multitude's polycratic rights. It is interesting to note that it surprisingly comes as an opposition - between two former ICANN Board Members - from a French ambassador to a glasnost service by an American industry member. However, it calls for an extended understanding of the internet cyberagora system I plead for that should be discussed either on the IETF or on the Libre's technical WG lists. Addressing the request refers to the uses of classes of senders and groups of receivers (or closed user groups, or more generally VGNs [virtual glocal networks]) within a distribution list. Something I advocate for a long as an SMTP/DNS/CATENET/etc/ generalization of what is already non-interoperationnally disseminated in the technology. In this case it could probably be patched in using the keyword field? jfc At 23:16 02/01/2015, Subrenat, Jean-Jacques wrote: >Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64Dear Colleagues, > >my request is to be unsubscribed ONLY from the "Weekly posting >summary" established by T. Narten, not from other elements on the >At-Large lists (this is in answer to Seun's remark). My request is >based on the following considerations: > >1) This "summary" was considered by some in the ALAC as a metric of >effective presence and work of its members (Carlton's remark). I >have long questioned the validity of this approach, and still do. >This measurement not have its equivalent, say on the ICANN Board, >where the "360° Review" of Directors is carried out with other tools. > >2) This form of statistical data has no qualitative value, as it may >record a peak of correspondence from one ALAC or At-Large member >giving family news and being congratulated by everyone else, or any >other topic, for that matter. > >3) Nominative tracking also raises the question of how such >information may or may not be used for purposes it was or was not >designed for, e.g. surveillance. > >4) A minor point, but non-US citizens may have noticed that the >"summary" is provided by, and emanates from, an address in a US >corporation. In itself this is not a cause for concern, but some >questions need to be answered: was there a decision to ask/grant any >particular individual/firm to carry out this statistical/nominative >tracking (date, reference), was this submitted to regular review and >approval, is there a separate decision to grant this as a permanent >authorization? > >5) It is not desirable, nor fair, that members of the At-Large >and/or ALAC lists cannot ask to be unsubscribed from one item (in >this case the "Weekly posting summary") without being deleted from >these lists for other items and debates. > >6) It goes without saying, but I wish to make clear here, that my >lack of enthusiasm for this "Weekly posting summary" is in no way a >judgment on the value of its author, whom I worked with as a member >of the ICANN Board, and whose experience and opinion I value. > >Jean-Jacques. > > > > > > > >----- Mail original ----- >De: "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> >À: "Thomas Narten" <narten(a)us.ibm.com> >Cc: "Jean-Jacques Subrenat" <jjs(a)dyalog.net>, "At-Large Worldwide" ><at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >Envoyé: Vendredi 2 Janvier 2015 22:13:40 >Objet: Re: [At-Large] Weekly posting summary for >at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > >Dear Colleagues: > > >I beg to disagree these postings are not desirable and I will tell you why. > > >The ALAC has developed performance/engagement/utility metrics that, >for better or worse, include elements that are displayed by this report. > > >Consider then this report an artful early warning device. I should >think such a one is both good and necessary for ALAC members; >shooting the messenger, or, 'disappearing' the message would hardly >be curative. > > >I'm of a mind that only when the ALAC metrics are disavowed, then >and only then one could reasonably insist this notification is unnecessary. > > >-Carlton > > >-Carlton > > > > >============================== >Carlton A Samuels >Mobile: 876-818-1799 >Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround >============================= > >On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Thomas Narten < narten(a)us.ibm.com > wrote: > > > > this is to request that I be unsubscribed from this "At-Large weekly > > posting summary", which I find not useful. > >Sorry, individual folk can't opt out of this message, as it's sent to >the list. Everyone on the list gets it, as they do all postings. > >If it's the collective sense of this list that these postings are no >longer needed or desired, I will stop generating them. > >Thomas > > > > > Jean-Jacques. >‚ €( >KKKKHXZ[ÜšYÚ[€al ----- > > De: "Thomas Narten" < narten(a)us.ibm.com > > > À: at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >[�›ÞpêNˆ™[™™Y@ 2 Janvier 2015 06:53:04 >Øš™]ˆÐ]S\™ÙWHÙYZÛHÜÝing summary for at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >‚Fðtal of 5 messages in the last 7 days. > > > > script run at: Fri Jan 2 00:53:04 EST 2015 > > > > Messages | Bytes | Who > > --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ > > 20.00% | 1 | 25.50% | 11120 | sylvia at internautabrasil.org >ŒŒ HHNK�ŒIH >MLYZ[ˆ]ttcsweb.org > > 20.00% | 1 | 18.97% | 8273 | narten at us.ibm.com > > 20.00% | 1 | 17.98% | 7839 | louis.houle at oricom.ca > > 20.00% | 1 | 17.93% | 7819 | b.schombe at gmail.com > > --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ >LŒ H >HLŒ H >ÍŒHÝ[�ˆ€> _______________________________________________ > > At-Large mailing list > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >‚BÔÆ&vRöff6Â6—FS¢‡GG¢òöFÆ&vRæ6æâæ÷&r > > >_______________________________________________ >At-Large mailing list >At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > >_______________________________________________ >At-Large mailing list >At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

1 0

IANA Transition Demystified #PTC15
by Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro Jan. 19, 2015

Jan. 19, 2015

Dear All, I would like to invite you to attend the session on IANA Demystified if you are in Honolulu for the PTC 15. Details are as follows: http://www.ptc.org/ptc15/program-and-attendees/complete-program/details.htm… We have ICANN CTO, APNIC DG on the Panel amongst others, details are in the link above. Kind Regards, Sala Sent from my iPad

2 1

Re: [At-Large] Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Jefsey Jan. 19, 2015

Jan. 19, 2015

Jean-Jacques, I am afraid this list of points denotes an interventionist attitude which is out of context with our multitude's polycratic rights. It is interesting to note that it surprisingly comes as an opposition - between two former ICANN Board Members - from a French ambassador to a glasnost service by an American industry member. However, it calls for an extended understanding of the internet cyberagora system I plead for that should be discussed either on the IETF or on the Libre's technical WG lists. Addressing the request refers to the uses of classes of senders and groups of receivers (or closed user groups, or more generally VGNs [virtual glocal networks]) within a distribution list. Something I advocate for a long as an SMTP/DNS/CATENET/etc/ generalization of what is already non-interoperationnally disseminated in the technology. In this case it could probably be patched in using the keyword field? jfc At 23:16 02/01/2015, Subrenat, Jean-Jacques wrote: >Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64Dear Colleagues, > >my request is to be unsubscribed ONLY from the "Weekly posting >summary" established by T. Narten, not from other elements on the >At-Large lists (this is in answer to Seun's remark). My request is >based on the following considerations: > >1) This "summary" was considered by some in the ALAC as a metric of >effective presence and work of its members (Carlton's remark). I >have long questioned the validity of this approach, and still do. >This measurement not have its equivalent, say on the ICANN Board, >where the "360° Review" of Directors is carried out with other tools. > >2) This form of statistical data has no qualitative value, as it may >record a peak of correspondence from one ALAC or At-Large member >giving family news and being congratulated by everyone else, or any >other topic, for that matter. > >3) Nominative tracking also raises the question of how such >information may or may not be used for purposes it was or was not >designed for, e.g. surveillance. > >4) A minor point, but non-US citizens may have noticed that the >"summary" is provided by, and emanates from, an address in a US >corporation. In itself this is not a cause for concern, but some >questions need to be answered: was there a decision to ask/grant any >particular individual/firm to carry out this statistical/nominative >tracking (date, reference), was this submitted to regular review and >approval, is there a separate decision to grant this as a permanent >authorization? > >5) It is not desirable, nor fair, that members of the At-Large >and/or ALAC lists cannot ask to be unsubscribed from one item (in >this case the "Weekly posting summary") without being deleted from >these lists for other items and debates. > >6) It goes without saying, but I wish to make clear here, that my >lack of enthusiasm for this "Weekly posting summary" is in no way a >judgment on the value of its author, whom I worked with as a member >of the ICANN Board, and whose experience and opinion I value. > >Jean-Jacques. > > > > > > > >----- Mail original ----- >De: "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> >À: "Thomas Narten" <narten(a)us.ibm.com> >Cc: "Jean-Jacques Subrenat" <jjs(a)dyalog.net>, "At-Large Worldwide" ><at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >Envoyé: Vendredi 2 Janvier 2015 22:13:40 >Objet: Re: [At-Large] Weekly posting summary for >at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > >Dear Colleagues: > > >I beg to disagree these postings are not desirable and I will tell you why. > > >The ALAC has developed performance/engagement/utility metrics that, >for better or worse, include elements that are displayed by this report. > > >Consider then this report an artful early warning device. I should >think such a one is both good and necessary for ALAC members; >shooting the messenger, or, 'disappearing' the message would hardly >be curative. > > >I'm of a mind that only when the ALAC metrics are disavowed, then >and only then one could reasonably insist this notification is unnecessary. > > >-Carlton > > >-Carlton > > > > >============================== >Carlton A Samuels >Mobile: 876-818-1799 >Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround >============================= > >On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Thomas Narten < narten(a)us.ibm.com > wrote: > > > > this is to request that I be unsubscribed from this "At-Large weekly > > posting summary", which I find not useful. > >Sorry, individual folk can't opt out of this message, as it's sent to >the list. Everyone on the list gets it, as they do all postings. > >If it's the collective sense of this list that these postings are no >longer needed or desired, I will stop generating them. > >Thomas > > > > > Jean-Jacques. > ( >KKKKHXZ[ÜYÚ[al ----- > > De: "Thomas Narten" < narten(a)us.ibm.com > > > À: at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >[ÞpêN[Y@ 2 Janvier 2015 06:53:04 >Ø]Ð]S\ÙWHÙYZÛHÜÝing summary for at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >Fðtal of 5 messages in the last 7 days. > > > > script run at: Fri Jan 2 00:53:04 EST 2015 > > > > Messages | Bytes | Who > > --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ > > 20.00% | 1 | 25.50% | 11120 | sylvia at internautabrasil.org > HHNKIH >MLYZ[]ttcsweb.org > > 20.00% | 1 | 18.97% | 8273 | narten at us.ibm.com > > 20.00% | 1 | 17.98% | 7839 | louis.houle at oricom.ca > > 20.00% | 1 | 17.93% | 7819 | b.schombe at gmail.com > > --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ >L H >HL H >ÍHÝ[> _______________________________________________ > > At-Large mailing list > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >BÔÆ&vRöff6Â6FS¢GG¢òöFÆ&vRæ6æâæ÷&r > > >_______________________________________________ >At-Large mailing list >At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > >_______________________________________________ >At-Large mailing list >At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

1 0

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten Jan. 16, 2015

Jan. 16, 2015

Total of 3 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jan 16 00:53:02 EST 2015 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 33.33% | 1 | 36.84% | 9599 | joly at punkcast.com 33.33% | 1 | 31.60% | 8233 | fatimacambronero at gmail.com 33.33% | 1 | 31.56% | 8224 | narten at us.ibm.com --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 3 |100.00% | 26056 | Total

1 0

REMOTE PARTICIPATION: NCUC Meeting with DC Internet Governance people 1500 UTC today
by Joly MacFie Jan. 14, 2015

Jan. 14, 2015

ISOC-NY is a member of the NonCommercial Users Constituency, and our mebers are encouraged to involve themselves in it's policy discussions. Here is a good opportunity. Attending in person will be some of our DC Chapter colleagues plus Jane Coffin from ISOC staff. joly posted: "Today Wednesday 14 January 2015, ancillary to the intersessional meeting of the Non-Contracted Parties House (NCPH) of the Generic Names Standing Organization (GNSO) at ICANN, the NonCommercial Users Constituency (NCUC) will hold an outreach meeting with " [image: NCUC] <http://ncuc.org>Today *Wednesday 14 January 2015*, ancillary to the intersessional meeting <https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Intersessional+-+January+2015> of the Non-Contracted Parties House (NCPH) of the Generic Names Standing Organization (GNSO) at ICANN, the ** *NonCommercial Users Constituency* (NCUC) will hold *an outreach meeting <http://www.ncuc.org/ncuc-civil-society-outreach-event-in-washington-dc-janu…>* with Internet Governance interested people at the Center for Democracy and Technnology (CDT)in Washington DC. On the agenda, the IANA transition, accountability mechanisms in the context of globalization, human rights in internet governance, privacy and registry services, access to knowledge and intellectual property, freedom of expression and development, and ICANN in broader Internet governance, including NETmundial Initiative and the Internet Governance Forum. The meeting is by invitation only, but *remote participation* is possible via webex or phone bridge. *What: NCUC Civil Society Outreach Event <http://www.ncuc.org/ncuc-civil-society-outreach-event-in-washington-dc-janu…> Where: CDT, Washington DC When: Wednesday 14 January 2015 10am-Noon EST | 1500-1700 UTC Webex: https://cdtmeetings.webex.com/cdtmeetings/j.php?MTID=m0abd02e67615e37bc2c94… <https://cdtmeetings.webex.com/cdtmeetings/j.php?MTID=m0abd02e67615e37bc2c94…> Phone bridge: http://www.ncuc.org/ncuc-civil-society-outreach-event-in-washington-dc-janu… <http://www.ncuc.org/ncuc-civil-society-outreach-event-in-washington-dc-janu…> Twitter: @NCUC <https://twitter.com/search?f=realtime&q=%40NCUC&src=typd> * *Agenda:* 1. Participant Introductions 2. Brief introduction of NCUC @ ICANN 3. 2-3 minute introductions of issues NCUC works on in ICANN, e.g. • IANA and the transitioning of US authority (Matt Shears) • Accountability mechanisms in the context of globalization (Matt Shears) • Human rights generally (Bill Drake) • Privacy and registry services (Stephanie Perrin) • Access to knowledge and intellectual property (Kathy Kleiman) • Freedom of expression (David Cake) • Development (Rafik Dammak) • ICANN in broader Internet governance, e.g. NETmundial Initiative, IGF (Bill Drake) 4. Inputs from local participants on how these and related issues are being addressed in Washington DC and beyond 5. Open integrative discussion Comment <http://isoc-ny.org/p2/7375#respond> See all comments <http://isoc-ny.org/p2/7375#comments> *Permalink* : http://isoc-ny.org/p2/7375 --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org ---------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Fwd: ICANN News Alert -- Webinar: Interactive Presentation of the Initial Report of the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group
by Fatima Cambronero Jan. 9, 2015

Jan. 9, 2015

*(sorry for crossposting)* FYI, ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: ICANN News Alert <communications(a)icann.org> Date: 2015-01-09 15:46 GMT-03:00 Subject: ICANN News Alert -- Webinar: Interactive Presentation of the Initial Report of the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group To: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com The PDP Working Group on Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information has been chartered to determine whether contact information data should be translated or transliterated into a common language and/or script. The Group has published its Initial Report recommending not to make translation/transliteration of contact information mandatory but to allow for it on a voluntary basis. The public comment <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/transliteration-contact-initial-2014-…> period on this Report is open until 1 February 2015. To help the Community understand the Working Group's reasoning and to facilitate the submission of public comments, the Working Group co-Chairs will hold a 30-min webinar on Friday 16 January at 14:00 UTC. The aim is to present the preliminary recommendations and allow for an extended question and answer session, providing an opportunity for an interactive exchange between the Community and members of this PDPWorking Group. Webinar on 17 January 2015; 14.00-14.30 UTC To take part please RSVP via gnso-secs(a)icann.org This message was sent to fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com from: ICANN News Alert | communications(a)icann.org | ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Email Marketing by [image: iContact - Try It Free!] <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186> Manage Your Subscription <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=13227880&l=6333&s=RZZO&m=95…> -- *Fatima Cambronero* Abogada-Argentina Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero

1 0

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten Jan. 9, 2015

Jan. 9, 2015

Total of 17 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jan 9 00:53:02 EST 2015 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 17.65% | 3 | 19.15% | 31766 | seun.ojedeji at gmail.com 11.76% | 2 | 14.95% | 24791 | apisan at unam.mx 11.76% | 2 | 10.10% | 16754 | narten at us.ibm.com 5.88% | 1 | 7.82% | 12969 | roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com 5.88% | 1 | 7.18% | 11906 | louis.houle at oricom.ca 5.88% | 1 | 5.91% | 9801 | amedinagomez at gmail.com 5.88% | 1 | 5.85% | 9706 | devtee at gmail.com 5.88% | 1 | 5.71% | 9467 | wolf.ludwig at comunica-ch.net 5.88% | 1 | 5.06% | 8396 | toml at communisphere.com 5.88% | 1 | 4.80% | 7960 | garth.graham at telus.net 5.88% | 1 | 4.79% | 7945 | evan at telly.org 5.88% | 1 | 4.76% | 7901 | ocl at gih.com 5.88% | 1 | 3.91% | 6480 | vanda at uol.com.br --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 17 |100.00% | 165842 | Total

1 0

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten Jan. 7, 2015

Jan. 7, 2015

Total of 5 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Jan 2 00:53:04 EST 2015 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 20.00% | 1 | 25.50% | 11120 | sylvia at internautabrasil.org 20.00% | 1 | 19.61% | 8550 | admin at ttcsweb.org 20.00% | 1 | 18.97% | 8273 | narten at us.ibm.com 20.00% | 1 | 17.98% | 7839 | louis.houle at oricom.ca 20.00% | 1 | 17.93% | 7819 | b.schombe at gmail.com --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 5 |100.00% | 43601 | Total

18 23

welcome to LACRALO Ricardo!!!
by Vanda Scartezini Jan. 6, 2015

Jan. 6, 2015

I am sure ISOC Venezuela will bring great value to our community! All the best Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos.

1 0

Re: [At-Large] Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Seun Ojedeji Jan. 2, 2015

Jan. 2, 2015

Just noticed I did not copy my response below to the list. Regards sent from Google nexus 4 kindly excuse brevity and typos. On 2 Jan 2015 14:34, "Seun Ojedeji" <seun.ojedeji(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi JJ, > > An individual can't be excluded from just this mail, it is either its > stopped totally or you filter it out from your end. Nevertheless I also > think weekly report is too heavy, admin may consider a monthly report (so > it comes same day with the monthly password reminder). > > Regards > > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Subrenat, Jean-Jacques <jjs(a)dyalog.net> > wrote: > >> Hello, >> this is to request that I be unsubscribed from this "At-Large weekly >> posting summary", which I find not useful. >> Thank you. >> Jean-Jacques. >> >> >> >> >> ----- Mail original ----- >> De: "Thomas Narten" <narten(a)us.ibm.com> >> À: at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> Envoyé: Vendredi 2 Janvier 2015 06:53:04 >> Objet: [At-Large] Weekly posting summary for >> at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> >> Total of 5 messages in the last 7 days. >> >> script run at: Fri Jan 2 00:53:04 EST 2015 >> >> Messages | Bytes | Who >> --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ >> 20.00% | 1 | 25.50% | 11120 | sylvia at internautabrasil.org >> 20.00% | 1 | 19.61% | 8550 | admin at ttcsweb.org >> 20.00% | 1 | 18.97% | 8273 | narten at us.ibm.com >> 20.00% | 1 | 17.98% | 7839 | louis.houle at oricom.ca >> 20.00% | 1 | 17.93% | 7819 | b.schombe at gmail.com >> --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ >> 100.00% | 5 |100.00% | 43601 | Total >> >> _______________________________________________ >> At-Large mailing list >> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >> >> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org >> _______________________________________________ >> At-Large mailing list >> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >> >> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org >> > > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: > http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt > email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji(a)fuoye.edu.ng > <seun.ojedeji(a)fuoye.edu.ng>* > > The key to understanding is humility - my view ! > > >

1 0

Re: [At-Large] Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Raf Fatani Jan. 2, 2015

Jan. 2, 2015

Likewise please. > On 2 Jan 2015, at 19:17, Seth M Reiss <seth.reiss(a)lex-ip.com> wrote: > > Me also! > > -----Original Message----- > From: at-large-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Subrenat, Jean-Jacques > Sent: Friday, January 02, 2015 1:01 AM > To: Thomas Narten > Cc: at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: Re: [At-Large] Weekly posting summary for at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Hello, > this is to request that I be unsubscribed from this "At-Large weekly posting summary", which I find not useful. > Thank you. > Jean-Jacques. > > > > > ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Thomas Narten" <narten(a)us.ibm.com> > À: at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Envoyé: Vendredi 2 Janvier 2015 06:53:04 > Objet: [At-Large] Weekly posting summary for at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Total of 5 messages in the last 7 days. > > script run at: Fri Jan 2 00:53:04 EST 2015 > > Messages | Bytes | Who > --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ > 20.00% | 1 | 25.50% | 11120 | sylvia at internautabrasil.org > 20.00% | 1 | 19.61% | 8550 | admin at ttcsweb.org > 20.00% | 1 | 18.97% | 8273 | narten at us.ibm.com > 20.00% | 1 | 17.98% | 7839 | louis.houle at oricom.ca > 20.00% | 1 | 17.93% | 7819 | b.schombe at gmail.com > --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ > 100.00% | 5 |100.00% | 43601 | Total > > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2015.0.5577 / Virus Database: 4257/8853 - Release Date: 01/02/15 > > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

1 0