December 2010 - lac-discuss-en

Brazil: Indigenous communities reflect on using the internet
by Cintra Sooknanan Dec. 22, 2010

Dec. 22, 2010

Hi, I came across this article, not sure if Sylvia may have more information on the outcome of the Symposium to share with us. Excerpt: In the end of November, the city of Sao Paulo hosted the 1st Symposium On Indigenous Uses of the Internet <http://www.usp.br/nhii/simposio/> [pt], an event organized by the Center for Indigenous History and Indigenous Studies at the Federal University of Sao Paulo to assess how indigenous communities were using the internet in Brazil. Delegates of 16 indigenous ethnicities from many parts of the country attended the event, the majority of whom have already been using the Internet to seek improvements for their people. Bringing the experience of an indigenous people that has benefited most<http://globalvoicesonline.org/2010/08/14/brazil-the-indigenous-the-internet…> from digital technologies to promote political action, Almir Surui Narayamoga, leader of the Paiter Surui People <http://www.paiter.org/index_en.shtml>, considered this debate of theutmost importance<http://chsurui.blogspot.com/2010/12/uso-de-internet-pelas-comunidades.html> [pt] for everyone: A internet tem grande importância na luta social e ambiental dos povos indígenas. The Internet plays an important role in the social and environmental struggles of indigenous peoples. Full Article at: http://globalvoicesonline.org/2010/12/18/brazil-indigenous-communities-refl… Regard Cintra

1 0

Net Neutrality You Say?
by Carlton Samuels Dec. 21, 2010

Dec. 21, 2010

The story is becoming even more complex.... http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/21/business/media/21fcc.html?hp Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround =============================

1 0

Companies in Venezuela.
by cveraq＠gmail.com Dec. 18, 2010

Dec. 18, 2010

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Companies in Venezuela. From: cveraq(a)gmail.com For those who esten interested in this process in Venezuela them step the following connection: http://www.fayerwayer.com/2010/12/venezuela-gather-company-virtual-by-a-"internet-of-containing-libre"/ Carlos Side Message sent from my terminal BlackBerry® de Porta _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/73c9383e4b.html --]]

2 1

=?iso-8859-1?q?Lista_de_temas_disponibles_para_C = =?iso-8859-1?q?omentario_P=FAblico =
by fatimacambronero＠gmail.com Dec. 17, 2010

Dec. 17, 2010

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?Lista_de_temas_disponibles_para_C = =?iso-8859-1?q?omentario_P=FAblico = From: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com Considered, I share with you the list of the subjects that are subject to Commentary Public in ICANN, and in which, each one of us we can think, as much for a reason or purpose individual, as in respective name of our ALSs. Many of these documents are in different languages, not only in English, but also in Spanish, French, etc., which facilitates the understanding stops those that we do not have like native language, to the English. I consider important, if it is within our possibilities and of ours interest, to take a time us to analyze some of these subjects and to share with the other members of LACRALO, the conclusions at which wearrive, already that this way, we are not only participating, but also doing something of the ' Inreach' of that as much we spoke before and during Cartagena. A pleasure went to know many personally of you. Warm greetings, Fátima Cambronero * 1) Review of IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#fast-track-review-2010 It closes: 17 of December of 2010. * 2) Final Draft Report on Policy Aspects Regarding Introduction of Single Character IDN TLDs * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#jig-draft-end-report It closes: 30 of December of 2010. * 3) JAS WG Milestone Report and Accompanying Addenda * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#jas-milestone-report Extended until the 10 of January of 2011. * 4) Draft 2011-2014 Strategic Plan * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#draft-strat-2011 It closes: 10 of January of 2011. * 5) ccNSO Review - Draft Working Group Report * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#ccnso-review-draft-end-report It closes: 15 of January of 2011. * 6) Interim Paper Inclusion of IDN ccTLD's in the ccNSO * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#idn-cctld-ccnso It closes: 21 of January of 2011. * 7) Proposed Changes to Enhance ICANN's Registrar Accreditation Evaluation Process * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#registrar-accredit-eval It closes: 21 of January of 2011. * 8) New Not-for-Profit Organizations Constituency Petition and Charter * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#npoc-petition-charter It closes: 23 of January of 2011. * 9) Permanent Charter of GNSÃs Commercial Stakeholder Group Completed - Public Comment Invited * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#csg-permanent-charter It closes: 23 of January of 2011. * 10) TLG Review - Final Report * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#tlg-end-report It closes: 24 of January of 2011. * 11) Interim Report of Geographic Regions Review Working Group * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#geo-regions-interim-report It closes: 30 of January of 2011. * 12) Interim Report of the Internationalized Registration Data Working Group * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#ird Extended up to 14 of March of 2011. * 13) Accountability & Transparency Review - Community Feedback * In process. Source: ICANN Public Comment http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/ -- * FÃ¡tima Cambronero * Lawyer-Argentina President Ageia Densi http://ar.ageiadensi.org/ _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4e9ee70e39.html --]]

1 0

=?iso-8859-1?q?Lista_de_temas_disponibles_para_C = =?iso-8859-1?q?omentario_P=FAblico =
by fatimacambronero＠gmail.com Dec. 17, 2010

Dec. 17, 2010

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?Lista_de_temas_disponibles_para_C = =?iso-8859-1?q?omentario_P=FAblico = From: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com Considered, I share with you the list of the subjects that are available stops Public commentary in ICANN, and in which, each one of us we can to think, as much for a reason or purpose individual, as in name of our respective ones ALSs. Many of these documents are in different languages, not only in English, but also in Spanish, French, etc., which facilitates the understanding stops those that we do not have like native language, to the English. I consider important, if it is within our possibilities and of ours interest, to take a time us to analyze some of these subjects and to share with the other members of LACRALO, the conclusions at which wearrive, already that this way, we are not only participating, but also doing something of the ' Inreach' of that as much we spoke before and during Cartagena. A pleasure went to know many personally of you. Warm greetings, Fátima Cambronero * 1) Review of IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#fast-track-review-2010 It closes: 17 of December of 2010. * 2) Final Draft Report on Policy Aspects Regarding Introduction of Single Character IDN TLDs * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#jig-draft-end-report It closes: 30 of December of 2010. * 3) JAS WG Milestone Report and Accompanying Addenda * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#jas-milestone-report Extended until the 10 of January of 2011. * 4) Draft 2011-2014 Strategic Plan * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#draft-strat-2011 It closes: 10 of January of 2011. * 5) ccNSO Review - Draft Working Group Report * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#ccnso-review-draft-end-report It closes: 15 of January of 2011. * 6) Interim Paper Inclusion of IDN ccTLD's in the ccNSO * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#idn-cctld-ccnso It closes: 21 of January of 2011. * 7) Proposed Changes to Enhance ICANN's Registrar Accreditation Evaluation Process * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#registrar-accredit-eval It closes: 21 of January of 2011. * 8) New Not-for-Profit Organizations Constituency Petition and Charter * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#npoc-petition-charter It closes: 23 of January of 2011. * 9) Permanent Charter of GNSÃs Commercial Stakeholder Group Completed - Public Comment Invited * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#csg-permanent-charter It closes: 23 of January of 2011. * 10) TLG Review - Final Report * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#tlg-end-report It closes: 24 of January of 2011. * 11) Interim Report of Geographic Regions Review Working Group * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#geo-regions-interim-report It closes: 30 of January of 2011. * 12) Interim Report of the Internationalized Registration Data Working Group * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#ird Extended up to 14 of March of 2011. * 13) Accountability & Transparency Review - Community Feedback * In process. Source: ICANN Public Comment http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/ -- * FÃ¡tima Cambronero * Lawyer-Argentina President Ageia Densi http://ar.ageiadensi.org/ _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/50b0ce967b.html --]]

1 0

Lista de temas disponibles para Comentario Público
by Fatima Cambronero Dec. 17, 2010

Dec. 17, 2010

Estimados, Comparto con ustedes la lista de los temas que están disponibles para Comentario Público en ICANN, y en los cuales, cada uno de nosotros podemos opinar, tanto a título individual, como en nombre de nuestras respectivas ALSs. Muchos de estos documentos están en diferentes idiomas, no sólo en inglés, sino también en español, francés, etc., lo cual facilita la comprensión para los que no tenemos como lengua nativa, al inglés. Considero importante, si está dentro de nuestras posibilidades y de nuestro interés, tomarnos un tiempo para analizar alguno de estos temas y compartir con los demás miembros de LACRALO, las conclusiones a las que arribemos, ya que de esta manera, no sólo estamos participando, sino también haciendo algo del ‘Inreach’ del que tanto hablamos antes y durante Cartagena. Fue un placer conocer personalmente a muchos de ustedes. Saludos cordiales, Fátima Cambronero *1) Review of IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process* http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#fast-track-review-2010 Cierra: 17 de Diciembre de 2010. *2) Draft Final Report on Policy Aspects Regarding Introduction of Single Character IDN TLDs* http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#jig-draft-final-report Cierra: 30 de Diciembre de 2010. *3) JAS WG Milestone Report and Accompanying Addenda* http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#jas-milestone-report Extendido hasta el 10 de Enero de 2011. *4) Draft 2011-2014 Strategic Plan* http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#draft-strat-2011 Cierra: 10 de Enero de 2011. *5) ccNSO Review – Draft Working Group Report* http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#ccnso-review-draft-final-report Cierra: 15 de Enero de 2011. *6) Interim Paper Inclusion of IDN ccTLD's in the ccNSO* http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#idn-cctld-ccnso Cierra: 21 de Enero de 2011. *7) Proposed Changes to Enhance ICANN's Registrar Accreditation Evaluation Process* http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#registrar-accredit-eval Cierra: 21 de Enero de 2011. *8) New Not-for-Profit Organizations Constituency Petition and Charter* http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#npoc-petition-charter Cierra: 23 de Enero de 2011. *9) Permanent Charter of GNSO's Commercial Stakeholder Group Completed – Public Comment Invited* http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#csg-permanent-charter Cierra: 23 de Enero de 2011. *10) TLG Review – Final Report* http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#tlg-final-report Cierra: 24 de Enero de 2011. *11) Interim Report of Geographic Regions Review Working Group* http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#geo-regions-interim-report Cierra: 30 de Enero de 2011. *12) Interim Report of the Internationalized Registration Data Working Group * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#ird Extendido hasta 14 de Marzo de 2011. *13) Accountability & Transparency Review – Community Feedback* En proceso. Fuente: ICANN Public Comment http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/ -- *Fátima Cambronero* Abogada-Argentina Presidenta Ageia Densi http://ar.ageiadensi.org/

1 0

Fwd: [ALAC] WG: Re: [IRP] FW: [URGENT] Internet Censorship in Venezuela. Bill on Social Responsibly of Internet service providers and electronic media + Creation of National Internet Exchange Point
by Cintra Sooknanan Dec. 17, 2010

Dec. 17, 2010

Dear All, This is a serious issue which requires our urgent action, as it limits freedom of speech (and by extension to access of information). The link below gives a release by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights http://www.cidh.oas.org/Comunicados/English/2010/122-10eng.htm I hope you will all take the time to read this article and the email below, and perhaps we can also issue a press release or sign a petition against the proclamation of these Legislative Acts. Looking forward to your kind and urgent attention. Cintra <http://www.cidh.oas.org/Comunicados/English/2010/122-10eng.htm> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <admin(a)ttcsweb.org>wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Wolf Ludwig <wolf.ludwig(a)comunica-ch.net> > Date: Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:05 AM > Subject: [ALAC] WG: Re: [IRP] FW: [URGENT] Internet Censorship in > Venezuela. Bill on Social Responsibly of Internet service providers and > electronic media + Creation of National Internet Exchange Point > To: At-Large Worldwide <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Cc: Ginger Paque <gpaque(a)gmail.com> > > > Dear all, > > this is another alarming information from the IRP list from Ginger. May be > our friends from LACRALO can follow-up on this. > > Kind regards, > Wolf > > > Ginger Paque wrote Thu, 16 Dec 2010 07:06: > > Hi Lisa and all, > > > > There are two troubling projects in current discussion in the > Venezuelan parliament, the one Lisa mentions, and one seeking new > Internet regulations. They are both likely to pass this week. These merit > international review and discussion: > > > > After Legislative Setback, Venezuela's Chavez Plans to Legislate by > Decree > >http://www.laht.com/article.asp?ArticleId=381328&CategoryId=10718 > > Chavez announced that he will ask his lame-duck National Assembly > (where he will lose his unchallenged majority on January 5) to pass an > “Enabling Law” that will allow him to dictate by decree for 18 months -- > bypassing the incoming Opposition legislators. ... > > ... > > In the next 165-member National Assembly, the ruling party will have > the majority of lawmakers but not, as it has had up to now, the > two-thirds majority necessary to approve organic laws or extraordinary > measures such as granting special powers to the president. > > > > A Venezuelan newspaper account: Venezuelan govn't seeks media > law to regulate the Internet > > > http://english.eluniversal.com/2010/12/10/en_pol_esp_venezuelan-govnt-se_10… > > > > Global Voices has a comment on the Resorte (Internet law) here, > although it does not take into account yesterdays discussions: > > > http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/2010/12/12/venezuela-law-for-interne… > > > > > > > > Ginger (Virginia) Paque > > IGCBP Online Coordinator > > DiploFoundation > > www.diplomacy.edu/ig > > > > The latest from Diplo... > > http://igbook.diplomacy.edu is the online > companion to An Introduction to Internet Governance, Diplo's > publication on IG. Download the book, read the blogs and > post your comments. > > > > > > On 12/16/2010 5:44 AM, Lisa Horner wrote: > Hi all > > > > > > > > Please see below information about the worrying bills > that have been presented in Venezuela. Is there anything we can > do on this? > > > > > > > > Apologies for cross posting. > > > > > > > > All the best, > > > > Lisa > > > > > > > > From: Pedro Less Andrade [mailto: > pedroless(a)google.com] > > Sent: 15 December 2010 23:34 > > To: Kurt Opsahl; <katitza(a)eff.org>; Sonja > Gittens-Ottley; Sebastian Bellagamba; Raúl Echeberría; > Alejandro Pisanty; OscarM; Cynthia Wong; Ruth Puente; Lisa > Horner > > Subject: Re: [URGENT] Internet Censorship in > Venezuela. Bill on Social Responsibly of Internet service > providers and electronic media + Creation of National Internet > Exchange Point > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights > (IACHR) and its Office of the Special Rapporteur on > Freedom of Expression just sent a press release today on > the Venezuelan issue. > > > > > http://www.cidh.oas.org/Comunicados/English/2010/122-10eng.htm > > > > > http://www.cidh.oas.org/Comunicados/Spanish/2010/122-10sp.htm > > > > > > > > It has very good paragraphs on freedom of > expression and Internet. > > > > > > > > Please, circulate this among your > contacts and the Internet community. > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > Pedro > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Pedro > Less Andrade <pedroless(a)google.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > > > You might > heard about these two bills that are going to be > debated at Venezuela National Assembly next Tuesday. > Those represent a serious threat to free expression > online. It will be interesting the possibility > to have a strong coordinated response from the > Internet Community. > > > > > > > > Please find > below a report that I prepared about the two bills: > > > > > > > > On > December 10, we learned about a two new attempts to > censor Internet in Venezuela: > > > > > > > > 1. A > new bill that will go to parliament next week to > amend the Law of Social Responsibly for Radio and > Television and adds special provisions for Internet > service providers and electronic media. Please > find the text of the bill here from the National > Assembly website (also attached). The National > Assembly scheduled the debate of the new bill > for Tuesday December 14. > > > > > > > > 2. > There is another bill to reform the National > Organic Telecommunications Law. Section 212 of the > bill established a National Internet Exchange Point > (IPX or NAP). This will be a way for the > government to have a centralized Internet point of > access to the country an control the traffic get in > and out of the country. Please find the > bill here (also attached). > > > > > > > > Manuel > Villalba, a lawmaker from President Hugo Chavez's > Socialist Party, said the law was aimed at > protecting citizens. > > > > "Nowhere is the > restriction of access to the Internet > suggested. There should just exist > protection of citizens' moral and ethical > honor," said Villalba, who heads the National > Assembly's media commission. > > > > > > > > > > The bill allows the > government to restrict access to websites if > they are found to be distributing messages or > information that incite violence against the > president. The bill also applies limits on > content in "electronic media" according to the > time of day, with adult content reserved for > programing after midnight. > > > > > > > > > > I made a preliminary assessment of both bills: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. About the Bill on Social Responsibly: > > > > > > > > > > Section 1: The "purpose" of the bill is > to establish the social > responsibility of providers of radio and > television services, Internet service providers > and electronic media, advertisers, independent > national produces, and users to promote > democratic equilibrium between their > > > > duties, > rights and interests for the purposes > of promote social justice and contribute > to citizenship formation, democracy, > peace, human rights, culture, education, health > and social and economic development, in > accordance with the rules and principles > of constitutional law for > the integral protection of children and > adolescents, culture, education, social security, > free competition and the Organic Law of > Telecommunications. > > > > > > > > The > bill is very ambiguous > and vague because it extends the application of > the prior law (aimed to regulate Radio and TV) to > the Internet sphere. It is not clear what > applies to Internet Service providers and > electronic media and what not. > > > > > > > > > > The bill defines 4 elements to be classified: > language, sex, health and violence. And > categorized each element into different > levels of publishing or broadcasting: A, > B, C, D and sometimes E. > > > > > > > > > > Section 8 defines the prohibitions for > Radio, TV and Electronic Media in > connection with content that: > > > > > contain elements of sex type "E" health "D" and > violence "C". may > incite hatred or promote religious, > political, gender intolerance or racism or > xenophobia. incite or > promote and / or justify crime. could be war > propaganda may be handled > and designed by media to promote unrest in > the citizenship or disturb public order. > may be destined to ignore the legally > constituted authorities, disrespect to the > authorities or persons carrying these charges. > could lead to president > assassination. could incite or > promote breach of law. offend > good customs. use visual > techniques, sound or contexts that prevent > or hinder the users to perceive them > consciously. Internet > Service Providers should establish mechanism to > restrict, without delay, the dissemination of and > access to content subsumed under the > prohibitions contained in paragraphs > 2,3,4,5,6,7,8, 9 and 10, when requested > by National Telecommunications Commission > > in exercise of its powers. The > National Telecommunications Commission > may order Internet Service Providers to restrict > access to messages and reported portals. > > > > > > > > Internet service providers > will be responsible for the information and > content prohibited referred in this Article, in > cases that they originated the > transmittion, modified the data, selected > the recipients fail to limited the access to them in > response to the request made by > > bodies with jurisdiction in the matter. > > > > > > > > > Section 28 subsections 3 and 4: extend > sanctions to ISPs. Penalties could range from > 3-4% of their annual gross income. Those > penalties has a particular focus on advertisement > associated with different activities > (professional services without the proper > national > certification, beneficial institutions without > the proper registration, tabacco, alcohol,sexual > services and products, ads against transport law > (I imagine speeding, radars detectors) among > others. > > > > > > > > > > Section 29 established additional penalties, > suspension and revocation of government > concesions to provide their services. > > > > > The penalties could go up to 10% and suspensions > of services up to 72 hours, when providers > disseminate the following type of messages: > > > > > > > > > > a) Those that promote, advocate or incite war > > b) Those that promote, advocate or incite > public disturbances; > > c) Those that promote, advocate or incite > crime; > > d) Those that may > incite hatred or promote religious, > political, gender intolerance or racism or > xenophobia. > > e) Those that may be discriminatory > > f) Those that may be contrary to National > security; > > g) Anonymous messages. > > h) Those that could be war propaganda > > i) Those that could be > handled and designed by media to promote > unrest in the citizenship or disturb public > order. > > j) Those that are intended to ignore > the legally constituted authorities, > disrespecting the public authorities or > persons carrying these authorities. > > k) Those which could lead to president > assassination > > > > > > > > > > Revocation will take > place when providers subject to this > law repeated the conducts sanctioned above. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. About the Bill amending the National > Organic Telecommunications Law: > > > > > > > > > > New Section 212: Creation of National Exchange > Point or Network Access Point for > Internet Service Providers in Venezuela > > > > > The State create an Exchange Point or Network > Access Point for Internet Service > Providers in Venezuela in order to manage > the traffic from and to Venezuela > with the purpose to having a more > efficient use of the networks in the > country, given the strategic nature of the > sector. The governing body (National > Telecommunications Commission) will determine > the State enterprise that will be responsible > for installation, operation and maintenance of > the Exchange Point or Network Access Point for > Internet Service Providers and will issue, by > resolution, the rules applicable to determine > the model, constraints, requirements, > implementation schedule and any other > matter necessary to achieve the conditions > that may be appropriate for proper > implementation. > > > > > > > > > > If the government force all the national ISPs to > connect to the IXP/NAP the will have the > technical ability to inspect, filter and block > internet traffic from and to Venezuela. > > > > > > > > > > Conclusions: > > > > > > > > > This constitutes a > flaflagrant violations to the OAS > Inter-american Convention of Human Rights, > particularly sections related to freedom of speech > and indirect censorship. > > > > > > > > If both bills got > passed, Internet services, particularly web 2.0 > platforms, will face increasing blocking > and filtering in Venezuela, at ISP level. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Useful links: > > > > > > > > > > Press: > > > > > http://ca.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idCATRE6B90SA20101210 (Reuters, > English) > > > > > http://fromtheold.com/news/internet/chavez-plans-censor-internet-20933 > (English) > > > > > http://www.codigovenezuela.com/2010/12/noticias/politico/la-censura-para-in… > > > > > http://caracas.eluniversal.com/2010/12/10/pol_ava_gobierno-creara-punt_10A4… > > > > > > > > > > Blogs: > > > > > Internet censorship in Venezuela: the real > objectives (in English): > http://daniel-venezuela.blogspot.com/2010/12/internet-censorship-in-venezue… > > > > > > > > > > Venezuela's National Assembly Website: > > > > > Proyecto de Ley de Reforma de > la Ley Orgánica de > Telecomunicaciones > Proyecto de Ley De Reforma de > La Ley de Responsabilidad Social en > Radio y Televisión > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > Pedro > > > > > > -- > > Pedro Less Andrade ■ Gerente Senior de Asuntos > Gubernamentales y Políticas Públicas / Senior Policy Counsel ■ > Google ■ Latin America > > O: +54 11 5530 3209 ■ M: +54 911 6242 4153 ■ > pedroless(a)google.com > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -- > > Pedro Less Andrade ■ Gerente Senior de Asuntos > Gubernamentales y Políticas Públicas / Senior Policy Counsel ■ > Google ■ Latin America > > O: +54 11 5530 3209 ■ M: +54 911 6242 4153 ■ > pedroless(a)google.com > > > > > >______________________________________________________________________ > > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security > System. > > For more information please visit > http://www.messagelabs.com/email > >______________________________________________________________________ > > > > _______________________________________________IRP mailing > listIRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.orghttp:// > lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/listinfo.cgi/irp-internetrightsandpri… > > > > > > comunica-ch > phone +41 79 204 83 87 > Skype: Wolf-Ludwig > www.comunica-ch.net > > Digitale Allmend > http://blog.allmend.ch - > > EURALO - ICANN's Regional At-Large Organisation > http://euralo.org > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac > >

1 0

Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?La_O=�N=�U_reflexiona_sobre_opc = =?iso-8859-1?q?iones_de_la_regulaci=F3n_del_Internet =
by cintra.sooknanan＠gmail.com Dec. 17, 2010

Dec. 17, 2010

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?La_O=ÈN=ÈU_reflexiona_sobre_opc = =?iso-8859-1?q?iones_de_la_regulaci=F3n_del_Internet = From: cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com sorry for this, translation software keeps translating the HTTPaddress. http://www.itnews.com.au/News/242051, a-mulls-Internet-regulation-options.aspx Third try is usually the charm:) C 2010/12/17 <cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com> > > [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]] > > > Subject: Re: The O.N.U reflects on options of the regulationof the Internet > Of: cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com > > Hardly in case that the connection was gorge, here estáotratime > > http://www.itnews.com.au/News/242051, > a-mulls-Internet-regulation-options.aspx > > < > http://www.itnews.com.au/News/242051, a-mulls-Internet-regulation-options.aspx > > > C > > fri, DEC 17, 2010 in 9:59, Sooknanan Arch < > cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com > wrote: > > Wanted All, > > sees the article underneath watching please > governmental regulation of the Internet of the O.N.U > > > >> > http://www.itnews.com.au/News/242051, > a-mulls-Internet-regulation-options.aspx > > > > abstract: "my > preoccupation is that one if we made a movement to the form to > body then > governmental-only that would very hard send a signal tocivilian > > society that its valuable contribution was not required nor was > looked for, " > representing innomado Australian said to the meeting > > respect > > Arch > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0efca67Ã£'.html > --]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org > _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/354d46766e.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] [ttcs] UN mulls internet regulation options
by Cintra Sooknanan Dec. 17, 2010

Dec. 17, 2010

Dear All, Please see the article below regarding UN governmental Internet regulation- > > http://www.itnews.com.au/News/242051,un-mulls-internet-regulation-options.a… > > Excerpt: "My concern is that if we were to make a move to form a governmental-only body then that would send a very strong signal to civil society that their valuable contribution was not required or was not being looked for," an un-named Australian representative told the meeting. Regards Cintra

1 1

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Statement from TTCS on a CSTD decision on 6 DEC 2010
by andrespiazza＠gmail.com Dec. 14, 2010

Dec. 14, 2010

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Statement from TTCS on a CSTD decision on 6 DEC 2010 From: andrespiazza(a)gmail.com Dev Thanks, We can count on a Consensus of LACRALO supporting that declaration. Greetings, Andrés 2010/12/13 Dev Anand Teelucksingh <admin(a)ttcsweb.org> > Dear All, > > Please see our statement below. Crucial It is to support thisstatement and > we hope you will also sign this petition or get dwells information regarding > this issue and ISOC press release AT > http://isoc.org/wp/newsletter/?p=2710 and sign the petition > > > "The Trinidad and Tobago Computer Society (TTCS; http://ttcsweb.org/) is > appalled by the United Nations Commission on Science and forTechnology > Development (CSTD) decision on 6 December 2010 which would establish a > Working Group on Improvements to the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) > comprising only governmental members. > > TTCS appeals the a CSTD to to reconsider this decision and instead ensure > that > this Working Group is appropriately constituted with full and activates > participation of all stakeholders including governments, private sector and > civil society from both developing and developed countries; and involving > relevant intergovernmental and international organisations and foru! ms." > > Regards > Arch > Trinidad and Tobago Computer Society > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-in mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-in > -- * AndrÃ©s Piazza * www.andrespiazza.com _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/df737afd44.html --]]

2 1