September 2009 - lac-discuss-en

Fwd: Recovery of dominions
by fatimacambronero＠gmail.com Sept. 10, 2009

Sept. 10, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Fwd: Recovery of dominions From: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com In name of Jose Francisco Arce and Fátima Cambronero: Thank you very much Jose Barzallo by this contribution that serves us to all members of the list to understand a little more on the subject and to excite to us by such. Now, by questions of lack of time, we come to contribute few commentaries adding us to the expressed thing by Jose, that we thought that they can to us to serve all, specially to the users of Internet and to those who they have that to guard by its interests. The interlineados commentaries go. 2009/9/9 Jose Luis Barzallo <joseluis(a)barzallo.com> > Dear companions ALS and ALAC > > Revise' the documents related to the recovery of names of > dominion in an additional or special term. I send east summary to him stops > to facilitate its participation. > > the essential questions turn around > > - if he is feasible to make these changes? > - If they are necessary? > - As must be the changes to implement itself? > - As the changes must be implemented? > > > For the users the recovery of the dominion names is > advisable in as much as soon as goes in its benefit and the participation of > GNSO in the valid and necessary analysis in. > It is necessary to remember that there is a ALAC order so thatthe GNSO is pronounced ( http://gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/issues/post-expiration-recovery/report-05d…) The representatives of the users are those that must be pending of which this is fulfilled. > > That is to say, the recommendations would have to go towardsobtaining a total > transparency in the notification to registrantes the respectto the date of > completion of the period of registry to avoid possible frauds or > manipulation of the warning. > In this it is in where there is no a consensus policy and therefore no binding for all the Recorders. Each one is handled by the agreements that it has signed with ICANN and there is no a solution uniforms that it applies stops all equal ones. Some notify through the page Web (is insisted on that it is in a visible place; others through a mail (the doubt arises respect to which has transferred the name of dominion with anteriority and therefore the mail that is registered is the one of the previous one to title, and therefore the present one, would not be being been notifying, or at least no with fehaciencia and certainty). There is no a form "is transparent", fehaciente and safe that it is being used of notification. In this point it would have to obtain a binding consensus and therefore, for all the Recorders. > > Is fundamental that the burden of proof always has the Recorder and > that this must justify the opportune warning that occurred, this way > will have a greater security respect to which happens to thedominion of > usuary. > > the retention during a special period must be obligatory forall > the recorders and always must count very on clear policies and > public for knowledge of the users. A specific warning respect to > operation would be appropriate. > Options have been tried on this, like prohibiting the transference of dominion name while it is in period of retention (that of step, each recorder establishes the term of.redemption that wants, since with respect to it is no a political uniform either), but this option was criticized and it stopped being "obligatory" to happen to handle it each voluntarily Recorder. > > the cost does not have to be superior or low no concept to duplicate the original one > paid by the user. The recorder can retain the dominion during > limited additional period, soon of which it will be able to put to him a value superior > not being part of its responsibility. > The Recorder * would have * to retain the dominion during a limited period, but that is a uniform term, of public binding knowledge and hestops all the Recorders. With respect to the cost, after won said period and not recovered by its holder original (or at issue) would have to handle itself like a new dominion and with the same cost ofacquiring a dominion new, without no original value. This would allow a treatment equality stops all the registrantes and/or users. > > the transferences between companies or organizations are notdue to accept > related because they would enter doubtful situations respectto his origin. > If a policy of consensus for all the Recorders existed by equal, with uniform terms, any conflict would not exist in transferences between related companies or organizations or no, they would eliminate many possibilities of fraud or in damage of third other people's. The vision that has the association of the end users of Internet, that they are consuming of Dominions, and in special with respect to the recovery of the expired dominions, it begins with the preoccupation of the lack of information of the users of how it is the chain of distribution of Dominions; that is to say, the recorders exist and after them there is a series of companies that they resell such, and these companies aboundand it is created that the secondary market of dominions "or aftermarket is called" * *, this it produces in the users a true confusion; added to that many of they administer several dominions and they cannot remember thevictory of all, although exists some tools to obtain it. This added to that at the time of wanting to transfer some dominion the recordermust, in some cases of granting to the End user a code to him, which several companies are obstinate to do it. The subject at the time of dealing with dominions worsens that they try to be sold in 1.4 million dollars, in where the interests in game does not allow mistakes, nor double interpretations. Let us think that it is necessary to debate these questions and to help users a to understand as they are the alternatives of the ways that gTLD crosses from ICANN until the user acquires the same one. Our work is branched off here in two. One towards ALAC informing to him vision of the end user of the Region and another one towards the end users in giving them to the tools and basic information so that it can develop in freedom. >From the association, with Fátima Cambronero, both of Ageia Densi Argentina, we are in process of processing of a more extensive document to spread these knowledge to the different users and so that they have information in a single document and several languages, and does not have to digress in pages and forums in search of an answer. The same one will favor a the actors of the region to animate itself to touch these subjects and to debate in depth such to the aims of being able to raise ALAC a knowledge to him certain of the necessities of the subjects in debate and ideas and contributions that go directed to favor the user. Greetings to All Jose F. Arce Fátima Cambronero http://ar.ageiadensi.org/ http://ar.ageiadensi.org/ _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/d06cc201c1.html --]]

1 0

recovery of dominions
by joseluis＠barzallo.com Sept. 10, 2009

Sept. 10, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: recovery of dominions From: joseluis(a)barzallo.com Considered compaÃ±eros ALS and ALAC RevisÃ© the documents related to recuperaciÃ³n of names ofdominion in an additional or special term. I send east summary to him to facilitate his participaciÃ³n. The essential questions turn around - if he is feasible to make these changes? - If they are necessary? - As they must be the changes to implement itself? - As the changes must be implemented? For the users recuperaciÃ³n of the dominion names is advisable in as much as soon as participaciÃ³n of the GNSO in anÃ goes in its benefit and lida and necessary lisis in vÃ. That is to say, the recommendations deberÃan to go towards managing atotal transparency in notificaciÃ³n to registrantes the respect to thedate of terminaciÃ³n of the period of registry to avoid possible frauds or manipulaciÃ³n of the warning. It is fundamental that the burden of proof always has the Recorder andwho this must justify the opportune warning that occurred, this way tendrÃ a greater security respect to which happens to the dominion of the user. RetenciÃ³n during a special period must be obligatory for all the recorders and they always must count on clear and very pÃºblicas polÃticas for knowledge of the users. A especÃfico warning respect to the appropriate operation serÃa. The cost does not have to be superior or low ningÃºn concept to duplicate the original one paid by the user. The recorder can retain the dominion during a limited additional period, soon of which podrÃ to put a superior value to him not being part of its responsibility. The transferences between related companies or organizations are not due to accept because they entrarÃan in doubtful situations respect to his origin. This from personal my visiÃ³n under parÃ meters of Users. Warm greetings, JosÃ© Luis Barzallo AEDIT www.aedit.org.ec ColÃ³n 535 and 6 of December. Edif. CristÃ³bal ColÃ³n Of. 602 Telf: (593 2) 2528774/ 2544464 Fax: 593 2 2564530 Email: joseluis(a)barzallo.com Quito Ecuador Original -----Mensaje Of: lac-discuss-he is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of jose maple Sent: Domingo, 23 of August of 2009 10:01 He stops: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] Document of the NCUC! By some RazÃ³n I do not arrive the attached file. It goes again with the text in message tambiÃ©n. Greetings JosÃ© F. Arce. www.ar.ageiadensi.org CIVIL TOP TEN MYTHS ABOUT SOCIETY PARTICIPATION IN ICANN > From The Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC) 21 August 2009 ______________________________________________________________________________ Myth 1 âCivil Society wonât participate in ICANN to under NCUCâs charter proposal.â False. Civil ICANN staffers and others claim that society is discouraged from engaging AT ICANN because NCUCâs proposal charter does not guarantee GNSO Council seats to constituencies. The facts could not be to further from the truth. NCUCâs membership includes 143 noncommercial organizations and individuals. Since 2008 NCUCâs membership there are increased by dwells civil 215% â "largely in direct response to forsocietyâ s support the NCUC charter. Not to single noncommercial organization commented in the public comment forum that hard-wiring council seats to constituencies will induces to their participation in ICANN. None of the noncommercial organizations that commented on the NCSG Chartersaid they would participate to ICANN only if NCSG's Charter secured the constituencies to guaranteed seat on the GNSO. Myth 2 âMore civil society groups will get involved if the Board intervenes.â To it completes illusion. Board imposition of its own refusal charter and its to list to civil society groups will be interpreted ace rejection of the many groups that commented and ace discrimination against civil society participation. NoncommercialICANNâ s reputation among groups will be irreparably damaged unless this action is reversed or to compromise is found. Even if we were to accept these actions and try to work with them, the total impact of the staff/SIC NCSG charter will be to handicap noncommercial groups and make them less likely to participate. The appointment of representatives by the noncommercial Board disenfranchises groups and individuals. The constituency-based SIC structure requires toomuch for organizational overhead most noncommercial organizations to sustain; it also pits groups against each to other in political competition for you vote and members. Noncommercial Most organizations will not to enter the ICANN GNSO to under those conditions. Myth 3 Civil The outpouring of society opposition dog be dismissed ace the product of to ' letter writing campaign.' An outrageous claim. Civil Overwhelming society opposition to the SIC charter you emerge not eleven, but twice. In addition, there is the massive growth in NCUC membership stimulated by the to broader communityâs opposition to the staff and Board actions. Attempts to minimize the degree to which civil society you have been undermined by these developments plows simply not going to work, and reveal to shocking degree of insularity and arrogance. ICANN is required to have public comment periods because it is supposed to lists to andbe responsive to public opinion. Public opinion results from networks of communication and public engages in a dialog on controversial issues, including organized calls to action. Not policy or bylaw gives ICANN staff the authority to decides that it dog discount or ignores nearly all of the groups who have they taken an interest in the GNSO reforms, simply because they have taken to position critical of the staffâs. ICANN's âTop 10 Myths Civil About Society Participation in ICANNâby NCUC 2 attempt to discount critical comments by labeling them to "letter writing campaign "undermines future participation and confidence in ICANN public processes. Myth 4 "Civil society is divided on the NCSG charter issue." Wrong. There you have to never been such an overwhelmingly lopsided public comment period in ICANNâs history. While ICANNâs staff is telling the civil Board that society is divided, the to clear, documented consensus among civil society groups youhave been against the ICANN drafted NCSG charter and in favor of the NCUC one. Board members who rely only on staff-provided information may believe civil society is divided, but Board members who have actually read the public comments civil dog see the solidarity of society against what ICANN is trying to impose on them. Myth 5 "civil Existing society groups plows not representative or todiver enough." Standard Untrue by any reasonable. Civil The current society grouping,the Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC), now there are 143 members including 73 noncommercial organizations and 70 individuals in 48 countries. This is an increase of dwells than 215% since the parity principle was established.1 Noncommercial participation in ICANN is now dwells to diver itself they than any to other constituency, under it is completely to unfair to level this charge AT NCUC without applying it to others. Even back in 2006, an independent report by theLondon School of Economics showed that NCUC was the most to diver geographically, had the largest to number of different people serving on the GNSO Council to over Time, and the highest to turn-over in council representatives of any of the 6 constituencies. In contrast, the commercial usersâ constituency there are recycled the same 5 people on the for Council to decade and upon the GNSO âreformâ, the first 3 of 6 GNSO Councilors from the Commercial Stakeholder Group will represent the United States. Myth 6 "ALAC prefers the ICANN staff drafted charter to over the civil society drafted charter." False. One ALAC to leader said that she prefers the staff drafted charter. ICANN staff ran away with this comment and falsely told the ICANN Board of Directors that ALAC prefers the staff drafted charter. In fact, the formal statement actually approved by ALAC said that many members proposal of ALAC supported the NCUC and that âthe of-linking of Council seats from Constituencies is to very good move in the right direction.â Myth 7 "The NCUC charter would give the same small group 6 you vote instead of 3." False. For the past 8 months, NCUC there are stated that it will dissolve when the NCSG is formed. Sense It does not make to have to "Noncommercial Users Constituency" and a "Noncommercial Stakeholders Group, â ace they plows synonymous terms. Thus, NCUC leaders would not be in 1 We encourage those GNSO constituencies who claim is NCUC isinsufficiently large enough to deserve representational parity with commercial users on the GNSO Council to publish to their own constituencyâs current membership to roster, ace NCUC does AT: to http://ncdnhc.org/page/membership-roster. âTop 10 Myths Civil About Society Participation in ICANNâ by NCUC 3 control of to new NCSG â "to completely new leadership would be elected. Under the NCUC proposal charter, all noncommercial groups and individuals would votes on Council seats, not just to former NCUC members. Strict geographic diversity requirements would pisses that candidates from throughout the world would have to be selected even if they could not get to majority of total you vote. Myth 8 "council NCUC will not share seats with to other noncommercial constituencies." Wrong. NCUCâs proposed charter was designed to allow dozens of new noncommercial constituencies to form AT will and to advance to their own candidates for Council seats. Given the diversity and breadth of NCUC's membership, many different constituencies with competing agendas to plows likely form. The organic, bottom-up self-forming approach to constituency formation is much to better than the board/staff approach â "and dwells consistent with the BGC recommendations. The SIC charter makes constituency formationvery top-heavy and difficult, and gives the staff and Board arbitrary to power to decides how ârepresentativeâ or âsignificantâ new participants plows. Because it ties constituencies to Council seats, every new constituency instigates to power struggles to over the allocation of Council seats. Myth 9 "The NCUC wants to take away the Board's right to approve constituencies." False. People who said this have obviously not read the NCUC-proposed charter. NCUCâs proposal let the board approve or disapprove of new constituencies formed to under its proposed charter. Simple proposal Our simply offered to apply some, objective criteria (e.g., to number of applicants) to new constituency groupings and then make to recommendation to the Board. The idea was to reduces the burden of forming to new constituencyfor both the applicants and the Board. ProposalNCUCâ s made it easy to form new constituencies, unlike the SIC charter, which makes it difficult to form new constituencies. Myth 10 âThe purpose of to constituency is to have your very own GNSO Council Seat.â False. Some claim GNSO Council seats must be hard-wired to specific constituencies because a constituency is meaningless without to guaranteed GNSO Council representative. However this interpretation fails to understand the role of constituenciesin the new GNSO, which is to give a voice and to means of participation in the policy developmentprocess -- not to guaranteed councilor who there are little stimulates to reach beyond to her constituency and find consensus with to other constituencies. Two of the to other three to stakeholder groups (Registries and Registrars) adopted NCUCâs charter approach of decoupling GNSO Council seats to constituencies, but NCUC you have electing been prevented from its councilors on to SG-wide basis. JOIN NCUC Noncommercial All organizations and individuals plows invitedto join NCUC and participate in policy development in ICANNâs GNSO. Bring your experience and your perspective to Internet policy discussions and help protect noncommercial users of the Internet by participating AT ICANN via the NCUC. Join today: http://icann-ncuc.ning.com/main/authorization/signUp? âTop GLOSSARY OF ICANN ACRONYMS ALAC - AT-Large Advisory Committee ICANN's AT-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) is responsible forconsidering and providing advice on the activities of the ICANN, ace they relates to the interests of individual Internet users (the "AT-Large" community). gTLD - Generic Top Level Domain Most TLDs with three or dwells characters plows referred to ace "generic" TLDs, or "gTLDs". They dog be subdivided into two types, "sponsored" TLDs (sTLDs) and "unsponsored TLDs (uTLDs), ace described in dwells detail below. In the 1980s, seven gTLDs (com, edu, gov, int, mil, net, and org) were created. Domain names may be registered in three of these (com, net, and org)without restriction; the to other four have limited purposes. Over the next twelve years, various discussions occurred concerning additional gTLDs, leading to the selection in November 2000 of seven new For TLDs introduction. These were introduced in 2001 and 2002. Four ofthe new TLDs (biz, info, name, and pro) plows unsponsored. The to other three new TLDs(aero, coop, and museum) plows sponsored. GNSO - Generic Names Supporting Organization The GNSO is responsible for developing policy recommendationsto the ICANN Board that generic relates to top-level domains (gTLDs). The GNSO is the body of 6 constituencies, ace follows: the Commercial and Business constituency, the gTLD Registry constituency, the ISP constituency, the non-commercial constituency, the registrar's constituency, and the IP constituency. However, the GNSO is in the process of restructuring away from to framework of 6 constituencies to 4 to stakeholder groups: Commercial, Noncommercial, To register, Registry. The Noncommercial and Commercial Stakeholder Groups to together make up the âNon-contracting Parties Houseâ in the new bicameral GNSO; and the Registrarand Registry Stakeholder Groups will to together comprise the âContracting Parties Houseâin the new GNSO structure (beginning Oct. 2009). ICANN - for The Internet Corporation Assigned Names and Numbers For The Internet Corporation Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is an internationally organized, non-profit corporation that there are responsibility for Internet Protocol (IP) address space allocation, protocol to identifier assignment, generic (gTLD)and country code (ccTLD) Top-Level Domain Name System management, and root server system management functions âTop 10 Myths Civil About Society Participation in ICANNâby NCUC 5 NCUC - Noncommercial Users Constituency The Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC) is the home for noncommercial organizations and individuals in for the Internet Corporation Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO). Real With voting to power in ICANN policy making and Board selection, it develops and supports positions that protect noncommercial communication and activity on the Internet. NCUC works to promote the public interest in ICANN policy and is the only noncommercial constituency in ICANNâs GSNO(there plows 5 commercial constituencies). The NCUC is open to noncommercial organizations and individuals involved in education, community networking, public policy advocacy, development, promotion of the arts, digitalis rights, children's welfare, religion, to consumer protection, scientific research, human rights and many to other area. NCUC maintains to website AT http://ncdnhc.org. NCSG - Noncommercial Stakeholders Group The GNSO is in the process of being restructured from â6 constituenciesâ to â4 to stakeholder groupsâ, including to Noncommercial Stakeholders Group (NCSG) into which all noncommercial organizations and individuals will belong for policy development purposes, including members of the Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC). The NCSG and the Commercial Stakeholder Group (CSG) will to together comprise the âNon-contracting Parties Houseâ in the new bicameral GNSO structure beginning October 2009. LINKS TO BACKGROUND INFORMATION: NCUC Letter to ICANN Board and CEO on NCSG Controversy Charter: http://bit.ly/BiOg8 Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC): http://ncdnhc.org NCUC submitted NCSG proposal charter: http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/ncsg-petition-charter.pdf Robin Gross on âIs ICANN Accountable to the Public Interest?â: http://ipjustice.org/ICANN/NCSG/NCUC-ICANN-Injustices.html ICANN GNSO Chair Avri Doria on âWhy I Joined the NCUCâ: http://tiny.cc/EPDtx Internet Governance Project: â4 ICANN Board members dissentin votes on NCSG charterâ: http://tiny.cc/S5CjP 2006 London School of Economics Independent Report on GNSO: http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-15sep06.htm __________ NOD32 4357 (20090821) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/71240f8fb9.html --]]

2 1

Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?Recordatorio=�_Candidatos_de_LAC = =?iso-8859-1?q?RALO_para_la_posici=F3n_del_enlacede_la_tarjeta_de_ALAC=
by andrespiazzagpj＠hotmail.com Sept. 4, 2009

Sept. 4, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?Recordatorio=Á_Candidatos_de_LAC = =?iso-8859-1?q?RALO_para_la_posici=F3n_del_enlacede_la_tarjeta_de_ALAC= From: andrespiazzagpj(a)hotmail.com Dear Jose Luis, thanks for the contact. The Public Commentary of Post Expiration Domain Recovery overcomes day10 of September. Jose Maple, Fátima Cambronero and you is following the subject. I putthem in Vista to its electronic mails so that they can emit some uprising during the weekend so that we have in the list some contribution before the victory. It will be possible? http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#pednr Also each one for a reason or purpose individual can make contributions to the Public Comment. Greetings Andrés Piazza President of LACRALO > From: joseluis(a)barzallo.com > To: joseluis(a)barzallo.com; andrespiazzagpj(a)hotmail.com; lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: RE: [ lac-discuss-is ] Reminder: Candidates of LACRALO for the position of enlacede the ALAC card > Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:41:30 -0500 > > > Andrés > > This message that I sent and I do not have answer to you. I am going to follow with the subjects > but avísame if we have a special organization to the respect. > > warm Greetings, > > Jose Luis > > original -----Mensaje > Of: Jose Luis Barzallo [ mailto:joseluis@barzallo.com ] > Envoy: Monday, 31 of August of 2009 22:10 > For: ' Andres Piazzá; ' lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org' > Subject: RE: [ lac-discuss-is ] Reminder: Candidates of LACRALO for > position of enlacede the ALAC card > > Andrés > > In the last teleconferencing we talked on the support for the subjects > pending and my supply to collaborate. > > Tuve to leave the meeting before it finishes, you can indicat! e to me please > the conclusions and the subjects on which we are going to work in the next ones > days or weeks. > > warm Greetings, > > Jose Luis Barzallo > > AEDIT Ecuador > > www.aedit.org.ec > Columbus 535 and 6 of December. > Edif. Cristóbal Columbus Of. 602 > Telf: (593 2) 2528774/ 2544464 > Fax: 593 2 2564530 > email: joseluis(a)barzallo.com > Exempt Ecuador > > original -----Mensaje > Of: lac-discuss-it is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > [ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of Andres > Piazza > Envoy: Thursday, 20 of August of 2009 10:08 > For: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] Reminder: Candidates of LACRALO for > position of enlacede the ALAC card > > > > Considered: > I yesterday translated an announcement similar to the Spanish, on the selection of the member > of NomCom. > > Creo that the message is clear in this case. > > we only have to Vanda Scartezini like announced candidate! . There is more > interested? Remember that not only the possi! bility e xists of > autonominaciones, but that any member can name to others. > > Warm Greetings, > > Andrés Piazza > President of LACRALO > > > Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:48:43 -0700 > > From: admin(a)ttcsweb.org > > To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > CC: > > Subject: Reminder: Candidates of LACRALO for the position of enlacede > the ALAC card > > > > > > [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]] > > > > > > Subject: Reminder: Candidates of LACRALO for the position of enlacede > ALAC card > > Of: admin(a)ttcsweb.org > > > > Wanted All: > > > > LACRALO must up to 15 of September of 2009 endorse and putunder a list > of > > the names of the candidates for the ALAC raises the connection that represents > the ALAC and > > En-Grande in the level of the ICANN card. > > > > How the connection of the ALAC card will be chosen: > > > > the ALAC slightly adopted an amended process of the selection sto! ps > > Enlace of the card according to specified by the process 2009del connects > of the card > > (https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?board_liaison_process_2009) > > in its meeting of August of the 4. > > > > Each THIN one is asked for to send a list of names of thecandidates > that they have > > endorsed by the THIN one. The then ALAC will vote on the list of > > candidates using the system of voting of the instantaneous exit > > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting) > > which means that it will align each candidate, of preferred more a > > the minus preferred. > > > > Hour of the selection of Liasion of the ALAC card: > > > > During its meeting of August of the 4, the ALAC adopted the following schedule > > for the selection of the connection of the card: > > > > * the Appointments of THIN is even opened: the fifteenth September > > * The Lists Of The Candidate Published: 1! 7mo September > > * Called of conference of the candidate ! with the community: Entre18 - 20 Of > September > > * Period Of the Selection of ALAC: 21 - 30 of September > > * The Results Announced: 1r October > > > > Vea also process 2009 of the connection of the card > > ((https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?board_liaison_process_2009) > > for a detailed description of the process. > > > > > > Requisite and obligations of the connection of the ALAC card: > > > > For a description in the general obligations and requirements stops > ALAC > > the connection according to the specified thing by the arrangement instruments, > considers > > > https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?obligations_and_requirements_of_ala > c_liaisons > > > > the interested candidates can also wish to review documents > following: > > > > - the description of the position of the sketch for the members and > losenlaces of ALAC that was > > is prepared by the member Alan Greenberg of ALAC ! and at the moment opened > stops > > commentaries of theEn-Grande community: > > https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?draft_alac_pd > > > > - the level of the consolidation of the connection of thecard > > > https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?board_liaisons_election_2009_commitment_ > of_board_liaison > > according to the proposed message of the call of the selection for the connection > of the ALAC card > > > https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?Proposed%20Election%20Call%20Messag > e%20for%20ALAC%20Board%20Liaison > > > > > > the LACRALO participants can indicate their appointments anyone > using > > button of the commentary in wikis of LACRALO: > > https://st.icann.org/lacralo/index.cgi?2009_election_call_lacralo_en > > Or > > https://st.icann.org/lacralo/index.cgi?2009_election_call_lacralo_es > > Or > > uses ready Laca-Discuten of IN and of IT IS. > > > > > > Also, is other next select! ions, information can be found in > > https://st.icann.org! /lacralo /index.cgi?2009_election_call_lacralo_en > > (IN) or > > https://st.icann.org/lacralo/index.cgi?2009_election_call_lacralo_es (IT IS) > > > > Revealing T > > Secretariat of LACRALO > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > > http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/6273c4caè.html > > --]] > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es_atlarge-lists > icann.org > > http://www.lacralo.org > > __________ NOD32 4349 (20090819) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.eset.com > > ! > > > _________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/c55f6c42d2.html --]]

1 0

VOTE RESULT: LACRALO Vote on NomCom Delegate
by At-Large Staff Sept. 4, 2009

Sept. 4, 2009

Dear all, With 20 out of 31 eligible LACRALO Members having voted in the recent vote on the LACRALO Recommendation for the Latin American and Carribbean NomCom delegate, we can confirm that the result is quorate. ******************* Regional NomCom Delegate Who should LACRALO recommend that the ALAC appoint as the NomCom representative from the Latin American and Carribean Region, for a term running from the end of the 2009 AGM to the end of the 2010 AGM? As at Poll close: Wednesday 02 September 2009 23:59 UTC Number of voters: 20 · Electorate size: 31 · Percentage voted: 64.52 Cintra Sooknanan: 4 (20.00%) José Ovidio Salgueiro: 11 (55.00%) Abstain: 5 (25.00%) ********************* You may verify the results independently under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=CgaJbQRxz7gTAmSTcbXq ******************** Eligible voters who participated in the vote (20/31): Aislan Vargas Basilio Sergio Walter Salinas Porto Alberto Soto Sebastian Bellagamba Raul Bauer Omar Kaminski Humberto Carrasco José Luis Barzallo Lance Hinds Dev Anand Teelucksingh Horacio Martin Fernandez Delpech Antonio Medina Gomez Roosvelt O. King Andrés Piazza Javier Eduardo Chandía Rojas Cristian Casas Erik Huesca Leopold Brandt Graterol Carlton Samuels Sylvia Herlein Leite ************************** Eligible Voters who did not participate in the vote (11/31): James Corbin Steven A. Williams Wladimir Davalos Carlton Stewart Maria de la Paz Silva Contreras Johnny Laureano Danny Jaggernauth Sergio Bronstein Carlos Vera Erick Iriarte Ahon Melody Palmer -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff at atlarge.icann.org

6 5

Re: [lac-discuss-en] RESULT OF THE VOTE: Vote of LACRALO in the delegate of NomCom
by hcarrasco＠areajuridica.cl Sept. 4, 2009

Sept. 4, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Vote of LACRALO in the delegate of NomCom From: hcarrasco(a)areajuridica.cl Congratulations JO... A hug from Chile staff(a)atlarge.icann.org wrote: > [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]] > > > Subject: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Vote of LACRALO in the delegate of NomCom > Of: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > Wanted all, > > With 20 outside 31 elegibles members of LACRALO that vote inthe recent vote > in the recommendation of LACRALO for the Latin American and the Caribbean NomCom > delegate, we can confirm that the result is quorate. > > ******************* > > Regional Delegate De NomCom > > Who if LACRALO recommends that the ALAC designate like the NomCom > representing of the Latin American and the region of Carribean, for a term > executing itself of the end of the 2009 AGM at the end of the 2010 AGM? > > As in the closing of the survey: UTC Of Wednesday The 02 Of September 2009 Of 23:59 > Number of voters: 20 · The electorate classifies: 31 · Voted percentage: 64.52 > > Sooknanan Arch: 4 (20.00%) > Jose Ovid Salgueiro: 11 (55.00%) > Abstenga: 5 (25.00! %) > > ********************* > > You can verify the results independently underneath: > https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=CgaJbQRxz7gTAmSTcbXq > > ******************** > > Voting elegibles that participated in the vote (20/31): > > Aislan Vargas Basilio > Saline I carry De Sergio Walter > Alberto Grove > Sebastian Bellagamba > Raul Bauer > Omar Kaminski > Humberto Carrasco > Jose Luis Barzallo > Lanza Hinds > Revealing Anand Teelucksingh > Horacio Martin Fernandez Delpech > Antonio Medina Gomez > Roosvelt Or King > Seat of Andrés > Javier Eduardo Red Chandía > Houses De Cristian > Erik Huesca > Leopold Brandt Graterol > Carlton Samuels > Sylvia Herlein Leite > > ************************** > > Voting elegibles that did not participate in the vote (11/31): > > James Corbin > Steven To Williams > Wladimir Davalos > Carlton Stewart > Maria of La Paz Silva Contreras > Johnny Laureano > Danny Jag! gernauth > Sergio Bronstein > Carlos Side > Erick Iria! rte Ahon > Melodía Palmer > > -- > Respect, > > Ashton-Ciervo Of Mella, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger,Gisella Gruber-Blanco > Personal En-Grande of ICANN > email: personnel in atlarge.icann.org > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/157423f106.html > --]] > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es_atlarge-list… > > http://www.lacralo.org _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/839693543a.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] VANDA SCARTEZINI = liaison ALAC-BOARD
by presidencia＠internauta.org.ar Sept. 4, 2009

Sept. 4, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: VANDA SCARTEZINI = liaison ALAC-BOARD From: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar I agree with vos in everything what you put on vanda sylvia dear, warm greetings Sergio Original Message From: <sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> To: <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 5:28 P.m. Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] VANDA SCARTEZINI = liaison ALAC-BOARD Dear companions of LACRALO, Vanda Scartezini she is the candidate who is name by our region like LIAISON with the Board. It does not require presentation because from long before which the LACRALO existed, Vanda he was present in ICANN and it continues it being until the present. It participates in all the teleconferencings, in several work groups, speak Portuguese, ingles, French and Spanish. Also he knows very well all the members Board, to the leaders of the other 4 THIN ones... It knows to listen and one becomes to listen when it is necessary... By all that and much more, Iconsider that Vanda is the ideal candidate for this important function of connection between the ALAC and the Board of ICANN Greetings, Sylvia Herlein Leite ENGLISH Dear lacralo fellows, Vanda Scartezini is the candidate who you have been nominated by our region ace to LIAISON with the Board. She does not require to be introduces, since long before the LACRALO exist, Vanda was present AT ICANN and remains to this day. She participate in all conference calls, in several working groups, speaks Portuguese, English, French andSpanish. She is also very well known to all members of the Board, leaders of the to other 4 THIN... Good to listener and dog be heard when necessary... For all this and believe dwells I that ideal Vanda is the candidate for this important liaison function and between the ALAC the ICANN Board. Regards, Sylvia Herlein Leite _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/6c1dbed472.html --]]

3 2

Support to Vanda Scartezini Board ICANN.Lacralo
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org Sept. 3, 2009

Sept. 3, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Support to Vanda Scartezini Board ICANN.Lacralo From: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org Considered, we know the participation discharge Vanda, and therefore its great one dedication. In addition in all his interventions it has left very clear his professionalism. We trusted its management, reason by which totally, we supported its postulation to the position of the Board of ICANN. Warm greetings Dr Alberto Grove Director IIISI Original Message From: "Antonio Medina Go'mez" <amedinagomez(a)gmail.com> To: <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 12:41 P.m. Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] Support of ACUI to Vanda Scartezini Board ICANN.Lacralo Considered all. There are occasions in which it is necessary to express the endorsement publicly to talent, to the professional formation and the ability to work of some person. In this case I want to show the support of the Colombian Association of Users of Internet to Vanda to the position of the Board de Icann. In city of Mexico I had the opportunity of platicar in several opportunities with her, not only on own questions of the Summit but on other thematic ones, which I help myself to value to Vanda in an ample dimension, like professional and the most valuable quota of Latin Americain the Board of Icann. "Internet is a portentoso instrument to the service of the economic development and social of citizens and countries ". I identify myself withher in this sense and I believe that towards this objective their performances will be oriented. Associate its leaf of life for the interested ones in knowing on Vandawith but detail. Warm greeting Antonio Medina Go'mez President Colombian association of Users of Internet * Vanda Scartezini * Vanda Scartezini is an electronics engineer and a Brazilian citizen, and it graduated as the university in 1970. Since then it has occupied positions of direction with many companies of technology of private institutions and public. She is the Co-founder and has been an active partner in the Pole Consultants, a company of consultancy of YOU of Brazil, from 1985. Also he acts like President of Altis, a software and services outsourcing, www.altis.org.br, and like president of the Meeting of FITEC, a R & TIC www.fitec.org.br Foundation D. She is also associated member of Projects of the Getulio Foundation Vargas (www.fgvprojetos.fgv.br) and member of board of directors of the ABES, the Association of the Brazilian Industry of Software. One evolved like National Secretary of Industrial Technology, and like National secretary of Technologies of the Information in the Federal Government of Brazil. Also he is previous president of the Brazilian Office of Patents. As of 2000 until March of 2004 he was the representative Brazilian in the Governmental Advisory Committee of ICANN. Also one evolved like Vice-president GAC until March of 2004. She has acted like representative of the Government of Brazil in many missions international anywhere in the world, as well as an expert and consultant of international institutions. She was honest with many of the great prizes of the Brazilian industry of YOU. It is also member of honor of Abranet, Brazilian Association MX, and of the Brazilian Cameraof Commerce Electronic. Among other associations of the TIC, that is also a member of WTN - World Technology Network, www.wtn.net. Scartezini was chosen like member of the Meeting of the ICANN in December of 2004. Its mandate of three years finished with the annual meeting of the ICANN in November of 2007. _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/653000fff2.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] RESULT OF THE VOTE: Vote of LACRALO in the delegate of NomCom
by hfernandez＠hfernandezdelpech.com.ar Sept. 3, 2009

Sept. 3, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Vote of LACRALO in the delegate of NomCom From: to hfernandez(a)hfernandezdelpech.com.ar Dear Jose Ovid In my name and the one of the Association of Computer science Right of Argentina, my sincere congratulations and desires of exito, that discountsyou will have Dr Horacio Fernandez Delpech President of the Association of Deecho Informatico of Argentina Original Message From: <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> To: <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 5:20 A.M. Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] RESULT Of the VOTE: Vote of LACRALO in the delegate of NomCom > > [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]] > > > Subject: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Vote of LACRALO in the delegateof NomCom > Of: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > Wanted all, > > With 20 outside 31 elegibles members of LACRALO that vote inthe vote > recent > in the recommendation of LACRALO for the Latin American and the Caribbean > NomCom > delegate, we can confirm that the result is quorate. > > ******************* > > Regional Delegate De NomCom > > Who if LACRALO recommends that the ALAC designate like the NomCom > representing of the Latin American and the region of Carribean, for > term > executing itself of the end of the 2009 AGM at the end of the 2010 AGM? > > As in the closing of the survey: UTC Of Wednesday The 02 Of September > 2009 Of 23:59 > Number of voters: 20 · The electorate classifies: 31 · > voted Percentage: 64.52 > > Sooknanan Arch: 4 (20.00%) > Jose Ovid Salgueiro: 11 (55.00%) > Abstenga: 5 (25.00%) > > ********************* > > You can v! erify the results independently underneath: > https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=CgaJbQRxz7gTAmSTcbXq > > ******************** > > Voting elegibles that participated in the vote (20/31): > > Aislan Vargas Basilio > Saline I carry De Sergio Walter > Alberto Grove > Sebastian Bellagamba > Raul Bauer > Omar Kaminski > Humberto Carrasco > Jose Luis Barzallo > Lanza Hinds > Revealing Anand Teelucksingh > Horacio Martin Fernandez Delpech > Antonio Medina Gomez > Roosvelt Or King > Seat of Andrés > Javier Eduardo Red Chandía > Houses De Cristian > Erik Huesca > Leopold Brandt Graterol > Carlton Samuels > Sylvia Herlein Leite > > ************************** > > Voting elegibles that did not participate in the vote (11/31): > > James Corbin > Steven To Williams > Wladimir Davalos > Carlton Stewart > Maria of La Paz Silva Contreras > Johnny Laureano > Danny Jaggernauth > Sergio Bronstein > Carlos Side > Erick Iriarte Ahon > Melodía Palmer > > -- > Respect, > > Ashton-Ciervo Of ! Mella, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger,Gisella > Gruber-B! lanco > Personal En-Grande of ICANN > email: personnel in atlarge.icann.org > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/157423f106.html > --]] > > > > > > > __________ Information of ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of the base of > companies of virus 4390 (20090902) __________ > > ESET NOD32 Antivirus has verified east message. > > http://www.eset.com > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es_atlarge-list… > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > __________ Information of ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of the base of > companies of virus 4390 (20090902) __________ > > ESET NOD32 Antivirus has verified east message. > > http://www.eset.com > > _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/b732546431.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] HEAD OF CATTLE: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Vote of LACRALO in eldelegadode NomCom
by joseluis＠barzallo.com Sept. 3, 2009

Sept. 3, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: HEAD OF CATTLE: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Vote of LACRALO in eldelegadode NomCom From: joseluis(a)barzallo.com Dear Jose Ovid Many luck and we are sure that you will represent to us of the best way. Any aid or support counts on the AEDIT. Warm greetings, Jose Luis AEDIT Columbus 535 and 6 of December. Edif. Cristóbal Columbus Of. 602 Telf: (593 2) 2528774/ 2544464 Fax: 593 2 2564530 Email: joseluis(a)barzallo.com Quito Ecuador Original -----Mensaje Of: lac-discuss-it is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of Antonio Medina Go'mez Sent: Thursday, 03 of September of 2009 8:07 It stops: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] HEAD OF CATTLE: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Vote of LACRALO in eldelegadode NomCom Jose Ovid rebe a warm and special greeting in this stage of challenges, opportunities and of great responsibility. Account with the support of ACUI for accomplishment of your tasks. Congratulations and successes in your management. Sincerely Antonio Medina Go'mez President Colombian association of Users of Internet The 3 of September of 2009 07:38, sylvia@prontocl <sylvia(a)prontocl.com.br>it wrote: > CONGRATULATIONS JOSE! > > Sylvia Herlein Leite > > -----Mensagem original > Of: lac-discuss-it is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > [ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org ] command post nome of > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > Shipment command post: fifth-feira, 3 of setembro of 2009 05:21 > For: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Assunto: [ lac-discuss-is ] RESULT Of the VOTE: Vote of LACRALO in > delegadode NomCom > > > [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]] > > > Subject: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Vote of LACRALO in the delegateof NomCom > Of: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > Wanted all, > > With 20 outside 31 elegibles members of LACRALO that vote inthe vote > recent in the recommendation of LACRALO for the American andthe Caribbean > Latin delegated NomCom, we can confirm that the result is quorate. > > ******************* > > Regional Delegate De NomCom > > Who if LACRALO recommends that the ALAC designate like the NomCom > representing of the Latin Amer! ican and the region of Carribean, for > term executing itself of the end of the 2009 AGM at the end of the 2010 AGM? > > As in the closing of the survey: UTC Of Wednesday The 02 Of September 2009 > Of 23:59 Number of voters: 20 · The electorate classifies: 31 > · Voted percentage: 64.52 > > Sooknanan Arch: 4 (20.00%) > Jose Ovid Salgueiro: 11 (55.00%) > Abstenga: 5 (25.00%) > > ********************* > > You can verify the results independently underneath: > https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=CgaJbQRxz7gTAmSTcbXq > > ******************** > > Voting elegibles that participated in the vote (20/31): > > Aislan Vargas Basilio > Saline I carry De Sergio Walter > Alberto Grove > Sebastian Bellagamba > Raul Bauer > Omar Kaminski > Humberto Carrasco > Jose Luis Barzallo > Lanza Hinds > Revealing Anand Teelucksingh > Horacio Martin Fernandez Delpech > Antonio Medina Gomez > Roosvelt Or King > Seat of Andrés > Javier Eduardo Red Chandía > Houses De Cristian > Erik Huesca > Leopold Brandt Graterol > Carlton Samuels > Sylvia Herlein Leite > > ************************** > > Voting elegibles that did not participate in the vote (11/31): > > James Corbin > ! Steven To Williams > Wladimir Davalos > Carlton Stewart > Maria of La Paz Silva Contreras > Johnny Laureano > Danny Jaggernauth > Sergio Bronstein > Carlos Side > Erick Iriarte Ahon > Melodía Palmer > > -- > Respect, > > Ashton-Ciervo Of Mella, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella > Personal Gruber-Blanco En-Grande of ICANN > email: personnel in atlarge.icann.org > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/157423f106.html > --]] > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es_atlarge-lists icann.org > > http://www.lacralo.org > _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/ff46fea9ea.html --]]

1 0

Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?Recordatorio=�_Candidatos_de_LAC = =?iso-8859-1?q?RALO_para_la_posici=F3n_del_enlacede_la_tarjeta_de _ = =?iso-8859-1?q?ALAC =
by joseluis＠barzallo.com Sept. 3, 2009

Sept. 3, 2009

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?Recordatorio=Á_Candidatos_de_LAC = =?iso-8859-1?q?RALO_para_la_posici=F3n_del_enlacede_la_tarjeta_de _ = =?iso-8859-1?q?ALAC = From: joseluis(a)barzallo.com Andrés This message that I sent and I do not have answer to you. I am going to follow with the subjects but avísame if we have a special organization to the respect. Warm greetings, Jose Luis Original -----Mensaje Of: Jose Luis Barzallo [ mailto:joseluis@barzallo.com ] Sent: Monday, 31 of August of 2009 22:10 It stops: ' Andres Piazzá; ' lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org' Subject: RE: [ lac-discuss-is ] Reminder: Candidates of LACRALO for position of enlacede the ALAC card Andrés In the last teleconferencing we talked on the support for the subjects slopes and my supply to collaborate. I had to leave the meeting before it finishes, you can indicate to me please the conclusions and the subjects on which we are going to workin the next ones days or weeks. Warm greetings, Jose Luis Barzallo AEDIT Ecuador www.aedit.org.ec Columbus 535 and 6 of December. Edif. Cristóbal Columbus Of. 602 Telf: (593 2) 2528774/ 2544464 Fax: 593 2 2564530 Email: joseluis(a)barzallo.com Quito Ecuador Original -----Mensaje Of: lac-discuss-it is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of Andres Piazza Sent: Thursday, 20 of August of 2009 10:08 It stops: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] Reminder: Candidates of LACRALO for position of enlacede the ALAC card Considered: I yesterday translated an announcement similar to the Spanish, on the selection of the member of NomCom. I believe that the message is clear in this case. We only have to Vanda Scartezini like announced candidate. There is more interested? Remember that not only the possibility exists of autonominaciones, but that any member can name to others. Warm Greetings, Andrés Piazza President of LACRALO > Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:48:43 -0700 > From: admin(a)ttcsweb.org > To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > CC: > Subject: Reminder: Candidates of LACRALO for the position of enlacede the ALAC card > > > [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]] > > > Subject: Reminder: Candidates of LACRALO for the position ofenlacede ALAC card > Of: admin(a)ttcsweb.org > > Wanted All: > > LACRALO must up to 15 of September of 2009 endorse and put under a list of > the names of the candidates for the ALAC raise the connection that represents the ALAC and > En-Grande in the level of the ICANN card. > > How the connection of the ALAC card will be chosen: > > the ALAC slightly adopted an amended process of the selection stops > Enlace of the card according to specified by the process 2009del connects of the card > (https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?board_liaison_process_2009) > in its meeting of August of the 4. > > Each THIN one is asked for to send a list of names of the candidates that they have > endorsed by the THIN one. The then ALAC will vote on the list of > candidates using the system of voting of the instantaneous exit > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting) > which means that it will align each candidate, of preferred more a > the minus preferred. > > Hour of the selection of Liasion of the ALAC card: > > During its meeting of August of the 4, the ALAC adopted the following schedule > for the selection of the connection of the card: > > * the Appointments of THIN are even opened: the fifteenth September > * The Lists Of The Candidate Published: 17mo September > * Called of conference of the candidate with the community: Entre18 - 20 Of September > * Period Of the Selection of ALAC: 21 - 30 of September > * The Results Announced: 1r October > > Vea also process 2009 of the connection of the card > ((https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?board_liaison_process_2009) > for a detailed description of the process. > > > Requisite and obligations of the connection of the ALAC card: > > For a description in the general obligations and requirements stops ALAC > the connection according to the specified thing by the arrangement instruments, it considers > https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?obligations_and_requirements_of_ala c_liaisons > > the interested candidates can also wish to review documents following: > > - the description of the position of the sketch for the members and losenlaces of ALAC that was > is prepared by the member Alan Greenberg of ALAC and at themoment opened it stops > commentaries of theEn-Grande community: > https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?draft_alac_pd > > - the level of the consolidation of the connection of the card > https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?board_liaisons_election_2009_commitment_ of_board_liaison > according to the proposed message of the call of the selection for the connection of the ALAC card > https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?Proposed%20Election%20Call%20Messag e%20for%20ALAC%20Board%20Liaison > > > the LACRALO participants can indicate their appointments anyone using > button of the commentary in wikis of LACRALO: > https://st.icann.org/lacralo/index.cgi?2009_election_call_lacralo_en > Or > https://st.icann.org/lacralo/index.cgi?2009_election_call_lacralo_es > Or > uses ready Laca-Discuten of IN and of IT IS. > > > Also, is other next selections, information can be found in > https://st.icann.org/lacralo/index.cgi?2009_election_call_lacralo_en > (IN) or > https://st.icann.org/lacralo/index.cgi?2009_election_call_lacralo_es (IT IS) > > Revealing T > Secretariat of LACRALO > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/6273c4caè.html > --]] > > > _________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/c3b9fffcc5.html --]]

1 0