- At-Large - lists.icann.org

ICANN Blog : Relying on ICANN Community-Developed Processes for a Safe, Secure Interne
by Dev Anand Teelucksingh Jan. 8, 2022

Jan. 8, 2022

ICANN Blog : Relying on ICANN Community-Developed Processes for a Safe, Secure Internet 5 January 2022 John Jeffrey <https://www.icann.org/#>, General Counsel and Secretary, Co-Deputy to the President and CEOTheresa Swinehart <https://www.icann.org/#>, SVP, Global Domains and Strategy, Co-Deputy to the President and CEO We have observed community discussions and received comments and questions about ICANN's top-level domain (TLD) Registry Agreement assignment approval process and a recent Urgent Reconsideration Request considered by the ICANN Board Accountability Mechanisms Committee (BAMC). We believe it is important to provide context to some of these discussions. https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/relying-on-icann-community-developed…

6 9

Separate issues
by Roberto Gaetano Jan. 5, 2022

Jan. 5, 2022

Hi all IMHO, we have separate issues that we might want to keep separated. The first issue is about the original point Jeff is making, about whether there is a problem about whether his reconsideration request has been properly dealt with and/or there has been a retaliation or other consequences. This is a question about the process, not the person, and I am extremely surprised that it spawned consideration about the person. It is by and large irrelevant whether Jeff has a conflict of interest, ALAC should look a the process itself and if there has been some misbehaviour - or even a mistaken in the process - it should act regardless what role the claimant has and not wait until the same issue hits a person that does not have any involvement with the contracted parties. The second issue is about the conflict of interest. Here as well we must abstract from the specific case and ask whether the CoI policy is sound or need modification. IANAL, but it looks to me that the procedure followed by Jeff is the correct one as related to his nomination: he has declared his potential conflict at application time, correctly omitting the name of the TLD he might get involved in. Sure, he should have updated his SOI more promptly. OTOH, I doubt that any subscriber to this mailing list does not know the involvement of Jeff with the contracted parties. So, the question is whether the CoI policy and the management (and actualisation) of SOIs are sound or need revision, and that is again something that is orthogonal to the practical case. Last but not least, the Multi-Stakeholder Model. I am not a theorist, so my opinion is not authoritative, but I personally believe that a process in which all potential stakeholders are involved guarantees better - and more stable - results than a process in which some forces are prevailing over others. I can discuss whether ICANN applies it correctly, whether it is necessary to improve it to make it “global” (i.e. independent from geopolitics) and “equal” (i.e. with a balanced power of the stakeholders), but I firmly believe that this is the best answer - surely superior to the classical multilateral approach, that gives the ultimate power to agreement by the governments. I agree that some, but not all, the UN organisations have introduced some perfume of involvement by other stakeholder types, whether business, civil society, or other, but we cannot forget that the ultimate power of the UN system resides in the UNGA, where the vote is cast by the governments only. Just an additional note about the last point, related to ICANN’s model. I personally believe that nowadays the table is tilted to favour contracted parties, and the fact that some business interests are linked to contracted parties makes the matter even worse, but I also believe that a sort of people’s tribunal whether it is the users - or even generally the non-contracted parties - the sole arbiter of the behaviour of the contracted parties is a non-starter. Of course, we should achieve better collaboration among stakeholders while sometimes we have confrontation with little effort to reach a compromise, but this only means to me that the model has to be improved, not abandoned. Cheers, and Happy New Year Roberto

6 5

12 Streams 2021 #9 - AprIGF Showcase 2 'Internet’s Technical Success Factors'
by Joly MacFie Jan. 4, 2022

Jan. 4, 2022

After the presentation here, you will see Olaf Kolkman step up with a mapping to ISOC's 'Internet Way of Networking' framework. The finished study was presented at the Global IGF on Dec 8 2021, video of that can be seen at https://youtu.be/nl1n4VGRHng ISOC Live posted: "On Monday January 3 2022, the ninth installment of the Internet Society Livestreaming‘s ‘12 Days of Streams‘ annual highlights features the Asia Pacific Internet Governance Forum (AprIGF) Showcase #2 entitled 'Internet’s Technical Success Factors' from Se" [image: livestream]On *Monday January 3 2022*, the ninth installment of the Internet Society Livestreaming‘s ‘*12 Days of Streams <https://isoc.live/?s=%2312streams>*‘ annual highlights features the *Asia Pacific Internet Governance Forum <https://aprigf.org.np/>* (AprIGF) Showcase #2 entitled '*Internet’s Technical Success Factors <https://report.analysysmason.com/internet_success_factors/>*' from September 29 2021. This was a presentation of a preliminary report on an* Analysys Mason study <https://report.analysysmason.com/internet_success_factors/>*, jointly commissioned by *APNIC <https://www.apnic.net/>* and *LACNIC <https://www.lacnic.net/>*, of whether the Internet continues to be "fit for purpose". *INTRODUCTION* *Paul Wilson*, APNIC *PRESENTERS* *Michael Kende*, Analysys Mason *Julia Allford*, Analysys Mason *Amund Kvalbein*, Analysys Mason *HOST / MODERATOR* *Joyce Chen*, APNIC *VIEW ON LIVESTREAM: https://livestream.com/internetsociety/12streams2021-9 <https://livestream.com/internetsociety/12streams2021-9>* (Open captions) *TWITTER #12Streams <http://bit.ly/2t12HX2J> #APrIGF2021 @aprigf2021 @aprigf_official @lacnic @APNIC @AnalysysMason @amundkvalbein @MichaelKende @kolkman #IWN #captioned* *SIMULCASTS* *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ <https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/>* *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive <https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive>* *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/ <https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/>* *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/12streams2021-9 <https://archive.org/details/12streams2021-9>* *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14964/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- -

1 0

12Streams 2021 #4 – Open Standards Everywhere – Dan York
by Joly MacFie Dec. 30, 2021

Dec. 30, 2021

The ISOC Fundamentals series was a marathon event, taking place over a couple of weeks in April 2021, where each of 6 topics, Encryption, Community Networks, Infracom, Open Standards for Webservers, MANRS, Internet Way of Networking, was explored in 4 separate sessions, in 3 different languages, aimed at ISOC chapters and members in different regions, The entire thing is archived here <https://archive.org/details/isoc-fundamentals> ISOC Live posted: "Today, Wednesday December 28 2021, at 11:55pm EST (04:55 UTC Dec29) in the fourth instalment of the Internet Society Livestreaming‘s ‘12 Days of Streams‘ annual highlights, we feature a session the Internet Society's Fundamentals Series in April 2021. Dan" [image: livestream] <https://livestream.com/internetsociety/12streams2021-4>Today, *Wednesday December 28 2021*, at *11:55pm EST* (04:55 UTC Dec29) in the fourth instalment of the Internet Society Livestreaming‘s ‘*12 Days of Streams <https://isoc.live/?s=%2312streams>*‘ annual highlights, we feature a session the *Internet Society's Fundamentals Series <https://isoc.live/isoc-fundamentals/>* in April 2021. *Dan York <https://twitter.com/danyork>*, Director of Online Content, gives Chapters a primer on the '*Open Standards Everywhere <https://www.internetsociety.org/issues/open-standards-everywhere/>*' (OSE) project which aims to promote best practices to secure web servers. *VIEW ON LIVESTREAM:* https://livestream.com/internetsociety/12streams2021-4 (Open captions) *TWITTER #12Streams <http://bit.ly/2t12HX2J> #OSE @danyork @InternetSociety @ISOC_Community #ISOCFundamentals #StrongInternet* *SIMULCASTS* *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ <https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/>* *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive <https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive>* *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/ <https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/>* *GITHUB* *https://github.com/InternetSociety/ose-documentation <https://github.com/InternetSociety/ose-documentation>* *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/12streams2021-4 <https://archive.org/details/12streams2021-4>* *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14935/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- -

1 0

The latest ccNSO news for you | December 2021
by Lianna Galstyan Dec. 21, 2021

Dec. 21, 2021

Dear At-Large Community, The final issue of ccNSO newsletter for 2021 is out. You can find updates of (s)elections for the ccNSO Council members; reflections of Internet governance hot topics for all regions brought by members of the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC) and perspectives of ccNSO role with respect to DNS abuse. Best, Lianna ccNSO-logo.jpeg ccNSO News December 2021 | Issue 35 Screenshot 2021-08-02 at 12.51.32.png Draft the ccNSO Conflict of Interest Guideline The ccNSO Council requested the ccNSO Guideline Review Committee (GRC) to create a ccNSO Conflict of Interest (COI) Guideline. The GRC seeks volunteers for a subgroup that will focus specifically on this task. This call for volunteers closes Friday, 14 January 2022 (23:59 UTC) Read more <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014-pBwKav9lKj-Ap4R45cZOMuZX9B16duAviHPVnNcNw…> Select the winners of the ICANN Community Excellence Award The ccNSO Council is now looking for two (2) volunteers to serve on the ICANN Community Excellence Award Selection Panel on behalf of the ccNSO. This call for volunteers closes Wednesday, 22 December 2021 (noon UTC). Read more <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014-pBwKav9lKj-Ap4R45cZOMuZX9B16duAviHPVnNcNw…> Stay informed about the work of the ccNSO In preparation of each ccNSO Council meeting, a written update regarding the work by the various working groups and committees is drafted. It includes information about the current status, next steps and what the activities are about. The December edition is out now. Read more <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014-pBwKav9lKj-Ap4R45cZOMuZX9B16duAviHPVnNcNw…> Internet Governance: What are the hot topics? wordcloud _1_.png ICANN has five geographical regions. The members of the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC) reflected on what the hot internet governance topics are for each of the five regions. Are there overlaps? Major differences? Find out here <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014-pBwKav9lKj-Ap4R45cZOMuZX9B16duAviHPVnNcNw…> Tip!Watch to the recording <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014-pBwKav9lKj-Ap4R45cZOMuZX9B16duAviHPVnNcNw…>of the pre-ICANN72 ccTLD News Session on this topic. In January 2022, the IGLC will launch a call for volunteers. To learn more, join us on Wednesday, 19 January 2022 at 08:30 UTC for a short webinar, hosted by IGLC chair Pierre Bonis (.fr). This webinar is targeted at potential new IGLC members and those want to learn more about the work of the IGLC. More information will soon be posted on the ccNSO website. Help shape future sessions: for and by ccTLDs Screenshot 2021-12-15 at 12.48.17.png Pre-ICANN73 ccTLD News Sessions Keep an eye out for the call for presentation proposals In March 2022, the ccNSO Meetings Programme Committee (MPC) will hold the next edition of the virtual ccTLD News Sessions. The MPC will soon issue a call for presentations and is seeking speakers on a variety of ccTLD-related topics. There will be two options to participate. · Session 1 | Wednesday, 2 March 2022, 13 UTC · Session 2 | Thursday, 3 March 2022, 7 UTC Each 90-minute session has a unique agenda. The sessions are an excellent opportunity for both experienced and new people to meet, share best practices, be informed about trends, and and discuss ccTLD-related aspects. When creating the agenda, the MPC intends to put a focus on contributions regarding capacity building efforts by ccTLDs. Read more <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014-pBwKav9lKj-Ap4R45cZOMuZX9B16duAviHPVnNcNw…>. Join the MPC More to come in January! Do you have a finger on the pulse? What are the latest topics and trends ccTLD world? Do you have experience with agenda setting? The MPC needs you! In January 2022, the MPC will launch a call for volunteers. To learn more, join us on Wednesday, 26 January 2022 at 13 UTC for a short webinar, hosted by MPC chair Barbara Povse (.si). This webinar is targeted at potential MPC members and those want to learn more about the work of the MPC. More information will soon be posted on the ccNSO website. About the MPC The MPC coordinates and manages the high-level schedule of the ccNSO-related sessions and related matters, including the ccNSO Members Meeting agenda at ICANN public meetings. Membership of the Committee is open to all ccTLD managers (whether members or non-members of the ccNSO). Meet the ccNSO Members angie-potrait.jpg Privacy should not be for sale The Impact of Data Protection Legislation on ccTLDs Angela Matlapeng is .bw Administration Staff, Vice Chairperson at AfTLD - the African Regional Organisation, and member of the ccNSO Internet Governance Liaison Committee (IGLC). Angela reflected on the impact of data protection legislation on ccTLDs. In her article, she focuses on the case of the Botswana ccTLD. She talks about how data protection legislation creates an uneven playing field for registrars from different continents, and how essential it is to strike a balance between protecting end user personal data and DNS Abuse mitigation. Read the article by Angela Matlapeng here <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014-pBwKav9lKj-Ap4R45cZOMuZX9B16duAviHPVnNcNw…>. ccNSO Council Highlights Screenshot 2021-09-27 at 15.21.09.png The ccNSO Council had its 178th meeting on Thursday, 16 November 2021. The ccNSO Council will reconvene on 27 January 2022 at 12:00 UTC. Council meetings are open to observers. Contact the ccNSO Secretariat <mailto:ccnsosecretariat@icann.org>for participation details. Highlights from recent Council discussions: ccNSO Council elections The ccNSO Council adopted two election reports: * Regular annual Council elections In March 2022, at the conclusion of ICANN73, the 3-year term of five ccNSO Councillors ends. The ccNSO opened a call for nominations to fill those seats. For the Asia-Pacific region, 2 candidates stepped forward and the ccNSO members from the Asia-Pacific participated in an election. For the other regions only one candidate was nominated and seconded: no elections needed to be held in those regions. The incumbent members were appointed for another 3-year term: Africa: Biyi Oladipo, Asia Pacific: Jordan Carter, Europe: Nick Wenban-Smith, Latin America/Caribbean: Demi Getschko, North America: Pablo Rodriguez. * Special Council elections EU region Giovanni Seppia will step down from the ccNSO Council on 31 December 2021. The ccNSO members in the European Region selected Chris Disspain for the remainder of Giovanni's term (until March 2023). Chris will take the seat on the Council on 1 January 2022. Read more here <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014-pBwKav9lKj-Ap4R45cZOMuZX9B16duAviHPVnNcNw…>. The role of the ccNSO with respect to DNS Abuse The ccNSO Council invited the ccTLD Community to join a public workshop on Thursday, 18 November 2021 at 12:00 UTC. During the workshop Councillors and members from the ccTLD community further discussed the suggestions from the ICANN72 DNS Abuse Session regarding suggested activities the ccNSO could undertake to complement existing work by the community. During the December Council meeting, a small group of Councillors presented their findings from the ICANN72 session and the November workshop. A plan is expected to be presented to the ccTLD community in early 2022. The goal is to launch the ccNSO activities with respect to DNS abuse by ICANN73. Revamp ICANN Learn ccNSO onboarding Course A small team of ccTLD volunteers performed an extensive revision of the current ccNSO Onboarding Course (ICANN Learn identifier 150.1), addressing both content, accessibility, the level of engagement and other aspects. Thesmall team will soon finalise its recommendation to the ccNSO OISC and Council, for final review and adoption. The aim is having the course eventually translated in the various languages ICANN provides translations in. New ccNSO Rules The ccNSO Guidelines Review Committee subgroup on Rules invited the ccTLD Community to join a public webinar <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014-pBwKav9lKj-Ap4R45cZOMuZX9B16duAviHPVnNcNw…>on Thursday, 9 December 2021 at 13:00 UTC. The subgroup presented their latest draft of the updated ccNSO Rules, which is open for comments until Thursday, 23 December 2021. Based on the feedback, the Working Group will finalize its draft, which will be put before the ccNSO membership for adoption through a voting process around end February 2022. High-level ccNSO schedule at ICANN73 The ccNSO Council will conduct its monthly meeting in March at the occasion of ICANN73. Moreover, it will hold a number of joint sessions, with GNSO, GAC, and the ccNSO-related ICANN Board members. The Tech Working Group is planning for Tech Day, whereas the MPC) expects to organise two sessions as part of the ccNSO Members’ meetings: * A governance session, on the New ccNSO Rules and a ccNSO Conflict of Interest Guideline * A ccNSO & DNS Abuse Session. The MPC also organises 2 editions of the ccTLD N <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014-pBwKav9lKj-Ap4R45cZOMuZX9B16duAviHPVnNcNw…> <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014-pBwKav9lKj-Ap4R45cZOMuZX9B16duAviHPVnNcNw…>ews Sessions <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014-pBwKav9lKj-Ap4R45cZOMuZX9B16duAviHPVnNcNw…>, prior to ICANN73. Happy holidays from the ccNSO! ICANN will be closed from 24 December through 1 January 2022. We wish you and your family a happy and safe holiday season! Screenshot 2019-12-20 at 11.35.26.png country code Names Supporting Organisationhttps://ccnso.icann.org <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014-pBwKav9lKj-Ap4R45cZOMuZX9B16duAviHPVnNcNw…>| ccnsosecretariat(a)icann.org <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014-pBwKav9lKj-Ap4R45cZOMuZX9B16duAviHPVnNcNw…> Facebook <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014-pBwKav9lKj-Ap4R45cZOMuZX9B16duAviHPVnNcNw…> Twitter <https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0014-pBwKav9lKj-Ap4R45cZOMuZX9B16duAviHPVnNcNw…> ICANN| 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536

1 0

Re: [At-Large] [Governance] India
by parminder Dec. 14, 2021

Dec. 14, 2021

On 13/12/21 10:13 pm, Murali Shanmugavelan wrote: > "India has a non aligned background..."?!?!? India was a major force in building the nonalignment movement -- that is what 'background' means... As for the current status, my email amply lays is out, See "... the deep embeddedness that India has in the US centric techno-sphere...". Although it still does -- even if just bec it is a big country and needs enough independence,-- try 'some degree' of maintaining independence, or, in other words, a 'diversity of dependences', like the S 400 missile story tell us... parminder > > On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 at 14:16, parminder via Governance > <governance(a)lists.igcaucus.org <mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org>> > wrote: > > Dear Wolfgang, > > Thanks for the quotes about the Putin -- Modi meeting. Indeed in > most mainstream coverage in India the ICT side hardly got > mentioned. They were the less important part of the summit. > > I am not sure what kind of comments you are looking for from me. > > India has a non aligned background and it is normal for such a > large country like India to hedge its bets and not get caught in > one geo-techno-enclosure or the other, in the old cold war like > sense, but now with digital tech dependencies which are even > deeper, stronger and largely irreversible. It therefore makes > complete sense that India is exploring ICT relationships with > Russia, to/inter alia/ diversify from the deep embeddedness that > India has in the US centric techno-sphere. Do you disapprove of > it? See my article of a few years back India should aim for > digital non alignment > <https://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/india-should-aim-for-a-digital-non-…> > > BTW, one of the key current issues in India-Russia relationship > (also highlighted around the summit) is that India is buying S > 400 missiles from Russia, despite strong warnings from the US that > this may lead to India being excluded from US military supplies. > > Perhaps that would put in good perspective Russia-India techno > relationships that seem to so rent your mind. > > From your quoted text, you seem to have issues or questions about > Russia and India deciding to work together on the proposed UN > cyber crime treaty... > > Do you think there should NOT be any such UN treaty? > > Does that mean countries should rather sign on Europe's Budapest > Convention on Cybercrime, or wait for new ones to come from OECD's > CDEP (committee on digital economy policy) or from the CoE? You > know why India and other countries refuse to sign on the Budapest > Convention -- actually they find nothing wrong with its substance, > but they refuse to be governed by rules that they were not a part > of developing... Makes any democratic sense to you? > > If not Budapest Convention, what is the option .. The world stay > without a cyber crime framework? Why should not all countries sit > together to make a cyber crime convention? Happy to hear your > reasons either way. > > About multistakeholder participation in such a UN cyber crime > convention, which seems to be one major concern of yours: > > I have been arguing long for a horizontal UN digital policy body, > with the SAME multistakeholder participation model as OECD's CDEP > (and of CoE where the Budapest Convention was made) ... If we had > that UN body , we could have employed its structure for MS > participation for developing the proposed UN convention on cyber > crime ... But, THE PROBLEM IS, you have consistently opposed it, > including as part of the UN WG on enhanced cooperation which had > the precise mandate to develop institutional structures for UN > based digital policy making. We both were members of that WG and > we know what went on there, right. How developing countries > proposed the exact same OECD model for UN level digital policy > making -- along with all its MS components/ characteristics -- AND > YOU ALL TURNED IT DOWN. Am I making any mis-statement here? Happy > to be corrected in that case. > > So, perhaps now it is your turn to answer some questions: > > 1. Do you think that there should be no UN cyber crime convention, > and all non Europeans too should simply sign Europe's Budapest > Convention, and further wait for more cyber governance frameworks > from OECD's CDEP, or CoE's digital policy mechanisms? > > 2. Why and how you call OECD's CDEP and CoE's digital policy > making processes as multistakeholder, and those are acceptable to > you, but the EXACT SAME model at the UN becomes multi-lateral and > NOT multistakeholder - -and, apparently for that reason, not > acceptable to you ? > > thanks and look forward to your responses > > parminder > > PS: You raise concerns about India-Russia parleys and digital > rights issues (internet shutdowns). Last year India signed this > with US led five eyes against eend-to-end encryption > https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/international-statement-end-end-encryption-a… > <https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/international-statement-end-end-encryption-a…> > .. Just seeking a better balance of geo-political concerns from you. > > > > On 08/12/21 4:46 pm, Wolfgang Kleinwächter wrote: >> Wolfgang: >> Is the Putin/Modi Summit related to the Indian Internet Shutdowns? >> >> Parminder: >> >> I have seen and heard of no connection of that kind. In any case, >> nations nowadays need no external assistance to control their >> respective Internets. As for foreign alliances, if anything India >> is certainly bending much more towards US led alliances, that >> claim some western values of democracy, HR, etc ( all of which is >> of course a lot of BS, and simply good old-fashioned geopolitics >> and geo- economics under new garbs -- one significant >> manifestation and result of which kind of geo-politics/ >> geoeconomics is neo-colonisation) .. >> >> >> Wolfgang: >> As I can see, Internet Governance (cybersecurity and digital >> economny) was part of the discussions. >> >> This is from the Putin-Modi Meeting: "The Sides appreciated close >> cooperation in the field of security in the use of Information >> and Communication Technologies (ICT) through inter-agency >> cooperation under bilateral mechanisms and at multilateral >> platforms. They highlighted the leading role of the United >> Nations in the decision-making process on security in the use of >> ICTs. The Sides also recognized the need for further work on >> rules, norms and principles of responsible behavior of State >> aimed at preventing conflicts and promoting peaceful use of ICTs. >> The Sides reaffirmed the importance of international cooperation >> against criminal use of ICTs and in this regard they welcome the >> establishment of an open- ended Ad hoc intergovernmental >> committee of experts to elaborate a comprehensive international >> convention on countering the use of ICTs for criminal purposes as >> stipulated in the UN GA resolutions 74/247 and 75/282." ... "The >> Sides intend to focus particularly on increasing the >> effectiveness of countering terrorism, extremism, drug >> trafficking, cross-border organized crime, and information >> security threats," ... "The Sides agreed that safeguarding of >> global commons including our oceans, outer space and information >> space should be based on the principles of transparency, >> accessibility and upholding international law." >> >> And they discussed also digital economy: " The Sides also agreed >> to facilitate collaboration between government and private sector >> organizations to find ways of joint development of software >> products, platforms and services as well as in the area of >> electronics manufacturing. The Sides confirmed their interest in >> further developing cooperation in the sphere of digital >> technologies, including those related to information protection, >> security of critical infrastructure and law enforcement." >> >> Any comment? BTW, no references to civil society or a >> multistakeholder approach. >> >> see: http://en.kremlin.ru/supplement/5745 >> <http://en.kremlin.ru/supplement/5745> >> > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance(a)lists.igcaucus.org <mailto:Governance@lists.igcaucus.org> > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > <https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance> >

1 0

India
by Wolfgang Kleinwächter Dec. 11, 2021

Dec. 11, 2021

3 4

WEBCAST: IGF2021 Dynamic Coalition on Core Internet Values – Internet Regulation during Crisis One Year Later
by Joly MacFie Dec. 10, 2021

Dec. 10, 2021

This is the one IGF session I never miss! [image: livestream] <http://livestream.com/internetsociety/dc-civ2021>On *Friday 10 December 2021* at *8:30-10:00 UTC* the *Dynamic Coalition on Core Internet Values <https://www.intgovforum.org/content/dynamic-coalition-on-core-internet-valu…>* (DC-CIV) will hold its *IGF 2021 <https://www.intgovforum.org/en/dashboard/igf-2021>* session '*Internet Regulation during Crisis One Year Later <https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-dc-civ-internet-regulation-…>* '. The Global Pandemic has now impacted our daily lives for a longer time than most of us would have imagined a year ago. In 2020, the Coalition's Session was entitled: "*Internet in Crisis Management and Renewal <https://archive.org/details/dc-civ2020>*" - and this Crisis has continued to be the past year's "new normal". The Internet's impact has increased dramatically in all aspects of everyone's lives. Technically, it has coped well with this increased use, but there have also been calls for increased control and regulation. The DC on Core Internet Values will discuss these developments and these calls for regulation --- and explore whether these break Core Internet Values - including a comparison with the *6F Framework <https://archive.org/download/dc-civ2020/dc-civ2020_Pisanty_SLIDES.pdf>*. *SPEAKERS* *Olivier Crépin-Leblond*, ISOC UK England *Olga Makarova*, MTS *Alison Harcourt*, University of Exeter *Bob Frankston* *Jutta Croll, *German Digital Opportunities Foundation. *Desiree Miloshevic*, Global Initiative for Human-centred Digital Governance *MODERATOR* *Alejandro Pisanty*, UNAM *RAPPORTEUR* *Sivasubramanian Muthusamy*, APG *LIVESTREAM http://livestream.com/internetsociety/dc-civ2021 <http://livestream.com/internetsociety/dc-civ2021>* *AGENDA https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-dc-civ-internet-regulation-… <https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-dc-civ-internet-regulation-…>* *PARTICIPATE VIA ZOOM https://bit.ly/3ye9flT <https://bit.ly/3ye9flT>* *REAL TIME TEXT https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=CFI-IGF-CR8 <https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=CFI-IGF-CR8>* *TWITTER #IGF2021 #coreinternetvalues #dcciv <https://bit.ly/31Rrvpf> @Olivier_CL lga Makarova @alieliale Desiree Miloshevic @BobFrankston Jutta Croll* SIMULCAST *https://youtu.be/duYfGeENup4 <https://bit.ly/31Rrvpf>* (IGF) *https://www.facebook.com/IntGovForum/live* <https://www.facebook.com/IntGovForum/live> *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ <https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/>* *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive <https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive>* *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc <https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc>* *https://www.facebook.com/CoreInternetValues <https://www.facebook.com/CoreInternetValues>* *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/dc-civ2021 <https://archive.org/details/dc-civ2021>* *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14864/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- -

1 0

Fwd: [IGF 2021] Subject: Experience IGF Music Night!
by Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond Dec. 9, 2021

Dec. 9, 2021

FYI - so looking forward to a future GEMS concert.... Put your hands together for the stars of the day: Thomas, Wout and Michal. They rocked! Watch this now: https://youtu.be/pntuDFUgNRI?t=2909 and enjoy! O. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [IGF 2021] Subject: Experience IGF Music Night! Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 18:29:29 +0000 From: IGF 2021 Participants <igf2021participants(a)intgovforum.org> Reply-To: igf2021participants(a)intgovforum.org To: igf2021participants(a)intgovforum.org <igf2021participants(a)intgovforum.org> Dear IGF 2021 Participants, Whether you’re here with us in Katowice, or you’ve been following the IGF online, you can experience the IGF’s legendary Music Night. Listen to talented members of the IGF Community show off their musical skills with a series of performances this evening (19.00-21.00 CET/18.00-20.00 UTC). Here’s How: 1. Navigate to igf2021.collectivibe.com 2. Go to Auditorium 3. Go to Concert Hall Do not hesitate to take this opportunity to network with colleagues by entering thorough the gate labeled “IGF 2021”. Enjoy! Best regards, IGF Secretariat

4 3

IGF 2021 WS #13 Digital transformation challenges in developing countries
by Matthias M. Hudobnik Dec. 7, 2021

Dec. 7, 2021

My dear At-Large Community, I want to warmly invite you to the following IGF session ;): Title: IGF 2021 WS #13 Digital transformation challenges in developing countries Date/Time: Wednesday, 8th December, 2021 (15:05 CET) - (16:35 CET) Speakers: Speaker 1: Vint Cerf, Private Sector, Western European and Others Group (WEOG) Speaker 2: Antonio Garcia Zaballos, Intergovernmental Organization, Latin American and Caribbean Group (GRULAC) Speaker 3: Ndeye Maimouna DIOP, Civil Society, African Group Speaker 4: Gitanjali Sah, Intergovernmental Organization, Intergovernmental Organization Speaker 5: Matthias Hudobnik, Civil Society, Western European and Others Group (WEOG) Moderator: Olga Cavalli, Civil Society, Latin American and Caribbean Group (GRULAC) Online Moderator: Patricia Vargas, Technical Community, Latin American and Caribbean Group (GRULAC) Rapporteur: Mónica María Trochez Arboleda, Private Sector, Latin American and Caribbean Group (GRULAC) Meeting room: Conference Room 3 Link: https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-ws-13-digital-transformatio… Have a nice day! Best, Matthias ________________________________ Ing. Mag. Matthias M. Hudobnik FIP • CIPP/E • CIPT • DPO • CIS LA matthias(a)hudobnik.at http://www.hudobnik.at @mhudobnik

1 0