March 2011 - lac-discuss-en

WHOIS Review - Announcement
by Carlton Samuels March 7, 2011

March 7, 2011

Dear Colleagues: We (collectively in the WHOIS WG) have some work to do. See http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-04mar11-en.htm <http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-04mar11-en.htm>Carlton Samuels Chair, At-Large WHOIS WG ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround =============================

1 0

LACRALO conference call Monday 14 March 2011 from 21:00-22:30 UTC ; any modifications to the agenda?
by Dev Anand Teelucksingh March 7, 2011

March 7, 2011

Dear All, The next LACRALO conference call is scheduled for Monday 14 March 2011 from 21:00 to 22:30 UTC during the 40th ICANN meeting from March 13-18 2011. For the time of the LACRALO conference call in various timezones, see http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=3&day=14&year=20… The agenda for the LACRALO conference call can be viewed at: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Meetings+-+Monday,+14.… If you wish to suggest any additions to this agenda, please email the list or the secretariat at admin(a)ttcsweb.org by Saturday March 12 2011. If you are unable to attend the call please send an email indicating your absence and we will note this information on the agenda. You can LISTEN to the conversation in Spanish and English on the audio streams available under : http://svsf40.icann.org/node/22095 The Adobe Connect room for this LACRALO meeting is http://icann.adobeconnect.com/sfo40-olympic There will only be one telephone channel (conference id 1638) for this meeting. However, you can TALK in either English or Spanish and it will be translated by our local interpreters. If you need a dial-out, please send a dial-out request to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org. Kind Regards, Dev Anand Teelucksingh LACRALO Secretariat

1 0

Beginner's Guides now available
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 5, 2011

March 5, 2011

Dear All, The ICANN Communications Department is pleased to announce that the "Beginner's Guide to IP Addresses", the second in a series of Beginner's Guides prepared at the request of the ALAC, has now been posted to ICANN's website. Although it is currently only in English, the French and Spanish versions will be available shortly. In addition, the first Beginner's Guide entitled "Beginner's Guide to Domain Names" is newly available in French and Spanish. The Beginner's Guides are available at: http://www.icann.org/en/learning/. The summary of the "Beginner's Guide to IP Addresses" is: Internet Protocol (IP) addresses are the unique identifying numbers that all computers and devices connected to the Internet depend on to communicate with each other. When the pool of available unallocated addresses for IPv4, the original IP addressing system, completely depleted this year, the Internet began a transition to IPv6, a newer Internet Protocol system. This highly readable guide, created in cooperation with ICANN's At-Large community, helps the individual user understand IP addresses and the transition from IPv4 to IPv6. The summary of the Beginner's Guide to Domain Names is: A domain name can become where other people find you on line, and adds to your online identity. Although domain names are a big part of the Internet, understanding how these names work (and the ins and outs of obtaining them) can be mystifying at first. This highly readable guide, created in cooperation with ICANN's At-Large community, helps the individual user understand and use domain names. The Communications Department seeks the At-Large community's feedback on the quality of the French and Spanish translations of the Beginner's Guide to Domain Names. Please send your concrete suggestions to Scott Pinzon, Director, Marketing & Outreach at: scott.pinzon(a)icann.org. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Seth Greene, Gisella Gruber-White, Marilyn Vernon, ICANN At-Large Staff

1 0

IPv6 Community call - MP3 recordings now available
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 5, 2011

March 5, 2011

Dear All, The MP3 recordings of today's At-Large community call on IPv6 are now available in English and Spanish on the agenda page (see: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Community+Call+on+IPv6+04.03.11) . Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Seth Greene, Gisella Gruber-White, Marilyn Vernon, ICANN At-Large Staff

1 0

Fwd:SEEKING INPUTS- US Department of Commerce IANA Notice of Inquiry
by Carlton Samuels March 4, 2011

March 4, 2011

FYI ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround ============================= ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bill Graham <graham(a)isoc.org> Date: Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 1:57 PM Subject: [ISOC] [SEEKING INPUTS} US Department of Commerce IANA Notice of Inquiry To: Chapter Delegates <chapter-delegates(a)elists.isoc.org>, isoc-members-announce(a)elists.isoc.org Dear Chapter Delegates and Members, As you are probably aware, the Government of the United States released its long-awaited Notice of Inquiry on the IANA functions on Friday last week. I'm attaching a pdf version that is easier to read than the Federal Register version on their web site <See: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/>. The deadline for comments is 31 March 2011, so we need to begin developing our response now. The evolution of the IANA function is an issue of immediate and great interest to all parts of ISOC and our companion organizations. I am seeking views from our membership on this important topic to use as inputs when developing the ISOC response to the NOI. I will also be drawing on the Board discussions of the IANA function that have taken place over the past few years. And finally, I will be coordinating with the other I* organizations. I do not believe we should try to develop a joint response to DoC, but we will want to ensure there are no surprises and, ideally, that there is broad general agreement in what we provide to the decision making process. It is my believe that the US government is sincerely hoping to get a broad range of responses from the US and elsewhere with concrete suggestions for improvement of the way the IANA function is handled. For example, they are hoping to hear clear statements about what this community wants; e.g., whether and why there should be changes to how the .arpa and/or the .int are treated in the contract, what should be the arrangements for the protocol parameters, etc. If the Internet technical community would like to see the US government make changes, we need to participate in this process to build a record of those recommendations. Thus I encourage you to send me your inputs by end of day Friday, 18 March, 2011. The NOI is quite detailed, as you will see. It describes the IANA function, and then goes on to ask questions in six areas. To paraphrase, those are: 1/ Whether the interdependent technical functions performed under the IANA should continue to be treated as interdependent, or if there should be changes to the present grouping? 2/ Recognizing that other Internet technical organizations' policies (e.g., IETF, IAB, RIRs, ccTLDs) impact on the performance of the IANA functions, should those be referred to and specified in the IANA functions contract and how? 3/ Should there be changes in the handling of root zone management requests requests pertaining to ccTLDs to address the concerns of some governments and ccTLD operators? 4/ Are the current performance metrics and reporting by the IANA functions operator adequate, or should there be changes? 5/ Are there improvements that should be made to the IANA functions contract to better address the needs of users of the IANA functions? Here the NOI specifically asks if additional information on the performance and administration of the IANA function would make the process more transparent? 6/ Should additional security considerations or enhancements be included in the requirements in the IANA functions contract? In every case, the NOI requests *specific* information and *specific* suggestions for improvements in the IANA contract. This may be an area where ISOC can contribute to the process in a very positive way. I would especially like to hear from you if you are in some direct way a participant or user of the IANA functions, and if you have any specific experience that indicates a need for improvement or alteration of the contract, and if so, what your specific recommendations would be. That kind of input would improve the depth and credibility of the ISOC response. Of course, as always, you are welcome to make your own direct comments to the process, but I would still very much appreciate hearing about your experiences and views. While I have not prepared text for the submission, in general, I would like to see ISOC explain how important it is to rely on the native Internet institutions to play appropriate roles where their expertise contributes to the smooth functioning of the Internet overall. Thus it is important that the roles of the IETF, IAB, RIRs, and ccTLD operators be recognized in the system, and that there is a need to build international confidence in how the IANA function is operated and administered. That includes the need to be more open, transparent and thus accountable in the administration of the process, to match the openness and transparency provided by the operator's extensive reporting. I also foresee suggesting that the stability of the IANA functions could be improved under different process than the current redrawing and renewing of relatively short term IANA functions contracts. I hope that you will read the full NOI, and I look forward to hearing your views on the questions it asks, your experiences, and your recommendations for improvement. Once again, to make it possible for me to prepare the ISOC input, please send me your inputs before end of day on March 18, 2011 or earlier if possible. Thank you in advance Bill _______________________________________________ To manage your ISOC subscriptions or unsubscribe, please log into the ISOC Member Portal: https://portal.isoc.org/ Then choose Interests & Subscriptions from the My Account menu.

1 0

a quick comment about Brussels GAC + Board meeting
by carlos dionisio aguirre March 3, 2011

March 3, 2011

Dear All: I`m seriously concerned, because I did not see any of our ALAC representatives in the adobe chat room this morning. I did not stay at consumer protection session, because I had another compromises. The present people in the Brussels GAC + Board meeting (adobe chat room), could summarize me what was on this session? I think is very important to know about this. Maybe Cynthia or Fatima, please? Was a really pity, didn`t see anyone our ALAC representatives there, maximum when they have responsabilities to inform us. I guess this meeting will be the point of central debate in San Francisco, for that we need an excerpt before the meeting. Perhaps we could elaborate some statement about that. whta do you think about that? Best Regards Carlos Dionisio Aguirre NCA GNSO Council - ICANN former ALAC member by LACRALO Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org

2 4

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fw: RESULT OF THE YOU VOTE: Reviewed supply of the to letterof ALAC JAS
by carlosaguirre62＠hotmail.com March 3, 2011

March 3, 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Fw: RESULT OF THE YOU VOTE: Reviewed supply of the to letterof ALAC JAS From: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com Dear All: In relation with the question reason for the ALAC vote, clearly my serious answer by the YES. In relation with the other subject (CC), I create we will have time inSF to speak on it. This week is really complicated for my. Greetings. Carlos Dionisio Aguirre NCA GNSO Council - ICANN to former ALAC to member by LACRALO Lawyer - Specialistic in Right of the Businesses Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org Date: Thu, 3 Sea 2011 18:43:40 +0000 From: apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-in ] Fw: RESULT OF THE YOU VOTE: Reviewed supply of the to letterof ALAC JAS [ [ - - Translated text (is - > in)--]] Subject: Re: Fw: RESULT OF THE YOU VOTE: Reviewed supply of the to letterof ALAC JAS From: apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx Sergio, thousand thanks for this notices that helps to focus the attention. It seems important to me that Carlos explains the added value to U.S. that saw in the community of consumers; Is a.m. open to being convinced, and believe that the information will be valuable for all. I agree with you in which it agrees to read the documents that you indicate. Alexander Pisanty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr Alexander Pisanty UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com * LinkedIn you promarry out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Â106C0C8614 * They see ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org * It participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On Thu, 3 Is 2011, presidency Argentina Internaut wrote: > Date: Thu, 03 Is 2011 15:34:43 -0300 > From: presidency Argentina Internaut <presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar> > To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] [ lac-discuss-in ] Fw: RESULT OF THE YOU VOTE: > Reviewed supply of the to to letter of ALAC JAS > > Thanks mail Carlosto send the in the list in Spanish, many of > this list you is going it to be thankful (they between whom I a.m.). > > is very interesting the interchange to Me from opinions withrespect to > the Consumer Constituency and the Not For Profit Constituency, podrian to be > under amiable ace much vos Carlos ace Alex, to power to deepen in this, > mainly in the knowledge that you have of the people who > impels... I believe that this dog be very good to clarify usthose > that we have not had possibility of interacting with them onpoints of > Vista and excellent information AT ! the Time of making decisions. > >Quiero to clarify that the voting shipment is based on this question with > three possi! ble answers: > > Apoya you it ratification of the Observation of ALAC on "comment on > the for Draft Process Recognition of New GNSO Constituencies"stops > to communicate it in the corresponding Public Commentary that this in process? > * possible With the answers: * > * Yes > Not > To abstain * > > Propongo that we also read the following Link and that if wehave things > to say from LACRALO we add it in a commentary: > > https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Comment+on+the+Draft+Proc… > warm Greetings > > * Sergio Saline I carry President Inter nauta Argentina Association > Argentina de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI- > Latin American Federation of Users of Internet > <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook:salinasporto > twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... > Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:! +54 9 223 5 215819 * > > * > > "Hopefully we pruned to be disobedi! ent, to whenever we receivedorders that > humiliates our conscien! EC or I saw olates our common sense "- Eduardo > Galeano- > > * > > > the 03/03/2011 11:52 a.m., Carlos dionisio Aguirre wrote: > > Considered All. the to answer to my opinion on the creation of new constituenciesin the GNSO, is that we cannot deny the importance of the participation and the diversity in the discussion. But that this does not have to be considered in abstract AT the Time of deciding andvoting. For that reason I proputs that Our representatives in ALAC before making to their voting see documents in links sent in my previous mail that would you would daran to better idea to them of like voting and doing it responsibly. > > Today the new presented/displayed constituencies is the Consumer Constituency and the Not For Profit Constituency and some but they estan wanting to make its appearance. Individual My vision in the caseof these two mentioned is: support the creation of the Consumer Constituency since being in ALAC I have spoken with its imp! ellers and convinced to me (although thi! s is single my opinion which it is on to theother hand not shared by ALEX, mail segun I see in its), and I a.m. not very safe to support the for Not Profit x q I have doubts about the distinction (this particular dog be to lack of knowledge) between the CC, NFPC, NCUC, NCSG and until ace much that doubt it vanishes..... > > > > my two cents > > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > > NCA GNSO Council - ICANN > > to to former ALAC to to member by LACRALO > > Lawyer - Specialistic in Right of the Businesses > > Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina- > > * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 > > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > > > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 3 Is 2011 14:30:35 +0000 > > From: to to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > CC: > > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-in ] Fw: RESULT OF THE YOU VOTE: Reviewed supply of the toto letter of ALAC JAS > ! > > > > > [ [ - - Translated text (is - > in)--]] > > > >! > > Subject: Re: Fw: RESULT OF THE YOU VOTE: Reviewed supply or! f the to to letter of ALAC JAS > > From: to to to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > > > for Thanks Carlos your participation, you would be to under amiable to send > > replaced his in the Spanish channel? > > Lamentably the translation to ingles does very difficult to understandthat > > this saying and ace is its position, knows that its opinion is very valuable > > on the subject, but we did not manage to to to decipher it from to badone > > translation, tells that in its maternal language we will be able to understand it to to better > > those companions of the LACRALO that wespoke fluidly Spanish but that > > the English. > > There a.m. dog clarify if you to U.S. this in agreement with the opinion that maintains > > ALAC with respect to the New GNSO Constituencies? > > Warm greetings > > > > * Sergio Saline I carry President Internaut Argentina Association > > Argentina de Usuarios de ! Internet<http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI- > > Latin America! n federation of Users of Internet > > <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook:salinasporto > > twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... > > Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * > > > > * > > > > "Hopefully we pruned to be disobedient, to to whenever we received orders that > > they humiliate our conscience or sense they violate our common" - Eduardo > > Galeano- > > > > * > > > > > > The 03/03/2011 10:06 a.m., carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com wrote: > [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]]> > > Subject: Re: Fw:RESULT OF THE YOUVOTE: Reviewed supply of the to to letter of ALAC JAS > Of: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com > > > Wanted All: > > electoral With respect to the new districts in GNSO, this one is part of the improvements http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/of GNSO and you invites our representatives in ALAC that ! read. > to understand the process that I also in! vites to read doccuments - the new process of contituency - in! http:// gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/newco-process-en.htm, to read to tolater and to understand those doccuments, safe able I`m you will be todecide to fill your responsabilities. > My certain point of view is that one: I`m in electoral favor to the new districts, but not totallysurely in all the you marry for example I you use to electoral district of the consumers. > electoral I`m not totally surely in marries that of it does not stop the district of the horseradish tree!> > efit, in this marries I have doubts with respect to the differencebetween the cubical to to centimeter, NFPC, NCSG, NCUC (I know that it could be an appropriate deficiency of the knowledge of me). And finally I`m almost surely against the to to other wichof the electoral districts there plows presented/displayed its requests. > > My two cents. > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > Advice of NCA GNSO - ICANN >previous to to member of ALAC of LACRALO > In Right of the Businesses of Lawyer -! of Specialist &gt! ; Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordova - Argentina - > * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > > > > Date: Thu, The 3 Of March 2011 11:45:07 Of +0000 > Of: to to to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar >: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > cubical Centimeter: > Subject: Re: [ lacquer-discuss-lac-discuss-in ] Fw: RESULT OF THE YOU VOTE: Reviewed supply of the to to letter of ALAC JAS > > > [ [ - - translated text (is ->)--]] of in > > > Subject: Re: Fw: RESULT OF THEVOTES: Reviewed supply of the to to letter of ALAC JAS! > > > Of: to to to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > Ace Ã ©l indicates!> > tes mail it C > > ar them well in its was one of which they represented > of the LACRALO that podrÃÂa not to you vote on the supply of ALAC JAS. > > That representing was. > > razÃÂ³n by which Ihave notbeen able to you vote is the breakageof myHD in my PC >! invalido cuÃ l toemit my you vote, I req! uest to you excuses all to him by > this, but without the to! compute impossible r was without to doubt to me to do it. > > I must indicate inside that Ã ©l was going to make affirmative, like expressedit > my mail when enviÃ© the alert of the consultationin the list in this subject > did the 01/03, lamentably Ã ©l was not contribuciÃÂ³n nuestrasexes > representing, that of insurancevery habÃÂa been enriching for all. > > Because to animate the box that I must indicate that, contribuciÃÂ³nvaliosa©Ã l was sÃÂ the of > to to other members of regiÃÂ³n that preocupÃÂ³ to toto answer itself themail and > to contributeto its ends of visiÃÂ³n and the knowledge for the decision making, > those end! > > s of visiÃÂ³n habÃÂan been suitable with ours intenciÃÂ³n of the you vote > > mail DeseÃÂ³ to take advantage of this to request Carlos to him who offers electoral U.S. to his > point of view in the processes of the reco! gnition of the newGNSO > surpasses to the district, from oft! Ã ©rminoof dÃÂa 04/03/2011 voting. > > TambiÃ©n wantedto lists what the to to other members think ours > regiÃÂ³n, ace ace theream is of to to order in this management serÃ taken inside > counts AT theTime of defining our you vote in ofvoting of theprocesses of > the subjects that plows discussed in ALAC, for Ã ©l envÃÂo one conexiÃÂ³n that dog > to be one guÃÂa in the subject: > > https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Comment+on+the+Draft+Proc… > hot Greetings > > * saline Sergio I take asociaciÃÂ³n of president Argentina Internaut > Internet of Argentina de Usuarios of<http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI - > Latin American FederaciÃÂ³n! > > of users of the Internet > <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - > > to to member f > > acebook:salinasporto of ALAC > twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHO! O/Talk: salinasporto... > Skype:internautaargentina Mo! bi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * > > > the 02/03/2011 12:39 P.! M., Carl osaguirre62(a)hotmail.com escribiÃÂ³: > [ [ - - text translated(in - > is)--]]>>> subject: Fw: RESULT OF THE YOU VOTE: Reviewed OfALAC of the supply of the JAS>de to to letter: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com > > > DeseÃÂ³ All: I`ve finishes seeing of the email down, and my surprise was very great, because: 1 of 2 that our ALAC eligiÃÂ³ regionalrepresentatives, the NINGÃs(N to you decide participates in the survey Ã ' DeseÃÂ³ to know by quÃ©?Ã ' quÃ© in you? Ã ' cuÃ l was motivaciÃÂ³na to you decide? despuÃ©s of which Ã ©l asksabout that ours maximun of opiniÃÂ³nwhen there plows three members of LACRALO in the WG (to Co-chair), and Ã ©l watch like I who everything deserves our aid (of one even being I Ã ©l). > > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > advice of NC! > > To GNSO - ICANN > previous to to member of ALAC of LACRALO > in the right of the businesses of! the to to lawyer - of the specialist > of Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18! Cordova - Argentina - > * 54-351-424-2123 > /423-5423 > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > you date: Wed, the 2 of march 2011 of 09:55:11 of +0100 > of: Ã ' staff@atlarg > e.icann.org > a: alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > subject: RESULT [ of ALAC-Anuncie ] of the YOU VOTE: The reviewed to to letter ProposalofALAC JAS > > deseÃÂ³ all, > > with 11 members of outside 15of ALACen which you votes in the recent you votes > proposed the reviewed to to letter of ALACJAS, we dog confirm that quorate is the results >. > > *********>> youuse ratificaciÃÂ³n of the supply repasadade the to to letter of ALAC JAS > > sÃÂ: 11 (100.00%) > Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Carlton Samuels, Jean-Jacques Subrenat, Sandra > Hoferichter, Evan Leibovitch, James Seng, Sylvia Leite, Olivier > CrÃ©pin-Leblond, the! > > Bashir, Dewandranath Kissoondoyal, GarethDe Mohammed > She! > > arman&g > > t! ; > not: 0 (0.00%) > > abstains: 0 (0.00%) > > ***********>> you dog verify the head of cattle! ults ind ependently underneath: Ã ' > https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=1592gybVUyKuQsbcf9DLza2g>>p… > did not participate the following members of ALAC > in > votaciÃfÃ'Â³n: Ã ' > > Edmon Chungking > Orujo Of memory > &g of nberg > t; Ã?rbol bano Jemaa of rÃ sharp of saline Tijani > I take accepts Sergio > > you who you dog underneath find the results detodosthe closed you votes of ALAC: Ã ' > https://www.bigpulse.com/m7097 > > respect to -->,>> Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Seth Greene, Gisella Gruber-Blanco, > Marilyn Vernon, Kristina NordstrÃfÃ'Â¶m > personal En-Grande-Grande of ICANN > > > email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org > site of the Web: www.atlarge.icann.org > _______________________________________________> ALAC-Anuncie listthatenvÃfÃ'Âa > ALAC-Announc! > > e(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/ma! ilman/listinfo/alac-announce & gt; > official En-Grande-Grande of the site: Ã ' http://atlarge.icann.org > > _______________________________________________>>>>> [ [ - - the original text (inside) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/11ÃÂªb0a6f5.html > --]]>>>>>!> _______________________________________________> lacquer-to discuss estÃ sending the list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann > org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org > _______________________________________________> > > > > [ [ - - original text (it is) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/19a716b172.html > --]]> > > > _______________________________________________> > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/db65d40da3.html > --]]> > > > > _______________________________________________> l! > > a! c-discuss-i! s mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.ican! > >! n.org &g t; > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (it is) > > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/462d4cc54b.html > > --]] > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-in mailing list > > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-in > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-is mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-li! sts.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org > _______________________________________________ [ [ - - Original text (it is) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3f362fa1f9.html --]] _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/59c8f3fee2.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letterof ALAC JAS
by apisan＠servidor.unam.mx March 3, 2011

March 3, 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letterof ALAC JAS From: apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx Sergio, thousand thanks for this note that helps to focus the attention. It seems important to me that Carlos explains the added value to us that saw in the community of consumers; I am open to being convinced, and believe that the information will be valuable for all. I agree with you in which it agrees to read the documents that you indicate. Alexander Pisanty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr Alexander Pisanty UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com * LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Â106C0C8614 * They see ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org * It participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On Thu, 3 Sea 2011, presidency Argentina Internaut wrote: > Date: Thu, 03 Sea 2011 15:34:43 -0300 > From: presidency Argentina Internaut <presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar> > To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] [ lac-discuss-in ] Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: > Reviewed supply of the to letter of ALAC JAS > > Thanks Carlos to send the mail in the list in Spanish, many of > this list you is going it to be thankful (between whom I am). > > is very interesting the interchange to Me from opinions withrespect to > the Consumer Constituency and the Not For Profit Constituency, podrian to be > so amiable as much vos Carlos as Alex, power to deepen in this, > mainly in the knowledge that you have of the people who > impels... I believe that this can be very good to clarify usthose > that we have not had possibility of interacting with them onpoints of > Vista and excellent information at the time of making decisions. > > Quiero to clarify that the voting shipment is based on this question with > three possi! ble answers: > > Apoya you it ratification of the Observation of ALAC on "comment on > the Draft for Process Recognition of New GNSO Constituencies"stops > to communicate it in the corresponding Public Commentary that this in process? > * With the possible answers: * > * Yes > No > To abstain * > > Propongo that we also read the following Link and that if wehave things > to say from LACRALO we add it in a commentary: > > https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Comment+on+the+Draft+Proc… > > warm Greetings > > * Sergio Saline I carry President Inter nauta Argentina Association > Argentina de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI- > Latin American Federation of Users of Internet > <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook:salinasporto > twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... > Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * > > * > > "Hopefully we pruned to be disobedi! ent, whenever we receivedorders that > humiliates our conscien! ce or vi olates our common sense "- Eduardo > Galeano- > > * > > > the 03/03/2011 11:52 a.m., Carlos dionisio Aguirre wrote: > > Considered All. the answer to my opinion on the creation of new constituencies in the GNSO, is that we cannot deny the importance of the participation and the diversity in the discussion. But that this does not have to be considered in abstract at the time of deciding andvoting. For that reason I propose that Our representatives in ALAC before making their voting see documents in links sent in my previous mail that would daran a better idea to them of like voting and doing it responsibly. > > Today the new presented/displayed constituencies is the Consumer Constituency and the Not For Profit Constituency and some but they estan wanting to make its appearance. My individual vision in the caseof these two mentioned is: support the creation of the Consumer Constituency since being in ALAC I have spoken with its impellers and convinced to me (although thi! s is single my opinion which it is on theother hand not shared by ALEX, segun I see in its mail), and I am not very safe to support the for Not Profit x q I have doubts about the distinction (this can be a lack of particular knowledge) between the CC, NFPC, NCUC, NCSG and until as much that doubt it vanishes..... > > > > my two cents > > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > > NCA GNSO Council - ICANN > > to former ALAC to member by LACRALO > > Lawyer - Specialistic in Right of the Businesses > > Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - > > * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 > > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > > > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 3 Sea 2011 14:30:35 +0000 > > From: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > CC: > > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-in ] Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letter of ALAC JAS > > > > > > [ [ - - Translated text (is - > in)--]] > > > > ! > > Subject: Re: Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply o! f the to letter of ALAC JAS > > From: to to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > > > Thanks for Carlos your participation, you would be under amiable to send > > replaced his in the Spanish channel? > > Lamentably the translation to ingles does very difficult to understandthat > > this saying and ace is its position, knows that its opinion is very valuable > > on the subject, but we did not manage to to decipher it from to badone > > translation, tells that in its maternal language we will be able to understand it to better > > those companions of the LACRALO that we spoke fluidly Spanish but that > > the English. > > There am dog clarify if you to U.S. this in agreement with the opinion that maintains > > ALAC with respect to the New GNSO Constituencies? > > Warm greetings > > > > * Sergio Saline I carry President Internaut Argentina Association > > Argentina de Usuarios de Internet<http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI- > > Latin America! n federation of Users of Internet > > <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook:salinasporto > > twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... > > Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * > > > > * > > > > "Hopefully we pruned to be disobedient, to whenever we received orders that > > they humiliate our conscience or sense they violate our common "- Eduardo > > Galeano- > > > > * > > > > > > The 03/03/2011 10:06 a.m., carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com wrote: > [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]]> > > Subject: Re: Fw:RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letter of ALAC JAS > Of: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com > > > Wanted All: > > electoral With respect to the new districts in GNSO, this one is part of the improvements http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/of GNSO and you invite our representatives in ALAC that read. > to understand the process that I also in! vites to read doccuments - the new process of contituency - in! http:// gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/newco-process-en.htm, to read tolater and to understand those doccuments, safe able I`m you will be todecide to fill your responsabilities. > My certain point of view is that one: I`m in electoral favor to the new districts, but not totallysurely in all the you marry for example I uses to electoral district of the consumers. > I`m not totally surely in marries that of it does not stop the electoral district of the horseradish tree! > > efit, in this marries I have doubts with respect to the differencebetween the cubical to centimeter, NFPC, NCSG, NCUC (I know that it could be an appropriate deficiency of the knowledge of me). And finally I`m almost surely against the to other wichof the electoral districts there are presented/displayed its requests. > > My two cents. > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > Advice of NCA GNSO - ICANN > previous to member of ALAC of LACRALO > In Right of the Businesses of Lawyer - of Specialist &gt! ; Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordova - Argentina - > * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > > > > Date: Thu, The 3 Of March 2011 11:45:07 Of +0000 > Of: to to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar >: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > cubical Centimeter: > Subject: Re: [ lacquer-discuss-lac-discuss-in ] Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letter of ALAC JAS > > > [ [ - - translated text (is ->)--]] of in > > > Subject: Re: Fw: RESULT OF THEVOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letter of ALAC JAS! > > > Of: to to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > Ace Ã©l indicates! > > tes it C > > ar them well in its mail was one of which they represented > of the LACRALO that podrÃÂa not to votes on the supply of ALAC JAS. > > That representing was. > > razÃÂ³n by which I have notbeen able to votes is the breakageof myHD in my PC > invalido cuÃ l toemit my votes, I req! uest to you excuse all to him by > this, but without the to! compute r was without to doubt impossible to me to do it. > > I must indicate inside that Ã©l was going to make affirmative, like expressedit > my mail when enviÃ© the alert of the consultation in the list in this subject > did the 01/03, lamentably Ã©l was not contribuciÃÂ³n nuestrasexes > representing, that of insurance very habÃÂa been enriching for all. > > Because to animate the box that I must indicate that, contribuciÃÂ³nvaliosa©Ã l was sÃÂ the of > to other members of regiÃÂ³n that preocupÃÂ³ to to answer itself themail and > to contributeto its ends of visiÃÂ³n and the knowledge for the decision making, > those end! > > s of visiÃÂ³n habÃÂan been suitable with ours intenciÃÂ³n of the votes. > > mail DeseÃÂ³ to take advantage of this to request Carlos to him who offers electoral U.S. to his > point of view in the processes of the recognition of the newGNSO > surpasses to the district, from oft! Ã©rminoof dÃÂa 04/03/2011 voting. > > TambiÃ©n wantedto lists what the to other members think ours > regiÃÂ³n, ace ace theream is of to order in this management serÃ taken inside > counts AT theTime of defining our votes in ofvoting of the processes of > the subjects that plows discussed in ALAC, for Ã©l envÃÂo one conexiÃÂ³n that dog > to be one guÃÂa in the subject: > > https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Comment+on+the+Draft+Proc… > hot Greetings > > * saline Sergio I take asociaciÃÂ³n of president Argentina Internaut > Internet of Argentina de Usuarios of<http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI - > Latin American FederaciÃÂ³n! > > of users of the Internet > <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO -! > > to member f > > acebook:salinasporto of ALAC > twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... > Skype:internautaargentina Mo! bi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * > > > the 02/03/2011 12:39 P.! M., carl osaguirre62(a)hotmail.com escribiÃÂ³: > [ [ - - text translated (in -> is)--]]>>> subject: Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed OfALAC of the supply of the JAS>de to letter: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com > > > DeseÃÂ³ All: I`ve finishes seeing of the email down, and my surprise was very great, because: 1 of 2 that our ALAC eligiÃÂ³ regionalrepresentatives, the NINGÃs(N to decides participates in the survey Ã DeseÃÂ³ to know by quÃ©? Ã quÃ© in you? Ã cuÃ l was motivaciÃÂ³na to decides? despuÃ©s of which Ã©l asksabout that ours maximun of opiniÃÂ³nwhen there plows three members of LACRALO in the WG (to Co-chair), and Ã©l watch like I who everything deserves our aid (of even being I one Ã©l). > > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > advice of NC! > > To GNSO - ICANN > previous to member of ALAC of LACRALO > in the right of the businesses of the to lawyer - of the specialist > of Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 ! Cordova - Argentina - > * 54-351-424-2123 > /423-5423 > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > dates: Wed, the 2 of march 2011 of 09:55:11 of +0100 > of: Ã staff@atlarg > e.icann.org > a: alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > subject: RESULT [ of ALAC-Anuncie ] of the VOTES: The reviewed to letter ProposalofALAC JAS> > deseÃÂ³ all, > > with 11 members of outside 15 of ALACen which you vote in the recent you vote > proposed the reviewed to letter of ALACJAS, we dog confirm that quorate is the results >. > > *********>>youuse ratificaciÃÂ³n of the supply repasadade the to letter of ALAC JAS > > sÃÂ: 11 (100.00%) > Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Carlton Samuels, Jean-Jacques Subrenat, Sandra > Hoferichter, Evan Leibovitch, James Seng, Sylvia Leite, Olivier > CrÃ©pin-Leblond, the! > > Bashir, Dewandranath Kissoondoyal, Gareth De Mohammed > She! > > arman&g > > t; > not: 0 (0.00%) > > abstains: ! 0 (0.00%) > > ***********>> you dog verify the res! ults ind ependently underneath: Ã >https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=1592gybVUyKuQsbcf9DLza2g>>podemostoconfirm that > did not participate the following members of ALAC > in > votaciÃfÃÂ³n: Ã > > Edmon Chungking > Orujo Of memory > &g of nberg >t; Ã?rbol bano Jemaa of rÃ sharp of saline Tijani > I take accepts Sergio > > you who you dog underneath find the results detodosthe closed you vote of ALAC: Ã > https://www.bigpulse.com/m7097 > > respect to -->,>> Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Seth Greene, Gisella Gruber-Blanco, > Marilyn Vernon, Kristina NordstrÃfÃÂ¶m > personal En-Grande-Grande of ICANN > > > email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org > site of the Web: www.atlarge.icann.org > _______________________________________________> ALAC-Anuncie listthatenvÃfÃÂa > ALAC-Announc! > > e(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce &! gt; > official En-Grande-Grande of the site: Ã http://atlarge.icann.org > > _______________________________________________>>>>> [ [ - - the original text (inside) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/11ÃÂªb0a6f5.html > --]]>>>>>!> _______________________________________________> lacquer-to discuss estÃ sending the list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann > org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org > _______________________________________________> > > > > [ [ - - original text (it is) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/19a716b172.html > --]]> > > > _______________________________________________> > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/db65d40da3.html > --]]> > > > > _______________________________________________> l! > > ac-discuss-i! s mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.ican! > > ! n.org &g t; > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (it is) > > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/462d4cc54b.html > > --]] > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-in mailing list > > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-in > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-is mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org > _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3f362fa1f9.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letterof ALAC JAS
by presidencia＠internauta.org.ar March 3, 2011

March 3, 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letterof ALAC JAS From: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar Thanks Carlos to send the mail in the list in Spanish, many of this list you is going it to be thankful (between whom I am). The interchange is to me very interesting from opinions with respect to the Consumer Constituency and the Not For Profit Constituency, podrian to be so amiable as much vos Carlos as Alex, power to deepen in this, mainly in the knowledge that you have of the people who they impel... I believe that this can be very good to clarify us those that we have not had possibility of interacting with them on points of Vista and excellent information at the time of making decisions. I want to clarify that the voting shipment is based on this question with three possible answers: You support it ratification of the Observation of ALAC on "comment on the Draft for Process Recognition of New GNSO Constituencies "stops to communicate it in the corresponding Public Commentary that this in process? * With the possible answers: * * Yes No To abstain * I propose that we also read the following Link and that if we have things in order to say from LACRALO we add it in a commentary: https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Comment+on+the+Draft+Proc… Warm greetings * Sergio Saline I carry President Inter nauta Argentina Association Argentina de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI- Latin American federation of Users of Internet <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook:salinasporto twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * * "Hopefully we pruned to be disobedient, whenever we received orders that they humiliate our conscience or they violate our common sense"- Eduardo Galeano- * The 03/03/2011 11:52 a.m., Carlos dionisio Aguirre wrote: > Considered All. the answer to my opinion on the creation of new constituencies in the GNSO, is that we cannot deny the importance of the participation and the diversity in the discussion. But that this does not have to be considered in abstract at the time of deciding andvoting. For that reason I propose that Our representatives in ALAC before making their voting see documents in links sent in my previous mail that would daran a better idea to them of like voting and doing it responsibly. > Today the new presented/displayed constituencies are the Consumer Constituency and the Not For Profit Constituency and some but they estan wanting to make its appearance. My individual vision in the caseof these two mentioned is: support the creation of the Consumer Constituency since being in ALAC I have spoken with its impellers and convinced to me (although this is single my opinion which it is on theother hand not shared by A! LEX, segun I see in its mail), and I am not very safe to support the for Not Profit x q I have doubts about the distinction (this can be a lack of particular knowledge) between the CC, NFPC, NCUC, NCSG and until as much that doubt it vanishes..... > > my two cents > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > NCA GNSO Council - ICANN > to former ALAC to member by LACRALO > Lawyer - Specialistic in Right of the Businesses > Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - > * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > > > > Date: Thu, 3 Sea 2011 14:30:35 +0000 > From: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > CC: > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-in ] Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letter of ALAC JAS > > > [ [ - - Translated text (is - > in)--]] > > > Subject: Re: Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply of theto letter of ALAC JAS > From: to to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > Thanks for Carlos your participation, you would be! under amiable to send > replaced his in the Spanish channel? ! > Lament ably the translation to ingles does very difficult to understandthat > this saying and ace is its position, knows that its opinion is very valuable > on the subject, but we did not manage to to decipher it fromto badone > translation, tells that in its maternal language we will be able to understand it to better > those companions of the LACRALO that we spoke fluidly Spanish but that > the English. > There am dog clarify if you to U.S. this in agreement with the opinion that maintains > ALAC with respect to the New GNSO Constituencies? > Warm greetings > > * Sergio Saline I carry President Internaut Argentina Association > Argentina de Usuarios de Internet<http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI- > Latin American federation of Users of Internet > <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook:salinasporto > twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... > Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * > > * > > "Hopefully we pruned to be disobedient, to whe! never we received orders that > they humiliate our conscience or sense they violate our common "- Eduardo > Galeano- > > * > > > The 03/03/2011 10:06 a.m., carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com wrote: > [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]]> > > Subject: Re: Fw:RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letter of ALAC JAS > Of: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com > > > Wanted All: > > electoral With respect to the new districts in GNSO, this one is part of the improvements http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/of GNSO and you invite our representatives in ALAC that read. > to understand the process that I also invites to read doccuments - the new process of contituency - in http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/newco-process-en.htm, to read tolater and to understand those doccuments, safe able I`m you will be todecide to fill your responsabilities. > My certain point of view is that one: I`m in electoral favor to the new districts, but not totally! surely in all the you marry for example I uses to electoral di! strict o f the consumers. > I`m not totally surely in marries that of it does not stop the electoral district of the horseradish tree! > efit, in this marries I have doubts with respect to the difference between the cubical to centimeter, NFPC, NCSG, NCUC (I know that it could be an appropriate deficiency of the knowledge of me). And finally I`m almost surely against the to other wichof the electoral districts there are presented/displayed its requests. > > My two cents. > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > Advice of NCA GNSO - ICANN > previous to member of ALAC of LACRALO > In Right of the Businesses of Lawyer - of Specialist > Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordova - Argentina - > * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > > > > Date: Thu, The 3 Of March 2011 11:45:07 Of +0000 > Of: to to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar >: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > cubical Centimeter: > Subject: Re: [ lacquer-discuss-lac-discuss-in! ] Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letter of ALAC JAS > > > [ [ - - translated text (is ->)--]] of in > > > Subject: Re: Fw: RESULT OF THEVOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letter of ALAC JAS! > > Of: to to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > Ace Ã©l indicates! > tes it C > ar them well in its mail was one of which they represented > of the LACRALO that podrÃa not to votes on the supply of ALAC JAS. > > That representing was. > > razÃ³n by which I have not been able tovotes is the breakageof myHD in my PC > invalido cuÃ l to emit my votes, I request to you excuse all to him by > this, but without the to computer was without to doubt impossible to me to do it. > > I mustindicate inside that Ã©l was going to make affirmative, like expressedit > my mail when enviÃ© the alert of the consultationin the list in this subject > did the 01/03, lamentably Ã©l was not contribuci! Ã³n nuestrasexes > representing, that of insurance very h! abÃa been enriching for all. > > Because to animate the box that I must indicate that, contribuciÃ³nvaliosa©Ã l was sÃ the of > to other members of regiÃ³n that preocupÃ³ to to answer itself themail and > to contribute to its ends of visiÃ³n and the knowledge for the decision making, > those end! > s of visiÃ³n habÃan been suitable with ours intenciÃ³n of the votes. > > mail DeseÃ³ to take advantage of this to request Carlos to him who offers electoral U.S. to his > point of view in the processes of the recognition of the newGNSO > surpasses to the district, from oftÃ©rminoof dÃa 04/03/2011 voting. > > TambiÃ©n wantedto lists what the to other members think ours > regiÃ³n, ace ace theream is of to order in this management serÃ taken inside > counts AT theTime of defining our votes in ofvoting of the processes of > the subjects that plows discussed in ALAC, for Ã©l envÃo one conexiÃ³n ! that dog > to be one guÃa in the subject: > > https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Comment+on+the+Draft+Proc… > hot Greetings > > * saline Sergio I take asociaciÃ³n of president Argentina Internaut > Internet of Argentina de Usuarios of<http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI - > Latin American FederaciÃ³n! > of users of the Internet > <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO -! > to member f > acebook:salinasporto of ALAC > twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... > Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * > > > the 02/03/2011 12:39 P.M., carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com escribiÃ³: > [ [ - - text translated (in -> is)--]]>>> subject: Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed OfALAC of the supply of the JAS>de to letter: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com > > > DeseÃ³ All: I`ve finishes seeing of the email down, and my surprise was very gre! at, because: 1 of 2 that our ALAC eligiÃ³ regionalrepresenta! tives, t he NINGÃs(N to decides participates in the survey Â DeseÃ³ to know by quÃ©? Â quÃ© in you? Â cuÃ l was motivaciÃ³na to decides? despuÃ©s of which Ã©l asksabout that ours maximun of opiniÃ³nwhen there plows three members of LACRALO in the WG (to Co-chair), and Ã©l watch like I who everything deserves our aid (of even being I one Ã©l). > > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > advice of NC! > To GNSO - ICANN > previous to member of ALAC of LACRALO > in the right of the businesses of the to lawyer - of the specialist > of Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordova - Argentina - > * 54-351-424-2123 > /423-5423 > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > dates: Wed, the 2 of march 2011 of 09:55:11 of +0100 > of: Â staff@atlarg > e.icann.org > a: alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > subject: RESULT [ of ALAC-Anuncie ] of the VOTES: The reviewed to letter ProposalofALAC JAS> > deseÃ³ all, > > with 11 members o! f outside 15 of ALACen which you vote in the recent you vote > proposed the reviewed to letter of ALACJAS, we dog confirm that quorate is the results >. > > *********>>youuse ratificaciÃ³n of the supply repasadade the to letter of ALAC JAS > > sÃ: 11 (100.00%) > Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Carlton Samuels, Jean-Jacques Subrenat, Sandra > Hoferichter, Evan Leibovitch, James Seng, Sylvia Leite, Olivier > CrÃ©pin-Leblond, the! > Bashir, Dewandranath Kissoondoyal, Gareth De Mohammed > She! > arman&g > t; > not: 0 (0.00%) > > abstains: 0 (0.00%) > > ***********>> you dog verify the results independently underneath: Â >https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=1592gybVUyKuQsbcf9DLza2g>>podemostoconfirm that > did not participate the following members of ALAC > in > votaciÃfÂ³n: Â > > Edmon Chungking > Orujo Of memory > &g of nberg >t; Ã?rbol bano Jemaa of rÃ sharp of saline Tijani ! > I take accepts Sergio > > you who you dog underneat! h find t he results detodosthe closed you vote of ALAC: Â > https://www.bigpulse.com/m7097 > > respect to -->,>> Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Seth Greene, Gisella Gruber-Blanco, > Marilyn Vernon, Kristina NordstrÃfÂ¶m > personal En-Grande-Grande of ICANN > > > email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org > site of the Web: www.atlarge.icann.org > _______________________________________________> ALAC-Anuncie listthatenvÃfÂa > ALAC-Announc! > e(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce > > official En-Grande-Grande of the site: Â http://atlarge.icann.org > > _______________________________________________>>>>> [ [ - - the original text (inside) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/11Ãªb0a6f5.html > --]]>>>>>!> _______________________________________________> lacquer-to discuss estÃ sending the list > lac-discuss-es@atlarge-li! sts.icann > org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org > _______________________________________________> > > > > [ [ - - original text (it is) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/19a716b172.html > --]]> > > > _______________________________________________> > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/db65d40da3.html > --]]> > > > > _______________________________________________> l! > ac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.ican! > n.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org > _______________________________________________ > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (it is) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/462d4cc54b.html > --]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-in mailing list > lac-di! scuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann! .org/mai lman/listinfo/lac-discuss-in > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/79cda2b993.html --]]

1 0

REMINDER / IPv6 Call - 4 March 1500 UTC
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 3, 2011

March 3, 2011

Dear All, This is to remind you that the At-Large Community is invited to participate in a Community Briefing on IPv6 on Friday, 4 March 2011 at 1500 UTC. (0700 PST, 1000 EST, 1200 Buenos Aires, 1500 London, 1600 CET, 2000 Karachi, 2300 Hong Kong, 0200 Sydney (05.03)) There will be Spanish interpretation for this call. The call will be moderated by Olivier Crépin-Leblond and features a presentation by Leo Vegoda, Operational Excellence Officer IANA at ICANN. The agenda and participation instructions are available at: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Community+Call+on+IPv6+04.03.11 Please note the NEW Adobe Connect: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/ipv6march42011/ Dialout list: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Community+Call+on+IPv6+04.03.11+ Dialouts Please contact staff(a)atlarge.icann.org if you are not currently on the list and require a dialout. Thank you. -- Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Seth Greene, Gisella Gruber-White, Marilyn Vernon, Kristina Nordström ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org website: www.atlarge.icann.org

1 0