April 2009 - lac-discuss-en

Fwd: Selection process for ICANNs CEO & President
by Carlton Samuels April 21, 2009

April 21, 2009

For your information. Carlton Samuels ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" < wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> Date: 2009/4/17 Subject: [governance] ICANNs CEO & President To: governance(a)lists.cpsr.org Dear list as we all know there is a process under way to select/elect a new CEO & President for ICANN. My knowledge for the moment is that a special head hunting company was hired and a special board committee with five members (ICANN directors, chaird by the ICANN chair) is dealing with the issue. However there is only little transparency in the procress of nomination and selection so far. During the Mexico At Large Summit we called for more transparncy in ICANN procedures. I do not know what other members of the list are thinking but my understanding is that at least some transparency in the process would be important to build trust and institutional confidence into the future of ICANN. I understand very well - as a former Associated Chair of the NomCom - that some elements of the process has to be handled in a confidential way. However the CEO& President is different from an ordinary ICANN Director and it would be helpful for the whole community and the various constituencies that they are - in one way or another - informed and partly also involved in the process. My understanding of the timetable is that until the Sydney meeting there will be a shortlist and after the Sydney meeting the Board will make its decision.The CEO is elected by the Board. One idea to improve and enhance trust and transparency could be that during the forthconing Sydney meeting the shortlisted candidates are invited to present their views and visions on ICANNs operation and its future. They should be available also for a Q&A sessions to the broader ICANN community. The At Large Community would be the legtimite body to ask for such a publich hearing. It would be very consistent with what we called for in the ATLAS Mexico Declaration. Wolfgang _

1 0

HEAD OF CATTLE: REMINDER/LACRALO Teleconference Today AT 2100UTC
by sylvia＠prontocl.com.br April 16, 2009

April 16, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: HEAD OF CATTLE: REMINDER/LACRALO Teleconference Today AT 2100UTC From: sylvia(a)prontocl.com.br Dear Compañeros de Lacralo: Lamentably podre not to participate in the teleconferência of today, or quizas arrive late, since I am in another teleconferencing with a client acting like interpreter. Deberiamos to have finished for 1/2 hour, butwe have even been in the heat of work. The moan much! I will be connected by skype, please are writing a summary! Thank you very much! Sylvia Herlein Leite Brazil Internaut -----Mensagem original Of: lac-discuss-in-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [ mailto:lac-discuss-in-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org ] command post nome of AT-Large Staff Shipment command post: fifth-feira, 16 of April of 2009 16:38 It stops: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Assunto: [ lac-discuss-in ] REMINDER/LACRALO Teleconference Today AT 2100 UTC Prioridade: Discharge Dear All, We would like to remind you that the next teleconference of the LACRALO will be held today, Thursday, April 16 AT 21:00 UTC. You for dog find the draft agenda and instructions participating in the call AT: https://st.icann.org/lacralo/index.cgi?16_april_2009 If you need to dial-out, please kindly inform AT-Large staff AT: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Regards, Estimado/a Señor/a, Hereby, we remembered to him that the next teleconferencing ofthe LACRALO it will take place, today, Thursday, 16 of April to 21:00 hours UTC. It will find the preliminary version of the agenda and other individuals in: https://st.icann.org/lacralo/index.cgi?16_april_2009 If they need that we call to him and nonfigure already in the list of people a to call, please must to good warn in AT staff(a)atlarge.icann.org to us Kindly, Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, GisellaGruber-White, Marie-Helene Bouchoms ICANN AT-Large Staff email: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/f8c56ac68e.html --]]

1 0

Interested in At-Large Working Groups? Now they're easier to find
by Nick Ashton-Hart April 16, 2009

April 16, 2009

Dear Community: In order to help make it easier for you to participate in policy activities in At-Large - and to see what others are working on - we've created a single wiki portal to all the various working groups. You may find this at [1]https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?at_large_working _groups. If it is easier for you, these are also available from the 'Current Issues' tab of the At-Large community website at [2]http://www.atlarge.icann.org. -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Tel: +33 (450) 42 81 83 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: : +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile: (Switzerland): +41 79 595 5468 Mobile (France): +33 (68) 514 1633 email: [3]nashton(a)consensus.pro Win IM: [4]ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: [5]nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: [6]https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart References 1. https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?at_large_working_groups 2. http://www.atlarge.icann.org/ 3. mailto:nashton@consensus.pro 4. mailto:ashtonhart@hotmail.com 5. mailto:nashtonhart@mac.com 6. https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN Office Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 Office Fax: +41 (22) 594 8544 Mobile: +41 (79) 595 5468 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

2 1

FW: LACRALO AGENDA
by carlosaguirre62＠hotmail.com April 15, 2009

April 15, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: FW: LACRALO AGENDA From: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com Friends of LACRALO. them envio some links that can serve to armto our agenda and plan of work for the future immediate. Most important he is than the members of the region can also identify those questions within the ICANN AGENDA and outside, to conform our own agenda. Some ítems of which they are possible to be nourished are: "Present Subjects" in the Web of AT Large: http://www.atlarge.icann.org/issues Web site of ICANN - Policy and Policy update: http://www.icann.org/en/topics/policy Web site of ICANN - Policy "Key Activities" http://www.icann.org/en/policy AT Large Policy Working Groups: https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?at_large_policy_working_groups And to that to add to which Andrés said about the forums of Policy of each RIR, in our case, the Forum of Policy of LACNIC. Let us begin to make contributions, we cannot delay but our work in the region! Ademas Jose Ovid and who writes to them needs Yours input to transfer it in ALAC. a hug to all. Carlos Dionisio Aguirreabogado - Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 to www.derechoytecnologia.com.ar http://ar.ageiadensi.org _________________________________________________________________ Querés to know how is going to be the climate tomorrow? Ingresá now to MSN http://tiempo.ar.msn.com/ _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/d567e058aa.html --]]

1 0

ICANN Responde questions
by andrespiazzagpj＠hotmail.com April 15, 2009

April 15, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: ICANN Responde questions From: andrespiazzagpj(a)hotmail.com (English Below) Considered, As some remember, ICANN established a "Ballot box of Questions Online" (Online Question Box) in the meeting of Mexico. Different questions were made on thematic: - ICANN as organization (26 questions). - Registrars - RAA (23). - Guide for interested in New GTLDs (19). - Public Participation (6). - IDNs/Fast Track (6). - Transparency and Surrender of Accounts (2). - Others (14). ICANN provides answers (so far only in English) through this Link http://www.icann.org/en/participate/mexico-City-public-forum-response.html Although NOBODY pertaining one to this list made questions, ifthere are questions from members of other Thin ones and Individual Users of our region. This information and the one that ICANN provides in other similar processes it is very important to consider in general and, in individual, we will have to consider it at the time of consolidating the LACRALO AGENDA (one remembers to them that this presidency is receptive of contributions on the LACRALO AGENDA until day 30 of April). Warm Greetings, Andrés Piazza President of LACRALO (English) Dear All, ICANN publishes to Response and Summary to the "Online Question Box" from Mexico Meeting. Available All the neccesary information is in english following this Link: http://www.icann.org/en/participate/mexico-City-public-forum-response.html This information, and the one that ICANN would provide in other similar process is concerns to be considered, in general. But particularly we have to take in account in order to develop the LACRALO AGENDA (to remember that the LACRALO Chair is receiving all the contributions in order to form that until AGENDA April 30th). Warm Regards, Andrés Piazza LACRALO Chair President _________________________________________________________________ Stay up to dates on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Live Windows http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/119462413/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/e0f66ca2a5.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =?windows-1252?q?apoyo_para_la_consolidaci=F3n_d = =?windows-1252?q?el_NCSG =
by andrespiazzagpj＠hotmail.com April 14, 2009

April 14, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?windows-1252?q?apoyo_para_la_consolidaci=F3n_d = =?windows-1252?q?el_NCSG = From: andrespiazzagpj(a)hotmail.com Thanks Victory, Just to add that NCSG, is to another important space to provideIMPUT in ICANN. I want also to Copy part of the text, the point related to "INELIGIBLEORGANIZATIONS". It says: 4, Organizations that plows represented in ICANN through to another Supporting Organization or to another GNSO Stakeholder Group. However, organizations and individuals that participate in ICANN's AT Large Advisory Committee plows not excluded by this criterion, though they may be excluded by the to other three. Regards, Andrés Piazza LACRALO Chair President (Spanish) Thanks Victory: To only add that NCSG is another great space to provide IMPUT in ICANN. The copied text refers to that, within the point destined Organizations "Inelegibles", special reference to which ties like world AT Large, like COMPATIBLE becomes. Greetings Andrés Piazza President of LACRALO > Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:18:46 -0700 > From: victoria_fava(a)yahoo.com > To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] support for the consolidation ofthe NCSG > > Considered: > > As delegated of Ageia Densi before the NCUC I invite to all the members of the Region to add itself to the initiative of Robin Gross for the consolidation of Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group (NCSG). > > the presentation will tomorrow be made 15 of April before the Board of ICANN. > > In case of being interested in adding itself to this initiative, will have to send an email to robin(a)ipjustice.org, lettingknow their support him. > > Next attached the explanatory email > > > I for a.m. contacting you in the hopes that you will add your organization's support the proposed Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group (NCSG) civil charter AT ICANN by signing this joint society statement: http://www.ipjustice.org/ICANN/NCSG/NCSG_Charter_Civil_Society_Support.pdf > Ace yo! u know, the Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC) is the organization that represents non-commercial interests and advocates for the protection of digital rights including free expression, privacy, due process of law and to other non-commercial interests in ICANN-GNSO policy discussions. Ace part of ICANN's GNSO Restructuring efforts, the 6 "constituencies" plows being replaced by 4 to broader "to stakeholder groups", including to Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group (NCSG) to represent the interests of non-commercialusers of domain names in the GNSO policy sand AT ICANN. > NCUC there are submitted to petition for the charter of the NCSG that intends to encourage to broader civil society participation AT ICANN and aims to increase the relative to power of non-commercial interests in ICANN policy negotiations. Noncommercial individuals and organizations plows invited to participate in the NCSG, which will be governed by to stakeholder group wide elections to under the petiti! on. > All of the proposed to stakeholder group petitions plows! in the midst of to Public Comment Period AT ICANN (until 15 April) under the ICANN Board of Directors general dog receive input from the public on the various to stakeholder group petitions. Today I write to ask that your organization to consider signing onto the attached joint civil society statement supporting for proposal NCUC's to stakeholder group petition to be filed in the Public Comment forum. > The NCSG non-commercial charter needs your support to ensure that all interests have to voice through to their GNSO representatives and in the creation of policy. The competing NCSG "cyber-safety" charter proposed by Cheryl Preston (BYU) and the CP80 Foundation (Ralph Yarro)you have been designed to ensure that its vocal minority global calling for ICANN to undertake content regulation in the name of "cyber-safety" will be guaranteed GNSO Council seats despite opposition from the rest of the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group. > for We ask your support because we want the to stakehol! der group that represents non-commercial interests to be able to generate sound,consensual, and collaborative policy and decisions that plows representative of all of the members in the to stakeholder group. We also need your support because the crusaders of online content regulation via CP80/Yarro plows taking advantage of the GNSO Restructuring efforts ace an opportunity to impose to their agenda of online content regulation via ICANN by hard-wiring it onto the GNSO Policy Council. Traditional Without the voices of human rights, to consumer protections, and civil society weighing in during the Public Comment Period, the ICANN Board of Directors could be persuaded to accept for proposal CP80/Yarrós to stakeholder group petition and significantly Seth back the fight for online freedom by over-representation of narrowly focused special-interest groups who lack broad support from all non-commercial stakeholders. > In summary, the for NCUC's petition to Non-Commercial Stakehol! der proposal Group is the best of those submitted because it: ! > > Emp hasizes democratic representation to the Generic Names Supporting Organization instead of to constituency-based approach thatgives disproportionate to power to select groups. > Encourages cooperation and inclusiveness through consensus-building among members of the to stakeholder groups. > Ensures that minority viewpoints plows heard and to their policy ideas plows explored through an increased reliance on working groups. > flexible Operates with to and lightweight framework that allows it to focus on representing non-commercial interests without getting bogged down by bureaucratic details. > civil Was drafted in consultation with dozens of society organizations representing all corners of the globe and went through numerous evolutions and thus represents to true consensus document, submitted by the entire NCUC (to over 70 members, accept 1), while thecompeting cyber-safety petition is to submission of to single organization (CP80) from Utah. > Please to consider signin! g the following statement to indicate your support for the NCSG petition from NCUC. > Civil Joint Society Statement Supporting the NCSG Petition from NCUC: > http://www.ipjustice.org/ICANN/NCSG/NCSG_Charter_Civil_Society_Support.pdf > additional We would be glad to provide any information or toanswer any questions or concerns you may have on the issue. Civil We also request that this society statement not be publicized until it isfinalized and submitted for to ICANN maximum effect. > for Please indicate your support signing this civil society statement before 15 April (which is the deadline for submitting PublicComments) by sending an email to robin(a)ipjustice.org. Thank you very much. > Signed, > The NCUC Executive Committee and GNSO Councilors: > Robin Gross, NCUC Chair > Norbert Klein, NCUC Nominating Committee Representative (Asia) > Carlos Affonso Pereira de Souza, NCUC GNSO Policy Councilor (South America) > Mary Wong, NCUC GNSO Policy Councilor (Asia) > William Drak! e, NCUC GNSO Policy Councilor (Europe) > Carlos Afonso, NCUC E! xecutive Committee Representative (South America) > Horacio Cadiz NCUC Executive Committee Representative (Asia) > Georg Greve, NCUC Executive Committee Representative (Europe) > Robert War, NCUC Executive Committee Representative (North America) > Dave Kissoondoyal, NCUC Executive Committee Representative (Africa) > > Background Information: > Civil Joint Society Statement Supporting the NCSG Petition from NCUC: > http://www.ipjustice.org/ICANN/NCSG/NCSG_Charter_Civil_Society_Support.pdf > NCUC's Petition to Form to Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group: > http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/ncsg-petition-charter.pdf > > Executive Summary/Cover Letter of NCSG Petition from NCUC: > http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/executive-summary-ncsg-proposal.pdf > > Information on ICANN Public Comment for Period Stakeholder Group Petitions: > http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#sg-petitions > > Public Comments Submitted Thus Officers' Club of Revolutionary Armed Forces on Stakehold! er Group Petitions: > http://forum.icann.org/lists/sg-petitions-charters > > IGF/WSIS Internet Governance Caucus Statement Supporting NCUC's NCSG Proposal: > http://forum.icann.org/lists/sg-petitions-charters/msg00009.html > > IP Justice on cyber-safety constituency March on ICANN: > http://ipjustice.org/wp/2009/03/19/robert-yarro-and-his-anti-porn-crusaders… > > Petition from CP80 to form Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group: > http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/ncsg-charter-proposed-by-cybersafety-… > > ICANN Public Comments on CP80's proposed cyber-safety Constituency: > http://forum.icann.org/lists/cyber-safety-petition/ > > Average coverage of proposed cyber-safety constituency: > 4/4/9 IP-Watch: "Special Interests Seeking Power in ICANN's New Stakeholder Group": > http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2009/04/04/special-interests-seeking-power-i…'s-new-stakeholder-group/ > > 3/18/9 Register UK: "Mormons Demand ICANN Plugs Net Smut ! Hole": > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/18/mormons_icann! / > > 3/18/9 CircleID: "ICANN Asked to Remake Internet in Joseph Smith's Image": > http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090318_icann_asked_remake_internet_joseph_s… > > 3/17/9 Internet Governance Project: "CyberSafety or Global Censorship" > http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2009/3/17/4125801.html > > > > > > IP JUSTICE > Robin Gross, Executive Director > 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA The 94117 USA > p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451 > w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: robin(a)ipjustice.org > > > Obtén the best experience in web!< Unloading free the new Internet Explorer 8, http://downloads.yahoo.com/ieak8/?l=e1 > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es_atlarge-list… > > http://www.lacralo.org _________________________________________________________________ Stay up to dates on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Live Windows http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/119462413/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/0b9409a3b8.html --]]

2 1

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =?iso-8859-1?q?gTLD_WG=B4s_Statement_-_Lo_apoyem = =?iso-8859-1?q?os =
by ABAS＠marval.com.ar April 14, 2009

April 14, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?gTLD_WG=B4s_Statement_-_Lo_apoyem = =?iso-8859-1?q?os = From: ABAS(a)marval.com.ar Considered: We are in agreement with the Statement, reason why we suggested its support in ALAC. The document maintains the spirit intact that we decided in the Final Document of the WG3 of the AT-Large in Mexico. A great hug, Agustin Bastanchuri ______________ TO FIX Dear Friends, We agree with the Statement, under we suggest supporting it inthe ALAC. The document remains without changes the idea agreed in the Final Document of the WG3 of the AT-Large in Mexico. Best regards, Agustin Bastanchuri ______________ TO FIX Original -----Mensaje Of: lac-discuss-he is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of Andres Piazza Sent: Monday, 13 of April of 2009 06:53 p.m. It stops: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] gTLD WGŽs Statement - we support It! (English below) Considered, Tomorrow https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?at_large_gtld_working_group_s… in ALAC a period of voting to emit the following document formally Carlos and Jose Ovid do not have instructions precise to emit this vote on the part of LACRALO. Recomiento without doubts that positively leans the document from LACRALO. Surely the members of the WG of will be able to add some commentary which participated. Warm Greetings Andrés Piazza President of LACRALO Dear All, Tomorrow starts to Voting Period in ALAC to make to formal Statement with this Document: https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?at_large_gtld_working_group_s… Carlos and Jose Ovid doesnŽt have specific instruccions from LACRALO to votes. Doubt I suggest that they should give not to their support to the Document. Probably some of the colleagues that took part in the WG and plows members of LACRALO dog add something to the list. Warm Regards, Andrés Piazza LACRALO Chair President PS: The english translation is mines. Literal Is not, but there are, in my opinion, the same sense and message that I wanted to provide. _________________________________________________________________ Stay up to dates on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Live Windows http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/119462413/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/92d070390b.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ¿Comentario de Opennet sobre = =?iso-8859-1?q 22la_nota_europea_del_conjunto_de_las_Telecomunicaciones= " -- para nuestro taller de NN? =
by andrespiazzagpj＠hotmail.com April 14, 2009

April 14, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?=BFComentario_de_Opennet_sobre _ = =?iso-8859-1?q?=22la_nota_europea_del_conjunto_de_las_Telecomunicaciones= =?iso-8859-1?q?=22_ -- _para_nuestro_taller_de_NN=3F = From: andrespiazzagpj(a)hotmail.com Dear Carlton: That situation is really alarming. Although we have not defined an AGENDA for LACRALO (there are contributions and we will consolidate inorder month), this subject (and related others) would conform a "ampleapproach" and, although it in principle does not comprise of our priorities, would be interesting that we pruned to make some uprising. Recomiento to the people who do not comprise of that list of mail, which they are included. Greetings Andrés Piazza President of LACRALO > Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:33:30 -0700 > From: carlton.samuels(a)uwimona.edu.jm > To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > CC: > Subject: Fwd: Commentary of Opennet on "the European note of the assembly of the Telecommunications" -- for our factory of NN? > > > [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]] > > > Subject: Fwd: Commentary of Opennet on "the European note ofthe assembly of the Telecommunications" -- for our factory of NN? > Of: carlton.samuels(a)uwimona.edu.jm > > If this one is the case and purely in principle, would be certainly cause stops > to alarm! > Carlton Samuels > > sent message > Of: Jengibre Paque <gpaque(a)gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 14 of April of 2009 in 7:51 > Subject: [ government ] commentary of Opennet on "European note of the assembly of the Telecommunications" -- > for our factory of NN? >: governance(a)lists.cpsr.org > cubical Centimeter: Milton L Mueller <mueller(a)syr.edu> > > This has certainly global implications. I will have to ! read more on > the "assembly", but it looks like that we must watch in him. > > more better possible, gp > > > > [ FOR IMMEDIATE UNBLOCKING ] > > Opennetcoalition calls for the protection of the European rights of the citizens and the users > in Internet > > the amendments to the "assembly of the Telecommunications" before the European Parliament > the probable means that the users and the citizens of the Internet want not more of length has unmonitored > Access of the Internet > and free access to the Web site of its option. > > * This proposed regime of the EU has many editings of the isolation and the civil rights that is > in opposition to articles 7, 8, 11 and 16 of the letter of the EU of the fundamental one > Rights(1). > * the idea of "3 strikes and you are outside" almost is Stalinist inperspective. > This one is not the Europe that the citizens wish, only the one thatsome politicians > is beginning to construct. > * ISP(2) can decide to what! Web site you can visit, the Website arbitrary could > possib! ly bloqu éese under this regime. You can have to pay to visit more > Web site "nonnative". > * the damage that this one wants this cause to our international reputation is > enormous. > * the financial implications for the citizens and the companies of this filtration > the system will be great, the contributors will have to pay these additional costs. > * Many companies will send their servers of the EU so that they can > continues guaranteeing connectivity. Many others will not beable to export > its products and services > * the propose solutions are essentially vain. > > > the Opennetcoalition is calling simply for the net neutrality and the rights of > protected users who will be respected and. > the function of a ISP is to give its intact message outside and > interference, to the destination, wherever that can be. > > No of this disables the appropriate judicial negligence or any agency that looks for a > specific remedy in the cuts, as for sites and to users! of infraction. > > the specific editings are explained in a number of languagesin our Web site. > > > ### > EXTREME > > Notes: > 1. Seguridad and fundamental Freedoms in the Internet > > 2. ISP: Internet Service Provider > > > > ON Europe wide Opennetcoalition > > > Free Institute Of The Knowledge - Wouter Tebbens > Foundation of the P2P - Celia Blanco and Michel Bauwens > eXgae - Simona Levi > ISOC-ECC - Christopher Wilkinson > Ireland Out of line - Eamonn Wallace > Hispalinux - Jorge Sources > Arbeitskreis Vorratsdatenspeicherung - Ralf Bendrath > Association of Internauts - winning Domingo > E'l-Poli'tica Association of Denmark - Niels Elgaard Larsen > Istituto by dell'Innovazione of him Politiche - Guido Scorza > Associazione Scambio Etico - Paolo Brini > EDRI - Niels Elgaard Larsen > the Quadrature du Net - Jérémie Zimmermann > Abra the Group Of the Rights - Jim Killock > FFII - Alberto Barrionuevo > Center for mediates and the studies! of the communication (CMCS). - Laura Ranca > > > For more ! informat ion on the organization, visits the Europeblackout please > Web site in http://www.blackouteurope.eu > or éntrenos in contact with in blackout.europe(a)gmail.com > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/d8285bf5d6.html > --]] > > > _________________________________________________________________ Get 5 GB of storage with Windows Live Hotmail. http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_5gb_11… _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/d77751f4e3.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: [governance] Opennet comment on European "Telecoms Package" -- note for our NN workshop?
by Carlton Samuels April 14, 2009

April 14, 2009

If this is the case and purely on principle, it certainly would be cause for alarm! Carlton Samuels ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ginger Paque <gpaque(a)gmail.com> Date: Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:51 AM Subject: [governance] Opennet comment on European "Telecoms Package" -- note for our NN workshop? To: governance(a)lists.cpsr.org Cc: Milton L Mueller <mueller(a)syr.edu> This certainly has global implications. I will have to read more about the “package”, but it seems we should look into it. Best, gp [FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE] Opennetcoalition calls for protection of European citizens and users rights on Internet Amendments to the "Telecoms Package" before the European Parliament will likely mean that Internet users and citizens will no longer have unmonitored Internet access and free access to websites of their choice. * This proposed EU regime has many privacy and civil rights issues it is contrary to articles 7, 8, 11 and 16 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights(1). * The idea of "3 strikes and you are out" is almost Stalinist in outlook. This is not the Europe that citizens want, but the one that some politicians are starting to build. * An ISP(2) can decide which website you can visit, arbitrary websites could possibly be blocked under this regime. You may have to pay more to visit "foreign" websites. * The damage this will this cause to our international reputation is enormous. * The financial implications for citizens and companies of this filtering system will be large, taxpayers will have to pay for these additional costs. * Many companies will send their servers out of the EU so that they can continue to guarantee connectivity. Many others will not be able to export their products and services * The proposed solutions are essentially futile. The Opennetcoalition are calling simply for Net Neutrality and the rights of users to be respected and protected. The function of an ISP is to deliver your message intact and without interference, to the destination, wherever that may be. None of this precludes proper judicial oversight or any agencies seeking a specific remedy in the Courts, in respect of infringing sites and users. The specific issues are explained in a number of languages on our website. ### ENDS Notes: 1. Security and Fundamental Freedoms on the Internet 2. ISP : Internet Service Provider ----------------------- ABOUT the Europe wide Opennetcoalition Free Knowledge Institute - Wouter Tebbens P2P Foundation - Celia Blanco and Michel Bauwens eXgae - Simona Levi ISOC-ECC - Christopher Wilkinson Ireland Offline - Eamonn Wallace Hispalinux - Jorge Fuentes Arbeitskreis Vorratsdatenspeicherung - Ralf Bendrath Asociacion de Internautas - Victor Domingo IT-Political Association of Denmark - Niels Elgaard Larsen Istituto per le Politiche dell'Innovazione - Guido Scorza Associazione Scambio Etico - Paolo Brini EDRI - Niels Elgaard Larsen La Quadrature du Net - Jérémie Zimmermann Open Rights Group - Jim Killock FFII - Alberto Barrionuevo Center for Media and Communication Studies (CMCS).- Laura Ranca For more information on the organisation, please visit the Blackout Europe website at http://www.blackouteurope.eu or contact us at blackout.europe(a)gmail.com

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =?iso-8859-1?q?gTLD_WG=B4s_Statement_-_Lo_apoyem = =?iso-8859-1?q?os =
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org April 14, 2009

April 14, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?gTLD_WG=B4s_Statement_-_Lo_apoyem = =?iso-8859-1?q?os = From: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org I agree with the recommendation of the President, support to the document from LACRALO. Warm greetings Dr Alberto Grove Director IIISI www.ibero-americano.org Original Message From: "Andres Piazza" <andrespiazzagpj(a)hotmail.com> To: <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 6:52 P.m. Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] gTLD WGŽs Statement - we support It! (English below) Considered, Tomorrow it takes in ALAC a period of voting to emit formally following document. https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?at_large_gtld_working_group_s… Carlos and Jose Ovid do not have instructions precise to emit this vote on the part of LACRALO. Recomiento without doubts that leans positively document from LACRALO. Surely the members of the WG will be able to add some commentary of ours that participated. Warm Greetings Andrés Piazza President of LACRALO Dear All, Tomorrow starts to Voting Period in ALAC to make to formal Statement with this Document: https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?at_large_gtld_working_group_s… Carlos and Jose Ovid doesnŽt have specific instruccions from LACRALO to vote. Doubt I suggest that they should give not to their support to the Document. Probably some of the colleagues that took part in the WG and plows members of LACRALO dog add something to the list. Warm Regards, Andrés Piazza LACRALO Chair President PS: The english translation is mines. Literal Is not, but you have, in my opinion, the same sense and message that I wanted to provide. _________________________________________________________________ Stay up to dates on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Live Windows http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/119462413/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/ad84bd1a3a.html --]]

1 0