August 2009 - lac-discuss-en

=?iso-8859-1?q?RES=�_resumen_respuestas_sobre_U = =?iso-8859-1?q?suarios_Finales_en_relaci=F3n_a_NgTLD_y_IPv6 =
by sylvia＠prontocl.com.br Aug. 4, 2009

Aug. 4, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?RES=Á_resumen_respuestas_sobre_U = =?iso-8859-1?q?suarios_Finales_en_relaci=F3n_a_NgTLD_y_IPv6 = From: sylvia(a)prontocl.com.br Thanks Jorge! Much with your interesting and complete information is always learned. Good what that you appeared in the list of lac-discuss Greetings, Sylvia -----Mensagem original Of: lac-discuss-it is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org ] command post nome of Jorge Amodio Shipment command post: terça-feira, 4 of August of 2009 11:03 It stops: sylvia-internautabrasil Cc: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Assunto: Re: [ lac-discuss-es]resumen answers on End users in relation to NgTLD and IPv6 Very good Sylvia work. On IPv6 you can add some things but as benefit. Since the development of the new version of IP I do not focus exclusively in the problem of exhaustion of the IPv4 directions, I take advantage of opportunity to solve other problems and to add functionality. For example, IPv6 was designed from a beginning with options in individual in order to facilitate the implementation of mobiles applications, on the other hand subject to have but a much ample space of directions and not to require the NAT use (Network Address Translation, that in fact does not exist stops IPv6) allows to again return to the paradigm from comuinicacion to peer-to-peer, asi that this is going to generate new applications, many of them in mobiles platforms. Another one of the benefits of IPv6 is that I add myself but support stops multicasting, this is going also to foment the development of applications like video conferences or distribution of multimedia on IP in a form much but efficient that with IPv4. I complete commentary on IPv6. Surely the panel and study that I organize ISOC and others habran sight papers/trabajos on the slow adoption of IPv6 when apparently not existing been accustomed to "business marries" for it. There is something is going to be inevitable, sooner or later IPv6 is going to begin a to not even replace gradually to IPv4 and new quizas applications they esten available in IPv4. Todavia possibly does not know when and not in too much detail like, but he is something that is going to happen. For the end user he is something or deberia to be something totally transparent, but for those who provide services of telecommunications or Internet, students and developer, are highly advisable who begin a to take the hand him and to make experience with IPv6 and not to continue kicking the subject future. Who from now on comienzen to become qualified and to experiment with IPv6 they go a to be in one better position than who continue letting pass itlike something no high-priority today in day. With a little content tecnico and only available in ingles, aqui they can see a presentation of a great and old friend (Randy Bush) who is contributed much in the past for the development of networks in LAyC. http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog46/presentations/Monday/Nina_randy_pay_N4 6.pdf Like diria Randy, they can pay and despacito little to me now,or much and of serve in the future. Greetings Jorge _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/707da43c92.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =?iso-8859-1?q?resumen_respuestas_sobre_Usuarios = =?iso-8859-1?q?_Finales_en_relaci=F3n_a_NgTLD_y_IPv6 =
by jmamodio＠gmail.com Aug. 4, 2009

Aug. 4, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?resumen_respuestas_sobre_Usuarios = =?iso-8859-1?q?_Finales_en_relaci=F3n_a_NgTLD_y_IPv6 = From: jmamodio(a)gmail.com Very good Sylvia work. On IPv6 you can add some things but as benefit. Since the development of the new version of IP I do not focus exclusively in problem of exhaustion of the IPv4 directions, I take advantage of opportunity stops to solve other problems and to add functionality. For example, IPv6 was designed from a beginning with options in individual in order to facilitate the implementation of mobiles applications, by another one side the subject of to have but a much ample space of directions and not to require the use of NAT (Network Address Translation, that in fact does not exist for IPv6) allows to again return to the paradigm from comuinicacion to peer-to-peer, asi that this goes a to generate new applications, many of them in mobiles platforms. Another one of the benefits of IPv6 is that I add but support for multicasting, this is going also to foment the development of applications like video conferences or distribution of multimedia on IP in but a much efficient form that with IPv4. I complete commentary on IPv6. Surely the panel and study that I organize ISOC and others habran sight papers/trabajos on the slow adoption of IPv6 when apparently not existing been accustomed to "business it marries" for it. There is something is going to be inevitable, sooner or later IPv6 is going to begin a to not even replace gradually to IPv4 and new quizas applications they esten available in IPv4. Todavia possibly does not know when and not in too much detail like, but he is something that is going to happen. For the end user he is something or deberia to be something totally transparent, but for those who provide services of telecommunications or Internet, students and developer, are highly advisable who begin a to take the hand him and to make experience with IPv6 and not to continue kicking subject to the future. Who from now on comienzen to become qualified and to experiment with IPv6 they are going to be in one better position than who continue letting pass it like something nonhigh-priority today in day. With a little content tecnico and only available in ingles, aqui can see a presentation of a great and old friend (Randy Bush) that has contributed much in the past for the development of networks in LAyC. http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog46/presentations/Monday/Nina_randy_pay_N… Like diria Randy, they can pay and despacito little to me now, or much and of a serve in the future. Greetings Jorge _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/70737b8a7c.html --]]

1 0

=?iso-8859-1?q?resumen_respuestas_sobre_Usuarios = =?iso-8859-1?q?_Finales_en_relaci=F3n_a_NgTLD_y_IPv6 =
by sylvia＠internautabrasil.org Aug. 4, 2009

Aug. 4, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?resumen_respuestas_sobre_Usuarios = =?iso-8859-1?q?_Finales_en_relaci=F3n_a_NgTLD_y_IPv6 = From: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org Dear companions of Lacralo: since it had promised to them here is the summary of all the answers that I obtained when asking to them you and members of other organizations Brazilian, the following thing: * How they are going to affect to the End users of our respective ones countries the introduction of nGTLD * And in what it is going to benefit or to harm the change of the IPv4 for IPv6 New gTLD Most of the answers they agree in which the pluses interesados/beneficiados they will be the companies and I say will be because, to not being the Registrant most of the commercial companies does not know that that it is treating in ICANN, nor know that soon they could have his own one gTLD. Although due to the high such single value of great companies will be able to dare to have gTLD. Of the side of the End user little or practicamente nothing we will have to win. Including some they responded the opposite to me, who the User would have much that to lose! See the following examples: If bank were created it is logical to hope that all those that they buy dominion bank will be banks financial institutions, or at least he is that what the final Usuário is going to think! And that can bring two great problems, first that will be facil stops hakers to deceive the User causing who thinks that to connect itself to one Page that always finishes with bank will be a bank or a safe place stops to make financial transactions secondly and that can create attack sector common (single point of failure) whoever to attack to the banking organizations without taking the work from knowing the name of each one of them, thing that does not happen (is dificil) with com or with ccTLD. and would the same pass with gay or some similar thing with one certain political or religious direction, those people could be easily attacked or censured to be all meetings in that gTLD. IPv4- IPv6 All the /comentarios answers with respect to the IPšv6 are unanimous when indicating that it is a natural process to the wearing down and exhaustion of the IPv4. and that it will allow the growth of the network. The forecasts indicate that the free directions in IPv4 will be exhausted in 2011 ou 2013. And without new numbers IP he would be very complicated to connect to new users of Internet. Prevee that both, IPv4 and IPv6, work side to side in Internet during many years, but in the long run the IPv6 will be the unique one to being used. This would be very important since one of the answers indicates that some users end could be harmed with this change. Let us suppose the smallones and medium companies of telecommunications of Latin America that take care of distant regions of gandes urban centers. For them the impact will be very hard and until for some devastating being able to disappear and generating consequently social unemployment and problems. Also we must have in account, for example, the Telecentros that uses software old, these will not work with IPv6, having thus been able to even cause more exclusion digitalis. The key would be the padronización of the technology so that all can benefit from the best possible way. "the technological Changes they must be responsible " Here in Brazil, the IPv6 already was adopted by NIC.br. In theNIC network. br access to the Google via IPv6, for example, already is activated. In agreement with Berthier Ribeiro-Neto, Director of engineering of Google, "this first IPv6 connection of the company in Latin America and indicates preoccupation that the company has with the adoption in scale of the new one protocol " Those that is interested in knowing more of these subjects: <http://ipv6.google.com/> http://ipv6.google.com. In LACNIC very active work group exists um on this subject that envia weekly summaries: Plows you ready for IPv6? <http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroom&id=5131> http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroom&id=5131 Five of the Biggest IPv6-Based Threats Facing CIOs <http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroom&id=5129> http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroom&id=5129 IPv6 hair net traffic poses serious network threat <http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroom&id=5128> http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroom&id=5128 >From the LACNIC group also I took these information in which atalks about the attitudes of some governments before the adoption of the IPv6: These are some examples of paises that have taken initiatives to support the unfolding of IPv6: Japan: it focuses mainly his actions in supporting, creating and to finance two assemblies of diferecniadas initiatives affluent: - IPv6 Promotion Council ( <blocked::http://www.v6pc.jp/en/index.phtml> http://www.v6pc.jp/en/index.phtml) - Initiatives of R+D that include the companies, academic sector e industries, such as Project WIDE, KAME, Usagi, etc. and the network of education: Japan Gigabit Network. In the U.S.A. the unfolding of IPv6 is a governmental mandate. In August of the 2005, the Office of Direction and Budget of the U.S.A. (OMB) emitted the Memorando M-05-22, "Planning of the Transition to ProtocolInternet Version 6 (IPv6)"assigning by mandate the unfolding of IPv6 in backbones of the networks of the federal governmental agenciesof The U.S.A. for June of the 2008. Malaysia: It makes two main actions: - of Energy Establishes the National council IPv6 under Ministry, Water and Communication (MEWC), to provide the vision, mission and strategic plan stops the implementation of IPv6 in Malaysia. - Next to USM (Universiti Sains Malaysia) and other organisms of investigation and development work from year 2005 so that Malaysian it is a nation "IPv6-enabled" towards year 2010, planning for it programs of diffusion and training on IPv6. France: Here the recommendations come on the part of the IPv6 TF that was impelled by the government, and it has between his members nothing less than: 6WIND, AFNIC, Alcatel, France Télécom R&D, G6, RENATER, Renault. Such recommendations were presented/displayed the Minister of Investigation and New Tecnologias: <blocked::http://www.fr.ipv6tf.org/DATA/PRESS/Recommandations IPv6 TFF (English).pdf > http://www.fr.ipv6tf.org/DATA/PRESS/Recommandations%20IPv6%20TFF%20(English) pdf But information: <http://portalipv6.lacnic.net/es/ipv6/ipv6-en/gobierno> http://portalipv6.lacnic.net/es/ipv6/ipv6-en/gobierno That is everything so far, any doubt or to send infomaciones to me of his region, I am to disposition Greetings, Sylvia _______________________________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein Leite - Brazil Internaut _____ Of: sylvia-internautabrasil [ mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org ] Shipment command post: second-feira, 20 of julho of 2009 10:00 It stops: ' lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org' Assunto: HEAD OF CATTLE: work group Raiz Zone Dear companions of Lacralo; without a doubt some that the subject of Zone Root is very technician and most of things escape to the understanding of the end user, but this has served to me in order to know enough this subject and I am going to share it with you. Therefore our group will not be able, of this time and until the 31/07, to make no contribution from the end users to the 3 organisms that are ordered of this subject. Although I have found several pages and other they have been recommended me by very interesting members of the list and I try to make a summary stops to share it with you. On the other hand I am making a rise of opinions here in Brazil, about the 2 questions that I sent to them in my firstmessage: * How they are going to affect to the End users of our respective ones countries the introduction of nGTLD * And in what it is going to benefit or to harm the change ofthe IPv4 for IPv6 Although the 2 subjects are things already decided, they are being very interesting the answers that I am obtaining ytambién of thisthem I promise a summary. He would be interesting which you they the same do in paises and to join all the information. I wait its commentaries and helps! Greetings to all. Sylvia _______________________________________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein Leite Brazil Internaut _____ Of: sylvia-internautabrasil [ mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org ] Shipment command post: sixth-feira, 17 of julho of 2009 11:06 It stops: ' lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org' Assunto: work group Raiz Zone Dear companions of Lacralo; In the teleconferencing of we yesterday were in agreement to form groups of work on the opened subjects to discussion. One of the subjects that are open to commentaries in ICANN until the 31 of 2009 July, is Studies on Raiz Zone. The Meeting of ICANN asked for the Consultative Commission of system of servers root (RSSAC), to the Consultative Commission of security and stability (SNCC), and to the personnel of the ICANN to study the potential impact on stability of the zone root that arises when the address registers IPv6, IDN superior level names, new dominions of first level,and new registries of support to the DNS security are added to the zone of root. Without a doubt that all these changes will produce a global effect on operations of zone by roots. In answer to the request of the Meeting, these organisms formed a group of direction and organization of a study trim. The reach of this study includes all the aspects of operations of zone root. By Zone root of operations it is understood all aspects of the zone root of production of data, compilation, publication a the servers root, etc. Being a subject very technician, that he escapes to my condition of end user, me I will occupy, like me has suggested it Jorge Amodio, to determine the effect that it is going to produce in the end user of Internet these subjects. We in Lacralo are forming a group to see this subject of the side of the end user. I hope that they accompany to me in this arduous task and ours region can contribute its grain of sand to these so complex subjects. Those that be interested in participating please make contact with enemywith me: <mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org> sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org . Some of the things that we would have to find out would be: * How they are going to affect to the End users of our respective ones countries the introduction of nGTLD * And in what it is going to benefit or to harm the change ofthe IPv4 for IPv6 * I wait its commentaries * Greetings, Sylvia Herlein Leite Brazil Internaut [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/34061ec626.html --]]

1 0