- APAC-Discuss - lists.icann.org

Open Call for Participation in the Task Force on Arabic Script IDNs
by Rinalia Abdul Rahim Aug. 6, 2013

Aug. 6, 2013

Dear Colleagues, Please find attached an Open Call for Participation in the Task Force on Arabic Script IDNs. The Task Force is an initiative of the Middle East Strategy Working Group (MESWG). Those interested are encouraged to apply especially if your community uses the Arabic script. Best regards, Rinalia *Extract from the attachment (please view the document for more information) * The Task Force will focus on technical issues and solutions related to Arabic script IDNs to promote Arabic IDNs definition, secure deployment and ease of use for the community. *Scope of Work * • Arabic Script Label Generation Ruleset (LGR) for the Root Zone • Second level LGRs for the Arabic script • Arabic script Internationalized Registration Data Protocol and Practice • Universal acceptability of Arabic script IDNs and variants • Technical challenges around registration of Arabic IDNs and variants • Operational software for Arabic script IDN registry and registrar operations • DNS security matters specifically related to Arabic IDNs and variants • Technical training material around Arabic script IDNs *Task Force Membership* The task force will consist of a diverse set of interested individuals from a diverse set of interests, e.g. Registries, Registrars, Community, Academia, DNS experts, IDNA experts, Unicode, Law enforcement, DNS security, Policy makers, etc. All the materials prepared through the task force will be openly available for use by the community. *Interested individuals are invited to join the task force on voluntary basis by emailing their CV and Statement of Interest (SOI) to tf-aidn-admin(a)meswg.org, which will be publicly archived for information purposes, and then signing up at http://lists.meswg.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-aidn.* *Initial Timelines* 5th August, 2013: Open Call for Task Force Members 20th August, 2013: MESWG to announce Task Force of Arabic Script IDNs (TF-AIDN) 1st Sept, 2013: Initiate Work Item(s) END

1 0

APRALO and APNIC - what do you want?
by Holly Raiche July 30, 2013

July 30, 2013

Hi Everyone Just to follow up on a relationship (and maybe MoU) with APNIC. Before I get back to APNIC, please everyone, have a look at the APNIC site (APNIC.net) The offer lots of training on a range of numbering issues, including one hour online sessions on a range of Internet issues and longer 2 or 3 day workshops throughout the region. They also participate and/or hold many conferences. And maybe we can see speaking slots in their conferences I imagine what we would want to ask for (at the least) is updates on their training activities - particularly in the various APNIC region. We may also want free or reduced cost participation in the longer training courses and possible reduced or free access to their conferences - and maybe free access to some of their materials in their library. (I am not sure how much it all costs, but that could be worked through). I am sure there are a variety of needs in each ALS. So the first step is everyone having a look at their site and see what they offer that would be of particular interest to your ALS. With that information, I can get back to APNIC and start discussions on closer cooperation Thanks HOlly

4 3

ICANN proposed EWG - APRALO views?
by Holly Raiche July 30, 2013

July 30, 2013

Hi Everyone Those of you who were in Durban would have heard the presentation Carlton and I did on the Initial report of the Expert Working Group on what is called an Aggregated Registrants Data Service. (ARDS). Essentially, the idea would be to have a repository of Whois data. It is the repository that holds unauthorised data, verifies the data and then provides access to that data - on a 'gated' basis (members of the public have access to limited data, registered users have access to more data that is relevant to the use they will have for that data). The steps are: •Registrar collects registrant data – gTLD registry. gTLD registries hold authoritative data •ARDS (or other repository) as non-authoritative repository of all all collected data elements •Requestors apply for access to data – obtain access to non-authoritative, or special cases, authoritative data •ARDS repository provides validation of data, handling and auditing access, handling complaints and imposing penalties for inappropriate access At this stage, the ARDS suggestion is at the concept state. The Expert Working Group is seeking feedback of what people think of the idea - of whether to proceed with development of a more detailed proposal - with feedback due by mid August. (For the full proposal, go to the ICANN site and put EWG report in the search function). Carlton, EVan, Rinalia and I spent some time after the presentation discussing what we thought of the proposal - in light of two things: the fact that the RAA and related documents have just been passed by the Board and have not been given time to see if they will improve issues like access to Whois, and the accuracy of Whois data while embedding privacy protections. After that discussion, I made some dot point notes on what I think we were all saying. Concerns ALAC has had with the RAA, and in particular, Whois Accuracy (reflected in final WHois Report) - inaccuracy of Whois data - aligned with it, unenforceable requirements on registrars - complete failure of compliance - abuse of privacy/proxy - lack of accreditation process for privacy/proxy service Changes to the RAA and accompanying documents - Applaud many of the changes including - Stronger obligations on registrars for verification - Stronger accuracy requirements - Stronger language for enforcement - At least a skeleton framework for privacy/proxy services – noting lack of details - Concerns with June changes and related issues - With compliance – will have an even bigger task – many new gTLDs, new metrics etc so resources already stretched - Don’t know outcome of audit – and what action will be taken - Still a requirement for open access for all Whois data – unless is hidden behind a privacy/proxy service – so doesn’t recognise graduated needs to Whois data - Still some concerns with RAA language Response to EWG proposal - RAA changes haven’t been given a chance to work – BUT - It addresses many issues - Compliance – right now little if any faith in current department but concerns if moved – power to enforce? Resources to enforce - Does allow gated access to data - Would provide mechanism for protection of privacy – recognising the outstanding issues of who can be protected, for what, and who has access - In general – welcome the concept and welcome that it potentially addresses issues – but are concerns (as above) So please - Carlton and I would appreciate any feedback on the proposal. Is it worth proceeding with development of the concept? Holly

3 3

Re: [APAC-Discuss] [ALAC-Announce] ICANN News Alert -- ICANN Strategy Panels Launched
by Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond July 26, 2013

July 26, 2013

Dear all, just a reminder of the announcement below -- with the deadline for sending your resume/CV to the email addresses affiliated with each of the specialty areas by 29 July 2013. This gives you the week-end to send your resume out. Kind regards, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond ALAC Chair On 15/07/2013 16:41, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > > [http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> > News Alert > > http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-15jul13-en.htm > > ________________________________ > ICANN Strategy Panels Launched > > Strategy Panels Unveiled at ICANN 47 in Durban > > 15 July 2013 > > During today's opening ceremony of ICANN 47 in Durban, South Africa, President and CEO Fadi Chehadé announced the creation of five new ICANN Strategy Panels that will serve as an integral part of a framework for cross-community dialogue on strategic matters. The ICANN Strategy Panels will convene subject matter experts, thought leaders and industry practitioners to support development of ICANN's strategic and operational plans, in coordination with many other global players, and will be comprised of up to seven members including the chair for an anticipated one-year timeframe. > > Designed to conduct work in critical strategic areas identified by the community, Board and staff, the ICANN Strategy Panels will build on public input being generated to inform a new, overarching vision and five-year strategic plan, and subsequent operating plan, for the organization. Advisory in nature, the ICANN Strategy Panels will report to Chehadé; will operate in a manner consistent with ICANN's commitment to transparency and accountability; and will channel all views, guidance and advice produced into the standard community and Board processes that guide ICANN's activities. > > In its fourteen-year history, ICANN has grown to reflect a changing landscape of continued innovation, interconnectedness, and unprecedented growth in the DNS ecosystem, one that transcends groups and borders to serve the public interest. Yet, the Internet is at a critical inflection point as billions of new people are expected to join the global network in the next few years and as the nature of its usage matures dramatically. With this in mind, the ICANN Strategy Panels are expected to help catalyze transformation and advance ICANN's role in the context of a dynamic, increasingly complex global environment. > > Schedules and Operations > > The ICANN Strategy Panels will conduct their activities, starting in September 2013, primarily online and through conference calls, although face-to-face meetings are expected to take place according to the needs of each panel. The ICANN Strategy Panels will also provide public updates on their progress that will be linked to ICANN's overall strategic and operational planning activities. Dedicated ICANN executive liaisons have been assigned to and will support each of the ICANN Strategy Panels throughout the process. > > Members and Objectives > > The ICANN Strategy Panels will focus specifically on identifier technology innovation; ICANN's role in the Internet organizations' ecosystem; ICANN multistakeholder innovation; the public responsibility framework; and the role of ICANN in the future of Internet governance. Chairs who will lead the panels in their respective concentrations and who will guide the panels in their groundbreaking efforts have been identified; however, qualified individuals interested in serving as committee members are still being sought. Potential panel members need not originate directly from ICANN structures, but should have a deep understanding of and concern for the work being undertaken by ICANN, and an ability to think strategically, globally, and creatively about the challenges inherent in the ICANN Strategy Panels' mandate. Interested individuals should send their resume/CV to the email addresses affiliated with each of the specialty areas by 29 July 2013. Members will be selected by ICANN's President & CEO, in coordination with each ICANN Strategy Panel Chair. > > ________________________________ > Strategy Panel on Identifier Technology Innovation > > Chair: Paul V. Mockapetris<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/bios#paul-mocka…> > > [http://www.icann.org/sites/default/files/styles/bio_photo/public/mockapetri…]<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/bios#paul-mocka…> > > Contact: itipanel(a)icann.org<mailto:itipanel@icann.org> > > Key Deliverables: > > * Engage with the ICANN community and public on technology matters; > * Develop a technology roadmap for DNS and other identifiers; and > * Provide a technology roadmap for ICANN technical and security operations, including best practice recommendations and reference systems. > > ________________________________ > Strategy Panel on ICANN's Role in the Internet Organizations' Ecosystem > > Chair: Vinton G. Cerf<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/bios#vinton-cerf> > > [http://www.icann.org/sites/default/files/styles/bio_photo/public/cerf-150x2…]<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/bios#vinton-cerf> > > Contact: ioepanel(a)icann.org <mailto:ioepanel@icann.org> > > Key Deliverables: > > * Facilitate review of the assumptions, linkages and frameworks that underlie ICANN's responsibilities in the current Internet ecosystem; > * Seek insights on ways to maintain and enhance ICANN's stewardship in an evolving ecosystem; and > * Cultivate thought leadership on ways in which ICANN can serve a complex set of Internet constituencies. > > ________________________________ > Strategy Panel on ICANN Multistakeholder Innovation > > Chair: Beth Simone Noveck<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/bios#beth-simon…> > > [http://www.icann.org/sites/default/files/styles/bio_photo/public/noveck-150…]<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/bios#beth-simon…> > > Contact: msipanel(a)icann.org<mailto:msipanel@icann.org> > > Key Deliverables: > > * Examine how Internet policy related to unique identifiers might be best managed in the future; > * Propose new models for broad, inclusive engagement, consensus-based policymaking and institutional structures to support such enhanced functions; and > * Design processes, tools and platforms that enable the global ICANN community to engage in these new forms of participatory decision-making. > > ________________________________ > Strategy Panel on the Public Responsibility Framework > > Chair: Nii Quaynor<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/bios#nii-quaynor> > > [http://www.icann.org/sites/default/files/styles/bio_photo/public/quaynor-15…]<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/bios#nii-quaynor> > > Contact: prfpanel(a)icann.org<mailto:prfpanel@icann.org> > > Key Deliverables: > > * Propose ICANN's role and five-year strategic objectives and milestones for promoting the global public interest vis-à-vis ICANN's mission and core values and for building out the base of internationally diverse, knowledgeable and engaged ICANN stakeholders, especially within the developing world; > * Propose a framework for implementation of ICANN's role, objectives and milestones for promoting the global public interest, building capacity within the ICANN community, and increasing the base of internationally diverse, knowledgeable and engaged ICANN stakeholders; and > * Provide advice on programs and initiatives that help achieve the above objectives. > > ________________________________ > Strategy Panel on the Role of ICANN in the Future of Internet Governance > > Chair: TBD > > [http://www.icann.org/sites/default/files/styles/bio_photo/public/placeholde…] > > Contact: figpanel(a)icann.org<mailto:figpanel@icann.org> > > Key Deliverables: > > * Provide a set of guiding principles to ensure the successful evolution of ICANN's transnational multistakeholder model in cooperation with national and international bodies; > * Propose a roadmap for evolving and globalizing ICANN's role in the Internet governance ecosystem in consultation with global players; and > * In coordination with the many other global players and ICANN stakeholders, propose a framework for implementation of ICANN's role, objectives and milestones in global Internet governance. > > ________________________________ > > > As the ICANN Strategy Panels get underway, additional information will be available via ICANN's strategic planning portal<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement>. > > > > This message was sent to matt.ashtiani(a)icann.org<mailto:matt.ashtiani@icann.org> from: > > ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 > > > Email Marketing by [http://app.icontact.com/images/icontact_tryFree.gif] <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186> > > > Manage Your Subscription <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=24564788&l=6333&s=BCA3&m=91…> > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC-Announce mailing list > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce > > At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > -- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html

1 0

Re: [APAC-Discuss] [ALAC] MoU with RIRs
by Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro July 23, 2013

July 23, 2013

Dear Fatimata, Thanks for sharing this. This is certainly what Holly was looking for and am sure she will be pleased to see a RALO template....:) Many thanks, Sala Sent from my iPad On Jul 24, 2013, at 4:42 AM, Fatimata Seye Sylla <fsylla(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello All, > > This is the MOU signed between AFRINIC and AFRALO. As stated by Sala, it is a framework that will allow our 2 organizations to undertake specific acitivities for the community. > > I hope this can help. > > Best, > Fatimata > > > 2013/7/23 Oksana Prykhodko <sana.pryhod(a)gmail.com> >> Dear all, >> >> Just to let you know - next ENOG (RIPE NCC Regional Meeting Russia/Eurasia >> Network Operators' Group) will be held in Kiev, 1-2 October ( >> http://www.enog.org/meetings/enog-6/) >> >> Next day - 3 October - we will have IV IGF-UA (igf-ua.org) It's great >> opportunity to build out cooperation with RIRs and to discuss joint >> projects in the European region. >> >> Best regards, >> Oksana >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro < >> salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Thank you for the quick feedback Jose. Given that MoUs are non- binding >> > and not enforceable and are merely there to help guide cooperation, my >> > suspicion is that there are certain aspects that will stay relatively the >> > same whilst others will differ as each RIR is independent and separate >> > legal entity and own internal governance. >> > >> > I would assume that as Europe discusses with RIPENCC and likewise NARALO >> > with ARIN and so forth, that the details would be subject to what is >> > generally agreed too. My suggestion is to keep the provisions fairly >> > generic and broad as details can change from time to time. >> > >> > Happy to initiate a draft MoU, the offer is on the table for all the >> > RALOs, at least a first Draft and people can comment on the draft etc and >> > have it revised. Unless, ICANN Legal does this for the RALOs? >> > >> > Kind Regards, >> > Sala >> > >> > Sent from my iPad >> > >> > On Jul 24, 2013, at 12:41 AM, José Francisco Arce < >> > josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi Holly, >> > > >> > > Just want to clarify that LACRALO does not have a MoU with the RIR (yet). >> > > We do many think togethers but not with that framework. After Durban >> > > meeting I personaly talk with Galsser Harmut and Andres Piazza of LACNIC >> > > and now we have to draft a MoU and send it to them. >> > > I heard that AFRALO has already a MoU , but I am not sure. I will ask. >> > > Would be great if we have all the same MoU, but I also now that regions >> > > maybe want different things. >> > > >> > > What can I provide you is our experience with the RIR. We are very >> > close. >> > > Just let me now if you want it. >> > > >> > > Kind Regards >> > > >> > > Jose Arce >> > > El jul 23, 2013 7:56 AM, "Holly Raiche" <h.raiche(a)internode.on.net> >> > > escribió: >> > > >> > >> Hi Sala >> > >> >> > >> I appreciate the offer, but my question was about the contents of >> > >> LACRALO's MoU. Once I (and Sandra) have an idea of what was in the >> > >> agreement, we can go to our respective RIRs and have a chat (and then a >> > >> chat with our constituents). THEN something can be written - and I >> > imagine >> > >> ICANN staff can help there. >> > >> >> > >> Holly >> > >> On 23/07/2013, at 1:27 PM, Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> Hi Holly, >> > >>> >> > >>> Happy to draft an MoU for APRALO and APNIC. >> > >>> >> > >>> Sala >> > >>> >> > >>> Sent from my iPad >> > >>> >> > >>> On Jul 22, 2013, at 1:40 PM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche(a)internode.on.net> >> > >> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>>> Hi Everyone >> > >>>> >> > >>>> I had a brief conversation with Paul Wilson, Chair of the NRO (and >> > >> Director Generao of ApNIC) and the APNIC External Relations Program >> > >> Director - who was keen to follow up on the meeting with RIRs - and >> > >> something more concrete in the way of a relationship between APNIC and >> > >> APRALO. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> So while I will follow up with him, I'd like examples of other >> > >> RIR/RALO relationships - particularly the LACRALO MoU - what does it >> > >> provide? AAny and all information is welcome so that I can provide the >> > >> sort of examples that will put the APNIC/APRALO relationship on a better >> > >> footing >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Holly >> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >> > >>>> ALAC mailing list >> > >>>> ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac >> > >>>> >> > >>>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org >> > >>>> ALAC Working Wiki: >> > >> >> > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… >> > >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> > >> ALAC mailing list >> > >> ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac >> > >> >> > >> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org >> > >> ALAC Working Wiki: >> > >> >> > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… >> > >> >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > ALAC mailing list >> > > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac >> > > >> > > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org >> > > ALAC Working Wiki: >> > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ALAC mailing list >> > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac >> > >> > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org >> > ALAC Working Wiki: >> > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> ALAC mailing list >> ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac >> >> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org >> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > > > > -- > Fatimata Seye Sylla > > > <MOU AFRINIC AFRALO 2 June 2013.pdf>

1 0

NomCom Final report card
by Siranush Vardanyan July 23, 2013

July 23, 2013

Dear APRALO colleagues, I hope those who were in Durban reached your homes safe and sound as I did. First of all I would like to thank all those who were in Durban, especially Holly, my colleagues from different RALOs and ICANN staff for their support in my new position of APRALO Vice Chair. We had several very fruitful meetings related to our region, as well as meetings related to the topic of increasing the cross regional communication and cooperation between RALOs. There will be some follow up steps and activities coming later, but at this point I am still wearing my NomCom hat, and sending you the final report card, which explains the work, which was done in Durban. Would like to mention that we had very important decision making event in Durban and the whole selection process had been done in collegial manner with having unanimous consensus for all selected candidates. As you all know the names of selected candidates will be announced in September. I had also opportunity to talk with Satish Babu, who will be the new NomCom member from APRALO starting from Buenos Aires meeting and shared my experience in serving in NomCom. I wish Satish full of luck in this very important but also very interesting and learning process. Thanks again for all your support, my dear colleagues. Best Siranush Siranush Vardanyan Armenia

2 1

email update
by KT - Karaitiana Taiuru July 21, 2013

July 21, 2013

Dear all, Please note my change of email address and note that The New Zealand Maori Internet Society (NZMS) has a new Chairwoman who will not be active in APRALO. I will remain as the Internet governance liaison. Regards, Karaitiana Taiuru Web: http://www.taiuru.maori.nz Skype/MSN/Google/Twitter/LinkedIn: ktaiuru Ph: +64 21 0707507 PO Box 10286 Christchurch 8145 Aotearoa/New Zealand ****Disclaimer:**** CAUTION: This email and any attachment(s) contains information that is both confidential and possibly legally privileged. No reader may make any use of its content unless that use is approved by Karaitiana Taiuru in writing. Any opinion, advice or information contained in this email and any attachment(s) is to be treated as interim and provisional only and for the strictly limited purpose of the recipient as communicated to me. Neither the recipient nor any other person should act upon it without my separate written authorisation of reliance. If you have received this message in error, please notify me immediately and destroy this message.

1 0

Re: [APAC-Discuss] FW: VOTE RESULTS: ALAC Voting Delegate to theNomCom for 2014 from APRALO
by h.raiche＠internode.on.net July 17, 2013

July 17, 2013

Hi Ali First, I agree, the voting process is confusing. However, by using preferential voting, the end result always indicates a winner. Just start with the notion that what is being counted is a person's choice, And if more people indicate that someone is their first choice by putting a 1 next to the name of their preferred candidate, that person will have the most '1's - or the lowest score. With that logic, the person who is the third choice with have the most '3's - or the highest score. Sorry if it is confusing, but it does produce an outcome showing people's preferred choice. And yes, there was some confusion as to when people could nominate. If you remember, Rinalia suggested that, before the process closed, the candidates should have an opportunity to talk to their candidacy - which is what you did and what happened. It meant that everyone voting had an opportunity to at least listen to the candidates. But what it meant was that the original deadlines had to be changed to accommodate the webinar. So what were hard and fast dates for nominations were moved. While that added to the confusion, it did give an opportunity for people to know a bit more about the candidates they would be voting for. I hope that has cleared things up but please get back to me with any further questions, and I apologise for not replying sooner. the ICANN meeting means I do not get to my emails as quickly as I should. Holly On Wed 17/07/13 9:03 PM , Ali AlMeshal dralialmeshal(a)gmail.com sent: Thanks for responding but I am not getting it yet, and what about the second part as well please? Ali On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:25 PM, ICANN At-Large Staff < staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> wrote: > Dear All, > > As a point of clarification, Satish Babu won. > > Please note that this poll was a preferential poll with the voters being > asked to place candidates in their order of preference from 1 to 3, with 1 > being the most preferred and 3 being the least preferred. As such, the > candidate with the highest preferred votes will have the lowest raw score. > > Regards, > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > Peregrine and Julia Charvolen > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > On 7/17/13 1:19 PM, "Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro" > wrote: > > >You won, are you disputing the fact that you won? > > > >Sent from my iPad > > > >On Jul 17, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Ali AlMeshal > wrote: > > > >> Good day , > >> > >> Would someone please get a response for me on the below clarification. > >> Also would need to understand the selection procedure. As per the > >>emails we > >> received with regard to the nomination procedure there was an open and > >> close date, which after it no nomination is accepted, so how come more > >> names get in later? > >> > >> > >> > >> Apologize , this is my first time to get in to this so would need to > >> understand how does it work. > >> > >> > >> Regards > >> Ali > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Ali AlMeshal > >>wrote: > >> > >>> I am confused here , what does this mean , the most preferred get lower > >>> score while the least prefer get the highest score . It was clearly > >>> mention that voting will be ranked from 1 as preferred to 3 as last > >>>option. > >>> So how does it work please. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:28 AM, ICANN At-Large Staff >>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Dear All, > >>>> > >>>> Please note that this poll was a preferential poll with the voters > >>>>being > >>>> asked to place candidates in their order of preference from 1 to 3, > >>>>with 1 > >>>> being the most preferred and 3 being the least preferred. > >>>> > >>>> As such, the candidate with the highest preferred votes will have the > >>>> lowest raw score. > >>>> > >>>> In this instance, the winner of the poll is Satish Babu. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> > >>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > >>>> Peregrine and Julia Charvolen > >>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > >>>> E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > >>>> > >>>> From: ICANN At-Large Staff >>>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org>> > >>>> Date: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 5:44 PM > >>>> To: "alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>>> alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>" >>>> alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>>> alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>> > >>>> Subject: VOTE RESULTS: ALAC Voting Delegate to the NomCom for 2014 > >>>>from > >>>> APRALO > >>>> > >>>> Dear All, > >>>> > >>>> With 14 out of 15 ALAC Members having voted in the ALAC Voting > >>>>Delegate > >>>> to the NomCom for 2014 from APRALO poll, we can confirm that the > >>>>result is > >>>> quorate. > >>>> > >>>> ***** > >>>> QUESTION > >>>> Please place the candidates below (listed in alphabetical order by > >>>> surname) in your order of preference from 1 to 3, with 1 being the > >>>>most > >>>> preferred and 3 being the least preferred, for the position of ALAC > >>>>Voting > >>>> Delegate to the NomCom for 2014 from APRALO. > >>>> > >>>> * Ali AlMeshal > >>>> * Gunela Astbrink > >>>> * Satish Babu > >>>> > >>>> RESULTS > >>>> As at Poll close: Tuesday 09 July 2013 23:59 UTC > >>>> Number of voters: 14 · Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 93.33 > >>>> Ranked by largest sum of preference votes > >>>> Rank Candidate Votes % > >>>> 1 Gunela Astbrink 35 41.67 > >>>> 2 Ali AlMeshal 31 36.90 > >>>> 3 Satish Babu 18 21.43 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ***** > >>>> We can confirm that the following members did not participate in this > >>>> vote: > >>>> Jean-Jacques Subrenat > >>>> > >>>> We can confirm that the following members abstained in this vote. For > >>>> those that have abstained, would you like to provide an explanation > >>>>of why > >>>> you abstained? > >>>> n/a > >>>> > >>>> You may review the results independently under: > >>>> http://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=3237Hky7EfZGWVX3QvzARuaU [1] > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> > >>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > >>>> Peregrine and Julia Charvolen > >>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > >>>> E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.orga > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> APAC-Discuss mailing list > >>>> APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss [2] > >>>> > >>>> Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org [3] > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> Ali AlMeshal > >>> > >>> Bahrain Internet Society - BIS > >>> > >>> Board Member ">> >>> > >>> Professional Public speaker in ICT and e-Business > >>> > >>> Payment Industry Expert Advisor > >>> > >>> Mobile: +973 39440025 > >>> > >>> Skype: alialmeshal > >>> > >>> email: dralialmeshal(a)gmail.com > >>> > >>> ali.almeshal(a)bis.org.bh > >>> > >>> http://www.bis.org.bh [4]">www.bis.org.bh > >>> > >>> Twitter :@internetBH > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Ali AlMeshal > >> > >> Bahrain Internet Society - BIS > >> > >> Board Member ">> >> > >> Professional Public speaker in ICT and e-Business > >> > >> Payment Industry Expert Advisor > >> > >> Mobile: +973 39440025 > >> > >> Skype: alialmeshal > >> > >> email: dralialmeshal(a)gmail.com > >> > >> ali.almeshal(a)bis.org.bh > >> > >> http://www.bis.org.bh [5]">www.bis.org.bh > >> > >> Twitter :@internetBH > >> _______________________________________________ > >> APAC-Discuss mailing list > >> APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss [6] > >> > >> Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org [7] > > -- Thanks Ali AlMeshal Bahrain Internet Society - BIS Board Member ">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss [9] Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org [10] Links: ------ [1] http://webmail-old.internode.on.net/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.big… [2] http://webmail-old.internode.on.net/parse.php?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fatlarg… [3] http://webmail-old.internode.on.net/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apr… [4] http://www.bis.org.bh [5] http://www.bis.org.bh [6] http://webmail-old.internode.on.net/parse.php?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fatlarg… [7] http://webmail-old.internode.on.net/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apr… [8] http://www.bis.org.bh [9] http://webmail-old.internode.on.net/parse.php?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fatlarg… [10] http://webmail-old.internode.on.net/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apr…

1 0

FW: VOTE RESULTS: ALAC Voting Delegate to the NomCom for 2014 from APRALO
by ICANN At-Large Staff July 17, 2013

July 17, 2013

Dear All, Please note that this poll was a preferential poll with the voters being asked to place candidates in their order of preference from 1 to 3, with 1 being the most preferred and 3 being the least preferred. As such, the candidate with the highest preferred votes will have the lowest raw score. In this instance, the winner of the poll is Satish Babu. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>> Date: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 5:44 PM To: "alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org>" <alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org>> Subject: VOTE RESULTS: ALAC Voting Delegate to the NomCom for 2014 from APRALO Dear All, With 14 out of 15 ALAC Members having voted in the ALAC Voting Delegate to the NomCom for 2014 from APRALO poll, we can confirm that the result is quorate. ***** QUESTION Please place the candidates below (listed in alphabetical order by surname) in your order of preference from 1 to 3, with 1 being the most preferred and 3 being the least preferred, for the position of ALAC Voting Delegate to the NomCom for 2014 from APRALO. * Ali AlMeshal * Gunela Astbrink * Satish Babu RESULTS As at Poll close: Tuesday 09 July 2013 23:59 UTC Number of voters: 14 · Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 93.33 Ranked by largest sum of preference votes Rank Candidate Votes % 1 Gunela Astbrink 35 41.67 2 Ali AlMeshal 31 36.90 3 Satish Babu 18 21.43 ***** We can confirm that the following members did not participate in this vote: Jean-Jacques Subrenat We can confirm that the following members abstained in this vote. For those that have abstained, would you like to provide an explanation of why you abstained? n/a You may review the results independently under: http://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=3237Hky7EfZGWVX3QvzARuaU Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>a

4 11

REMINDER: MEETING REPORTS
by ICANN At-Large Staff July 17, 2013

July 17, 2013

Dear All, As a reminder, please be sure to submit your meeting reports on the At-Large Durban Meeting Reports Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/bAV-Ag>. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

4 7