- APAC-Discuss - lists.icann.org

Update on ALAC Vote on Dot Health Applications
by Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro March 15, 2013

March 15, 2013

Dear All, To all the At Large Structures within APRALO and the Pacific Health Practitioners Community. Greetings from Fiji! As you know the At Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) recently votes on the various Applications for Dot Health on whether the ALAC should object or not. I am enclosing a summary of all the votes as per the announcement. The voting was "Anonymous" but in the interest of transparency, I wanted to advise you that I voted *"YES" *on all these votes. I would also like to thank the New gTLD Review Working Group chaired by Dev Anand Teelucksingh who did a fantastic job of consolidating the response from the various stakeholders and the Applicants which allowed the ALAC to be informed of the concerns of the community as well as those discussions that were taking place on the listserv and beyond. I would also like to state for the record that I had also consulted Pacific Medical Practitioners on the IG4Health Listserv and sought clarification on a few issues from the World Health Organisation before taking to the poll. This was not an easy decision to make and I also noted the legitimate points that one of the members of the Review Working Group Garth Bruen had made on other names such as "Medical". This was not put to the ALAC but note that the Independent Objector has identified these. Kindly find the consolidated summary of how the Vote went. Following the ALAC Voting Results, the ALAC Chair, Dr Oliver Crepin - Leblond filed Objections on behalf of the ALAC on the three Applications. *ALAC Vote on DotHealth LLC’s Application* With 14 out of 15 ALAC Members having voted on the gTLD Objection: Applicant "DotHealth, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string< https://community.icann.org/x/t4xwAg> we can confirm that the result is quorate. ***** Question: Do you support the filing of an objection by the ALAC for the Applicant "DotHealth, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string< https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40930487>? gTLD Objection: Applicant "DotHealth, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string? As at Poll close: Tuesday 12 March 2013 23:59 UTC Number of voters: 14 · Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 93.33 Ranked by votes Rank Options Votes % 1 Yes 8 57.14 2 No 3 21.43 2 Abstain 3 21.43 You may review the results independently under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=2966bba6wrqzF9hjVtrmi2Jy All closed ALAC votes may be reviewed under: https://www.bigpulse.com/m7097 *ALAC Vote on Afilias Limited’s Application * With 14 out of 15 ALAC Members having voted on the gTLD Objection: Applicant "Afilias Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string< https://community.icann.org/x/y4xwAg> we can confirm that the result is quorate. ***** Question: Do you support the filing of an objection by the ALAC for the Applicant "Afilias Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string< https://community.icann.org/x/y4xwAg>? gTLD Objection: Applicant "Afilias Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string As at Poll close: Tuesday 12 March 2013 23:59 UTC Number of voters: 14 · Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 93.33 Ranked by votes Rank Options Votes % 1 Yes 7 50.00 2 No 4 28.57 3 Abstain 3 21.43 ***** You may review the results independently under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=2967b6TVGCAKpHnyGELsbzv7 All closed ALAC votes may be reviewed under: https://www.bigpulse.com/m7097 *ALAC’s vote on Dot Health Limited’s Application* With 14 out of 15 ALAC Members having voted on the gTLD Objection: < https://community.icann.org/x/xYxwAg> <https://community.icann.org/x/xYxwAg> Applicant "dot Health Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string< https://community.icann.org/x/xYxwAg> we can confirm that the result is quorate. ***** Question: Do you support the filing of an objection by the ALAC for the Applicant "dot Health Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string< https://community.icann.org/x/xYxwAg>? gTLD Objection: Applicant "dot Health Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string As at Poll close: Tuesday 12 March 2013 23:59 UTC Number of voters: 14 · Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 93.33 Ranked by votes Rank Options Votes % 1 Yes 10 71.43 2 Abstain 3 21.43 3 No 1 7.14 ***** You may review the results independently under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=2964IezYSWT6wsXi5X3RzbVv All closed ALAC votes may be reviewed under: https://www.bigpulse.com/m7097 *ALAC’s Vote on Goose Fest LLC’s Application* With 14 out of 15 ALAC Members having voted on the gTLD Objection: Applicant "Goose Fest, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string< https://community.icann.org/x/v4xwAg> we can confirm that the result is quorate. ***** Question: Do you support the filing of an objection by the ALAC for the Applicant "Goose Fest, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string< https://community.icann.org/x/v4xwAg>? ? gTLD Objection: Applicant "Goose Fest, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string As at Poll close: Tuesday 12 March 2013 23:59 UTC Number of voters: 14 · Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 93.33 Ranked by votes Rank Options Votes % 1 Yes 10 71.43 2 Abstain 3 21.43 3 No 1 7.14 ***** You may review the results independently under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=29653hTA3dWjzFzqyAMk6w7p All closed ALAC votes may be reviewed under: https://www.bigpulse.com/m7097 Yours faithfully, -- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala P.O. Box 17862 Suva Fiji Twitter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Tel: +679 3544828 Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851 Blog: salanieta.blogspot.com

1 0

Meeting Invitation / ALAC Briefing Session on the RAA - Monday 18 March 2013
by At-Large Staff March 14, 2013

March 14, 2013

Dear All, As a means to develop an ALAC policy advice statement on the recently opened Public Comment on the Proposed 2013 RAA (see At-Large Proposed 2013 RAA Posted for Comment Workspace at: https://community.icann.org/x/xZRwAg) Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has requested an At-Large Briefing Session on this topic. This Briefing Session is scheduled for Monday, 18 March at 16:30 UTC (see other times at: http://tinyurl.com/atho2yk ). The agenda page, including dial in information, is available at: https://community.icann.org/x/N5dwAg. Guest speakers include Margie Milam, Senior Director, Strategic Initiatives at ICANN; Samantha Eisner, Senior Counsel at ICANN; and Alan Greenberg, ALAC Member from NARALO and ALAC Liaison to the GNSO. There will be a question and answer session as well as information on the schedule for the development of the ALAC policy advice statement. FR and ES interpretation will be provided upon the receipt by At-Large staff of 3 requests or more for each language (please confirm to STAFF as soon as possible) Kind regards, Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org One World, One Internet

2 2

Re: [APAC-Discuss] IMPORTANT FY14 AC Budget Request Information and Deadlines
by Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond March 14, 2013

March 14, 2013

Dear All, I am following-up on the message below to remind you of the deadline for FY14 requests from RALOs which is Monday 18 March 2013. When completing your templates, please remember to include deliverables and the rationale why ICANN should fund the activity. (and please make sure you show how the proposal ties up with the ICANN strategy) General Assemblies (GAs) As you know, the ALAC is going to submit a proposal for a second At-Large Summit (ATLAS2) to take place in FY14. The At-Large Summit would include a General Assembly for each of the RALOs. At this point in time, it is therefore redundant for RALOs to ask for a General Assembly this Financial Year. Internet Governance Forum (IGF) workshops Requests for workshops at the IGF will be dependent on the workshops being accepted by the MAG/IGF so make sure that you submit the requests for workshops in time for the IGF schedule, which shows a deadline for the preliminary call for workshop proposals on 22 March 2013. ExCom meeting Due to the shortening of the ICANN meeting week with the Board meeting now on Thursday, the ALAC will be submitting a request to support the ExCom and Liaisons for an extra night at the end of the ICANN Meetings in FY14 (Friday night) so that they may discuss follow-up items and plan strategy for the time between meetings, as it has customarily done on Friday afternoons when the Board meeting was on Friday morning. Finally, the At-Large Finance & Budget Sub-Committee will be holding a call to review *all* requests (and not only the Fast Track ones) on 20 March 2013. Kind regards, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond Chair of the FBSC On 07/03/2013 16:53, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > As requested on the Finance and Budget Sub-Committee (FBSC)/RALO > Leaders Call of Thursday, 28 February, please find the links to the > key documents for the FY14 AC/SO budget request process: > > > > · *At Large - FY14 Special Budget Request > <https://community.icann.org/display/projfinadhocws/At+Large+-+FY14+Special+…> > - Finance Department's Workspace for At-Large (includes FY14 AC budget > request template)* > > · *At-Large FY14 Budget Development Workspace > <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+FY14+Budget+Developmen…>* > > · *FY14 SO-AC-SG Budget Processv1.xlsx > <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/40174679/FY14+SO-AC-SG+Bud…>* > > · *FY14 Budget Process - Community Call - 17 Jan.pdf > <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/40174679/FY14+Budget+Proce…>* > > · *FY14 Special Budget Request Guidelines.docx > <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/40174679/FY14+Special+Budg…>* > > · *Template - SO-AC-SG FY14 Budget Request.docx > <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/40174679/Template+-+SO-AC-…>* > > · *Community Additional Budget Request Criteria Matrix.xlsx > <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/40174679/Community+Additio…>* > > > > *Instructions for submitting AC FY14 requests: * > > 1. Send your completed At-Large FY14 AC budget request template > to Olivier Crepin-Leblond (ocl(a)gih.com <mailto:ocl@gih.com>) and > At-Large staff ( staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>) *by 18 March 2013.* > > *2. *At-Large staff will post the completed At-Large FY14 AC > budget request templates to the *At-Large FY14 Budget Development > Workspace > <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+FY14+Budget+Developmen…>* > > 3. The FBSC will review the completed At-Large FY14 AC budget > request templates during a call on 20 March 2013. > > 4. The FBSC will direct staff to submit the At-Large FY14 AC > budget requests for review by the ICANN Controller. > > 5. ICANN finance staff will confirm and validate your submission > by reviewing and posting your request in the dedicated wiki workspace > within 48 hours of its submission > > * * > > *Deadlines for the of FY14 budget request templates:* > > > > * *Deadline for RALOs to submit all FY14 AC requests to Olivier and > At-Large staff => 18 March 2013* > * *Early vote/decision by April => At-Large to submit to ICANN > Controller by 22 March 2013 **(please note that the early > vote/decision process is for budget requests with activities in > the first month of FY 14 (i.e., July 2013)* > * *Vote/decision by June => At-Large submit to ICANN Controller by > 29 April 2013* > > > > Please let At-Large staff know if you have any questions related to > the FY14 AC Budget Request process. > > > > Regards, > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > Peregrine, and Julia Charvolen > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of the ALAC > > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > > > > > > >

1 0

Draft ALAC Rules of Procedure & Upcoming Teleconference Review Meeting
by Heidi Ullrich March 12, 2013

March 12, 2013

On behalf of Olivier Crepin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, and Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Chair of the At-Large Rules of Procedure Working Group, please see the important note below regarding an upcoming ALAC Meeting to review the revised ALAC Rules of Procedure (RoPs): ** Dear All, As per a previous discussion and agreement of the ALAC on 22 January 2013, the ALAC will be holding a single purpose teleconference call to discuss the proposed version of their NEW Rules of Procedure (RoPs) before a Call to Vote to Ratify and Adopt these (or not) which is to be conducted online and prior to the 46th ICANN Meeting to be held in Beijing 7-11 April 2013. This special meeting of the ALAC, which is open to all members of the At-Large Community, especially RALO Leadership and ALS members, is now announced. This call will be held on Tuesday, 19 March 2013 at 2100 UTC (2100 UTC =1400 PDT, 1700 EDT, 2200 CET, 5am Hong Kong (+1 Day) and 8am Sydney (+1 Day). The Wiki page for this meeting is found at https://community.icann.org/x/WpVwAg. FR and ES interpretation has been confirmed for this meeting. All Members of the ALAC and members of the At-Large Community are requested to RSVP their attendance at this call to At-Large Staff (staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>) indicating if they will be joining one of the interpreted channels. The 15 Members of the ALAC are encouraged to place any comments they have in the COMMENTS section of the meeting page (see: https://community.icann.org/x/WpVwAg) or e-mail to the ALAC Working List ( alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org>), particularly if they will not be able to attend this meeting. Members of the At-Large Community who wish to have any input or comments on these proposed new RoPs considered at this meeting should send these contributions to one of the ALAC Members from their Region or via email to the Chair of the Rules of Procedure Working Group, Cheryl Langdon-Orr (langdonorr(a)gmail.com<mailto:langdonorr@gmail.com>). Background on these proposed new ALAC RoPs and opportunity for final ALAC review: This final version of the new ALAC RoP (see: https://community.icann.org/x/VoYi and attached) is the product of an extensive process carried out by some 33 members of the At-Large Community (ALAC Members, formal Regional representatives as well as individual ALS and RALO members of the At-Large Community who volunteered to the ALAC Metrics and RoP Review WG(s). These volunteers have, in face-to-face and teleconference meetings of the Working Group (WG) as a whole and of the new Rules section Drafting Teams (DTs), committed well over 500 person-hours in review of the current RoPs and support material including previous versions, discussion of all rules merits, and in drafting of and editing this new Rules proposed text. A summary of who participated in the various RoP meetings can be found at: https://community.icann.org/x/SgoQAg. In addition, and unfortunately difficult to measure and capture, is an extraordinary amount of time spent by the WG's Drafting Teams (DTs) leadership and section pen-holders (noting each DT was in itself, like the RoP Review WG as a whole, a deliberately regionally balanced group) and even more hours and effort again contributed by several current and previously serving ALAC Members during the final stages of integration and editing of the version you are presented with here. The majority of the ALAC has been directly involved with the Rules of Procedure WG and DTs' activities and in several cases served as Leads and/or Pen-Holders for the discussion and drafting, and therefore it is unexpected and doubtful that any significant or substantial omissions or edits will be proposed for discussion either at or before the conference call. Also it is recognised that the ALAC has at its regular meetings been continually appraised of the progress of this Rules Review and also that all business of the Review WG/DTs has been done in an open and transparent manner with archives and records being held and publicly available on the relevant ALAC wiki pages. It must also be noted by the ALAC as a whole and by the wider At-Large Community in general, that virtually every concept and issue relating to these proposed new ALAC RoPs was discussed extensively, prior to any drafting, and often reviewed line by line, mostly over several visits / revisits at several meetings. Anything that was even slightly controversial or where people had differing views was debated and in virtually all cases, what has ended up in these Rules has a strong consensus of those working on the original drafting team and the final reviewers. It is also important to note that several of the 'Adjunct Documents' referred to in these new Rules are not as yet completely finalised nor have they been reviewed (as such) by the ALAC. However, they are all to be drawn from existing ALAC policy and practices and will be shortly available. The vote for the adoption of these new ALAC RoPs does not need to be delayed until they are prepared and circulated, but rather the new RoPs will not come into effect until those Adjunct Documents are all approved by the ALAC. Specific details on the ALAC vote plans and procedures relating to these new ALAC Rules will be discussed during this special ALAC meeting on 19 March 2013, but it is our hope that the vote can commence shortly after the ALAC monthly call on 26 March 2013. Regards, Cheryl Langdon-Orr and Olivier Crepin-Leblond 11 March 2013 ** Kind Regards, Heidi Heidi Ullrich Director for At-Large Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: + 1 (310) 578 - 8647 Fax: +1 (310) 823 - 8649 Cell/Mobile: +1 (310) 437 - 3956

3 2

Material for review by the ALAC regarding objection statements to 4 new gTLD applications
by Dev Anand Teelucksingh March 8, 2013

March 8, 2013

Dear All, Here is a summary of the information available for review by the ALAC regarding the RALO advice on the objection statements on community grounds to 4 new gTLD applications. Many of this information were linked on the Friday March 8 2013 ALAC's call (https://community.icann.org/x/8JNwAg) but are repeated here for reference. All of the wiki pages with the objection statements against : - applicant "DotHealth, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string (https://community.icann.org/x/t4xwAg) - applicant "Goose Fest, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string (https://community.icann.org/x/v4xwAg) - applicant "dot Health Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string (https://community.icann.org/x/xYxwAg) - applicant "Afilias Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string (https://community.icann.org/x/y4xwAg) have been updated with - links to applicants' Public Interest Commitments (PICs) - correspondence received by the gTLD Review Group over the past 48 hours, including * letters from individual applicants, * letters of support for objections from organisations and emails from the WHO clarifying issues raised on the NARALO list. With many of the correspondence received (even today), directed at the objection statement against Stable Tone Limited" for the "健康" string, the wiki page at https://community.icann.org/x/0YxwAg was also updated, for reference, even though this is no longer under ALAC's consideration, as per RALO advice. Also, there was discussion by the RALOs on the applicants and the objection statements and can be reviewed on the RALO mailing list archives: NARALO: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/na-discuss/2013-March/thread.html APRALO: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/apac-discuss/2013/thread.html LACRALO: https://community.icann.org/x/Q5FwAg (wiki page) gTLD Review Group List archives : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/newgtldrg/ (for reference, but again all correspondence regarding the applications and objection statements have been posted on the individual wiki pages) Also, the objection statements are on community objection grounds. The community objection grounds page at https://community.icann.org/x/QgkQAg lists the 4 tests as specified in the Applicant GuideBook that the objection statement must meet for the objection to prevail. Also for useful reading on community objection grounds: Circle ID article: "Thinking Carefully About New gTLD Objections: Community (3 of 4)" http://www.circleid.com/posts/20130219_thinking_carefully_about_new_gtld_ob… Independent Objector's (IO) comments on controversial applications: http://www.independent-objector-newgtlds.org/english-version/the-independen… The IO comments shows the reasoning behind his decisions as to whether to file objections on community or limited public interest concerns. Kind Regards, Dev Anand Teelucksingh gTLD RG chair

1 0

Material for review by the ALAC regarding objection statements to 4 new gTLD applications
by Dev Anand Teelucksingh March 8, 2013

March 8, 2013

Dear All, Just a summary of the information available for review by the ALAC regarding the RALO advice on the objection statements on community grounds to 4 new gTLD applications. All of the wiki pages with the objection statements against : - applicant "DotHealth, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string (https://community.icann.org/x/t4xwAg) - applicant "Goose Fest, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string (https://community.icann.org/x/v4xwAg) - applicant "dot Health Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string (https://community.icann.org/x/xYxwAg) - applicant "Afilias Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string (https://community.icann.org/x/y4xwAg) have been updated with - links to applicants' Public Interest Commitments (PICs) - correspondence received by the gTLD RG (http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/newgtldrg/) over the past 48 hours, including * letters from individual applicants, * letters of support for objections from organisations and emails from the WHO clarifying issues raised on the NARALO list With many of the correspondence received (even today), directed at the objection statement against Stable Tone Limited" for the "健康" string, the wiki page at https://community.icann.org/x/0YxwAg was also updated, for reference. Also, there was discussion by the RALOs on the applicants and the objection statements and can be reviewed on the RALO mailing list archives: NARALO : http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/na-discuss/2013-March/thread.html APRALO : http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/apac-discuss/2013/thread.html LACRALO : https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40931651 (wiki page) Kind Regards, Dev Anand Teelucksingh gTLD RG chair

1 0

CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Beijing Communications Department Questions
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 7, 2013

March 7, 2013

Dear All, The At-Large Beijing Communications Department Questions Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/e4U3Ag> has been created. Please note that this workspace will be used to gather the At-Large's questions for the Communications Department during the Beijing Meeting. Please submit any comments on the workspace using the comments function by 15 Mar at 23:59 UTC. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Beijing Global Stakeholder Engagement Questions
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 7, 2013

March 7, 2013

Dear All, The At-Large Beijing Global Stakeholder Engagement Questions Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/eYU3Ag> has been created. Please note that this workspace will be used to gather the At-Large's questions for the Global Partnerships Department during the Beijing Meeting. Please submit any comments on the workspace using the comments function by 15 Mar at 23:59 UTC. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Beijing ICANN Board Questions
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 7, 2013

March 7, 2013

Dear All, The At-Large Beijing ICANN Board Questions Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/d4U3Ag> has been created. Please note that this workspace will be used to gather the At-Large's questions for the ICANN Board during the Beijing Meeting. Please submit any comments on the workspace using the comments function by 15 Mar at 23:59 UTC. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Beijing GAC Questions
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 7, 2013

March 7, 2013

Dear All, The At-Large Beijing GAC Questions Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/doU3Ag> has been created. Please note that this workspace will be used to gather the At-Large's questions for the GAC during the Beijing Meeting. Please submit any comments on the workspace using the comments function by 15 Mar at 23:59 UTC. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0