- At-Large - lists.icann.org

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by narten＠us.ibm.com Oct. 24, 2019

Oct. 24, 2019

Total of 3 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri 25 Oct 2019 12:53:04 AM EDT Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 33.33% | 1 | 46.62% | 33056 | staff at atlarge.icann.org 33.33% | 1 | 33.90% | 24038 | joly at punkcast.com 33.33% | 1 | 19.47% | 13805 | narten at us.ibm.com --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 3 |100.00% | 70899 | Total

1 0

WEBCAST TODAY: UK Internet Governance Forum #UKIGF19
by Joly MacFie Oct. 24, 2019

Oct. 24, 2019

This is underway. ISOC Europe's Frédéric Donck and ISOC England's Olivier Crepin-Leblond are both speaking in the afternoon. ISOC Live posted: "Today, Thursday 24 October 2019, the UK Internet Governance Forum (UKIGF) is convened in London. This year’s theme is ‘Ensuring a healthy digital society by 2050’. Key topics: Data Governance; Digital Inclusion; Security, Safety, Stability & Resilienc" [image: livestream] <https://livestream.com/internetsociety/ukigf19>Today, *Thursday 24 October 2019*, the *UK Internet Governance Forum <https://ukigf.org.uk/events/2019-events/>* (UKIGF) is convened in London. This year’s theme is ‘*Ensuring a healthy digital society by 2050*’. Key topics: Data Governance; Digital Inclusion; Security, Safety, Stability & Resilience. The event will be simulcast on the *Internet Society Livestream Channel <https://livestream.com/internetsociety/UKIGF19/>*. *VIEW ON LIVESTREAM: https://livestream.com/internetsociety/ukigf19 <https://livestream.com/internetsociety/ukigf19>* *AGENDA: https://ukigf.org.uk/events/2019-events/ <https://ukigf.org.uk/events/2019-events/> (UTC+1)* *TWITTER: #UKIGF19 https://bit.ly/ukigf19 <https://bit.ly/ukigf19>* *Permalink*: https://isoc.live/11447/ - -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -------------------------------------------------------------- -

1 0

NOW OPEN - Call for Expressions of Interest (EoIs) for the At-Large Board Member Position 2019-2020 Cycle
by ICANN At-Large Staff Oct. 18, 2019

Oct. 18, 2019

* Ce message sera envoyé prochainement en ES et FR* *Este mensaje se enviará en breve en ES y FR* Dear All, On behalf of the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee (BCEC), we are seeking Expressions of Interest (EoIs) from individuals who wish to serve as an ICANN Board Director. The selected candidate will serve a 3-year term starting at the end of ICANN69 (2020 Annual General Meeting - AGM). Background Seat number 15 of the ICANN Board of Directors is dedicated to a member selected by the At-Large community. This seat is currently occupied by León Sánchez, who assumed the position at the end of ICANN60 (2017 AGM). His 3-year term will be completed at the closing of ICANN69 (2020 AGM), and he will be eligible for re-appointment. Pursuant to Section 19 of the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Rules of Procedure<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Rules+of+Procedure?preview=/226…> (RoP), the At-Large community began the selection process for the next Board Director in September 2019, with the appointment of the Chairs and Members of the BCEC and the Board Member Selection Process Committee (BMSPC). The BCEC is responsible for outlining candidate requirements and expectations, calling for, identifying, and evaluating applications, and compiling the initial slate of candidates. The BMSPC oversees the entire selection process, including the development of the selection timeline and the election process. Both groups have regionally balanced membership and operate in accordance with a strict code of conduct and confidentiality where applicable. For more information, please visit the At-Large Board Member Selection Home - 2019-2020<https://community.icann.org/display/ABMS/At-Large+Board+Member+Selection+Ho…>. In accordance with the ALAC Rules of Procedure (RoP), Regional At-Large Organizations (RALOs) may petition to have a candidate added to the slate. The BCEC is expected to finalize its selection by the end of 2019. Following the publication of the BCEC slate, unsuccessful applicants may opt to have their candidacy considered by the five RALOs. The overall selection process will conclude by Wednesday, 22 April 2020. The successful applicant will be announced on or before that date. How to Submit an Expression of Interest (EoI) Form Interested individuals should begin the process by reviewing the At-Large Board Member Candidate Requirements<https://community.icann.org/x/W5YCBw> 2019-2020 and the At-Large Board Member Candidate Reference Links & Resources<https://community.icann.org/x/Z4WGBg>. In particular, please ensure that you meet the eligibility requirements detailed under “Additional Bylaws Qualifications” on the At-Large Board Member Candidate Requirements<https://community.icann.org/x/W5YCBw> page. Those interested and are eligible should email BCEC Staff<mailto:bcec-staff@icann.org> to briefly indicate your interest. Upon receipt, At-Large staff will provide access to an online EoI Form for your completion. Specifically, applicants are requested to name three (3) to four (4) referees who are willing, at short notice, to provide a written reference for your candidacy when contacted by the BCEC and At-Large staff. The deadline for submitting an EoI Form for the BCEC’s consideration is 23:59 UTC on Monday, 11 November 2019. Please email the BCEC Staff<mailto:bcec-staff@icann.org> if you have more questions. Kind regards, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

1 0

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by narten＠us.ibm.com Oct. 17, 2019

Oct. 17, 2019

Total of 37 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri 18 Oct 2019 12:53:05 AM EDT Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 5.41% | 2 | 25.96% | 424919 | carlton.samuels at gmail.com 8.11% | 3 | 6.39% | 104647 | ms.narine.khachatryan at gmail.com 8.11% | 3 | 6.32% | 103415 | roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com 5.41% | 2 | 9.00% | 147368 | maureen.hilyard at gmail.com 5.41% | 2 | 5.80% | 94979 | 6.internet at gmail.com 5.41% | 2 | 5.42% | 88754 | remmyn at gmail.com 5.41% | 2 | 5.10% | 83480 | shreedeep at rayznews.com 5.41% | 2 | 4.00% | 65485 | soekpe at gmail.com 5.41% | 2 | 2.34% | 38343 | carlosraul at gutierrez.se 5.41% | 2 | 1.83% | 29963 | evan at telly.org 5.41% | 2 | 1.35% | 22052 | soriano.jose at gmail.com 2.70% | 1 | 3.97% | 64985 | jrjahangir at gmail.com 2.70% | 1 | 2.67% | 43735 | at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org 2.70% | 1 | 2.38% | 38940 | heidi.ullrich at icann.org 2.70% | 1 | 2.36% | 38547 | alberto at soto.net.ar 2.70% | 1 | 2.30% | 37651 | judith at jhellerstein.com 2.70% | 1 | 2.26% | 36925 | petersomoragbon at gmail.com 2.70% | 1 | 2.10% | 34355 | jzuck at innovatorsnetwork.org 2.70% | 1 | 1.94% | 31793 | sebicann at bachollet.fr 2.70% | 1 | 1.76% | 28843 | bikram.shrestha at idea.com.np 2.70% | 1 | 1.69% | 27600 | weaker41 at gmail.com 2.70% | 1 | 1.27% | 20756 | leonfelipe at sanchez.mx 2.70% | 1 | 1.02% | 16722 | carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com 2.70% | 1 | 0.76% | 12449 | narten at us.ibm.com --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 37 |100.00% | 1636706 | Total

1 0

Re: [At-Large] ATLASIII Participation
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 17, 2019

Oct. 17, 2019

Carlton, Greg beat me to it, but it is not an issue of travel as a "benefit". It is a resource, and all we are saying is that if we are to allocate that resource to a specific person, then we expect that it will be well used. The issue of electing/selecting someone for a position and then not having them deliver quite a different one, although again there *may* be travel funding involved. And yes, if we have someone who does not deliver and then select them again, there is a problem, and one I think that we need to address, but that sadly, many others feel that we should not, and simply heed the will of the electors who seem to at times reward the behaviour that some of us would like to punish (whether we have the tools or not). As you or someone said in a previous message, travel is a tool that facilitates volunteer contributions, nothing more or less. But it is a tool constrained by resources available and we should ALWAYS be paying attention to using our resources in a way that benefits At-Large and ICANN. That applies to travel, just as it applies to the extremely valuable resource of time donated (ie at no monetary cost to us or ICANN) by our volunteers. Neither should be squandered. Alan At 09/07/2019 10:07 PM, Carlton Samuels wrote: Hi Roberto: Funny enough, we are closer to total agreement than you imagine. You see, your second paragraph got to the heart of the issue. What to do when the job is not done? My response is to tell the same persons to their face that they did not contribute much. And, message the folks who elect them as representative as much. It's like electing a common fool for president and we blame the fool and not the voters who pulled the lever for the fool. In my corner of empire we tend to elect crooks, never fools. So we know what is our problem. I'm suggesting we can fix those problems without dangling travel or other funding as benefits to be removed as punishment. Especially if it devalues your efforts and mine. I have seen volunteers struggle to assimilate and articulate a position on an issue. I have seen so-called tourist travelers mature and make useful contributions. It is a crap shoot. So, I want to reinforce the fact that not everybody is interested in every topic the At-Large gets all bothered about. Indeed, I have seen a few that IMHO, isn't worth a bucket of warm spit to the end user that we allegedly represent in names and numbers policy matters. Not everybody need be interested in every topic to be a volunteer. Whosoever will may come. And, we can help them find their way in....or out. Best Carlton On Tue, 9 Jul 2019, 5:47 pm Roberto Gaetano, < roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com<mailto:roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com>> wrote: Hi Carlton. As usual, we agree on some things and we disagree on other. I fully support your view that travel, in particular when tickets are provided at the lowest possible cost - which implies also the lowest level of comfort and service - is not a benefit but "the tool that it is to get a job done”. Where we disagree is what to do if and when the job is not done. IMHO, ALAC does not have just the option, but the duty, to analyse whether the limited funds should be allocated in a different way to maximise the result. That is, as you correctly put, "to get a job done”. Incidentally, if ALAC does not monitor the fund allocation and show that there is no waste, ICANN will do. And I personally don’t like at all this outcome. But since I am well-known for making examples that are a bit extreme, and sometimes drive people mad, please allow me to be up to my reputation and mention this case. These days in Italy there are a couple of cases of public administrations, including a public hospital, where employees have been caught being repeatedly absent from work while colleagues were clocking them in and out. Am I the only one who sees similarities? Cheers, Roberto On 09.07.2019, at 23:14, Carlton Samuels < carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com<mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear John: I know you mean well. But I must register my profound and utter disagreement with you here. And, on principle. At-Large representatives are volunteers. Largely. I am seethe at this indignity that a measure of my voluntarism connects to me flying somewhere to volunteer my time, my energy, my intellectual capital and yes, my labour, all as public goods. I would not wish to be so judged. And what is proposed is nothing but an episode of the slave's torment; doing what he thinks would appease his master by providing the hog grease for the leather whip that stipes his own back. I came to this opposition from bitter experience. It started when I was the only elected LACRALO official. And in a period when travel was dangled as a benefit to volunteers. I couldn't give a tinker's damn since by that time I had already racked up 2 million plus airmiles. And traveling steerage class is not my idea of a fun time. In that period of time, LACRALO arguably provided the most egregious examples of the ICANN tourist traveler. And I suffered the slings of my northern metropolitan colleagues for vehemently opposing sanctions on the then LACRALO ALAC representatives. [I am ever grateful to Evan for supporting me on principle!] My argument was those persons behaved badly as individuals. I told them so. One has hated me to this day. But inspite of him, I adamantly refused to support travel sanctions against them. That action reinforces that rather louche idea that travel is a benefit rather than the tool that it is to get a job done. And to hypothecate the tool as security for work to be done seems immoral to me. Value is assigned my time and intellectual capital by others; I sell them for fee. I got home less than 2 hours ago from Suriname. Most in this thread would likely not even know where that is. it is a hump to get to. And, somebody paid me for that. As a volunteer, my time, intellectual capital and my own coin have been placed in trust and in the service of the At-Large. An airplane ticket in steerage does not begin to compensate me as volunteer. It is no benefit to me or for me. It is rude and crude to suggest, must less legislate, that it is. My position has not changed in these many years because the same response offends reason and conscience. It is for the At-Large constituents to pick representatives. And this seemingly Pavlovian response proffered is and remains a bad policy idea. It is inimical to the spirit of volutarism - real voluntarism! - that premises the At-Large engagement. Best, -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround ============================= On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 9:16 AM John Laprise <jlaprise(a)gmail.com<mailto:jlaprise@gmail.com>> wrote: I would like us all to consider consequences for ATLASIII participants who travel but do not participate (excepting reasons of illness etc). This is a serious, professional responsibility and should be treated as such. For a start, I would suggest that participants who fail to participate should be ineligible for funding and elections for 3 years. I look forward to conversation on this topic leading to action by the ALAC. Sent from my Pixel 3XL John Laprise, Ph.D. _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org<http://atlarge.icann.org/> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org<http://atlarge.icann.org/> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

37 78

Fwd: Read the SubPro PDP Newsletter - October 2019 Edition
by Maureen Hilyard Oct. 16, 2019

Oct. 16, 2019

For your information The latest edition is now available. New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP October 2019 Newsletter CURRENT STATUS Full Working Group The full Working Group continues to meet twice weekly for 90 minutes as it completes substantive review of public comments on its Initial Report <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…> and Supplemental Initial Report <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…>. Through this review, the Working Group is considering the comments received and determining what changes, if any, need to be made to the recommendations contained in the Final Report. To support the review, the Working Group is using a series of summary documents that provide an overview of the comments received on each topic included in the reports. The Working Group has completed review of public comments for the following topics: - Overarching Issues <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…>: including topics Continuing Subsequent Procedures, Predictability, Applications Assessed in Rounds, Different TLD Types, Application Submission Limits, Accreditation Programs (RSP Pre-Approval), Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice, Global Public Interest, Applicant Freedom of Expression, and Universal Acceptance. - Pre-Launch Activities <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…>: including topics Applicant Guidebook, Communications, and Systems. - Application Submission <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…>: including topics Application Fees, Variable Fees, Application Submission Period, Applicant Support, Terms and Conditions, Application Queuing, and Application Change Requests. - Application Evaluation/Criteria <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…>: including topics Reserved Names, IGO/INGO Protections, Registrant Protections, Closed Generics, String Similarity, IDNs, Security and Stability, Applicant Reviews, Role of Application Comment, and Name Collisions. - Dispute Proceedings <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…>: including topics Objections and Accountability Mechanisms. The Working Group is in the process of completing its review of topics related to String Contention Resolution <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…>, including Community Applications, Auctions: Mechanisms of Last Resort, and Private Resolution of Contention Sets. Please see the WG Work Plan <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…> for details. Work Track 5 Work Track 5 is currently reviewing a draft of the Final Report to be delivered to the full Working Group, which includes a set of recommendations on the treatment of geographic names at the top level. The latest version of the draft is available on the wiki <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…> . NEXT STEPS Full Working Group The Working Group plans to complete review of public comments on the following remaining topics in the coming weeks (see Work Plan <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…> for schedule): - Contracting <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…>: including topics Base Registry Agreement, Registrar Non-Discrimination / Registry/Registrar Standardization, and Registrar Support for New gTLDs. - Pre-Delegation <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…>: including topic Registry System Testing. - Post-Delegation <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…>: including topics TLD Rollout, Second Level Rights Protection Mechanisms, and Contractual Compliance. The Working Group will hold a series of face-to-face sessions at ICANN66. All are encouraged to attend and participate. During meetings on Saturday 2 November from 12:15 to 15:00 local time (session 1 <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…>, session 2 <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…>), the Working Group plans to discuss the Final Report of Work Track 5. On Monday 4 November, the Working Group will have additional meetings from 15:15 to 18:30 local time (session 3 <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…>, session 4 <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…>), which will be devoted to continuing work towards developing a set of final recommendations and considering topics that may require additional public comment. Work Track 5 Once it has finalized its Report, the Work Track will send its recommendations to the full Working Group for consideration. Recommendations will be subject to a consensus call in the full Working Group. The Work Track seeks to conclude prior to ICANN66. WHAT IS THIS ABOUT? In June 2014, the GNSO Council established a Discussion Group that was intended to evaluate the experiences of the 2012 round gTLD Program and to identify possible areas for future GNSO policy development. The Discussion Group’s deliverables <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…> served as the basis for the GNSO Council request for a Preliminary Issue Report in June of 2015. Following the publication of the Final Issue Report <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…>, the GNSO Council adopted the charter <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…> for the PDP Working Group, which began its work in February 2016. The Working Group initially concentrated on a set of overarching issues. It later conducted deliberations on additional topics in its charter using five separate Work Tracks: Work Track 1 - Overall Process/Support/Outreach, Work Track 2 - Legal/Regulatory, Work Track 3: String Contention/Objections & Disputes, Work Track 4: Internationalized Domain Names/Technical & Operations, Work Track 5: Geographic Names at the Top Level. WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT? The Discussion Group identified a number of subjects that may require further analysis and possible formulation of policy language. There are existing policy recommendations adopted by the GNSO Council and ICANN Board, which will remain in place unless the PDP WG determines that changes are needed. More Information - Workspace Wiki <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…> - Charter <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…> - Active Project Page <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…> - GNSO Website <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…> To join this effort, please email the GNSO Secretariat: gnso-secs(a)icann.org. All are welcome! Follow the GNSO on Twitter [image: Twitter] ‌ <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001qimUKY41_YqWPJFyGzr-T_M22ND7JRSWVM1Nyh9UWYQ6…> ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Unsubscribe maureen.hilyard(a)gmail.com <https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=un&m=00115LrDzKl3LoTB9FWCDiE2A%3D&…> Update Profile <https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=oo&m=00115LrDzKl3LoTB9FWCDiE2A%3D&…> | About Constant Contact <http://www.constantcontact.com/legal/about-constant-contact> Sent by emily.barabas(a)icann.org in collaboration with [image: Trusted Email from Constant Contact - Try it FREE today.] <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=nge&rmc=VF19_3GE> Try email marketing for free today! <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=nge&rmc=VF19_3GE>

1 0

ATLAS III vs NASIG travellers
by Maureen Hilyard Oct. 15, 2019

Oct. 15, 2019

Dear ATLAS travellers If you are NOT registered as a NASIG participant do not respond to their emails. Their programme has nothing to do with ICANN or with ATLAS III. While there are ATLAS participants attending the NASIG event it is important that they are kept separate. It is totally confusing for everyone if you are responding to an email that is not an official ATLAS III communication from At-Large staff (specifically Gisella). It would be helpful if you a little bit more attentive to where the email has come from. Thanks. Maureen

4 3

suscribe
by Jose Soriano Oct. 15, 2019

Oct. 15, 2019

-- Abrazo fraterno

1 0

So...who celebrates Halloween?
by Jonathan Zuck Oct. 14, 2019

Oct. 14, 2019

1 0

Submission
by Jose Soriano Oct. 14, 2019

Oct. 14, 2019

-- Enviado con Gmail Mobile

2 1