- At-Large - lists.icann.org

Re: [At-Large] [ALAC-Internal] City Top Level Domains
by Annette Muehlberg June 27, 2007

June 27, 2007

I can come up with some lines. Did you already prepare the presentation? - so i get an idea how best to put it in best annette > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com > Gesendet: 27.06.07 20:22:53 > An: <alac-internal(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > CC: alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Betreff: Re: [ALAC-Internal] [At-Large] City Top Level Domains > > Hi Annette > Do you have a firm idea or something already drafted for inclusion into the > presentation? > Jacqueline > > -----Original Message----- > From: Annette Muehlberg [mailto:Annette.Muehlberg@web.de] > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 1:57 PM > To: alac-internal(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Cc: alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: [At-Large] City Top Level Domains > > > -- > > All, > after our great workshop on Geo TLDs, especially city TLDs like .paris, > .nyc, .berlin, I think we should make a positive statement on the public > forum on this issue. > > best > annette > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org > > At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org > ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.10/873 - Release Date: 6/26/2007 > 11:54 PM > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.10/873 - Release Date: 6/26/2007 > 11:54 PM > > > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC-Internal mailing list > ALAC-Internal(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-lists… > > ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac > ALAC Official: http://alac.icann.org > ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org > --

1 0

Re: [At-Large] meeting with ccNSO
by Annette Muehlberg June 27, 2007

June 27, 2007

it looks that the workshop "keep the core neutral" will be going on for a while. very interesting. annette > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: "Izumi AIZU" <iza(a)anr.org> > Gesendet: 27.06.07 19:29:45 > An: "Hong Xue" <hongxueipr(a)gmail.com> > CC: Vittorio Bertola <vb(a)bertola.eu>, alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Betreff: Re: [At-Large] meeting with ccNSO > > I updated the wiki (anyone who has access can do so that's the beauty > of wiki) - the room - San Christobal B: > > izumi > > Wednesday, 27th June > > Time: 1530 - 1600 > Place: San Christobal B > Agenda: ALAC (and other interested community members) to attend the > ccNSO members open meeting to provide any further information or > thoughts subsequent to the Monday meeting. > > > 2007/6/28, Hong Xue <hongxueipr(a)gmail.com>: > > > > Wiki has not been > > updated--https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?san_juan_ccnso_coordination_di… > > > > Hong > > > > > > > > On 6/27/07, Vittorio Bertola <vb(a)bertola.eu> wrote: > > > Hong Xue ha scritto: > > > > > > > > Originally, this joint meeting was at 17:30-19:00pm today. Since ccNSO > > > > reschedules it, how long would it last now? > > > > > > Also, which is the ccNSO room? The one in front of the big main room? > > > Anyway, most of us will be at the "freedom of expression" workshop which > > > ends at 15:30, so we can move to the ccNSO right after it ends. > > > -- > > > vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- > > > --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <-------- > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ALAC mailing list > > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org > > ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org > > > > > -- > >> Izumi Aizu << > > Institute for HyperNetwork Society > Kumon Center, Tama University > * * * * * > << Writing the Future of the History >> > www.anr.org > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org > > At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org > ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org > --

1 0

City Top Level Domains
by Annette Muehlberg June 27, 2007

June 27, 2007

-- All, after our great workshop on Geo TLDs, especially city TLDs like .paris, .nyc, .berlin, I think we should make a positive statement on the public forum on this issue. best annette

2 1

APTLD Position on Top Level Internationalised Domain Names
by Hong Xue June 27, 2007

June 27, 2007

Please see APTLD Position on Top Level Internationalised Domain Names ( http://www.aptld.org/position/APTLD%20Position%20on%20Top%20Level%20Interna…) This document is formed at APTLD Dubai meeting. It's now being discussed at ccNSO. I don't believe ccNSO has opened the public consultation but nothing prevents us from doing some research right now. Hong

6 12

ConfirmSystem: registrar@icann.org [[f8f15e0449659352]]
by confirmsystem＠icann.org June 27, 2007

June 27, 2007

Hello You have sent a message to registrar(a)icann.org, an ICANN public comment forum. In order for your message to be accepted and published, we need for you to acknowledge your understanding of the fact that any messages sent to any ICANN comment forum will be published on the web. While the archiving process does obscure some email addresses, any personal identifying data will likely also become public. You can confirm your desire to publish your message two ways: 1) Reply to this message, without altering the subject line (The "Re: " added by many mail clients is OK, but please note that this method is *not* foolproof -- there is too much variety in how email clients handle messages to be sure we can parse every reply.) or 2) Visit the URL <http://confirm.icann.org/?s=f8f15e0449659352&l=registrar@icann.org> If you want to be very sure that your message gets through, do both steps above -- it does no harm to confirm more than once. For your reference, the subject of the message you sent was: "J4eger-LeCoultre repl1ca w4tch Luxury isn't a sin" and it arrived at approximately Tue Jun 26 23:49:34 2007. Thank you for your message. --------------------------------------------------------------- ConfirmSystem: registrar(a)icann.org [[f8f15e0449659352]] 2

1 0

ConfirmSystem: registry@icann.org [[101c7932d54c3666]]
by confirmsystem＠icann.org June 27, 2007

June 27, 2007

Hello You have sent a message to registry(a)icann.org, an ICANN public comment forum. In order for your message to be accepted and published, we need for you to acknowledge your understanding of the fact that any messages sent to any ICANN comment forum will be published on the web. While the archiving process does obscure some email addresses, any personal identifying data will likely also become public. You can confirm your desire to publish your message two ways: 1) Reply to this message, without altering the subject line (The "Re: " added by many mail clients is OK, but please note that this method is *not* foolproof -- there is too much variety in how email clients handle messages to be sure we can parse every reply.) or 2) Visit the URL <http://confirm.icann.org/?s=101c7932d54c3666&l=registry@icann.org> If you want to be very sure that your message gets through, do both steps above -- it does no harm to confirm more than once. For your reference, the subject of the message you sent was: "J4eger-LeCoultre repl1ca w4tch Luxury isn't a sin" and it arrived at approximately Tue Jun 26 23:49:32 2007. Thank you for your message. --------------------------------------------------------------- ConfirmSystem: registry(a)icann.org [[101c7932d54c3666]] 1

1 0

Recommendation regarding ALS approval
by Wendy Seltzer June 26, 2007

June 26, 2007

My proposal: After the RALO recommends for or against approval of an ALS candidate, the RALO's recommendation shall be followed on a no objections basis: namely, if no ALAC member raises an objection, the RALO's recommendation shall be followed. If any objections are raised, a vote of [2/3 majority among all of the members of the ALAC who cast a vote, provided at least nine members of the ALAC cast a vote] shall be required to overrule the RALO's recommendation. The bracketed language is a larger margin than I would have chosen, but comes from the Bylaws. I would have said majority of a quorum. --Wendy -- Wendy Seltzer -- wendy(a)seltzer.org Visiting Fellow, Oxford Internet Institute Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html http://www.chillingeffects.org/

2 1

Tonight's event in San Juan
by Vittorio Bertola June 26, 2007

June 26, 2007

Some information about tonight that I just received: ==== Tonight's social event is in the Old Town at the Puerto Rico Tourism Company offices at La Princesa Bldg. #2 Paseo La Princesa. This is one of the old Spanish style buildings. There will be craft artisans displaying their crafts, traditional music, folk ballet. There will be finger foods and Bacardi is sponsoring the bar. Buses will be leaving the Caribe Hilton in rotation between 5pm and 7pm. If you are interested in attending, just look at the buses. -- vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------

1 0

IDN Questions for ALAC Policy Priorities Workshop on Thursday June 28
by Hong Xue June 25, 2007

June 25, 2007

You may have seen that ALAC is going to have a Workshop on June 28, 14:00-16:00. One of the topics for discussion is internationalized domain names, which is one of the policy priorities of ALAC. To make our discussions more focused, Siavash and I drafted a list of questions as follows. You're welcome to comment on, rephrase or add on to these questions by Wednesday June 27. After the public consultation, the question list will be sent to the speakers from ICANN staff, GNSO and CCNSO. Hong > Q.1: What is the next step for IDNs? > Staff > > • When will the 3-phase IDN test commence? When will it be > completed? > > • Is there a timetable for an overall IDN implementation? > GNSO > > • Are the new gTLD guidelines intended to accommodate IDN applications as well? > > • Will GNSO apply the same requirements to both IDN gTLD applicants and ASCII gTLDs applicants (E.g., should amount of non-refundable money be paid by the applicant)? > CCNSO > > • Does CCNSO have any recommendation for starting IDN.IDN at ccTLD level? > Q.2: How to evaluate IDN TLDs? > > • How to define "confusing similarity"? > > • Should semantic similarity be an issue? > > • How to prevent user confusion? > > • Do you have any thought on preventing phishing or pharming through IDNs? > Q.3: How to evaluate IDN registries? > > Staff: > > • Who may join the IDN test? > GNSO > > • How to select IDN gTLD registries? > > • Should special consideration be given to the applicant from the > specific language community? > CCNSO > > • How to select IDN ccTLD registries? > > Q.4: How to ensure users' participation? > • > Staff > > • How to involve users in technical development? > GNSO & CCNSO > > • How can users participate the policy-making? > > • How to involve the language community in evaluating an IDN TLD > and its applicant? (this is also a question to ALAC itself)

1 1

RALO next steps?
by Jacqueline A. Morris June 25, 2007

June 25, 2007

Paul Twomey just mentioned in his President’s report the need for the RALOs to get going quickly on input to the policy processes of ICANN. He also mentioned this in both RALO meetings on Sunday. We should not focus exclusively on building up heavy structures, creating documents, rules and procedures, but we should focus on and move ahead on obtaining and transmitting the end user perspective on the main issues that are on the table at ICANN right now. Some of these are: · Protection of Registrants in relation to Registrars (RAA amendments) · IPv6 · IDNs · DNSSEC · gTLD process · ICANN Geographic Regions (a joint interest with the ccNSO) Most of these will be the subject of workshops or tutorials this week. For those of you who are here in San Juan, please make time to attend the sessions. Remote participation is available for most of the sessions as well. ALAC members who have focused on some of these issues, building specialties in certain issues, will also be available to discuss the issues with you if you want. We have also created At Large working groups on some of these issues, and you can find this information at https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?at_large_policy_working_groups Thanks everyone Jacqueline PS: Can AP and AF members forward this to those lists? (Alice, Hawa, Mohammed, Cheryl, Siavash, Izumi) I’ve not got access to those lists as yet – working on it. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.6/865 - Release Date: 6/24/2007 8:33 AM

2 1