- At-Large - lists.icann.org

Finnaly!: ICANN Directs Registrars to Take Steps to Authenticate WHOIS Data
by Jeffrey A. Williams May 31, 2008

May 31, 2008

All, Some very good news from ICANN finnaly! This is what myself, Danny Younger and others have been urging ICANN to do for several years now on various forums, especially the RAA and ALAC. It is a bit sad that it has taken ICANN several years to finnaly see the light. But at least they have in this regard at last. Now we shall see if they follow through... See: http://www.gcn.com/online/vol1_no1/46351-1.html?topic=security&CMP=OTC-RSS http://www.metimes.com/Security/2008/05/29/analysis_crackdown_on_domain_nam… Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

1 0

Fast Flux Briefing Session
by Matthias Langenegger May 30, 2008

May 30, 2008

Veuillez trouver la version française du message suivant plus bas Por favor véase el mensaje en español abajo Dear all, We have been asked to host a Teleconference briefing session on Fast Flux Hosting and Dave Piscitello from ICANN's Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) agreed to give a presentation on the subject. The session will be recorded and there will be simultaneous interpretation in French and Spanish. We plan to have a series of briefing sessions on current ICANN issues that will then be posted on our website for training purposes. What is Fast Flux hosting ? "Fast flux" is an evasion technique that cyber-criminals and Internet miscreants use to evade identification and to frustrate law enforcement and anticrime efforts aimed at locating and shutting down web sites used for illegal purposes. Fast flux hosting supports a wide variety of cyber-crime activities (fraud, identity theft, online scams) and is considered one of the most serious threats to online activities today. One variant of fast flux hosting, "double flux", exploits the domain name registration and name resolution services. For further reading on the issue, please consider the following publications. They will shortly be available in Spanish and French. * SSAC Advisory on Fast Flux Hosting and DNS ( http://www.icann.org/committees/security/sac025.pdf * GNSO Issues Report on Fast Flux Hosting ( http://gnso.icann.org/issues/fast-flux-hosting/gnso-issues-report-fast-flux…) * PDP approval motion of the GNSO (see Motion 20080508-3 under http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/) Those of you interested in this presentation, please use the below link to a meeting planer with a couple of proposed slots in early June. Please indicate all slots that would work for you. We will then send you an invitation with participation information. http://www.doodle.ch/kbqbwvxca9ay2g5y Regards, At-Large Staff Cher(e)s membres, Nous avons été invité d'héberger, par le biais d'une téléconférence, une session d'information sur "l'Accueil Rapide de Flux" (ou "Fast Flux Hosting"). Monsieur Dave Piscitello de la division Sécurité et Stabilité du Comité Consultatif (SSAC) d'ICANN a accepté de présenter un exposé sur le sujet. La session sera enregistrée et il y aura une interprétation simultanée en français et en espagnol. Nous prévoyons également d'avoir une série de sessions d'information sur les questions actuelles d'ICANN qui seront ensuite placées sur notre site Web en tant qu'outils de formation. Qu'est-ce que l'Accueil Rapide de Flux? "L'Accueil Rapide de Flux" est une technique d'évasion que les cyber-criminels et les mécréants d'Internet emploient pour esquiver l'identification et pour frustrer le renforcement des lois et les efforts anticriminelles afin de non seulement localiser, mais aussi d'arrêter les sites Internet utilisés à des buts illégaux. L'Accueil Rapide de Flux soutient une large variété d'activités cyber-criminelle (fraude, vol d'identité, escroqueries en ligne) et est considéré comme une des plus graves menaces des activités en ligne d'aujourd'hui. Une variante de l'Accueil Rapide de Flux, les "doubles flux" exploite l'enregistrement des Noms de Domaine et des Services de Résolution des Noms. Pour davantage de lecture sur ces questions, veuillez s'il vous plait examiner les publications suivantes. Elles seront sous peu disponibles en espagnol et en français. * SSAC Advisory on Fast Flux Hosting and DNS ( http://www.icann.org/committees/security/sac025.pdf ) * GNSO Issues Report on Fast Flux Hosting ( http://gnso.icann.org/issues/fast-flux-hosting/gnso-issues-report-fast-flux… ) * PDP approval motion of the GNSO (voir Motion 20080508-3 sous http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/ ) Ceux d'entre vous intéressé par cette présentation, veuillez s'il vous plait utiliser le lien ci-dessous qui vous dirigera vers quelques choix proposées pour la semaine du 2 Juin. Veuillez s'il vous plait selectionner tous les dates que vous seront possible. Nous vous enverrons par la suite une invitation électronique. http://www.doodle.ch/kbqbwvxca9ay2g5y Cordialement, At-Large Staff Estimados miembros de At-Large, Dave Piscitello del comité de asesores de seguridad y estabilidad de ICANN (Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC)) ha declarado estar dispuesto a hacer una presentación sobre el Fast Flux Hosting. Lo interpretará simultaneamente en lengua española y francesa así como una grabación de audio. Planeamos tener una serie de presentaciones sobre temas actuales de Internet que luego estarán disponibles en un archivo de formación online. Que es el Fast Flux Hosting? El Fast Flux es un método de evasión usada por criminales de Internet para evadir su identificación y así frustrar la lucha anticriminal de los autoridades que intentan localizar y cerrar los sitios Webs usados para fines ilegales. El Fast Flux Hosting es usado en varias actividades del ciber-crimen organizado tales como el fraude, el robo o suplantación de identidad y el engaño on-line y representa hoy en día una de las más serias amenazas para la actividad on-line de hoy. Otra variante del Fast Flux Hosting es el Double Flux, un método que se aprovecha de los servicios de registro de dominios. Para obtener más información sobre este tema, las siguientes publicaciones pueden ser útiles. Serán traducidas en español y francés en breve. * SSAC Advisory on Fast Flux Hosting and DNS ( http://www.icann.org/committees/security/sac025.pdf * GNSO Issues Report on Fast Flux Hosting ( http://gnso.icann.org/issues/fast-flux-hosting/gnso-issues-report-fast-flux…) * PDP approval motion of the GNSO (véase Motion 20080508-3 en http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/) Si le interesa esta presentación, siga por favor el vínculo abajo para que sepamos los datos que más le convengan. Le ofrecemos opciones para la semana del 2 de Junio. Por favor, seleccione todas las opciones que le convengan. Le enviaremos una invitación con toda la información para participar después. http://www.doodle.ch/kbqbwvxca9ay2g5y Saludos, Nick Ashton-Hart, Matthias Langenegger, Frederic Teboul ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org

2 1

Re: [At-Large] ISOC-NY 'Connecting .nyc' forum - video
by WWWhatsup May 30, 2008

May 30, 2008

At 10:17 2008-05-30, you wrote: >WWWhatsup wrote: >> Video of Tom Lowenhaupt's presentation last week about the plan to acquire >> the .nyc TLD on behalf of the local community is now posted: >> >> http://www.isoc-ny.org/?p=242 >> > >Some months ago Tom was in this forum himself, advancing the idea. There >were many objections and concerns raised, and he had answers for none of >them. > >"We deserve it" is not (or at least no longer) sufficient grounds for >getting a TLD. > >- Evan I wasn't around for that. The concept of a community-based non-profit registry seems laudable. He is unapologetically and, I guess, understandably, a bit woolly on the details, but firm on the principle. If you have specific comments on the content of the video - over and above the typos in his powerpoint, of which we have already apprised him - please feel free to add them as comments at the url above. .joly --------------------------------------------------------------- WWWhatsup NYC http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com ---------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

The pending death of a registry
by Danny Younger May 30, 2008

May 30, 2008

For those of you following the ongoing demise of .travel, here is its parent corporation's most recent filing: "Based upon the Company's current financial condition, as discussed above, and without the infusion of additional capital, management does not believe that the Company will be able to fund its operations beyond the end of May 2008." Form 10-Q for THEGLOBE COM INC: http://biz.yahoo.com/e/080509/tglo.ob10-q.html

4 8

Fast Flux Hosting 5 June 1300 UTC
by At-Large Staff May 30, 2008

May 30, 2008

Veuillez trouver la version française de ce message suivant plus bas Por favor véase el mensaje en español abajo Dear all, You are invited to join Dave Piscitello¹s Briefing Session on Fast Flux Hosting which will take place on 5 June at 1300 UTC. Please find the meeting page with participation instructions and documents below. https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?fast_flux_hosting French and Spanish interpretation is tentatively scheduled for this meeting. However, there is currently only one French and no Spanish speaking person who expressed interest in the Briefing session. As you can imagine, it takes a considerable amount of resources to organize a multilingual presentation and it is only worth doing if there is a real interest from the non-English speaking language communities for these events. If you would like to participate in the French or Spanish channel for this meeting, please write an email to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org. What is Fast Flux? "Fast flux" is an evasion technique that cyber-criminals and Internet miscreants use to evade identification and to frustrate law enforcement and anticrime efforts aimed at locating and shutting down web sites used for illegal purposes. Fast flux hosting supports a wide variety of cyber-crime activities (fraud, identity theft, online scams) and is considered one of the most serious threats to online activities today. One variant of fast flux hosting, "double flux", exploits the domain name registration and name resolution services. Cher(e)s membres, Vous êtes invité, par le biais d¹une téléconférence, à participer à une session d'information sur ³l'Accueil Rapide de Flux² (ou ³Fast Flux Hosting²) de Monsieur Dave Piscitello de la division Sécurité et Stabilité du Comité Consultatif (SSAC) d'ICANN, qui aura lieu le 5 juin à 13.00 UTC. Veuillez s¹il vous plait trouver ci-dessous la page de cette réunion avec les instructions de participation et les informations supplémentaires pour cette réunion. https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?fast_flux_hosting L'interprétation en français et en espagnole est programmée pour cette réunion. Cependant, il y a actuellement seulement une seule francophone et aucune personne hispanophones qui a montré un intérêt pour cette session d'information. Comme vous pouvez imaginer, il requiert une quantité considérable de ressources afin d¹organiser une présentation multilingues et il est seulement intéressant de le faire, si et seulement si, il y a un vrai intérêt des communautés non anglophones pour ces événements. Si vous voulez participer à cette conférence sur le canal français, envoyez s¹il vous plaît un email à staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Qu¹est-ce que l'Accueil Rapide de Flux? "L'Accueil Rapide de Flux" est une technique d'évasion que les cyber-criminels et les mécréants d'Internet emploient pour esquiver l'identification et pour frustrer le renforcement des lois et les efforts anticriminelles afin de non seulement localiser, mais aussi d¹arrêter les sites Internet utilisés à des buts illégaux. L'Accueil Rapide de Flux soutient une large variété d'activités cyber-criminelle (fraude, vol d'identité, escroqueries en ligne) et est considéré comme une des plus graves menaces des activités en ligne d¹aujourd'hui. Une variante de l'Accueil Rapide de Flux, les ³doubles flux" exploite l'enregistrement des Noms de Domaine et des Services de Résolution des Noms. Estimados miembros de At-Large, Les invitamos para la sesión de David Piscitello sobre el Fast Flux Hosting que será el 5 de Junio a las 1300 UTC. Véase la página web de este reunión telefónica para ver las instrucciones de participación. Cargaramos más documentos sobre la reunión en breve. https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?fast_flux_hosting La interpretación en lengua española y francesa es planeada de manera provisoria. Sin embargo, por el momento solo hay una persona de lengua francesa y ningún hispanohablante que ha manifestado su interés por esta presentación. Como se lo puede imaginar, organizar una presentación en varias idiomas necesita muchas recursos y solo valga la pena si existe interés suficiente da la comunidad no anglófona. En caso de que quiere participar en este reunión en el canal español o francés, escriba un email a staff(a)atlarge.icann.org por favor. Que es el Fast Flux Hosting? El Fast Flux es un método de evasión usada por criminales de Internet para evadir su identificación y así frustrar la lucha anticriminal de los autoridades que intentan localizar y cerrar los sitios Webs usados para fines ilegales. El Fast Flux Hosting es usado en varias actividades del ciber-crimen organizado tales como el fraude, el robo o suplantación de identidad y el engaño on-line y representa hoy en día una de las más serias amenazas para la actividad on-line de hoy. Otra variante del Fast Flux Hosting es el Double Flux, un método que se aprovecha de los servicios de registro de dominios. Regards, Cordialment, Cordialmente, Nick Ashton-Hart, Matthias Langenegger, Frederic Teboul ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org

1 0

Re: [At-Large] Request regarding your views on GNSO Improvements into Board Discussion
by Jeffrey A. Williams May 30, 2008

May 30, 2008

Wendy and all, Although Cheryl may believe that the ALAC supports the proposed tripartite model, I can only actually count 5 ALAC posters that support such and have clearly stated as much. Ergo as liason, to put forth the view that the ALAC supports such as a whole would be less than accurate. Secondly, as the ALAC has so few actual known members, and seemingly only about 30 or so individual user members, it is difficult to see how any claim of the ALAC to represent individual users. As such, it would be much more appropriate that whatever you put forth to be sure that this recognition is fully discribed. -----Original Message----- >From: Wendy Seltzer <wendy(a)seltzer.com> >Sent: May 29, 2008 1:45 AM >To: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr(a)gmail.com> >Cc: At-Large writ small <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >Subject: Re: [At-Large] Request regarding your views on GNSO Improvements into Board Discussion > >Hi Cheryl, > >Apology accepted. > >I fully intend to put forward the views of ALAC, and not my own. To the >extent that I can get the ALAC reasoning supporing those views, I can >make a stronger case than if I'm simply left to rely on adherence to a >joint statement. > >As is, I suspect my sole contribution to what may be a heated debate, >will have to be "ALAC supports the joint user statement, specifically >expressing concern that there be strong and equitable individual user >representation in the GNSO." > >--Wendy > >Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote: >> Wendy, >> >> With from the ridiculous number of glitches, technical issues and >> interventions / interruptions with the French Chanel interpreter last night >> I felt that the ALAC may perhaps not have yet made itself clear to you on >> what we desire to have you as Board Liaison impart to the Board regarding >> the status of ALAC support and endorsement for the Joint UC statement and >> the proposed tripartite model... >> >> I apologise for the delay in sending this to you but it should arrive in >> time for you to read *before* the Board meeting and I am in a national >> conference yesterday and today (not able to connect other than in a break >> and this has been my first chance)... >> >> If I understood and interpreted you correctly, then you may be planning to >> not simply forward in addition to our May ALAC statements/position pieces >> and further the argument for full,(and within the User Constituencies mix) >> an equitable part for Internet users, (including DNS Registrants and non >> registrants) i.e. the At-Large Community in a a redesigned GNSO structure, >> but perhaps to indicate that this overarching principle is a modification of >> / alteration to / or new view separate from, that which is outlined in the >> Joint UC Proposal... If am wrong or misinterpreting your intent here then >> I do most humbly apologise. >> >> I therefore as Chair, write to you to state that, whilst your personal >> opinion will naturally be transmitted to the Board in your personal >> capacity the ALAC view is as we have recently described and reviewed at >> considerable length in several documents and messages. You are required to " to >> put the collective views of the ALAC, always, in front of their own. (ROP >> 4.8) *and *"To communicate and advocate the positions of the ALAC to [the >> Board]..." (ROP 5.7). >> >> Any indication by you as an ALAC Liaison, that the Joint UC is not endorsed >> or that we have moved back from our position of support of its proposal on >> structure to the Board, would be a matter in our opinion of you 'not acting >> in the best interests of the ALAC'. >> >> An example of a suitable and non personally compromising statement to the >> Board would be along the lines of what Vanda as ALAC Vice Chair, recently >> sent to The Board Chair in response to a question on this matter to the GNSO >> improvements BGC which I have copied below... >> >> <snip>Para: 'Peter Dengate Thrush' >> Assunto: RES: Future Board discussion and resolution on the matter of GNSO >> Improvements - Specifically GNSO structure. >> >> Peter, being with ALAC, I should not have other comments than ALAC's >> position already stated. >> Best, >> Vanda <end snip> >> > > >-- >Wendy Seltzer -- wendy(a)seltzer.org >Visiting Professor, Northeastern University School of Law >Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society >http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html >http://www.chillingeffects.org/ >https://www.torproject.org/ > >_______________________________________________ >ALAC mailing list >ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

3 2

At-Large community event, 21 June 2008
by At-Large Staff May 30, 2008

May 30, 2008

Dear all, We plan to have an At-Large community dinner at the ICANN Paris meeting and would like to invite you to this event. Before we go forward with the preparations, we would like to know how many of you are likely to participate. If you are in Paris on the evening of Saturday, 21 June and would like to participate, please follow the link below and put in your name. http://www.doodle.ch/ddihym5hhpeuhdwt Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Matthias Langenegger, Frederic Teboul ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org

1 1

Re: [At-Large] Request regarding your views on GNSO Improvements into Board Discussion
by Jeffrey A. Williams May 30, 2008

May 30, 2008

Danny and all, Agreed to all of your points but #7. It need not be necessary for the GNSO to exhume the whole expense of language translation, other NGO's can belly up to the bar and volunteer to take on some of that expense, as well as automated language translation software has, will, and can reduce this cost significantly, all be it that some few ALAC members may have some "Culture" related problems with such. Those that do should be the ones doing the volunteering. -----Original Message----- >From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger(a)yahoo.com> >Sent: May 29, 2008 4:22 AM >To: At-Large Worldwide <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >Subject: [At-Large] Request regarding your views on GNSO Improvements into Board Discussion > >Wendy, > >Thank you for your comment on this topic. I am sure >that if asked you will indicate that: > >1. The ALAC never took a formal vote on the Statement >2. No members of the ALAC from regions other than NA >expressed any views whatsoever on the topic on the >at-large discussion list (which is not surprising as >they rarely express any opinions on anything). >3. The work of the ad-hoc GNSO Improvements Working >Group was totally non-transparent (not even an >archived discussion list). >4. The broad At-Large community was not afforded an >opportunity to discuss the Joint document prior to its >release. >5. There are those in the at-large that do not >support the concept of eliminating Non-Com >representation in the GNSO. >6. Some in the at-large view the statement that >"At-Large would not accept anything less than 50% of >the voting power of the Non-Commercial Interest >Group", as ludicrous. >7. Some regard the ALAC push for a multilingual >approach within the GNSO to be a foolish waste of >money and point to the horrid expenditures on the part >of the ALAC for contracted (yet unused) translation >services. >8. The comment "Since as mentioned the At-Large >community has been actively engaged in developing and >implementing new approaches to a working group >modality for policy development, some >of the experiences we have had in that process may >prove salutary", is an insult to the intelligence of >the community. > > > > >_______________________________________________ >ALAC mailing list >ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

1 0

Re: [At-Large] Not the pending death of a registry
by Jeffrey A. Williams May 30, 2008

May 30, 2008

Danny and all, It would be a mistake of huge proportions for ICANN to get involved in the business decisions of sTLD or gTLD registries before or after the fact that such a registry has been established. ICANN simply doesn't have the horses nor the business acumen to do so, and such is not associated with ICANN's mandate. Quite simply, .TRAVEL NEVER had a fighting chance of being a commercial private enterprize success. The travel industry is shrinking due to fuel costs and has been for nerly 10 years, ergo the travel market space represented in a sTLD is up against it, and has been for some time now. Secondly due to the increase of terrorist threats, air travel especially is taking huge hits still and will for the forseeable future. -----Original Message----- >From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger(a)yahoo.com> >Sent: May 29, 2008 8:05 PM >To: John Levine <johnl(a)iecc.com> >Cc: At-Large Worldwide <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>, Edward Hasbrouck <edward(a)hasbrouck.org> >Subject: Re: [At-Large] Not the pending death of a registry > >John, > >I spotted two remarks in the slightly earlier 10K >filing at >http://sec.edgar-online.com/2008/03/27/0001144204-08-017833/Section12.asp > >"However, management does not believe that the >consummation of the Proposed Tralliance Transaction >will, in itself, allow the Company to become >profitable and generate operating cash flows >sufficient to fund its operations and pay its existing >current liabilities (including those liabilities >related to its discontinued operations) in the >foreseeable future." > >Also, this phrase (which was repeated in the >subsequent 10Q): "It is our preference to avoid >filing for protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code." > >...which leads us to the gTLD Registry Failover >Exercise After Action Report that stated: > >"The exercise highlighted the difficulty in >implementing portions of the plan when a company has >declared bankruptcy or is in receivership. > >Discussion: Bankruptcy of a Registry/Backend Provider > >Declaration of bankruptcy by a registry or backend >provider could place the company under control of the >courts, and potentially negatively impact registrants >and affect the level/quality of DNS service within the >affected TLD. The exercise highlighted difficulty in >the implementation of portions of the plan when a >company has declared bankruptcy or is in receivership. > >Recommendation: > >ICANN to undertake a more-thorough examination of the >affect of bankruptcy on the draft ICANN gTLD Registry >Failover Plan. Recommend the development of >detailed internal procedures and courses of action to >provide guidance during a registry bankruptcy on >registrants of the affected gTLD." > >Perhaps in view of current circumstances ICANN should >accelerate its proposed more-thorough examination of >the affect of bankruptcy. > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >ALAC mailing list >ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827

1 0

Weekly posting summary for alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten May 30, 2008

May 30, 2008

Total of 122 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri May 30 00:53:02 EDT 2008 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 1.64% | 2 | 23.39% | 289361 | cheryl at hovtek.com.au 12.30% | 15 | 11.27% | 139446 | lists at privaterra.info 10.66% | 13 | 8.89% | 109975 | jam at jacquelinemorris.com 10.66% | 13 | 6.91% | 85494 | evan at telly.org 9.02% | 11 | 8.21% | 101551 | jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com 7.38% | 9 | 5.50% | 68098 | jefsey at jefsey.com 6.56% | 8 | 4.00% | 49509 | johnl at iecc.com 4.92% | 6 | 4.91% | 60771 | veni at veni.com 4.10% | 5 | 2.35% | 29102 | dannyyounger at yahoo.com 2.46% | 3 | 3.04% | 37650 | roberto at icann.org 3.28% | 4 | 1.93% | 23907 | michele at blacknight.ie 2.46% | 3 | 1.75% | 21592 | wendy at seltzer.com 2.46% | 3 | 1.61% | 19956 | dthompson at gov.nu.ca 2.46% | 3 | 1.61% | 19883 | ross at tucows.com 2.46% | 3 | 1.52% | 18852 | patrick at vande-walle.eu 1.64% | 2 | 1.27% | 15772 | kieren.mccarthy at icann.org 1.64% | 2 | 1.23% | 15190 | matthias.langenegger at icann.org 1.64% | 2 | 1.20% | 14815 | alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca 1.64% | 2 | 1.09% | 13513 | admin at isoc.sd 1.64% | 2 | 0.98% | 12119 | joly at punkcast.com 0.82% | 1 | 0.91% | 11306 | bfausett at internet.law.pro 0.82% | 1 | 0.88% | 10835 | derek at aa419.org 0.82% | 1 | 0.85% | 10576 | dominik.filipp at dsoft.sk 0.82% | 1 | 0.75% | 9250 | shahshah at irnic.ir 0.82% | 1 | 0.67% | 8336 | lbleriot at gmail.com 0.82% | 1 | 0.61% | 7528 | narten at us.ibm.com 0.82% | 1 | 0.61% | 7510 | hongxueipr at gmail.com 0.82% | 1 | 0.61% | 7504 | iza at anr.org 0.82% | 1 | 0.52% | 6430 | ajp at glocom.ac.jp 0.82% | 1 | 0.47% | 5832 | staff at atlarge.icann.org 0.82% | 1 | 0.45% | 5554 | elisabeth.porteneuve at cetp.ipsl.fr --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 122 |100.00% | 1237217 | Total

1 0