April 2010 - lac-discuss-en

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =?iso-8859-1?q?Declaraci=F3n_de_ALAC_sobre_la_ap = =?iso-8859-1?q?licaci=F3n_del_ICM_para_el_sTLD_del_XXX =
by salgueiro.jo＠gmail.com April 29, 2010

April 29, 2010

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?Declaraci=F3n_de_ALAC_sobre_la_ap = =?iso-8859-1?q?licaci=F3n_del_ICM_para_el_sTLD_del_XXX = From: salgueiro.jo(a)gmail.com I do not find the Link to arrive at the declaration of ALAC, single encounter the notes of the Board JOS Original -----Mensaje Of: lac-discuss-it is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of Andrés Piazza Sent: Tuesday, 27 of April of 2010 05:52 p.m. It stops: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] Declaration of ALAC on the application of the ICM for sTLD of the XXX Obvious also I agree. Andrés Sent from BlackBerry® -----Original Message From: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:17:30 To: <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> subject:Re: Declaration of ALAC on the application of the ICM for sTLDof XXX [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]] Subject: Re: Declaration of ALAC on the application of the ICMfor sTLD of XXX Of: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com It sounds good for me. In Right of NegociosSarmiento 71 of Carlos Dionisio AguirreAbogado - of Specialist - 4to. 18 Cordova - Argentina - * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 to www.derechoytecnologia.com.ar http://ar.ageiadensi.org > date: Tue, the 27 Of April 2010 16:44:42 Of -0400 > of: admin(a)ttcsweb.org > a: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > subject: [ lacquer-discuss-lac-discuss-in ] Declaration of ALAC on the application of ICM for sTLD of XXX > > wanted all, > > the declaration of sketch ALAC ignited on the application of the ICM for sTLD of the XXX > can be > found in http://bit.ly/duKKCq > I suggest LACRALO to endorse this declaration of ALAC and does not put under > regional declaration separated > > > respect, > > Revealing Anand Teelucksingh > > _______________________________________________ > list that itsends lacquer-discuss-lac-discuss-in > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en_atlarge-lists icann.org _________________________________________________________________ With Hotmail of the meeting of the one of OrganizÃ¡: email to send of of podÃ©s a date to agendar with of the the one of the Calendar of the friends and your. More of I discovered. http://www.microsoft.com/latam/windows/windowslive/products/calendar.aspx _______________________________________________ [ [ - - Original text (in) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8b1aÃš52b6.html --]] _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3ab8c61758.html --]]

2 1

ALAC statement on ICM Application for the .XXX sTLD
by Dev Anand Teelucksingh April 28, 2010

April 28, 2010

Dear all, The draft ALAC statement on on ICM Application for the .XXX sTLD can be found at http://bit.ly/duKKCq I suggest that LACRALO should endorse this ALAC statement and not submit a separate regional statement. Regards, Dev Anand Teelucksingh

3 2

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =?windows-1252?q?Declaraci=F3n_de_ALAC_sobre_la _ = =?windows-1252?q?aplicaci=F3n_del_ICM_para_el_sTLD_del_XXX =
by andrespiazzagpj＠hotmail.com April 27, 2010

April 27, 2010

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?windows-1252?q?Declaraci=F3n_de_ALAC_sobre_la _ = =?windows-1252?q?aplicaci=F3n_del_ICM_para_el_sTLD_del_XXX = From: andrespiazzagpj(a)hotmail.com Obvious also I agree. Andrés Sent from BlackBerry® -----Original Message From: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:17:30 To: <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> subject:Re: Declaration of ALAC on the application of the ICM for sTLDof the XXX [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]] Subject: Re: Declaration of ALAC on the application of the ICMfor sTLD of the XXX Of: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com It sounds good for me. In Right of NegociosSarmiento 71 of Carlos Dionisio AguirreAbogado - of Specialist - 4to. 18 Cordova - Argentina - * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 to www.derechoytecnologia.com.ar http://ar.ageiadensi.org > date: Tue, the 27 Of April 2010 16:44:42 Of -0400 > of: admin(a)ttcsweb.org > a: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > subject: [ lacquer-discuss-lac-discuss-in ] Declaration of ALAC on theapplication of the ICM for sTLD of XXX > > wanted all, > > the declaration of sketch ALAC ignited on the application of the ICM for sTLD of the XXX can be > found in http://bit.ly/duKKCq > > I suggest LACRALO to endorse this declaration of ALAC and > does not put under >separated regional declaration > > respect, > > Revealing Anand Teelucksingh > > _______________________________________________ > list that sends lacquer-discuss-lac-discuss-in > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en_atlarge-list… _________________________________________________________________ With Hotmail of the meeting of the one of OrganizÃ¡: email to send of of podÃ©s a date to agendar with of the the one of the Calendar of the friends and your. More of I discovered. http://www.microsoft.com/latam/windows/windowslive/products/calendar.aspx _______________________________________________ [ [ - - Original text (in) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8b1aÃš52b6.html --]] _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/999dd89f9f.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ALAC statement on ICM Application for the .XXX sTLD
by Jacqueline A. Morris April 27, 2010

April 27, 2010

I agree with the ALAC statement. ------Original Message------ From: Dev Anand Teelucksingh Sender: lac-discuss-en-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org To: LACRALO discussion list Subject: [lac-discuss-en] ALAC statement on ICM Application for the .XXX sTLD Sent: 27 Apr 2010 16:44 Dear all, The draft ALAC statement on on ICM Application for the .XXX sTLD can be found at http://bit.ly/duKKCq I suggest that LACRALO should endorse this ALAC statement and not submit a separate regional statement. Regards, Dev Anand Teelucksingh _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en_atlarge-list… Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device available from bmobile.

1 0

Automated Translation for LACRALO Discuss List
by Carlton Samuels April 26, 2010

April 26, 2010

I have been struggling to follow the arguments on both sides in the recent upsurge of discussions on one or other subjects. It seems that as the posts become longer, our translation engine seems to become even more idiosyncratic. Longer posts tend to record more subtle variations in posture, which makes the translations that more important. And translations are ever more important for the archives. We must have another look at the translation tools. Carlton Samuels

2 1

Fw: More on .co Developments
by Carlton Samuels April 26, 2010

April 26, 2010

You might find this of interest to the ongoing discussion. http://www.circleid.com/posts/20100420_co_domain_unprecedented_rights_prote… <http://www.circleid.com/posts/20100420_co_domain_unprecedented_rights_prote…> Carlton

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =?iso-8859-1?q?=5Blac-discuss-en=5D=09=BFPodr=ED = =?iso-8859-1?q?a_usted_clarificar=3F =
by carlosaguirre62＠hotmail.com April 26, 2010

April 26, 2010

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5Blac-discuss-en=5D=09=BFPodr=ED = =?iso-8859-1?q?a_usted_clarificar=3F = From: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com Dear Johny. For a long time we have been coming trying, Next toLideres regional (Andres, Dev and Carlton before them), to establish conversations with the direction of the LACTLD. It until now has been impossible and by the particular conduction that the organism has and of which I also have particularly one vision negative since the same one, for my, is moved by interests different from those from the usersof the region. Despite it always there are instances of I engage in a dialog that they are to try. In fact in ALAC we are leading (I personally and Andres Piazza like regional Chair) next to Rudi Vansnick (be ccTTLD and ALAC - ccNSO liaision), the possibility of beginning I engage in a dialog usuary - ccTLD's, for which a survey has been processed that has been turned to all you lead them of ALS's of the five regions so that they complete it (nonmemory who You, you have done it until now), and to begin with it the work of being able to approach the parts. As You side we are working, although the difference of visions and objectives between the parts (dirigentes)y often prevents the encounter. My annoyance did not have anything to do with this in which we agreed,at least until aqui. My Annoyance was motivated by the lack of answer on the part of Our Colombian ALS's to the questions that many haciamosus with relation to co and that we even continued having. Ademas Vtra appearance in a scene that is not to him habitual making defense of that was not attacked but only interbare, I am (at least for my) extrano. I believe that reunion of sera Cartagena an excellent excuse to be able to talk in depth this and other subjects that worry in the regionand ojala to us we pruned to count on the participation and commitmentof all the ALS's to obtain a result that until now is aloof and in which it has much to sometimes do the lack of commitment of many of the credited organizations but who they do not have attendance none inthe teleconferencings and much less commitment of work in the own tasks of LACRALO, ALAC and ICANN. Him greeting and I invite to add itself to desafio of the work in own questions of politica of ICANN. Carlos Dionisio Aguirre ALAC to member by LACRALO Chair Participation and Engagement in ICANN WG _________________________________________________________________ Querés to find your emails more express? Organizalos by folders and thus is easier. To see more http://www.descubrewindowslive.com/hotmail/organizacion.asp _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0c8e09dbca.html --]]

1 0

=?utf-8?q?LACNIC_Pol=C3=ADticas_en_discusi=C3=B3 = =?utf-8?q?n_ -- _Policies_under_discussion =
by andrespiazzagpj＠hotmail.com April 26, 2010

April 26, 2010

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: =?utf-8?q?LACNIC_Pol=C3=ADticas_en_discusi=C3=B3 = =?utf-8?q?n_ -- _Policies_under_discussion = From: andrespiazzagpj(a)hotmail.com Dear All, I just want to Copy this email from LACNIC Policy Forum. Those 2 proposals plows right now to under discussion. Regards, AndrÃ©s Piazza Considered, Copio aquÃ this email of the Forum of PolÃticas of LACNIC. Those 2 proposals estÃ n at this moment being debated. Greetings, AndrÃ©s Piazza reenviado Message Of: Nicolas Antoniello <nantoniello(a)gmail.com> Date: 26 of April of 2010 09:42 Subject: [ LACNIC/Politicas ] PolÃticas in discusiÃ³n -- Policies to under discussion It stops: politicas(a)lacnic.net (English below) Considered members of Foro, The following proposals estÃ n in discusiÃ³n. We hoped to receive his commentaries. LAC-2008-05 MicroasignaciÃ³n of IPv6<http://www.lacnic.org/documentos/politicas/LAC-2008-05-1.0-propuesta-sp.pdf> LAC-2009-09 ModificaciÃ³n: 2.3.3.3. Direct distributions to suppliers of service of Internet<http://www.lacnic.org/documentos/politicas/LAC-2009-09-propuesta-sp.pdf> Greetings, Francisco Aryan Nicolas Antoniello Moderators Forum I publish of PolÃticas of LACNIC Dear members of the forum, The following policies plows to under discussion. Please, makeyour comments and considerations. LAC-2008-05 IPv6 MicroâAssignments<http://www.lacnic.org/documentos/politicas/LAC-2008-05-1.0-propuesta-en.pdf> LAC-2009-09 Modification: 2.3.3.3. Direct Allocations to Internet Service Providers<http://www.lacnic.org/documentos/politicas/LAC-2009-09-propuesta-en.pdf> Regards, Francisco Aryan Nicolas Antoniello Co-Chairs of LACNIC Public Policy Forum _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/320eab3a7c.html --]]

1 0

LACNIC Políticas en discusión -- Policies under discussion
by Andres Piazza April 26, 2010

April 26, 2010

Dear All, I just want to copy this email from LACNIC Policy Forum. Those 2 proposals are right now under discussion. Regards, Andrés Piazza ------------------------ Estimados, Copio aquí este email del Foro de Políticas de LACNIC. Esas 2 propuestas están en este momento siendo debatidas. Saludos, Andrés Piazza ---------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- De: Nicolas Antoniello <nantoniello(a)gmail.com> Fecha: 26 de abril de 2010 09:42 Asunto: [LACNIC/Politicas] Políticas en discusión -- Policies under discussion Para: politicas(a)lacnic.net (English below) Estimados miembros del Foro, La siguientes propuestas están en discusión. Esperamos recibir sus comentarios. LAC-2008-05 Microasignación de IPv6<http://www.lacnic.org/documentos/politicas/LAC-2008-05-1.0-propuesta-sp.pdf> LAC-2009-09 Modificación: 2.3.3.3. Distribuciones directas a proveedores de servicio de internet<http://www.lacnic.org/documentos/politicas/LAC-2009-09-propuesta-sp.pdf> Saludos, Francisco Arias Nicolas Antoniello Moderadores Foro Publico de Políticas de LACNIC ------------- Dear members of the forum, The following policies are under discussion. Please, make your comments and considerations. LAC-2008-05 IPv6 Micro‐Assignments<http://www.lacnic.org/documentos/politicas/LAC-2008-05-1.0-propuesta-en.pdf> LAC-2009-09 Modification: 2.3.3.3. Direct Allocations to Internet Service Providers<http://www.lacnic.org/documentos/politicas/LAC-2009-09-propuesta-en.pdf> Regards, Francisco Arias Nicolas Antoniello co-Chairs of LACNIC Public Policy Forum _______________________________________________ Politicas mailing list Politicas(a)lacnic.net https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/politicas _________________________________________________________________

1 0

Re: =?windows-1252?q?Dominio=�co=85_Aporte_DE_ACUI _ = =?windows-1252?q?a_la_lista=� =
by amedinagomez＠gmail.com April 26, 2010

April 26, 2010

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?windows-1252?q?Dominio=Èco=85_Aporte_DE_ACUI _ = =?windows-1252?q?a_la_lista=È = From: amedinagomez(a)gmail.com Dear Alexander and friends of Lacralo. I request excuses by not having been all the meeting of yesterday but unfortunately it had a previous commitment. ACUI from its creation (2000) it has actively participated in diverse activities and scenes, with intention to affect the decisions, is the case of subjects likeGovernment Electronic, Electronic Commerce, Education, co and from the 2007 we led the Internet Governance Forum Colombia, which has demanded us time and significant efforts. And we have made it with transparency and responsibility, since indeed we considered to Internet like instrument to the service of the development of the people andthe organizations public and prevailed. Our mission as Association of Users is to promote the socialization, knowledge, use and advantage of the Technologies of Information and Communications and in individual of Internet in the country. We are it jeopardize with our institutional mission. In many of the cases it has absence or little presence, even of the international community, that in no of the cases appeared at the opportune moment. And we know of national and international experts who have participated in diverse processes. We continued making our task, which is not far fromeasy and that it is to gain spaces of extreme importance, recognition and even representativeness, little by little, with work and tezón. With respect to which Alexander mentions, and I believe that the answer in general goes for all in the list, I want to mention again and Jose Luis does one important reflection since it visualizes to a great extent as it were the process. It is certain that within the extreme arguments that used some of you, in relation to the management undertaken by the U of the $andes it stops to impel the discussions on the subject, where the one was even criticized that it could be understood like "the cession of the dominion to a foreign company", it took to mention elements how the one that now comes to collation... A sale of the name of the mother country. Despite now (10 years later), he would be more advisable to understandof a part, that the patrios symbols are defined in the Constitution and laws and that the dominion CO, is not indeed including like one of them. Of equal way, that the argument of bottom in that then, and gathered in the final uprisings of the high Colombian cuts, Congress of the Republic, the advice of State and the same Government National, is that she would have to be the National Governmentand not a deprived organization, who defines the form how CO must be administered to the dominion. Thanks a the ACUI contributions were created the conditions and changesoccurred significant. Of these conclusions a process had to go ahead to replace one administration guided by the criterion of an only organization(of nature prevailed in a 100%), to a new model that would have to be defined by Government. He was there, where beginning occurred to a process, in which ACUI, that in that then and it seems to me advisable to mention it, it was not ALS, process that lasted several years and that the definition of this model had like objective. they conformed internal commissions within the Ministry, went ahead public sounding to define the first elements and in such sense Ministry contracted to the professional services of aesores and experts international that helped with their knowledge; it was consulted to the ICANN, forums and debates became public in who we participated many actors of the community, published themselves in the official page of the Ministry (today Mintic) the work rough drafts, commented and debated and finally a new model of administration of the dominion was defined and they advanced the managements for its implementation. The model of management of the dominion and its policies of administration, have be object of debate and commentary and they gather the generalconsensus, and I say general because asi is wanted or not is the democratic processes, in process that has been arbitrated of public way by the institutions of nation. In an atmosphere of global access to the dominions, where any user he has access to any dominion actually, certainly co, and more than one sets out to implement the international community, are clear alternatives to and the perhaps most important one of them arethat they offer, availability, security, stability and agility in the administration, for the management in the network on the part of us the users. Sincerely, Antonio Medina Go'mez President Colombian association of Users of Internet The 23 of April of 2010 12:48, Jose Luis Barzallo <joseluis(a)barzallo.com>he wrote: > Dear companions > > the day I remained yesterday without voice in the call and Icould not do this > commentary on co > > seems to Me that the limit of intervention and participationis quite clear > as much of the ALS as of ICANN in the internal subjects of each country, much > more when certain bonds have legally not been closed of the form > usual. > > Creo that the one of was yesterday very important to say here "we are" and if us > does not worry the users about the world because that is ourmission, but either > we must satanizar the taken decision and much less to try than ACUI was > the decisional voice in the process, I am sure that Antonio will have done > to listen to its voice on the matter and its opinion is absolutely respectable, > explanation that I do although has not been attacked it nor demanded nothing else there > of its obligations. > > Agradezco and I congratulate the opinions that have been spilled because they us > will help future to observe with tho! roughness those processes in which > by our nature we must act. > > warm Greetings, > > > Jose Luis Barzallo > > AEDIT > > www.aedit.org.ec > Columbus 535 and 6 of December. > Edif. CristÃ³bal Columbus Of. 602 > Telf: (593 2) 2528774/ 2544464 > Fax: 593 2 2564530 > email: joseluis(a)barzallo.com > Exempt Ecuador > > original -----Mensaje > Of: mailto lac-discuss-is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [: > lac-discuss-is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of Alexander > Pisanty > Envoy: Thursday, 22 of April of 2010 19:01 > For: to info(a)techlaw.com.ar > CC: Spanish LACRALO > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] Dominio.co... Contribution OF ACUI to the list. > > Daniel, > > would introduce a shade. > > we can to neither it touches us like community, nor it touches to ICANN, to take part in > the internal subjects of any country. Particularly they remember that > agreements of the World-wide Summit on the Society of the Information > contains an agreement, that fought to blood ! and fire, that no indicates that > country can take part in th! e admini stration of ccTLD of another one. > > the responsibility that is unquestionable and inclaudicableis the one to discuss, > to define, to spread and to return object from dialogue theconjunction of interests of > the local community of Internet (LIC) and global (GIC) before which > gives the responsibility of ccTLD. This is clear in the RFC1519 and others > documents. > > cannot be compatible with that responsibility an argumentation that no > gives certainty about the policies of ccTLD "stakeholders". > > To risk of happening to me of didactic for some, is necessary to remember that > "stakeholders" is "to which the subject goes to them in something", life, honor, > business, I interest, principles. > > To the companies, institutions and organizations of our countries > must worry that a TLD arises (cc or g) that is lent to registries of > names that force them to defensive registries. To registrars, ISPs, > etc. of the region worries the risk to them about confusionof its us! ers and > everything what he forces to them to adapt his instructive ones, guides, documents and > operations (including antiSpam, phishing, etc.) > > and to all worries to us that bad examples spread. If something is not it, that > is clear. > > Alexander Pisanty > > >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > Dr Alexander Pisanty > UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 > > * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > * LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Ã106C0C8614 > > * Sees ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org > * Participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >. > > > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Daniel Monastersky wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:46:05 -0300 > > From: Daniel M! onastersky <danielmonastersky(a)gmail.com> > > Reply-To: to i! nfo@tech law.com.ar > > To: Alexander Pisanty <apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx> > > Cc: "Spanish [ ISO-8859-1 ] LACRALO" < > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > Subject: > > > Windows-1252?Q?Re=A'_=5Blac=2Ddiscuss=2Des=5D_Dominio=Ãco=85_Aporte_DE_AC > > UI_a _ = [ Windows-1252 ] the list. > > > > I add Me to the preoccupation of Alex. We must intervene in the affair and > > to notice that our mandate is exactly for avoiding that facts happen > > like the one of CO > > > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > > > > Dr Daniel Monastersky > > Partner > > Techlaw | Lawyers > > to www.techlaw.com.ar > > > > CEO & Founder > > Robbed Identity > > www.identidadrobada.com > > > > > > > > day 22 of April of 2010 19:27, Alexander Pisanty > > <apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx> it wrote: > > > AndrÃ©s, Antonio, all, > > > > > > thousand excuses by not being able to participate in the today teleconferencing; m! y > > > plans was frustrated minute in the last. > > > > > > Hopefully the subject that is in discussion, on co, allows us to explore > > > many to which it is related and is object of preoccupation and action of > > > our organizations, each one in individual and all altogether. > > > > > > Alexander Pisanty > > > > > > > > >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >. > > > Dr Alexander Pisanty > > > UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > > > > > Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 > > > > > > * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > > > * LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > > > * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > > > * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, > > > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Ã106C0C8614 > > > > > > * Sees ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http! ://www.isoc.org > > > * Participates in ICANN, http://ww! w.icann. org > > >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >. . > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Andres Piazza wrote: > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:11:22 +0000 > > > > From: Andres Piazza <andrespiazzagpj(a)hotmail.com> > > > > To: apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx, amedinagomez(a)gmail.com > > > > Cc: "[ Spanish Windows-1252 ] LACRALO" > > > > <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > > > Subject: [ Windows-1252 ] RE: [ lac-discuss-is ] Dominio.co~E Aporte OF > ACUI a > > > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Alexander, in the Teleconferencing that this happening in this > > > > same moment, I ask myself to him Antonio on this subject. > > > > Just tapeworm that to go away, asi that could not respond. > > > > > > > > Your I raise summarizes the preoccupation that habia raised and, al! so > > > > > mia. > > > > > > > > Thanks for the contribution. > > > > > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > > > Andres > > > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:48:34 +0000 > > > > > From: apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx > > > > > To: amedinagomez(a)gmail.com > > > > > CC: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] Dominio.co... Contribution OF ACUI to the list. > > > > > > > > > > Antonio, > > > > > > > > > > but putting the things a little more in clear. Whenoriginally > > > > > proposed, ten years ago, that co could be used likealternative a > > > > > com > > > > > by the interested ones, armed the one of San QuintÃn because "it was tried > > > > > to sell > > > > > the name of the Mother country "or something ! of which this affirmation is not one > > > > > ver! sion > & gt; > > > very exaggerated. > > > > > > > > > > the process of the decade had like objective to create new rules for > > > > > new operator and to replace the previous one. > > > > > > > > > > Now the new rules is being read because co can be > used > > > > > like alternative to com by the interested ones. > > > > > > > > > > How it explains ACUI or how ACUI reacts or how it denies like erroneous > > > > > ACUI this interpretation, that indeed could be erroneous or > > > > > incomplete? > > > > > > > > > > EYE: this question has meaning for the history of ccTLDs and > by > > > > > as much for the history and the culture of Internetin the region, and by > > > > > possible extension of its criteria, in a species ofRight > Compared, > > > > > a > > > > > other countries, thus to i! nclude/understand the precedent is important. No > > > > > > deals with an attempt of interference of a country brother, respected and > > > > > wanted. > > > > > > > > > > Alexander Pisanty > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >. > > > > >. > > > > > Dr Alexander Pisanty > > > > > UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > > > > > > > > > Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 > > > > > > > > > > * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > > > > > * LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > > > > > * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > > > > > * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, > > > > > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Ã106C0C8614 > > > > > > > > > &! gt; * Sees ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://ww! w.isoc.o rg > > > > > * Participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org > > > > >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >. > > > > >. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, [ ISO-8859-1 ] Antonio Medina Go'mez wrote: > > > > > > >>>>> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:18:04 -0500 > >>>>> From: "[ ISO-8859-1 ] Antonio Medina Go'mez" <amedinagomez(a)gmail.com> > >>>>> To: "Spanish [ ISO-8859-1 ] LACRALO" > >>>>> <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > >>>>> Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] [ Windows-1252 ] Dominio.co~E Aporte OF ACUI > a > >>>>> > >>>>> list. > >>>>> > >>>>> Dear friends > >>>>> > >>>>> From the Colombian Association of Users of Internet we have been > >>>>> kind > >>>>> to the commentaries! in relation to dominio.co and like ALS of Lacralo > >>>>> we want > >>>>> to make the following contributions. > >>>>> > >>>>> Is of fundamental importance of mentioning that the evolution and development > of > >>>>> > >>>>> dominions in Colombia associated to co has lived a complex process > but > >>>>> also participativo. > >>>>> > >>>>> the interested ones in knowing some these aspects, can accede > to > >>>>> vestibule of the Ministry of the Technologies of Information and > >>>>> Communications > >>>>> through the following connection > >>>>> http://www.mintic.gov.co/mincom/faces/index.jsp?id=1279 > >>>>> > >>>>> the Colombian Association of Users of Internet in thedevelopment of > >>>>> this > >>>>> process has part! icipated actively in representation of the community > of > &g! t;>&g t;>> usuary of Internet of Colombia. > >>>>> > >>>>> Is necessary to mention that a public process was made - by > less > >>>>> of 10 > >>>>> years -, in head of the Ministry of the Technologies of Information and > > >>>>> Communications, MINTIC, process that has been characterized - like many > >>>>> others > >>>>> by being opened, transparent and participativo, and the different ones > people > >>>>> and > >>>>> organizations who participated, at their moment presented/displayed > publicly > >>>>> his > >>>>> points of view or written proposal, scene of > >>>>> respect and of consensus. > >>>>> > >>>>> These processes allowed him, to in that then Ministryof > >>>>> Communications, to establish, as much the management model and > administration >! >>>>> like > >>>>> the inherent policies to that administration and in individual > >>>>> criteria > >>>>> necessary for the evaluation and selection of the organization in charge of > > >>>>> administration. The last years, in this context it was lived > process > >>>>> of > >>>>> well-known Licitation and openly socialized. > >>>>> > >>>>> In these processes ACUI participated making the contributions > corresponding > >>>>> in > >>>>> work meetings that helped the Ministry to define aspects > >>>>> excellent and to help to obtain consensus, that is what finally > >>>>> enriches > >>>>> these discussions, all it in a democratic atmosphere. > >>>>> > >>>>> Is important then to remember that the Ministry of > >>>>> Technolo! gies > >>>>> of Information and the Communicati! ons has under its responsibility > > >>>>> policy definition, the activities of control and monitoring of > >>>>> dominio.co <http://domino.co/>. > >>>>> > >>>>> Hay to emphasize that today dominio.co offers more value for > >>>>> community of > >>>>> Internet. It allows the users to be recognized and tobe located in > >>>>> Internet a > >>>>> global level, to take advantage of a standard world-wide class, with rules > clear > >>>>> and > >>>>> nondiscretionary of a single person. And this also has enormous > >>>>> benefits that are translated in efficiency, service, capacity and > price. > >>>>> > >>>>> Today we have a good, advisable, interesting dominionand the plus > >>>>> important, > >>>>> result of a participativo process. We must continue > task > >&g! t;>>> of > >>>>> to work in an ambient transparency and of respect in order to obtain more > and > >>>>> better benefits usuary them and to support the decisions > adopted > >>>>> in > >>>>> consensus and right context. > >>>>> > >>>>> Antonio Medina Go'mez > >>>>> President > >>>>> Colombian Association of Users of Internet > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> lac-discuss-is mailing list > >>>>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>>>> > >>>>> > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es_atlarge-list… > >>>>> > >>>>> http://www.lacralo.org > >>>>> > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > > &g! t; > > > > __________________________________________! _____ > > > lac-discuss-is mailing list > > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es_atlarge-list… > > > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Dr Daniel Monastersky > > Partner > > Techlaw | Lawyers > > to www.techlaw.com.ar > > > > CEO & Founder > > Robbed Identity > > www.identidadrobada.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es_atlarge-list… > > http://www.lacralo.org > -- Antonio Medina Gomez President Colombian association of Users of Internet. ACUI presidencia(a)acui.org.co amedinagomez(a)gmail.com http://www.acui.org.co _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/313b93261f.html --]]

1 0