- At-Large - lists.icann.org

Re: [At-Large] [NA-Discuss] Civic Representation in ICANN: WhatNow? - ISOC-NY Forum @ NYU 10/8/09
by Beau Brendler Oct. 5, 2009

Oct. 5, 2009

Yes, I meant the current re-organization scheme. No intent on my part to try to take credit for others' work -- and, in fact, I am very glad you told me this idea has been around since 2001. -----Original Message----- >From: Joly MacFie <joly(a)punkcast.com> >Sent: Oct 5, 2009 6:29 AM >To: Chris McElroy 786-317-8774 <namecritic(a)blogs.pn> >Cc: At-Large Worldwide <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>, NA Discuss <na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >Subject: Re: [At-Large] [NA-Discuss] Civic Representation in ICANN: WhatNow? - ISOC-NY Forum @ NYU 10/8/09 > >Well, I can't speak for Beau, but I would imagine what he meant is >that this was the intitial proposal under the current re-organization >scheme. > >Joly > > > >On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Chris McElroy 786-317-8774 ><namecritic(a)blogs.pn> wrote: >> Uh, Beau, you wrote; "It was not necessarily a recent proposal to establish >> a consumer constituency -- I wrote the initial proposal back in February, I >> think." >> >> It's been proposed since 2001. So, no it isn't necessarily a recent >> proposal, nor did you originally write one. Originally, it was proposed by >> several people over the years. >> >> Chris McElroy >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Beau Brendler" >> <beaubrendler(a)earthlink.net> >> To: "Joly MacFie" <joly(a)punkcast.com>; "At-Large Worldwide" >> <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>; "NA Discuss" >> <na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >> Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 8:55 AM >> Subject: Re: [At-Large] [NA-Discuss] Civic Representation in ICANN: WhatNow? >> - ISOC-NY Forum @ NYU 10/8/09 >> >> >>> A couple of minor corrections: >>> >>> The biographical stuff is accurate but incomplete, in that I left >>> Consumers Union at the end of May, after eight years, and am now at NARSAD, >>> the National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression. I am no >>> longer with a consumer organization, though I do continue in consumer >>> journalism, writing a column for AOL's Money and Finance section >>> (http://www.walletpop.com/blog/bloggers/beau-brendler/) It was not >>> necessarily a recent proposal to establish a consumer constituency -- I >>> wrote the initial proposal back in February, I think. It's since been >>> heavily rewritten and re-submitted to recast some presuppositions and >>> correct some inaccuracies. >>> >>> As for this paragraph: >>> However some members – of both the NCUC and At-Large – with particular >>>> >>>> axes to grind, are keen on a plan that will permit them to represent >>>> their interests in the GNSO without having to carry the NCUC with >>>> them. >>> >>> I'm not entirely sure what that means. But the proposal for the consumer >>> constituency grew out of issues related to ALAC, which, at the time, was not >>> really set up to accomodate the interests of consumer groups. >>> >>> And those three seats are no longer placeholders, the board has chosen >>> candidates for them. >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>>> >>>> From: Joly MacFie <joly(a)punkcast.com> >>>> Sent: Oct 2, 2009 10:41 PM >>>> To: At-Large Worldwide <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>, NA Discuss >>>> <na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >>>> Subject: [NA-Discuss] Civic Representation in ICANN: What Now? - ISOC-NY >>>> Forum @ NYU 10/8/09 >>>> >>>> *** Please feel free to email me off list with any egregious mistakes >>>> in my description below. Joly(a)punkcast.com *** >>>> >>>> >>>> Civic Representation in ICANN: What Now? >>>> >>>> What: An ISOC-NY Forum >>>> When: Thurs Oct 8 2009 – 6:45pm – 8:45pm >>>> Where: Warren Weaver Hall NYU >>>> 251 Mercer St Rm 317 >>>> New York NY 10012 >>>> http://cs.nyu.edu/web/Location/directions.html >>>> Who: Dr Milton Mueller; Beau Brendler; Danny Younger >>>> >>>> Admission free: RSVP president(a)isoc-ny.org >>>> >>>> On Oct 1 2009 the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers >>>> (ICANN) entered a new era as its Joint Project Agreement (JPA) with >>>> the US Government expired and it became a truly independent global >>>> organization. In this forum we will examine the processes, currently >>>> in flux, of how we the people will get to participate in this new >>>> paradigm. >>>> >>>> The newly coined Articles of Commitment (AoC) state that ICANN will >>>> “operate as a multi-stakeholder, private sector led organization with >>>> input from the public, for whose benefit ICANN shall in all events >>>> act.” >>>> >>>> Currently there are two mechanisms by which the Internet using public >>>> are represented at ICANN. The Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC >>>> aka NonComm) in the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) and >>>> the At-Large organization.. >>>> >>>> The At-Large Advisory Council was formed, with official liaison >>>> status, as an interim measure in 2003 after the ICANN board had >>>> dispensed with direct public elections. In 2007 with the establishment >>>> of regional At-Large Organizations (ALO’s). the ALAC became permanent. >>>> ALO membership is open to all individuals and organizations can apply >>>> to become an At-Large Structure (ALS). In 2009 it was agreed that an >>>> ICANN board seat be allotted to the At-Large. >>>> >>>> The GNSO Council is ICANN’s primary body responsible for policy >>>> recommendations for generic top level domains. The board balances the >>>> GNSO recommendations with input from the Government Advisory Committee >>>> (GAC) and liaisons from various technical groups, plus At Large (soon >>>> to be seated, as mentioned) plus the ICANN Ombudsman. >>>> >>>> Other constituencies in are, Business/Commercial, Registries, ISPs, >>>> and Intellectual Property. The NCUC, formerly the Noncommercial Domain >>>> Holders Constituency, has thus been, since ICANN’s inception, the sole >>>> voice of non-commercial users on the GNSO Council. As such it has >>>> taken to representing regular internet users’ concerns as well as >>>> those of registrants. >>>> >>>> Earlier this year ICANN proposed another re-organization, replacing >>>> the GNSO constituencies with two ‘houses’ – Contracted and >>>> Non-contracted, each of which was further divided into two stakeholder >>>> groups. Contracted has Registries and Registrars; Non-Contracted has >>>> Commercial (CSG) and Noncommercial (NCSG). 12 seats on the GNSO >>>> Council would be split thus: CSG 6; NCSG 6; Registries 3; Registrars >>>> 3. >>>> >>>> The former ISP, Business, and IP constituencies are to be folded into >>>> the CSG and presumably take two seats each. >>>> >>>> On the NCSG front: 3 seats have been alloted to the NCUC and 3 >>>> placeholders have been selected by the ICANN Structural Improvement >>>> Committee. >>>> >>>> The NCUC has argued against the plan insisting that it will only serve >>>> to further balkanize the GNSO process, and that practical policymaking >>>> would be better served by ad-hoc working groups than the proposed >>>> legislative approach. >>>> >>>> http://gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/en/improvements/executive-summary-ncsg-pro… >>>> >>>> However some members – of both the NCUC and At-Large – with particular >>>> axes to grind, are keen on a plan that will permit them to represent >>>> their interests in the GNSO without having to carry the NCUC with >>>> them. >>>> >>>> The three speakers we are bringing together on Oct 8 represent widely >>>> differing views on how it is best to proceed in the public interest. >>>> It is sure to be a very lively and interesting discussion. >>>> >>>> We will webcast and there will be an opportunity for remote >>>> participation via a chatroom. >>>> >>>> More info: http://isoc-ny.org/?p=886 >>>> >>>> Speakers: >>>> >>>> Dr. Milton Mueller >>>> >>>> Milton Mueller is a Professor and Director of the Telecommunications >>>> Network Management Program at the Syracuse University School of >>>> Information Studies. He is the author of ‘Ruling the Root: Internet >>>> Governance and the Taming of Cyberspace’ (MIT Press, 2002) – the >>>> definitive account of early Internet governance debates. Mueller was a >>>> co-founder of the Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC) and was >>>> chair of NCUC from 2003-2005. >>>> >>>> http://www.internetgovernance.org/people-mueller.html >>>> >>>> Beau Brendler: >>>> >>>> Beau Brendler is a journalist and consumer activist who takes a >>>> particular interest in Internet affairs. He was a founder and >>>> editorial director of ABCNews.com before moving to a fulltime position >>>> at the Consumers Union in 2001 where he launched Consumer WebWatch . >>>> He is an active member of the ICANN Community and serves on the >>>> At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) . He has recently proposed the >>>> establishment of a Consumer Constituency within the Generic Names >>>> Supporting Organization (GNSO). >>>> >>>> Danny Younger: >>>> >>>> Danny Younger has been involved with ICANN since at least 2001 >>>> including active participation on the General Assembly mailing list. >>>> He represented ISOC-NY in the Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC) >>>> from 2004-2007. He has for some time advocated for a single >>>> Registrants constituency within the GNSO. >>>> >>>> More info: >>>> ICANN Structure: http://www.icann.org/en/structure/ >>>> NonCommercial Users Constituency: http://www.ncdnhc.org/ >>>> At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.icann.org/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Joly MacFie 917 442 8665 Skype:punkcast >>>> WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com >>>> http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> ------ >>>> NA-Discuss mailing list >>>> NA-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>> >>>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ic… >>>> >>>> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org >>>> ------ >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> At-Large mailing list >>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> >>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.ican… >>> >>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org >> >> > > > >-- >--------------------------------------------------------------- >Joly MacFie 917 442 8665 Skype:punkcast >WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com >http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com >--------------------------------------------------------------- > >_______________________________________________ >At-Large mailing list >At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.ican… > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

1 0

Re: [At-Large] [NA-Discuss] Civic Representation in ICANN: What Now? - ISOC-NY Forum @ NYU 10/8/09
by Beau Brendler Oct. 5, 2009

Oct. 5, 2009

A couple of minor corrections: The biographical stuff is accurate but incomplete, in that I left Consumers Union at the end of May, after eight years, and am now at NARSAD, the National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression. I am no longer with a consumer organization, though I do continue in consumer journalism, writing a column for AOL's Money and Finance section (http://www.walletpop.com/blog/bloggers/beau-brendler/) It was not necessarily a recent proposal to establish a consumer constituency -- I wrote the initial proposal back in February, I think. It's since been heavily rewritten and re-submitted to recast some presuppositions and correct some inaccuracies. As for this paragraph: However some members – of both the NCUC and At-Large – with particular >axes to grind, are keen on a plan that will permit them to represent >their interests in the GNSO without having to carry the NCUC with >them. I'm not entirely sure what that means. But the proposal for the consumer constituency grew out of issues related to ALAC, which, at the time, was not really set up to accomodate the interests of consumer groups. And those three seats are no longer placeholders, the board has chosen candidates for them. -----Original Message----- >From: Joly MacFie <joly(a)punkcast.com> >Sent: Oct 2, 2009 10:41 PM >To: At-Large Worldwide <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>, NA Discuss <na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >Subject: [NA-Discuss] Civic Representation in ICANN: What Now? - ISOC-NY Forum @ NYU 10/8/09 > >*** Please feel free to email me off list with any egregious mistakes >in my description below. Joly(a)punkcast.com *** > > >Civic Representation in ICANN: What Now? > >What: An ISOC-NY Forum >When: Thurs Oct 8 2009 – 6:45pm – 8:45pm >Where: Warren Weaver Hall NYU >251 Mercer St Rm 317 >New York NY 10012 >http://cs.nyu.edu/web/Location/directions.html >Who: Dr Milton Mueller; Beau Brendler; Danny Younger > >Admission free: RSVP president(a)isoc-ny.org > >On Oct 1 2009 the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers >(ICANN) entered a new era as its Joint Project Agreement (JPA) with >the US Government expired and it became a truly independent global >organization. In this forum we will examine the processes, currently >in flux, of how we the people will get to participate in this new >paradigm. > >The newly coined Articles of Commitment (AoC) state that ICANN will >“operate as a multi-stakeholder, private sector led organization with >input from the public, for whose benefit ICANN shall in all events >act.” > >Currently there are two mechanisms by which the Internet using public >are represented at ICANN. The Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC >aka NonComm) in the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) and >the At-Large organization.. > >The At-Large Advisory Council was formed, with official liaison >status, as an interim measure in 2003 after the ICANN board had >dispensed with direct public elections. In 2007 with the establishment >of regional At-Large Organizations (ALO’s). the ALAC became permanent. >ALO membership is open to all individuals and organizations can apply >to become an At-Large Structure (ALS). In 2009 it was agreed that an >ICANN board seat be allotted to the At-Large. > >The GNSO Council is ICANN’s primary body responsible for policy >recommendations for generic top level domains. The board balances the >GNSO recommendations with input from the Government Advisory Committee >(GAC) and liaisons from various technical groups, plus At Large (soon >to be seated, as mentioned) plus the ICANN Ombudsman. > >Other constituencies in are, Business/Commercial, Registries, ISPs, >and Intellectual Property. The NCUC, formerly the Noncommercial Domain >Holders Constituency, has thus been, since ICANN’s inception, the sole >voice of non-commercial users on the GNSO Council. As such it has >taken to representing regular internet users’ concerns as well as >those of registrants. > >Earlier this year ICANN proposed another re-organization, replacing >the GNSO constituencies with two ‘houses’ – Contracted and >Non-contracted, each of which was further divided into two stakeholder >groups. Contracted has Registries and Registrars; Non-Contracted has >Commercial (CSG) and Noncommercial (NCSG). 12 seats on the GNSO >Council would be split thus: CSG 6; NCSG 6; Registries 3; Registrars >3. > >The former ISP, Business, and IP constituencies are to be folded into >the CSG and presumably take two seats each. > >On the NCSG front: 3 seats have been alloted to the NCUC and 3 >placeholders have been selected by the ICANN Structural Improvement >Committee. > >The NCUC has argued against the plan insisting that it will only serve >to further balkanize the GNSO process, and that practical policymaking >would be better served by ad-hoc working groups than the proposed >legislative approach. >http://gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/en/improvements/executive-summary-ncsg-pro… > >However some members – of both the NCUC and At-Large – with particular >axes to grind, are keen on a plan that will permit them to represent >their interests in the GNSO without having to carry the NCUC with >them. > >The three speakers we are bringing together on Oct 8 represent widely >differing views on how it is best to proceed in the public interest. >It is sure to be a very lively and interesting discussion. > >We will webcast and there will be an opportunity for remote >participation via a chatroom. > >More info: http://isoc-ny.org/?p=886 > >Speakers: > >Dr. Milton Mueller > >Milton Mueller is a Professor and Director of the Telecommunications >Network Management Program at the Syracuse University School of >Information Studies. He is the author of ‘Ruling the Root: Internet >Governance and the Taming of Cyberspace’ (MIT Press, 2002) – the >definitive account of early Internet governance debates. Mueller was a >co-founder of the Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC) and was >chair of NCUC from 2003-2005. > >http://www.internetgovernance.org/people-mueller.html > >Beau Brendler: > >Beau Brendler is a journalist and consumer activist who takes a >particular interest in Internet affairs. He was a founder and >editorial director of ABCNews.com before moving to a fulltime position >at the Consumers Union in 2001 where he launched Consumer WebWatch . >He is an active member of the ICANN Community and serves on the >At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) . He has recently proposed the >establishment of a Consumer Constituency within the Generic Names >Supporting Organization (GNSO). > >Danny Younger: > >Danny Younger has been involved with ICANN since at least 2001 >including active participation on the General Assembly mailing list. >He represented ISOC-NY in the Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC) >from 2004-2007. He has for some time advocated for a single >Registrants constituency within the GNSO. > >More info: >ICANN Structure: http://www.icann.org/en/structure/ >NonCommercial Users Constituency: http://www.ncdnhc.org/ >At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.icann.org/ > > > >-- >--------------------------------------------------------------- >Joly MacFie 917 442 8665 Skype:punkcast >WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com >http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com >--------------------------------------------------------------- > >------ >NA-Discuss mailing list >NA-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ic… > >Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org >------

3 3

Re: [At-Large] Registrar behaviour
by Franck Martin Oct. 5, 2009

Oct. 5, 2009

Yeah right, Like they would volunteer such information.... beside it does not allow to conduct regular checks... and it does not stop the application , it may make it only a bit more difficult. A copy of the criminal file from the place of residence, that's what's needed. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger(a)yahoo.com> To: "At-Large Worldwide" <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Cc: "Franck Martin" <franck.martin(a)gmail.com> Sent: Monday, 5 October, 2009 2:15:24 PM GMT +12:00 Fiji Subject: Re: [At-Large] Registrar behaviour Re: Now if in the registrar agreement they were a clause that say tat all the directors should submit a police report (regularly), and that no director should have a criminal conviction, that would be something. Registrar Accreditation: Application 12. Indicate whether (i) the applicant or any of its (ii) officers, (iii) directors, or (iv) managers: a. within the past ten years, has been convicted of a felony or of a misdemeanor related to financial activities, or has been judged by a court to have committed fraud or breach of fiduciary duty, or has been the subject of a judicial determination that is similar or related to any of these; b. within the past ten years, has been disciplined by the government of its, her, or his domicile for conduct involving dishonesty or misuse of funds of others; c. is currently involved in any judicial or regulatory proceeding that could result in a conviction, judgment, determination, or discipline of the type specified in (a) or (b); or d. is the subject of a disqualification imposed by ICANN and in effect at the time of this application. If any of the above events have occurred, please provide details. http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/accreditation-application.htm

1 0

Re: [At-Large] Topical detour. Was: Re: Registrar behaviour
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 4, 2009

Oct. 4, 2009

At 04/10/2009 03:22 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote: > Karl Auerbach wrote: > > > > This stuff can get complicated. > > > >And it may get more complicated. > >It would not surprise me at all if one of the acts of the new post-JPA ICANN >is to move its incorporation outside of the US, to an environment less >litigation happy and more in line with the its status as an international >co-ordination body. Except that Affirmation 8 reads "ICANN affirms its commitments to: ... (b) remain a not for profit corporation, headquartered in the United States of America ..." Alan

2 2

Re: [At-Large] Registrar behaviour
by Franck Martin Oct. 4, 2009

Oct. 4, 2009

What you explain to me is that one of the director has been convicted before, if he/she has done the time, in the local justice system, then I don't think it is the role of ICANN to supplant the local justice system. The way I read 5.3.2, is that ICANN reserve the right to terminate the contract if the registrar is convicted of financial fraud, but likely ICANN will not do anything because the local court will have already decided what to do with the convicted and unlikely there will be something like forbidding to do business.... Now if in the registrar agreement they were a clause that say tat all the directors should submit a police report (regularly), and that no director should have a criminal conviction, that would be something. I agree with you there is no public benefit in enabling criminals to become registrars, but that's more like moral or ethics, and that's usually different from laws, which seems to explain to me why ICANN is not doing anything. We need tougher restrictions in the contracts. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John R. Levine" <johnl(a)iecc.com> To: "At-Large Worldwide" <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Sent: Monday, 5 October, 2009 1:22:51 AM GMT +12:00 Fiji Subject: Re: [At-Large] Registrar behaviour > ICANN is not the International justice system, or then there is clearly mission creep... > > Does the registrar follow the contract and ICANN rules? Please read section 5.3.2 of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement, and then tell us whether I'm asking about mission creep, or about ICANN enforcing its own rules. It might also be useful to remember that ICANN is incorporated as a tax-exempt charity (something that will not change under the new agreement), which means it is supposed to work for the public benefit. What is the public benefit in enabling criminals to be registrars? R's, John

1 0

Questions regarding New Board Director position
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 4, 2009

Oct. 4, 2009

Wolf posted some questions regarding the proposed At-large Director, and I have given my view on them - https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?ideas_for_consideration. I have no doubt that others may have somewhat different views. Alan

2 1

Report on Domain Names Registered Using a Privacy or Proxy Service
by Patrick Vande Walle Oct. 4, 2009

Oct. 4, 2009

ICANN has just published a report on the above-mentioned subject. It is at http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-3-01oct09-en.htm It reports statistical data only. I personally consider it misses the point. Rough figures are meaningless if they are not used in context. There was no evaluation of use of proxy services by spammers, scammers and other cybercriminals. Neither was there any measurement of the use of privacy services by individuals trying to protect against the previously mentioned criminals. /. also has a topic on the subject: http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/10/03/2218220/ICANN-Studies-Secretive-Doma… The comments to the Slashdot article are especially interesting. -- Patrick Vande Walle Blog: http://patrick.vande-walle.eu Twitter: http://twitter.vande-walle.eu facebook: http://facebook.vande-walle.eu

1 0

Fwd: Board appointments to fill 3 non-commercial seats on the new Council
by Denise Michel Oct. 2, 2009

Oct. 2, 2009

Dear Community Members, The Board has appointed the following individuals to serve as Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG) representatives on the new GNSO Council: Mohammed Rafik Dammak – Tunisia Rosemary Sinclair – Australia Debra Hughes – United States Under the terms of the NCSG transitional charter approved by the Board on 30 July 2009, three of the six NCSG representatives on the new GNSO Council to be seated at the Seoul meeting were to be selected/appointed by the Board. The Board's Structural Improvements Committee (SIC) considered applications from a talented and diverse group of volunteers, conducted extensive due diligence, carefully reviewed the candidates, and recommended for full Board consideration a slate of three nominees to serve on the GNSO Council for the next two years. The individuals listed above were recommended by the SIC for Board appointment based on their combination of skills, experience, background, geographic location, knowledge and passion, with particular attention to their ability to help build non-commercial participation and contribute to the work of the GNSO. More (official) information can be found in the Board resolution that will be posted here <http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/>shortly. Staff will be following-up with these individuals to make the necessary arrangements for their participation. Regards, Denise Denise Michel ICANN Vice President Policy Development policy-staff(a)icann.org

12 18

Weekly posting summary for alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten Oct. 2, 2009

Oct. 2, 2009

Total of 111 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Oct 2 00:53:08 EDT 2009 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 9.01% | 10 | 8.02% | 71166 | evan at telly.org 6.31% | 7 | 9.44% | 83752 | roberto at icann.org 7.21% | 8 | 7.55% | 67025 | andrespiazzagpj at hotmail.com 7.21% | 8 | 6.05% | 53657 | patrick at vande-walle.eu 5.41% | 6 | 6.29% | 55856 | baptista at publicroot.org 6.31% | 7 | 4.10% | 36347 | alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca 4.50% | 5 | 4.76% | 42261 | khaled.koubaa at topnet.tn 4.50% | 5 | 4.45% | 39470 | jam at jacquelinemorris.com 4.50% | 5 | 4.36% | 38712 | dannyyounger at yahoo.com 3.60% | 4 | 3.89% | 34486 | jefsey at jefsey.com 2.70% | 3 | 3.78% | 33575 | beaubrendler at earthlink.net 3.60% | 4 | 2.71% | 24065 | sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr 2.70% | 3 | 2.85% | 25245 | nick.ashton-hart at icann.org 2.70% | 3 | 2.47% | 21877 | cheryl at hovtek.com.au 1.80% | 2 | 2.92% | 25910 | william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch 1.80% | 2 | 2.39% | 21238 | ymshana2003 at hotmail.com 1.80% | 2 | 2.30% | 20427 | parminder at itforchange.net 1.80% | 2 | 1.65% | 14601 | ocl at gih.com 1.80% | 2 | 1.61% | 14297 | bfausett at internet.law.pro 1.80% | 2 | 1.42% | 12596 | staff at atlarge.icann.org 1.80% | 2 | 1.28% | 11396 | presidencia at internauta.org.ar 1.80% | 2 | 1.09% | 9647 | johnl at iecc.com 0.90% | 1 | 1.71% | 15157 | info at internautabrasil.org 0.90% | 1 | 1.41% | 12548 | hongxueipr at gmail.com 0.90% | 1 | 1.19% | 10584 | langdonorr at gmail.com 0.90% | 1 | 1.07% | 9458 | elisabeth.porteneuve at cetp.ipsl.fr 0.90% | 1 | 0.85% | 7572 | franck.martin at gmail.com 0.90% | 1 | 0.81% | 7208 | dmiloshevic at afilias.info 0.90% | 1 | 0.80% | 7105 | carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com 0.90% | 1 | 0.78% | 6908 | ajp at glocom.ac.jp 0.90% | 1 | 0.77% | 6856 | carlton.samuels at uwimona.edu.jm 0.90% | 1 | 0.75% | 6613 | avc at namesatwork.com 0.90% | 1 | 0.74% | 6562 | dthompson at gov.nu.ca 0.90% | 1 | 0.73% | 6472 | denise.michel at icann.org 0.90% | 1 | 0.70% | 6253 | narten at us.ibm.com 0.90% | 1 | 0.64% | 5644 | karl at cavebear.com 0.90% | 1 | 0.62% | 5489 | rudi.vansnick at isoc.be 0.90% | 1 | 0.55% | 4910 | jmamodio at gmail.com 0.90% | 1 | 0.49% | 4367 | omar at kaminski.adv.br --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 111 |100.00% | 887312 | Total

1 0

Re: [At-Large] Board appointments to fill 3 non-commercial seats on the new Council
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 1, 2009

Oct. 1, 2009

I will start of by saying that I do not know any of the new appointees nor was I a participant in the candidate evaluation process, and this comment is not supporting or objecting to the appointees. I believe that people have multiple interests, and that when being evaluated for an appointment such as this, it is the overall person that should be evaluated. In my mind, their employer or even their occupation should be the sole determination. Roberto said that Debra "is not in the Council as an individual, but as a representative of her organization". This is a new rule that I have never heard about before. If a person is elected/appointed by a group to represent them, such as a GNSO Councillor representing the RyR, it would be reasonable for the RyR to recall that person if they quit their job at a registry and went to work for a registrar. But for those appointed by the NomCom or by the Board for the old Interim ALAC, I have never heard mention of a rule that says you need to be recalled or resign if you change your job. Certainly a person could choose to resign as a matter of conscience, but I do not recall it mentioned anywhere that "thou shall not change employers". In theory, I would think it is fair game for a person to accept such as appointment based on their employment status, with the caveat that if that changes, they would resign. But I have never heard of such a rule within ICANN. Alan

1 0