- Bc-gnso - lists.icann.org

FILED: BC Comment on Continuous Improvement Program Framework
by Segunfunmi Olajide 17 Jan '25

17 Jan '25

On 17th January 2025, the Business Constituency (BC) filed a comment on Continuous Improvement Program Framework. Please find the attached copy for your reference. Thanks to Arinola and Johnny for drafting, with input from Mason, Vivek, Lawrence, Tim, and Rachael *Segunfunmi Olajide* *CEO & Policy Expert | **Heritech Consulting <https://heritechconsulting.org/>* *Vice Chair for Policy Coordination | ICANN Business Constituency <https://www.icannbc.org/>*

1 0

FILED: BC response to European Commission Survey on Internet Governance
by Segunfunmi Olajide 14 Jan '25

14 Jan '25

On 14th January 2025, the Business Constituency (BC) filed a response to the European Commission's survey on internet governance. Please find the attached copy of the response. Thanks to Mason, Tim, and Alan for your valuable contributions and input in putting the BC response together. *Segunfunmi Olajide* *CEO & Policy Expert | **Heritech Consulting <https://heritechconsulting.org/>* *Vice Chair for Policy Coordination | ICANN Business Constituency <https://www.icannbc.org/>*

1 0

FILED: BC comment on proposed changes to anti-harassment policy
by Steve DelBianco 20 Dec '24

20 Dec '24

Thanks to drafting by Marie, Tim, and Mason, we filed the attached BC comment today. In the online summary, we highlighted these 3 points from our comment: Amendments to the Anti-Harassment Policy must not overlap with, or contradict, the Expected Standards of Behavior. While the latter governs behavior, the former should govern procedure. The BC strongly agrees that all members of this professional community must act in accordance with these Standards. ICANN is a professional environment, where all should feel welcome and safe. By the same token, rumor and unfounded allegations can have extremely serious effects on any individual’s ability to perform their job and maintain their professional reputation. To help inform this current consultation, BC is also interested to know how well the current policy has worked, and whether community members feel comfortable bringing their claims forward. Data on these points would be valuable as updates to policy are considered. -- Steve DelBianco ICANN BC vice chair for poolicy coordination

1 0

FILED: BC comment on ICANN Code of Conduct on SOIs
by Steve DelBianco 02 Dec '24

02 Dec '24

Today the BC filed the attached comment on the ICANN Community Participant Code of Conduct on SOIs and General Ethics Policy. See it online here<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/icann-community-particip…>. Thanks to Bartlett, Lawrence, Segunfunmi, and Arinola for drafting. -- Steve DelBianco Vice Chair for Policy Coordination +1.703.615.6206

1 0

FILED: BC comment on Initial Report on Transfer Policy Review
by Steve DelBianco 30 Sep '24

30 Sep '24

Today the BC filed the attached comment on the Initial Report on the Transfer Policy Review<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/initial-report-on-the-tr…> Thanks to Zak and Arinola for representing the BC on this working group, and for others who helped Zak to draft this comment: Lawrence, Tess Diaz, Sven Echternach, and Rachel Shitanda.

1 0

ICANN Registration Data Request System (RDRS) report for Aug-2024
by Steve DelBianco 23 Sep '24

23 Sep '24

BC members – the August report for RDRS is posted here<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rdrs-usage-metrics-16sep24-en.p…>. Below is a key graph of disclosure requests, which Org is using to gauge demand from our community. Requests are trending down, as you can see. [cid:image001.png@01DB0DBF.1439AB80] -- Steve DelBianco President & CEO NetChoice<https://netchoice.org/> +1.703.615.6206

1 0

FILED: BC moment on ICANN Strategic Plan and Operating Plan Framework for FY26-30
by Steve DelBianco 17 Sep '24

17 Sep '24

Here<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/draft-icann-strategic-pl…> and attached is the BC comment on the Draft ICANN Strategic Plan and Operating Plan Framework for FY26-30<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/draft-icann-strategic-pl…> Thanks again to drafters Tim Smith, Segunfunmi Olajide, David Snead, and Jimson Olufuye

1 0

FILED: BC support for Fundamental Bylaws Amendments Related to Grant Program
by Steve DelBianco 15 Sep '24

15 Sep '24

As discussed during our last two BC meetings, the BC filed today in SUPPORT of ICANN Org’s Proposed Fundamental Bylaws Amendments Related to Grant Program<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/proposed-fundamental-byl…> As described by ICANN Org: The updated proposal incorporates specific language into both the Reconsideration (Article 4, Section 4.2) and Independent Review Process (Article 4, Section 4.3) sections of the ICANN Bylaws, but does not otherwise add to or modify the Bylaws governing either Accountability Mechanism. The language added within each section sets out an exclusion that the relevant Accountability Mechanism shall not be used for claims or disputes “relating to decisions to approve or not approve an application to the ICANN Grant Program.” This Bylaws amendment is offered as a way to fully implement part of the Cross-Community Working Group on New gTLD Auction Proceeds (CCWG-AP) Final Report, which recommended that ICANN’s Accountability Mechanisms should not be used to challenge decisions on grant applications. That recommendation, often referred to as “Recommendation 7,” can only be fully implemented if the Bylaws that define each Accountability Mechanism are amended. -- Steve DelBianco Vice chair for policy coordinaation ICANN Business Constituency

1 0

FILED: BC comment on Data Processing Specification
by Steve DelBianco 09 Sep '24

09 Sep '24

Today we filed the attached BC comment on the Data Processing Specification for ICANN-Accredited Registries and Registrars<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/data-processing-specific…>. Thanks to Segunfunmi Olajide, Margie Milam, and Steve Crocker for working on the draft.

2 1

FILED: BC comment on Han script IDN TLDs
by Steve DelBianco 16 Aug '24

16 Aug '24

Today the BC filed<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/seeking-input-on-han-scr…> its comment on Han Script Single Character IDN Generic Top-Level Domains. Thanks again to Ching Ciao and Asteway Negash for drafting. Here is the summary paragraph I posted, drawing from the comment: In our Mar-2024 comment on this topic, the BC said that "cross-community consultation should help evaluate whether the current objection process is sufficient." We still believe ICANN Org should seek community consultation on this issue. At the very least, ICANN Org should arrange for the CJK GPs to sit together and develop a prohibitive list and/or reach consensus regarding strings that may be confused with geographic names. At this point, we ask ICANN Org why it seeks further community comment, since Org now says that “no further analysis is required”. The BC does not believe the string similarity review or the community objection process are sufficient in confusions related to geographic names. The BC also believes that SSAC’s SAC052 advisory from 2012 might be overcome by events, and SSAC should be asked for updated advice regarding single-character IDNs. On 8/14/24, 9:05 AM, "Steve DelBianco" <sdelbianco(a)netchoice.org> wrote: This is LAST CALL for review of our draft Draft is here<on%20Han%20Script%20Single%20Character%20IDN%20Generic%20Top-Level%20Domains> and attached. Please reply with any questions or edits before 16-Aug. Thanks again to Ching Ciao and Asteway Negash for drafting. --Steve On 8/5/24, 6:48 PM, "Steve DelBianco" <sdelbianco(a)netchoice.org> wrote: BC members: Just want to give members lots of time to review for our draft comment on Han Script Single Character IDN Generic Top-Level Domains (link<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/seeking-input-on-han-scr…>). Comments close 16-Aug. We can discuss on our 8-Aug BC call as well. Thanks to Ching Chiao and Astaway Negash for drafting the BC comment (here<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-EZHamXQFoOZYer7_VjSzstbhgvY-6AcKueGLSI…> and attached) The GNSO Final Report on the new gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/final-rep…>, Rec 25.4 stated that single character gTLDs may be allowed for a character in ideograph (or ideogram) script. The GNSO’s Phase 1 Final Report on the Internationalized Domain Names Expedited Policy Development Process<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2023/correspondence/epdp-…> (IDN EPDP Phase 1) further stated: “...the only script that meets the criteria is the Han script, which is used in the Chinese, Japanese, and Korean languages. Nevertheless, applications for single-character gTLDs that are ideographs must not be accepted until relevant guidelines from the Chinese, Japanese, and Korean Generation Panels are developed, finalized after Public Comment, and implemented in the New gTLD Program. In the event that the Generation Panels determine such additional guidelines beyond the analysis already provided in the RZ-LGR unnecessary, applications for single-character gTLDs in the Han script shall be accepted.” Thanks again to Ching and Asteway from drafting

1 0