December 2011 - lac-discuss-en

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Happy 2012!
by ainfodata＠gmail.com Dec. 31, 2011

Dec. 31, 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Happy 2012! From: ainfodata(a)gmail.com Hi Everyone! I join Jose's wishes! * A Very Happy 2012 to all! :) * Best regards, Carballo Adrin On December 31, 2011 19:06 JosFrancisco Arce < josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com> escribitbNL> > *Amigos*: > Feliz 2012 para todos !!!!!!!!!!!!!! La mayor de la > felicidades para todos y para toda la region. Que el 2012 nos encuentre mas > unidos y con proyectos en comun. > Muchas bendiciones para sus familias y mucha salud y trabajo !!!!!!! > > :) > > José.- > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4b55f2110b.html --]]

1 0

Happy 2012!
by josefranciscoarce＠gmail.com Dec. 31, 2011

Dec. 31, 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Happy 2012! From: josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com * Friends *: Happy 2012 to all !!!!!!!!!!!!!! Most of the Congratulations to all and for the whole region. That 2012 finds us more united and common projects. Many blessings for their families, and health and work !!!!!!! :) Jos .- _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3607654741.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs
by apisan＠unam.mx Dec. 29, 2011

Dec. 29, 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Fwd: ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs From: apisan(a)unam.mx Sergio, the thing is so severe that I will quote Milton Mueller ... http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2011/12/29/4968272.html makes it very clear I think what I said - and I'm not the only one, and who know me know that for me located on the same side in a cuestin Milton take much. We do not have to share the same view: l has long made clear that his is liberal, not democrtico. We need not "believe" in the benefits of a large increase in the number of gTLDs or few. We must believe in our own processes. If we believe that the process or our principles or interests have been violated in a serious way and decide we have to put even our universe out of ICANN. I do not think debammos to join emprersas corporate interests that had ALL the necessary information and all the opportunities to intervene in the ltimoms conceivable 15 years, even if expressed to travs character of government and institutions join respected by all as the Red Cross or - quizs - the YMCA. The more I think we can do is ask the ICANN Board extreme caution not to give ilegtimos interests and quizs to join the fledgling initiative Avri Doria to establish a surveillance "citizen" on the process, but I think in a more profound ANALYSIS find that it is also something duplicacin who are already agreed processes: ICANN ARE monitoring it, and we have to most relevant to our role in the process insertndonos knowledge and dedication. Alejandro Pisanty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM, University Avenue 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico Ph. +52- (1) -55-5105-6044, +52- (1) -55-5418-3732 * My blog / My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com * LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty * Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org Participate in ICANN, http://www.icann.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of President Internauta Argentina [presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar] Posted on: Wednesdays, December 28, 2011 19:03 To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs Alejandro and all: As I heard ad nauseam habrn much you, I am not in favor of new gTLDs. Grounds on which I base my position is that I am convinced that this is just a few and that business is not profitable for most Internet community (including SMEs and end users), we spent a lot of money and time to discuss, write, theorize and Asked about this, so few take advantage of it and one or two search engine companies generate wealth from its massive utilizacin once installed in the markets these NGTLD. Ningn Todava found no citizen or company not engaged in technology, which tells me that it was imperative to have this or that gTLDs again, until you started with creating a field of marketing need not truthful about this, now warm with fear quizs using the flagship brand of your company as gTLDs, appearing estn Some quizs wanting to see that it is able to capture this and before anyone else, he deserves this name ... pear is far from a "Need for users or businesses" and is very close to the need a few, who see in this poqusimos potential ALGN hidden or manifest in other cases large businesses. To you do not pass the same? had another very different experience you describe it? would be good to know ... On the other hand, I understand that I (we) respect everything done by the two ALAC member of the region that preceded me and the work of ALAC on the subject well validebates, time and effort on this. Despus to express what I think I am suffering more than reasonable doubt on the document of ALAC and to vote, is one of the quizs few times that I am in doubt about what to do and the truth is that would be good to hear other voices on this, someone else quizs opine on what it says ALAC and the debate that is taking place in Right now, it would be good also a view favored one of the ALAC Member above who were involved in the issue NGtld. For now I feel I should abstain. The 29 to vote, missing hours for this. Best Regards * Sergio Salinas Porto Internauta Argentina Association President Argentina Internet Users <http://www.internauta.org.ar> -CTA- <http://www.ctamdq.org.ar> Federacin fluid Latin American Users Internet <http://www.fuilain.org> ICANN / LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook: salinasporto twitter: sergiosalinas MSN / YAHOO MSN / Talk: salinasporto ... Skype: Mobi internautaargentina: +54 215 819 9223 5 * * "Ojalpodamos be disobedient, every time we receive orders that humiliate our conscience or violate our common sense "-Edward Galeano * On 12/27/2011 6:23 a.m., Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch escribitbNL> > José, todos, > > retomo el tema del voto sobre el borrador de llamado de ALAC en relación con los nuevos gTLDs. > > Es de importancia leer los comentarios que otros han vertido en la página Web en la que se consigna el borrador,https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/Updated+ALAC+adv… con contribuciones de personas como Avri Doria. > > El contexto actual más amplio viene dado por las voces fundamentalmente de EU - privadas y públicas - que se han expresado a favor de que ICANN altere radicalmente los acuerdos alcanzados hasta ahora y vuelva sustancialmente más lento el ingreso de nuevos gTLDs. El diario New York Times editorializa al respecto y habla de una prueba piloto. > > Si ven las contribuciones de colegas como Bret Fausett y otros, en Twitter por ejemplo, y las que ya mecioné en la página de la propuesta, algunos de Uds. pueden llegar a la conclusión de que votar a favor del borrador de ALAC es negar la historia de participación de nuestras organizaciones en el largo proceso de apertura de gTLDs. Quienes hemos tenido enormes reservas, quienes se han opuesto plenamente, y quienes lo han impulsado hemos tenido todas las oportunidades para darle forma y proponer, en particular, un ingreso más gradual de gTLDs que el que se prevé en el programa que empieza en unos 15 o 20 días. > > Pienso por ello que hay que tener argumentos muy claros para hacer un esfuerzo en la última trinchera para bajarse del carro y oponerse a su avance. Los puede haber pero deben ser NUESTROS argumentos, imbuidos por esa larga historia. > > ¿Los hay? ¿Cuáles son? ¿Quiénes los expresan? > > Alejandro Pisanty > > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 > > *Mi blog/My blog:http://pisanty.blogspot.com > *LinkedIn profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > *Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > *Twitter:http://twitter.com/apisanty > ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico,http://www.isoc.org > Participa en ICANN,http://www.icann.org > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > ________________________________________ > Desde:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] en nombre de José Francisco Arce [josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com] > Enviado el: jueves, 22 de diciembre de 2011 15:21 > Hasta: Natalia Enciso > CC: LACRALO Español > Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs > > *Estimados*: > La unica herramienta actual que permite la mejor > comunicacion en los dos idiomas es la lista de LACRALO, por tener > traduccion instantanea (con sus aciertos y ....). Pero queda abierto el > dialogo para propuestas nuevas como la de Sergio para que debatamos si son > mejores o no. Mientras tanto y como no queda mucho tiempo para este tema > usemos la lista. > > Saludos > > José Arce.- > > > 2011/12/21 Natalia Enciso<natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com> > >> Buenos días: >> >> En la llamada mensual de ALAC del día de ayer se pidió que se discuta en >> cada RALO sobre el ALAC STATEMENT ON THE NEW GTLDS. >> >> Habrá una llamada de ALAC el 6 de enero de 2012 donde se tratará el tema. >> >> En la lista se estuvo discutiendo sobre el tema, especificamente sobre >> "interés público". >> Sería bueno que se genere un debate en la lista para poder llevar la >> opinion de LACRALO a esa llamada. >> >> Saludos, >> >> Natalia >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: ICANN At-Large Staff<staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> >> Date: 2011/12/20 >> Subject: [ALAC-Announce] ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs >> To:"alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" < >> alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff<staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> >> >> >> Dear All, >> >> >> Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has requested that the following >> message be sent to the ALAC Announce mailing list: >> >> >> Further to today's ALAC call<https://community.icann.org/x/AQrPAQ>, where >> Evan Leibovitch presented a motion for an ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs, >> I encourage you to read through< >> >> https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/Updated+ALAC+advice+on+gT… >> the Statement<https://community.icann.org/x/AYfbAQ> and discuss it within >> your regional lists. >> >> >> Additional information about the Statement can be found on the Updated ALAC >> Advice on gTLDs Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/AYfbAQ>. >> >> Regards, >> >> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie >> Peregrine >> ICANN At-Large Staff >> E-mail:staff@atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ALAC-Announce mailing list >> ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce >> >> At-Large Official Site:http://www.atlarge.icann.org >> >> >> >> -- >> natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com >> _______________________________________________ >> lac-discuss-es mailing list >> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> >> http://www.lacralo.org >> > > -- > Ab. Arce, Jose Francisco > + 54 9 351 6788920 > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b59277c28f.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs
by presidencia＠internauta.org.ar Dec. 29, 2011

Dec. 29, 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Fwd: ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs From: presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar Alejandro and all: As I heard ad nauseam habrn much you, I am not in favor of new gTLDs. Grounds on which I base my position is that I am convinced that this is just a few and that business is not profitable for most Internet community (including SMEs and end users), we spent a lot of money and time to discuss, write, theorize and Asked about this, so few take advantage of it and one or two search engine companies generate wealth from its massive utilizacin once installed in the markets these NGTLD. Ningn Todava found no citizen or company not engaged in technology, which tells me that it was imperative to have this or that gTLDs again, until you started with creating a field of marketing need not truthful about this, now warm with fear quizs using the flagship brand of your company as gTLDs, appearing estn Some quizs wanting to see that it is able to capture this and before anyone else, he deserves this name ... pear is far from a "Need for users or businesses" and is very close to the need a few, who see in this poqusimos potential ALGN hidden or manifest in other cases large businesses. To you do not pass the same? had another very different experience you describe it? would be good to know ... On the other hand, I understand that I (we) respect everything done by the two ALAC member of the region that preceded me and the work of ALAC on the subject well validebates, time and effort on this. Despus to express what I think I am suffering more than reasonable doubt on the document of ALAC and to vote, is one of the quizs few times that I am in doubt about what to do and the truth is that would be good to hear other voices on this, someone else quizs opine on what it says ALAC and the debate that is taking place in Right now, it would be good also a view favored one of the ALAC Member above who were involved in the issue NGtld. For now I feel I should abstain. The 29 to vote, missing hours for this. Best Regards * Sergio Salinas Porto Internauta Argentina Association President Argentina Internet Users <http://www.internauta.org.ar> -CTA- <http://www.ctamdq.org.ar> Federacin fluid Latin American Users Internet <http://www.fuilain.org> ICANN / LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook: salinasporto twitter: sergiosalinas MSN / YAHOO MSN / Talk: salinasporto ... Skype: Mobi internautaargentina: +54 215 819 9223 5 * * "Ojalpodamos be disobedient, every time we receive orders that humiliate our conscience or violate our common sense "-Edward Galeano * On 12/27/2011 6:23 a.m., Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch escribitbNL> > José, todos, > > retomo el tema del voto sobre el borrador de llamado de ALAC en relación con los nuevos gTLDs. > > Es de importancia leer los comentarios que otros han vertido en la página Web en la que se consigna el borrador,https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/Updated+ALAC+adv… con contribuciones de personas como Avri Doria. > > El contexto actual más amplio viene dado por las voces fundamentalmente de EU - privadas y públicas - que se han expresado a favor de que ICANN altere radicalmente los acuerdos alcanzados hasta ahora y vuelva sustancialmente más lento el ingreso de nuevos gTLDs. El diario New York Times editorializa al respecto y habla de una prueba piloto. > > Si ven las contribuciones de colegas como Bret Fausett y otros, en Twitter por ejemplo, y las que ya mecioné en la página de la propuesta, algunos de Uds. pueden llegar a la conclusión de que votar a favor del borrador de ALAC es negar la historia de participación de nuestras organizaciones en el largo proceso de apertura de gTLDs. Quienes hemos tenido enormes reservas, quienes se han opuesto plenamente, y quienes lo han impulsado hemos tenido todas las oportunidades para darle forma y proponer, en particular, un ingreso más gradual de gTLDs que el que se prevé en el programa que empieza en unos 15 o 20 días. > > Pienso por ello que hay que tener argumentos muy claros para hacer un esfuerzo en la última trinchera para bajarse del carro y oponerse a su avance. Los puede haber pero deben ser NUESTROS argumentos, imbuidos por esa larga historia. > > ¿Los hay? ¿Cuáles son? ¿Quiénes los expresan? > > Alejandro Pisanty > > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 > > *Mi blog/My blog:http://pisanty.blogspot.com > *LinkedIn profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > *Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > *Twitter:http://twitter.com/apisanty > ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico,http://www.isoc.org > Participa en ICANN,http://www.icann.org > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > ________________________________________ > Desde:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] en nombre de José Francisco Arce [josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com] > Enviado el: jueves, 22 de diciembre de 2011 15:21 > Hasta: Natalia Enciso > CC: LACRALO Español > Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs > > *Estimados*: > La unica herramienta actual que permite la mejor > comunicacion en los dos idiomas es la lista de LACRALO, por tener > traduccion instantanea (con sus aciertos y ....). Pero queda abierto el > dialogo para propuestas nuevas como la de Sergio para que debatamos si son > mejores o no. Mientras tanto y como no queda mucho tiempo para este tema > usemos la lista. > > Saludos > > José Arce.- > > > 2011/12/21 Natalia Enciso<natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com> > >> Buenos días: >> >> En la llamada mensual de ALAC del día de ayer se pidió que se discuta en >> cada RALO sobre el ALAC STATEMENT ON THE NEW GTLDS. >> >> Habrá una llamada de ALAC el 6 de enero de 2012 donde se tratará el tema. >> >> En la lista se estuvo discutiendo sobre el tema, especificamente sobre >> "interés público". >> Sería bueno que se genere un debate en la lista para poder llevar la >> opinion de LACRALO a esa llamada. >> >> Saludos, >> >> Natalia >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: ICANN At-Large Staff<staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> >> Date: 2011/12/20 >> Subject: [ALAC-Announce] ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs >> To:"alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" < >> alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff<staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> >> >> >> Dear All, >> >> >> Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has requested that the following >> message be sent to the ALAC Announce mailing list: >> >> >> Further to today's ALAC call<https://community.icann.org/x/AQrPAQ>, where >> Evan Leibovitch presented a motion for an ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs, >> I encourage you to read through< >> >> https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/Updated+ALAC+advice+on+gT… >> the Statement<https://community.icann.org/x/AYfbAQ> and discuss it within >> your regional lists. >> >> >> Additional information about the Statement can be found on the Updated ALAC >> Advice on gTLDs Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/AYfbAQ>. >> >> Regards, >> >> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie >> Peregrine >> ICANN At-Large Staff >> E-mail:staff@atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ALAC-Announce mailing list >> ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce >> >> At-Large Official Site:http://www.atlarge.icann.org >> >> >> >> -- >> natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com >> _______________________________________________ >> lac-discuss-es mailing list >> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> >> http://www.lacralo.org >> > > -- > Ab. Arce, Jose Francisco > + 54 9 351 6788920 > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/73d3d78d9f.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Windows-1252? Q? Fwd 3A_ = = = 5D_VOTE 5BALAC-Announce? = =? Windows-1252? Q? _ANNOUNCEMENT = 3A_ALAC_Statement_on_the_Preliminary_Issue? = =? Windows-1252? Q? _Report_on_ = 8CThick = B9_Whois? =
by apisan＠unam.mx Dec. 28, 2011

Dec. 28, 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =? Windows-1252? Q? Fwd 3A_ = = = 5D_VOTE 5BALAC-Announce? = =? Windows-1252? Q? _ANNOUNCEMENT = 3A_ALAC_Statement_on_the_Preliminary_Issue? = =? Windows-1252? Q? _Report_on_ = 8CThick = B9_Whois? = From: apisan(a)unam.mx Hi all, I have reviewed the proposal of Natalia, and the contributions made jointly by Natalia, Fátima and Rachel at the website whois discusin on thin or thick and the initiation of a PDP in this regard. I join the Jacqueline Morris has said in praise of this participation: three colleagues give evidence of knowledge and maturity that are themselves evidence of the effects of the program of "Fellowships" when / talented participants own undertake the work. So I agree with Carlos, Jacqueline, Alberto and others with a vote of support for the way they vote in the ALAC, yaad a vote of confidence to its participation. A SPECIFIC point: I do not exclude the PDP discusin the subject of a unique access to the whois information for thin and thick logs.Although discusin so far suggest that it is of low profit and difcil to reach, and creates significant risks Segno some possible implementations that create a rich asset information and exposed unnecessarily, I think being ANALYSIS be better if done within the PDP. In addition the cost of starting and running a PDP is high and can agree that, without losing focus and being too general and vague, the more possible aspects scontemple compatible with your PURPOSE. If something could be ordered for the future is that ANALYSIS In addition the technician, excellent, they have provided, they could share with the rest of LACRALO a note about who they are entities or What Are the forces that an initiative drive and sta oposicina it. It is not always easy and can not always do this in public, that is. Best regards. Alejandro Pisanty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM, University Avenue 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico Ph. +52- (1) -55-5105-6044, +52- (1) -55-5418-3732 * My blog / My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com * LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty * Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org Participate in ICANN, http://www.icann.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Natalia Enciso [natalia.enciso @ gmail.com] Posted on: Monday, December 26, 2011 7:55 To: LACRALO Espaol Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Preliminary Report on Thick Whois Issue Good days! Merry Christmas. Returning to the vote: Are saying about the declaration is drawn on HHOIS? Someone has something against? Regards, Natali ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Date: 2011/12/24 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Preliminary Report on Thick Whois Issue To: "alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" < alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Dear All, Olivier Crpin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, you Asked That a vote be Held on the proposed "ALAC Statement on the Preliminary Issue Report on Thick Whois < https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/30345624/ALAC+Statement+on…>" for communication to the relevant parties. ***** Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement on the Issue Preliminary Report on Thick Whois < https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/30345624/ALAC+Statement+on…>" for communication to the relevant parties? ***** Additional information On this Statement Can be found on the At-Large Issue Preliminary Report on Thick Whois Workspace < https://community.icann.org/x/mAnPAQ>. PLEASE NOTE THAT the poll Will Be open from 24-Dec-2011 21:00 UTC to 30-Dec-2011 12:00 UTC. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie Peregrine ICANN At-Large Staff E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4364656bf9.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs
by apisan＠unam.mx Dec. 27, 2011

Dec. 27, 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Fwd: ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs From: apisan(a)unam.mx Jos, all return to the issue of vote on draft ALAC called relationship with the new gTLDs. It's important to read the comments others have poured into the web page that is recorded in the draft, https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/Updated+ALAC+advice+on+gT… Ms wide current context is given by the EU mainly voices - Private and public - who have spoken in favor of radically altering ICANN agreements reached so far and then substantially more slow the entry of new gTLDs. The New York Times editorializes about it and talk about a pilot. If you look at the contributions of colleagues like Bret Fausett and others on Twitter for example, and already the man page that referred the proposal, some of you may reach the conclusin that voting in favor of the draft ALAC is to deny the history of our organizations for participation in the long process of opening the gTLDs.Those who have had huge reserves, who have opposed full, and those who have driven all the opportunities we have to shape and propose, in particular, a more gradual entry of gTLDs than is envisaged in the program that begins in about 15 or 20 DAS. I think why it should be very clear arguments to make a last ditch effort to get off the truck and oppose their progress. The can be but should be our arguments, imbued with that long history. Any? What Are? Quines express them? Alejandro Pisanty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM, University Avenue 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico Ph. +52- (1) -55-5105-6044, +52- (1) -55-5418-3732 * My blog / My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com * LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty * Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org Participate in ICANN, http://www.icann.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Maple JosFrancisco [josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com] Posted on: Thursday, December 22, 2011 15:21 To: Natalia Enciso CC: LACRALO Espaol Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs * Dear *: The only current tool that allows the best communication in both languages \u200b\u200bis the list of LACRALO, having Instant translation (with its successes and ....). But it remains open dialogue for new proposals such as Sergio for us to discuss if better or not.Meanwhile, and as not much time for this topic we use the list. Regards JosArce .- Natalia Enciso 2011/12/21 <natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com> > Buenos días: > > En la llamada mensual de ALAC del día de ayer se pidió que se discuta en > cada RALO sobre el ALAC STATEMENT ON THE NEW GTLDS. > > Habrá una llamada de ALAC el 6 de enero de 2012 donde se tratará el tema. > > En la lista se estuvo discutiendo sobre el tema, especificamente sobre > "interés público". > Sería bueno que se genere un debate en la lista para poder llevar la > opinion de LACRALO a esa llamada. > > Saludos, > > Natalia > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > Date: 2011/12/20 > Subject: [ALAC-Announce] ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs > To: "alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" < > alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > > > Dear All, > > > Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has requested that the following > message be sent to the ALAC Announce mailing list: > > > Further to today's ALAC call<https://community.icann.org/x/AQrPAQ>, where > Evan Leibovitch presented a motion for an ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs, > I encourage you to read through < > > https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/Updated+ALAC+advice+on+gT… > > > the Statement<https://community.icann.org/x/AYfbAQ> and discuss it within > your regional lists. > > > Additional information about the Statement can be found on the Updated ALAC > Advice on gTLDs Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/AYfbAQ>. > > Regards, > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie > Peregrine > ICANN At-Large Staff > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > > > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC-Announce mailing list > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce > > At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > > > > -- > natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > Ab. Arce, Jose Francisco + 54 9 351 6788920 _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/19b8f23ce8.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Geographic Regions Review
by salgueiro.jo＠gmail.com Dec. 26, 2011

Dec. 26, 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Fwd: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Geographic Regions Review From: salgueiro.jo(a)gmail.com I agree with both statements JOS ----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Natalia Enciso Posted on: Monday, December 26, 2011 9:58 a.m. To: LACRALO Espaol Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Geographic Regions Review Tomorrow is the deadline to vote on the declaration on regions Geographical and 29 on IDN. Someone has something against? ***** Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement on the Geographic Regions Review < https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/28902425/ALAC+Statement+on+ Geographic + Regions + the + Review.pdf? version = 1 & modificationDate = 1324340928877> " for communication to the relevant Public Comment process? ***** Additional information On this Statement Can be found on the At-Large Geographic Regions Review Workspace < https://community.icann.org/x/GQS5AQ>. PLEASE NOTE THAT the poll Will Be open from 19-Dec-2011 23:59 UTC to 27-Dec-2011 23:59 UTC. ****** Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement on the GNSO and ccNSO Joint Working Group on Single Character IDN TLDs < https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/30344109/JIG+Response+ ICANN Board to + + + Resolution + on + Single + TLDs CharacterIDN + + - + final.pdf? version = 2 & ModificationDate = 1321316028000> "* * For communication to the relevant parties? ***** Additional information On this Statement Can be found on the At-Large Workspace ccNSO and GNSO for Joint Working Group on Single Character IDN TLDs - November 2011 < https://community.icann.org/x/rQPPAQ>. PLEASE NOTE THAT the poll Will Be open from * 22-Dec-2011 21:00 UTC * to * 29-Dec-2011 29:00 UTC ** *. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie Peregrine ICANN At-Large Staff - natalia.enciso @ gmail.com _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/16027ccc15.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Windows-1252? Q? Fwd 3A_ = = = 5D_VOTE 5BALAC-advertised? = =? Windows-1252? Q? _ANNOUNCEMENT = 3A_ALAC_Statement_on_the_Preliminar? = =? Windows-1252? Q? 8CThick B9_Whois Y_Issue_Report_on_ =? =
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org Dec. 26, 2011

Dec. 26, 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =? Windows-1252? Q? Fwd 3A_ = = = 5D_VOTE 5BALAC-advertised? = =? Windows-1252? Q? _ANNOUNCEMENT = 3A_ALAC_Statement_on_the_Preliminar? = =? Windows-1252? Q? 8CThick B9_Whois Y_Issue_Report_on_ =? = From: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org Okay. Alberto Soto ----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com Posted on: Monday, December 26, 2011 24:15 To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Windows-1252? Q? Fwd 3A_ = = = 5D_VOTE 5BALAC-advertised? = =? Windows-1252? Q? _ANNOUNCEMENT = 3A_ALAC_Statement_on_the_Preliminar? = =? Windows-1252? Q? 8CThick B9_Whois Y_Issue_Report_on_ =? = [[- Translated text (in -> is )--]] Subject: Re: =? Windows-1252? Q? Fwd 3A_ = = = 5D_VOTE 5BALAC-advertised? = =? Windows-1252? Q?_ANNOUNCEMENT = 3A_ALAC_Statement_on_the_Preliminar? = =? Windows-1252? Q? 8CThick B9_Whois Y_Issue_Report_on_ =? = Starting from: josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com + 1 12/26/2011 Carlos Dionisio Aguirre <carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com> > > + 1 > > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > NCA GNSO Council - ICANN > former ALAC member by LACRALO > Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios Sarmiento 71 - 4to. > 18 Cordoba - Argentina - > *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > > > Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 10:35:51 -0400 > > From: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com > > To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Windows-1252? Q? Fwd 3A_ = = = > > 5D_VOTE > 5BALAC-Announce? = =? Windows-1252? Q? _ANNOUNCEMENT = > 3A_ALAC_Statement_on_the_Preliminar? = =? Windows-1252? Q? > Y_Issue_Report_on_ = 8CThick = B9_Whois? = > > > > I think that the statement sent by yourself, Fatima and Raquel was > excellent. > > I agree that the PDP should be opened - all the issues that were > > raised in the discussion will be thoroughly thrashed out during the > > process. > > So, yes on the statement. > > > > Jacqueline A. Morris > > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible > > and Free. (after Chris Lehmann ) > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 9:56 AM, <natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > > > > > Subject: =? Windows-1252? Q? Fwd 3A_ = = = 5D_VOTE > > > 5BALAC-Announce? = > =? Windows-1252? Q? _ANNOUNCEMENT = > 3A_ALAC_Statement_on_the_Preliminar? = =? Windows-1252? Q? > Y_Issue_Report_on_ = 8CThick = B9_Whois? = > > > From: natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com > > > > > > Good days! Merry Christmas. > > > > > > > > > Returning to the vote: > > > Are saying about the declaration is drawn on HHOIS? Someone has > something against? > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Natali > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > > > Date: 2011/12/24 > > > Subject: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the > > > Preliminary Report on Thick Whois Issue > > > To: "alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" < > > > alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > > Olivier Crpin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, you Asked That a vote > > > be > Held on > > > the proposed "ALAC Statement on the Preliminary Issue Report on > > > Thick Whois < > > > > https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/30345624/ALAC+Stateme > nt+on+the+Preliminary+Issue+Report+on+%E2%80%98Thick%E2%80%99+Whois.pd > f > >" > > > for communication to the relevant parties. > > > > > > > > > ***** > > > Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement > > > on > the > > > Issue Preliminary Report on Thick Whois < > > > > https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/30345624/ALAC+Stateme > nt+on+the+Preliminary+Issue+Report+on+%E2%80%98Thick%E2%80%99+Whois.pd > f > >" > > > for communication to the relevant parties? > > > ***** > > > > > > > > > Additional information On this Statement Can be found on the > > > At-Large Issue Preliminary Report on Thick Whois Workspace < > > > https://community.icann.org/x/mAnPAQ>. > > > > > > > > > PLEASE NOTE THAT the poll Will Be open from 24-Dec-2011 21:00 UTC > > > to > > > 30-Dec-2011 12:00 UTC. > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and > Nathalie > > > Peregrine > > > ICANN At-Large Staff > > > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/90b06fdc20.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] [lac-discuss-es] =? Windows-1252? Q? Fwd 3A_ = = = 5D_VOTE 5BALAC-anuncian? = =? Windows-1252? Q? _ANNOUNCEMENT = 3A_ALAC_Statement_on_the_Preliminar? = =? Windows-1252? Q? Y_Issue_Report_on_ = = 8CThick B9_Whois? =
by Alberto Soto Dec. 26, 2011

Dec. 26, 2011

De acuerdo. Alberto Soto -----Mensaje original----- De: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com Enviado el: lunes, 26 de diciembre de 2011 12:15 p.m. Para: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] =? Windows-1252? Q? Fwd 3A_ = = = 5D_VOTE 5BALAC-anuncian? = =? Windows-1252? Q? _ANNOUNCEMENT = 3A_ALAC_Statement_on_the_Preliminar? = =? Windows-1252? Q? Y_Issue_Report_on_ = = 8CThick B9_Whois? = [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: =? Windows-1252? Q? Fwd 3A_ = = = 5D_VOTE 5BALAC-anuncian? = =? Windows-1252? Q? _ANNOUNCEMENT = 3A_ALAC_Statement_on_the_Preliminar? = =? Windows-1252? Q? Y_Issue_Report_on_ = = 8CThick B9_Whois? = A partir de: josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com + 1 12/26/2011 Carlos Dionisio Aguirre <carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com> > > + 1 > > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > NCA GNSO Council - ICANN > former ALAC member by LACRALO > Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios Sarmiento 71 - 4to. > 18 Cordoba - Argentina - > *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > > > Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 10:35:51 -0400 > > From: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com > > To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Windows-1252? Q? Fwd 3A_ = = = > > 5D_VOTE > 5BALAC-Announce? = =? Windows-1252? Q? _ANNOUNCEMENT = > 3A_ALAC_Statement_on_the_Preliminar? = =? Windows-1252? Q? > Y_Issue_Report_on_ = 8CThick = B9_Whois? = > > > > I think that the statement sent by yourself, Fatima and Raquel was > excellent. > > I agree that the PDP should be opened - all the issues that were > > raised in the discussion will be thoroughly thrashed out during the > > process. > > So, yes on the statement. > > > > Jacqueline A. Morris > > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible > > and Free. (after Chris Lehmann ) > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 9:56 AM, <natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > > > > > Subject: =? Windows-1252? Q? Fwd 3A_ = = = 5D_VOTE > > > 5BALAC-Announce? = > =? Windows-1252? Q? _ANNOUNCEMENT = > 3A_ALAC_Statement_on_the_Preliminar? = =? Windows-1252? Q? > Y_Issue_Report_on_ = 8CThick = B9_Whois? = > > > From: natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com > > > > > > Good days! Merry Christmas. > > > > > > > > > Returning to the vote: > > > Are saying about the declaration is drawn on HHOIS? Someone has > something against? > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Natali > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > > > Date: 2011/12/24 > > > Subject: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the > > > Preliminary Report on Thick Whois Issue > > > To: "alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" < > > > alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > > Olivier Crpin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, you Asked That a vote > > > be > Held on > > > the proposed "ALAC Statement on the Preliminary Issue Report on > > > Thick Whois < > > > > https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/30345624/ALAC+Stateme > nt+on+the+Preliminary+Issue+Report+on+%E2%80%98Thick%E2%80%99+Whois.pd > f > >" > > > for communication to the relevant parties. > > > > > > > > > ***** > > > Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement > > > on > the > > > Issue Preliminary Report on Thick Whois < > > > > https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/30345624/ALAC+Stateme > nt+on+the+Preliminary+Issue+Report+on+%E2%80%98Thick%E2%80%99+Whois.pd > f > >" > > > for communication to the relevant parties? > > > ***** > > > > > > > > > Additional information On this Statement Can be found on the > > > At-Large Issue Preliminary Report on Thick Whois Workspace < > > > https://community.icann.org/x/mAnPAQ>. > > > > > > > > > PLEASE NOTE THAT the poll Will Be open from 24-Dec-2011 21:00 UTC > > > to > > > 30-Dec-2011 12:00 UTC. > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and > Nathalie > > > Peregrine > > > ICANN At-Large Staff > > > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6b66f169ad.html --]] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org

1 0

Carlos has left a message ...
by carlosaguirre62＠hotmail.com Dec. 26, 2011

Dec. 26, 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Carlos has left a message ... From: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com Carlos has left a message ... Slo tpodrs see both the message and its sender and you can delete it at any time. You can respond to chat travs Badoo. To read your message, click on the link below: http://eu1.badoo.com/075244364/in/E8Y90onTkf4/?lang_id=7&m=21&mid=4… Ms estesperando you people who also: Janet (Córdoba, Argentina) Cyncba (Córdoba, Argentina) Chomba (Córdoba, Argentina) http://eu1.badoo.com/075244364/in/E8Y90onTkf4/?lang_id=7&m=21&mid=4… If you click on the link in this message does not work, copy ypgalo in your browser toolbar. This email is part of the delivery of the message sent by Carlos. If you have received this email in error, please ignralo. In a short period of time, the system sereliminada peticin. Divrtete! Badoo Team You received this email because a Badoo user has left a message on Badoo. This email has been generated so automatically. Please do not reply to this message and not recibirs any response. If you will not receive more messages from Badoo, indcanoslo: _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d888755935.html --]]

1 0