- Latingp - lists.icann.org

AGENDA for the GP call on April the 9th 2020, 16:00UTC
by Mirjana Tasić April 8, 2020

April 8, 2020

Dear GP members, Please find enclosed the proposal of Agenda for our call. Any comments, corrections and sugestions are welcome. Regards Mirjana _______________________________________________________________________________________________ AGENDA for the GP call on April the 9th 2020, 16:00UTC 1. Roll call 2. Discuss Appendix D cases which the first reviewer proposed variants<https://1drv.ms/w/s!AoE6DtesaqpIg3SCe0G-rXH5J97x?e=N3zaJl> (7 cases). (1) D.1.1 Latin Small Letter F vs. Latin Small Letter F with Hook FINISHED (2) D.1.9 Latin Small Letter D with Caron vs. Latin Small Letter D with Hook (3) D.1.5 Latin Small Letter I vs. Latin Small Letter Dotless I vs. Latin Small Letter Iota (4) D.2.1 Latin Small Ligature Æ vs. Sequence AE (5) D.3.7 Double Acute vs. Diaeresis (6) D.4.2 Circumflex and Hook Above (7) D.4.16 Circumflex Above + Grave Above 1. Status of Generic glyphs analysis<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17sPMStYinmsFOqZNWw8goqf8bq2SGiWr3xw…> 2. Skip-ink underlining Analysis<https://1drv.ms/w/s!AoE6DtesaqpIg3XPzp-OFR7gptZ9?e=eFufnK> how to proceed 3. AOB

1 0

(Updated) Summary of Latin GP Meeting on 2 April 2020
by Pitinan Kooarmornpatana April 3, 2020

April 3, 2020

Dear All, An action item was added as suggested by Bill. Please find attached the updated note from Latin GP meeting on 2 April 2020. S. No.Action ItemsOwner 1Test and submit the test result as assigned at test case table before the next meetingMM 2Adjust the summary table for Skip-Ink into three categories as discussedPK 3Rate the glyph pairs in Generic Glyphs Cross-Script Analysis Google SheetsALL 4Summary the data from Generic Glyphs Cross-Script Analysis Google SheetsBJ 5Suggest the sequence case to compare combining marks via emailMD The recording for this meeting and the note are posted at Latin GP wiki page at https://community.icann.org/display/croscomlgrprocedure/Latin+GP. Regards, Pitinan From: Latingp <latingp-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Pitinan Kooarmornpatana <pitinan.koo(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, April 3, 2020 at 00:51 To: ICANN Latin GP <latingp(a)icann.org> Subject: [Latingp] Summary of Latin GP Meeting on 2 April 2020 Dear Latin GP members, Please find attached the summary of the Latin GP meeting on 2 April 2020. Please let us know if you would like to suggest any edits or additions. Action Items S. No.Action ItemsOwner 1Test and submit the test result as assigned at test case table before the next meetingMM 2Adjust the summary table for Skip-Ink into three categories as the GP discussedPK 3Rate the glyph pairs in Generic Glyphs Cross-Script Analysis Google SheetsALL 4Suggest the sequence case to compare combining marks via emailMD The recording for this meeting and the note are posted at Latin GP wiki page at https://community.icann.org/display/croscomlgrprocedure/Latin+GP. Regards, Pitinan

1 0

Re: [Latingp] Generic Glyphs Cross-Script Analysis Google Sheets
by Mats Dufberg April 3, 2020

April 3, 2020

Let me describe again what I see as an issue on lines 10-15 in "Generic Glyphs Cross-Script Analysis" https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17sPMStYinmsFOqZNWw8goqf8bq2SGiWr3xw… On line 10-12 we compare the sequence "006F 006C 006F 006C 006F" with the sequence "0B20 0B3E 0B20 0B3E 0B20" but we only mention U+006C and U+0B3E, respectively. The issue is not what we compare in columns H and I, but the problems are: 1. We do not state in colums C-F what we compare, only part of it. 2. If we come to the conclusion that there should be variants, what is the variant pair? What we should compare is probably "olol" with "0B20 0B3E 0B20 0B3E" and the possible variant candidate should then be the sequences "ol" vs "0B20 0B3E". Also in columns C-F those sequences should be listed. What I written above also applies for lines 13-15. Mats --- Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg(a)internetstiftelsen.se DNS Specialist Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation) Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://internetstiftelsen.se/

2 3

Underlining Analysis
by Meikal Mumin April 3, 2020

April 3, 2020

Dear colleagues, please find attached my part of the analysis of the underlining behavior. Best, Meikal

1 0

Summary of Latin GP Meeting on 2 April 2020
by Pitinan Kooarmornpatana April 2, 2020

April 2, 2020

Dear Latin GP members, Please find attached the summary of the Latin GP meeting on 2 April 2020. Please let us know if you would like to suggest any edits or additions. Action Items S. No.Action ItemsOwner 1Test and submit the test result as assigned at test case table before the next meetingMM 2Adjust the summary table for Skip-Ink into three categories as the GP discussedPK 3Rate the glyph pairs in Generic Glyphs Cross-Script Analysis Google SheetsALL 4Suggest the sequence case to compare combining marks via emailMD The recording for this meeting and the note are posted at Latin GP wiki page at https://community.icann.org/display/croscomlgrprocedure/Latin+GP. Regards, Pitinan

1 0

Generic Glyphs Cross-Script Analysis Google Sheets
by Mats Dufberg April 2, 2020

April 2, 2020

I see an error in the sheet. I lines 10-15 it says that the non-Latin code point is U+0B3E but the character is actually a string "0B20 0B3E". Generic Glyphs Cross-Script Analysis Google Sheets<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17sPMStYinmsFOqZNWw8goqf8bq2SGiWr3xw…>. I also have a problem with U+1062 (Myanmar Vowel Sign Sgaw Karen Eu). I do not seem to have a glyph for that in my fonts. Mats --- Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg(a)internetstiftelsen.se DNS Specialist Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation) Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://internetstiftelsen.se/

3 2

Meeting today?
by Mats Dufberg April 2, 2020

April 2, 2020

When I click on the link it says that the meeting scheduled for 2020/2/13 and nothing comes up. --- Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg(a)internetstiftelsen.se DNS Specialist Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation) Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://internetstiftelsen.se/

2 1

Re: [Latingp] Meeting today?
by Pitinan Kooarmornpatana April 2, 2020

April 2, 2020

Hi Mats, could you try again. It should be ok now. https://icann.zoom.us/j/931353600 Regards, Pitinan From: Latingp <latingp-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg(a)internetstiftelsen.se> Date: Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 23:01 To: ICANN Latin GP <Latingp(a)icann.org> Subject: [Latingp] Meeting today? When I click on the link it says that the meeting scheduled for 2020/2/13 and nothing comes up. --- Mats Dufberg mats.dufberg(a)internetstiftelsen.se DNS Specialist Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation) Mobile: +46 73 065 3899 https://internetstiftelsen.se/

1 0

Summary of Latin GP Meeting on 26 March 2020
by Pitinan Kooarmornpatana April 2, 2020

April 2, 2020

Dear Latin GP members, Please find attached the summary of the Latin GP meeting on 26 March 2020. Please let us know if you would like to suggest any edits or additions. Action Items S. No.Action ItemsOwner 1Test and submit the test result as assigned at test case table before the next meetingMM 2Rate the Generic Glyphs Cross-Script Analysis Google SheetsALL 3Draft the explanation for the Latin Small Letter D with Caron issueMD 4Check all relevant sections for Latin Small Letter D with Caron for further discussionPK The recording for this meeting and the note are posted at Latin GP wiki page at https://community.icann.org/display/croscomlgrprocedure/Latin+GP. Regards, Pitinan

2 1

MT Underlining test case analysis
by Mirjana Tasić April 2, 2020

April 2, 2020

Dear GP members, Here is my part of underlining test case analysis. Regards Mirjana

3 2