April 2020 - Latingp - lists.icann.org

Summary of Latin GP Meeting on 9 April 2020
by Pitinan Kooarmornpatana April 15, 2020

April 15, 2020

Dear Latin GP members, Please find attached the summary of the Latin GP meeting on 9 April 2020. Please let us know if you would like to suggest any edits or additions. Action Items S. No.Action ItemsOwner 1Review previous conclusions relevant to Small Letter I setMT The recording for this meeting and the note are posted at Latin GP wiki page at https://community.icann.org/display/croscomlgrprocedure/Latin+GP. Regards, Pitinan

1 0

AGENDA for the GP call on April the 16th 2020, 16:00UTC
by Mirjana Tasić April 15, 2020

April 15, 2020

Dear GP members, Please find enclosed the proposal of Agenda for our call. Any comments, corrections and suggestions are welcome. Regards Mirjana _______________________________________________________________________________________________ AGENDA for the GP call on April the 16th 2020, 16:00UTC 1. Roll call 2. Discuss Appendix D cases which the first reviewer proposed variants<https://1drv.ms/w/s!AoE6DtesaqpIg3SCe0G-rXH5J97x?e=N3zaJl> (7 cases). (7) D.4.16 Circumflex Above + Grave Above 3. D.1.5 Latin Small Letter I vs. Latin Small Letter Dotless I vs. Latin Small Letter Iota 4. Discuss Appendix D next cases, Pitinan will prepare the document for discussion 1. Status of Generic glyphs analysis<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17sPMStYinmsFOqZNWw8goqf8bq2SGiWr3xw…> 2. Skip-ink underlining Analysis<https://1drv.ms/w/s!AoE6DtesaqpIg3XPzp-OFR7gptZ9?e=eFufnK> how to proceed 3. AOB Material for D.1.5 Latin Small Letter I vs. Latin Small Letter Dotless I vs. Latin Small Letter Iota From the Report: Cross-Script variant proposal Latin Small Letter Iota 0269 ɩ ↔ ւ 0582 Armenian Small Letter Yiwn Blocked Glyphs nearly identical due to font design Latin Small Letter I 0069 i ↔ і 0456 Cyrillic Small Letter Belarusian-Ukrainian I Blocked Homoglyph Latin Small Letter Dotless I 0131 ı ↔ ι 03B9 Greek Small Letter Iota Blocked Homoglyph Latin Small Letter Iota 0269 ɩ ↔ ι 03B9 Greek Small Letter Iota Blocked Homoglyph In-Script variant proposal Latin Small Letter Dotless I 0131 ı ↔ ɩ 0269 Latin Small Letter Iota Blocked In-script variant due to transitivity relationship of 03B9 Greek Small Letter Iota [BJ – move to Transitivity Section 6.7] Latin Small Letter I 0069 i ↔ ỉ 1EC9 Latin Small Letter I with Hook Above Blocked 6.5.5 Dot above and hook above in In-script variant analysis Latin Small Letter Dotless I 0131 ı ↔ ɩ 0269 Latin Small Letter Iota Blocked 6.5.9. Misc in In-script variant analysis 0069 i Latin Small Letter I 0069 + 0331 i̲ Latin Small Letter I + Combining Macron Below YES Blocked Glyphs nearly identical due to underlining 0069 i Latin Small Letter I 1ECB ị Latin Small Letter I with Dot Below YES Blocked Glyphs nearly identical due to underlining

1 0

[Updated Zoom Link] Latin GP Meeting
by Pitinan Kooarmornpatana April 15, 2020

April 15, 2020

Dear Latin GP members, We have updated the zoom link for Latin GP meetings on Thursdays 16:00UTC. Please join the meeting at the updated link: https://icann.zoom.us/j/95395839226?pwd=ZGxpYmRqV2E2NjloWTFHZWNGbkJWZz09 Password: 096517 Regards, Pitinan -------------- To join via phone, please find your local number at https://icann.zoom.us/u/aw6COk4xD Meeting ID: 953 9583 9226 Password: 096517

1 0

Latin GP Meeting Link
by Bill Jouris April 9, 2020

April 9, 2020

Am I the only one without a working link for today's meeting? Bill Jouris Inside Products bill.jouris(a)insidethestack.com 831-659-8360 925-855-9512 (direct)

1 0

Re: [Latingp] AGENDA for the GP call on April the 9th 2020, 16:00UTC
by Tan Tanaka, Dennis April 8, 2020

April 8, 2020

Hi Mirjana, I have a conflict with tomorrow’s conf call, so I won’t be able to attend the first half of the meeting. Best, Dennis From: Latingp <latingp-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Mirjana Tasić <Mirjana.Tasic(a)rnids.rs> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 3:39 PM To: Latin GP <latingp(a)icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Latingp] AGENDA for the GP call on April the 9th 2020, 16:00UTC Dear GP members, Please find enclosed the proposal of Agenda for our call. Any comments, corrections and sugestions are welcome. Regards Mirjana _______________________________________________________________________________________________ AGENDA for the GP call on April the 9th 2020, 16:00UTC 1. Roll call 2. Discuss Appendix D cases which the first reviewer proposed variants<https://1drv.ms/w/s!AoE6DtesaqpIg3SCe0G-rXH5J97x?e=N3zaJl> (7 cases). (1) D.1.1 Latin Small Letter F vs. Latin Small Letter F with Hook FINISHED (2) D.1.9 Latin Small Letter D with Caron vs. Latin Small Letter D with Hook (3) D.1.5 Latin Small Letter I vs. Latin Small Letter Dotless I vs. Latin Small Letter Iota (4) D.2.1 Latin Small Ligature Æ vs. Sequence AE (5) D.3.7 Double Acute vs. Diaeresis (6) D.4.2 Circumflex and Hook Above (7) D.4.16 Circumflex Above + Grave Above 3. Status of Generic glyphs analysis<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17sPMStYinmsFOqZNWw8goqf8bq2SGiWr3xw…> 4. Skip-ink underlining Analysis<https://1drv.ms/w/s!AoE6DtesaqpIg3XPzp-OFR7gptZ9?e=eFufnK> how to proceed 5. AOB

1 0

AGENDA for the GP call on April the 9th 2020, 16:00UTC
by Mirjana Tasić April 8, 2020

April 8, 2020

Dear GP members, Please find enclosed the proposal of Agenda for our call. Any comments, corrections and sugestions are welcome. Regards Mirjana _______________________________________________________________________________________________ AGENDA for the GP call on April the 9th 2020, 16:00UTC 1. Roll call 2. Discuss Appendix D cases which the first reviewer proposed variants<https://1drv.ms/w/s!AoE6DtesaqpIg3SCe0G-rXH5J97x?e=N3zaJl> (7 cases). (1) D.1.1 Latin Small Letter F vs. Latin Small Letter F with Hook FINISHED (2) D.1.9 Latin Small Letter D with Caron vs. Latin Small Letter D with Hook (3) D.1.5 Latin Small Letter I vs. Latin Small Letter Dotless I vs. Latin Small Letter Iota (4) D.2.1 Latin Small Ligature Æ vs. Sequence AE (5) D.3.7 Double Acute vs. Diaeresis (6) D.4.2 Circumflex and Hook Above (7) D.4.16 Circumflex Above + Grave Above 1. Status of Generic glyphs analysis<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17sPMStYinmsFOqZNWw8goqf8bq2SGiWr3xw…> 2. Skip-ink underlining Analysis<https://1drv.ms/w/s!AoE6DtesaqpIg3XPzp-OFR7gptZ9?e=eFufnK> how to proceed 3. AOB

1 0

(Updated) Summary of Latin GP Meeting on 2 April 2020
by Pitinan Kooarmornpatana April 3, 2020

April 3, 2020

Dear All, An action item was added as suggested by Bill. Please find attached the updated note from Latin GP meeting on 2 April 2020. S. No.Action ItemsOwner 1Test and submit the test result as assigned at test case table before the next meetingMM 2Adjust the summary table for Skip-Ink into three categories as discussedPK 3Rate the glyph pairs in Generic Glyphs Cross-Script Analysis Google SheetsALL 4Summary the data from Generic Glyphs Cross-Script Analysis Google SheetsBJ 5Suggest the sequence case to compare combining marks via emailMD The recording for this meeting and the note are posted at Latin GP wiki page at https://community.icann.org/display/croscomlgrprocedure/Latin+GP. Regards, Pitinan From: Latingp <latingp-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <pitinan.koo(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, April 3, 2020 at 00:51 To: ICANN Latin GP <latingp(a)icann.org> Subject: [Latingp] Summary of Latin GP Meeting on 2 April 2020 Dear Latin GP members, Please find attached the summary of the Latin GP meeting on 2 April 2020. Please let us know if you would like to suggest any edits or additions. Action Items S. No.Action ItemsOwner 1Test and submit the test result as assigned at test case table before the next meetingMM 2Adjust the summary table for Skip-Ink into three categories as the GP discussedPK 3Rate the glyph pairs in Generic Glyphs Cross-Script Analysis Google SheetsALL 4Suggest the sequence case to compare combining marks via emailMD The recording for this meeting and the note are posted at Latin GP wiki page at https://community.icann.org/display/croscomlgrprocedure/Latin+GP. Regards, Pitinan

1 0

Re: [Latingp] Generic Glyphs Cross-Script Analysis Google Sheets
by Mats Dufberg April 3, 2020

April 3, 2020

Let me describe again what I see as an issue on lines 10-15 in "Generic Glyphs Cross-Script Analysis" https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17sPMStYinmsFOqZNWw8goqf8bq2SGiWr3xw… On line 10-12 we compare the sequence "006F 006C 006F 006C 006F" with the sequence "0B20 0B3E 0B20 0B3E 0B20" but we only mention U+006C and U+0B3E, respectively. The issue is not what we compare in columns H and I, but the problems are: 1. We do not state in colums C-F what we compare, only part of it. 2. If we come to the conclusion that there should be variants, what is the variant pair? What we should compare is probably "olol" with "0B20 0B3E 0B20 0B3E" and the possible variant candidate should then be the sequences "ol" vs "0B20 0B3E". Also in columns C-F those sequences should be listed. What I written above also applies for lines 13-15. Mats --- Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg(a)internetstiftelsen.se DNS Specialist Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation) Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://internetstiftelsen.se/

2 3

Underlining Analysis
by Meikal Mumin April 3, 2020

April 3, 2020

Dear colleagues, please find attached my part of the analysis of the underlining behavior. Best, Meikal

1 0

Summary of Latin GP Meeting on 2 April 2020
by Pitinan Kooarmornpatana April 2, 2020

April 2, 2020

Dear Latin GP members, Please find attached the summary of the Latin GP meeting on 2 April 2020. Please let us know if you would like to suggest any edits or additions. Action Items S. No.Action ItemsOwner 1Test and submit the test result as assigned at test case table before the next meetingMM 2Adjust the summary table for Skip-Ink into three categories as the GP discussedPK 3Rate the glyph pairs in Generic Glyphs Cross-Script Analysis Google SheetsALL 4Suggest the sequence case to compare combining marks via emailMD The recording for this meeting and the note are posted at Latin GP wiki page at https://community.icann.org/display/croscomlgrprocedure/Latin+GP. Regards, Pitinan

1 0