May 2013 - APAC-Discuss - lists.icann.org

Re: [APAC-Discuss] APAC-Discuss Digest, Vol 78, Issue 47
by Siranush Vardanyan May 19, 2013

May 19, 2013

Please, dial me out for this call (+374 94947773). Thanks Siranush > From: apac-discuss-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: APAC-Discuss Digest, Vol 78, Issue 47 > To: apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 12:00:06 +0000 > > Send APAC-Discuss mailing list submissions to > apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > apac-discuss-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > apac-discuss-owner(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of APAC-Discuss digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. IMPORTANT WEBINAR - APRALO Webinar on the ALAC role > (At-Large Staff) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 18:13:52 +0100 > From: At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > Subject: [APAC-Discuss] IMPORTANT WEBINAR - APRALO Webinar on the ALAC > role > To: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org>, APAC-Discuss > <apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Message-ID: <CDBD732A.E8366%gisella.gruber(a)icann.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > Dear All, > > Further to the Doodle poll, the Webinar on the ALAC role is scheduled on > Monday 20 May 2013 at 0700 UTC. > > For other times > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=APRALO+Webinar+on+t > he+ALAC+role&iso=20130520T07 > > Tiny url: > http://tinyurl.com/b6zl9s2 > > The agenda and call details are available at: > https://community.icann.org/x/ph9-Ag > > Adobe Connect room: > http://icann.adobeconnect.com/apralo > If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff > at:staff@atlarge.icann.org. > > Thank you. > Regards, > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > Peregrine and Julia Charvolen > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > One World, One Internet > > > > From: At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > Date: Thursday, 16 May 2013 10:58 > To: APAC-Discuss <apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Cc: At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > Subject: Urgent - DOODLE - APRALO Webinar on the ALAC role > > Dear All, > Based on the results of the poll, APRALO members have agreed to re-schedule > the vote to select the APRALO Representative to the ALAC (2013-2015) to > allow time to hold a webinar on the ALAC role. > The ALAC role requires a certain level of awareness-raising and exchanges > in terms of performance expectations, required skill and knowledge sets, > workload coping mechanisms, etc. This webinar will assist interested > individuals and voters to have a good understanding of what is required for > the ALAC position. > Please complete the attached Doodle poll to schedule this webinar early next > week. > http://www.doodle.com/45m9534m77xqvr67 > > This Doodle poll will close on Friday 17 May 2013 at 2200 UTC. The date and > time will be announced shortly thereafter. > Thank you. > Regards, > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > Peregrine and Julia Charvolen > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > One World, One Internet > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > APAC-Discuss mailing list > APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > > > End of APAC-Discuss Digest, Vol 78, Issue 47 > ********************************************

1 0

VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: APRALO Selection for Vice Chair
by ICANN At-Large Staff May 17, 2013

May 17, 2013

Dear All: ICANN Policy Staff in support of the ALAC would like to announce the start of the vote for the APRALO Selection for Vice Chair. The term for this position will begin 1-July-2013 and end 30-June-2015. ***** Question: Please place the candidates below (listed in alphabetical order by surname) in your order of preference from 1 to 3, with 1 being the highest and 3 being the lowest, for the APRALO Elections for Vice Chair. * Satish Babu (Computer Society of India) * YJ Park (Open Standards and Internet Association, South Korea) * Siranush Vardanyan (Armenian Association for the Disabled) ***** Please note that the poll will be open from 17-May-2013 23:59 UTC to 07-June-2013 23:59 UTC. Additional information may be found on the 2013 APRALO Selection Call - APRALO Chair, Vice-Chair and Secretariat Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/LJ1wAg>. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

SELECTION RESULTS: APRALO Chair
by ICANN At-Large Staff May 17, 2013

May 17, 2013

Dear All: ICANN Policy Staff in support of the ALAC would like to announce the results for the APRALO Chair. On 10-May-2013, at the close of nominations for position of APRALO Chair, there was only one candidate who had been nominated and accepted: Holly Raiche (ISOC-AU). Accordingly, Holly Raiche was re-elected APRALO Chair by acclamation. The term for this position will begin 1-July-2013 and end 30-June-2015. Additional information may be found on the 2013 APRALO Selection Call - APRALO Chair, Vice-Chair and Secretariat Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/LJ1wAg>. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

Review of ICANN - your feedback please
by Holly Raiche May 15, 2013

May 15, 2013

Hi Everyone Time is running out for our - community input - into this review. The background to it all is on the ALAC policy page - with more than enough links. In summary, the Affirmation of Commitments agreement with the US Department of Commerce asked for four reviews. While ALAC has our own people on the review (Olivier and Alan), the review needs to go much wider - to all of you. The website (links are on our policy page) take you to a survey, which you can take. But if you don't want to go through all of that, you can just send an email directly to them (or through me or Olivier/Alan) to provide comments - but PLEASE - SOON (end of May-first week of June at the LATEST) What they are asking is below (I have REALLY summarised). So please think it over, and let them know. And if you have questions, ASK THEM. It means there is an information gap where there should not be. So - go to the ALAC policy page, have a read and a think - and then feedback please, to me, to Olivier, or directly to the ATRTs team either through the survey or directly. (And you don't have to answer all of the questions - some of them are not relevant to us anyway) Thanks Holly The Headings are: Accountability and Transparency Review team 1 (ATRT1) - the review before this one The questions are about - whether you think the ICANN Board and Staff have implemented the recommendations (there is a link to the ATRT1 Report on the ICANN policy page) - whether the Board is assessing and improving its governance - do you know how Board members are nominated/elected - questions about GAC - not really for us unless you have particular views - ICANN processes for receiving public input - and how easy it is to do so - and have you done so/when - Are ICANN decisions supported or embraced by the public or the Internet community - and how do you/your organisation do so? - does the public development process work - can it be improved? Do ICANN processes facilitate cross community input? Security, Stability and Resiliency of the DNS Review Team These questions are about the extent to which ICANN has implemented recommendations of this team Whois Policy Review Team - the extent to which recommendations of this report have been implemented - and what are the metrics? - what improvements have come about as a result? Accountability and Transparency of ICANN processes - how would you rate community participation in accountability and transparency issues - other questions.

1 0

Welcome to Rome and NEW: Join our LIVE online stream and online dialogue!
by Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro May 15, 2013

May 15, 2013

Dear All, For those who are interested in e learning. There is an online livestream. Details are below. Kind Regards, Sala > > > De: Stracke, Christian [mailto:Christian.Stracke@icb.uni-due.de] > Enviada: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 9:46 AM > Para: Stracke, Christian > Assunto: LINQ 2013 conference is starting TOMORROW: Welcome to Rome and NEW: Join our LIVE online stream and online dialogue! > > > > Dear colleague, > > > > the LINQ 2013 conference (www.learning-innovations.eu) is starting tomorrow: > > We are looking forward to welcoming you in Rome! > > > > And LINQ 2013 will have an online LIVE STREAM: > > You can also see and follow all keynotes and all invited speeches and workshops online via LIVE STREAM: > > http://www.learning-innovations.eu/2013/programme#livestream > > > > We kindly invite you in addition: > > Join the online dialogue during our LINQ 2013 conference! > > > > For all Twitter users, please address your comments, questions, and pictures to: > > #LINQ2013 > > To stay up-to-date on the different sessions, follow: > > @LINQ_Conference > > > > Would like to hear follow-up stories and be informed about LINQ events in the future? > > Please “like” our LINQ conference Facebook page: > > www.facebook.com/LINQConference > > > > Please share this information about our live stream and online dialogue with all your colleagues and networks: > > Thank you very much distributing it through all channels, your blog, website, tweets and all social media! > > > > Looking forward to our dialogue on learning innovations and learning quality on Thursday and Friday at FAO in Rome! > > > > Best wishes > > Christian > > > > > > With best regards > > > > Christian Stracke > > > > --- > > > > Christian M. Stracke > > Elected ISO-Convener of ISO/IEC JTC1 SC36/WG5 > Elected Chair of CEN TC 353 > European and international Coordinator > HR, E-Learning, Quality and Competence Development > University of Duisburg-Essen, Campus Essen > Universitaetsstr. 9 (ICB) > D-45141 Essen (Germany) > Tel.: +49-(0)201-183-4410 > Fax: +49-(0)201-183-4067 > E-mail: Christian.Stracke(a)uni-due.de > > LINQ: The Leading Conference for Learning Innovations and Quality > > QLET for Quality in Learning, Education and Training > > ISO/IEC JTC1 SC36 for International Standardization and Learning Standards > > CEN/TC 353 for European Standardization and Learning Norms > > >

1 0

VOTE ENTENDED: Schedule of the Selection Process for the 2013-2015 APRALO Representative to the ALAC
by ICANN At-Large Staff May 14, 2013

May 14, 2013

Dear All, Please note that the APRALO poll on the "Schedule of the Selection Process for the 2013-2015 APRALO Representative to the ALAC" has been extended as the current results are tied. As a result, the APRALO Chair has asked that Staff extend the poll until Friday 17-May-2013 23:59 UTC. ALS representatives which have already voted WILL NOT need to cast their ballots again. ALS representative which have NOT already voted will be sent reminders to cast their ballots. Please note that if you are unable to vote online, you may email ICANN At-Large Staff and indicate your vote. Staff will then manually add it to the total votes. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

Re: [APAC-Discuss] [ALAC] [IDN-WG] Draft Statement on TMCH and Variants
by Alan Greenberg May 13, 2013

May 13, 2013

Note that the TMCH has two separate components. The backend and the interface with registries is, I believe, a single database and is being run under contract to ICANN by IBM. The interface to TM holders and the validation service is contracted to Deloitte. The design explicitly allows for distributed user interfaces and validation services to ensure proper handling of different languages, scripts and TM law. Alan At 23/04/2013 07:17 PM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote: >Also agree with Yaovi on removing the word "centralized" >And thanks to Hong and Rinala for the work done on this statement. > >Dev Anand > >On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Evan Leibovitch <evan(a)telly.org> wrote: > > +1 > > > > In any case, the opening of offices in Turkey and Singapore makes it hard > > to argue that ICANN isn't at least making an attempt to decentralize. > > > > (Please don't see my relative silence as lack of interest, but rather lack > > of depth in the issue) > > > > - Evan > > > > > > On 23 April 2013 14:19, Yaovi Atohoun <yaovito(a)yahoo.fr> wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> In the statement we can read : > >> "... we strongly urge ICANN to move away from a model that is centralized, > >> inflexible and unfriendly to variants. " > >> > >> My question : Is is not possible to have a model that is centralized and > >> taking into account IDN variant issues? > >> If so my recommendation is to remove the word "Centralized" in the > >> sentence above. > >> > >> > >> Yaovi > >> > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> De : JJS <jjs.global(a)gmail.com> > >> À : Rinalia Abdul Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim(a)gmail.com> > >> Cc : apralo <apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>; No name < > >> idn-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>; ALAC Working List < > >> alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > >> Envoyé le : Dimanche 21 avril 2013 4h11 > >> Objet : Re: [ALAC] [IDN-WG] Draft Statement on TMCH and Variants > >> > >> > >> *Dear Rinalia,* > >> * > >> * > >> *you've done a very thorough job, thank you. * > >> *Below, my **suggested modifications in red.* > >> * > >> * > >> *ALAC Advice to the ICANN Board on Trademark > Clearinghouse and IDN Variants > >> * > >> > >> The At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) is deeply concerned by the > >> implementation model outlined in the Trademark Clearinghouse: Rights > >> Protection Mechanism Requirements published > on April 6, 2013. We view the > >> model to be deficient in that it overlooks the critical issue of IDN > >> variants; thus implemented, the model would clearly run against the public > >> interest in the pertinent > >> user communities.* > >> * > >> > >> *(1) Domain Name Matching* > >> > >> Language communities have requested that TMCH services factor IDN-script > >> trademarks involving variants and that ICANN consider adopting > >> community-based solutions to address this issue since October 2011. > >> Despite > >> concerns raised by language community experts in the TMCH Implementation > >> Assistance Group (IAG), the domain name matching requirements of the TMCH > >> still does not take into account trademarks in IDN scripts involving > >> variants. Variant matching is critical in certain languages and > >> particularly in Chinese. To illustrate, when a trademark > >> holder registers a simplified Chinese word-mark and not its traditional > >> equivalent, the TMCH will accordingly generate only one trademark record. > >> The > >> new gTLD registries are obliged to offer sunrise services and trademark > >> claims for trademarks recorded in the TMCH. Without variant matching > >> requirements in place, only that registered simplified word-mark will be > >> eligible for trademark protection. This leaves the traditional word-mark > >> equivalent open for cybersquatting. Given that both simplified and > >> traditional writings of the word-mark are deemed identical by Chinese > >> communities worldwide (and by norm few trademarks are registered in both > >> writings), > >> ruling out the un-registered writing by not > allowing variant matching would > >> make the TMCH completely useless to Chinese > trademarks, and would result in > >> an unfair penalty against users of Chinese. > >> > >> *A More Open and Flexible TMCH Model* > >> > >> Trademarks have a very important function in safeguarding the public > >> interest by > >> identifying the source of goods and services. > >> > >> *The rest seems fine.* > >> * > >> * > >> *Best regards,* > >> *Jean-Jacques.* > >> > >> > >> 2013/4/20 Rinalia Abdul Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim(a)gmail.com> > >> > >> > Dear Members of the IDN WG, APRALO and ALAC Colleagues, > >> > > >> > I have revised the proposed " *ALAC Advice to the ICANN Board on > >> Trademark > >> > Clearinghouse and IDN Variants*" based on Hong's draft, input received > >> in > >> > Beijing and my own consultation with IDN Variant experts. > >> > > >> > Please review and comment on the draft on > the wiki for tracking purposes. > >> > The wiki page for the draft is here - > >> > > >> > > >> > https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/ALAC+Advice+to+the+ICANN+… > >> > > >> > Once the text is deemed satisfactory, it will be forwarded to the ALAC > >> for > >> > a vote. Please try your best to respond with comments by Friday April > >> > 26th. > >> > > >> > Text pasted below for rapid review. The final version will be proofread > >> > and > >> > a summary of recommendations will be produced as part of the final > >> version > >> > (as per our norm in giving advice to the Board). > >> > > >> > Best regards, > >> > > >> > Rinalia > >> > > >> > *ALAC Advice to the ICANN Board on Trademark Clearinghouse and IDN > >> > Variants > >> > * > >> > > >> > The At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) is deeply concerned by the > >> > implementation model outlined in the Trademark Clearinghouse: Rights > >> > Protection Mechanism Requirements published on April 6, 2013. We view > >> the > >> > model to be deficient in that it overlooks the critical issue of IDN > >> > variants, which would seriously impact the public interest in the > >> pertinent > >> > user communities. > >> > > >> > We wish to highlight two areas of particular concern in the Trademark > >> > Clearinghouse (TMCH) requirements: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > *(1) Domain Name Matching* > >> > > >> > Language communities have requested that TMCH services factor IDN-script > >> > trademarks involving variants and that ICANN consider adopting > >> > community-based solutions to address this issue since October 2011. > >> > Despite > >> > concerns raised by language community experts in the TMCH Implementation > >> > Assistance Group (IAG), the domain name > matching requirements of the TMCH > >> > still does not take into account trademarks in IDN scripts involving > >> > variants. Variant matching is critical for certain languages and > >> > particularly for the Chinese language. To illustrate, when a trademark > >> > holder registers a simplified Chinese word-mark and not its traditional > >> > equivalent, the TMCH will accordingly > generate only one trademark record. > >> > The > >> > new gTLD registries are obliged to offer sunrise services and trademark > >> > claims for trademarks recorded in the TMCH. Without variant matching > >> > requirements in place, only that registered simplified word-mark will be > >> > eligible for trademark protection. This > leaves the traditional word-mark > >> > equivalent open for cybersquatting. Given that both simplified and > >> > traditional writings of the word-mark are > deemed identical by the Chinese > >> > community (and by norm few trademarks are registered in both writings), > >> > ruling out the un-registered writing by not allowing variant matching > >> would > >> > make the TMCH completely useless to Chinese trademarks. > >> > > >> > > >> > *(2) Domain Name Bundling* > >> > > >> > The TMCH requirements specifically prohibit any registry from > >> implementing > >> > variant or bundling rules and allocating domain names under such > >> variant > >> > or bundling rules prior to the conclusion > of the Sunrise Period. Such a > >> > restriction would exclude the accommodation of any solution for IDN > >> > trademarks involving variants during the > sunrise period at the TLD level, > >> > even though registries may be willing to address the variants through > >> their > >> > own registration management and at their own expense. > >> > > >> > *A More Open and Flexible TMCH Model* > >> > > >> > Trademarks have a very important function of safeguarding the public > >> > interest by > >> > identifying the source of goods and services. If left unaddressed, the > >> > deficiencies of the TMCH model design may likely cause serious public > >> > confusion and result in market chaos. In principle, the At-Large > >> community > >> > does not support over-extensive trademark protection measures. However, > >> we > >> > do strongly believe that ICANN should treat all trademarks equally, > >> > irrespective of the characters of the > trademarks, and that users from all > >> > language communities should be protected from confusion equally. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > In September 2012, the ALAC statement on > the TMCH called for a more open > >> > and flexible model that can address our communitys concerns regarding > >> the > >> > limitations of a uniform model, which would be applied to all gTLD > >> > registries irrespective of their differences and competencies. We > >> believe > >> > that new gTLD registries require a more open and flexible TMCH model to > >> be > >> > successful and we strongly urge ICANN to move away from a model that is > >> > centralized, inflexible and unfriendly to variants. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > In light of the considerations above, the ALAC urges the ICANN Board to > >> > call for a more open and flexible TMCH model. Towards this end, we urge > >> > the Board to support a community-based, bottom-up solution for TMCH > >> > implementation and to ensure that the IDN variant issue is addressed > >> before > >> > the TMCH begin providing services to the new gTLD registries. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > We understand that addressing the IDN Variant issue in a holistic way > >> > requires the development of Label Generation Rules (LGR) for the Root > >> Zone, > >> > which experts and Staff have projected to > require a minimum of 12 months. > >> > We > >> > appreciate that the LGR development requires conscientious effort to > >> > maintain the security and stability of the Internet, but we are also > >> > mindful that the business and practical requirements of new gTLD > >> > applicants, especially from developing economies, call for urgent > >> > implementation. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > To expedite the development of appropriate > solutions, the ALAC recommends > >> > that the Board request from the ICANN CEO an interim mechanism that can > >> > yield such solutions efficiently and on an urgent basis. This may > >> require > >> > additional Staff with the appropriate linguistic capabilities working in > >> > tandem with community members with relevant expertise. It may also > >> require > >> > a consideration of expediting the LGR process for the Han script. We > >> > understand that in the general case, the handling of variants is a > >> complex > >> > issue. However, for variant cases that are well defined and understood, > >> > such as the case of the Han script, ICANN should proceed on a fast-track > >> > basis to include variant support in the TMCH in time to accommodate the > >> > delegation of the appropriate TLDs. > >> > > >> > END > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > IDN-WG mailing list > >> > IDN-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/idn-wg > >> > > >> > IDN WG Wiki: > >> > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+IDN+Policy > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ALAC mailing list > >> ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > >> > >> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > >> ALAC Working Wiki: > >> > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ALAC mailing list > >> ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > >> > >> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > >> ALAC Working Wiki: > >> > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Evan Leibovitch > > Toronto Canada > > > > Em: evan at telly dot org > > Sk: evanleibovitch > > Tw: el56 > > _______________________________________________ > > ALAC mailing list > > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > > > > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > > ALAC Working Wiki: > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > >_______________________________________________ >APAC-Discuss mailing list >APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > >Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org

10 18

DNSSEC Performace
by Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro May 12, 2013

May 12, 2013

Dear All, There's an interesting paper by G.Huston and G. Michaelson see: http://www.potaroo.net/ispcol/2013-05/dnssec-performance.html There are some interesting considerations that they raise in their paper that is worthwhile factoring in for those planning to sign DNS. Kind Regards, Sala Sent from my iPad

1 0

Uncharted Domains and the New Land Rush: Indigenous Rights to Top-Level Domain
by NZMIS Chairperson May 11, 2013

May 11, 2013

Greetings, As representative groups of Internet users, and as many of us are discussing how best to represent our communities; you may be interested in this students award winning research on ICANN, GTLD's and Indigenous Domain Names, Intellectual Property etc., all of which impact all regions in the world. Perhaps some of the concerns can be raised again in ALAC? Background: http://www.law.asu.edu/News/CollegeofLawNews.aspx?NewsId=4454 Research: http://www.law.asu.edu/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=67fmPnuMWEY%3d <http://www.law.asu.edu/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=67fmPnuMWEY%3d&tabid=803> &tabid=803 Regards, Karaitiana Taiuru Web: <http://www.taiuru.maori.nz> http://www.taiuru.maori.nz Skype/MSN/Google/Twitter/LinkedIn: ktaiuru Ph: +64 21 0707507 PO Box 10286 Christchurch 8145 Aotearoa/New Zealand

5 6

Re: [APAC-Discuss] APAC-Discuss Digest, Vol 78, Issue 38
by Siranush Vardanyan May 10, 2013

May 10, 2013

Dear all, I can't find the link to the voting space. I didn't receive the e-mail, stating to vote or any reminders. Can you send the link to me for voting? Thanks Siranush > From: apac-discuss-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: APAC-Discuss Digest, Vol 78, Issue 38 > To: apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 12:00:05 +0000 > > Send APAC-Discuss mailing list submissions to > apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > apac-discuss-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > apac-discuss-owner(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of APAC-Discuss digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: APRALO election on main ALAC (Holly Raiche) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 13:54:32 +1000 > From: Holly Raiche <h.raiche(a)internode.on.net> > Subject: Re: [APAC-Discuss] APRALO election on main ALAC > To: Silvia Vivanco <silvia.vivanco(a)icann.org>, ICANN At-Large Staff > <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org>, APRALO Discuss > <apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Message-ID: <54169B3C-3424-4026-8FD4-8584F0360023(a)internode.on.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > HI Everyone > > Just a reminder - and those of you who did not vote earlier will have received a reminder - today is the last day to vote on the timing of the election process for the APRALO election to ALAC. So Silvia, please let me know ASAP what the outcome is. (the outcome will be determined by a majority of the votes cast) > > If the outcome is to proceed with the existing schedule, then we can continue, as follows: > > 13 May - call for nominations, with nomination period to end 23 May > Noting: for those who have nominated, please reconfirm the nomination and seconding. > > 23-30 May - acceptances for nominations > Noting again: for those who have accepted a nomination, please reconfirm your acceptance > > 7 -13 June - election period. > > If the poll is to delay the elections, the schedule will be: > > between 14 May and 3 June - Webinar on ALAC Membership - (this will allow time for the organisation of the webinar and for those considering ALAC membership to attend the webinar and join in a discussion about ALAC membership) > > 27 May - 14 June - call for nominations > > 21 June - end of period for acceptance of nominations > > 28 June - 5 July - elections. > > > So please - vote if you have not already done so. > > Holly > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > APAC-Discuss mailing list > APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > > > End of APAC-Discuss Digest, Vol 78, Issue 38 > ********************************************

1 0